Old school thread: angelic pritty edition

File: 249 KB, 655x1024, z_c95d1b5a.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Old school thread: angelic pritty edition Anonymous Thu Sep 19 11:32:15 2019 No.10259787 [Reply] [Original]

>>	Anonymous Thu Sep 19 11:35:46 2019 No.10259790 File: 359 KB, 440x702, 1566068793584.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Thu Sep 19 11:36:51 2019 No.10259791 File: 49 KB, 436x600, x_b30adeaf.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10259790

>>	Anonymous Thu Sep 19 11:38:43 2019 No.10259792 File: 70 KB, 436x600, x_5a61e8d3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10259791

>>	Anonymous Thu Sep 19 11:39:50 2019 No.10259793 File: 273 KB, 660x1024, z_00faf367.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10259792

>>	Anonymous Thu Sep 19 12:11:52 2019 No.10259808 this was the dump you were so desperate to make?

>>	Anonymous Thu Sep 19 13:10:32 2019 No.10259836 >>10259808 Im not that anon lol

>>	Anonymous Thu Sep 19 15:06:25 2019 No.10259879 File: 64 KB, 179x320, 1054.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] How about a little exchange/discussion! Share one of your old school dream items. Waiting to get my hands on this beautiful OP

Anonymous Thu Sep 19 15:28:05 2019 No.10259886
File: 98 KB, 700x700, DE12A62F-2360-4F1D-8726-D062420D8B2C.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>10259879
Forever hoping to find Thumbelina...
I’m more interested in the beige version desu but I couldn’t find a nice stock photo.
Does anyone know how often this pops up for sale?

Anonymous Thu Sep 19 15:32:24 2019 No.10259889

OK, perhaps not the most relevant post but the discussion about the 6 year old bag (wasn't part of the discussion fyi) and hoarding made me realize that maybe I should finally let go of a lot of pieces I own (not all but the majority of them are old school). Been holding off, making excuses like maybe I'll regret selling them or oh I'm too busy. Even had some prospective buyers when I asked for price checks, but never got around to selling the pieces and kinda fell bad about letting them down. Maybe if I get rid of the things I never wear anymore I'll be able to rekindle my love for lolita and perhaps invest in other pieces more of my liking, cause lately I only care for casual non-lolita clothes like F i.n.t. I want to thank you guys for helping me reach this decision and I'm really hoping some of my favorite (old school) lolita's end up buying those pieces cause I know they will do them justice.

TLDR; ya'll turned me into an ex-hoarder. Thank you.

>>	Anonymous Thu Sep 19 15:35:01 2019 No.10259890 >>10259889 as long as you feel good about it, this sounds wonderful anon let us know when you start listing! I'l keep an eye on the BST thread

>>	Anonymous Thu Sep 19 15:52:44 2019 No.10259907 >>10259889 That's amazing to hear!

>>	Anonymous Thu Sep 19 15:56:02 2019 No.10259913 File: 26 KB, 240x340, 5bc60e21-8528-5f27-a5f9-c4ea41c9bd84.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10259879 gloomy bear x btssb apron and bonnet!

>>	Anonymous Thu Sep 19 17:11:30 2019 No.10259987 >>10259889 So proud of you!

>>	Anonymous Thu Sep 19 17:36:55 2019 No.10259996 >>10259787 Link the old thread newfag >>10247839

>>	Anonymous Thu Sep 19 17:41:32 2019 No.10259999 >>10259889 Show us the goods mate

Anonymous Thu Sep 19 19:29:25 2019 No.10260041

>>10259890
>>10259907
>>10259987
Thank you all, I feel really encouraged!

>>10259999
Sorry for tldr.
Doing a way bigger cull than I expected, some items I'm still not sure about and need to make the decision the coming week. If you don't mind, will update you all later on the full list (incl. non-old school) once I know which ones are going for sure. Pretty much my entire collection (which is pretty big) of old school Meta velveteens gets the boot and my olive D. Wakure set as well. This I am 100% sure about selling. Not sure but maybe: a Baby set (2005/2007) and AatP, IW stuff from 2009 to 2012.

Feels like I'm Marie Kondo-ing my collection, there won't be much left if I do this. Which actually feels kinda good, never thought I'd say that!

>>	Anonymous Fri Sep 20 00:22:07 2019 No.10260196 File: 29 KB, 570x600, haIfhujKjtpJwnRDz45MEzEQsbIjuEaZ-33[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Thoughts on these shoes?

Anonymous Fri Sep 20 01:38:24 2019 No.10260221

>old school dream items
I want this Shirring OP worn here >>10259787 in every single fucking cut and fabric choice imagined. I was in love as soon as I saw it, but then I was able to find one of them thanks to an amazing anon here, and now that I have it in person I am fucking obsessed. It’s been released in both cotton and velvet solid colors, in addition to florals.. I fucking need all of them.

>>	Anonymous Fri Sep 20 02:11:27 2019 No.10260233 >>10260196 absolutely not

>>	Anonymous Fri Sep 20 02:34:01 2019 No.10260249 >>10260041 That sounds exciting, good luck with your life improvement! It's a good time to sell velvet items since a lot of us are thinking about cooler weather coords.

>>	Anonymous Fri Sep 20 04:11:25 2019 No.10260274 >>10260041 Ohhh, I’m very interested in all things velveteen! What’s your LM name if you don’t mind me asking

>>	Anonymous Fri Sep 20 04:45:44 2019 No.10260278 >>10260041 I am so proud of you making this life improvement, wish you the best of luck and looking forward to seeing your sales!

>>	Anonymous Fri Sep 20 06:37:56 2019 No.10260293 >>10260196 For old school? Nah. If you found this on DK they often have better mary janes than these, with a chunky heel and all.

>>	Anonymous Fri Sep 20 09:54:25 2019 No.10260351 >>10260233 >>10260293 Nayrt but when i look at old snaps i feel like they wore any mary janes they were able to find

>>	Anonymous Fri Sep 20 14:08:10 2019 No.10260459 >>10260221 >amazing anon here aww you're too sweet! I'm glad I could link you that bxw OP. Hope you find the beautiful blue one!!

>>	Anonymous Fri Sep 20 14:10:39 2019 No.10260460 >>10260351 I mean you can follow that logic, but your coords will look nothing like old school because whats easily accessible now has changed significantly over the years

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 21 11:48:00 2019 No.10260884 >>10260196 I cant get why it isn't right? It looks pretty chunky

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 21 12:22:58 2019 No.10260895 >>10260884 There's more to it than just chunky/not chunky. The shape is all wrong and they're very clearly contemporary shoes

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 21 13:35:32 2019 No.10260931 >>10260895 Where can i learn more?

Anonymous Sat Sep 21 14:13:26 2019 No.10260943

>>10260931
Just look at more snaps.

My main issues with the shoes:
The toebox is more pointy than rounded. Oldschool shoes have a blockier toe, sometimes almost square.
The soles have large ridges. Oldschool soles have almost no ridges.
The platform is continuous. Most oldschool shoes have the heel and toe platforms almost completely separate.
The strap is disproportionate. This buckle and strap make the shoes look cartoonish because they're just too big.

Basically, every individual component of the shoes is just a little bit off, so the whole thing is unusable.

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 21 14:17:56 2019 No.10260944 >>10260943 They look fine, you're being a twat again Ophelia.

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 21 14:23:43 2019 No.10260948 >>10260944 I'm not Ophelia, first off, I'm a different autist. Besides all that shit I listed off, I find old school shoes much more comfy than my new shit. If anon didn't want harsh advice, then /cgl/ is not the place for them.

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 21 14:59:06 2019 No.10260967 >>10260943 Thanks for the explanation Anon.

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 21 15:02:45 2019 No.10260968 >>10260944 Nah they're right. Good detail analysis, really.

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 21 15:35:48 2019 No.10260975 >>10260948 Just ignore and report please, it's the shitposter again.

