/cgl/ - Cosplay & EGL

[Anonymous No.7282688]

Lolitas with bad attitudes.
Tell me about experiences you've had with other lolitas, whether they're in your comm, or online, that have horrendous attitudes.

>girl in my comm claims her DoL Sugary Carnival is the real deal, among other replicas
>other girl in comm calls her out
>"muh AP is real"
>"ur just jelly"
>"ur just a hater"

[Anonymous No.7282763]

>"You don't have to be an elitist brandwhore to be a lolita!"
>"I put this co-ord together from Ikea curtains and local chain-store clothing!
>"Yeah we hate rich brand-loving bitches!"
...
>Six months later
>They're all wearing outdated/unpopular and very obviously used secondhand brand pieces.
>Whenever they pass a normal lolita their faces

[Anonymous No.7282795]

>doesn't wear lolita but runs a lolita advice blog
>screams elietist at anyone who is honest with her when she asks for advice and opinions.
>refers to her landwhale body as God Given Curves that brand whores are jelly of.

I've never met a genuine 'brand whore' of myth, but there's plenty of these dumb itas who are exactly like their stereotype.

[Anonymous No.7282868]

>Pug faced asian brandwhore - 4/10 tops in looks
>Constantly shit talks everybody in the group behind their backs to the mods and a select few.
>Starts shit talking on the Facebook page to girls who are borderline ita, just learning.
>Apparently throws a hissy fit at a high end restaurant about the gratuity fee in one of the most expensive districts in the city. Rest of the group apparently got shit service from it.
>Loses her shit at a girl from the city south of us for asking about cross-posting larger meets to our group as well to expand.
>Leaves negative feedback on a moderator's EGLsales after she rage quits the comm for no reason other than her telling her to stop being rude.
>Rage PM's multiple people in the comm on "her way out" calling them various names and shit.
>Never hosted a meet-up before but apparently thought she was so important her leaving the Facebook comm matters.

I'd post pictures but she's literally hidden every single one of them she can. Just reaffirms my idea that the uglier you are the bitchier you get from self esteem issues.

And all the "itas" she bitches about are progressing extremely fast into proper lolitas and the only legit ones we had only show up to one meet and then drop off the face of the earth.

So glad she's gone.

[Anonymous No.7283046]

>>7282868
People like that make all lolitas look bad. Hopefully she leaves your comm alone for good, jesus christ.

[Anonymous No.7283059]

>>7282868
Lol one of ours regularly deletes her whole facebook then blogs about how we're all bullies even though no one has ever been anything but nice to her. It's cute when people no one cares about think they matter enough for their absence to go noticed.

[Anonymous No.7283121]

i've kind of had the opposite experience

>though someone was a complete snob at first based on comments on comm wall
>got to know them
>actually funny and nice, just come off wrong to strangers

pretty glad I ended up getting to know her, she's really awesome

[Anonymous No.7286684]

>>7282795
I've met some girls who were a bit nutty about MmM and Manabananasama, but all the itas and newbies I've seen complain about ~brand whores~ seemed to be talking about AP and BtSSB. At least, that's what all their super unique high quality totally custom for REAL women dresses were replicas of.

>wore a non-print Baby dress, blouse, head accessory to meet (also shoes and stuff but you know)
>local ita latches on to me to complain about all those elitist brandwhores at the other side of the table
>mfw I have no face

[Anonymous No.7286689]

>>7282763
>>They're all wearing outdated/unpopular and very obviously used secondhand brand pieces.

This rubs me the wrong way. There's nothing wrong with wearing older pieces. Heck, Iron Gate is almost 7 years old and it's super popular. There's nothing wrong with wearing unpopular pieces either. Jewel Tree Bouquet is gorgeous yet unpopular and sells for very little on auction. Lolita clothing isn't disposable clothing like F21. You're not supposed to stop wearing something just because lampshade prints are the new thing and none of your other dresses have lampshades on them.

