I never said people should feel entitled to sex because someone wore sexy clothes, I may be dumb but I'm not outright retarded.
However. Sexy clothes, their very purpose, is to provoke sexual envy from the other gender. To deny or fail to recognize that is at best ignorance and at worst, hyprocrisy. The reason you like those whether you acknowledge it or not is because they provoke said reaction.
People shouldn't treat you like a piece of meat, I strongly hinted at that. Do me, and yourself, the favor of reading, rather than merely interpreting, what I said.
This is like a chain of event, first you give hints that you're willing to partake in a relationship, then you partake in said relationship, then you have sex, and finally you procreate.
Once you manifest a signal corresponding to one of these steps, you can't just decide all of the ones that follow are irrelevant, men should be able to take a step back and realize you're just playing pretend, but let's be real, weebs and the other kind of neets going to cons are so affection deprived that they just don't have the mental strength to act approriately around women.
Of course they're gonna be stupid, the only thing they want in life is affection, and you're going around, giving signals corresponding to the idea that you're in fact willing to give said affection. They're in too deep to realize this is just pretend.
Not to mention the few rare occasions where sluts that are mostly in for the sex do the thing. That's the kind of stories you hear about, and people only need to hear about it once to have faith that they'll be the next lucky guy, in the very same way people get into a casino, expecting to win atleast once, and leave without a penny. Supersition is innate, so is the gambler's fallacy.