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 21 16:13:47 2019 No.10261001 File: 32 KB, 375x500, 6fa00b7f52235df88d93d0552c5e5b69.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10259879 One day...

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 21 16:15:24 2019 No.10261003 >>10260196 I hate it when people use heels with visible treading like these in coords. Absolutely not loliable, as much as the rest of the shoe may look it

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 22 14:45:29 2019 No.10261522 What do you think about tattoos and piercings in OLD SCHOOL?

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 22 17:22:38 2019 No.10261605 >>10261522 imo whether you have tattoos or piercings is a personal decision and I don't really judge lolitas who have them. I feel the same about it whether its old or new school lolita

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 22 19:57:45 2019 No.10261725 >>10261522 >how do you feel about tattoos and piercings in a punk/goth subculture that's main subject is rebelling against the norm for female beauty standards

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 23 05:39:04 2019 No.10261939 >>10261725 That's why i love old schoolers! Anon, let me kiss you from all my heart!

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 23 08:09:54 2019 No.10261984 >>10261725 Lol spending time on hair and makeup and wearing skirts and dresses is not rebelling against female beauty standards

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 23 08:22:03 2019 No.10261990 >>10261984 you're either a man or an idiot

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 23 08:30:47 2019 No.10261993 >>10261984 >Not knowing the origins of lolita fashion Summer really is long this year

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 23 09:04:14 2019 No.10262003 >>10261984 It is rebelling by exaggerating social standards to the absurd point

Anonymous Mon Sep 23 09:50:15 2019 No.10262011

>>10261993
All the girls posted itt are wearing makeup and have neatly styled hair

>>10261990
I'm not a man and you're not rebelling against beauty standards

>>10262003
Lmao no it's not, that's like saying dressing up like Maire Anoinette in a bigass wig and dress every day is rebelling against beauty standards

Anonymous Mon Sep 23 09:54:13 2019 No.10262012

>>10262011
Not any of the anons you replied to, but you’ve got to be either intentionally being dense or literally mentally retarded if you don’t see how exaggerating the female/feminine stereotypes seen as “bad” and owning them to say “fuck you” to the sexualization of femininity is rebelling.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 23 09:57:00 2019 No.10262013 >>10262011 do you not understand what standards means?

Anonymous Mon Sep 23 10:02:53 2019 No.10262016

>>10262011
>All the girls posted itt are wearing makeup and have neatly styled hair
I never said or even implied they didn't, sorry you're too dense to realize that.
Girls wore lolita to express femininity for themselves rather than to catch a husband like was expected in Japan at the time.

Anonymous Mon Sep 23 10:03:37 2019 No.10262017

>>10262012
You're still making yourself look nice using hair and makeup, it's hardly rebelling. Do you think wearing bright lipstick and winged eyeliner is owning the patriarchy? This isn't either

>>10262013
Going against social standards =/= going against beauty standards

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 23 10:04:56 2019 No.10262018 >>10262016 That's nice, you're not a Japanese girl in the early 90s

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 23 10:05:41 2019 No.10262019 >>10262016 >Girls wore lolita to express femininity for themselves rather than to catch a husband like was expected in Japan at the time. this

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 23 10:06:57 2019 No.10262020 Can we just ignore the obvious roleplayer

Anonymous Mon Sep 23 10:07:49 2019 No.10262021

>>10262017
Beauty standards are social standards dumbass. If they weren’t, they wouldn’t change from culture to culture. Not every lolita(not even most) is rocking the kind of makeup you describe either. Nice to see you aren’t even going to attempt to address the point of lolita taking negative female stereotypes such as frivolity and owning them. Probably because you’re too stupid to wrap your head around the concept.

There’s no way you aren’t some male larping.

Anonymous Mon Sep 23 10:11:21 2019 No.10262023

>>10262019
this seems kind of interesting, like, the motivation to actually wear lolita seems very complex, I wish I could fully understand it in depth, as a male, they sort of give to me an aura of purity and feminity, which is attractive, but then they give another aura of being fashion victims and in too deep into urban subcultures that is kind of off-putting, so... back in the days, what used to happen with lolitas as in the sexual/sentimental/marriage field?

Anonymous Mon Sep 23 10:11:34 2019 No.10262024

>>10262021
Do you think goth girls with fully-done faces and nice clothing are rebelling against beauty standards too? Sure they're rebelling against social norms but if they're following traditionally enforced grooming standards for women they're not rebelling

>>10262021
Can you read? It was another example of something that's frequently cited as "rebelling against the patriarchy" when it isn't. None of the lolitas posted ITT are wearing that makeup and they're not rebelling either

Anonymous Mon Sep 23 10:13:55 2019 No.10262025

>>10262024
Why are you autism levels of fixated on makeup automatically being for other people? There are girls in Jfash that literally wear clown makeup every day. Are you saying that is to conform to ~beauty~ standards? Go back to /r9k/ where everyone will agree with your autistic screeching over muh makeup.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 23 10:14:59 2019 No.10262026 >>10262023 disgusting

Anonymous Mon Sep 23 10:17:10 2019 No.10262029

>>10262025
Yeah and those clown faced girls are rebelling much more than you are! Meanwhile the vast majority of lolitas and ALL of the examples in here aren't. They wear makeup and style their hair in ways to cover up their natural flaws, and are WOMEN wearing hyper feminine clothing. That's not rebelling against female beauty standards. Face it

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 23 10:17:56 2019 No.10262031 >>10262029 >>>/r9k/ Pls go back home, your incel pack misses you.

Anonymous Mon Sep 23 10:21:48 2019 No.10262033

>>10262029
my god you are brain dead. culturally established women's beauty standards are in place to attract men. the mainstream understanding of femininity is to attract men. lolitas express hyper femininity NOT to attract men but for themselves, to embrace femininity SEPARATE from sex.

Anonymous Mon Sep 23 10:22:14 2019 No.10262035

>>10262031
It's funny how you all think I'm an incel solely because I said lolita doesn't go against female beauty standards even though I said nothing negative about women in general, only beauty standards. Meanwhile you ignore >>10262023 Kinda pathetic

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 23 10:23:33 2019 No.10262036 >>10262033 You can embrace beauty standards without wanting to attract men dumbass. Re: lesbians that embrace beauty standards, wearing makeup and nice clothing to the workplace, etc.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 23 10:24:07 2019 No.10262037 >>10262036 reading comprehension levels are low

Anonymous Mon Sep 23 10:24:57 2019 No.10262040

>>10262035
I don’t think you’re an incel “solely because (you) said lolita doesn't go against female beauty standards”, I think you’re an incel because you are autistically fixated on girls wearing makeup and it seems to legitimately trigger you to the point of denial that girls wear makeup for themselves and not just for men

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 23 10:28:06 2019 No.10262041 >>10262040 Did you read what I just said? You can embrace beauty standards without wanting to attract men >>10262036 >>10262037 Nice and you're not rebelling against the patriarchy!

Anonymous Mon Sep 23 10:30:37 2019 No.10262042

>>10262041
Beauty standards are in place for women to attract a mate. If a girl dresses in a fashion specifically rooted in NOT attracting one but for expressing themselves, they are not conforming to beauty standards. If you’re serious and you REALLY cant get this through your head, someone needs to euthanize you or put you in a facility with the rest of the retards deemed too stupid to function with the rest of society

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 23 10:32:48 2019 No.10262043 >>10262042 Wow imagine wanting to euthanize somebody for thinking lolita doesn't rebel against beauty standards. No wonder you've deluded yourself into thinking you're rebelling against the patriarchy, you're mentally ill af

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 23 10:34:11 2019 No.10262044 OK please let's ignore the dense shitposter now

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 23 10:39:33 2019 No.10262046 >>10262043 I stand by my point that we should euthanize the mentally retarded, such as yourself.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 23 10:42:45 2019 No.10262048 >>10262044 >>10262020 Ignoring doesn't help, you have to report them. Also if jannies just nuked all their posts, I wouldn't be surprised if we discover there is some samefagging going on.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 23 10:44:15 2019 No.10262051 >>10262048 Are you genuinely retarded? I never said I wasn't samefagging, I made all of these posts >>10262046 So you and >>10262048 should be euthanized as well?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 23 10:45:22 2019 No.10262053 >>10262051 Nah just you. You seem to be the only honest to god sped here.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 23 10:48:58 2019 No.10262054 >>10262053 Whatever makes you feel better. If you start taking your meds you won't want to euthanize people anymore and your delusions will go away!

