[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ]
2022-11: Warosu is now out of maintenance.
2023-08: Search exclusion terms should be working again.
2023-08: Some posts were not showing up due to incorrect caching responses. This is now fixed.

/cgl/ - Cosplay & EGL

View post   

File: 773 KB, 1080x1921, wveiw4osf5ka1.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10840421 No.10840421 [Reply] [Original]

>> No.10840423
File: 212 KB, 1533x2048, 7weeh2dqlsja1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>> No.10840424
File: 1.29 MB, 3000x4000, vz63ik9jl1ka1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>> No.10840425
File: 75 KB, 301x560, 1677636208191.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>> No.10840426
File: 510 KB, 2448x3621, 6g1ob6cs42ka1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>> No.10840427
File: 1.11 MB, 3024x4032, 2k3c4oqqkeka1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>> No.10840428
File: 591 KB, 2160x2880, nx5eu8ycyeka1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>> No.10840429
File: 477 KB, 1536x2048, B1544DF9-C19E-46C3-9E14-412C30929DB1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>> No.10840431
File: 373 KB, 1536x2048, 713DCD40-2944-45A6-8133-D37F8683A251.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>> No.10840435

Is this that one Texas lolita? She’s huge!! I guess everything is bigger in Texas

>> No.10840436

nitpick this is fine besides the dumb poses

>> No.10840437
File: 135 KB, 824x935, 1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>> No.10840438
File: 142 KB, 1080x747, 4.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>> No.10840440
File: 532 KB, 828x618, 02A030FA-C6EC-4827-AB37-60463F6C63DC.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Lor fans are huge itas no exceptions

>> No.10840442
File: 959 KB, 828x1005, 87BD2491-1E10-400C-92EF-6F2D072D13C8.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>> No.10840443
File: 341 KB, 1000x1198, wtf.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

not a coord but wtf is this shit

>> No.10840448
File: 473 KB, 1470x1838, FpfxOE_XoAAhQ5R.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>> No.10840449
File: 506 KB, 1956x2608, jzgvkk0q56ha1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>> No.10840450
File: 691 KB, 1844x3277, 8ad9ndtrl3ha1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>> No.10840451
File: 1.04 MB, 3780x2540, O41Wi2p.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>> No.10840452

You seriously need to get your eyes checked if you think left girl is a nitpick. It’s not counting her fugly face either.

>> No.10840453
File: 390 KB, 1440x1801, FpHsjo9WYAEZiCc.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>> No.10840455
File: 2.73 MB, 1536x2048, 333761690_2241296139386310_6137490004394680569_n.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>> No.10840456
File: 946 KB, 2000x1500, o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>> No.10840458

Nitpick. It’s an average looking comm.

>> No.10840461

Not my fault the avg comm looks like THAT kek

>> No.10840462

They’re not eye-searingly ita. Scroll up to see better examples of what to post next time.

>> No.10840463

Which one are you?

>> No.10840465

I’m not an Amerifat. Sorry you’re new and don’t understand the difference between a nitpick and an ita. You’ll learn with time so good luck with that.

>> No.10840466

Why else cap this hard for random itas? One girl is wearing a t-shirt ffs. Sorry for your shit taste nonna!

>> No.10840468

These are completely fine

>> No.10840479 [DELETED] 

Literally wearing a terrycloth headband meant to pull back your hair while you're washing your face as a fashion statement...

>> No.10840481 [DELETED] 

Seconding this. Stupid poses and unfortunate faces =/= ita

>> No.10840482 [DELETED] 

Girl on the left looks fine from what little we see of her coord. Some bangs could really help her out but that's just a nitpick.
The girl in mint doesn't seem beyond help but she's got a long way to go and is currently ita. The rest...there's no helping them, especially the redhead in the middle.

>> No.10840483 [DELETED] 

The girl on the front left is ita. The rest of the girls in front are nitpicks at best. Everyone in the back you can't see properly so you can't really gauge if any of them are itas or not.

>> No.10840488

Oh no you’re actually retarded. Me calling them average and nitpicks doesn’t mean they’re wearing stellar coordinates. They’re mediocre at best. The ones in the back aren’t even visible. Your post reeks of vendetta.

Here’s an example of a group of itas since you’re helpless. >>10840440

I’m sure you meant to say cape instead of cap but don’t worry since you doubled down on your retardation.

>> No.10840490

>average looking comm
Suddenly I don't want to be apart of a comm. They all look pretty rough except for the far right girl and the asian girl in the middle

>> No.10840492

Wow I've never seen a moite brand ita

>> No.10840498

yeah its impressive how bad this is

>> No.10840503
File: 228 KB, 1440x1440, aristokyla-02-03-2023-0001.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>> No.10840504
File: 286 KB, 1440x1440, theruffledrose-02-03-2023-0001.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>> No.10840505
File: 259 KB, 1440x1800, replica_heart-02-03-2023-0001.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>> No.10840506
File: 676 KB, 1440x1800, divalila_fashion-02-03-2023-0001.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>> No.10840507
File: 232 KB, 1280x1600, thedevilscreampuff-02-03-2023-0001.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>> No.10840508
File: 132 KB, 1080x1080, ametyst.fashion-02-03-2023-0001.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>> No.10840510
File: 317 KB, 1440x1698, aylamezurashii-02-03-2023-0001.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>> No.10840511
File: 490 KB, 1440x1800, _chibibie_-02-03-2023-0001.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>> No.10840513
File: 275 KB, 1333x1667, gomizugamisama-02-03-2023-0001.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>> No.10840514
File: 155 KB, 1080x771, jfashion_mt-02-03-2023-0001.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>> No.10840515
File: 284 KB, 1440x1800, purrblind-02-03-2023-0001.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

How the fuck do you ever think that a Hot Topic dress makes for a good old school piece

>> No.10840516
File: 193 KB, 1440x1440, laprincipessaracconta-02-03-2023-0002.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Nightmare fuel

>> No.10840517
File: 203 KB, 1440x1440, laprincipessaracconta-02-03-2023-0001.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>> No.10840518

she doesn't even look like the same person. Like the person on the right looks like she has down's syndrome.

