[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / g / ic / jp / lit / sci / tg / vr ] [ index / top / reports / report a bug ] [ 4plebs / archived.moe / rbt ]

Support us on Patreon!

/cgl/ - Cosplay & EGL

View post   

[ Toggle deleted replies ]
File: 157 KB, 812x658, _20190515_201841.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10169865 No.10169865 [Reply] [Original] [rbt]

Minimum accessories, inconspicuous prints, simple main-pieces, basic hairstyles, solids, no crazy make-up, only 1 petticoat, nothing too fancy, no glitter or glamour etc

>> No.10169866
File: 260 KB, 1042x1321, _20190515_202211.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10169868
File: 179 KB, 569x758, _20190515_195844.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10169870
File: 160 KB, 947x1080, _20190515_202229.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10169871

We already have a casual lolita thread why do you need another

>> No.10169872
File: 91 KB, 661x1080, _20190515_204417.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10169874
File: 58 KB, 602x688, _20190515_204359.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10169876

nice bait

>> No.10169879

Nice inapplicable buzzword

>> No.10169880

fishing for (you)s = bait

>> No.10169882

That’s not what I was doing, I was asking why we need to make multiples of the same threads that aren’t even at bump limit. We already have the catalog shat up with feels threads and dumb ass one off questions that newfags ask. But go off I guess. Must be pretty miserable seeing everything in a negative light.

>> No.10169884
File: 73 KB, 512x794, 2d6f5d155327d43139bc3b05cb9e76d5.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

these coords don't belong in the casual lolita thread, they're just normal lolita coords. i'm sure you've seen people argue about it dozens of times that's why you thought it would be good bait to shit up a thread

>> No.10169886

there's a difference between toned down coordinates and casual ones. is this >>10169866
casual to you?

>> No.10169893 [DELETED] 
File: 178 KB, 350x635, 54.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Not OP but the people in the casual thread were fighting about toned down vs casual.
It doesn't hurt. This board is slow anyway.

>> No.10169896
File: 65 KB, 647x861, _20190515_210617.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

If you know it's bait stop taking it


>> No.10169898
File: 51 KB, 635x862, _20190515_210559.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10169900
File: 62 KB, 547x1080, _20190515_210541.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10169901

Scrape the sand out of your cunt any time now, I’m sure it’ll improve your mood.

It’s casual enough. Having a lot of lace doesn’t suddenly make it not casual.

>> No.10169904
File: 77 KB, 522x1080, _20190515_212124.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10169906
File: 65 KB, 530x1080, _20190515_212112.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10169909

This would be. so much better if she used white instead of ivory

>> No.10169932

the other thread literally says "don't post normal toned down coords" this is a thread for normal toned down coords

>> No.10169934

And countless CoF threads have started with “don’t argue”, but does that do anything?

>> No.10170038

That's a little different because it's trying to dictate text as opposed to the types of photos. This is an image board meant for discussion. Its uncensored so arguments that spawned from discussions are bound to happen but if someone is doing a photo dump it's pretty easy to follow guidelines.

>> No.10170040

It’s abritrary, not against any rules, and not an inforceable thing.

>> No.10170044


>> No.10170071
File: 453 KB, 868x1326, Casual.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Shut up holy shit. You of all people need to not be talking when you post too fast like this. Just gotta post don't ya?

Anyway let's talk about on topic things like toned down coords.

>> No.10170075

Who shat in your tea? Or are you normally this big of a cunt?

>> No.10170077

what dress is that?

>> No.10170079

naryt but you're the one who entered this thread just to whine. we want to see toned down coords, please be quiet

>> No.10170084

News flash, you can’t moderate other peoples posts unless you’re a mod. Are you one? No? Then why do you think you have authority over others?

>> No.10170090

says the person trying to show enough authority to end an entire thread. stop baiting for reports by saying dumb shit like that

>> No.10170092

>baiting for reports

Man you are just full on mentally retarded aren’t you?

>> No.10170094

>Must be pretty miserable seeing everything in a negative light.
ask yourself, holy crap lol.

>> No.10170096

what dress is this?

>> No.10170100
File: 596 KB, 1030x1061, Some anons are just assholes.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10170102

getting mad at this thread!!!111

oof i am not a fan of the color balance in this one

>> No.10170104

Maybe if you idiots would stop responding the thread could be on topic. Not that hard.

