/cgl/ - Cosplay & EGL

>>9854229

>>9854230

>>9854232

>>9854232
Is this naturallytoot? She actually looks pretty good here.

>>9854234

>>9854236

>>9854237

>>9854238

>>9854240

>>9854242

>>9854243

>>9854240
The hair is really cute but I don't like how her bangs curl in so much on the sides. It makes it look like a botched haircut.

>>9854245

>>9854248
End dump

>>9854250

>>9854266

>>9854266
This is good but waaaay too short on him(?)

>>9854269
She looks so cute, I just wish she’d chosen a different lipstick but that’s entering nitpick territory.
>At least it’s not yellow I guess

>>9854240
This looks kind of unbalanced. I like the hair, but I think it would look better with a longer and more voluminous skirt to balance it out.

>>9854270
her. just a tall girl

>>9854232
Is who I think it is? She made lots of progress if it's her!

>>9854240
A hot mess, as usual. She's somehow really endearing though, cutie pie.

>>9854269
She was half-way there, but the lipstick and the tiara make it a nitpick for me.

>>9854266
Hair looks a bit granny and this would benefit from an underskirt.

>>9854270
It’s a girl, she’s just v tall. I love the coord a whole lot and I’m good with leggy but she should definitely do an underskirt with this.

>>9854349
She wore it for her wedding

>>9854237
Oh, No

>>9854238
This isn't bad but it's kinda mediocre for annette and yes I am jelly about not having this dress

>>9854431

>>9854432

>>9854434

>>9854434
She looks so earnest and happy that it makes her eyesore coordinate a bit more tolerable.

>>9854237
She has a such a cute face; someone please save her from herself.

>>9854432
This screams "I let my normie friend play dressup."

>>9854237
She looks so despondent like these would be stock footage for a commericial with Sarah Mclaughlin playing in the background.
"For just a dollar a day, you can help itas just like this one afford a proper petticoat"

>>9854409
While cute, this doesn't seem like a wedding coordinate.

>>9854250
what the fuck is wrong with her face

>>9854266
The wig is unpleasant
>>9854248
Why the fuck would you combine those colors what the actual fuck ew
>>9854243
This is such a cool coord, don't remember seeing anything like it lately.

>>9854250
That underskirt is tacky af and please trim your bangs, they look like shit

>>9854237
What is with all these Cosmic itas recently?

>>9854434
Somehow I can’t hate this because of how intentional it looks

>>9854266
I really think a underskirt would make this look much better. And maybe pearly white shoes to pull in the necklace and purse.

>>9854266
>AP is short, don’t tell me to wear underskirts ;)
Alright, her coords just became 100% less cute due to her shit attitude

>>9854661
K bitch go flash everyone your ass.

>>9854436
Lena Dunham??

>>9854466
Lost it

>>9854673
And this is how you do military lolita

>>9854243
This is such a cute coord, and she is cute too.

>>9854661
Seriously she's making her otherwise cute coords look really obscene and bad with how short it is on her.

>>9854673
This is great.

>>9854703
>>9854672
Exactly, it’s not our problem that you look ridiculous when people have you tips and you took it personally as an insult to your height or something. Just gtf over it and buy a black underskirt like a normal tall girl so you aren’t showing your bloomers in front of Mana and everyone.

>>9854230
I think that's the best use of that donut headband I have seen so far.

>>9854242
Cute coord but the fact that her purse is actually a tissue box holder is making me laugh!

>>9854661
I don't see that line as bad attitude, that's just a bit of humor. I get what she's saying on her post because I too like underskirts with gothic and some classic, but I feel they would be a bad fit for AP/sweet.

>>9854432
Switch the hair and makeup and the tights and this could look decent.

>>9854243
I like the color balance and the use of glasses as an accessory.

>>9854713
I’ve seen them look alright with sweet. You just have to do it properly. I too enjoy the hot hot leg that comes with tree lolitas but there’s a point at which you should really fear a slight breeze, and that’s the point at which an underskirt would be your best friend.

>>9854673
Hey Nazi-Chan from last week, THIS is how you do military lolita. Same shape hat, 0% nazi

>>9854725
All the aesthetic of a bad ass bitch, now with zero the nazi!

>>9854490
Shut up not everything has to have an underskirt.

>>9854751
Nayrt but nobody wants to see your ass except maybe your s/o

Showing ass or Godwin's law? Who will win the derailment this time? Only time will tell.

>>9854751
You're right. But when you start looking like a modest stripper, you may want to consider one.

>>9854725
>>9854746
I missed it, who was the Nazi girl last week?

>>9854751
If you can bend over and the world sees your not wearing bloomers then yes you need either a longer skirt or an underskirt. It’s a basic part of lolita modesty. The skirt shouldn’t be at your thighs. It should be closer to your knees.

>>9854713
You got the tissue cover for free if you spent a certain amount from baby. I have two of them and don’t know what to do with them. She just gave me an idea.

>>9854436
>>9854237
Why is she suddenly back?

>>9854661
Imo, I don't see that as bad attitude. An underskirt would look shitty and out of place with a lot of AP stuff.

also
>I'd rather see a slim girl in a too short dress than a short fatty stuffed into a dress.