>> No.10840519
File: 90 KB, 1080x1080, lumi_lolita-02-03-2023-0001.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>> No.10840520


we shoot the men, it's justified as self defense against these images.

>> No.10840521
File: 589 KB, 1440x1440, julesgurumi-02-03-2023-0001.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>> No.10840522
File: 279 KB, 1440x1440, peachblossomjump-02-03-2023-0001.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>> No.10840523
File: 190 KB, 1440x1723, hiyori_sternfunkel-02-03-2023-0001.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

God I hate troons

>> No.10840524
File: 65 KB, 1063x1063, jenny_meifen-02-03-2023-0001.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>> No.10840525


>> No.10840526
File: 155 KB, 1080x1080, cupcake_kamisama-02-03-2023-0001.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>> No.10840527

I'll give you >>10840429 but the rest... Are you blind retarded or both?

>> No.10840528
File: 367 KB, 1440x1526, elyachan-02-03-2023-0001.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>> No.10840529
File: 462 KB, 1440x1800, iampersephonie-02-03-2023-0001.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>> No.10840531
File: 363 KB, 1427x1786, fifilefromage-02-03-2023-0001.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>> No.10840532
File: 279 KB, 1080x1341, pinkfrillydream-02-03-2023-0001.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>> No.10840533
File: 331 KB, 1440x1440, mimicatbats-02-03-2023-0001.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>> No.10840535
File: 1.40 MB, 720x1600, Screenshot_20230215-202712.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Nouji is real, and I can't believe the original post got so many asspats on the Lolita Subreddit

>> No.10840539

Female r*dditors will never not bend over backwards to asskiss a moid doing the bare minimum.

>> No.10840542

Disgusting fetishist. He sent Fluffy Kawaii Jo a message to show her feet on Instagram and she did.

>> No.10840546

what cardigan is this? so cute

>> No.10840558

I just don't think that fat = ita

>> No.10840559

Why on earth would you wear those fluffy ear-like head accessories when your face already looks like that of an anthropomorphic rat?

>> No.10840563


>> No.10840564

Someone get that thorn print skirt out of there, I've never seen a worse coord with the print

>> No.10840565
File: 90 KB, 500x667, 1F5147EC-4946-4CC7-87D3-EF28A18D007A.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

May I introduce you to the French Moitie ita? She has a great collection of old Moitie and never coords it well. She used to dm other Moitie lolitas and act unhinged. She was posted here a lot.

>> No.10840579

I can't believe she's still at it

>> No.10840588

WHAT? Pls post receipts to the farms.
Your real upset by this kek. The left side of the pic is totally cursed suck it newfag

>> No.10840589

This is like the third time you’ve posted this vendetta chan. We can’t even see their coords.

>> No.10840590

this pic sums up why public meets aren’t a thing any more in one single ita af image.

>> No.10840592

This jacket is so wonderful. I wish I could steal it from the ita

>> No.10840612

This is cute.

>> No.10840616

(Whips out magnifying glass) Nope, still can't see shit. Get better photos or quit your vendetta, pick one.

>> No.10840630

It's a new release, just buy it
the green is even on discount

>> No.10840641

This is fine if she’s new. she needs to tuck in her blouse and get shoes that go better with sweet, but if we posted everyone at this level the thread would be full in a day.

>> No.10840645

Do you see how cheap everything in her coord is? This is not fine even if she is new. You can be a newlita and do your research + have standards.

>> No.10840665

What you can see is a steaming pile of shite. Absolutely poggers that any sane person would defend these three.

>> No.10840666 [DELETED] 
File: 40 KB, 427x381, 4flche.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

That word doesn't mean what you think it means. Have your granddaughter take you back to bed, grandma.

I don't like the coord in question either though, even from the side the fit looks a little off with the shape. But you can hardly see enough of everything to call it all ita.

>> No.10840698
File: 392 KB, 1536x2048, 52424787-D834-466C-978F-9ED96F64C225.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>> No.10840713

this may be ita but it's fucking hilarious and awesome

>> No.10840715

Based and not ita. Seethe harder jealous Stacy.

>> No.10840719

Based I love it

>> No.10840722

This is the average shit talking gull, notice all the pats, don't judge your comm when you look and act like this.

>> No.10840724
File: 807 KB, 1639x2048, Tumblr_l_16261357670354.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

A casual coord apparently, but why all the black with such a pastel JSK? Also lol at not even taking the mask off for a picture in which she is not near anyone..

>> No.10840727


>> No.10840728

Why is this ita? Looks like an okay goth coord to me besides her being a bit chunky and the makeup is a bit garish

>> No.10840729

shoehorned black aside i can't get over the blouse choice. so frumpy

>> No.10840730

The blouse and socks are deep black and her JSK is mint and pink. Do you honestly think that's okay?

>> No.10840731

Nitpick. Just say you’re jealous of her next time.

