Casual lolita thread

[Anonymous No.10118805]

I need new inspo. It doesn't have to be a brand new coord, but don't post that Misako pic from 100 years ago, we've all seen it.

Blouses not allowed.
Salopettes and cutsew dresses welcome. Just posting new casual releases you like is also fine.

[Anonymous No.10118806]

>>10118805

[Anonymous No.10118807]

>>10118806

[Anonymous No.10118811]

>>10118807

[Anonymous No.10118813]

>>10118811

[Anonymous No.10118814]

>>10118813

[Anonymous No.10118820]

>>10118814

[Anonymous No.10119391]

>>10118805
>new inspo
Too difficult

[Anonymous No.10119399]

>>10118811
I hate how long Putumayo's cutsews are, I bought one to wear like this but half the print gets cut off.

[Anonymous No.10119427]

>>10119391
Not sure how new these are but I tried to find a few new coords from CoF

[Anonymous No.10119430]

>>10119427

[Anonymous No.10119431]

>>10119430

[Anonymous No.10119432]

>>10119431
This is the best casual coord for me, I wish they'd release the whole series again.

[Anonymous No.10119433]

>>10119432

[Anonymous No.10119435]

>>10119433
I love cardigans over jsks to tone down pieces for casual wear

[Anonymous No.10119436]

>>10119435

[Anonymous No.10119437]

>>10119436
These are a little old but I love them

[Anonymous No.10119438]

>>10119437

[Anonymous No.10119449]

>>10119438

[Anonymous No.10119451]

>>10119449

[Anonymous No.10119488]

Requesting more pictures of coords that aren't just a skirt and a sweater or a skirt and a cutsew.

[Anonymous No.10119504]

>>10119488
Would you like to see JSKs with a sweater or JSKs with a cutsew?

[Anonymous No.10119505]

>>10119504

[Anonymous No.10119506]

>>10119505

[Anonymous No.10119507]

>>10119506

[Anonymous No.10119508]

>>10119507

[Anonymous No.10119515]

Do Japanese lolitas really consider this casual lolita or is it a mistake from Closet Child? https://twitter.com/ccyokohama/status/1091940802157174786?s=19

[Anonymous No.10119519]

>>10119515
Seems that there are at least some that do, when you look up カジュアルロリィタ there are also blogs recommending Secret Honey and Rosemarie Seoir for casual lolita. I think in Japan lolita is more about the aesthetic and intention than "the rules" so it depends on how you coord those dresses, how you identify your own style and which subculture you're in. That's why on cgl you have types that say "just because a lolita brand made it doesn't mean it's lolita", but the lolita brand itself just wanted to release a lolita mini-skirt/salopette/yukata. Or maybe they don't see it as "real lolita" but more like, "this is what a lolita wears when lazing around at home" and "this is the type of yukata a lolita wears"

[Anonymous No.10119632]

>>10119515
I consider it casual.

[Anonymous No.10119797]

I feel like the definition of "casual" is broad and unhelpful.

For example, theres >>10118814, an ETC/Leur Getter type coordinate which was considered Otome until recently, which usually has minimal or no petticoat, and different legwear and accessories.

Or theres coordinates like (>>10119432) or pic-related, wearing ambiguously lolita items released by lolita brands, like salopettes.

Theres (>>10119435) or (>>10119504) which seem like full lolita coordinates to me, just using knits or cardigans instead of a blouse. I don't see what makes this casual beside the lack of blouse.

Then there is (>>10119449) or (>>10118806) which are more the normal definition of casual lolita as defined during the daily lolita years, a skirt and cutsew or knit, combined with normie elements like sneakers or a normie t-shirt.

[Anonymous No.10119803]

>>10119797
For the sake of discussion, lets label these types as A through D.

This is a type A style casual lolita coordinate, what would formerly be called Otome Kei

[Anonymous No.10119806]

>>10119797
What's unhelpful about it? I think that makes it more fun. I love that lolita has so much variety.

[Anonymous No.10119809]

>>10119803
This is a type B style casual lolita coordinate, using items like short salopettes or mini skirts.

