[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/cgl/ - Cosplay & EGL

View post   
File: 112 KB, 400x400, color.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7354256 No.7354256[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

Just saw Rococo Daze upload this on their site... I really want this "Chat Tricolore" the back is amazing *O*

>> No.7354273
File: 474 KB, 570x449, 1382392515643.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7354273

Sorry honey, but that print is so tacky.

>> No.7354308

Where's the Regina George gif when you need it?

>cats
>flowers
>red, white & blue ribbons
>cherub
>jesus hell

>> No.7354312

What a statement. I'd definitely wear it but its not something I'm interested in buying. Like rave wear or hippie garb it just doesn't speak to me personally. Looks like something Irregular Choice would make if they did dresses

>> No.7354793

>>7354256
And everyone said how fug the Bodyline Angel dress was compared to the JetJ prints. Hehe. nYan nYan

>> No.7354808

>>7354273

Says the AP clone.

>> No.7355076

>>7354256
Is that bonnets? The cats are wearing bonnets?
no, just no. Some of the JetJ clip art vomit dresses are cute. I like the bustle and the general colors, but angel, cats in bonnets, and French streamers do not make a dress I will be buying.

>> No.7355085

>>7355076
Bahaha, I didn't notice the bonnets. I liked the bustle too though

>> No.7355178

>>7354808
Fuck, it's just a reaction image.

>> No.7355199

>>7354256
I would wear this if it was only a skirt, but the full dress is too busy.

>> No.7355209

I don't get why a lot of people get their frills in a knot when it comes to JJ. Their stuff is usually so ugly.

>> No.7355565

Hideous.

>> No.7355929

>cats with bonnets
>flowers
>red, white & blue ribbons
>cherub
> hell yes

Most of JetJs clipart stuff runs into so tacky, ugly and ridiculous that I really, really want to wear it territory for me. Only the Bach dress was simply ugly.
I just don't want to pay as much.

>> No.7356015

>>7355929
Urgh.... you sound like people who lick Meta's cunt.
>lololol Meta is SO tacky, they don't give a fuck! I love them
>Bodyline is sooooo tacky. Ew

The only real difference is the price tag.

This dress is legit ugly.

>> No.7356023

>>7354256
yea this is a little much. if someone wore this i would not call it lolita

>> No.7356026

>>7354256
To be honest, that's so weird and tacky that I really, really want it.

>> No.7356031

>>7356015
I dunno, Bodyline is kind of bland in comparison? They don't even try to be tacky.

>> No.7356036

>>7354256
I'm confused as to where the "tacky" border runs. I'm sure some normalfag wouldn't rate this as any more tacky than Sugary Carnival or whatever, yet we all agree that this is supremely tacky.

>> No.7356048

>>7354808
first of all
>its a reaction image, dumbass
second of all
yes, I also think its tacky, but that doesn't mean you can't like it.

>> No.7356050
File: 37 KB, 400x410, 1390623472713.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7356050

>>7356023
On what basis???
Its got the silhouette. It can be worn with a blouse. Its the right length. Its from a lolita brand.
I understand salopettes but calling a lolita dress not a lolita dress?

>> No.7356459

>>7354256
I looks like shit.

>> No.7356460
File: 59 KB, 640x480, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7356460

>>7356459
Yes we know you looks like shit.

>> No.7356678

>>7354256
Regardless of who likes or doesn't like the print itself there are design issues:
The bows on the bodice have an unfortunate placement. The cherub's feel are amputated. The irregular waist gathering instead even pleating and the size of the kitten heads makes them appear distorted.
The straps are different enough to feel like an afterthought and do not match the bustle or the ribbons in the print.

>> No.7356693
File: 39 KB, 156x137, cherfeel.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7356693

>>7356678
>The cherub's feel are amputated.
>feel are amputated
>feel

>>this kills the cherub

>> No.7356701

>>7356693
>Argh, typos. haha, yeah. His feels are likely more shitty when footless though. Poor cherub in general.

>> No.7356725

>>7356678
>>7356693
amazing, my sides are now in orbit

>> No.7356741

>>7355209
I like JJ's old school stuff (before they got print-happy). One of they designers is tall, so their items usually are miss accommodating for taller Westerners.

>> No.7356914
File: 158 KB, 714x880, 12033017-image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7356914

>>7356015
Nah Meta is amazing.

>>7356741
This. I love a lot of their older stuff, the prints are too much though.

>> No.7357017
File: 17 KB, 545x528, brown hair do not want.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7357017

Holy shitballs, JetJ. What are you thinking? What are you smoking? I think this is the absolute ugliest print I've ever seen.

>> No.7357038

>>7354256
Really not liking the super plain, squarish bodice.

>> No.7357039

Jet j is so overpriced

>> No.7357047

>>7357039
This is my main issue, really. It wouldn't be so bad if JetJ wasn't basically the most expensive (on average) brand. Maybe only next to Moitie, but I'm not so sure. And for a plain bodice with an ugly clipart print.

>> No.7357105

>>7354256

Su ugly, but I bet my ass it will be sold out within a short time and people will pay a fuckload of money to get it second hand; just like with every other tacky JetJ clip art dress.

>> No.7357121

>>7356914
This to me is way more tacky but then again I have an irrational hatred of bows.

>> No.7357122

>>7357038
Implying JetJ doesn't always do boring, plain, squarish bodices.

>> No.7357127

>>7356741
I wish they would make they're straps adjustable. I'm a tall Westerner and my boobs are not directly under my chin.