>> No.10840733

i quite like the black blouse, it wouldn't work with a brighter jsk but because the colors are pretty subdued it works

>> No.10840734

I really... don't think that's how that works, but we will have to agree to disagree, nonny, I'm happy you like it.

>> No.10840736
File: 865 KB, 1536x2048, Tumblr_l_25650156089637.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Looked further at the tumblr and this is actually the same person... the mask actually did wonders. Person in pic was actually some kinda boygirl with a little creepy moustache

>> No.10840738
File: 745 KB, 1536x2048, Tumblr_l_25849205871124.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>> No.10840764

I've only posted it once kek
Jealous of the lard stuffing her ham body into clothes that don't fit her or the two ugly itas in the back?

>> No.10840765
File: 227 KB, 1440x1800, qydesa0rjaka1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>> No.10840767
File: 1.23 MB, 2268x4029, kd9vv0hnxgka1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>> No.10840768
File: 984 KB, 3000x4000, esz8zp0f8rka1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>> No.10840769
File: 509 KB, 1920x2560, xabvnyq3fmga1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>> No.10840772
File: 340 KB, 1536x2048, 4xh9acc28fha1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>> No.10840773
File: 766 KB, 1788x3890, 54namx2n8jha1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>> No.10840774

I’m pretty sure she’s not a lolita, just a cosplayer. I’ve seen her on Twitter and she’s never posted anything EGL on there. So I can excuse it because she clearly doesn’t know what she’s doing.

>> No.10840775

This has already been posted last thread

>> No.10840776


>> No.10840779

She got worse lol

>> No.10840782

Oh my gosh.. this girl is in my comm or in a neighboring one, I think? Small world. Dress is hilarious lol she has a good sense of humor.

>> No.10840783

Stop with your vendetta. You can’t see anything in that image so they probably look fine

>> No.10840788
File: 235 KB, 1080x1568, Fatty-chan spam.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

I'm sorry, but dogpiling/asking for plus-sized options on a small, Japanese brand's page will always be ita.

>> No.10840791

gonna get your orbiters to spam report this thread too?

>> No.10840793


>> No.10840794
File: 421 KB, 1536x2048, 809B622E-473C-466E-8744-D22F4F9647E7.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]


>> No.10840795
File: 376 KB, 1536x2048, A623629F-C7D9-4450-9B61-132D529A96F9.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>> No.10840797

the wall is somehow the least disgusting part

>> No.10840800

The fact that her "brand" gets invited to do fashion shows at cons shows the absolute state of lolita fashion kek

>> No.10840801
File: 411 KB, 1536x2048, F25FFF90-4AC0-4DE4-B76C-49B7E59E3E60.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

it just keeps coming

>> No.10840809

You can tell some people see themselves only in terms of CalArts animation

>> No.10840813
File: 1.85 MB, 1290x1608, 62EFA3F1-40D7-467F-9B3B-47F75888DB7F.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

How fucking fat do you have to be that this OP doesn’t fit as a dress? It’s hella huge

>> No.10840817 [DELETED] 
File: 454 KB, 430x532, lardass.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Hi Liv, please lose weight because you're stretching out your brand

>> No.10840818

Is this thread satire? I dont remember ita being... this...

>> No.10840823
File: 968 KB, 626x885, lul.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>> No.10840824
File: 445 KB, 2048x1356, it1499108428956.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Remember that fat is ita no matter what

>> No.10840826

Being what, newfag? Learn to integrate and how to reply to posts next time.

>> No.10840827
File: 45 KB, 600x600, 1515877763550.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

What do you mean?
This is genuinely repulsive. The Claire's tier ageplayer backpack, the dirty Dollskill clearance section stripper shoes, the solid sissy tights stretched too thin over their cellulite ridden legs, the greasy unkempt roots halfassedly obscured only by a cheap Aliexpress beret, the man-pissing-in-the-woods power stance, the fact that they're all a scant breeze away from their asses and coochies being on full display... It's too much.

>> No.10840828

stop responding to wk bait

>> No.10840830

Are you really that mad she can afford the brand you can’t? Kek.
She’s not even that fat compared to the majority of Texas girls anyway.

>> No.10840831

i'm glad i'm not from texas, kek

>> No.10840837

Just because you can zip up the dress doesn’t mean it fits. I’m doing one hundred squats so I don’t wind up like this, nonna.

>> No.10840839

Kek projecting onto me isn’t going to make her any skinnier or protect her from the beetus anon. But you’re welcome to tell the entire Texas comm to go on a diet

>> No.10840840

Woof. Thats pulled really tight. Can she even breathe?

>> No.10840844

Is she... wearing her skirt backwards...?

>> No.10840853

Lol the belts and gloves even, that fucking rocks

>> No.10840863

Are you that mad that you cant afford brand?

>> No.10840864


>> No.10840865

Imagine affording brand and all that food to shove down your throat but not being able to afford an iron.

>> No.10840867

Are you projecting?? Brand isn't that expensive

I wish you landwhales would stop treating indie brands like mass production machines. Demanding to be catered to over something you chose to be.
Some brands may never make plus sizes. But you can always lose weight

>> No.10840869

I’ve witnessed this a few years ago. Even the Texas Mods are fatties

>> No.10840872 [DELETED] 

There are like 6+ comms in Texas not just one, you're talking out of your ass.

>> No.10840894
File: 118 KB, 640x800, 332291646_1427224261017260_3310849064107384197_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>> No.10840897

crack den but make it kawaii

>> No.10840898

the headbow is the most insane part of this, why is it made of hair???