>> No.10170109
File: 533 KB, 1055x1327, Can you announce a report in an image name.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Not them but it made sense to me

>> No.10170111

stop talking to it, just report it like it wants you to. they themselves said they're unwilling to listen to rules so arguing is useless

>> No.10170115
File: 369 KB, 797x1062, You just want your own yous.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Pffft so much easier said than done

>> No.10170119

This coord has been posted in two separate inspo threads, but different pics of it and neither is the pic that was on CoF recently. It's v cute but this is starting to smell like self post...

>> No.10170121

Please take your own advice instead of trying to boss me around
I'm on your side but you can't even tell because you are so clearly fucked in the head

>> No.10170124

im so tired of this print

two different people told you to stop, i'm not the same person. bizarre that trying to keep a thread on topic is "fucked in the head" to you but hey be my guest and keep going if you want

>> No.10170127
File: 987 KB, 1054x1329, How long will file names take for dumb gulls.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

I'm just going through the lolitafashion hashtag on ig
I don't know any of these girls nor do I follow them

>> No.10170130
File: 373 KB, 488x1066, Fuck off already my god.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Damn I dropped my image
Any way
You are in fact dense but please keep going
I needed the laugh

>> No.10170134

is that a rilakkuma itabag?

>> No.10170137

Looks like it

>> No.10170138

why are you arguing with now and why? you're laughing because the OP said to stay on topic?

>> No.10170139
File: 579 KB, 1051x1057, Omg did they really leave thank fuck.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

It doesn't look rilakkuma shaped so I'm not sure

>> No.10170140

thanks for the warning now I know not to post any time soon

>> No.10170141

i'd love to see the details on it. what's her IG name?

>> No.10170160


>headcanon: the posters who say 'i'm not posting' are the same ones shitting up the thread just so they can shit the thread up more

change my mind.

>> No.10170164
File: 137 KB, 333x500, 1555773344778.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

here you go. im >>10170140 and here are my fave tone down coords

>> No.10170166

It’s impossible to change the mind of the mentally ill with logic

>> No.10170167
File: 180 KB, 500x667, 1552046905909.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10170168
File: 57 KB, 449x645, 1554268400722.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10170174
File: 835 KB, 1000x1834, 2012fh2451_innocent_front_0.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10170194

Oh so that's why you tried to shit up the thread. Skin not thicc enough huh?

>> No.10170252

You could still post and not use the hashtag but it's pretty obvious you're full of shit.

>> No.10170264


People who are cognitively challenged tend to not recognize jokes and humor. Sorry, anon.


Thanks for contributing three images, at least one of which is very clearly from social media.

>> No.10170275
File: 112 KB, 500x666, tumblr_pcs1w9vKUy1rqn00po1_500 (1).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

32ki is my absolute favorite for toned down.

These days I think especially in classic lolita that a normal coordinate is 'toned down' in everyone else's eyes, but I'll try my best.

>> No.10170277
File: 109 KB, 500x666, tumblr_pg4i8ci9P31r816kf_500.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10170278
File: 542 KB, 1280x1919, tumblr_p9ewmfLykp1qecu65o1_1280.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10170281
File: 574 KB, 1280x1920, tumblr_p07ecaELBB1qecu65o1_1280.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10170284
File: 349 KB, 1195x1920, tumblr_ousk3j2cko1utp4f8o1_1280.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10170288
File: 101 KB, 482x750, tumblr_p5svxg9yqA1rw9jcfo4_500.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10170291
File: 215 KB, 600x800, tumblr_nef6dwpu9v1rex23do1_640.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10170292
File: 165 KB, 682x1024, tumblr_pafcbprdyj1s0s3nuo1_1280.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10170294
File: 498 KB, 997x1496, tumblr_oultv50dvj1qcfpzpo1_1280.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10170298
File: 188 KB, 1080x1350, kuian_an_59498524_1045380332325259_8253599928028258372_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10170299
File: 121 KB, 1080x1080, midorifukasawa_55906305_222043705439641_626578446360207308_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10170300
File: 90 KB, 1080x1080, xixifroufrou_58410481_2349419978456632_6146523504229671544_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10170302
File: 387 KB, 1280x1706, tumblr_owa0nvOmO51vr8y8co1_1280.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10170303
File: 115 KB, 1080x1350, maijuline_53224228_313357622679456_5692039931385747440_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10170305

Looks like there's tamagotchis in it.

