[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/cgl/ - Cosplay & EGL


View post   

File: 230 KB, 1395x1743, FB_IMG_1541607507490.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10028970 No.10028970 [Reply] [Original]

Previous thread:>>10025769
These degenerates need to leave the fashion alone.

>> No.10028974

>>10028970
Damn, you beat me to it anon.

>> No.10028975

>>10028970
That was fast as fuck, she only posted this photo 23 minutes ago.

>> No.10028976
File: 529 KB, 750x1001, DD8B8656-6E60-45A8-AC10-CA95F4896958.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10028976

>> No.10028977

>>10028975
Yep. Hope she enjoys her first post to CoF being the ita thread cover here.

>> No.10028980

literally looks like foot fetish porn, why are they so big???

>> No.10028983

>>10028970
Is this a guy? look at the size of the feet and hands, the hairy arms, and how flat the chest is. yikes

>> No.10028986

>>10028980
Did you see her comment? >toddler telekinesis
This is definitely a fetish to her. I'm sure the foot stuff is on purpose

>> No.10028989

>>10028970
I would be digging it if it wasn't for how fetishy it looks. And those socks. And lack of accessories on her arms/hands
Off course everyone is praising her, shows to show how COF is filled with tasteless plebs that'll yell "QUEEN" at anything once again

>> No.10028991

>>10028986
Gross af.

>> No.10028992
File: 72 KB, 600x600, 45505029_999672123550162_3766729070696464384_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10028992

Why on earth would you use this as the photo of your sales post?

>> No.10028993
File: 60 KB, 1024x794, Dq8bHAbWsAAt0jK.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10028993

>>10028976

>> No.10028998
File: 131 KB, 749x1057, DB65C0B2-0D05-4020-897D-2EF2559D643C.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10028998

>>10028986

>> No.10028999

>>10028989
You immediately get banned in the group if you say anything negative that isn't concrit, anon.

>> No.10029002

>>10028999
No you don’t, you guys are just too autistic to post on fb.

>> No.10029006

>>10028970
i'm all for weird shit like this in lolita but it just looks fetish-y and the miku pillow is a no from me chief

>> No.10029007

>>10028998
What does it mean?

>> No.10029010

>>10028970
Has this been removed or something? I was trying to find it to cringe at comments but I didn't see it.
Is it gone or am I just that retarded?

>> No.10029012
File: 35 KB, 215x264, 20181107_121743.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10029012

>>10028970
Someone save him

>> No.10029013

>>10029010
Its gone

>> No.10029029

>>10028992
I hate when people use self shots in a salespost in general, but gosh is this frumpy

>> No.10029038

>>10029013
Did s/he bawwlete that fast??
>>10028983
That’s what I was thinking.

>> No.10029048

>>10029038
Oh yeah she did delete it a few minutes after this thread appeared. She either saw it or got concrit (or realized it looked creepy and not in the aesthetic way) ? I wonder

>> No.10029063

>>10029048
Someone told her to stop when she brought up the toddler telekinesis shit then she deleted.

>> No.10029096

>>10029063
what the hell was toddler telekinesis even supposed to mean?

>> No.10029114 [DELETED] 

>>10029096
Beats me. Shame because I'd like the coord and setting if she had better socks and the photo didn't give off such a fetishy vibe.

>> No.10029122

>>10029096
She's making the wood cubes float with her toddler telekinesis

>> No.10029131

>>10028970
Everyone is saying "she" but I'm thinking this is a sissy.
Those are some very masculine hands/feet and the makeup looks almost like drag makeup.
That combined with the weird fetish overtone just raise some red flags for me.

>> No.10029133

>>10029131
Didnt see >>10028983 until after I posted mine oops.

>> No.10029135
File: 100 KB, 462x586, IMG_0739.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10029135

>>10028970
IS this the same girl?

>> No.10029136

>>10029122
....they were supposed to be floating?

>> No.10029140

>>10029135
What even this supposed to look like

>> No.10029144

>>10029122
god i didn’t even notice those poorly shooped blocks with the clusterfuck of everything else going on

>> No.10029159

>>10028970
ew what the everloving fuck

>> No.10029166

>>10028976
This isn't worthy of being in the ita thread because the girl isn't trying to be lolita. It's this weird Japanese little-girl fetish where the girls are small enough to fit into children's brands like mezzo piano and do sexual things.
The guy posting it is just some creep tagging his shit as lolita, it's not actually trying to be lolita.

>> No.10029176

>>10028970
It's pretty bad when one of the least disturbing things in the pic is the dakimakura.

>> No.10029193

>>10029122

She made them invisible in the reflection too.

>> No.10029195

>>10028970
Does she have a club foot Jesus fuck what’s wrong with her legs/feet?

>> No.10029215

>>10029144
>>10029193
they don't look shooped, i think she threw them into the air and took the picture before they landed. the photo is cropped so the part of the mirror they would show up in isn't visible

>> No.10029255

>>10029135
i kinda like this besides the headthing and shoes. Those two things really hurt the outfit though. I like her room.

>> No.10029256

>>10028992
shoes
on
the
bed

>> No.10029290
File: 48 KB, 220x249, 220px-Toadette_-_Mario_Party_10.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10029290

>>10028992
The way she wears her beret makes her look like Toadette

>> No.10029295

>>10029135
My poor dream dress deserves better than this :(

>> No.10029318
File: 274 KB, 750x901, 5B6D4925-6A67-43D7-B279-5F7065733C1C.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10029318

>> No.10029319
File: 1.07 MB, 750x932, 9D1B7159-7EEB-4551-9173-E8B64D412E45.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10029319

>>10029318

>> No.10029322

>>10029319
Oh, man....
>no accessories
>shiny fabric
>very poor construction
>weird pleated things on bodice
>baggy tights (leggings?)
>everything's wrinkled

As a seamstress, this physically hurts me.

>> No.10029360

>>10028970
How every AP print looks to me

>> No.10029403

>>10029318
Okay, but she looks like an alternative cutie I can take to the club and who will want to take me to concerts. Where can I get her number?

>> No.10029412

>>10029403
Yikes... "alternative" my ass. looks like one of the tumblr people with piercings because they think it's being a rebel.

>> No.10029422

>>10029412
Sure hun. Talk to me when you know how I can find her. I'm gonna talk with her about her daddy issues and bump uglies to some dark shit. You wait.