Anonymous Mon Sep 23 10:53:36 2019 No.10262058

>>10261984
It's rebelling against the current standards, yes.
The current standard of beauty is to show more skin and wear tight low cut clothing. Lolita emphasizes modesty, timelessness, and a kind of asexual prettiness. It takes norms from a time when women were socially repressed and plays with them.
If you find it attractive, that's fine, I mean men are going to find women attractive even if they wear a dinosaur costume, but it's on you.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 23 11:23:56 2019 No.10262077 File: 256 KB, 800x1180, 34594000066_7c33bd21cc_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] ignore maleposters

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 23 14:12:23 2019 No.10262149 >>10260895 The treading is something that always makes it look obviously new to me. Maybe there are coords that have that sole back then, but it's not what I think of.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 23 14:16:24 2019 No.10262151 >>10262054 >Being triggered by some random telling you that you should be euthanized "Drink bleach" is the oldest 4ch saying in the book. Maybe you should.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 23 14:34:46 2019 No.10262161 >>10262151 >Being this triggered that someone thinks lolita adheres to traditional female beauty standards Lol nice

Anonymous Mon Sep 23 14:57:48 2019 No.10262174

>>10262161
Didn't even read the thread, different poster. Just think you're a right dumb cunt for being so offended that you're wrong that you have to poke at silly, inoffensive (by 4chan standards) things like someone saying get euthanized. Is this your first day here?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 23 15:06:53 2019 No.10262178 >>10262174 >I'm a different poster!!! >you're offended! Whatever you say anon. Lolita still adheres to beauty standards and you need to take your meds.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 23 15:52:01 2019 No.10262200 Ignore maleposters. Report maleposters. This thread is for raging lipstick lesbians ONLY.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 23 17:33:44 2019 No.10262225 File: 57 KB, 720x1079, FB_IMG_1569221905407.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] SHUT THE FUCK UP AND POST OLDSCHOOL

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 23 22:50:09 2019 No.10262351 File: 16 KB, 213x284, 0PdyKsl (2018_11_06 22_27_01 UTC).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10262225

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 24 00:15:51 2019 No.10262383 File: 434 KB, 542x756, fruits1.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 24 00:16:54 2019 No.10262384 File: 154 KB, 545x768, fruits2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 24 12:30:37 2019 No.10262588 File: 32 KB, 400x300, 7b163f3f-c996-5a3c-9026-60f7fb1d60fc.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] requesting snaps or coords with capelets & mini-mantles--particularly velveteen?

Anonymous Tue Sep 24 22:41:04 2019 No.10262863

Do you know guys, that unlike beautiful modern lolitas, you look like colourblind freaks, cause you, I dunno why, don't give a fuck 'bout color balance? I bet normies think you're mentally ill. How can anyone like something like this?

I'm happy we have chiffon now and thin lace, so coords look gorgeous.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 24 23:08:35 2019 No.10262873 >>10262863 Cool story bro

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 24 23:14:45 2019 No.10262876 >>10262863 lolling heartily at the insinuation that normies don’t think lolitas who wear chiffon are also mentally ill were all freaks non, get used to it

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 24 23:19:42 2019 No.10262880 File: 36 KB, 300x169, 5.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10262863 So which oldschool OP DD did you miss out on on mercari, anon? Be honest.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 24 23:22:47 2019 No.10262881 File: 60 KB, 300x400, 1510362807378.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10262863

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 24 23:23:51 2019 No.10262883 File: 153 KB, 423x800, rjjmEbI.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10262881

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 24 23:38:05 2019 No.10262890 >>10262880 nayrt but what even are you implying? i doubt they give a fuck about old school other than shitting on it

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 24 23:55:22 2019 No.10262901 >>10262863 all versions of lolit -, old, new, sweet, gothic, etc - we all look fucking stupid to normies. don't shit on old school style, we should walk hand in hand with our frilly sisters

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 24 23:58:32 2019 No.10262904 >>10262890 Fox and sour grapes. I don't really think that's the case, I'm just shitposting.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 24 23:59:03 2019 No.10262905 >>10262883 Is this a replica of this OP? >>10261001

>>	Anonymous Wed Sep 25 00:08:45 2019 No.10262910 File: 7 KB, 260x126, whatamI..jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10262905 no. many designs back in the day had releases in different fabrics.

>>	Anonymous Wed Sep 25 00:10:50 2019 No.10262912 >>10262905 Didn't that OP also release in red? considering the link on the picture takes me to an old school lolita blog, would wager it's legit

Anonymous Wed Sep 25 00:29:09 2019 No.10262927
File: 185 KB, 360x500, img20081006_1_p.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>10262880
It's fucking funny (and pitiable) to imagine that
>"I'll try old school lolita. I'm not into most of this stuff, but this dress is lovely! It seems rare, too"
>someone buys it before anon can
>"...You know what? Fuck those old school freaks, anyway. Can't believe I was almost caught slipping. I-It's actually a blessing that I didn't get to buy that dress! I'll go and tell them how horrible they look right now, in fact..."
>tears welling up in anon's eyes
>"I LOVE my modern lolita dresses! They're beautiful and gorgeous! Those of you in velvet OPs and thick lace look like SHIT"
I'd draw a comic of that, but I can't draw lmao

>>	Anonymous Wed Sep 25 00:46:08 2019 No.10262937 >>10262927 Holy shit this is hilarious! Someone needs to draw this!

>>	Anonymous Wed Sep 25 03:09:49 2019 No.10262985 >>10262912 I always thought that dress is velvet...

>>	Anonymous Wed Sep 25 03:36:40 2019 No.10262997 >>10262927 Reminds me of Francis's mood swings

>>	Anonymous Wed Sep 25 05:12:35 2019 No.10263039 >>10262985 the black one is, but as this isn't the first time I've seen this dress in red + the person wearing it has a huge old school blog + collection, I would assume it's real

Anonymous Wed Sep 25 05:25:01 2019 No.10263041
File: 28 KB, 445x401, bb8684aa60bc2fefdadbc45114ace69b.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>10262985
It comes in both cotton and velveteen. And yes it's real. I've seen the red one for sale on a Japanese auction site, a very long time ago. I'm guessing she's the one who bought it.

>>	Anonymous Wed Sep 25 06:40:49 2019 No.10263066 >>10263039 >>10263041 Ty guys!

Anonymous Wed Sep 25 09:29:39 2019 No.10263103

old-school is a way to be a little bit ita in a (lolita)-socially acceptable way, and also invoke the nostalgia of being a teenager and just getting into the fashion.
That's not a dig, I like old-school too. If you think it's a dig, fight me, I'm an oldfag.