>> No.10840899

I like the idea, if it was otome with nice hair/wig and better designed skirt print, it would be cute and so much better than these mushroom hat tiktok lolita coords.

>> No.10840915

How come we never see itas wearing 2+ petticoats? Is that just a scenario too absurd even for itas?

>> No.10840925

This used to be common before organza petticoats were the norm. Even so, it's an acceptable hack to fill out a heavy dress. If it's an appropriate volume, you can't tell.

OP pic is lampshading because the shape and length are wrong.

>> No.10840939

Remember back in 2010 when Lady GaGa wore her hair in a bow shape? Claire's then sold clips of wig fiber in bow shapes and I think I may still have one rotting away somewhere. God knows how he managed to find on in Current Year

>> No.10840946

Is that an Inu Yasha light switch or am I losing my mind

>> No.10840947

you can still find them easily on aliexpress etc

>> No.10840948

looks like it

>> No.10840949

I’m surprised this hasn’t nuked the thread yet. As bad as this is, quit beating a dead horse. We get it.

>> No.10840964

I hate awful neo-"oldschool" so much. Oldschool is about the small details and even tiny things being off can make the whole thing look wrong.

>> No.10840965

Stop bringing it up retard

>> No.10840972

ok but i honestly love this

>> No.10840974

Do coords like this even count as oldschool. Every though everything is new and it's just black and white. Wouldn't every coord be oldschool under a monochrome filter
I hate neolitas

>> No.10840975

Based yugioh appreciator

>> No.10840977


>> No.10840992
File: 340 KB, 1326x2048, C02EAE52-4415-4701-9D7A-ABB39EC18316.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>> No.10840997

>the leg hair

>> No.10841001

you have to be baiting

>> No.10841027

This is cute, just don't label it as lolita and it's a nice "cute outfit"

>> No.10841035

she definitely is a lolita, she just mainly posts it on her fashion instagram rather than her mains

>> No.10841038

ew this coord would actually be so cute on someone suitable. putting on the clothes does not magically transform you - that's what hairstyling, make-up, and razers are for. only above-average people can get away with natural hair and no make-up in such a high-maintenance style. shrek in a meta dress still going to look like shrek, regardless of gender.

>> No.10841050


>> No.10841058


>> No.10841084

Texas girls don’t know about the Streisand effect and it shows. Screeching for gulls to stop talking about double penetration princess will only make them do it more.

>> No.10841085
File: 231 KB, 1440x1440, petite_tomoyo-04-03-2023-0001.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

How does this girl have the gall to e-beg for money? How embarrassing

>> No.10841088
File: 147 KB, 1080x1080, ago.filo.e.nuvola-04-03-2023-0001.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>> No.10841089
File: 1.96 MB, 1080x1350, melikestea-04-03-2023-0001.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>> No.10841090
File: 103 KB, 1080x1080, a.penguins.fashion-04-03-2023-0001.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>> No.10841091
File: 346 KB, 1440x1800, jupiter_jellyfish-04-03-2023-0001.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>> No.10841093
File: 228 KB, 720x900, gutterluvclub-04-03-2023-0001.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>> No.10841094
File: 214 KB, 1440x1440, teseyafairy-04-03-2023-0001.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>> No.10841095
File: 651 KB, 1440x1800, aghatine-04-03-2023-0001.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>> No.10841096
File: 365 KB, 1440x1440, floofvoid-04-03-2023-0001.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>> No.10841097
File: 351 KB, 1440x1440, x_haro_x-04-03-2023-0001.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>> No.10841099
File: 224 KB, 1440x1381, ketchupkarol-04-03-2023-0001.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>> No.10841101
File: 122 KB, 900x961, __carnival_doll__-04-03-2023-0001.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>> No.10841102

> "petite"

>> No.10841116

Funnily enough, if she never got the last thread deleted, nobody would have bothered to post that pic again. And now it's right at the top too kek

>> No.10841119

I like this one, they're well dressed

This is awful, what event is it supposed to be?


Nobody is jealous of a morbidly obese ita anon

>> No.10841120


>> No.10841124

This is amazing but I hope she swaps out the white blouse for something black short sleeved, it would be better as an edgy punk coord

>> No.10841129

She looks like she’s suffering on the inside. I imagine it’s painful to be in such an obese body .

>> No.10841131


This is shocking, what are they thinking? There's got to be a point when you realise the dress is too short/small for you and it should be well before your vulva is hanging out the bottom of it

>> No.10841133

You have some awfully low standards anon

>> No.10841134 [DELETED] 

No one in Texas is defending DPP and any other discordgate ringleaders except herself and her other bully friends who also got banned or reprimanded from their local comms so hard they had to try to start their own comm and scrub their old personas off the internet.

>> No.10841154
File: 2.03 MB, 1290x2163, 413B92BC-9242-482D-9A37-28FE55E90379.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Pretty sure your bonnet doesnt sit on the back of your head, fatty

>> No.10841155 [DELETED] 

this reeks of vendetta

>> No.10841157

She obviously wanted to show off the buns and that's why she moved the bonnet. It wasn't a good decision imo, and she is bursting at the seams, but this isn't ita level imo.

>> No.10841167

Wait sauce? I heard a rumor she dandy was involved but this is the first I’ve seen of it on here. Is that true? Tbh I’m super disappointed

>> No.10841168

Also, someone out their new group so we can shit on them non stop and see how they like it. That was fucked up.