>> No.10029463

>>10029403
hot people can be ita and people will defend it because they're braindead, more at 11

>> No.10029485

>>10029403
You have really low standards anon.

>> No.10029487

>>10029403
anon there are well dressed lolitas who like clubbing and concerts
>t. a moshing lolita

>> No.10029543
File: 630 KB, 750x926, D1C91EB6-01BF-4678-A3BB-4C17A870671B.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10029543

>>10029135
i love her aesthetic but she has the weirdest fucking poses that don’t suit her style

>> No.10029563

>>10029166
I was going to say, Mezzo Piano stuff is pretty small, so that makes this shit even weirder. Adult kawaii fashions exist, there’s no excuse except being a fetishist.
>>10029135
>>10029543
Okay, what in the fucking world though. Is this really the same person as OP? They really look manly in the last one...

>> No.10029605

>>10029563
it's not the same person

>> No.10029608
File: 339 KB, 1487x2048, 45496767_10156181156818409_5926327859365806080_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10029608

>> No.10029609
File: 59 KB, 720x960, 45469969_10217549631998200_209989390712176640_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10029609

>> No.10029610

>>10028970
>>10029135
>>10029543
Oh look. A newer, whiter, less political but more ddlg-looking commie-chan.

>> No.10029615

>>10029608
Not ita, just casual
>>10029609
Nitpick

>> No.10029616

>>10029610
she's not the same person as the op pic you dunce

>> No.10029645

>>10029608
This is just casual lolita. Sneakers don't immediately make a coord ita, but pink or purple sneakers would have been better since the holo silver sneaks match a whole lotta nothin else in her coord.

>>10029609
Better legwear could have been used, but this isn't ita. Coming from someone who hates religious themed shit.

Are we not allowed to have nitpick threads anymore or something?

>> No.10029654

>>10029608
Not ita.

Come on guys where are the trainwreck itas?

>> No.10029657
File: 186 KB, 1080x1080, 1541678782333.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10029657

>> No.10029658
File: 162 KB, 1080x1080, 1541678941271.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10029658

>> No.10029659
File: 152 KB, 1080x1080, 1541678974536.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10029659

>> No.10029666

>>10029657
>>10029658
>>10029659
Oh look raging feminist expansion pack.

>> No.10029671
File: 595 KB, 750x910, 629967F4-0285-45E9-876F-4CB467C05AEB.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10029671

>>10029659

>> No.10029672

>>10029671
shooped face says mid to late 20s, chest/arms say late 30s to early 40s

>> No.10029674
File: 591 KB, 750x920, CF4C9FB7-8EA6-47E5-838B-2EA7CCA99EC6.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10029674

>>10029671

>> No.10029693

>>10029608
This isn't ita at all, get out of here with this vendetta shit, post real trash

>> No.10029694

>>10029674
this is love live sunshine cosplay

>> No.10029769

>>10029543
i actually like this one, obviously not lolita, but i like it. What's her @?

>> No.10029771

>>10029645
I havent seen a nitpick thread in a long time, they need to come back.

>> No.10029803
File: 544 KB, 750x909, 430F31DD-0496-4DB1-9B17-621D81AD025A.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10029803

>> No.10029817

>>10029803
Wasn't this posted by Paradiso?

>> No.10029829

>>10029608
This isn't really ita, more just supreme nitpick, but every time I see her ratty-ass hair and shitty makeup my blood pressure spikes and I am filled with the same rage I guess vendetta-chans are

>> No.10029837

>>10029803
yes

>> No.10029856

>>10029166
>>10029563
You guys mean Jojifuku, it's an actual jfash even promoted by Kera, not a fetish thing.
http://kerastyle.jp/fashion/687

>> No.10029858

>>10029856
That's pretty creepy. If you try to dress like a child you probably have something wrong with you anon.

>> No.10029872

>>10029858
I think decora is kind of similar, it is actually children fashion to the extreme

>> No.10029875

>>10029872
Wat? Decora just uses layers of cute patterned clothes and tons of cute accessories, how is it children's fashion?

>> No.10029878

>>10029872
No anon, it's totally different. Decora is about layering tons of stuff (patterns,accessories,...). It might have childlike elements to it (some accessories come from kid stores etc) but the goal isn't to look like a child at all. As some decora girl once said it's more about wearing everything you love at once

>> No.10029888

>>10029817
Probably. It is a costume party.

>> No.10029889

>>10029856
Those pictures on that dude's accounts are not Jojifuku.. it's fetish shit.
There's a difference between the little girl fashion trend and little girl fetishes...
The girls are literally lifting up their skirts and showing their panties and their asses and shit.

>> No.10029892

>>10029858
It depends on the age of who’s wearing it imo. A 30 year old would be really creepy but a 15 year old not as much. Normies think most jfashion is dressing like a kid anyway so might as well wear one of those kindergarten bucket hats.

>> No.10029930

>>10029892
Yeah,you make a point. It's normal for a young girl in her teenage years to still feel like a kid desu so i wouldn't care because i was the same myself. But once you're in your late teens/twenties it gets creepy in a "you look legit unhinged" way.
Heh,not really,90% of them think we're trying to be princesses from my experience. Or they see it as "playing dressup" but not dressing like little girls. I did get one remark like that once (from my own dad who's a retard anyway) and i told him to give me an example of an actual little girl dressing like that,out of "princess costumes". He just mumbled.

>> No.10029931
File: 32 KB, 621x350, B9C241EC-E5A4-440F-9438-8B2E356BFFF1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10029931

>>10029674
yeah this is s yohane Cosplay

>> No.10029934

>>10029769
@rocococeane

>> No.10029935

>>10029608
Why wear a casual coord if you're just gonna pile that much makeup on your face?

>> No.10029942

>>10029931
>tfw yohane is an ita

>> No.10029966

>>10029889
That pic is from the official jojifuku account tho, hence the room being the same from the Kera article.

>> No.10029967

>>10029934
>rocococeane
thank you so much, genuinely love her non-lolita outfits

>> No.10029970

>>10029930
my grandmother straight up said in front of me to my dad "she dresses up like a little girl because she feels bad about ripping up all of her nice sunday dresses!!" and i snorted loudly

>> No.10029972

>>10029892
Mezzo Piano makes clothes for girls up to age 16, that doesn't really count as small child and that size will fit most adults too.