[Anonymous No.10119813]

>>10119806
it's unhelpful because what are people asking for when they say "casual"?

>>10119797
This would be "type c" or what i classically consider casual lolita. skirt + cutsew, minimal accessories everywhere else, practical shoes, practical uncomplicated hair.

[Anonymous No.10119814]

>>10119797
>>10119803
If you're going to try to make a specific definiton of what casual lolita has to look like, please stop. Just post cute casual coords, thank you.

[Anonymous No.10119817]

>>10119813
this is "type d" or what people are now considering casual lolita, just a full lolita coordinate without a blouse, using a knit or cardigan instead.

[Anonymous No.10119819]

>>10119814
that doesn't change the fact that nothing is casual about many of these coordinates

[Anonymous No.10119820]

>>10119813
Okay, I'm asking for type A to Z. I added some letters because I want to leave room for other things, and I'd also consider sack dresses quite casual depending on how you coord them.

[Anonymous No.10119822]

[Anonymous No.10119824]

[Anonymous No.10119826]

[Anonymous No.10119829]

[Anonymous No.10119831]

>>10119817
Okay sperglord, it's not like anyone's gonna listen to you. Just post pics and stop bossing people around, lmao. Casual = uncomplicated and comfortable while still using lolita items/keeping the lolita silhouette. That's literally it

[Anonymous No.10119833]

[Anonymous No.10119834]

>>10119831
you call me a sperglord yet im the one contributing to the thread currently. just pointing out that casual is a broad term that means almost nothing anymore.

[Anonymous No.10119835]

>>10119817
I normally see people call that toned-down lolita.

>>10119819
Which coords specifically? The way I see it, casual doesn't automatically mean ''minimal effort''. It can be a coord with a fancy print, many accessories and a casual top. It's okay if a style can look a lot of different ways. You don't need this discussion to figure out what OP asked for either, she specifically mentioned salopettes and cutsew dresses.

[Anonymous No.10119836]

>>10119817
This is casual now? Shit I guess I better tag all my pics on Instagram #casuallolita now

[Anonymous No.10119837]

[Anonymous No.10119841]

[Anonymous No.10119843]

[Anonymous No.10119845]

[Anonymous No.10119846]

>>10119843
oh come on how is this casual? this is very clearly a full summer coordinate.

[Anonymous No.10119848]

>>10119819
>>10119834
>It doesn't have to be a brand new coord, but don't post that Misako pic from 100 years ago, we've all seen it.
Great contribution of a Herajika coord that never gets posted in casual threads

>>10119824
>>10119826
These are cute, love it

>>10119843
Please tell me you didn't mean to post this

[Anonymous No.10119849]

[Anonymous No.10119853]

[Anonymous No.10119857]

[Anonymous No.10119861]

>>10119834
>vegetables can have all kinds of different shapes and colours, calling something a vegetable means almost nothing

[Anonymous No.10119865]

[Anonymous No.10119866]

[Anonymous No.10119870]

[Anonymous No.10119873]

[Anonymous No.10119875]

[Anonymous No.10119877]

Requesting official brand coords, preferably worn

[Anonymous No.10119879]

[Anonymous No.10119881]

>>10119877
for you

[Anonymous No.10119885]

>>10119881
fuck wait this was a mistake post.

[Anonymous No.10119886]

>>10119877
>>10119885

[Anonymous No.10119888]

>>10119886

[Anonymous No.10119891]

>>10119888

[Anonymous No.10119893]

>>10119886
Thank you!