>>9854436
looks like a candy sprinkle knockoff

>>9854661
Her coord looks cute to me. I think under skirts suck half the time with AP

>>9854921
>>9854859
Oh look, she found the thread.

>>9854266
>>9854661
These would actually look cuter with less poof IMO. That would solve the length problem without any underskirts.

>>9854923
>thinking anyone with a different opinion is samefagging

>>9854927
Okay but why do you want to show your ass to everyone so badly?

>>9854232
This hot mess got married, wonder how long that will last as it seems like she can't function without her mommy
Nice fake nail that's either glued on crooked or just falling off.
Christ.

>>9854923
Yup. Let’s see how this roller coaster goes. Will she take crit with grace and improve? Or will she be a nice juicy source of cringe we have been getting a lot of lately?

>>9854675
Change the socks and this will be perfect.

>>9854661
she could at least take her pics from a higher angle to reduce the amount of leggy damn. This is coming from a tall lolita too.

>>9854921
Except the way that she's coorded this would absolutely work with an underskirt and would look a million times better.

>>9854266
she managed to make herself look really masculine here. necklace is too big it hides her neck, the bolero is not fitted well and gives her the appearance of a much broader back and shoulders than irl. the body position and chin down angle really don't help. this wig does not suit her face shape either, unfortunately.
this is also through-and-through vintage styling and not lolita. the makeup and wig styling is very western, which firmly places this in vintage territory.

>>9854269
I actually really like the lip and tiara. it all suits here and still looks jfash. her hair looks lovely with this.

>>9854436
I wish she'd match her colors better and pay attention to silho. it's awkwardly half casual and half dressy which isn't working.

>>9854667
very cute
>>9854673
yes, this is bomb!!

>>9855455
Why does this look like it was stolen from Weibo

>>9855459

>>9855461

>>9855462

>>9855463
Heart hands as headpiece

Kek

>>9854354
>>9854490
>>9854661
Yeah I saw this and immediately deleted the positive comment I'd left on her previous photo and blocked her. No one needs your ita attitude to go with your ~retro~ coords.

>>9855461
I feel like tucking in the blouse would make this better.

>>9854230
Those bear ears are so cute. She's really pretty too.

>>9855528
You are the hero we need anon.

>>9854859
Why is it one or the other? I’d rather see a tall slim girl with a skirt that’s long enough and a short fatty in a dress that fits her.

>>9855462
Cut yo wig’s bangs

>>9854661
I think people are getting a bit bent out of shape by an obvious tongue-in-cheek comment. Especially >>9855528
I'm not a big fan of these coords, I don't like retro lolita in general, but you guys need thicker skin about comments that weren't even targeted to you.

>>9854929
when 'sorry you got posted' is the only argument to someone disagreeing with you, just know you've lost.

t. a lonelita who doesn't even post to cof, I just think you're too defensive.

>>9855629
Nobody said that though.

>>9854675
Bigger lolitas: This is how you dress for your size. I really love this, except for the socks which are mediocre.

>>9855459
It's very taobao-model somehow, I really see it. But I'm not sure why either...

>>9855462
Jesus Christ, shoop less. You look cute, you don't need to make yourself look literally plastic

>>9855463
I'm the one who mistook her for fisksamlaren in the last thread until I clicked on the pic and fuck, she caught me again!?

>>9855455
This is almost cute, but those shoes make her legs look stumpy and she needs a little more petti.

>>9854682
>Blue toned bag on a warm coord
>Cosplay pink hair
>Hideous hat
This coord needs so much editing.

>>9855637
It's the combination of the bg, filter, and her wig

>>9855662
>wig
NAILED IT. It's totally the weird ashy wig that looks like it doesn't quite fit her. Why does every Chinese lolita seem to love these?

>>9855636
Someone posted her in the ita thread. It's a nitpick.

>>9854725
Fuck off with your virtue signaling, no one gives a shit.

>>9855538
Tucking in the face would make it better.

>>9855712
NYART but I think this one looks better. It's not virtue signalling if I say nazi-chan legit looked like a crappy edgelord, which she did compared to this girl.

>>9855712
lol triggered

>>9855621
Usually people don’t care but the attitude about it is why people will pull likes and comments because that shit is something that shouldn’t be praised. If you are going to be a bitch about some small crit even in a tongue and cheek statement then one less like and comment shouldn’t bother you. But obviously it does because you feel entitled to likes and comments your behaviors.

>>9854248
this makes me want to punch something.

>>9854250
all i can see when i look at her face

>>9855846
Again, I'm not the girl who posted them, but say what you want. Sure, her comment was a bit insipid (and as a fellow tall-chan who likes to work around her height, it's rather grating to hear her act as if she's the only one brave enough to ever show a bit of her thigh). However it's the people on this thread acting as if she skinned a baby that make me eyeroll more than her dumb comment.

>>9854434
I genuinely think this would be passable casual without those godawful dreads and everything else she has on her head.

>>9854232
Imagine being this much of a greasy bitch on your wedding day. Congrats Mrs. Naturally Racist.