>> No.10030096
File: 4 KB, 84x69, 978582DA-E9B0-4A9B-9C54-C6063A76E6B2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10030096

>>10029608
It’s messy but passable casual if you just block out your face. It isn’t even a matter that it’s obviously heavy, it’s that those eyes and brows don’t suit her (or the look) at all. I’d be super curious to see what she looks like with softer makeup.

>>10029658
>putting a border that literally has ruffles drawn in
>no actual ruffles or poof

>>10029803

>> No.10030100

>>10029608
Honestly if she wore tights instead of leggings and not those holo sneakers I'd think it was pretty good

>> No.10030233

>>10029657
is this a dude? mustache, huge eyebrows, big nose, man stance, complete lack of self-awareness, no boobs

>> No.10030235

>>10029672
Face looks mid 30s or so to me.

>> No.10030391
File: 113 KB, 960x960, 45720698_2140950819289084_2470184924863266816_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10030391

>> No.10030393

>>10029856
Jojifuku IS fetish. The stuff Kera promoted didn't show it, but the genre in general is fetish as hell. I mean, people posting panty shots in kids clothing are common in JF and it's disgusting.

>> No.10030395

>>10028970
Umm besides the socks this is actually a really cute coord

>> No.10030405
File: 17 KB, 250x356, Mr_Bean_face.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10030405

>>10029803
the one on the right looks like mr bean

>> No.10030418
File: 675 KB, 750x872, EB7A2DD3-CCDF-47B3-A13D-FA64F515780E.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10030418

>> No.10030437

>>10030418
Could someone tell itas posing like this does NOT make them look elegant

>> No.10030496

>>10030418
oof I hate this guy, he’s invited me to like his “lolita” page like 6 times. He has been wearing that ratchet ass wig with untrimmed bangs for like 5 years

>> No.10030502

>>10030496
Ewwwwwwww

>> No.10030618

>>10028970
When your white socks are both cheap nylons and dirty as fuck that are already two reasons too much to not wear them on photos.

That hime cut looks super akward tho. Like, the short side things are too short, as if the hair was cut, then the person was suddenly enlarged but the hair didn't grot with it. Hime cut with no bangs and such a short side things is a bad idea.

>>10029131
not to forget the hairy arms. Who shaves their legs this smoothly but has hairy underarms like that?

>> No.10030622

>>10030391
Came here for this. The caption didn't make it better:
>Crochet Lolita. Randomly stumbled across it. Seems like this person is the only one though. I actually like it, especially how she included the wrist cuffs and the headdress. What are your thoughts? Do you think it could catch on?

>Source: https://mikumarmalade.com/…/orangesicle-crochet-lolita-dre…/

>Note: Please if you don't like it, don't bash. You can disagree without getting nasty.

Let's be glad this person is the only one, and take a moment of silence for your ita taste of liking this, then another for all the positiveness in the comments saying this was amazing. Then a bit of respect for those telling in their face it looks like shit even when it took a lot of work. "Crochet lolita" isn't a style, and please, don't make this a thing.

And yes, we'll bash. You just noted that because you know it's shit and didn't want to get your snowflake feelings hurt.

>> No.10030623

>>10030437
he doesn't even do the bow right...

>> No.10030630

>>10029608
Tumbler Fag. I cant stand this girl. She just looks like shes trailer trash

>> No.10030649

>>10030393
Agreed. It’s just Japan’s take on ageplay.

>> No.10030656
File: 644 KB, 1280x1003, 34475175752_6f02772896_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10030656

>>10028970
terrible legwear and no footwear are nitpicks.
this coord and photo are actually fire. I don't get anything sexual from this. reminds me of pic related kind of photo shoots. this is the weird stuff we need a return of.

Also, it speaks to me because I have a giant bed that I don't share with no one but my pillows and my stuffed animals. the reflection plays up the Solitary Lolita Life™. Very Momoko.

>> No.10030666

>>10030656
Do you also comment on your toddler superpowers?

>> No.10030678

>>10030391
This was posted to an ita thread many moons ago and she was ripped apart back then. Everything is bad: the color, the design, the fact of no blouse, the whole crochet concept. All bad.

>> No.10030707

What makes it bad isn't the crochet, if this was made of fabric it would still look bad.
Such a pity she spent all those hours crocheting such a bad pattern.
Still, I would like to see crochet lolita done right, with nice design choices and well fitting crochet dress.

>> No.10030725

>>10029609
If she fixes the socks this should be alright

>> No.10030732
File: 821 KB, 750x924, FC2A5291-16D2-4DB3-AC80-91E06922C90E.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10030732

>> No.10030771

>>10030732
Dress is such a poor choice, someone get this poor girl a plain black IW dress. They aren't even expensive for IW White

>> No.10030773

>>10030771

a plain black IW dress doesn't have pictures of Pokemon on it though.

>> No.10030791
File: 552 KB, 1536x2128, 3C7DFF8B-CD62-44AE-B710-CDDCB2787411.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10030791

>> No.10030803

>>10030791
I thought this was the new add for Paradiso

>> No.10030818

>>10030732
Oh no

>> No.10030844
File: 419 KB, 2048x2128, 4FE5083D-BF6C-47F6-A8F7-D264DDAE4236.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10030844

>> No.10030866

>>10030773
Oh, I didn't even see that until you mentioned it. I wondered why anyone would wear such an awful dress.

Yeah there's literally no saving that dress, I don't think it's possible to coord with that clashing bodice and awful cut

>> No.10030869

>>10030418
>>10030437
>>10030496
>>10030502
>>10030623
his facebook page is TGRLolitaFashion

>> No.10030883

>>10030803
Beat me to it, anon.

>> No.10030890

>>10029608
Why do her nostrils always look like theyre held open with invisible corks?

>> No.10030899

>>10030732
Chiat I can’t believe this is Axes femme. Usually their shit is pretty cute. I’d love take it apart and sew it onto a cuter bodice for some kawaii casual wear.

>> No.10030970

>>10030869
Literally no one asked

>> No.10031021
File: 187 KB, 1080x1349, 1541841071423.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10031021

Why not wear three pairs of wristcufs all at once

>> No.10031027

>>10031021
Oh come on. That's a bit weird, but in no way is the outfit ita.