[Anonymous No.10119895]

>>10119891

[Anonymous No.10119896]

>>10119895

[Anonymous No.10119898]

>>10119896

[Anonymous No.10119900]

>>10119898

[Anonymous No.10119901]

>>10119900

[Anonymous No.10119903]

[Anonymous No.10119905]

[Anonymous No.10119907]

[Anonymous No.10119910]

[Anonymous No.10119911]

[Anonymous No.10119912]

[Anonymous No.10119914]

[Anonymous No.10119915]

[Anonymous No.10119918]

[Anonymous No.10119921]

[Anonymous No.10119924]

[Anonymous No.10119925]

[Anonymous No.10119939]

[Anonymous No.10119942]

[Anonymous No.10119944]

[Anonymous No.10119946]

[Anonymous No.10119947]

[Anonymous No.10119959]

[Anonymous No.10119961]

[Anonymous No.10119966]

[Anonymous No.10119967]

[Anonymous No.10119976]

[Anonymous No.10119979]

[Anonymous No.10119980]

[Anonymous No.10119985]

[Anonymous No.10119987]

[Anonymous No.10119988]

[Anonymous No.10119989]

[Anonymous No.10119991]

[Anonymous No.10119993]

[Anonymous No.10119996]

[Anonymous No.10120000]

[Anonymous No.10120001]

[Anonymous No.10120004]

[Anonymous No.10120005]

[Anonymous No.10120010]

[Anonymous No.10120011]

[Anonymous No.10120015]

i love this, even though its not really lolita

[Anonymous No.10120017]

[Anonymous No.10120018]

[Anonymous No.10120019]

>>10120015
Then don't post it to the casual LOLITA thread stupid cunt

[Anonymous No.10120023]

[Anonymous No.10120026]

>>10120019
you are more than welcome to contribute anon! its hard doing this all by myself.

[Anonymous No.10120029]

>>10120026
I guess it would be hard when you're stupid

[Anonymous No.10120030]

another brand photo for >>10119877

[Anonymous No.10120031]

>>10120019
>>10120029
It's still using lolita items in a casual style so chill.

[Anonymous No.10120033]

>>10120029
you're wasting so much time being aggressive as opposed to just contributing.

[Anonymous No.10120035]

[Anonymous No.10120036]

[Anonymous No.10120039]

[Anonymous No.10120041]

>>10120031
That's not casual lolita though

>>10120033
And you're wasting space and oxygen

[Anonymous No.10120043]

[Anonymous No.10120044]

[Anonymous No.10120046]

[Anonymous No.10120047]

>>10120044
if you're going to spam dump can you please filter through your pics and post actual full coordinates?

[Anonymous No.10120048]

[Anonymous No.10120050]

>>10120047
I've posted a ton of full coordinates, a small handful of stock photos and flatlays aren't ruining anything.

[Anonymous No.10120051]

[Anonymous No.10120052]

>>10120050
I'm enjoying your dump anon. Please ignore the trolls. Where have you been finding all your pics?

[Anonymous No.10120054]

[Anonymous No.10120055]

>>10120052
I collect pics for inspiration in my spare time, I look all over tumblr, daily_lolita, on wear.jp, twitter, etc. I'm trying to avoid reposting pics I've found in other cgl threads since OP wanted more fresh content.

[Anonymous No.10120057]

[Anonymous No.10120058]

>>10120050
Posting stock photos is annoying and takes up an image limit space for the thread.

[Anonymous No.10120059]

[Anonymous No.10120062]

>>10120058
You may not get inspiration from those type of photos but me and others do. Your bitching is wasting space too.

[Anonymous No.10120065]

[Anonymous No.10120066]

[Anonymous No.10120067]

[Anonymous No.10120068]

>>10120026
you do know there's an image limit right?

[Anonymous No.10120069]

[Anonymous No.10120072]

[Anonymous No.10120073]

[Anonymous No.10120074]

[Anonymous No.10120075]

[Anonymous No.10120076]

[Anonymous No.10120077]

>>10120057
this is my most favorite coord ever. I always feel happier when I see it!

[Anonymous No.10120079]

[Anonymous No.10120080]

>>10119817
this and other coords like it I just considered like, lolita. not casual. It's a full coord.

I personally consider "casual" to be just that- literally lolita you can just throw on and be comfortable in. Not a coord you have to start putting on 2 hours early.

[Anonymous No.10120081]

[Anonymous No.10120082]

>>10120081
This is a really slow board could you please slow down and pick good images instead of spamming a bunch of low quality not-even-full-coord pics?

[Anonymous No.10120085]

>>10120082
oh my god you are never happy, are you?