>> No.10841178 [DELETED] 

DP/Dandy Puppeteer the indie brand is not at all connected to discordgate. DPP is Dreamy Pastel Princess, an individual. Get your acronyms straight anon.

>> No.10841188

Why are there so many troons on /cgl/

>> No.10841195

Not in America and don't know any of these people, but jealous of bloatmaxing chan, really?

>> No.10841196

If she did intermittent fasting she could probably save enough to pay rent in LA.

>> No.10841197

imagine being this vile to follow them and take a screenshot from their stories

>> No.10841198

As for the lolita comm; one possible reason is that they fucked up so bad in their local comm or the online comms they frequently posted in that they got kicked out. Or they feel unwelcome simply because people aren't kissing their ass as much as they thought they would and they get actual concrit. They typically retreat to reddit and CGL because they feel safer with the anonymity. Some of them self post here because they still need the attention.

>> No.10841201

she looks cute idgi nonny

>> No.10841245

You’re jealous because she has many dresses and she’s well-known on TikTok. Why else do you keep reposting her? It’s been months. Give it a rest jealous chan.

>> No.10841251

I used to follow her on insta but had to unfollow because almost every post she makes comes with an insane political rant about stuff she clearly barely understands.
I wish she wouldn't virtue signal so hard because she does have some nice coords

They tried to start their own comm, what happened to it?

>> No.10841261

She didn’t like that picture you responded to and she had it deleted. She posted it to her own Instagram so what is the issue dpp? Are you mad? Kek.

>> No.10841279 [DELETED] 

>They tried to start their own comm, what happened to it?
No idea, I just know that the one who previously went by rosequartzroyalty posted on CoF in the last couple months about meeting up with her comm, but she was banned from her usual comm if not most of the active ones in Texas. So she must have made her own separate one with people who don't know about the discord stuff or straight up lied about it and is actually just a lonelita.

>> No.10841280

The coord is ita, but I really love the silhouette here and that print is neat

>> No.10841312

No it was just unhinged Dallas

>> No.10841316
File: 89 KB, 1280x720, maxresdefault (1).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Why would I be jealous she can eat for free at the Heart Attack Grill

>> No.10841319 [DELETED] 

Dallas was the one comm she definitely banned from, if not others. She didn't even live in Dallas but went to their stuff all the time and got officially banned at the same time as DPP. Dallas itself isn't unhinged. People involved in discordgate (among other things that have already been relayed here and on the farms before) were the ones making Dallas seem so crazy when really it's a huge comm with mostly normal people.

>> No.10841351

>Dallas not unhinged
>comm member literally brought bedbugs to a meet

>> No.10841366

How do you bring bedbugs to a meet? Was it a swap where they brought an infested trunk?

>> No.10841375

What is the name of her dress? That is such a neat theme.

>> No.10841386

They were crawling on her and she thought they were ants and posted to the Facebook group the next day saying they were bedbugs

>> No.10841396 [DELETED] 

Yikes, I stand corrected. From the outside looking in they all seemed normal beyond the already known cows.

>> No.10841406

She was removed as a moderator in the Houston comm after 1 day of being a moderator. She’s a massive ita

>> No.10841408

Neat, that’s beyond disgusting.

>> No.10841431

The bed bug ita was a mod? Wft were they thinking?

>> No.10841438

Imagine being so brainrotted that you prioritize Lolita over getting a new mattress. They're literally the same price or cheaper than new brand dresses

>> No.10841447

From what I understand she got them while traveling but still
Shell out for a good hotel

>> No.10841454
File: 316 KB, 3355x1250, 326477297_2212147188990903_5916667579882596946_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

It's slavic bestiary by lady sloth. The ita that was posted wearing it is the model that they've chosen for the dress on their facebook page which probably wasn't a good idea.

>> No.10841456

Expensive hotels aren't safe from bedbugs, you can even get them from movie theatres, trains, etc.

>> No.10841464

lmao no.

>> No.10841466

Could the anon who made the compilation on lolcow please make another one of the Brianna ghey rant and the rights for trans kids rants next to each other?

>> No.10841468

How do y'all not know what bedbugs are? They can come from any soft surface, thrifted clothes are another big source but they can come from waiting rooms and other places with couches also

>> No.10841474

I'm not on tiktok and who cares how many dresses she stretched out? The only ones upset this gets posted are her fellow amerilards.

>> No.10841479

google is free

>> No.10841495

I hate this one with a passion like how dare you have a username that refers to being small when you’re that fucking big. Worst part is she’s local to me. Never seen her in the wild but I know I most likely will next convention urgh. And how can she have that many followers? Paid and the unpaid ones are all fat they have to be

>> No.10841502

Not very related but I hate the shape of the skirt on this release; it feels like the hem is way too small for how full the pleats are. I get they want to show the print but you know there's going to be an influx of overstuffed ballooning skirts with this series.

>> No.10841509

So its more acceptable to beg for money if you're thin?

I don't understand your comment, does she need money because she's fat..?

>> No.10841512

Nta but she consistently has new pieces and can have brand heavily altered. It's more the principle of her grifting when she can afford to buy two of the same brand dress in order to alter them into one tent that will fit her.