>> No.10031028

>>10030391
It's technically impressive - it must have taken ages. It's also hideous. Put your crochet skills into something like a cardigan or a small clutch bag.

>> No.10031037

>>10031027
I mean being a pedophile apologist is pretty ita

>> No.10031042

>>10028970
After owning Toy Fantasy, I never understood why anyone liked Toy Parade better. Then I finally got Toy Parade and realized it had full back-shirring. Now I feel like only fatties and itas wear Toy Parade.

>> No.10031072

>>10031037
No, that's not ita. That's a crime, horrendous and dangerous, but not ita.

>> No.10031090

>>10030391
Was coming here for this. One of the first comments got it right, looks like those dresses they put on toilet rolls dolls. Not exactly a good look.

>> No.10031132
File: 615 KB, 750x936, BF66845B-2990-4DCA-8C2B-66F38F6E8B74.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10031132

>> No.10031137

>>10031132
Oof, that beret

>> No.10031144

>>10031021
Dang did she gain weight?

>> No.10031195

>>10030844
You know she had to do it to em

>> No.10031200

>>10029608
The skirt is too cute for words, though. Sauce?

>> No.10031219

>>10031132
Her whole account is full of terrible coords. Like i have yet to find a single good one

>> No.10031225

>>10031042
Toy Fantasy is ugly and tacky, the stripes and belts make it look like taobao shit. The black colorway is the worst offender, with the white being a close second, and everyone who wears it looks like a hot mess.

>> No.10031248

>>10031021
>>10031037
I hate to ask, but who is this (is she efamous? I don’t think I’ve ever seen her before actually..) and why is she a pedo apologist?

>> No.10031273

>>10031248
CathyCat

>> No.10031278

>>10031225
By belt do you mean the heart buckle on the waist? Because none of the dresses have a true "belt." I'm sad you can't embrace the joy of Toy Fantasy. To me it's one of the best sweet prints. But I agree that the black colorway is gross, and honestly only the JSK is cute.

>> No.10031285

>>10031278
That anon is just salty, toy fantasy is one of my favorite prints too. The white colorway is the best

>> No.10031289
File: 517 KB, 750x932, D82A5B82-9CEB-457C-AF67-09DA465E7582.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10031289

> There was a costume contest a few weeks back so I decided to break out my #sweetlolita outfit

>> No.10031293

>>10031200
Metamorphose's Bubble Bath

>> No.10031294
File: 855 KB, 1535x2048, 97C5B17A-231A-4130-A3C2-BFC013F6EF96.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10031294

That weird age player is back again

>> No.10031296

>>10031285
The white colorway is also my favorite and seems much rarer than others. Previous anon is not #blessed enough to own it and probably butthurt as you said.

>>10031289
Not sweet. Not lolita.

>> No.10031299

>>10031294
Toddler-chan is at it again

>> No.10031301

>>10031219
Most long-time, legitimate itas (not just confused newbies or fetishists who don't care about the fashion in the first place) tend to be that way.

>> No.10031302

>>10031293
Thanks!

>> No.10031313

>>10031219
It's that same girl who posted the adidas shirt casual "lolita" that everyone fawned over

>> No.10031412
File: 182 KB, 746x735, 9EE77ADD-CCEE-48B1-A164-6EDF0C63A8CD.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10031412

ngl this is better than how she usually looks but still bad overall. Everything looks like it’s made of cheap bedsheet fabric...

>> No.10031417

>>10029608
Cute casual sweet like this makes me wish I was into pastels, but I only look super awkward in it because colors have never been my thing no matter how much I've tried

>> No.10031438

>>10031417
Well, I don't think that ita is wearing "cute casual sweet" but I feel the same. colors aren't really my thing. I've been trying to branch out recently, but really the only colors I like on myself are black and white.

>> No.10031441
File: 47 KB, 360x420, IMG_9816.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10031441

>>10031200
the OP is cuter in sax imo

>> No.10031443

>>10031441
whoops hit enter too fast, if i'm thinking correctly the skirt is on mercari and there's a jsk on WW or CC???

>> No.10031448

>>10031273
Holy shit she got fat
>>10031296
I just think the stripes and faux belt make it ugly as sin. I bought it in sax and promptly sold it.

>> No.10031484

>>10031294
ageplay aside, the coord itself looks nice.

>> No.10031485

>>10031412
Why make yourself a jsk you have to wear with an underskirt? And I understand the appeal of elastic, but you need some shaping. I want to give her a hug and a decent bodice block.

>> No.10031598

>>10031485
Because trends anon

>> No.10031634

>>10031021
Blue shoes with a mint dress and wearing all the wristcuffs you own at once is definitely ita. Her Insta is a trash fire

>> No.10031638

>>10029563
>Adult kawaii fashions exist, there’s no excuse except being a fetishist.
I mean. Kids clothes are way cheaper.

>> No.10031640

>>10029543
This is almost somewhere

>> No.10031642

>>10028983
I think the angle is making everything look distorted which makes her look way bigger than she is. She's probably pretty tall though.

>>10030618
>Who shaves their legs this smoothly but has hairy underarms like that?
Lots of girls. Most girls where I live actually. It's a very common thing.

>> No.10031643

>>10030656
This is a great picture

>> No.10031645

>>10029608
Like everyone else has said but that makeup tho

>> No.10031646

>>10029858
What everyone says about lolitas

>> No.10031647

>>10031642
yeet yeet that's me i don't shave nothin but my lady bits

>> No.10031652

>>10030391
I respect the commitment and she saw it through to completion so she had to wear it at least once. But hopefully she realized it was a terrible idea afterwards.

>> No.10031653

>>10030844
The second one isn't really ita. Autism hands but not ita.

>> No.10031655

>>10031647
Keep your sissy fetish shit out of our comm

>> No.10031656

>>10031653
Please stop commenting and lurk more, you're clearly too clueless to know what you're talking about.

>> No.10031669
File: 146 KB, 840x960, 1535466232007.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10031669

>>10030866
>>10030732

The stock pic for the brown isn't too bad. I think the coord would've been fine if this girl stuck to the basic bitch white coord, it's the black that clashes way too much with the lighter pastels in the dress. That, and I don't understand getting the yellow x purple rather than the brown version if she was gonna Evee it up with more brown.