[Anonymous No.10120087]

[Anonymous No.10120089]

[Anonymous No.10120090]

>>10120085
Maybe if you weren't spamming the thread with mediocre shit people wouldn't complain.

[Anonymous No.10120092]

[Anonymous No.10120094]

[Anonymous No.10120095]

[Anonymous No.10120098]

[Anonymous No.10120100]

[Anonymous No.10120102]

[Anonymous No.10120279]

>>10120102
I am happy you posted, there are a lot of coords I've never seen, but this also kills the thread

[Anonymous No.10120309]

>>10120279
That anon kept nitpicking the coords I was posting and the thread was almost at image limit so I stopped to give someone else a chance to finish.

[Anonymous No.10120396]

Im going to Japan anons! I need some inspo ideas. I know I will be walking a lot so my teaparties and maybe super cute sneakers? <<<I have never worn sneakers in my coords. help! I am so excited but dont want to look ita as a foreigner

[Anonymous No.10120399]

>>10120089
Is that a blouse? REEEEEE

[Anonymous No.10120403]

>>10120396
This thread is pretty close to the image limit, and there's already a lot of inspo here. If you need more specific help, maybe try the coord help thread?

[Anonymous No.10120405]

>>10120309
It's not like we can't just make a new thread. I enjoyed looking through your photos. Image dumps were common here.

[Anonymous No.10120406]

>>10120396
I wouldn't wear sneakers with your coords. But maybe that's just my taste. Something like pic related might work better depending on your wardrobe. But do not buy cheap ones online, you need to try them on and walk around before buying.

[Anonymous No.10120416]

>>10120396
Will you go in spring/summer? I would check out Liz Lisa. They usually have pink sneakers and sandals that are not too expensive. There are lots of replicas of them online btw but that kind of defeats the purpose because they'll be less comfortable. Pic related is from Axes Femme. Whatever shoes you wear, you could change the shoelaces with some ribbon.

>>10120405
I don't remember a time when it was common for one anon to dump over 100 images.

[Anonymous No.10120445]

>>10120087
This is the cutest shit ever

[Anonymous No.10120458]

>>10120058
Dude post your own images instead of harassing other people who are contributing. there's a million salty threads on here for you to plop down on

[Anonymous No.10120464]

>>10120399
A blouse with a skirt is a normal casual coordinate, especially if the blouse is on the looser side and untucked.

[Anonymous No.10120481]

>>10120464
No it's not. It's a normal lolita coord.

[Anonymous No.10120484]

>>10120481
>>10120464
Why can't it be both? Casual is about look and feel, not itemized pieces.

[Anonymous No.10120495]

>>10120484
Not sure if bait or retarded, but it has all aspects of a normal lolita coord. A coord doesn't have to be either OTT or casual. A basic lolita coord is not casual or OTT. There is literally nothing casual about >>10120089.

[Anonymous No.10120501]

>>10120464
>A blouse with a skirt is a normal casual coordinate
>there is nothing inbetween casual and OTT

[Anonymous No.10120504]

>>10120041
It’s not specifically the “casual lolita” substyle but it’s something many lolitas here could replicate to wear casually using their lolita items outside of a more formal coordinate and might be inspired by. I’m not the anon who posted it but it was still interesting to see. Just chill.

[Anonymous No.10120505]

>>10120504
This is a casual lolita thread, not a "what many lolitas would wear" thread. Either way it's dumb to call something casual just because it doesn't take much effort to wear or you don't consider it formal. It also wasn't interesting to see because it gets posted quite often.

[Anonymous No.10120506]

the whining in this thread....god /cgl/ has gone downhill with these brats, hasn't it? sure there's an image limit but she can just make another thread.
I'm surprised you idiots haven't figured out that casual is typically subjective. People have different casual styles for their life. It's not worth arguing about because of that.

[Anonymous No.10120509]

>>10120019
You ok mate?

[Anonymous No.10120511]

>>10120505
“Could.” Not would. Some people might still consider it casual lolita anyway so whatever anon. Glad you love being angry at nothing.