>>	Anonymous Wed Sep 25 09:43:06 2019 No.10263111 File: 412 KB, 1200x1600, 1500273787232.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Wed Sep 25 09:44:12 2019 No.10263113 File: 310 KB, 400x773, 1566069341165.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10263111

>>	Anonymous Wed Sep 25 09:45:13 2019 No.10263115 File: 110 KB, 731x1049, awn.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10263113

>>	Anonymous Wed Sep 25 09:46:18 2019 No.10263116 File: 489 KB, 1164x1600, bvt.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10263115 One of my favorites

>>	Anonymous Wed Sep 25 09:56:44 2019 No.10263120 File: 157 KB, 582x816, image0 copy 3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10263116

>>	Anonymous Wed Sep 25 09:57:46 2019 No.10263122 File: 60 KB, 258x750, tumblr_nb31zuV8sq1qij2iyo1_500.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10263120

>>	Anonymous Wed Sep 25 09:58:49 2019 No.10263123 File: 130 KB, 500x685, tumblr_mgxlwxOZZx1s2w9qio1_500.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10263122

Anonymous Wed Sep 25 16:22:36 2019 No.10263285
File: 551 KB, 750x828, 1598966F-DEFF-42B3-917E-77D7ACE008AF.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Rose Lace Petticoat from 2001 popped up if anyone is interested. It’s a bit much, but damn I love those old lace details.

https://rover.ebay.com/rover/0/0/0?mpre=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ebay.com%2Fulk%2Fitm%2F233350703528

>>	Anonymous Wed Sep 25 17:11:57 2019 No.10263300 >>10263285 That's a drop shipper/reseller dumbass, they have hundreds of listings with ridiculously marked up prices and fril proof photos

>>	Anonymous Wed Sep 25 17:21:23 2019 No.10263305 >>10263300 No shit, so are most Lolita “sellers” on eBay. doesn’t mean that someone isn’t interested. People bout CTP for $3k at one point. 200 for a skirt isn’t super unreasonable.

>>	Anonymous Wed Sep 25 18:02:23 2019 No.10263320 >>10263285 >>10263305 Fuck off scalper. https://item.fril.jp/e5a359803780cf6d92e25b67e9ab90cb

>>	Anonymous Wed Sep 25 18:06:32 2019 No.10263324 >>10263285 >Location: United States So which one of the failed LM scalpers is this?

Anonymous Wed Sep 25 18:09:02 2019 No.10263326

>>10263305
They don't physically own anything they posted you dunce, would you rather buy a dress for $100 off of fril with an SS or that same dress for $400 from that seller who is literally buying shit from fril after you buy the ebay listing then reshipping it to you, how dense are you

>>	Anonymous Wed Sep 25 18:32:34 2019 No.10263342 >>10262200 this but unironically

>>	Anonymous Wed Sep 25 20:06:32 2019 No.10263376 >>10263285 I owned this and sold it for $15 because no one wanted it for months. It isn’t worth $200.

>>	Anonymous Wed Sep 25 20:21:09 2019 No.10263380 >>10263376 Similar ones have sold for more on LM though. Bitches love fully shirred skirts.

>>	Anonymous Wed Sep 25 21:32:45 2019 No.10263397 >>10262863 >not wanting to look like a colourblind freak I hesitate to use the word "poseur" in 2019, but damn. >>10263103 This anon gets it.

>>	Anonymous Thu Sep 26 06:56:19 2019 No.10263539 >>10263116 Beautiful. Is the OP jane marple?

>>	Anonymous Thu Sep 26 07:33:02 2019 No.10263548 >>10263539 No it’s from brand called ”vie privée”

>>	Anonymous Thu Sep 26 20:07:22 2019 No.10263930 File: 792 KB, 1080x2220, Screenshot_20190926-190623_Ghostery.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10262883 Oof

>>	Anonymous Thu Sep 26 20:10:47 2019 No.10263934 >>10263930 what are you pointing out?

>>	Anonymous Thu Sep 26 20:16:08 2019 No.10263938 >>10263934 How tight the straps are around her calves

>>	Anonymous Fri Sep 27 00:06:13 2019 No.10264061 >>10263938 They don't stay up without the squeeze. If you still have circulation you're doing it wrong.

Anonymous Fri Sep 27 00:28:08 2019 No.10264068

>>10263930
>>10264061

Actually, I do want to know how they stay up. Have a pair of Bodyline RHS and there's nothing at the ends of the straps, I've never figured out how to tie them. I've heard that some girls put double--sided tape to hold them up and others use safety pins apparently?

How do they stay up?

>>	Anonymous Fri Sep 27 00:56:35 2019 No.10264078 >>10264068 They just explained, the chub helps hold it up like a strangling shelf. Also probably sock glue

>>	Anonymous Fri Sep 27 01:16:12 2019 No.10264087 >>10264068 Wait nothing at all? Bodyline ones are meant to have velcro at the ends, then you just sock tape them in the middle.

>>	Anonymous Fri Sep 27 04:49:49 2019 No.10264143 >>10264087 Nothing. Maybe the velcro (like, all 4 pieces??) fell off during transit, idk. Or I got a dud pair that slipped past quality control somehow. Your comment explains a lot though, thanks! Should be easy enough to glue some velcro on.

>>	Anonymous Fri Sep 27 13:47:10 2019 No.10264351 File: 3.75 MB, 1190x1490, Screen Shot 2019-09-27 at 7.44.26 PM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Fri Sep 27 13:48:17 2019 No.10264352 File: 113 KB, 753x1024, 39.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10264351

>>	Anonymous Fri Sep 27 13:49:20 2019 No.10264353 File: 99 KB, 446x540, 0135 - hQNYvWt.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10264352

>>	Anonymous Fri Sep 27 13:50:21 2019 No.10264354 File: 96 KB, 720x960, 1919670_495173463952013_7036692638301727948_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10264353

>>	Anonymous Fri Sep 27 13:51:26 2019 No.10264355 File: 1023 KB, 870x1460, Screen Shot 2019-09-27 at 7.46.08 PM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10264354

>>	Anonymous Fri Sep 27 13:52:29 2019 No.10264356 File: 51 KB, 346x600, 0187 - CclzR7s.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10264355

>>	Anonymous Fri Sep 27 13:53:32 2019 No.10264357 File: 120 KB, 689x963, 69096006_1556008154533630_2718510996091043840_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10264356

>>	Anonymous Fri Sep 27 13:54:42 2019 No.10264358 File: 3.39 MB, 1058x1488, Screen Shot 2019-09-27 at 7.46.35 PM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10264357

>>	Anonymous Fri Sep 27 13:55:44 2019 No.10264359 File: 121 KB, 500x355, 1560560006692.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10264358

>>	Anonymous Fri Sep 27 13:56:47 2019 No.10264360 File: 114 KB, 403x594, 69431091_125341095476713_7632378105872515072_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10264359

>>	Anonymous Fri Sep 27 13:58:24 2019 No.10264361 File: 128 KB, 728x1023, 69812613_1561918463942599_5371960758135422976_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10264360

>>	Anonymous Fri Sep 27 13:59:26 2019 No.10264362 File: 180 KB, 479x668, tumblr_mpj4ogYRUE1rpojm0o1_500.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10264361

>>	Anonymous Fri Sep 27 14:00:28 2019 No.10264364 File: 48 KB, 559x419, 0279 - DchEcfl.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10264362

>>	Anonymous Fri Sep 27 14:04:37 2019 No.10264368 File: 261 KB, 1200x875, 1568476311843.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10264364

>>	Anonymous Fri Sep 27 14:05:39 2019 No.10264369 File: 47 KB, 297x500, 1566667046137.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10264368

>>	Anonymous Fri Sep 27 15:17:52 2019 No.10264424 >>10264356 this is my aesthetic right here. hits me right in the heart.

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 28 09:38:10 2019 No.10264794 >>10264364 This one makes me uncomfortable. Reminds me too much of some sissy shit.

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 28 09:44:37 2019 No.10264796 >>10264794 that sounds like a you problem

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 28 10:14:21 2019 No.10264800 >>10264796 Yes, anon. That's why the post was typed with first person pronouns, not second or third person.