The more I'm on these threads the more I'm convinced most itas are simply people want to be "special" and "creative" instead of just doing a simple basic bitch coord that's safe and non-ita.

>> No.10031839

>>10031294
I really love this coord! Besides the white against the off white, bad make up and shoes, (which we can't see but I don't think she made a good choice) this isn't terrible.

>> No.10031846

>>10029972
Isn't that like.... Mezzo Piano teen though? I legit remember buying a Mezzo Piano piece for my cousin when she was like nine and it was kind of short on her. She's not a tall kid either.
>>10031638
In J-fashion, clothes cost money, so lemme just stop you right there.
>>10029608
I hate the fake freckles, they look like shit, but this is fine for casual save for the mismatched trainers.

>> No.10031851
File: 597 KB, 750x730, 2A19873E-EBBA-42A2-99CF-D4927FC8E843.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10031851

>> No.10031854

>>10031634
Okay, but why isn't anybody talking about her makeup and that awkward headpiece? That makeup is hideous and the face she's making doesn't help. It looks like she's about to cry.

>> No.10031855

>>10031669
I mean, that's probably why they're attracted to lolita in the first place.

>> No.10031865
File: 266 KB, 750x742, 7E56D988-AE0A-4615-B719-9FAD58B8F003.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10031865

>>10031851

>> No.10031871

>>10031855
Even the most "basic bitch" coord is special and unique compared to most fashion you see on a daily basis. People who don't wear lolita like actual clothes don't realize this though.

>> No.10031880
File: 376 KB, 835x1216, FCFDBEA2-79B2-4E63-AEFD-006C8E4C8835.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10031880

>>10031865

>> No.10031941

>>10031669
>Saggy eevee ear tits

No thanks

>> No.10031982

>>10031865
>lolandi visser

>> No.10031984
File: 449 KB, 750x729, ABD26D82-6DCF-4D92-8C4C-B7E480FCC451.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10031984

>>10031865

>> No.10031991
File: 545 KB, 750x742, 235A4D38-7BD3-41C5-87E7-E2E59B327EB2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10031991

>>10031984

>> No.10031997 [DELETED] 

>>10031982
>ooh I love my ugly toys

>> No.10031998

>>10031982
>ooh I love my ugly toys

(The bear is p cute though)

>> No.10032013

>>10029318
hey no fair blurring out your dirty living room so we can't make fun of it.

>> No.10032017

>>10030391
ugh ew gross no why
On top of everything its kraft cheese yellow. I hate everything about this

>> No.10032018

>>10030418
cursed

>> No.10032039
File: 685 KB, 576x975, 5B349395-F609-4DB2-8FCB-E83A77D48C44.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10032039

>> No.10032042
File: 130 KB, 640x640, BF5B7DD3-FF80-448B-8E45-83BCA0CDDB48.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10032042

>>10032039

>> No.10032045
File: 327 KB, 622x1280, E6A05B0B-D420-4E15-A796-A10841485F56.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10032045

>>10032042

>> No.10032056
File: 59 KB, 720x967, FB_IMG_1541968263792.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10032056

>> No.10032097

>>10031984
>Making nameless poem look bad

Fucking why? All you had to do was wear a simple black hair accessory instead of that garbage

>> No.10032111

>>10032042
I would like this with a black purse. It's not bad just different and edgy

>> No.10032123
File: 58 KB, 768x1280, 44525037_1158090594367264_5585360262686310400_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10032123

>> No.10032153

>>10031991
The blue shoes are probably matching the bonnet, but I wouldn't call it an ita.

>> No.10032169

>>10032123
Okay but what’s wrong with this besides no blouse

>> No.10032172

>>10032056
>>10032123
Someone has no concept of “avant garde”. Why are these in the ita thread?

>> No.10032174

>>10032045
Girl on the left looks fine from the shoulders down.
The girl on the right has a cute gijinka mimikyuu cosplay. Is she even supposed to be in lolita?

>> No.10032177

>>10032056
not ita, I wish she had a bustier though, I think it'd give it a more put-together ero feel.

>> No.10032192

>>10032056
I really like the proportions of this coord. This is ero done right.

>> No.10032195

>>10032123
This is fine, anon. Hasn't the no blouse rule been debated for a while now?

>> No.10032198

>>10032169
>>10032195
Nyart but that waist lump crease line is very unsightly and the bodice looks like it could bust a seam at any moment. The tights/hose have a weird distracting pattern. The goat head is totally out of place. Shiny fabric is shiny. Might be a nitpick, but that tight bodice...

>> No.10032202
File: 229 KB, 1027x1219, xtra0rdifairy_1___BqDaDMHHT8P___.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10032202

>> No.10032207

>>10032192
weird, I actually think the proportions are lacking/off. the blouse seems too long and she seems a bit too boxy in the waist, and the skirt seems a bit too far down on her torso/closer to hips than waist... a bustier would help so much

>> No.10032209

>>10032056
Those fishnets are very mall goth. Girl needs to stop acting pompous and stick to old school sweet.

>> No.10032220

>>10032209
To be fair the theme of the meet was basically edgy mall goth style. Not sure what's pompous about fishnet sleeves tho

>> No.10032223
File: 378 KB, 1200x1600, s-l1600.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10032223

>> No.10032228

>>10032198
It's an Atelier Pierrot dress, they have a thing for lustrous fabrics and they're supposed to be laced fairly tight (though I agree it's a bit too tight here and might be making the plastic boning buckle at the waist).

>> No.10032231

>>10032220
There wasn’t a theme of the meet, bad attempt at WKing trash chan.

>> No.10032235

>>10032231
>anyone who disagrees with me is OP
Ok anon

>> No.10032250

>>10032202
She should try fairy kei, I think she'd be better suited for that.

>> No.10032253 [DELETED] 

>>10032223
She’s about to fly away with take propeller on her head

>> No.10032255

>>10032223
She’s about to fly away with that propeller on her head.

>> No.10032312

>>10032223
This looks like a minor.

>> No.10032316
File: 112 KB, 715x960, 5FF7D1D3-D52E-4CEF-9B5D-CD930232673D.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10032316

>> No.10032339

>>10032097
I have this OP, and your post made me look more at her, and honestly the dress itself looks kind of weird too, maybe it's a replica? There are replicas of that OP in Aliexpress.

Not completely sure though, since the image res is small...