>>9856064
Yeah shit I didn't even consider that until just now. The crappy acrylics and cheap overall look and greasy, limp, unstyled hair... ugh, the pussy must be fucking mindblowing or else her husband is just literally a goddamn hunchback or something. I can't imagine willingly deciding to marry that, let alone showing up to the altar and seeing this hot mess as your "blushing bride" and not turning around and fucking running away.

>>9856120
Her husband looks like he has the downs

>>9855882
how would you suggest she say it then? she realizes her skirt is "too short" as per the fashion's guidelines, and realizes wearing an underskirt would make it conform to the guidelines, but has made the intentional design choice to keep the shorter silhouette. should she just say that? "the shorter skirt is an intentional design choice in this coord"?

>>9854675
Selfie angles sure change things lol. Unless there's meitu involved too.

>>9855882
Agreed. Someone not wanting to wear an underskirt as a conscious stylistic choice is hardly a reason to act like your puppy was just murdered with a pickaxe. From her previous coords, it's not like she's an ita who doesn't know how to dress, it's just that she decided to go against the established guidelines for this coord. For a fashion that was born from breaking off from mainstream, y'all are sure against experimenting.

>>9854661
She looks like Philomena Cunk

>>9856282
If she bends over you will see her ass or bloomers. That shit isn’t kawaii and isn’t what the fashion is about. It IS her choice to not wear an underskirt. Saying something like “I am aware the skirt is short. I’m working with what I have” is all that needs to be said. Not some sassy remark and defiantly not getting super defensive when someone suggest a underskirt. She won’t get a like or comment from me because I don’t like how short her skirt is. She’s not entitled to having my like and I’m free to remove my comment or like if I feel so. Just like she is free to not wear an underskirt and make sassy remarks about people talking about it.

>>9855723
She was wearing the set, she was polite, she gave no indication that she's a bigot.
And while there are actual real life nazis you all could be directing your anger to, like the AM nazi who's literally a white supremacist.
Nope, gotta pick on some girl because she wore a hat indoors.

That my friend is 'virtue signaling' saying you're on the right side of morality so you look good, not because you actually give a shit.

>>9856307
>If she bends over you will see her ass or bloomers.
Why would she do that though? Isn't it common sense NOT to bend in half if you pick something?

>>9856271
I was defending her desu, if it were me I wouldn't really bother saying anything, or 'I like how this looks with a little more leg'. Either way, there would have been comments saying she needed an underskirt, so I'm guessing her comment was meant to stem the flow of concrit about that. Either way, blocking someone because they dared to say that AP is short is just too much.

>>9856516
You aren't a woman, are you? Or if you are you've somehow never worn a short skirt

>>9856531
I'm a woman. I somehow couldn't find better pic to demonstrate what I mean, but I guess it works.
No fucking way anyone can see your ass if you do the squat thingy. Also I apologise if it's also called bending over, English isn't my native language.

>>9856544
That way she’d flash the people in front of her rather than the people behind her.

The thing with lolita skirts is that they’re so poofy, and it’s much much easier to accidentally flash your underwear than with skirts that are more form-fitting. It’s why bloomers are an essential part of lolita and why 50’s women also wore bloomers or long slips with their crinolines. No matter how careful you are about bending or walking up stairs, flashing your butt is always a risk with AP in particular.

>>9856518
Nayrt, but AP isn't too short. She's just too tall. Get over it. You look stupid complaining about clothes that weren't made for you.

>>9856553
What are bloomers? I always have mine on unless it’s v hot and I’m wearing tights. Safeguarding against unruly wind gusts.

>>9856559
Oops responded to the wrong post. Bloomer solidarity.

>>9856553
This. Bloomers all the way. Do people not wear them? I honestly always wear them unless I’m wearing tights and it’s too hot. The thought of just having underwear on under my petti seems gross to me... and it’s a lot easier to wash bloomers than petticoats

>>9856567
I wear regular shorts, does that count?

>>9856567
I wear safety shorts if I'm not wearing tights. I've never gone with just panties under my petti before, that doesn't sound comfortable.

>>9856567
i wear uncute sport shorts entirely so anyone trying to sneak a look will be disappointed.

I hate underskirts. Tall lolitas that aren't afraid to show their knees ftw

>>9856600
Nobody cares if we see their knees, it's their ass people are complaining about

>>9856553
>>9854758
So are you just assuming she doesn't wear bloomers?

>>9856602
>>9856553
>>9854758
So are you just assuming she doesn't wear bloomers?

>>9856606
Is this you? Is that why you're getting so defensive? Because for a while now it's been in general and not just about her

>>9856600
I also hate underskirts, but I hate tall lolitas who flash their ass every time the wind blows more.

Thank god for tall lolitas who actually wear things that fit them properly.

Are Taobao stock photo looking Chinese coslitas going to be the next big get-popular-quick thing on COF? Stay tuned for more.

>>9856677
God, I hope not. Chinese coslitas are so fucking tacky.

>>9855461 why the black bag tho?

>>9856677
>that giant petti camel toe

>>9856609
I just thought it was sus that people are bringing up asses, makes me think they themselves don't wear bloomers and they're projecting. You can see someone's ass better in skinny jeans than in bloomers.