[Anonymous No.7286693]

>>7286689
I think that anon's point was more that they're shitheads for talking bad about people who wear brand, but then the moment they get a little money for it they leap on (secondhand) brand like a mosquito to an exposed tit.
Hypocrisy is disgusting.

[Anonymous No.7286705]

a group of lolitas told this guy who politely asked for a photo to "fuck off"
when I called them out on it, they all lied about it, saying I was delusional.

one, two itas, whatever, they can be seperated and made fun of.

when you get a group of lolita friends together all lying about the horrible things they have said or done, thats when it gets awful.

I think I remember something similar, wasn't rosaire a part of this, and she and a bunch of other lolitas got exposed for making up lies about other girls?

I thought that shit only happened online, but its even more horrid confronting it face to face.

[Anonymous No.7286710]

>crazy chicks into obscure japanese fashion
>socializing irl
>with each other

[Anonymous No.7286716]

>>7286689
>Jewel Tree Bouquet is gorgeous

[Anonymous No.7286726]

>>7286693
I got that and I hate hyprocrites, I just don't like it when people hate on things because they're not "in". Trends come and go.

>>7286716
Aw, it really is. Maybe you like Little Bear's Cafe though. I hate that print so much.

[Anonymous No.7286732]

>>7286716
>Jewel Tree Bouquet
>thinking its ugly

[Anonymous No.7286743]

>>7286716
it is a really pretty print. sweet without looking like a babies room. (im looking at you every sweet print out these days)

[Anonymous No.7286748]

>>7282688
I recently started making friends with other lolitas, added one girl from our local community and asked her about meets/where she wears lolita. "Oh no, I don't have any lolita clothes! I just like the style!" Ok, though why would one be so active in the comm? Anyways.

Couple of days later she starts messaging me with "my lolita friend wants to sell this and that, would you like to buy?" The clothes are not my style and not my size, so I politely refuse. She messages me every time I'm online "Have you checked the measurements? Will you buy it or not?"
When I ask her to give me contacts of her lolita friend to ask about clothes directly, she ignores it. Girl, there are sale communities for a reason.

And that was a little story of me making friends with local lolitas.

[Anonymous No.7286761]

>>7286732
What's the story behind that pic?
>dat policeman holding her parasol

[Anonymous No.7286776]

>>7286761
it was staged, the girl just posed with her friends for fun

[Anonymous No.7286819]

>>7286726
I'm not too big a fan of the black colourway
LBC reminds me of that radioactive cupcake print, too busy

[Anonymous No.7286851]

I really hate try-hard lolitas that try to be ~so lifestyle desu~. 99% of the time they're also terrible itas to boot.
In particular that osweetprince guy on tumblr.
>im a bibliophile teehee
>ELITISTS!!!
>overly polite and fake sounding syntax out the wazoo
>in reality only has 2 shitty coords

[Anonymous No.7286869]

>>7286726
No one was hating on things because they're not the 'in trends' if anything they were probably wearing the same items they were hating on years ago.

[Anonymous No.7286919]

>>7282763

Here we have the Bodyline brandwhores. Apparently Bodyline is the best brand out there only because of the fact that they are cheap. Some also see handmade as the best thing no matter how shitty the quality. I get you are proud of the effort you put into it, but that doesn't mean it doesn't make me want to burn my eyes out.

[Anonymous No.7286922]

>>7286761
>>7286776
I thought it was for a UK tv show a la Not What to Wear?

[Anonymous No.7286948]

>>7286919
Are you from Russia? I've never seen so many people defending Bodyline or F+F before I joined Russian comm. They say quite often that BL is better than brand design and quality-wise. It makes me cringe even if BL is called 'brand', but I can't say anything or I'll get all the hatred.

[Anonymous No.7287018]

>>7286705
You do realise that supposedly those same lolitas were the ones hosting the tea party and the lolita 101 panels at the same con this guy runs? it seems really weird that he would ask them to come do that for him after they told him to fuck off for a photo. alls I'm saying is that you should double-check your sources, I remember hearing this rumour as well and it sounds like the work of a vendetta-chan.