[Anonymous No.10120512]

>>10120506
You've obviously never been in casual lolita threads. There are always people posting toned-down coords and then others arguing it's not casual. Normally there are also people arguing that it's not even recognisable as lolita because it looks too toned-down.

[Anonymous No.10120515]

>>10120504
>>10120511
>It’s not specifically the “casual lolita” substyle
OP said no blouses and this is obviously for the "substyle" casual lolita. Nobody cares what your personal opinion is on formal and casual wear. You're a weirdo if you wear a blouse to laze around at home but whatever.

[Anonymous No.10120523]

>>10120512
I don't go on cgl much anymore because, like you said, typically the threads are all the same. People really like arguing about the same shit over and over again. It's subjective, people need to figure it out and stop wasting their time.

[Anonymous No.10120524]

>10120504
>>10120511
>It’s not specifically the “casual lolita” substyle
OP said no blouses and this thread is obviously for the "substyle" casual lolita. Nobody cares what your personal opinion is on formal and casual wear. You're a weirdo if you wear a blouse to laze around at home but whatever.

[Anonymous No.10120526]

>>10120504
>>10120511
>It’s not specifically the “casual lolita” substyle
OP said no blouses and this thread is obviously for the "substyle" casual lolita. Nobody cares what your personal opinion is on formal and casual wear. You're a weirdo if you wear a blouse to laze around at home but whatever.

[Anonymous No.10120531]

>>10120523
>It's subjective, anything can be lolita if you believe in it

[Anonymous No.10120534]

>>10120495
I never said that. The way she styled it looks like casual wear to me. Call it smart casual if you really want to.

[Anonymous No.10120555]

>>10120531
nice strawman. you sure got me.

[Anonymous No.10120565]

>>10120534
I call it lolita. Also please read >>10118805

[Anonymous No.10120593]

>>10120495
Casual is subjective and that's why it's hard to just say theres one specific casual look.

To me >>10120089 is casual for a number of reasons
>skirt + blouse combo where the blouse is loose and not tucked in
>sensible purse and not a novelty bag
>overall simple hair and makeup, despite having a lot of jewelry, its not particularly heavy jewelry

Generally speaking, a skirt and blouse will usually always look more casual, its harder to dress up a skirt, and its harder to dress down an OP.

I'm the one who posted it and it's my fault, I missed out on the OP saying no blouses, my mistake, apologies to OP.

Anyway, no blouses isn't enough to be casual, because on no planet are >>10119504 or >>10119435 casual.

[Anonymous No.10120595]

[Anonymous No.10120599]

[Anonymous No.10120601]

[Anonymous No.10120604]

[Anonymous No.10120605]

[Anonymous No.10120607]

[Anonymous No.10120609]

[Anonymous No.10120610]

[Anonymous No.10120611]

and with this i top off the thread.

[Anonymous No.10120614]

>>10120593
It's not really subjective just like OTT is not really subjective. Otherwise I could argue >>10120089 is OTT, because to me, that's a big amount of accessories and it has a busy print I normally don't wear. Does that mean I should post it in the OTT thread? No, I use common sense and I know in general, lolitas consider casual lolita to be when you mix casual pieces of clothing with lolita.

[Anonymous No.10120616]

>>10120605
Some people will get upset at this because of the tank top, but i can't get over how cute this is.

[Anonymous No.10120617]

>>10120611
Are you still salty nobody wanted to discuss style A, B, C with you?

[Anonymous No.10120619]

>>10120614
it is subjective. please read >>10119797. If Casual wasn't so subjective thent there never would have beena any confusion about otome kei, which most westerner use to label just a form of casual lolita.

and OTT is very subjective now too. Some people consider OTT to be wearing a full AP set. Some people consider OTT to be the same as Deco-lolita. Some people think wearing a colored wig makes it automatically OTT. For some people only the most ostentatious, angel wing, costume-y coordinates are OTT.

[Anonymous No.10120620]

>>10120617
i wasn't trying to open a discussion, i was just making a point that its clear that casual means different things to different people.