>> No.10841518

they're replicas

>> No.10841520

LMFAO that makes it even better, her fucking empire is built on lies

>> No.10841544

And she wonders why people are mean to her. Replicas in the lolita community is practically theft

>> No.10841548

It's worth noting the replicas she buys are quite expensive, almost as much as a new brand dress if I recall correctly

>> No.10841549

Lmao yes

>> No.10841550

That just makes it sad honestly… replicas and they’re more expensive… at this point just buy from the small indie ig brands that make beautiful dresses even in her size

>> No.10841558

>Never seen her in the wild
like in a nature documentary

the petti is too voluminous for the skirt, probably because like you mentioned they want to show off the print.

Nearly everything she owns is a replica, she defends her use of them by saying she bought all of them 10 years ago.

why is it worth noting she overpays for replicas?

>> No.10841562
File: 145 KB, 1440x1440, petite_tomoyo-07-03-2023-0001.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>e-begs for money as an online """content creator"""
>her content is her dressed like shit while somehow having the confidence to make lolita videos

and you see no problem with this? I also didn't even talk about her being fat when I posted the photo lol

>> No.10841572

second anon here. I don't follow her because imo her content is boring so I don't know how she's begging and what she's begging for. If she's saying "I have unexpected vet bills/health costs/can't make rent, please donate" and posts it in lolita spaces (like her local comm) then yes I think that's really annoying, but if she's like "visit my patreon if you want more content like this" (on her own socials) like a lot of other people then I think that's fine.

I also think she is providing a community service of some sort, hear me out please. So she dresses pretty badly and her content is boring, we can agree on that I think. A lot of us complain we don't have as much quality lolita content as we would like right? One reason for that is likable well dressed lolitas often have low self esteem and think no-body wants to hear their opinions on stuff so they don't start blogs, tik toks or youtube channels even though others think they're likable, dress well and have interesting things to say. They could look at her, she has fun and obviously doesn't gaf and feel a bit more confident and might consider making some good content. We would all be better off if the audacity and overconfidence of certain content creators was equally distributed amongst people who are more deserving and who would do something good with it.
But how can any discussion about her be complete without mentioning the little/ddlg stuff?

>> No.10841586

This is somehow both god-awful and extremely charming at the same time.

>> No.10841588


What lol. I have never seen this fatty anywhere but on this site. She's not exactly a kawaii ambassador or model. I would think the only people who can be called owner of a lolita empire is Misako, Isobe, and Kato-san

>> No.10841599

>petite tomoyo
She larps as a small girl and as a Japanese? Not to mention she wears replicas in 2023? Where are the wokefags to cancel her?

>> No.10841601

>Where are the wokefags to cancel her?
they're on her side because they claim we should be more understanding of people who have almost no options outside of custom size replicas.

>> No.10841608

Is no one going to mention that she's a ddlg fag

>> No.10841618

here >>10841572

>> No.10841623

I feel like we'll dressed likable Lolita's don't make content because sites 4chan and lolcow are always so hungry and hell bent on finding SOMTHING about them even going as far as to make things up or nitpick tiny little things out of vendetta jealousy
So it's fair for someone to not want crazy rumors about themthem
I see it happen to often

>> No.10841628

That's a great point.
I've also seen a huge increase of lolitas who simply don't want to be part of the community at all anymore. One reason is that if there's comm drama it spreads very quickly internationally through platforms like TikTok, it makes the idea of being part of a local comm less appealing. Another reason is that people got used to not going to meets during lockdown and they eventually realized they were getting all of their comm needs met online. There was less of a reason to spend time and money on socializing with other lolitas irl. You might not even like 80% of the lolitas who attend your local comm meets. And also who wants to go to a meet, have your picture taken, then other people from your comm post those pictures elsewhere and mock you? You're not safe even if you're not ita. You will be scrutinized anyway. That doesn't sound like fun to me. Of course I'm aware that if you post your own pictures online that still happens, but you're much more in control of how you appear. I'm not talking about filters/editing, but about lighting, angles, wardrobe choices that look great but aren't all that comfortable for meets, etc. You get to appear your best in your own pictures, not subject to weather conditions or someone else's crap photography skills. You can also block people online. Or apply a digital sticker to your face for added privacy.
You are much more in control of your experience online than you are irl at meets. If a loud rude person shows up at the meet you can't just swipe left.

>> No.10841630

I'm way less worried about seagulls than being seen in public with the typical western lolita. What if a coworker saw me hanging out with loud, dangerhair, genderspecial taobao hamplanets? It would ruin my reputation. They're also just not great people to be around.

>> No.10841631

>dangerhair, genderspecial taobao hamplanets

lol, exactly, you don't decide who else shows up at meets. Not only will you be seen in public with them, but you also have to suffer at the meet being in their company.

>> No.10841647

This is the age old paradox on here. Only the craziest most foam-at-the-mouth e-fame hungry people will put up with the costs of attempting to make lolita content. Yet, gulls complain on here constantly about not having good content, when the existence of this site is a non-trivial contributor as to why people don't find it worth it.

You'll never make any real money doing this, but you will lose any shred of online privacy and get constant shit from rando fatties and neckbeards on here. Who would sign up for that?

>> No.10841652
File: 2.16 MB, 1047x2373, 9BDE3BEC-EC23-4DAD-A06A-8359479C67E8.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

How has no one posted this thing yet

>> No.10841656


>> No.10841670 [DELETED] 


>> No.10841680
File: 184 KB, 1080x1618, FB_IMG_1678180113716.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

how a face can make a perfectly lovely coordinate instant ita.