>>9856841
I don't get it either. I wear Liz Liza skorts or plain shorts under my short skirt coords. Nobody bats an eye when I wear the skorts as the ONLY bottom piece in public, so why would my ass somehow be exposed MORE after putting a skirt over it?

I am pretty embarrassed over the fact that I previously did very short and tight bike pants instead of bloomers or skorts though. What you don't always realize as a new tall Lolita is that even if you look proper in the mirror, everyone else's set of eyes are gonna come from a different angle.

>>9854673
She's gorgeous

>>9855528
well, thats a wee bit dramatic..

>>9854667
Ok I think her coords are always pretty cute, but her wig bothers me (and she almost always wears the same one). I think the color doesn't suit her skin tone and make her eyebrows look far too dark in comparison, even though she is drawing them in lighter.

>>9857233
Blocking is pretty dramatic. But pulling back a like and comment because the person is behaving in a way you don’t want to support isn’t.

>>9856935

Because lolita is meant to be an aggressively modest fashion. It takes the standards of feminine outfits having to be form fitting, sexy, or 'lady like' and says fuck you to them. That's part of the style and the movement. Liz Lisa isn't lolita, Liz Lisa has a completely different style. Of course no normalfag is going to police you for a thigh high skirt because that's generally accepted as part of casual wear. But lolita has different standards. Why? It's got a different aesthetic for the reasons above, and having thigh length skirts puts it away from lolita aesthetic and not closer.

>>9856677
I'm tired enough of the ones that pop in already, please no more

>>9856677
>>9856720
>>9857410
Are you guys that jealous that you don't have money to blow and people to take nice photos?

>>9857406
Have you ever seen old school street snaps?
>Aggressivly modest
No one is going to tell me that three layers of frills and lace is somehow more „modest” than what most women wear.
Also other anon said they wear Liz Lisa shorts as bloomers, they are not supposed to be seen.

>>9854432
The sweet / gothic balance in this is ALL out of whack.

>>9857421
>money to blow
>on taobao
gr8 b8 got me to reply

>>9854931
still waiting to see the pictures of the groom. I'm convinced he isn't real

>>9857488
>implying most chinese lolitas don't buy more AP than you can afford
jelly poorfag confirmed

>>9857488
>implying most western based chinese lolitas don't buy more AP than you can afford
jelly poorfag confirmed

>>9856677

isn't this the chick that started that kickstarter for the cat ear suitcases in 2016 and still hasn't sent them out?

>>9855459
Probably cause of her shooped face and the clean background?

Probably more of her face though, the shoop is pretty heavy.

>>9857421
>>9857497
But >>9856677 is wearing cheap shitty taobao from head to toe. There definitely are a lot of western Chinese lolitas who are rich though. Doesn't look like she's one of them.

>>9856558
It's like you didn't read my post at all

>>9857497
Most Chinese are poor, that’s how taobao thrives.

>>9857509
On that note any updates on that project?

>>9857584
Did you read her post? She said western Chinese lolitas. As for non westerners, for every poorfag Chinese lolita, there's an insanely rich one. That's why there are so many taobao brands and also why brands cater to Chinese lolitas simultaneously. Western Chinese lolitas seem to be rich too but not nearly as well-off as the rich ones from China.

>>9857511
How can you tell she shooped her face? I'm asking because it isn't apparent to me.

>>9854661
I think her coords are nice and she has a nice figure and it's not bad that she's showing some legs. It's rather the shape of her petti that's a bit off and that you can see the inside of the skirt and the petticoat in this coord >>9854266
. So if she changed the angle from where she takes pictures it would look much better. She also needs to cut her bangs or find a less plastic looking wig, it's kind of cheap looking.

>>9857602
Easy one, look at the hair that lays on her face.

>>9857406
Did you even read the discussion?

>>9857406
Underskirts and longer dresses were trendy when you found out about lolita, but that doesn't mean it's the ultimate lolita look that everyone must wear. Almost everything I have hits above my knees and I'm only 160 cm.

>>9857573
Wtf are you talking about? That dress is btssb Circus Print Ribbon. I don’t think there’s a replica of that one.

>>9857611
nobody cares if your knees are showing? it's when your dress is mid thigh or higher like in >>9854661 that people bring up underskirts.

>>9857584
Hasn't even been sent out (according to the kickstarter). I heard a few months back that they hadn't even settled on a factory to make them.

>>9857605
It's because it looks smoothed out and the hair color is smudged into her skin? (I'm going to get better at spotting this gulls I swear)

>>9854248
Why do people think that having a big ticket item like AP's Dream Sky is an excuse to slack off on literally everything else.

>>9854266
Jackie Kennedy? Is that you?

>>9857587
>>9857584
western based also includes the super rich ones that come here for college/jobs, too

>>9857573
>>9857488
>when you can't even recognize brand dresses

>>9857882
>when she clearly blew all her money on the main piece and coordinated with all cheap shit, grimoire replicas included

can people try using a brain cell or two in this thread

>>9857903
>backtracking this hard because you thought brand was taobao
poorfags gonna poor

>>9854431
I feel that this outfit is inconsistent between witchy nd religious, and would be better as one or the other.