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 29 08:46:57 2019 No.10265126 File: 361 KB, 1536x2048, 58003940_10161412551895276_4587724864034439168_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 29 08:48:02 2019 No.10265127 File: 261 KB, 1440x1440, 59841609_291099421820641_7515158582824796160_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10265126

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 29 08:49:07 2019 No.10265128 File: 183 KB, 1304x1738, 67430013_2343858625706141_5109513289704931328_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10265127

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 29 08:50:09 2019 No.10265129 File: 225 KB, 686x959, 70827720_10220735573202244_1682421896244625408_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10265128

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 29 08:51:12 2019 No.10265131 File: 70 KB, 700x960, 60919113_10214197579669727_9144323176656797696_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10265129

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 29 08:52:15 2019 No.10265132 File: 485 KB, 1536x2048, 62154955_2408222319409083_7783356230780583936_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10265131

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 29 09:24:54 2019 No.10265137 >>10265132 What dress is this?

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 29 10:58:05 2019 No.10265168 >>10265137 https://lolibrary.org/items/ap-op-with-choker

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 29 10:58:19 2019 No.10265169 >>10260943 >Most oldschool shoes have the heel and toe platforms almost completely separate. Yes, either that or full platform NO in-betweensies and I agree that strap is all wrong. Good detective work, anon.

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 29 11:11:02 2019 No.10265175 File: 67 KB, 450x600, 1300162907925.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10262077 >ignore maleposters lmfao yes

Anonymous Sun Sep 29 11:12:26 2019 No.10265176
File: 31 KB, 350x534, 9c51021cf5cb0545c9850568ffbfffea.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>10264359

Anyone remember the ole 2006 AP halloween sets, I think there was a Little Witch Set and a Pure Heart (?) set. Are there any coord of these esp the all white one?

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 29 11:13:32 2019 No.10265177 >>10264352 what bear is this? i'm on a bear obsession rn i kid you not.

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 29 11:18:01 2019 No.10265179 >>10265177 Looks like this was a segment on DIY-ing teddy bears.

Anonymous Sun Sep 29 11:18:44 2019 No.10265180

>>10260943
nayrt to add on, don't just look at snaps for inspo either anon! look at old goth photos, look for older stock designs of platform shoes from the 90s and search for shoes similar to that. antaina makes some decent platforms that work great with old school

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 29 11:19:13 2019 No.10265181 File: 154 KB, 742x1024, 049.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10265177 it was a gosurori pattern

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 29 11:36:31 2019 No.10265185 >>10265181 omg ty anon.. maybe now i can make my own bears instead of pining away for the burando ones

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 29 13:06:24 2019 No.10265208 >>10265176 I want this dress so bad and I’ve only ever seen it for sale once. I regret not getting it while I had the chance.

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 29 14:27:11 2019 No.10265236 >>10264143 Their quality control is awful. I had a pair years ago and on one shoe, the straps were much longer than on the other shoe.

Anonymous Sun Sep 29 15:41:58 2019 No.10265273

>>10265176
>>10265208

These sets are ultra rare and I'm surprised you even came across the AP cat one. I've seen the little witch set but never the AP Pure Heart Set. Here's a link on LJ back in the good ole' days: https://angelicpoodle.livejournal.com/121475.html

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 30 05:07:24 2019 No.10265542 I hate that kamiuchida0730 reseller so, so damn much. >>10265208 >>10265273 It's not ultra rare, it popped up last year and this year, a month ago.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 30 05:08:27 2019 No.10265543 I hate that kamiuchida0730 reseller so, so damn much. >>10265208 >>10265273 It's not ultra rare, it popped up last year and this year.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 30 05:11:47 2019 No.10265547 >>10265543 What did they do?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 30 05:15:15 2019 No.10265549 >>10265273 Literally every single one of the main pieces in the link sold this year except the Hansel & Gretel Set that someone tried to sell last year but then deleted it. You guys seriously need to up your secondhand game.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 30 05:20:34 2019 No.10265551 >>10265547 Buying very cheap (as in 1000-4000 yen) old school from violet blue or fril and then sell it for 10k-20k more. I hoped they finally fucked off or fully switched to scalping JM but I guess not.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 30 19:57:42 2019 No.10265837 >>10260196 Wow this brings me back. This is certainly an old-school look c. early 2000s. Completely ita, regardless.

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 1 14:02:27 2019 No.10266137 File: 55 KB, 402x536, 1566666974375.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 1 14:03:30 2019 No.10266138 File: 50 KB, 340x440, 1566670769967.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10266137

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 1 14:04:32 2019 No.10266139 File: 69 KB, 403x594, 69217558_125336652143824_7741977648267526144_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10266138

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 1 14:05:34 2019 No.10266140 File: 73 KB, 500x359, tumblr_lz7pp8pXCI1qij2iyo1_500.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10266139

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 1 20:27:33 2019 No.10266309 >>10266140 Low right girl, what is this jsk?

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 1 22:22:12 2019 No.10266345 >>10266309 It's that baby dress with embroidered flower pots with wheels and hats.

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 1 23:46:35 2019 No.10266373 >>10266309 >>10266345 Flower cart embroidery. Note that the release has two different jsk cuts. (lol @ that description though)

>>	Anonymous Wed Oct 2 01:08:34 2019 No.10266395 File: 69 KB, 720x721, meta bustier.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] I pretty much never see anyone talk about these existing (Meta gobelin bustier). Would something like this go in an ero lolita coord?

Anonymous Wed Oct 2 01:16:31 2019 No.10266401

>>10266395
Bustiers like this are usually worn over blouses with skirts to get a JSK look, not by themselves. I own a couple Meta bustiers like this and I think they'd look very strange without a blouse, especially if you don't have the matching skirt. Besides, this type of oldschool is way too frumpy looking to lend itself well to ero.

>>	Anonymous Wed Oct 2 01:50:07 2019 No.10266415 File: 126 KB, 960x1280, HI3C0241.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Wed Oct 2 18:44:49 2019 No.10266769 Ww has this gorgeous op listed. Im broken now, so mb one of you wil get it https://www.wunderwelt.jp/en/products/w-47150

>>	Anonymous Wed Oct 2 21:05:14 2019 No.10266819 >>10266769 Shoulder width: 34 cm >cries

>>	Anonymous Thu Oct 3 00:29:57 2019 No.10266882 File: 17 KB, 236x329, 87abd02dc4ec0b77781d94dfb0b0e3b9--lolita-style-gothic-lolita.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10264359 god i want to build an all red coordinate so bad

>>	Anonymous Thu Oct 3 01:54:04 2019 No.10266903 >>10266882 Just do it anon.

>>	Anonymous Fri Oct 4 13:23:43 2019 No.10267574 What do you dislike most about neo-lolita? I personally hate chiffon dresses and ott dresses that impossible to wear anywhere, without looking like Disney Princess cosplay. I also dislike tea parties and overall "versatile" look.

>>	Anonymous Fri Oct 4 13:33:58 2019 No.10267576 File: 69 KB, 472x645, 1555271718372.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10266882

>>	Anonymous Fri Oct 4 14:01:29 2019 No.10267583 >>10267574 I also dislike chiffon. I'm also sick to death of fucking berets, that pair of Baby lace socks literally everyone has, and heavy ig makeup worn with lolita. Tea parties have been around forever at this point though, I do admit I like them.

>>	Anonymous Fri Oct 4 14:33:51 2019 No.10267594 >>10267583 I generally feel the same about berets in modern coords but I love mini berets or berets that have ties for under the chin in old coords

Anonymous Fri Oct 4 14:45:27 2019 No.10267599

>>10267574
Oh, for me that is so hard to explain. It's the entire styling I guess. It's more fast fashion now, people wear a popular print a couple of times and then sell it. Old school fags like myself tend to hoard what we own, right?Or is that just me? Everything is about prints, prints, prints. The busier, bigger and gaudier the better is seems? The quality is not that great any more either, thinner cheaper fabrics, lots of crappy chiffon and the cuts often very simple cause all the focus is on the print. Sure, I own prints like every one else does (old school ones) but some people seem to skip on the simpler or solid pieces these days, so sad. I miss the time when people appreciated solids, pretty lace (like torchon) or embroidery, lovely details like pintucks or pleats. They put a lot of effort in the cuts. Old school has a certain frumpyness that I really love. I'm an nostalgic old fag though, neo-lolita has never been my thing. I love that girls born at the time I was already wearing it (2003) are now loving old school. Makes me happy to see young people appreciate the fashions origins.

