[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/cgl/ - Cosplay & EGL


View post   

File: 158 KB, 467x897, jenni.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10306335 No.10306335[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

At most cons, there are rules and limits on how skimpy you outfit can be. So why aren't there any rules how flabby you can be while walking around in public?

https://www.strawpoll.me/19097469

>> No.10306398

Did you get bored of asking about panty lines?

>> No.10306572

>>10306335
>why aren't there rules?
because the tiny percentage of people who are fat because of medication and not because they eat like pigs will sue the convention for discrimination. As they should.

>> No.10306583

This poor girl retired from cosplay like 10 years ago and this dude still talking about her ass

>> No.10306597

>>10306583
Scrotes are a strange species.

>> No.10306634

I mean technically a private event like a con can make up whatever rules they want for who can attend as long as they don't discriminate against actual federally protected groups like race, sex, etc. So a con could hypothetically instate a BMI limit if they wanted to, and the result would be business suicide. It would completely obliterate their reputation and people would choose not to go even if they were thin because it'd be a fucktarded, needlessly exclusive rule, and they'd lose out on a ton of money because turns out most people don't actually care about the presence of fat people enough to bother shunning them from an event like a convention. But if you don't want them at your con, then legally there's nothing stopping you from starting your own con and banning them. If you think it's a good business move then go for it lol.

>> No.10306797

your other thread(s) got deleted for a reason anon please stop doing this to yourself

>> No.10307037

>>10306583
Her ass looks alright to me tho

>> No.10307086

>>10307037
It's a hank hill as

>> No.10307094

I ended up having a dream about a panty line thread last night

>> No.10307095

>>10307037
It's flabby as fuck. The rest of her isn't too bad, but she's got some nerve to walk around in that outfit with a butt like that.

>> No.10307096
File: 69 KB, 722x960, 0a6b33d3f1cd18e6ee73b5ed6923688f.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10307096

Blueberry poster needs to come back

>> No.10307099

>>10307086
>>10307095
Post ur ass then

>> No.10307101 [DELETED] 
File: 62 KB, 379x376, half-jeans.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10307101

Not mine (I'm not a whore), but this is much better

>> No.10307104
File: 187 KB, 773x1240, 99105af7c4506ab61b87aaf54f2bfaf6.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10307104

>>10307099

>> No.10307105
File: 215 KB, 492x293, 1479784762073.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10307105

>>10307101
>>10307104
>changes tactics
>gets exactly what they want

>> No.10307106

>>10306335
Because it would be PR suicide and incredibly bad for business.

>> No.10307108

>>10307094
Based

>> No.10307115

>>10307104
Eww

>> No.10307228

>>10306583
Unfortunately she also retired her web site.

>> No.10307250

>>10306335
Anon, this has been the fourth post this week alone with this picture. I know I've seen it way more times than that this month too. Give it a rest. No one gives a shit about anything you post.

>> No.10307251

>>10306797
When will the mods nuke this asshole already. I'm so tired of seeing this poor Samus cosplayer.

>> No.10307253

>>10307250
I remember regularly seeing this poor girl years ago too. I don't know why this anon has such a long-running vendetta against her but I'm tired of the constant insult fishing.

>> No.10307255

>>10307250
you don't understand, this person has been posting this SAME picture, usually the SAME thread topic, for YEARS

I'm actually surprised it's not the usual "how to hide panty lines" bullshit but

>>10307251
mods its been years please make posting samusass.jpg bannable

>> No.10307390

>>10307253
She retired after being called out as a racist

>> No.10307527

>>10307390
I guess I should retire too haha

>> No.10307557
File: 23 KB, 392x385, god im so tired.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10307557

>>10307255
>>10307253
Please, no... I'm not strong enough to continue seeing this for years to come. I'm just not

>> No.10307562

Why do the mods delete that webm of the fat dude on the beach, but keep all these loser threads?

>> No.10307656

Lol yeah that's going to work out great banning all the fatties from a fatty dominated event
That's just bad business

>> No.10307890
File: 53 KB, 452x393, rasist.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10307890

She had a gallery on her now defunct site. In that gallery, she removed this pic. But someone found it elesewhere and posted it publically.

Then people called her out for being racist on Sweden's biggest message board Flashback, and then she disappeared from the public.

So basically, she was just a flabby arsed racist bitch.

>> No.10307892

>>10307104
Anyone who sticks their hip out and uses the right camera angle can get an ass like that.

Source: have done it for shits and giggles. Suddenly super-ass.

>> No.10307912
File: 525 KB, 2048x2048, 4wxohdm93vt21.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10307912

>>10307892

You do not have as good an ass as STPeach

/cgl/ is delusional

>> No.10307949

>>10307250
The janitor deleted several comments asking for this thread to be deleted, instead of deleting the reported thread. They don't care that this is obviously a troll/vendetta. More people need to report it I guess.