Sauce on that cape?

RC's resident idiot also has giant cow tits.

The shoop on this is concerning.

Stahp.

>>9858003
Why is she an idiot? Sometimes I want to like posts like this because I feel bad/it seems encouraging for beginners. I don't know who this is.

>>9858010
Just find her, look her name up in Rufflechat and read her posts. Total airhead.

>>9858013
Seems like she's trying to get help to improve at least. She's just new.

>>9858009
She has a good body type for lolita. But that face...

>>9857421
i'm just kind of weirded out by the fact that she's so desperate to impress people that she rented/bought that huge flower garland photo prop...'s not jealous-inducing so much as it's screaming, 'thirsty for approval'.

>>9856836
I can't unsee this now. She got such a nice background. Would have been good if she made sure her skirt was hanging nicely too.

>>9858003
Just because you can get it on doesn't mean it fits. I have seen worse in this dress though.

>>9858008
uncanny

>>9858009
>>9858008
Nightmare fuel, please reconsider that fucking blush

>>9858003
Are those black lines seriously her bra straps or is that just a weird blouse collar that doesn't match the dress? Either way, yikes.

Obviously not the worst coord and I can see her having potential if she takes concrit to heart, but the poor fit, odd blouse choice, frumpy hair and lack of wrist accessories toss this firmly in the "Nice Effort Still Ita" category

>>9858036
Or alternatively she could have been at a location that had an archway of flowers and took the opportunity to get nice photos.
Smelling more like a desperate attempt to justify your jelly, kek. It's pretty hilarious that nice photos = THIRSTY FOR APPROVAL!!111!!!!

>>9858174
>you guys are JEALOUS she has money to buy an entire fancy background!!!!
>UM SHE DIDNT BUY IT SHE PROBABLY JUST SAW IT AND TOOK PICS THERE!!!!!!!
Ok

>>9858178
>having reading comprehension this bad
Dont let your jelly fueled rage blind you, how embarrassing

>>9858036
Dang gulls these days, you find the weirdest things to get triggered by. The photo is a solid 6/10, 5/10 if you're picky, nothing about it is in any way notable but also nothing about it is this shitstorm-worthy.
She's standing in what looks like a park or other big open public space; my super wild guess would be that that arrangement was put there for an event like a festival or wedding or whatnot, or just for people to do this very thing - take pictures in it.
I really doubt she rented the whole darn thing just for herself and had it installed in some park. If this was a serious production there wouldn't be really bad cherry tree shoop behind her, probably covering up some ugly buildings.
Leave her be, the way you're shitting yourself over something so insignificant is sad to look at.

>>9858195
This, there's always the same handful of taobao-hating, anti-chinese gulls that lose their minds over average asian girls with decent photos.

>>9857406
Gull, I am 50. And you sound way more grandma then I ever will.

>>9858377

Ngl, that made me a little proud. I can't wait to shake my four wheel walker at everyone when I'm 80.

>>9854242
ew those cheap as fuck amazon socks.

>>9854250
not fond of the underskirt, but I don't think she looks bad. not everyone is a runway model or has the perfect genetics. I think she looks fine, regardless.

>>9854266
this is creepy because the hair looks soccer mom, and the glasses/makeup make it look like a grandma, or mrs. doubtfire, and way way too short/too sheer socks looks too "sexy". No.

>>9854431
kinda cute, but the sheer tights ruin the balance for me.

>>9854432
I mean, at least the hair matches something, otherwise it looks like she put on a bunch of stuff in the dark and hope it worked.

>>9854434
the horrible hair has got to go... while I don't like the coord much, I think without the dreads it would look like babbys first lolita and be okay, I guess.

>>9854661
I think a lot could be solved by a higher camera angle. I am a tall lolita too, and AP is hella short, but I mostly wear oldschool so peeking bloomers work fine for me. but this combined with sheer tights and a super low camera able make this seem like one of those porno sets that start off with fully dressed and get progressively more lewd/porny

>>9854661
>telling someone to wear underskirts with an AP print

gl matching the print and making it look balanced when AP has built in petticoats, I support her. oh no, you saw thigh, get over it.

>>9858472
kek, nice selfpost

>>9857625
That's not mid tigh

>ITT: womanlets who feel insecure about looking like shit in their chinese sissy dresses compared to amazonians

Can we stop bitching about legs girl and post more coordinates please?
Inb4 post them yourself, I'm not on FB.

>>9858619
>amazonians
lol wat
Shorter girls typically look better in lolita. Tall girls can be cute too, unless they're wearing shit that's too short for them.

>>9858003
How does one put a dress on, take a picture, see that their boobs look like this, and think "Perfect, let's post this to Closet of Frills!"?

>>9858619
Go back to /r9k/ dude

>>9858003 Boob Loaf

>>9857611
>160 cm
>thinking the amount of leg she's showing is normal
the only time that should happen is if you're tall or incredibly fat. you're not tall, so you're probably just a fatass

Low key whats with all the narrow mirror coord pictures lately. damn.