[Anonymous No.7287050]

Start off with "I hate drama..."

Then posts something that garners attention/sympathy every hour. Throw a hissing fit when people ask "Do you want to talk about it?" or give suggestions.

But hey, she hates drama

[Anonymous No.7287083]

>>7286922
It was The Bill iirc, which is (was?) a sort-of police-based soap opera.

At least, that's what I heard on here.

[Anonymous No.7287090]

>>7282795

Lel, hello Scotlolibro.

Ahhhh, Jodie. What a rare beast.

Super curious as to who keeps posting about her on here though, I had no idea how much she irritated people!

[Anonymous No.7287120]

>>7282688
Lolitas who love the drama, and when they are bored generate drama from nothing. Are stalkers, haters and attention whore with other communities for more than they say they are patriots with their country.

[Anonymous No.7287128]

My favorite is when newbies and itas go to community pages asking if they can borrow peoples brand dresses for cons....um no -_-

[Anonymous No.7287148]

>>7287120
>Are stalkers, haters and attention whore with other communities for more than they say they are patriots with their country.
I don't have an appropriate reaction image on this computer but... what?

[Anonymous No.7287407]

>>7286851
Oh god, that fucking person, always trying to start dramu in our comm.. they need to chill out and stop being an attention whore.

[Anonymous No.7287413]

>>7286689
Like "outdated and unpopular items" in the sense that they wouldn't even shift from a Closet Child sale. You're right, my wording was off. I guess I should have said "tacky, obviously cheap and uncared-for" items.
Basically what I'm trying to communicate is they snapped these dresses up simply /because/ they were brand, because there were no other pros to their outfits.

[Anonymous No.7287414]

>>7286851
are you a cololi or just a curious onlooker?

[Anonymous No.7287579]

>>7282688
>girl in my comm claims her DoL Sugary Carnival is the real deal
I know first hand of a girl who does this. I'm not against replicas, I'm against lying. When she lies and says it's actual Angelic Pretty and looks so gorgeous just like all of my brand...nope. Nope nope nope nope.
Engage the rage.

[Anonymous No.7287626]

>>7286705
I think there's two sides to a story. He seems like a bit of a vendetta-chan himself. Get over it, some girls didn't want a photo taken, they probably had a bad day, he probably appeared to be a bit creepy, now he's going to use his super dooper powers of being con head to ban a bunch of girls he only met once. As if it isn't super creepy to go and SEARCH for these particular girls online as if he hasn't been obsessing about this one incident forever. What a fucking creep, anon.

[Anonymous No.7287826]

>>7287018
>supposedly
so its you

>>7287626

then tell the story, because
>lying about it saying this never happened
isn't gaining you any favors

just tell the fucking truth. seriously, lying is not making you look good, at all. tell the truth.

I don't wan't to get involved further than this because I know you have some serious vendetta history, but please, tell the truth.

[holyshititsthislolcow No.7287931]

>>7287826
I ran into the guy a couple of times. I'm by no means friends with any of the girls in the comm, but let me just tell you, he looks creepy as fuck.
he complained to me about the local lolitas, and told me that story as well.

I met that guy because he followed me around target. the scariest part? he's this creepy and has a girlfriend, wears a fedora, and has memeface bumperstickers on his car. though I agree telling someone "fuck off" is a bit harsh, and it could of been handled a lot better and less rudely, there's no denying that he's a creep.

[Anonymous No.7287980]

>>7287931
Hi Nia

[holyshititsthislowcow No.7288004]

>>7287980
congrats captain obvious

[Anonymous No.7288026]

>>7287018
People don't ask you to hold panels.

You apply for them. Usually over the internet, not face-to-face.

He, or whoever he put in charge of the panels, could have accepted a panel request not knowing who it was.

[Anonymous No.7288153]

I think this says it all. Please, cry harder, bitch.

