[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/cgl/ - Cosplay & EGL

View post   
File: 382 KB, 647x435, soedgydesu.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6771509 No.6771509[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

Anyone else think this video was as stupid as I did?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=vHjcreUGBfo


Also general egl 'wtf moments' thread.

>> No.6771568

I actually found it kind of cute, and heartwarming, in a way.
shout out to my personal vendetta chan, amber, who felt the need to derail my Ita thread. please girl, get some help. I'm 90% sure you search for my trip just to start shit.
also, apologies to those who had their fun ended early. I'll start a new one in a week.

>> No.6771577

Too lowbrow for me.

>> No.6771582

Wig snatching was pretty funny.

>> No.6771583

I wtf everytime I see anons derailing threads because someone they don't like posted.
>tempted to namefag to prove a point

>> No.6771586

I didn't get how it was vendetta...doesn't that term mean like...that the other person didn't actually do anything wrong? It's usually just jellyfags who are trying to start shit that doesn't exist. This video seems to be more of a 'don't talk shit about people being shitty to you' and a slap on the wrist to btb and us.

>> No.6771589

>>6771583
>tempted to namefag to prove a point
Do it.

>> No.6771593

>>6771589
stfu u h0r

>> No.6771594

Okay, Nia, honey I like you, but calm down a bit please. We don't need idiots getting their way. I

>> No.6771595

>>6771568
no omg youre just gross

ps im not ur vendetta chen

>> No.6771598

This was an ok concept I guess? I'm not sure what point it proves other than angry bitches don't have thick skins, but there was no resolution...she just got angry, posted shit and then someone said 'kill yourself' and she was friends with everyone again like normal. What the fuck was the fucking point?

>> No.6771596

>>6771594
Its a wtf thread and appropriate. It seems the idiot got their way because I can't even find the thread.

>> No.6771601

>>6771596
I mean with all this bullshit.
>>6771593
>>6771589
>>6771583

>> No.6771600
File: 25 KB, 300x300, 0893.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6771600

I hate these kinds of videos.
Girls getting on their high horses trying to prove a 'point' and pretending like they've never shitposted or said anything mean about someone else.
>vendettachan
>guy fawkes mask
>BtB

Always makes me laugh how people play it like they think drama is soooo silly and then prove they practically live in wank communities. Hypocrites.
If you don't like drama then don't surround yourselves with it (you know, kind of what like functioning adults do?)

>> No.6771607

>>6771600
They're attempting to make vendettachans rethink their actions before they follow through.

>> No.6771612

>>6771607
Even though nothing actually happened to her that was so bad. Omg anon told me to kill myself! Either you kill yourself at that point or you grow a pair and keep doing whatever it is.

>> No.6771613

>>6771607
It's not their job to be everyone else's moral compass and "educate" people on what kinds of decisions they should be making.
Don't stick up for this crap, it's stupid.

>> No.6771615

>>6771613
Why is trying to set an example all of a sudden a shitty thing to do?
>>6771612
Anon told her to kill herself for being a vendettachan. I can't tell if you're missing the point, you got the point and you don't like it, or you just don't like how they went about it.

>> No.6771619

>>6771615
>Why is trying to set an example all of a sudden a shitty thing to do?
It's not until people like you come along and say "Well this is how everyone should behave like," uh no. People are going to make the decisions they do regardless of your silly little Youtube videos.

And I tell you right now: If some people could just learn to pick their battles and ignore stupid shit like "hurr kill yurself" the community would be so much better off.

>> No.6771622

>>6771615
The video teaches people that you should continue your shitty actions until someone else says something about them and then you should stop and pretend nothing happened.

She didn't learn a lesson, she didn't lose her friends, she didn't get kicked out of her comm, she didn't get outted as the one posting shit. Any of those things would have made the video better.

>> No.6771626

>>6771619
I never said that people aren't gonna do what they do. But trying to set an example shouldn't be looked down on.
Sure, this probably won't change anyones mind. but I think its nice to see people acknowledge a problem and say something about it.
>face your issues
>people like you
People like me? Who thinks people should do better and if they don't, that's fine?

>> No.6771628

>>6771622
Let me guess, disney also taught you to be a sad little princess in order to get married?
Jesus tits come on, you know that's not the point.

>> No.6771635

>>6771628
I'm not really even sure how to respond to something so stupid.

This is a video trying to raise awareness and promote good morals, like videos telling you to brush your teeth.

This shit is like one of those videos if they had the main character eating candy all day and not paying attention to his teeth and then getting a cavity until someone says brush your fucking teeth and then his cavity disappears.