I guess this answer was more about what I like about old school than what I hate about neo-lolita, oh well.

Anonymous Fri Oct 4 17:01:35 2019 No.10267631

>>10267574
I actually really like neo-lolita! I like how varied many brands releases have become while being more durable and accessible, especially with catering to the Chinese market. What I dislike has nothing to do with current lolita fashion, but more to do with current (western) lolitas.

I'm an old-school punk and goth lolita. I got into the fashion through VK in the early 00s, though I was aware of it even during the 90s. The lolita look back then (big clownish shoes, messy hair, bloomers peeking out, frumpy and doll-like) is very different from current trends. We weren't afraid of breaking The Rules because the whole point was nonconformity and expression.

Now a lot of girls who get into the fashion seem to lack a rebel spirit. Stuff gets labeled ita if the petti is peeking a bit, or the girl is wearing chunky boots, because those aren't "allowed". I think this attitude, at least in the western community, has really stifled creativity. It limits girls to such a narrow style, lest the lolita police bitch about them.

I'm not saying stuff like ita threads is bad. Ita helps girls learn what not to do, by pointing out bad fits and cheap construction and stuff that's tacky or juvenile in a not-cute way. Just it's bad how narrowly many people define "lolita". It seems like only a narrow slice or sweet, classic, and gothic is acceptable anymore. Punk, pirate, decora, ero, EGA, and the rest all get automatically put in the 'ita' category by many people, just because they follow a different ruleset.

>>	Anonymous Fri Oct 4 17:41:58 2019 No.10267637 >>10267631 How would you describe lolita aesthetic back then?

Anonymous Fri Oct 4 17:42:49 2019 No.10267638

>>10267574
The lack of solid basic jsks, the lack of shirred skirts that you can throw on and go, the lack of skirts in general, the over abundance of sweet lolita and the obsession with prints. Don't get me wrong, I still buy new releases from moitie, but this is only because I never had a chance to do so in the past and second hand moitie is not easy to come by, but not impossible.

Anonymous Sat Oct 5 08:25:41 2019 No.10267884

>>10267574
The lack of beautiful lace and more interesting details like pintucks, scallops, actual variety in cuts etc. Everything is a print in the same 4 cuts, chiffon overlay with a basic ruffle or embroidered tulle lace. Blagh. Bring back screenprinted velvet and 4 types of lace on one dress.

Anonymous Sat Oct 5 09:02:59 2019 No.10267894

>>10267574
I miss the creativity. Everything comes in a set now and if your blues aren't an exact match or if you don't follow the 'rurus' you're considered ita. What happened to developing skills such as embroidery or sewing to add a cute personal touch to an outfit. We're spoonfed everything now, even how to style each coord, if you've got enough money you don't have to think, just wear cookie cutter coords like everyone else.

Anonymous Sat Oct 5 09:47:26 2019 No.10267902

>>10267574
Oversaturation. So many busy prints and OTT everything, but it all manages to blend into itself and look generic after a certain point.
In contrast, old school feels more creative and experimental, but somehow simpler in execution. Since there's more diversity in shape/cut, there are more ways to mix and match different items. The smaller details are also more lovely. You might not always get hit with a super unique, eye-catching print, but the entire outfit works together to make an impact.
To me, when someone is wearing old school, it feels like their own personality and flair is always reflected in some way. I find that inspiring, even if it can lend itself to frumpiness. Neo-Lolita, on the other hand, doesn't seem to say much about the wearer when it's done correctly. It's more like filling out a list of set tenets, and that looks nice, but also gets bland.
I also like the idea of being a punk dressed up like a life-size doll, or a gothic illustration from the 90s or 2000s come to life (eg Kaori Yuki or Mitsukazu Mihara's works). Neo-Lolita definitely can't and won't give me that the way old school does.

>>	Anonymous Sat Oct 5 15:28:16 2019 No.10268036 https://youtu.be/nsPoTKlfuJI

Anonymous Sat Oct 5 15:46:32 2019 No.10268041

>>10267574
I used to hate it simply because I didn't like the fabric and lace choices and because I'm not fond of prints. But in the last months I took a close look at current more simple pieces, hauls and close ups with little details you couldn't even see in stock- or worn pictures and I'm starting to get inspired a bit. I think a lot of anons who say modern lolita can't be creative just aren't very creative themselves and can't imagine anything that hasn't been presented in a magazine to them before.

Anonymous Sun Oct 6 02:01:57 2019 No.10268273

>>10268041
I think also what's most easily visible online is always the stuff that is popular, cookie-cutterish and follows a certain look to get likes because that's how algorithms and CoF-type commuities work. I get much more inspired looking at what people call "casual lolita" nowadays (which would have been "lolita" in the 2000s)

Anonymous Sun Oct 6 05:13:04 2019 No.10268299

>>10267574
I hate the lack of skirts and wearable Jsks these days. I know that IW and JetJ are still doing Jsks, but it's the same cut all over again. without any oher detailing and it's just so boring. Victorian Maiden is the only brands that is still nice imo.

I also hate how what used to be a normal outfit 10 years ago is now considered casual or even ita. I stopped posting to COF after somebody called me an ita because the wind blew a strand of hair into my face and my curls were a bt loose.

>>	Anonymous Sun Oct 6 05:35:25 2019 No.10268302 >>10262024 >If you don't conform to MY standards of rebellion then you're not rebelling at all! My god how can you be so annoyed about this and still miss the point

>>	Anonymous Sun Oct 6 11:45:46 2019 No.10268423 >>10268036 I'm going to cry. thank you for this anon. the nostalgia from the music is a lot. love the mismatched patterns in 4:05. big Pink House vibes

>>	Anonymous Sun Oct 6 12:09:17 2019 No.10268442 >>10268036 that green velveteen apron skirt at 26:30 hoooolyshit

>>	Anonymous Sun Oct 6 16:40:11 2019 No.10268535 I know I already posted this in the archive thread, but I'll say it here too just to make sure. If there are any old yaplog blogs you bookmarked, save them now because they close down on January 31th. http://www.yaplog.jp/m/close/

>>	Anonymous Sun Oct 6 22:22:20 2019 No.10268654 >>10268036 >1:17 >3:30 >7:39 (lovely lace monster) >8:52 >11:58 >16:28 >19:38 >21:01 >21:59 >26:35 Iconic outfits.

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 7 02:52:53 2019 No.10268725 File: 66 KB, 720x720, 1498376563145.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Thoughts? I think these both have their merits.

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 7 02:58:33 2019 No.10268727 >>10268725 What are you even asking? These are two entirely different coords and you're in the old school thread so any opinion will obviously be biased towards the second image. Rper be gone.

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 7 03:21:46 2019 No.10268733 >>10268725 >Thoughts? I wish I could live in a baby shop, no matter what era.

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 7 04:09:03 2019 No.10268738 >>10268725 I actually don't care for either of them much. The second one really suffers with the beige mom cardigan.

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 7 04:58:37 2019 No.10268752 >>10268727 If you had actually read the thread, paranoia-chan, you'd see we were already talking about neo-lolita vs old school. The image would just be expanding on that, using two different coords that have the same elements.

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 7 05:11:35 2019 No.10268755 >>10268752 They aren't similar at all. You're just retarded and can't see past the stiff bonnet. Not my fault you write posts like an rping sissy.

Anonymous Mon Oct 7 05:15:11 2019 No.10268756

>>10268725
While I actually like a lot of neo-lolita, I really hate the coord on the left. I think it looks stupid when you have a printed dress that ends so high up and then have miles of underskirts. While the right coord isn’t one of my favourite oldschool coords, I do still love it. Somehow oldschool coords can manage to have a single item in another colour without it sticking out like a sore thumb.