[Anonymous No.7288172]

>>7288026
it honestly just seems like these anons are just lying more to get out of some shit

[Anonymous No.7288185]

>>7288153
Someone's Pixyteri game is entirely too strong.
PT threw a self entitled, narcissistic bitch fit very similar to this not too long ago.

[Anonymous No.7288196]

>>7288185
Believe it or not, it's not her.

[Anonymous No.7288208]

>>7286948
Really? Russian lolitas always seem godtier with their brand and handmade. Or is that only Moscow and all the other comms are terrible?

[Anonymous No.7288218]

>>7288153
Is this the Atelier Pierrot model-chan from Frill that threw a fit because she couldn't model IW?

[Anonymous No.7288231]

>>7288218
Nope. This was someone's status from not being accepted in a con fashion show, but not Atelier Pierrot model-chan.

[Anonymous No.7288258]

>>7288218
oh god, I wish I saved pics of that, that was fucking amazing

[Anonymous No.7289006]

bump

[Anonymous No.7289029]

I asked a lolita a few questions at a panel once because she was obviously nervous and talked through her slideshow in about ten minutes.

Next thing I know, I'm a 'lolitist.'

Don't host a panel if you don't want questions to be asked, sweetheart.

[Anonymous No.7289046]

>>7288208
Pretty much that. There are itas and just plain girls with boring coords as well. They just don't get posted much. Pict related - mod of one of the online communities (if I'm not mistaken).

[Anonymous No.7289049]

>>7289046

I was going to get that dress in black and wear a white blouse under it...but now I think a bolero would go way better.

Thanks!

[Anonymous No.7289092]

>>7289046

I don't get how somebody became a mod sometimes...
One in my comm doesn't even have any actual Lolita shoes, not even something loliable like oxfords, she wears flats.

[Anonymous No.7289095]

>>7289092
>flats

All my fucking rage I hate flats.

[Anonymous No.7289099]

>>7289046
>dat hair
>those glasses
She has a cute face, but she didn't even try to do hair or make up. I don't get it.

[Anonymous No.7289111]

>>7289099
>She has a cute face

Wut

[Anonymous No.7289129]

>>7288153
>>7288196
>>7288231
Wow, she sounds almost exactly like PT here. Is she a genuine lolcow or was this just an outburst? I want deets but I don't want to upset Gmork.

[Anonymous No.7289133]

>>7289099
>>7289111
She looks exactly like an old English teacher of mine. In fact, she resembles him more than his own sons do. She even has the same glasses.
It's weirding me out.

[Anonymous No.7289135]

>>7289099
>She has a fat face
fify

[Anonymous No.7289144]

>>7289099
She doesn't have a cute face. Or at least my definition of "cute face" is different from yours. But that's not my point, not everyone is naturally beautiful, but you can do something with your hair, makeup and such . What's the point of wearing a pretty dress when you don't bother to do any of that?

So not every Russian lolita is godtier, some of them look like this. Not especially bad, just plain IMO. There are more gems in 'handmade' albums in Russian comms. Not everyone is like Lieschen.

[Anonymous No.7289160]

>>7289129
This person has been causing a bit of drama in her comm, and she's a fairly new member. She's a bitch that doesn't know how to keep her mouth shut online, and is stupidly defensive about anything that could be taken even remotely negatively. When someone asked her to take down that status before the con heads saw it (the girl has one of them on FB), she flat out refused and said she was leaving it up.

Basic bitches be basic, I guess.

[Anonymous No.7289182]

>>7289160
What kind of drama?

[Anonymous No.7289212]

>>7289182
Nothing big, just small things like her rubbing people the wrong way, getting mad when people correct her on simple things and trying to be a know-it-all tough guy. It's piling up though, and she isn't liked by many people, from what I can tell.

[Anonymous No.7289337]

>>7289160

isn't it the Kai Narita person? The scammer with lolita "personas" for every outfit? She threw a similiar fit if I remember correctly.

[Anonymous No.7289376]

>>7289337
No, it's not Kai either. It's no one notable, as much as she'd love to be, just some entitled bitch in a comm I'm in.