>> No.10032360

>>10032231
Nobody’s white-knighting her you walnut, most of us are just pointing out that this would be a fine example of ero lolita, especially with a bustier.

Someone here has a major vendetta against her, and they have since she posted that garbage pic lol.

>> No.10032373

>>10032153
Are you fucking blind??? Both of these people are hideous from head to toe. These are probably "babbys' first coords", but still....fucking disgusting. They need to start over from scratch.

>> No.10032386

>>10032373
Nayrt they're ugly but def not ita. Cover left girl's face and feet and cover right girl's face and arm then they look fine.

>> No.10032388

>>10032172
Because they're poorly executed.

>> No.10032389

>>10032123
The filter/shoop kind of makes it look like her face is melting, but I don't think it's ita

>> No.10032390

>>10032388
Sure, vendetta-chan.

>> No.10032411
File: 236 KB, 750x1006, 8940A659-1AC2-4754-AC15-3B7F5BECC7D1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10032411

Fairy kei ita who can’t spell the brand she is wearing.

>> No.10032419

>>10032056
Good lord no

>> No.10032423

>>10032390
>everyone who disagrees with me and doesn't like this coord is a vendetta-chan
Sure thing, paranoia-chan.

>> No.10032498
File: 199 KB, 720x960, 61346709-653C-4765-8827-A517C38E4D0F.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10032498

>> No.10032499
File: 121 KB, 720x960, 7C65B31E-B6F2-4569-B0F0-797647579FD2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10032499

>> No.10032500
File: 114 KB, 720x960, C305589D-2DBD-4E98-B3FF-E12BD022CF51.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10032500

>> No.10032513

>>10032498
nitpick

>> No.10032531

>>10032223
Her joy is proportionate to the awfulness of her dress/headbow. I can’t dislike happy looking itas, I just hope that they use that enthusiasm to learn to dress themselves.

>> No.10032533

>>10032056
leave garbage-chan alone this isn't even that bad desu i agree with the other anon about a bustier or something over the blouse/skirt area to pull the ero look together but it's a decent start

>> No.10032535

>>10032498
>>10032499
>>10032500
I wish people would realize that you can’t use Instagram type makeup for lolita. Also the importance of bangs continues to be ignored by itas everywhere.

>> No.10032547

>>10032535

Let's be real though, >>10032500's closeup is so shitty it doesn't matter what style they do, it's all going to be pretty shit.

They kind of have way more serious problems than just "bangs and wrong makeup" going on. Starting with whatever roleplaying shit they seem to have going on.

>> No.10032549

>>10032388
So how would you improve them, then?

>> No.10032566

>>10029135
this is one hundred percent not a girl

>> No.10032572

>>10032566
I have a surprise for you anon:
Girls can be ugly too

>> No.10032592
File: 257 KB, 1080x1350, erikaklash_1___Bp7nYvPgfWz___.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10032592

Taged as lolita fashion.

>> No.10032602

>>10030844
>>10031195
Someone please shoop this

>> No.10032608

>>10032592
Goddamn it, I love drag and Erika is a good performer but someone needs to sit her down and explain what lolita actually is and how to tag things.

>> No.10032629

>>10032535
And why not? Not everyone in the fashion wants to look like an ~innocent whimsical young girl~ or bland unbaked dough face. Heavy makeup, even Instagram makeup, can work well with lolita depending on the wearers face and sub style they’re wearing.

>> No.10032664

>>10032498
When are itas going to learn that those fucking elf ears are not ok

>> No.10032682

>>10032629
>Not everyone in the fashion wants to look like an ~innocent whimsical young girl~
Maybe they shouldn't be wearing lolita then, because that's the base concept of it. Gothic lolita lends itself to heavier makeup but the concept is still there.

>> No.10032707

>>10032629
Lolita isn't for you. You probably wear IG Thot makeup. May I suggest slutty cosplay if that's your thing?

>> No.10032709

>>10032629
Might as well say that not everyone in lolita wants to wear frilly dresses lol

>> No.10032714

>>10032682
>>10032707
>>10032709

diff anon but it is beyond dumb of you guys to not even want to admit that you can wear lolita without looking like an innocent child

whether or not you think heavy glam insta-style makeup is appropriate is a separate issue

>> No.10032716

>>10032714
Whimsy is the heart of the fashion, anon, and there's nothing whimsical about instathot makeup.

>> No.10032717

>>10032592
>>10032608
It's pretty cool for club kid throwback?

>> No.10032726
File: 44 KB, 500x291, 1398029032187.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10032726

>>10032714
You don't seem to understand the aesthetic of the fashion, at all. Wear as much instathot makeup as you want whenever else, but not in lolita.

>> No.10032735
File: 214 KB, 444x365, u92sTFy.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10032735

>>10032629
>>10032714
What is it with these retards deeply misunderstanding what lolita is? Pic related too. Keep your contouring and brick eyebrows to your basic bitch normie wear, if you don't want to look like a doll, this fashion isn't for you.

>> No.10032763

>>10032056
something about this is a little too tame, for lack of a better word. I think the legwear could be more sheer, or even net. or even a bustier over the blouse, like >>10032177 said.
It's not ita, but it's not polished yet.

>> No.10032764

>>10032123
not ita. come on newfriends.

>> No.10032767

>>10029608
>>10029609
>>10031991
>>10032056
>>10032123
nitpicks/not ita

>> No.10032768

>>10032716
>whimsy
plz no

>> No.10032772
File: 52 KB, 444x287, wat.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10032772

>>10032768
What's your problem?

>> No.10032774

>>10030844
God this reminds me so much of myself when I first started out.

>> No.10032778
File: 130 KB, 960x960, 46161818_10156820983173126_3973295591517061120_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10032778

>>10032768
cringey word that middle age women who go to painting parties use.

pic unrelated but maybe also whimsy

>> No.10032779
File: 127 KB, 640x960, 46043098_10218508339605524_8556934215076151296_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10032779

>>10032778
iron yo shiz, but the wrinkles arent the worst part of this coord

>> No.10032780

>>10032778
Isn't it just the noun of "whimsical"? I don't see how it's cringey at all.

>> No.10032781

>>10032123
Kinda cute, reminds me of Sarah from The Fearless Vampire Killers.