>> No.10841681

yeah it's the face that's ita and not the ugly unstyled cosplay wig and giant arts and crafts project fork

>> No.10841696

This photo makes me uncomfortable. It looks like a high school but the person in lolita looks like an adult. It's very creepy and I also wonder why they are treating fashion like a cosplay

>> No.10841699

Nothing wrong with having a ugly face as long your body is thin, can't be helped you were born like that, but damn most of these are fat on top of that

>> No.10841721

Definitely not the face that makes it ita

>> No.10841723

it's not the face, it's the styling of the face. in lolita it's customary to either cover the brows or have thin brows, plus have long or fake lashes. it's ok to have unconventional features, and it's ok to not style your face if you're conventionally pretty, but you can't have unconventional features and get away with not styling them.

>> No.10841726
File: 31 KB, 512x384, download (1).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]


>> No.10841729

This is cute

>> No.10841730

nayrt but nothing they said was bait. I completely agree, some false lashes and a decent wig would make her face look prettier.

And lose the stupid fork obviously, but we're just talking about the face right now

>> No.10841740

I see. Then I guess we are reverting back to 2014 lolita cosplay standards

>> No.10841742

Forreal, whenever I see posts of local lolita meetups theyre either all ugly and/or fat. And its not from a lack of pretty and thin popular local lolitas. The good ones just dont show up to these cringe fests and have private meets with close friends. Im thin and not ugly so I’d rather die than show up with these uggos who probably have obnoxious personalities due to the cards they were dealt when they spawned. These type of people are often more bitter and aggro toward conventionally attractive people so yeah no I’ll stick to private meets with the good influencers thanks

>> No.10841743

other than the shitty wig (which we keep talking about) and the fork (also talked about) it's literally just an AP set. so i don't know what you're sperging about but you should spit it out instead of giving retarded vague statements like this

>> No.10841745

Cute. The prop is fun. Not ita in the slightest.

>> No.10841765

okay but I love the idea, and the execution isn't that bad.

>> No.10841770

It’s called OTT newfag

>> No.10841772 [DELETED] 


>> No.10841776

Outside of custom sizing, do any non-itas like Glittertale? Some of their basic blouses look tolerable, but I think I've only seen one good print from them ever.

>> No.10841777

Literally what are the anons going on about with saying it needs more makeup and false lashes.
I've seen so many good coords ruined by shit stupid makeup or random bright coloured lipstick.
Someone not having the ideal makeup is not a problem to me and just an annoying nitpick. I say cosplay standard because it's back to that. The makeup isn't enough. The wig also isn't enough. The entire outfit needs to be coorded exactly right or it's ita.
Kind of mindset that used to be the standard back then basically turning lolita into cosplays

>> No.10841778

They are terrible quality

>> No.10841785

Thank fuck our comm banned him

>> No.10841788

So you're saying the entire outfit is ita, yet the unflattering makeup, wig, and fork are "nitpicks" and not the problem.

Again, it's just a set. So what else are you sperging about? The mediocre blouse? That would probably be the biggest nitpick.

>> No.10841790

lol no

>> No.10841792

So, what kind of mental disability does this guy have?

>> No.10841802 [DELETED] 

Prop is cute.
Do the bangs need to be styled? Yes. Do they need some makeup that better flatters their features? Also yes. But that alone is not enough to brand this coord as ita.

>> No.10841804

This kind of coord is frustrating and you see the buzz it's generating is because it's so close! So close to being basic, but extremely cute.

This is all it boils down to. She needs to wear bangs and makeup that frames and flatters her face better. Each person has different facial features so the goal needs to be to find what is flattering on herself. Girl in the pic if you're here, please take note! Try out different bangs and makeup styles. You can do it!

>> No.10841806

stop WKing for your friend. she has a hideous wig and a tacky prop. wearing a set and ruining it with literally everything else is not some accomplishment

>> No.10841808

I see you’re new enough to not know big props and scepters were common in OTT sweet. Take your L newfag.

>> No.10841825

it looks like a 10 year old made it for their school play retard

>> No.10841827

Zoomer please. Fuck off already.

>> No.10841829

Literally nothing else about this coord is OTT and it's a hideous prop

>> No.10841830

Do I just have shit taste? I think the wig is cute. I mean, its on her head sideways and the bangs need to be cut.. but other than that is this really what we consider a bad wig these days? Or is it just those issues?

Reminds me of the 2014 - 2015 era when every other coord had a ridiculous sceptre for no reason.

>> No.10841831

Yes it looks awful. Not just the cut, the quality

>> No.10841832 [DELETED] 
File: 11 KB, 237x211, 1678180191596658.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

kek nothing says OTT like a normie blouse, jojo siwa hairbows from claire's, no makeup, no zero jewelry, and a ratty wig she was too lazy to even cut bangs in.
absolutely malding

>> No.10841833
File: 11 KB, 237x211, 1678180191596658.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

kek nothing says OTT like a normie blouse, jojo siwa hairbows from claire's, no makeup, zero jewelry, and a ratty wig she was too lazy to even cut bangs in.
absolutely malding

>> No.10841834

What on earth do we consider good then? Natural color, doesn't look super shiny, waves are cute imo. I mean its a bit ratty on the sides, but any plastic wig will be?

...I'll see myself out I guess.

>> No.10841836

Seconding that the quality is bad. Materials were cheap and the seam allowance isn't enough, I got a hime sleeve blouse and the weight of the sleeve was pulling holes in the fabric where the sleeve attaches.

The fabrics are thin and gross feeling so it's no surprise that they tear easily. Very disappointing when you can get secondhand brand blouses with minor wear and tear for the same price

>> No.10841837

Only thing I disagree with here is "no makeup" because she's obviously wearing lipstick, but yeah this is absolutely not OTT at all.