All this fucking video's 'point' is, is that there are shitty anons on behind the bows who tell you to kill yourself, and that you should listen to them and then all the bullshit you did to people is null.

>> No.6771636

>>6771626
>>6771628
Are you one of the girls in the video or something? Why do you care so much if whether or not we "get" the point of the video or even if we like it?
No, we "get" the point, but we still think you're retarded.

>its nice to see people acknowledge a problem
They're not the first to speak out about what a vendettachan is. Stop aggrandizing yourselves.

It's not a serious issue and it never has been. Go find something better to do with your time ffs.

>> No.6771643

I'm going to rehash what others already said in that this video had a really shitty conclusion.

It had like 'repent your sins and you'll go to heaven' tier morals at best.

Also, holy shit, how fucking hard is it to unplug a keyboard so the person you've zoomed in on typing is actually typing? That was laughable at best, the cinematography was pathetic.

>> No.6771645

>>6771636
I'm responding because someone quoted me and were discussing the video? I care because this is a discussion and seeing someone say something that isn't right id like to correct it.
>they're not the first
Never said they were, I think anyone taking a step in the right direction deserves praise.
>I don't like this topic, stop responding
If you don't like the topic, hide it. You act as if I'm not doing other things in addition to.

>> No.6771647

>>6771645
You should just go delete your shitty video right now. Oh I know! Kill yourself idiot-video-chan! Now you have to change your ways right? Just like in the video.

>> No.6771648

>>6771645
>I care because this is a discussion and seeing someone say something that isn't right id like to correct it.
Haha but you're wrong and nobody gets why you're whiteknighting this hard over it. Can't you just accept someone has a different opinion of your little video and walk away? Aren't you supposed to be "setting an example"?

Oh and please respond to these
>>6771635
>>6771643

>> No.6771652

>>6771647
4chan is an 18+ site.
>>6771648
I'm not? I just think its nice. I can't say its nice without it turning to a full blown argument?
>>6771635
I never said it was advertising on a grand scale like you seem to think I'm saying. Its a cheaply made video addressing a not so pressing issue.

>> No.6771654

>>6771652
>I'm not? I just think its nice. I can't say its nice without it turning to a full blown argument?

And we can't say it's shitty and give our reasons without you protesting that "NO U GIES UR WRONG"? Seriously right now?

>> No.6771659

>>6771652
But you didn't just say it was nice, you started quoting others and acting as if you were doing some kind of good deed and 'protecting the world from evil'. Seriously, it's you who needs to calm down, the video is shit, it's an interesting concept with an awful execution. It's got no resolution, a weak premise and the actual video itself sucked.

And right now all you're doing is making yourself seem as if you had a hand in it's creation, which, if you did, good for you. No one cares, you threw in your 2 cents, now take your little opinion and go.

>> No.6771662

>>6771654
Did I say something to that effect? Did I go out of my way to say that to someone? No.

All I did was respond to this
>>6771600
With
>>6771607

I also said that if people are gonna do what they do, that's fine. But it'd be nice if people better to their own kin.

>> No.6771663

>>6771659
I only quoted one personn everyone else quoted me.

>> No.6771665

>>6771654
Guise, she's not gonna listen to us, we're all vandetuh-chens! We're evil!
>>6771652
>4chan is an 18+ site.
>what are sarcastic backhanded comments?

>> No.6771666

>>6771662
>Did I say something to that effect? Did I go out of my way to say that to someone?

Uh, you totally did here (>>6771645). Yes.
>I care because this is a discussion and seeing someone say something that isn't right id like to correct it.
Not to mention this entire time you've been screaming that nobody gets the "point" of the video.

>> No.6771670

>>6771663
>I only quoted one personn everyone else quoted me.


No...I mean...you quoted someone about it in the first place. You were the first person to start commenting on others' comments. You didn't just say hey! I like this video. No, you had to explain what the point of the video was.

>they're trying to make vendetta-chans think before they act.

Okay, cool. You didn't just leave it at that. You responded to every single person who say anything.

>> No.6771672

>>6771663
Whoops hit submit too soon. I never went out of my way, I'm defending my oppinion (which seems to be unpopular) its fine if you didn't like the video. I also didn't help (knew that was gonna happen)
Againn if you thought it was shit, that's fine. I still think its nice that there are attempts made to address an issue.

>> No.6771676

>>6771672
You started out by going out of your way to try to explain the context of the video and the message it was trying to portray by quoiting someone else with your explanation.

>> No.6771679

>>6771676
This! Oh wow are you stupid.