>> No.10170363
File: 498 KB, 750x731, 454FBCFD-B813-47EF-8470-2891758CE91F.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

All for this thread, more please!

>> No.10170365
File: 401 KB, 750x827, A754F0F0-8F2A-4C24-8F69-EF68A5407F59.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.10170366
File: 529 KB, 750x751, BAE41F86-6BA4-44FF-A794-11F02495F5CA.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10170595

I posted it in the fave coord thread but I like that one much better than the one posted here. I don't even like holy lantern desu but that picture is just my taste.

>> No.10170599

so cute

>> No.10170604

Ooh which bag is that?
I have a mighty need

>> No.10170624
File: 59 KB, 285x733, tumblr_oszqc8Nb2u1wo5eaeo1_1280.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.10170625

How? This girl looks skinnier than me, and the jsk fits her so nicely. Meanwhile, I'm swimming in this fatty-chan tier dress that is 2 sizes too big on me. Is it my lack of boobs? Did AP fucked the shirring?

>> No.10170627
File: 348 KB, 473x640, tumblr_p6xdvtV7CY1wo5eaeo2_r1_500.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10170629
File: 127 KB, 900x1200, tumblr_pd7mbxqFNx1wo5eaeo2_1280.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10170633
File: 320 KB, 480x641, P15OP307_model-01.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10170636
File: 58 KB, 1280x720, 1312958229750.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

I need her.

>> No.10170690

Maybe she's tall and you're short

>> No.10170754

I have it in ivory in the zipper jsk cut, and its only fitting if you have a good bust placement for it. The top part of the bust sticks out for boobs to be placed there.

>> No.10170838

The model or the dress?

>> No.10171687

Did you buy used? It's possible the previous owner stretched the shirring.

>> No.10171692
File: 468 KB, 750x750, 744564E3-AAAF-42CA-955A-D89F4E18167A.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.10171693
File: 692 KB, 750x754, 885A9180-FB43-416E-96AD-CF0EE9EABB54.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10171694
File: 768 KB, 750x920, 2D902DE7-7424-4448-B34D-A050B5EFA952.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10171696
File: 628 KB, 750x750, 2DB6F457-240F-4355-BB9A-BAAAB02D5A4B.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10171698
File: 375 KB, 750x731, 72DE5DB1-6262-4FEA-AB6A-7034BA9B81E1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10171700
File: 737 KB, 750x737, 399C4CFA-A2B7-463F-A607-9C944BA8BAD6.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10171718
File: 490 KB, 750x726, 2D4E2EF4-7CCB-41D6-969B-D76C6F08D1D4.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10171769

Is this even Lolita anymore? Looks pretty vintage style. Only thing would be the length of the skirt being not quite long enough

>> No.10171771

She’s wearing almost entirely Innocent World. Every time I read this “is this even lolita” comment on totally normal and polished classic coords I die a little inside.

>> No.10171772

The capitalization of Lolita suggests newfag or fetishist who thinks lolita fashion = trying to look like a little girl.

>> No.10171797

I agree that most of her outfits don't even read as lolita. And whatever she uses on her face to shoop it always makes her teeth look brown.

>> No.10171801
File: 463 KB, 750x756, 97B5B98D-D2A8-4142-9EF6-890AC252C1EC.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Brown teeth, that one’s new. Take your vendetta somewhere else.

>> No.10171804
File: 573 KB, 750x933, 66AC9AF9-25F6-4FBC-81E4-4D4AD09FA870.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

I think the problem is that not that many recent adoptees/fans of the fashion are even aware of what classic brands like MM look like, beyond maybe popular pieces like Whyteleafe and Antoinette Fleur. And a lot don’t actually wear lolita, especially not on a daily basis, so they have no interest in the comfort/general presentability of a coord.

>> No.10171817

It kinds looks like she put her makeup on with Meitu in the full length photo.

>> No.10171822

I don't think you know what classic lolita normally looks like so keep your opinions to yourself

>> No.10171824

I love this! So cute.

>> No.10171838

can anyone ID this dress?

>> No.10171862

It’s tagged as Emily Temple Cute, not sure what dress.

>> No.10171886

does anyone know if that's an actually vivienne westwood beret or it's just a brooch?

>> No.10171916

Are there any ig lolitas who post these kinds of looks frequently?