>> No.10841838
File: 19 KB, 236x314, d0ffb0c51e8d99b157ed62ae287b1584--kawaii-hairstyles-hairstyles-for-short-hair.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Meaning eye makeup of course.

>> No.10841842

the most embarrassing part of this is that someone freehanded painting fucking circles.

>> No.10841846

I hate her so much. I laugh in delight every time I see her on an ita threads because it’s where she belongs. I’ve never even spoken to her and I just can’t stand her

>> No.10841847

Furry leg warmers are a plague

>> No.10841872

this is why oldies need to stay tf out of lolita.

>> No.10841876
File: 1.47 MB, 1125x1898, E6C7707F-EE53-437D-BFC7-BA84C364C61D.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

How can you make such a bad coord while having a MmM JSK and an Atelier Pierrot headdress?And the peeking petti...

>> No.10841877
File: 1.41 MB, 1125x1909, 064C3B73-EC61-4275-959E-D48205ACDC10.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>> No.10841878
File: 1.21 MB, 1125x1923, 6AA1A35F-E5B3-465B-BA3C-D8931B069EB6.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Have another Tik Tok ita. So sick of these kids buying their shit out of aliexpress.

>> No.10841880

Can’t believe people are still buying that dress

>> No.10841884

You do realize that normies can't tell one loud, dangerhair, genderspecial taobao hamplanet from a superior taste well dressed lolita, right? We all look like clowns to them.


>> No.10841885

the leg hair is fucking terrible, and this is coming from someone doesnt shave legs or armpits and doesnt believe that women should. but this guy needs to do something. just wear skin toned tights like the rest of us under your socks or shave????

>> No.10841886

nitpick, i dont get the make up but it looks like they got their face painted at an event. just need the whites to match better

>> No.10841887

this wasnt posted as lolita, its defo jfashion. not ita, chill out

>> No.10841888

Point out which part of her outfit is Japanese

>> No.10841893

They absolutely can tell the difference, they just don't know why one looks better that the other

I believe she's a woman on testosterone and that's why her leg hair is so intense, she's extremely annoying because she seems to make body hair the focal point of most of her coords

>> No.10841906

at least she's cute so there's room for improvement

>> No.10841911

Based opinion. I can’t stand her but Im gonna work with a friend of hers it’ll be hard to hide the disgust on my face when she’ll inevitably approach

>> No.10841933

>body hair the focal point of most of her coords

I can't stand this person so I blocked this creep's accounts everywhere I saw them and could block them.

>> No.10841943

It’s not lolita but it sure is ugly

>> No.10842025

Is this person XY? That would explain the weirdly unfeminine face.

>> No.10842042

I'm saying
>Needs lashes
Is the most stupid concrit I have ever read

>> No.10842057

this looks like a fucking corpse

>> No.10842062

it's OTT, it needs lashes.

>> No.10842194 [DELETED] 

Some women are just ugly anon. Don't let the internet ruin your perspective on what cisgender women look like or how masculine they can appear.

>> No.10842228

Its the makeup. This… thing… is definitely using the palest fondation ever when their skin is probably dark

>> No.10842237

go back

>> No.10842315
File: 27 KB, 500x600, bamAdBfFp2EMRoBjPsi1SeBUzHdgCtl4F6Mlh5Ij.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Okay, genius.

>> No.10842360
File: 279 KB, 725x770, Screenshot_20230309_155853_Chrome.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Um, no.

>> No.10842372

trailer trash phenotype

>> No.10842392

Very obviously dyslexic. I never spent much time around him but he also seemed autistic. He openly admitted to being into sissy porn but in the end he got banned for being straight up rude to the organisers of a big event. He now seeks out more public "alt" fashion groups (think kooky vintage) consisting mainly of older women who would have no clue about his past.

>> No.10842395

>He openly admitted to being into sissy porn

omg I laughed so hard. I'm pretty sure this guy is intellectually disabled.

>> No.10842400

cool I didn't know AP was still making roomwear!

>> No.10842424
File: 112 KB, 640x796, 5b6d8fe79effbc0a67d148e1e0a3a9bfcb48ab3e73e9fb1b9c19ec3940207ff9_1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]


>> No.10842447

striped socks are ugly. they will always look like those cheap Amazon ones that femboys wear.

>> No.10842519
File: 20 KB, 250x333, majestic stripes.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

those are fighting words

>> No.10842630
File: 1.09 MB, 1170x1213, 64F023B6-1C53-4D20-95D0-45A65D09F2F2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>> No.10842682

Why is this Violet Fane print so difficult to co-ord? I don't think I've seen a single good one

>> No.10842716

Are those satin slides!?

>> No.10842744

If you think that’s mint you’re colorblind, anon. It’s grey.

>> No.10844527

what's with the dante inspired coord?

>> No.10844550

look at the hands and side of the face, this is a black man

>> No.10844552

it's not difficult to style imo, it's just this tasteless pig that has no petti, fishnets, slides that show off her disgusting toes, the ziptie halo, clown makeup with BLUE blush and i think painted on nostrils??

makes the transvestite shrek beside her look acceptable compared to her

>> No.10844580

justin bieber hair

>> No.10844836 [DELETED] 


>> No.10844952
File: 586 KB, 750x1150, A4260394-87D1-49AF-A64D-68BD8FDAFDE6.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

They called it… clown ouji… the fucking aliexpress thigh highs