[Anonymous No.7290481]

>>7287148
>I don't have an appropriate reaction image on this computer but... what?
What?

[Anonymous No.7291858]

>>7289376
90% positive I know what con fashion show this is. That thing generates more drama and hissy fits in the whole state than it should. People take it way too seriously.

[Anonymous No.7292917]

One girl in my comm I thought she was ok. Misunderstood and wrongly hated. But lately I've come to realize she's a huge cunt. Whenever you have a disagreement with her she starts talking like she's right, and becomes a complete ass. Then goes on about how much smarter she is than people in her age group,but honestly she's like ever other typical teenager.

[Anonymous No.7293051]

>Be in Hollywood for meetup
>Group disperses to eat wherever they want
>End up with girl with shittiest attitude
>Turns to guy were sitting with, "Wow, great service huh?" with our server within an earshot just because he didn't immediately ask her if she wanted a refill.
>Is generally unpleasant
>Drama ensues with several lolitas from two comms
>"Lolitas are fucking psycho"
>"Leaves" lolita, was never really lolita to begin with, just a really bad jfashion wearing idiot.
>Good riddance.

[Anonymous No.7293177]

>>7286705

Is this that old ass Memphis drama that has been run into the ground? Because if it is, holy shit you are just looking for reasons to be mad. That story has been proven as bullshit years ago vendetta chan.

[Anonymous No.7293855]

>>7288153
Her birthday meet up only has one other guest. Hopefully bitch takes a hint and stops being so annoying.

[Anonymous No.7293895]

>>7287090
Wish people would stop posting her, she doesn't deserve the fame even if it's for being shit.

[Anonymous No.7293898]

>>7293177
>proved bullshit

nothing is "proved" by anons, caps are more proof than anything.

[Anonymous No.7294008]

I actually don't care about brand vs. offbrand vs. homemade as much as everyone else seems to. I just go for what looks nice and fits the theme I want, nothing more.

This has lead me into conflict with people more than once, and some people seem to think I have a bad attitude because I'm not all "PRECIOUS BURANDO" whenever someone shows off their new brand in a bad way, or cheer on and encourage people who wear offbrand.

Do I have a bad attitude?

[Anonymous No.7294014]

>>7294008
DEAR LORD I want that dress

[Anonymous No.7294064]

>>7294014
It's a coat, anon, and I think it's by 4 O'Clock.

[Anonymous No.7294068]

>>7294014
SO DO I. It's my dream dress.

[Anonymous No.7294070]

>>7294064
4 O'clock
more like empty wallet o'clock, amirite?
though she is couture.

[Anonymous No.7294080]

>>7294070
Empty wallet indeed, anon. Although, that coat is only around £500, I think. You could probably get a scarf or a t-shirt in Alexander McQueen for that much. For couture, she's pretty inexpensive.

My heart yearns for pic related. One day, one day I will have £850 to drop on a single dress.

[Anonymous No.7294106]

>>7293895

Yeah, I agree. She's irritating but not that irritating.

[Anonymous No.7294119]

>>7293898

The screencap above is merely gossip between two people on Facebook. I sincerely hope that you're not insinuating that that's solid proof.

[Anonymous No.7294154]

>>7287083
>that
>on The Bill
yeah no

[Anonymous No.7294163]

>>7294070
Her quality is amazing.

[Anonymous No.7294931]

>>7286761
The 'policemen' are actors. From 'The Bill'.

[Anonymous No.7294943]

>>7294070
Dumb question but something just has to be detailed and custom sized to be couture or does it also have to be made w/o a sewing machine?

[Anonymous No.7295119]

>>7288218
Can someone fill a Slowpoke in on this?

[116 No.7296778]

How do you make a picture like that?

[Anonymous No.7297356]

>>7295119
Seconding this

[Anonymous No.7297367]

>>7294943
sewing machines are allowed

[Anonymous No.7299167]

>>7288172
some other midsouth lolita group was supposed to do the panels but dropped out at the last second. the con head knew some of the local girls through his staff and asked them to fill in.
there was absolutely no drama that I know of except for where this other group flaked out.