[Anonymous No.10120621]

>>10120619
It may feel subjective to ignorant people but it's not subjective to anyone in this thread besides you

[Anonymous No.10120623]

>>10120619
Please read >>10119814 >>10119806

[Anonymous No.10120624]

>>10119797
It's people like you, obsessed with making rules, that ruin streetstyles

>>10120405
She obviously just did it to end this thread

[Anonymous No.10120625]

>>10120623
me
>casual lolita means a lot of different things to different people

you
>casual lolita only means ONE THING

[Anonymous No.10120627]

>>10120624
yes why should be have guidelines or rules! everythings made up and the fashion doesn't matter, lets just call everything lolita then.

casual lolita doesn't really exist as a term or definite substyle anyway, theres no brands dedicated to "casual lolita", theres only a handful of coordinates until the "casual lolita" or "Casuloli" tags on wear.jp, its just not a term really used a lot in japan, so nitpicking at it isn't going to ruin any steetstyle, don't worry.

[Anonymous No.10120629]

>>10120625
Please use your brains. The only people who think normal lolita coords with a blouse are "casual lolita" are the types who are so used to seeing OTT they started bitching fanny rosie is not a lolita.

[Anonymous No.10120630]

>>10120624
She didn't make rules, she simply asked for a clearer definition. Please keep your sperging to the unpopular opinion thread.

[Anonymous No.10120631]

>>10120627
Okay so what makes a blouse casual to you? Do you normally wear one at home in your sweatpants?

[Anonymous No.10120632]

>>10120629
I'm not saying blouses are always casual lolita, but blouses can definitely be casual, depending on how they are worn, it'll just be a little harder to do so, just like it's harder to wear an OP in a casual way, but nothing is impossible. >>10120069 is wearing a blouse but her simple shoes and legwear, lack of major head accessory makes the coordinate casual.

[Anonymous No.10120633]

>>10120631
I don't normally wear a blouse at home in sweatpants. I don't wear skirts, a cutsew, petticoat or a cardigan at home either, does that mean those aren't casual now? Casual lolita usually means casual by LOLITA standards. Some people want casual lolita to be casual by NORMIE standards. It depends on the person. My normal lolita style is more on the OTT side, so my "casual" is a lot different from someone elses whose daily style is more toned down.

[Anonymous No.10120635]

>>10120633
You think like a conlita. Lolita isn't something that exists completely outside the realm of normal understanding of casual and formal clothing items. Lolita is not casual. Wearing the most basic lolita coord still isn't casual.

[Anonymous No.10120638]

>>10120635
That is literally exactly what I'm saying, that some people see casual lolita as casual by normie standards, and some people see casual lolita as casual by lolita standards. It depends on the person.

[Anonymous No.10120641]

I always wear OTT so imo pic related is casual lolita. Oh wait I can't post pics anymore because some salt mine killed the thread. Probably this idiot >>10119488 had an anger attack because people didn't fulfill her request the way she expected.

[Anonymous No.10120642]

me wearing casual lolita, only 2 accessories so it totally counts http://www.flickr.com/photos/herajika/6957160341/

[Anonymous No.10120643]

>>10119488
>>>10119488
>No skirt and sweater coords
>no skirt and cutsew coords
>OP also said no blouse coords

OP if you just wanted a sack and cutsew dress thread then just say so specifically

[Anonymous No.10120644]

>>10120642
My god you're such an asshole. Surprise, casual lolita depends on the coordinate and print! What point are you trying to make?

[Anonymous No.10120646]

>>10120644
I'm just agreeing with the person who posted over 100 coords to proof that anything can be casual lolita

>>10120643
What makes you think OP made that request?

[Anonymous No.10120649]

>>10120646
So besides >>10120089 what coordinates here aren't casual to you? Since obviously someone died and made you lord of the lolitas.