>> No.6771680

>>6771670
>you shoulnt have quoted them in the first place
...why? I just wanted to say one thing then it exploded. It wasn't even offensive.
>you explained the point of the video
Yea?
>you responded to everyone
No, I only responded to those who responded to me. Then someone asked me to respond to more people.
I'm not on a warpath.

>> No.6771682

>>6771676
Follow the trend of comments, I did not go out of my way at any point. I only every quoted one personn from there its like a normal discussion. Someone talks to me, I do the same in return.

>> No.6771687

Fuck lolitas. Can't have one lolita thread without it turning to shit.

>> No.6771688

>>6771680
If you are going to misquote me atleast fix the spelling errors.

Also, when someone only quotes half of something to try to make their point it completely destroys their credibility.

I said right in my post you responded to everyone who said anything to you.

>> No.6771689

>>6771682
>Follow the trend of comments, I did not go out of my way

Responding to everyone who is quoting/responding to you is going out of your way. There's not a written rule saying you need to respond to all the posts that quote you, you know.

>> No.6771697

>>6771687
It's just the idiot white-knight video maker/friend of theirs.

Getting back on track, what's up with that girl and her "Omg why do people make zippers this way!"

Clearly because they hate you.

>> No.6771695

>>6771688
What do you want me to respond to in your post that I hadn't already?
I'm not really fretting over credibility here.
Yes, I did respond. Aren't I supposed to? Otherwise I get directed to do so like this person did
>>6771648

>> No.6771700

>>6771695
You're an idiot and you only responded to half of some of my posts, plus nowhere did I ever say you shouldn't do anything. I just stated that you had done something. Your reading comprehension is fairly juvenile.

>> No.6771702

>>6771689
I respond because I want to. If they didn't want a response they wouldn't quote, right? But the way you put it then everyones going out of their way to talk to me. I assumed that "out of your way" meant I responded to every single post posted.

>> No.6771706

>>6771702
>i assumed
>sfhffdhjfj
>i'm arguing something that i didn't even have a clear definition of
>i'm an idiot

>> No.6771709

ITT: little "anti-vendetta-chan's" first time on 4chan.

>> No.6771710

>>6771700
Read your own post, you made few points and I responded to all of them.
>comphrehending
Pfft. Cute. Kettle, black.

>> No.6771714

>>6771710
>ignoring the question.

Did I ever once say that you 'shouldn't have responded'? Yes, or no?

>> No.6771718

>>6771706
>you're dumb!
Clever. But no, my response is still valid
>>6771709
Nope.
Are we really still arguing that I responded to posts? Were not even talking about anything related anymore.

>> No.6771723

>>6771714
>you quoted someone about it in the first place
Are you saying I shouldn't have? Yes or no?

>> No.6771727

>>6771509
I love this !
You all say this cause usually come here for vendetta. Just sayin'

>> No.6771728

>>6771723
I was simply stating a fact.

It was infact you who quoted someone in the first place, and in doing so you caused others to quote you. Should you have done that? I don't fucking know, why the hell would I know, I'm not you.

The very idea that you think I was trying to tell you what you should or shouldn't have done is just that, it's what you assumed. But I never stated one way or the other.

>> No.6771740

>>6771728
Anon, al I have to go off of is the tone of your post. The tone of your post is very condescending and of course I'm lead to believe that you're against anything I've done/said.
You still didn't tell me what I ignored from your post and I don't even know what this is about anymore.
That I'm still talking, that I even quoted anon, that vendettalolita should be a coord, don't know.
Moving on.

>> No.6771753

>>6771740
Not even that anon, but she was just answering your question. You're putting words and feelings into other peoples' mouths. And that's a big nono on the internet. I would get out of the thread now to save face.

Not to mention the fact that you are literally responding to every person who's said anything to you shows that you're new or really just plain stupid.

>> No.6771758

>>6771740
>That I'm still talking, that I even quoted anon, that vendettalolita should be a coord, don't know

What?

>> No.6771769

>>6771753
I'm not stuffing words into their mouth, I'm not leaving thread to save face- I'm an anon for shits sake its not like anyone knows who I am if I ever post again. So, fuck that. If I leave, I leave on my own time. Also, fuck you. Ill respond to whomever I damn well please. If it annoys you so hard hide my comments its pretty magic.

>> No.6771778

>>6771769
>I'm an anon for shits sake its not like anyone knows who I am if I ever post again
We know you're one of the girls in the video.
Lol.

>> No.6771781

>>6771769
>i'm not going out of my way
>goes out of my way
>i can act foolish if i want
>i'm not acting foolish at all
>i'm going to blatantly defend something tooth and nail
>this is unimportant to me
>i'm just an anon
>i responded systematically to everyone who directed comments to me
>fuck you!
>i'm a hypocrite

This thread is just gold, keep it coming.