>> No.10171923

Recklessrave posts almost every day and wears toned down lolita.

>> No.10171926
File: 372 KB, 750x757, CD8EF47B-2935-41C6-B421-76BAF78D12CE.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

I like her classic coords, but I have to admit I am slightly alarmed by the endlessness of her wardrobe.

>> No.10171932

Anyone who wears classic more regularly? I’m looking for toned down classic inspo beyond FR.

>> No.10172135
File: 730 KB, 750x907, 968267F1-F37D-4434-8FBA-29275E6C2E8F.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.10172153
File: 626 KB, 750x771, 2D1DFB17-EC1C-4038-9780-CFEE5310EB11.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10172161

No its not. Check the archives, it's been argued about before.

>> No.10172177

Im more alarmed by her glasses

>> No.10172178

Who tf cares, this is a thread about toned-down coords not toned-brown teeth.

>> No.10172200

Yeah, they’re not flattering. I thought for the longest time that she was a crossdresser. But I do like many of her coords and she seems like a nice, genuine person.

>> No.10172205
File: 602 KB, 750x750, 0FE74262-06DD-4F27-BFD4-3A0ECCB53083.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.10172206

Genuinely delulu

>> No.10172262
File: 480 KB, 750x748, F49D3AD5-C7FA-44A2-87C5-0244873F8913.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

What do you mean by delulu?

I feel like most coords you see on ig are toned down. People post their daily outfits there more than they do on cof, which could give you an artificially exaggerated idea of what lolita looks like.

>> No.10172265
File: 496 KB, 750x743, 2038DBF2-90D2-4C9C-BFE5-EB3902F2238B.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10172305

is that an unfortunate wig or did she just get really absurdly cut bangs which extend past her forehead? it looks like a bowl cut.

>> No.10172415

I didn't say she wasn't wearing Lolita brands.... But there is something about the combination and the shape of petti that just gives off cute vintage vibes rather than Lolita to me. I'm not fully sure what the difference is... But come on, you have to admit the incredibly plain perfectly a-line low-poof skirt is not terribly lolita.

In the end they are just words though. Categories were made for man, not man for categories.

>> No.10172423

>Gets proven wrong

"Who cares anyway?"
Nice deflection, bitter hag

>> No.10172486
File: 24 KB, 345x437, 3CA30936-70A1-4EE7-AC34-533E47CC83DE.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


I feel like it’s the same shape as they do in their stock photos so it’s worn the way the brand meant for it to be worn. I don’t see an issue with that. If you’re used to bells and whistles sure it may not read lolita to you, but this is just as much lolita as anything else out there.

>> No.10172487

Nayrt but I definitely feel like this sort of comment has become more common as vintage/retro fashion has exploded back into the mainstream. Back in the day this silhouette was odd to see aside from the diehard vintage fashion enthusiast, but since vintage fashion, second hand etc has become mainstream rather than a collector's thing there has been more overlap between lolita and "vintage" because there's more of the latter visible.

>> No.10172513
File: 33 KB, 345x437, 485B697B-6570-4551-BCCB-649F6809EF8C.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Bitter hag? You’re the one obsessively searching for flaws on someone more attractive and popular than you, lol.
Also, in what universe is something not lolita because it’s solid and a-line?

>> No.10172650
File: 182 KB, 1162x2048, 1441687176817.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.10172651

This is my aesthetic holy shit

>> No.10172652
File: 499 KB, 505x700, stotome.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

I really just want to shake her and give her a little bit of a makeover - new glasses, for one thing, and even if she doesn't want to do anything with her hair she could definitely get a more flattering haircut. The other person that makes me feel like this is amy whatsherface from back in the livejournal days.

>> No.10172736

You're responding to more than one anon and that anon is baiting.

>> No.10173011
File: 578 KB, 750x881, 810742C5-22EE-43E9-9B16-1529AF22FD1E.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Tokkigo wears other styles but probably posts toned down classic most often.

>> No.10173028

This is a really cute coord and she looks good otherwise but damn do I hate when girls do that wristcuff on the ankle thing. Especially with these tights and shoes it breaks up the entire line of the leg which could have been so elegant.

>> No.10173106

Those are ankle socks

>> No.10173156

whos this? she's so pretty.

>> No.10173271

Oh my bad, didn't see that before and it didn't really occur to me it could be ankle socks as she's wearing a warm-looking coat.

