>>10239895
People are stupid, and misinformation... Regarding U.S. law, you know that it's not technically illegal to take photos of people in a public setting. It's a law often touted by aggressive photographers, and it's why people don't get arrested. However, it's illegal to try surreptitiously taking photos of people in a state of undress. You can take a photo of a chick's ass in a bikini so long that she's in a public setting, yes. However, it's still illegal to go to the effort of taking an up-skirt photo in public because that wasn't something presented to the public. It counts as a state of undress. I can't tell you about Chinese law, but that's the answer to the why people have the question of, "Who is in the wrong," that >>10239873 referenced. Call the people who say this 'scrotes' or not, it's oftentimes the source of why people feel they have the right to question it. Misinformation. Many who are sexist receive, from their unique sources, misinformation that's used both to anger & harass. [An example being the difference between inebriated and intoxicated in written law versus simply using the word 'drunk' in articles.]