>> No.10032798

>>10032779
I don’t get the Holy Lantern OTKs, there’s no red in the print and the silver clashes with the gold print

>> No.10032806

>>10031021
Maybe she got sexually harassed by the Leighs and started stress eating.
Serves her right.

>> No.10032883
File: 60 KB, 768x1024, harry potter ita.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10032883

harry potter cord....
YIKES

>> No.10032885

>>10032223
Did she just like, tie the waist ties around her head or...

>> No.10032889
File: 17 KB, 300x225, 2132_300.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10032889

>>10032885
That's what Baby's wired headbows look like when you "unfold" them, for lack of a better term.

>> No.10032897

>>10032223
aw, she's cute. She needs a petti desperately, and to dump that headbow. There's a lot more wrong, but girl, focus on buying a petti

>> No.10032899

>>10032056
I don't like this, but it's not really ita. As others said, it's unpolished.

>> No.10032902

>>10032735
Make me, fuggo chan.
If you want everyone to look like dolls maybe you should join the living doll community instead. Catering to you is no one’s priority.

>> No.10032904

>>10032902
Why are you calling them fuggo when ugly (or insecure) girls are usually the ones caking on makeup?
Also I've never seen a Japanese lolita cake on makeup and they're the ones who made the fashion so...

>> No.10032908

>>10031294
Who is this?

>> No.10032909

>>10032908
OP pic

>> No.10032910

>>10032902
Oof, no wonder the community is the way it is, it's full of normies like you.

>> No.10032914

>>10032123
Coord is fine, whatever she did to her face cannot be forgiven tho

>> No.10032915

>>10032097
Nameless Poem is literal garbage, it's not hard to make it look worse

>> No.10032922

>>10032735
>>10032726
You sound like someone who proudly displays “no makeup” on their social media profiles for special snowflake points.

>> No.10032928

>>10032779

Isn't this the kidsyoyo Halloween dress?

Does it normally look this bad? Asking it's on my wishlist.

>> No.10032930

>>10032922
I’d rather see “no makeup” than instathot makeup on a lolita

>> No.10032934

>>10032883
The dress, blouse and tie are cute. Needs better shoes and hat

>> No.10032936

>>10032915
Agree it's not a nice dress but it's so plain it's easy to coord

>> No.10032944

>>10032930
I bet you’re just poor and can’t afford makeup or are too stupid to apply it. Any makeup over no makeup is better suited for lolita.

>> No.10032965

>>10032944
Nah, anon here is probably just some creepy fat dude that believes women shouldn’t wear make up because it’s lying and hopes to find himself an innocent virginal looking lolita gf

>> No.10032966

>>10032549
On the "ero" coord, a different blouse entirely. That one is simply too long and too sweet in my opinion. I would also change the hair and that's it.
The other coord needs higher quality accessories, better posing, styled hair, and loosen the corset ties in the back.

>> No.10032968

>>10032944
>>10032965
There's a middle ground between no makeup and ig makeup

>> No.10032970

>>10032123
That face shoop makes her look like the Youtube shooter

>> No.10033082

>>10032763
Her post said the leg wear is net. It's probably just the shit lighting. I agree with you and the other anon about the blouse being all wrong. Did she say the coord was meant to be ero anywhere?

>she said she accepts crit on her post but I have a feeling she'd take it poorly (she's so obnoxious I can't fucking stand her) I don't blame anons for saying it here instead of on facebook t b h

>> No.10033161

>>10032944
Nah, I’m just not a fan of instathot makeup in lolita. I put “no makeup” in quotations because who doesn’t wear makeup in lolita? Even if it’s just gloss, eyeliner and mascara. It’s seriously not that hard to overdo it lmao
>>10032965
>anyone that doesn’t like slut makeup in lolita is a neckbeard
wew lad

>> No.10033179

>>10029608
That dark orange color in her sweater really irks me, it would be so much cuter if it was all pastels. Doesn't look like lolita, not even casual, but it's a cute girl and outfit.

>> No.10033183

>>10030418
Fucking sissies are ivading the fashion and all the tags.

>> No.10033185
File: 203 KB, 822x1155, 0174503F-83A0-4B3B-9707-F03F2BDA4582.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10033185

>>10032968
No shit, Sherlock. ’instathot’ make up is still going to be a better look than being bare faced in a flashy outfit. It looks incomplete and lazy.

>>10033161
You’d be surprised how many actually go bare faced in lolita. It’s a common complaint but I see it more towards newbies anymore. you can’t really blame someone for thinking ‘neckbeard incel’ when they’re complaining about women wearing too much make up since again, it’s incredibly common and immediately associating heavier make up with being a slut. It’s not like Mana went minimal in the make up department or anything, he certainly experimented with heavy, visual kei and borderline gothic drag queen make up while wearing the fashion so who are you to say what should or shouldn’t be appropriate make up for lolita? Not everyone in this fashion wishes to be some demure, innocent ‘dolly’ type figure.

>> No.10033194

>>10032682
>>10032707
Mana would like a word with you

>> No.10033214
File: 507 KB, 1536x2128, AAD06A05-CECC-4E1A-AEC8-FF72AFDA6633.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10033214

>> No.10033218

>>10033214
it looks like her head was photoshopped on a different body

>> No.10033224

>>10033185

>comparing mana's makeup to some wannabe youtube guru's 'sunset halo eye with Morphe's Jaclyn Hill collab with dried out lips and eyebrows the size of my forehead' for the thousandth time
>thinking every criticism of makeup is about someone being a slut

No lol it's because it is unflattering, is not inspirational, and overdone as fuck. Most of it doesn't even fit lolita. Maybe anon wasn't hitting it with 'uwu u hav to b innocent' but gothic makeup isn't exactly instathot makeup either. And at least Mana was being experimental and theme fitting to what he was wearing, which is what people used to do before the plague of youtube gurus.

>> No.10033252

>>10032883
Nitpick. Tie aside, this is a really cute simple coord. It would've looked better if she had done something else to implement the Hufflepuff theme or tried to work around the tie instead of just tacking it on but either way this is far from ita.

>> No.10033262

>>10032629
you know there are more makeup styles than "innocent whimsical young girl" and heavy ass trendy instagram makeup right? huge heavy brows and ten pounds of highlighter to offset caked on bronzer just doesn't look good with this fashion.