>> No.10173317

Looks like a spring coat to me

>> No.10173326

not feeling the hiking boots, but other boots would make this perfect. The ribbon around her waist is so precious.

>> No.10173327

fuck, what dress is this? aside from the color it's literally perfect.

>> No.10173368

>coat covering dress
>no accessories, plain black tights and boots

You cant even tell this is lolita

>> No.10173412

If you aren’t looking at these photos close enough to be able to tell that those are socks then you aren’t really looking at these photos in enough detail to make any valid critiques, Anon.

>> No.10173427

Not everyone wants to be posted on a /cgl/ with all the disgusting crossover it gets with other boards.

>> No.10173433 [DELETED] 

It's an IW OP

>> No.10173436

That is the dress

>> No.10173437

It's an IW OP

>> No.10173442

Isn't this the OP she modeled in OnS 3?

>> No.10173457

Likely you LOL

>> No.10173460

I wanna see it for myself (the discussion), so pls give me some tags to search. I too agree that it doesn't really look lolita, it is something a vintage girl would wear, but I am not the one to judge. I am not baiting, I swear to god.

>> No.10173466

I think that anon was talking about the brown teeth thing, but the lolita-or-normie-vintage thing has been discussed a lot too. I think your best bet is to just search for "Fanny", "Fanny Rosie" or "vintage" in the archives.

>> No.10173468

Well I still really like vintage, and I love this thread and am getting a lot of inspo from it. I just don't want to pull from vintage so much that I go up to a Meetup basically not wearing Lolita thinking I'm wearing Lolita. I still really like her outfits, im just sure I'd feel out of place at, say, a tea party

>> No.10173476


Ok, so don’t? Live your life man. You don’t need to be a fanny clone.

>> No.10173489

Our autocorrect. My phone capitalizes the word all the God damn time

>> No.10173703

itt: people who don't know what classic lolita is

>> No.10173725
File: 102 KB, 480x640, 1412246317330.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.10173727
File: 81 KB, 383x527, tumblr_o7ko8hUQKR1uea1yfo1_400.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10173729
File: 23 KB, 220x468, eb063cbb28b7d3103005b4ef1b1bfee5.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10173732
File: 116 KB, 800x800, 56935400_864458883915204_6953644510653444750_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10173734
File: 99 KB, 1080x1080, 59563187_422638528527988_5888503638377724390_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10173742
File: 219 KB, 1080x1080, 55957913_295290354696281_2586328377153052901_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10173746
File: 105 KB, 1004x1216, 54513019_283306245927989_4022804243331630951_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10173747
File: 190 KB, 1080x1080, 52899592_476937666172529_8490582488142528051_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10173754

So uh, can you answer the question or nah?

>> No.10175251

More like itcgl

>> No.10175399

I don't want to be posted here either so I don't use the tag. I don't get posted.
Learn how to use apps.

>> No.10175401

Semi-This. Classic's natural form has become invisible with all the OTT classic around. But there's a lot of sweet in this thread too

>> No.10175524

Yeah but nobody is calling the sweet coords unrecognisable as lolita

>> No.10175640

Anyone have deets on those shoes?

>> No.10175653
File: 434 KB, 400x600, tumblr_ootqw5Ju3j1sd87t7o3_400.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


The latest AP release would have me saying otherwise. It looks like a cheap halloween costume from the 1950s.

Anyways it probably is a matter of taste. Lolita is a spectrum for all the different substyles and to think everything must look like a certain magazine photoshoot is a bit ridiculous.

Back to posting nice toned down classic lolita.

>> No.10175655
File: 415 KB, 400x600, tumblr_ootqw5Ju3j1sd87t7o1_400.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10175658
File: 440 KB, 400x600, tumblr_ootqw5Ju3j1sd87t7o2_400.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10175675
File: 51 KB, 400x600, tumblr_ootqw5Ju3j1sd87t7o4_400.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10175691

I can't help but feel like the divisiveness on Fanny's coords comes from her face itself. She's the typical "classically pretty," which we all know means "white". She looks as white as a white girl can look. Classic lolita and vintage fashion have a lot of cross-over, which can cause confusion, but if you see an Asian girl wearing, say, >>10171801 it will undoubtedly read as lolita because we know lolita as a Japanese fashion and we know that this outfit fulfills the requirements of a proper coord. You take one look at Fanny's face and, probably on a subconscious level, think that this very European-looking girl must be going for a traditional western vintage fashion look instead of the inspired Japanese one because it does have a lot of vintage elements and you'll consider those before remembering that yes, she still fulfills the elements of a lolita coord.
I think other girls with very white features aren't questioned as much because even their classic coords have some sweet elements like teaparties or giant hairbows (and whether that even is still classic is a whole other thing I'm not getting into) that look off enough to register as purely vintage.