[Anonymous No.7299184]

>>7299167
you're kinda making yourself look bad by calling out your group and letting it drag on.

[Anonymous No.7299535]

>>7289092
>>7289095
Does flats mean like those cheapo plain shoes they sell at the mall for $20 or just shoes without heels? I wear pretty much exclusively flat/heelless shoes because of my height but I also go through the work of finding as close to brand-style as I can, just minus the height.

[Anonymous No.7299551]

>>7299535
Cheapo plain shoes. The main issue with flats discussed in these threads is that they lack structure or appropriate details. The ugly ballet flats that girls roll up in purses to wear after work/nights out.

[Anonymous No.7299548]

>>7294943
It means detailed, one of a kind (usually), very high in quality, and with a lot of hand finishing by the designer themselves. A sewing machine can certainly be used but its usually only considered couture if it was all the designer's own work, from the first sketch to the last stitch.

[Anonymous No.7300106]

>>7289046

D'aww. I think she's cute.

[Anonymous No.7300373]

Holy shit you guys are retarded like seriously lolita isn't even cosplay you're just dressing up in stupid outdated clothes you retards are so desperate to belong to something you inaccurately brand yourself lolita which i doubt any of you are anything but used up whores or fat bitches with a Napoleon complex

[Anonymous No.7303314]

>>7287931
>tfw when I've met the con head and confirmed for not a creeper
>tfw he has a wife and kids
>tfw he runs his own business
>tfw I've never seen him in a fedora
>tfw one of the lolitas worked for him for at least the first year of the con that I know of

are you sure that you have the right guy?
I mean I know you hate your old comm and all but you're not at all subtle about it and it sounds like some creeper was just pandering to what he thought you wanted to hear.

[Anonymous No.7303329]

>>7303314
you're talking about this>>7286705
right?
he's clearly not the con head. maybe she was talking about the guy that wrote that.

[Anonymous No.7303483]

>>7303329
guy who wrote what?
As far as I know, the only male in the story is the supposed 'con head' who >>7286705 claims was insulted by the local community. to my understanding, the actual con head has not written anything on the subject, nor has he behaved in a way that indicates he holds a grudge against the party that is being blamed. Nia/holyshititsthislolcow's post seems to be attempting to verify the rumour's authenticity by claiming she heard it directly from the guy who originally went through the experience, if I'm not misunderstanding things. But it seems weird to confirm a rumor without any source more reputable than 'this creeper who followed me around target once', if that's so. The facebook screenshot might be a tad more believable if it contained any proof or details, like dates/names/locations that could actually be inquired into and verified. it's all just much too vague to take seriously right now, sorry. esp. considering nia's presence & track record.

[Anonymous No.7303725]

>>7303483
nia here. talking about the guy who wrote that screenshot. not the con head.
I only recognized his icon, and this is the same story he told me. I really don't care about this shit, just coming in to say that guy who wrote that is kind of creepy.


guy who wrote that isn't the con head.
he said "he" not "I" and he used quotes to say what the con head supposedly wants to say to these girls.

but, if OP wants to drag it on, whatever. glad I'm not in that city anymore.
I'd advice OP to not drag it on though, it will end badly for them, and this is coming from experience.
and I'd also advice the girls from the city to not drag it on anymore as well. it could of gone as an anon screenshot that was ignored, but everyone made an unnecessarily big deal about it and named what location the problem was at. never a good idea.

[Anonymous No.7304171]

>>7303725
aah, that explains it. it wasn't mentioned anywhere else in the thread that groudon-icon was a male, so I just assumed you were still talking about the conhead.

...which, knowing now, makes that rumour sound even less trustworthy. I wonder if this means that groudon-kun just made his first foray into /cgl/.

[Anonymous No.7304190]

>>7300373
I don't even know what this post is addressing but you sound really mad.