>>9858755

>>9858756

>>9858757

>>9858759
I like this although I think I'd rather a different blouse

>>9854795
If you bend over instead of lowering yourself at the knees, you're still not adhering to the lolita modesty bullshit. go suck a cock.

>>9858791
Sitting down still requires you to bend, and with a skirt that short, you'll flash everyone even with that slight bend, dumbfuck.
Stop defending yourself.

>>9858791 I agree with this, don't be another Sissy-Chan!

>>9858377
>50 years old
That’s impressive. Im proud of you anon.

>>9858707
Or maybe it's because most lolita dresses released ever are around 90cm long, and it's not required to wear an underskirt with them

>>9858800
Only if you don't wear bloomers

>>9858810
i mean i'm also 160 cm and my dresses never show that much leg. sorry you're fat

>>9858814
So they hide your knees?

>>9858810
But she isn't lmfao
And a 90cm dress on a 160 cm person is plenty long enough to cover up to your knees, unless you're deformed and have 2 feet long legs with a 3 foot long torso

>>9858854
I guess me and most dutch lolitas are deformed then lol. Maybe I wouldn't hate underskirts so much if you people could pull them off better.

>>9858819
are you blind? look at >>9854661
you can see nearly half her thigh. if that's normal for a 160 cm person then they're fat

>>9858856
i mean it sounds like you don't know how to pull them off either

>>9858856
Most Dutch lolitas never show up to meets, so nobody can know for sure

>>9858759
This would look so much better if she were wearing heels. The flats make her legs look stumpy.

>>9858810
I'm also almost 160cm and I have trouble with dresses looking long on me if I don't use really poofy petticoats, and even then a bad angle makes me look stumpy.

>>9858668
I feel like a big portion of her problem would be solved if she took the ribbon out of the front.

>>9858661
Being a taller girl, I agree with this. if I wear a dress that is too short for me it quickly goes from being cute and lolita to too sexy. which isn't cute, it's sexy.

>>9858008
If your finger fuses with your neck then you used too much shoop

>>9858757
the lighting on this makes me laugh. hello, nose-chan.

>>9858475
>oh no, someone disagreed with me, must be a selfpost!
strike, you're out, come back when you develop a brain

>>9858757
lol girl make up your mind whether you're wearing lolita or cosplaying Saber, mixing the two doesn't seem to be working for you

>>9858917
lmao

>>9858008
The shoop, the scary blush, and the lack of a wig cap are all screaming at me. >>9858475

>>9858757
I actually love OTT armor with lolita but I feel like it actually needs a little more. If you're going to go with such an audacious concept, you kind of need to go all-out.

>>9859000
> being this defensive
kek, selfposters never change

>>9858856
>deformed
well if that’s why you call being morbidly obese, then sure.

>>9858856
>deformed
well if that’s what you call being morbidly obese, then sure.
It’s pretty much physically impossible for a 90cm dress not to hit around your knees at 160 cm height unless you’re fat. You’re literally working with 70 cm of space, 20-30 cm of which will be from your neck to the top of your head, so you’re really only working with 40-50 cm. If your entire leg is only 40-50 cm long, you probably have bigger issues than fitting into lolita.
I’m 162 cm with pretty short legs, and AP hits my knees or goes past them sometimes.

>>9859042
It doesn't hide my knees. you know people also have boobs, shoulders... It's not just 90 cm straight. In any case, I was talking about myself and not the girl whose dress supposedly hits ''mid tigh''.

>>9859033
keep telling yourself that sweetie

>>9856567
I considered them optional until I got my first eyeful of uncovered lolita crotch

>>in a standard lolita 101 panel and when the presenter covered bloomers, she mentioned offhand that she was only wearing tights
>>getting ready to leave after the panel, she's standing a few feet in front of me and leans forward to address a technical issue
>>tights were lacy and hid absolutely nothing
>>bloomers have now become a wardrobe staple for me (especially the ruffley meta ones) and if I absolutely could not wear them for some reason I would at least attempt to match my panties to my coord

>>9859149
I started wearing them because I had to own some for a fashion show, realized how comfy they are and never went back. Also, if you get some that are extra puffy, they can add additional proof to your coord.

>>9859015
I agree with you. I want a bigger pauldron. Huge gauntlet. At least a partial breastplate. And why wear one lolita shoe and armor on the other leg? Armor both jfc.

bigger sword too.

>>9859042
>>9859060
Another 162 cm anon chiming in. Most AP is an inch or two above my knees with the amount of petti I usually wear. My torso is pretty long though. To give you an idea, my inseam is about 68 cm. Cinema doll is one of my longer dresses and it actually reaches my knees, but doesn't cover them, though that's probably because it's pretty poofy (and for the record, I actually like how it looks with an underskirt)

>>9859060
Most of the people are referencing the mid thigh girl. If you show that much leg in a 90 cm dress and you're only 160 cm, you're fat.

>>9858890
I feel like a decent portion would be solved if she even adjusted her tits.

>>9859125
>still confirming even further that you’re selfposting
nice one

>>9859060
Lose weight, fatass.

>noone posted this glorious image yet

>>9859440

>>9859440
>noses melting into face
kek

>>9859441

>>9859443

>>9859442
yes, i'm sure you're very salty

>>9859445
Not everyone is jealous of you, sweetie. Lay off the blurring filter next time so your features don't melt away.