>> No.10175693

the photo you referenced looks lolita already, even on her. But a lot of her other coords do not, nor would I say they were lolita on an asian.

>> No.10175696

Love this era of VM. Wish they would do more tailored pieces like this.

>> No.10175698

>I think other girls with very white features aren't questioned as much because even their classic coords have some sweet elements like teaparties or giant hairbows
Don't forget hime cuts

>> No.10175882

God yes i would give my left tit for some gorgeous solids like those.

>> No.10175888

>if you see an Asian girl wearing, say, >>10171801 it will undoubtedly read as lolita because we know lolita as a Japanese fashion and we know that this outfit fulfills the requirements of a proper coord.
damn. really good point.

>> No.10175910

They don’t tend to go for very much secondhand, so no need to give either of them.

>> No.10175913
File: 1.07 MB, 750x937, F5DB72E3-53A7-4214-A834-AFB590CC56D3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Post! More! Coords!

>> No.10175922
File: 454 KB, 1280x1280, tumblr_ootw20UvPU1r4jrfzo1_1280.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>not knowing how much VM has skyrocketed recently

The sailor JSKs would go for decent prices, and sadly the lacey doll OP is a bit more than my left tit since I'm an A cup.

But back to coords.

>> No.10175923
File: 880 KB, 1280x1920, tumblr_p3wggrn1M21ravthfo1_r4_1280.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10175924
File: 170 KB, 640x929, tumblr_ogsugeYOix1vr7cgdo1_640.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10175925
File: 276 KB, 600x900, tumblr_opg85oFb2D1qecu65o1_640.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10175926
File: 248 KB, 800x1067, tumblr_oty4vm1DrE1rex23do1_1280.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10175939
File: 741 KB, 1280x1707, 1500610514695.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.10175942
File: 95 KB, 960x960, 20258333_900745066757927_5871824271021422649_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10175947
File: 91 KB, 960x960, 1512921736244.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10175950
File: 203 KB, 720x960, 1491237103329.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10175953
File: 93 KB, 720x960, 17523559_365204250546724_1565987118110063744_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10175959
File: 127 KB, 576x1024, 22afead68844ed6be4cad9db6b4bad3121ce828d_hq.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10175999

She makes me want that bodyline dress so bad, yest at the same time she's told me that it's bad lol

>> No.10176003

Call the midwife kei, I love it extremely

>> No.10176005

I got two ops in that sailor line for $75 and $90.

>> No.10176007

are there any examples of toned down gothic? Is that possible?

>> No.10176033
File: 349 KB, 750x754, 99700A43-C57C-402C-A2D5-E8B6A57F9B71.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

I’d put obsixwi’s daily coords in that category. They definitely fit the thread description, anyway.

>> No.10176188

What dress is this? I am guessing AP but I couldn't find it on lolibrary for some reason.

>> No.10176361

Wow Im no lolita but after seeing this it makes me want to buy a outfit, prefer lolita this way much better

>> No.10176395

Tbh most lolitas I know wear it this way, you just don't see many pictures of it because it's boring to take a picture of yourself in a normal coord for no reason. Idk if it's just my comm but we only post pictures of our coords if we were at an event, kind of like a remembrance but also because we put extra effort in our look.

>> No.10176442

Is that dress Seraphim?

>> No.10176683

No, it's sheglit

>> No.10177559
File: 437 KB, 750x750, 2493300E-FFD4-42F0-AB52-9451C25C484E.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.10177616

Dream dress, is this Cordelia op from MM?

>> No.10177618

>dream dress
>isn't sure what dress it is

>> No.10177676

Are you the fat tranny who said you wanted this dress for your “kawaii lolita maid cosplay” in the crossplay thread

>> No.10178052

I'm asking because it would be neat to know if IW or some other brand put out a dress that is similar to the MM one I like. They're simple enough that I wouldn't mind one that is like it, rather than exactly it.

Literally what

>> No.10178214

The thing is, anon, that dress isn’t Cordelia and looks nothing like it.