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 7 05:49:56 2019 No.10268762 >>10268725 I can't help laughing at old school stiff bonnets. They look like giant plates

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 7 05:57:18 2019 No.10268765 >>10268755 Go ahead and show me where in that post it reads "They are similar". You sound like a projecting, mangry tranny trying his hardest to fit in after hearing "/cgl/ girls are bitchy tee-hee" from his fellow sissies. Take a pill, seriously.

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 7 12:25:45 2019 No.10268836 >>10268752 the reply function exists for a reason. why are you so assblasted that no one knows wtf your intended context is? you tried but it's clear you're new. lurk more if you want to contribute good discussion starters.

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 7 14:55:43 2019 No.10268883 >>10268765 Your insinuation that they are comparable in the first place; this is where you asserted their similarities.

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 7 15:58:11 2019 No.10268903 >>10268762 Floppy bonnets were also common back then but I agree these huge stiff ones look like a huge plate. Not a fan of the big ones anyway.

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 7 16:14:51 2019 No.10268912 >>10267631 Based post. >>10267574 Goddamn AP polyester. I bought one on a whim and why the fuck is it the same price as cotton Baby dresses that I could pitch a tent with? Literal H&M tier fabric.

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 7 16:14:59 2019 No.10268913 >>10268836 I'm not new at all, actually. You just lack proper reading comprehension, and I'm sorry it took a 4chan post to break it to you.

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 7 16:16:19 2019 No.10268914 >>10268883 That's how you chose to read into it, not what it actually says.

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 7 16:27:29 2019 No.10268917 >>10268836 >what are context clues >what is context in general I'm not new at all, actually. You just lack proper reading comprehension, and I'm sorry it took a 4chan post to break it to you. There's no excuse for impaired deductive reasoning skills.

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 7 16:34:25 2019 No.10268918 File: 43 KB, 500x669, 92dfa615e7ac70ca4bf2433e8655a66e.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 7 16:37:51 2019 No.10268919 File: 120 KB, 738x1050, n0qt0lIQsg1rwigauo1_1280.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 7 16:41:22 2019 No.10268921 File: 73 KB, 432x594, a805c472b49081cb16491415980ad8aa.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 7 16:42:45 2019 No.10268923 File: 88 KB, 430x594, 352a392c47c5ab07ec9bae93076bd8af.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 7 16:47:03 2019 No.10268926 File: 19 KB, 226x392, 5bd3238e1959f3e4cb5d7c4454047296.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 7 16:48:25 2019 No.10268928 File: 106 KB, 463x700, e2b823fc5c21111314d4071388f1d724.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 7 16:49:45 2019 No.10268930 File: 221 KB, 500x667, pm1xzlOrlz1ulg4izo4_500.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 7 16:52:13 2019 No.10268932 File: 51 KB, 488x750, 826a5187e01b09dde6494f5885fac31c.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 7 16:55:18 2019 No.10268934 File: 87 KB, 564x775, 2b541023b6ef69fc4ea66dd7ad0e433b.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 7 16:57:30 2019 No.10268935 File: 70 KB, 341x594, 4f9273c09b4f9b6ecb00618fc1dab792.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 7 17:03:39 2019 No.10268937 >>10268934 that's the kind of shit I like, on the right

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 7 17:09:24 2019 No.10268940 File: 21 KB, 247x356, a18c13d14a6fd2e2a7f8eeb6b7fb5607.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 7 17:17:11 2019 No.10268944 File: 79 KB, 358x594, e2a9fab523a29da67a7fef02fd4b07ae.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 7 17:19:50 2019 No.10268946 File: 22 KB, 300x400, ddf2bd5e89fe2df76f65f216fa207bfe.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 7 17:20:47 2019 No.10268947 >>10268917 no one cares. >>10268926 what a strong presence. that stare. this is Kato-san, right?

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 7 17:25:03 2019 No.10268950 File: 42 KB, 360x481, 2cff3b71145ab58259706d57d43124d3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 7 17:26:04 2019 No.10268951 >>10268947 >no one cares Then stop replying and actually contribute to the thread.

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 7 17:27:53 2019 No.10268952 File: 26 KB, 250x333, 2688d86a9d1883fc74bf726d5be743da.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 7 17:29:07 2019 No.10268953 File: 80 KB, 496x750, b988277beb72d8478c6c024bd92057aa.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] yamero

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 7 17:30:35 2019 No.10268954 File: 53 KB, 488x683, 801ecca92369487afeddeb497a8c10eb.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 7 17:31:55 2019 No.10268956 File: 43 KB, 400x602, b08eb3ed6664914acf69c101abe8a853.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 7 17:32:55 2019 No.10268957 File: 28 KB, 250x448, 9ced59cd8202cd86ba6e7ada79f11545.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 7 17:40:53 2019 No.10268962 File: 72 KB, 417x750, fe81ac36e7f4a055648012422e7c6272.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 7 17:41:17 2019 No.10268963 >>10268918 It's not old school it has modern lace

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 8 11:52:21 2019 No.10269287 What are some popular misconceptions about old school style? Which one you hate the most? My all time favourite is "old school is about wearing solid pieces without prints"

Anonymous Tue Oct 8 15:59:41 2019 No.10269375

>>10269287
>old school is about wearing solid pieces without prints

My favorite oldschool pieces are almost all prints, I just like the overall simpler design of older prints VS modern ones. Most of the current oldschoolers seem to stick to solids or all-over designs like tartan or gobelin. I wish they would wear more prints because there's so many that I never see worn anymore.

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 8 16:11:14 2019 No.10269380 >>10268963 tulle lace isnt necessarily modern, iw and moitie used it in early 2000s

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 8 20:58:45 2019 No.10269486 >>10268914 Ok let's all just compare dogs and oranges because they're both made of matter! Totally worth comparing.

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 8 21:01:16 2019 No.10269487 >>10269287 Only black with white lace means old school.

>>	Anonymous Wed Oct 9 15:45:36 2019 No.10269903 >>10269486 Stop shitting up the thread.

>>	Anonymous Wed Oct 9 20:26:23 2019 No.10270038 hate to be that person but anyone got an invite to the oldschool discord? I know people say it’s shit but a friend said it would be good to join if only for the sharing of links and stuff

>>	Anonymous Wed Oct 9 20:27:31 2019 No.10270040 >>10269487 shit bait

>>	Anonymous Wed Oct 9 20:40:15 2019 No.10270048 >>10270040 >What are some popular misconceptions about old school style? >misconceptions lrn2read

>>	Anonymous Wed Oct 9 21:14:25 2019 No.10270098 >>10270048 ah fuck my bad

>>	Anonymous Wed Oct 9 22:23:40 2019 No.10270135 >>10270038 They don't accept seagulls.

>>	Anonymous Wed Oct 9 23:44:19 2019 No.10270179 >>10270135 Yes they do. They're all seagulls. Lol.

>>	Anonymous Thu Oct 10 00:35:52 2019 No.10270198 >>10270179 They banned several people for posting about conversations here and screenshotting the discord chats.

>>	Anonymous Thu Oct 10 00:39:57 2019 No.10270199 >>10270198 Anyone should be banned for screenshotting discord chats tho The main server does the same thing

>>	Anonymous Thu Oct 10 00:50:00 2019 No.10270205 The server sucks anyways, I think one of the mods isn't even a lolita

>>	Anonymous Thu Oct 10 00:54:01 2019 No.10270206 >>10270205 Is he still there? That guy made me so uncomfortable.

>>	Anonymous Thu Oct 10 01:04:33 2019 No.10270211 >>10270206 There's a male too? I'm talking about the annoying kpop retard.

>>	Anonymous Thu Oct 10 02:04:54 2019 No.10270238 >>10270211 >annoying kpop retard Sounds familiar. Does he go by the name Caesar?