>> No.10307953

>>10307949

Maybe it's a male janitor or something? Posts criticizing or logically responding to a lot of troll threads and posts have been deleted too

>> No.10308063

>>10307912
BLACKED

RAW

DOT

COM

>> No.10308072

>>10307949
Then death will be my only release from this hell

>> No.10308088
File: 41 KB, 634x672, 1575621364_61_Social-media-users-share-Instagram-versus-reality-snaps.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10308088

>>10307912
no u
There's a reason you don't see the unposed version, and it's because the illusion falls apart, which ain't so good for cash.

>> No.10308089
File: 79 KB, 612x612, downloadfile-1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10308089

>>10308088

>> No.10308091
File: 45 KB, 634x634, 4B3AAE4200000578-5623139-Leanne_Ward_pictured_posted_on_her_Instagram_about_the_truth_beh-a-1_1523922642705.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10308091

>>10308089

>> No.10308092
File: 126 KB, 1080x1080, 461ed0a7cb2e0128be2ce94521f8912e.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10308092

>>10308091

>> No.10308093
File: 110 KB, 700x848, the-real-life-booty.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10308093

>>10308092

>> No.10308094
File: 227 KB, 1456x1458, tmp_RHpm7G_5a68c337a026fed5_butt.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10308094

>>10308093

>> No.10308095

>>10308094
Speaking of which, notice how the girl in the OP is standing in a completely neutral, natural pose?

If she tilted her hips outwards under the correct lighting and angular conditions, I guarantee her ass would look round and bubbly.

>> No.10308100
File: 214 KB, 1080x1080, tmp_nYp2PD_7e66645847733b1b_21294360_363501774089027_7910525930332749824_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10308100

>>10308095
Might as well make this thread educational, so I'll continue to dump these.

>> No.10308101
File: 99 KB, 1080x1080, 58ce3ca9e19b5bcd0e968935030ea7cd.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10308101

>>10308100

>> No.10308103
File: 452 KB, 598x599, 4d8d2c06660d3c856a52b916c12ae1b1.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10308103

>>10308101

>> No.10308105
File: 83 KB, 750x750, nmlMUByAk_rNk3xeCfE4aJX4i8LLvcrC5m0Zf1lFm-M.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10308105

>>10308103

>> No.10308107
File: 374 KB, 429x480, Screen_Shot_2017-12-19_at_7.41.39_AM_large.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10308107

>>10308105
Most of these are purely posing and camera tricks, but Photoshop can of course play a role.

>> No.10308108
File: 101 KB, 700x700, 10-2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10308108

>>10308107
...sometimes to quite an extreme degree

>> No.10308109
File: 132 KB, 700x700, personal-trainer-shows-reality-vs-instagram-pictures-differences-chessie-king11-5ad849c74b190__700.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10308109

>>10308108
But back to posing!

>> No.10308110
File: 145 KB, 700x652, personal-trainer-shows-reality-vs-instagram-pictures-differences-chessie-king6-5ad849bdaafad__700.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10308110

>>10308109
To keep this /cgl/ related, these tricks can of course be applied to cosplay photoshoots.

(Again, same person, different pose)

>> No.10308112
File: 725 KB, 786x786, screen-shot-2018-04-03-at-12-01-52-pm.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10308112

>>10308110
Clothing can play a role as well. Underwear can be hiked up to great effect.

>> No.10308117
File: 104 KB, 634x633, 13859452-7062501-image-m-22_1558619792030.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10308117

>>10308112
All this to say, if you get taken in so easily by staged and carefully curated pictures, maybe the delusional one... is you, anon?

>> No.10308118
File: 63 KB, 640x640, mxs9e2ty6j541.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10308118

>>10308117
I gotta do christmas shopping, so I'll end on this note.

Never believe from a picture what you haven't seen in real life.

>> No.10308123

>>10307912
She very obviously has lordosis. Her actual ass is pretty small, it's just the unusually curved back that makes it look longer.

>> No.10308162
File: 31 KB, 503x644, CworAXaUQAA09TC.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10308162

>>10308118
Most depressing reality check since pic related.

>> No.10308172

>>10308107
It's sad she felt the need to photoshop herself. The shopped version looks pretty gross and noticeably warped.

>> No.10308182

>>10308123
Entirely possible that she developed it from constantly arching her back and sticking her butt out.

>> No.10308183

>>10308162
Women put a lot more effort into their appearance, so it's not too surprising. If more men spent hours grooming themselves and being careful with their photos, the graph would probably be more even.

>> No.10308186

>>10308183
I wouldn't bother replying to that anon because they have also been spamming the graph on lolcow as some sort of gotcha to women. I see nothing wrong with the graph, particuarly in terms on dating websites. Men take a lot of shitty unflattering pictures of themselves on dating sites which make them look ugly, even if they are not in real life.

>> No.10308187

>>10308186
Ehh, gotta hope people will learn to listen to logic instead of emotion or self-hatred.

>> No.10308197

>>10308183
I've never posted this graph anywhere before, I just saw it talked about on a podcast.
If your assumption was correct, then the male graph would look like a reverse of the female one. It's not, it's literally a near perfect bell curve which shows a very clear representation of an average among the tested individuals.
Also, yes I do notice how well women take pictures on dating websites. What else could I do but clap whenever I see them hide almost 100 lbs behind a fucking door frame?