>>9859445

>>9859447


>>9859446
of course you'd think i'm her. i just thought their coords were really nice and wish there was more good gothic in cof

>>9859449

i like the tank pic

>>9859450

>>9859451

>>9859449
Ah sure you did, "totally random anon" who absolutely loves "her" so much that you'll jump immediately to defend "her" feature melting blurring filter. Sure, "random anon", very believable.

>>9859452


>>9859453
I'm laughing, because I'm not her. There's nothing I can do to prove that though, so keep being mad.

>>9859454

>>9859454
>pointing out obviously ott shoop is being mad
ah, never change selfposters, never change.

>>9859455

>>9859458

>>9859457
you're currently being the living embodiment of 'anybody not being derogatory towards someone on cgl must be a selfposter'

>>9859459

>>9859460

>>9859459
>lol that's some heavy blurring there
>U-UH YOU'RE SALTY!!!! JELLY!!!
>I-I'M TOTALLY NOT HER THOUGH!!!
k nice1

>>9859461

>>9859463

>>9859464

anything that screams 'i smoke weed' aint cute imo

>>9859465

I really loved this. the shoes are just a 'meh' to me though

>>9859466

>>9859467
Is that dress supposed to sit like that? It looks soo grumpy and formless on her. Also not a big fan of the glasses. I want to like this but can’t.

>>9859471
i think it might have been built to accommodate a smaller bust. i have a couple dresses that were made for literally flat chests and they sit like this on me, a bit too high up and angled weirdly. the one thing I don't like at all about >>9859467 is that bag, it's just so much like a briefcase

>>9859478
>>9859471
She’s just built like a fridge. I had this dress and it didn’t sit nearly as awkwardly on me. I am not flat chested either. She just doesn’t have much shape to her body for a dress cut like that. Her other posts show she’s got no form to her body in diffrent cuts.

I do agree the bag is killing it more. I also don’t really care for the headress and gloves. Brown shoes would have looked better then white with white socks. Her wig’s bangs also look too far up her head and the weight isn’t balanced because the headress is flat. If this where a bonnet or a wig with more body, the balance would be better.

>>9859442
Mana has a blended nose too. Ultimate EGL face.

>>9859207
You're just deformed or fat

>>9859465
>that shirt
Well, this is bold, at least

>>9859485
I can’t believe I followed that argument all the way up the thread and it was over THAT image.

Fucking OF COURSE styling like that calls for blurring facial features. This anon confirmed for either troll or never heard of EGL before today.

>>9859504
>styling like that calls for blurring facial features
Are you alright anon? Nothing calls for blending your nose into your face, even if Mana does it.

>>9859506
1/10 sage for bad effort

>>9856720
All coslitas are tacky, anon.

>>9859447
I love this.

>>9859440
Thanks to this image I now know for sure I can fit Abilletage tights too

>>9859443
What brand is that dress?

>>9859466
I usually like her coords but this one is a bit meh for me.
The black seems so shoehorned in desu.

>>9859506
You can still see their noses though? I've seen much worse noise blending, this isn't that remarkable.

>>9859465
why do all her photos look like they've been taken with a camera smothered in vaseline?

>>9859553
Shhhh, you're going to trigger that other anon

>>9859467


>>9859546
it's AP

>>9859555
I laughed. I think she just has a really dirty mirror

>>9859559

>>9859465
We get it, you smoke weed.
That coordinate is terrible and so are those bangs and that attempt at being "so funny xD 420 blazeit". No matter how hard you try,you're not cute if you do that.
Also potato camera pics should be banned.

>>9859451
More of a costume than real lolita

>>9859449
Oh honey no

>>9859451
Not lolita.

can we ban people who start screaming self post
cgl is not a hivemind. some people don't give a shit about how short dresses are on tall people and some people like the mana style smoothing. for fucks sake anon chill out.
>inb4 REEEE SELFPOST

>>9859543
Are they actually abilletage or replicas, the left shoes look like replicas so I would think the tights are, too. Plus the color is so faded, I would hope those aren't real

>>9859613
The whole selfpost thing is a tired meme.

>>9859451
>>9859584
>>9859606
apparently the OP is aatp? i'm confused because I've never seen anything like that by the brand..

>>9859619
I have a sneaking suspicion they are both wearing these, or at least the shorter girl. the tights aren't mentioned in the facebook post.

https://www.aliexpress.com/item/Sweet-Lolita-Pantyhose-Victoria-Corset-Printed-Tights-Sexy-Lace-Gothic-Vintage-Pantyhose/32746284360.html

>>9859619
>the left shoes look like replicas so I would think the tights are, too
what kind of logic is that? most people don't care about shoe/design replicas, but tights have prints on them

>>9859646
Are those tights originally from Infanta then or Abitellage? It has the Infanta border.

>>9859649
Abitellage is on the crotch on the real ones.

>>9859440
>tfw no husband to wear matching Moitie coords with
Why even live?