>>	Anonymous Thu Oct 10 02:32:24 2019 No.10270252 >>10270238 no I'm pretty sure the person they're referring to is a girl who's irl friends with this girl >>10265129

>>	Anonymous Thu Oct 10 03:09:58 2019 No.10270265 >>10270198 How are they supposed to know who is posting here? They kicked one person because she tried to gossip about them in another server.

>>	Anonymous Thu Oct 10 03:12:20 2019 No.10270267 >>10270205 >>10270211 No, she is a lolita and actually looks pretty cute in it. It's the oldschooler with the extremely curly hair.

Anonymous Thu Oct 10 03:24:25 2019 No.10270274

>>10270265
They also kicked some girl for screen shotting conversations to complain about the server, she also called girls itas for giving her gentle crit. The server she posted the screen shots to proceeded to drag her for it, but I left discord around that time so I don't know what ever came of it.

>>	Anonymous Thu Oct 10 15:50:03 2019 No.10270575 >>10270198 >>10270199 How would they even know who to ban for screenshotting chats? Are they friends with a janitor or something?

>>	Anonymous Thu Oct 10 15:51:08 2019 No.10270577 File: 118 KB, 564x955, eb3589c4e865dfd7dde45c7e2e8ebc57.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Thu Oct 10 15:52:58 2019 No.10270580 File: 235 KB, 1200x1600, HI3C0014-2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Thu Oct 10 15:59:42 2019 No.10270592 File: 286 KB, 641x1024, z_a371a477.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Thu Oct 10 16:03:00 2019 No.10270597 File: 214 KB, 643x1024, z_fb5a5d2b.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Thu Oct 10 16:05:23 2019 No.10270600 File: 75 KB, 383x527, nwnn55NFEG1rvv8igo1_400.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] bring back mini hats

>>	Anonymous Thu Oct 10 16:09:17 2019 No.10270608 File: 179 KB, 740x1024, z_739272bb.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Thu Oct 10 16:10:59 2019 No.10270611 File: 146 KB, 740x1024, z_ba9598f5.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10270600

>>	Anonymous Thu Oct 10 16:28:56 2019 No.10270625 >>10270205 Sorry you got kicked for starting drama

>>	Anonymous Thu Oct 10 16:34:26 2019 No.10270628 >>10270597 Why didn’t they release more dresses with that heart lace? It’s beautiful.

>>	Anonymous Thu Oct 10 16:36:01 2019 No.10270630 File: 127 KB, 630x870, z_ef5be6f6.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Thu Oct 10 19:57:59 2019 No.10270706 >>10270274 they also kicked a girl for having irl mental health problems in front of the mod. They were friends.

>>	Anonymous Thu Oct 10 19:59:36 2019 No.10270707 >>10270706 whaat? details please

>>	Anonymous Thu Oct 10 20:06:53 2019 No.10270712 >>10270274 Yes, we are talking about the same girl. She's quite the ita herself.

>>	Anonymous Thu Oct 10 20:15:02 2019 No.10270719 >>10270707 I don't think it's well known but it has to do with why she was banned from her comm

>>	Anonymous Thu Oct 10 20:50:48 2019 No.10270740 >>10270706 "Irl mental health problems" lol.

>>	Anonymous Fri Oct 11 23:49:37 2019 No.10271367 >>10270267 This is honestly not ringing any bells and I thought I knew all the oldschoolers.

>>	Anonymous Sat Oct 12 00:09:16 2019 No.10271371 >>10270740 Right lol

>>	Anonymous Sun Oct 13 09:48:04 2019 No.10271843 >>10271367 they're confused between two people

>>	Anonymous Sun Oct 13 12:07:35 2019 No.10271876 >>10270211 She still wears lolita you moron

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 14 17:47:10 2019 No.10272584 >>10271367 the kpop girl is literally >>10265127

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 14 18:05:00 2019 No.10272592 >>10272584 Lol weak bait

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 14 22:49:36 2019 No.10272669 >>10272592 I don't see how it's bait, everyone was confused abt who the curly haired kpop girl >>10270211 >>10270238

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 15 05:48:58 2019 No.10272793 >>10272669 The curly haired girl and the kpop girl are two different people

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 15 07:40:10 2019 No.10272817 This thread is dead

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 15 09:21:32 2019 No.10272837 >>10272669 That's not her, retard

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 15 10:10:50 2019 No.10272851 File: 224 KB, 645x1024, z_b2e6cd1b.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 12:26:07 2019 No.10276548 File: 59 KB, 500x500, ecdb34bfadbc2f837017ef035af3185536cb1866r1-500-500v2_hq.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 12:27:11 2019 No.10276550 File: 118 KB, 640x1326, 73245047_1495052333975485_1238998297100681216_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10276548

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 12:28:12 2019 No.10276551 File: 103 KB, 324x564, 72414192_3358296270854972_2411228303928066048_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10276550

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 12:29:19 2019 No.10276553 File: 1.13 MB, 1207x1775, 65386363_1507325509401895_5195519739224391680_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10276551

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 12:30:24 2019 No.10276554 File: 834 KB, 1407x2048, 67176700_1522216417912804_189962314693214208_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10276553

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 12:31:28 2019 No.10276556 File: 1.02 MB, 1348x2048, 67277049_1522220647912381_4864849275097448448_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10276554

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 12:32:31 2019 No.10276557 File: 791 KB, 1137x2048, 67369932_1522220314579081_4620396534226223104_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10276556

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 12:35:52 2019 No.10276558 File: 77 KB, 480x640, 09f04965-ac95-54a9-9298-3827ff3ee9c5.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10276557

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 13:38:49 2019 No.10276600 >>10276556 Love her hair.

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 23:05:53 2019 No.10276923 >>10276556 This isn't lolita in the slightest

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 23:09:58 2019 No.10276929 >>10276923 The katakana at the top literally say "baabii" AKA Barbie style I'm guessing while the other says "gosurori" and actually is early lolita

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 23:19:38 2019 No.10276937 >>10276923 Don’t be so shallow. There’s much to be appreciated in lolita predecessors

>>	Anonymous Thu Oct 24 22:36:55 2019 No.10277975 >>10276929 A prototype for lolita already existed at the time and it did not look like this. It's an obvious mistake there's been tons of them over the years I mean look at >>10259787

>>	Anonymous Fri Oct 25 05:16:57 2019 No.10278068 >>10277975 >A prototype for lolita already existed at the time and it did not look like this. Post it.

>>	Anonymous Fri Oct 25 08:47:27 2019 No.10278113 >>10277975 I mean it can still be appreciated for what it is. Personally I think the hair is cute and I’d try it with lolita

Anonymous Fri Oct 25 09:29:19 2019 No.10278123

>>10278068
the other page of the same magazine, dingbat >>10276557
(she might not have the big skirt but she’s got everything else down and is wearing brand, and the lolita silhouette wasn’t set in stone yet so volume-less skirts were acceptable in many cases)

>>	Anonymous Fri Oct 25 21:11:49 2019 No.10278398 New thread: >>10278363 >>10278363 >>10278363

Advanced search
Text to find
Subject [?]Search by post subject. Leave empty for any.
Username [?]Search for user name. Leave empty for any user name.
Tripcode [?]Search for tripcode. Leave empty for any.
Email [?]Search by email. Leave empty for any.
Filename [?]Search by image filename. Leave empty for any.
From Date [?]Enter what date to start searching from. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
To Date [?]Enter what date to start searching until. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
Image hash
Search in	All Posts OPs Only
Deleted posts	Show all posts Show only deleted posts Only show non-deleted posts
Internal posts	Show all posts Show only internal posts Show only archived posts
Order	New posts first Old posts first
Capcode	All Posts Only by Users Only by Mods Only by Admins Only by Developers
Results	Posts Threads
Action	[ Simple ]

/cgl/ - Cosplay & EGL