>> No.10033263
File: 15 KB, 236x310, 0dc0b87468002df4d2e533d533e2233a--rock-makeup-fx-makeup.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10033263

>>10033185
>>10033194
Heavy make up =/= Instagram/Kardashian make up
Mana's make up would still ook really out of place on modern sweet or classic, maybe ott sweet or old school sweet if you really nailed it. Insta make up can work if you're wearing a dark dramatic outfit, tone it down to suit the style, change it to fit your face, and you're only wearing it for a photoshoot but usually it it just puts all the attention on your face in a bad way. Same as if you went without make up, just on the opposite extreme. Instead of J-goth I'd say it's much closer to deathrock make up. Bold and somewhat samefacey because it's a very narrow structured style that doesn't change much based on skin tone or facial features.

>> No.10033270
File: 757 KB, 750x874, 27C12451-3205-4417-A003-458C5BCF162C.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10033270

Found this in the Lolita tag and the caption is just weird

>> No.10033271
File: 205 KB, 750x336, 42162319-B573-46F9-8A7B-AFD3E37C722E.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10033271

>>10033270

>> No.10033274
File: 9 KB, 236x177, 1525417451791.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10033274

>>10033271
is she blind?????? her hair is cute but this is normie as fuCK

>> No.10033276

>>10033271
Cute but not at all Lolita.
I don't know about other people but 9/10 when I wear a tucked in shirt with a skirt people say they "love my dress" like it's one item. That might be where the comment is from.

>> No.10033303
File: 1.58 MB, 924x1124, Kawaii-1[1].png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10033303

>> No.10033315

>>10033276
This pisses me off so much. Wearing a skirt and obviously different shirt, "love your dress!" like nigga what. From both females and males.

>>10033303
This... hurts. Everything about this hurts.

>> No.10033319

>>10033303
Is that Salopette supposed to be like the poor man’s version of MRC lol

>> No.10033360
File: 141 KB, 250x250, 1500135354090.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10033360

>>10032778
>my personal associations dictate the meaning of this word
"whimsical" has a ton of different connotations, and while i'm familiar with what you're referring to, connotations vary across groups. i can tell that you're probably 15 (disparaging older women for attempting to gain skills/have social lives? if only they were cool enough to show up for some watered down shitposting a decade late like you!) but try having some tact and lurking more. the phrase isn't typically taken to have the same vibe as your mom's pinterest board within lolita.

>> No.10033381

>>10033303
That kimono is so bad. Even if there weren't goddamn rickrac around the yukata and it weren't eyeblinding, the shape alone is objectionable. Needs one of those stiffener/ padding things under the "obi," whatever they're called

>> No.10033392

>>10033214
What is happening here her head is terrifying

>> No.10033394
File: 758 KB, 1548x554, DARIMUDARESU.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10033394

>> No.10033398
File: 65 KB, 580x580, m_5a485d2545b30c8493189345.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10033398

>>10033315
I'm not sure normies are good at layering and stuff. It's the only way I can think of to explain items like pic related, where you can clearly get the same affect with two different common items but the designers decided to combine them for some reason.
Same shit with dresses that are a knit top and totally different skirt or jackets that have a fake vest layered with them

>> No.10033409

>>10033262
>>10033263
>>10033224
You retarded and just get it or??? Come on now.

>> No.10033427

>>10033394
Wut

>> No.10033440

>>10033409
>People goes down to basics to explain why your argument isn’t valid
>”UR RETARDED REEEE”

ok anon whatever makes you feel better

>> No.10033513

>>10033398

There's some reasoning behind some of it, with summer stuff the fake vests make more sense as it removes a layer (usually the back is only one layer instead of two), so it's lighter and more breathable. Other times they're combined so people who are lazy and like a single dress don't have to hunt for coordinating pieces (kind of like how some people think skirts are difficult to coord with now).

Maybe it makes everyone else assume people are generally wearing onepieces instead of layering items anymore, idk.

>> No.10033552

>>10032056
>The Emperor's new JSK

>> No.10033574

>>10031865
The Whos of Whoville

>> No.10033589

>>10033303
Wearing yukata like a dead body.

>> No.10033614

>>10031998
I loled

>>10032388
I'd like to see you do it better, anon.

>>10032735
They're just in it for the attention and blindly follow trends without ever thinking for themselves. Give it five years and they'll be wearing whatever makeup style instahoes of the future are into with lolita. They're the same people who stuff underskirts under everything whether it looks good or not... they see a trend and follow it but are incapable of seeing the bigger picture and realizing that checking off a list of trends doesn't automatically look good.

>> No.10033781
File: 471 KB, 750x882, 1130CE6D-55E0-4C05-8BF5-A87A870F4A50.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10033781

>> No.10033815

>>10033214
why did they photoshop their head to retard proportions?

>> No.10033828
File: 120 KB, 540x960, 807E14FE-B676-4188-8263-687D78DED9D0.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10033828

>> No.10033894

>>10033828
Wow, I hate to think how much she had to pay for that bra but glad she is wearing one and the gogo boots don’t go. Though I guess closet cosplay attempt at chibi moon?

>> No.10033906

>>10033894
No, this was posted to a lolita and J Fashion group

>> No.10034021

>>10030791
Poop Chan needs to get that huge ring out of her nose she looks like a bull

>> No.10034557

>>10034021
Is that poop-chan? Either she gained a lot of weight or normally uses a ton of shoop. I hope there aren’t multiple people who think that splatter-paint mall goth clown makeup is a good idea.

>> No.10035269
File: 20 KB, 240x240, AACD798D-0710-46E2-8DC8-0A366315EFED.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10035269

Whatever this is supposed to be.

>> No.10035928

>>10034557
i thought poop-chan was always fat

>> No.10037079

>>10028976
muh absolute dick

>> No.10037285

Every time I feel bad about a coord not being absolutely fabulous, these threads make me feel 10X better...and these did not disappoint.

>> No.10037578

>>10035269
My guess is the start to some mime porn.

>> No.10038117

>>10034021
>>10035928
I thought poop chan was Kate because of the whole bathroom incident?

>> No.10039501

>>10037578
I wouldn’t go that far, but whoever that is needs to invest in some wigs or wash her hair before posting pictures. I can almost smell this picture as it is now.

>> No.10039555

>>10038117
I thought she was diarrhea-chan.

>> No.10040472

>>10038117
No she's girlypoot