>> No.6771789

>>6771778
Sure why not.
>>6771781
Never went out of my way, never said anything about being foolish (though this entire thing is getting there pretty fast. So fuck it.) Were not even discussing the video at this point, wwere apparently discussing that I responded to people and responding methods. Where am I being hypocritical? Nice that you tried to pull a list out of your ass anon. Its cute.
>gold
Yea, yea it is.

>> No.6771797

>>6771789
So, you're just really going to respond to anyone?

>> No.6771803

>>6771797
Don't see why that's a problem. Its stupid to think someone who responds to me wouldn't want a response themselves. I'm actually surprised that it apparently annoys people.

>> No.6771816

>>6771803
Who's dick do you get to suck if you continue making an ass out of yourself?

>> No.6771827

>>6771816
Yours.

Saging for late but obvious reasons

>> No.6771949

>>6771509
None of her videos are funny. They really just seem like sad grabs for attention. I don't normally watch them, but for some reason, I figured "maybe she finally did something I can relate to."

But nope. Just more of the usual with inappropriately placed music and bad acting.

>> No.6771955

>>6771586
I didn't get that either. Confront people with your problems? Sure. Good advice. But most vendettas/shitposting doesn't start from a personal relationship.

It's like saying to someone "you need to confront your abusive boyfriend!" and that person saying "I don't have a boyfriend. That guy has been stalking me for months, but I don't know him otherwise."

>> No.6771958

>>6771949
This music really pisses me off here. It's about snow white, it couldn't have been less appropriate. Bitch needs to keep away from my Kanon Wakeshima.

>> No.6772004

Now that this has quieted down some...any other gripes or wtfs?

>> No.6774218

>>6771568
but Nia, you are the real vendetta chan.
this thread looks pretty much over, but since you started it with such a blatant beg for sympathy & attention, let's clarify something here at the end: your entire local community dislikes you for the shit that you've spawned over the past few years. there's a reason why you have haters, & there's a reason why the only 'support' you've gotten is from girls on the internet who don't know the whole story. I think that's all that needs to be said.

>> No.6774220

>>6774218
There's no reason for dat horseface.

>> No.6774236

>>6774218
wait, what. can I hear the whole story?

>> No.6774265

>>6774218
>stalks Nia online
>makes multiple hate threads on her
>derails a fun thread simply because Nia created it
>searches for her trip to follow her around /cgl/ saying "horseface" and "cunt"
>"bawww but I'm the victim!!!"
you gotta be shitting me.

>> No.6774282

>>6774236
Last time it was brought up on /cgl/, the topic started a bit of a shitstorm both online and off. The girl who was harassed just wants to forget the entire thing happened, so out of respect for her, I'd rather not open discussion again.
Just letting you folks know, take everything Nia says with a grain of salt. If she's really got a vendetta-chan, I feel like they deserve one another.

>> No.6774291

>>6774282
Awe, there's no tl;dr you can give me?

>> No.6774298

>>6774282
who was harrassed? I'm confused
I'm pretty sure Nia's not lying about the vendetta chan though. who'd be that pants-on-head retarded to start arguments with yourself to that extent for attention?

>> No.6774316

>>6774291
ask Nia herself next time she appears. she's suprisingly level headed about the whole ordeal. (better person than me)
apperantly her and her comm got into an argument over "the meaning of the word otaku" because some chick called all Otaku creepy molesters. just search her in the archives if you want to find the wank threads made by someone from her local comm. its pretty awful.

>> No.6774379

>>6774291
seconding >>6774316
the archives speak pretty well for themselves, I think.

>>6774298
I have no idea. but she doesn't exactly seem mentally stable, from what I know.

>>6774316
This may sound naive, but I'd be really surprised if any of the wank threads were actually made by members of our community. Most of the girls don't know Nia personally, and the few who do have sworn off contact because of her behavior. That's why it seems really weird that she thinks she has a vendetta-chan when everyone here really just wants to avoid her forever.

the confusion arose over the japanese definition of otaku, btw. Nia interpreted the word 'otaku' to mean 'all fans of anime', when really the individual was referring to otaku as judged by Japanese standards of behavior within the culture--i.e. 'those guys who buy naked body pillows & collect action figures of scantily-clad cartoon chicks, right?', which seems pretty creepy to the average non-fan.

But that was apparently enough for her to write the entire community off as anime-hating, racist jerks and deride us as such on 4chan.

so make of that what you will.

>> No.6775025
File: 305 KB, 500x405, gettin real tired of your bullshit.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6775025

>>6774379
Yeah nah... You're the cunt here.