>> No.10178224

I wanted to help you but I don't wear classic, so i reverse image searched it and the first thing that came up was an ageplay thing.
Time to die.

>> No.10178257
File: 44 KB, 300x400, c2c39a0d-909f-58ca-9ee1-02bed56d95fd.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Jesus Christ time to KMS. I got it confused with the name of another one I love, I meant Claudette. I was like "wtf is this anon on they are literally exactly the same" and it turns out I was the dumbass the whole time.

>> No.10178583

My point is if it's a dream dress you should know the name and every detail of what it looks like, unless you have some sort of mental illness that makes you forget. Don't call it a dream dress if you just kind of like it and would be as happy with a similar dress.

>> No.10182294
File: 15 KB, 250x333, Torchon Lace Ribbon JSK.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

IW's Torchon Lace Ribbon JSK

>> No.10182301

Who shat in your petticoats jfc anon.

>> No.10184015
File: 658 KB, 1280x1920, tumblr_op4gcz3OiN1tykkceo5_1280.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

this might just tiptoe on the edge of casual/not casual because of the stickers but whatever

>> No.10184016
File: 69 KB, 564x783, 20af0e15f1919df0584b637b0157bf33.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.10184021
File: 39 KB, 564x564, 847e83a9eb631ce976a24f31a5d12226.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10184022
File: 116 KB, 506x810, 15d5dac18b6ff651adfe67382b1c6433.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

A lot of old street snaps and magazine spreads show simple and toned down gothic coords

>> No.10184024
File: 760 KB, 579x772, aliceholic.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.10184027
File: 258 KB, 1280x1707, sheglit.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.10184030

Brand doesn’t always = lolita.

>> No.10184158

It's been awhile since Innocent World released any non lolita dresses (like the short skirts and cutsew OPs). Most of their releases are toned down but still gorgeous

>> No.10184163

Fun fact: Not all lolita coords look like Party City disasters. Try actually wearing the fashion like clothes rather than in yearly events, costume-chan.

>> No.10184258

This is my favorite thread. These types of coords are closest to what I wear and find inspiring

>> No.10184613

It's not just the stickers desu

>> No.10184614 [DELETED] 

99% of the time lolita brand = lolita

>> No.10184617

99% of the time lolita brand = lolita

>> No.10184667
File: 666 KB, 750x760, 2119B4B3-97FD-4B30-9FB3-2BBB6D7AEE37.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.10184726

AP sugary baby doll

>> No.10184834

No, not really. You can wear lolita pieces in non lolita coords, and lolita brands make non lolita shit as well.

>> No.10184839

Okay, but how is that relevant to this coord? >>10170278 It's clearly lolita.

>> No.10184845

looks more like general vintage fashion than lolita

>> No.10184867

Sorry you don't know what classic is.

>> No.10184914


Are you the same person? It seems like your use of short sentences, sarcastic extraneous words ("sorry"), and abrupt periods is distinctive. Why do you care so much? Why do you spend so much time on 4chan? Finally, why are you such a fucking bitch?

>> No.10184941
File: 1.73 MB, 2250x3000, C4D861C6-A4FB-4DF6-8630-D706C16132D3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Nayrt but why do you care so much/why are you “such a fucking bitch” about insisting that one of the oldest lolita substyles isn’t lolita? Many of the most iconic classic pieces look even more toned-down and “vintage” than that, like pic related. They’re still lolita. People who came to lolita through anime, cons etc. seem to have an exaggerated idea of what lolita looks like in the real world, which is why we have to have these kinds of threads.

>> No.10184966

I could not care less whether it's Lolita or not, gull was just being a snotty hoebag baka no need to be so mean ladies let's all love lain

>> No.10191518
File: 24 KB, 400x638, 6f86b13e461474608888439be144f790.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.10201269
File: 38 KB, 400x560, 8B9E6B5C-2F0B-4202-A6BE-C7A3512D3DCC.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

I like this but there is a lot of badness in general on. Lookbook.nu under the Classic Lolita tag.

>> No.10202436

what brand is this OP

>> No.10204167

This girl, everytime I look at her pictures I cannot unsee how that half whatever open mouth thing she does makes her teeth look rotten and just ugly.

>> No.10204212

I think it's VM?

Name (leave empty)
Comment (leave empty)
Password [?]Password used for file deletion.