[Anonymous No.10120650]

Our casual lolita is in serious trouble. I mean, we've had a lot of casual lolita threads here that were, you know, not really good, all reposts, no action. We don't have victories anymore. We used to have victories, but we don't have them anymore, when was the last time anyone saw a good casual lolita thread? Let me tell you, posting normal lolita coords is a very, very big problem, and you know, really, for us as a community. They sent their normal lolita coords to a casual lolita thread, illegally, they beat us all the time, all the time. They bring in any coord, they bring in crime, that is so bad. They're sending us, probably, probably, not the right coords. Because they do a thing like making OTT the new normal. They knowingly, you know, don't tell the truth. And They're gonna, they want to raise customs. One of the things with the, with our Japanese lolitas--and I have many friends there, I do business with Japan--but, that, they wear things like, they wear Fi.n.t, Emikyu, Milk, and say it's casual lolita. They say カジュアルロリィタ. And, you know, nobody, nobody speaks up about that. Misako calls it, she calls it soft lolita, but she is, really, she's a known liar. She's said half of us are fatty-chans. We are going to take back kajurori, and it's going to be great. This thread will decide wether we are ruled by a corrupt OTT class, or we are ruled by, you know, people. The forgotten men and women of this fashion. But I don't care about that stuff anymore. It's like small potatoes, right. I, really, have great optimism for the future of casual lolita. And JOBS. Oh boy.

[Anonymous No.10120657]

>>10120646
I think she means the poster of >>10119488, not >>10118805

[Anonymous No.10120658]

>>10120638
>some people see casual lolita as casual by lolita standards
If a full coord with an all-over print, blouse, several hair accessories and several necklaces is casual lolita by their subjective standards, they're conlitas and I don't need their opinion

[Anonymous No.10120659]

>>10120658
>everyone different than me is a conlita!!!!!

[Anonymous No.10120660]

>>10120643
nice thread idea!

[Anonymous No.10120711]

>>10120058
>imagine thinking that have any control over what other people post
why don't you post what you want to see, then, instead of being salty about it?

[Anonymous No.10120715]

>>10120711
Nayrt but you can't post any more images. I love seeing stock photos desu.

[Anonymous No.10120718]

>>10120650
Kek, bravo anon

[Anonymous No.10120720]

>>10120659
Can you give an example of what you think is a non-OTT, non-casual lolita coord?

[Anonymous No.10120722]

>>10120082
>>10120090
>stop liking what i don't like!
kek, you are so full of yourself.

jsyk, i enjoyed the dump anon. fuck that other salty cunt.

[Anonymous No.10120724]

>>10120658
>and I don't need their opinion
Then maybe you should just make a blog post or circlejrk group instead of posting on a website for anonymous discussion.

[Anonymous No.10120727]

>>10120638
>>10120724
Next time we'll make sure to specify it's a thread for casual lolita by normal standards, not conlita standards

[Anonymous No.10120731]

>>10120727
You will still have people who disagree with you and your definition of casual. Screaming conlita whenever something doesn't fit your taste won't change that.

[Anonymous No.10120742]

>>10120731
I didn't scream it whenever, that wasn't me anyway, but almost all coords in this thread are totally fine. The argument is just about >>10120089 lol

[Anonymous No.10120751]

>>10120720
these >>10119431, >>10119435, >>10119504,>>10119843 all look like normal, full lolita coordinates to me.

[Anonymous No.10120754]

>>10120751
What would >>10119431 have to change to make it casual lolita?

[Anonymous No.10120761]

>>10120650

lel

[Anonymous No.10120769]

>>10120754
simpler hair and legwear? it just doesn't read as casual to me, its a really bold cutsew.

[Anonymous No.10120778]

>>10119632
Mini skirt lenght tho.

[Anonymous No.10121330]

>>10120416
Thank you anons! yea Im a size 25.5 so Liz Lisa can be a hit or miss. I own some boots from them that fit but I have some heels that dont. I love those Axes Femme shoes!!

[Anonymous No.10121696]

>>10121330
You might like this brand anon. The largest size they have is 25.5.
>http://mayla.jp

[Anonymous No.10126279]

>>10121696
Nayrt but thanks

[Anonymous No.10126345]

>>10120650
underrated post

[Anonymous No.10135535]

>>10120605
what year was this taken

[Anonymous No.10135537]

>>10119435
whats that JSK? I can't even make out the pattern

[Anonymous No.10135557]

>>10135537
Angelic Pretty Promenade de Paris