>>9859647
If you can't even buy nice shoes, why would you bother buying real tights? Idk I don't wear gothic, but if I bought expensive tights, I would hope they looked better than that

>>9859721
>real tights 40 USD
>real shoes 180 USD
this is why

>>9859721
Because I'd rather drop 200 dollars on nice leather shoes rather than on cheap shoes that will scuff within three wears? I can also get those cheap shoes for 20 bucks on taobao.

>>9859690
Because I think they're together. Honestly I'd rather have a lesbian lolita gf than a straight ouji bf.

>>9859721
Because expe

>>9859556
Don't selfpost sweetie, it's embarrassing.

>>9859721
>>9859619
Shhh anon, you can't say anything remotely negative about this girl or she'll defend herself to the death.

>>9859842
Did you not get the hint the last time you derailed an entire thread into autosage to shriek like the banshee you are about this nobody? Stop. Just stop. Get some help.

>>9859442
fix the contrast settings of your screen

>>9859553
>>9859860
This. Maybe it's because I'm on a desktop with a huge screen attached, but I see their noses just fine?

>>9859899
Laptop anon here, I can also see their noses just fine.

>>9859852
>last time
kek, this is my first post about this girl
nice to see that you're proving the point by defending yourself though

>>9859899
I can see a faint outline of their noses but they're pretty damn blurred; it's undeniable that they should lighten up on the filter.

Serious question, but why do people even give a shit when girls blur their faces? It's not like face blurring makes their outfit harder to see/worse/automatically ita. I don't shoop, but I really don't why some people get that bothered by it. I thought we were supposed to be discussing outfits, not faces.

>>9859465
A person I know was freaking out over how this could "corrupt minors" in CoF and I want to defend it just because of that. She looks very cute although she could stand to learn how to flip her selfies when they are obviously reversed because of text in frame.

>>9859924
It doesn't really bother me either, but it's pretty sus when Asian girls get their alleged shoop bitched about when they look barely shooped, and then this girl gets white knighted when her shoop is pretty obvious.

>>9859560
This coord is so cute but on this person’s fb page they say they’re a trans man and go by he/him pronouns? I just don’t see why an FTM would still go for a high femme fashion but whatever

>>9859447
Cute, but her legs look absolutely awful. She needs to learn a more flattering pose or wear more flattering socks. How it is now her ankles are nearly the same size as her calves.

>>9859910
To be fair (pun not intended), I'm decently pale and sometimes my nose is lost with harsh lighting or flash photography. Maybe this particular picture isn't the same thing but filters aren't the only thing that do it.

>>9859981
Woah, didn't even notice that until now. Maybe her ankles swell from walking or standing?

>>9859555
>>9859559
My glass screen protectors fog up especially as my phone often gets wet at work.

>>9859584
I wasn't trying to be funny, I just wanted to wear something fitting for the rally/picnic. I don't think one casual outfit a year with one weed reference some had to do a double take to even notice is excessive. Also, my hair is hard to work with and I just tried pigtails for the second time in my life or something and couldn't get the front of my hair to sit in a way that looks ok from all angles. Sorry.

>>9859929
Thankyou. I included only a smaller picture of the flipped shirt because I didn't feel the needn't to emphasise it in larger ones where the focus is on the outfit as a whole or hair/makeup not the 420 BLAZE IT thing. I'll remove the picture if I'm corrupting minors it there aren't an awful lot of posts where people are proud of how drunk they're getting.

I wasn't trying to impress anyone. I have only left the house for a social reason twice so far this year because I'm been in a lot of pain and exhausted from work. I just wanted to share a casual outfit because I finally wore something other than shit covered uniform and steel toe caps for the first time in month and got to see a friend.

I've had to deal with temporary homelessness, my little brother nearly being mauled and the family's puppy getting it instead, another relative being stabbed to death, being separated from my partner, desperately trying to relocate to get away from my abusive dad who gets in the way of me retrieving/packing my stuff which I can only do when he' sees out of the house and on certain days off after working 7 days straight and there's a whole bunch of health shit on top of everything whilst raising my teenage brother, it's hard. I just needed one day to stop thinking about everything and just say fuck it. I wasn't going to an AP tea party.

incoming dump

>>9860000

>>9860001

>>9860002

>>9860005

>>9860007

>>9860008

>>9860010

>>9860012

>>9860014

>>9860012
I like this coord, but I wish she wore different color socks or different color shoes for contrast.

>>9860016

>>9859993
>corrupting minors
I think she's delusional for thinking that in the first place, and we ended up arguing about it. Anyone who thinks weed is somehow more subversive/corruptive than alcohol has either never been around drunk people or has never been around a stoned person. I hope your year gets better and I hope the puppy is ok.

>>9859993
ok but what is the point of the sob story

>>9859543
>>9859619
>>9859649
>>9859681
I think I own both Abilletage tights, but I can't find my black pair to compare. I'm pretty sure they're both wearing their tights backwards. I'm very petite and short and these tights look faded when I wear them too.

I bought mine in-store. The tights come packaged with photos telling you which way is the front and back, and the shop girl was wearing the red pair with the hearts over her calves. "abilletage" is printed over the lower back's waistband. I think they're real, they just wore them backwards because they like the design. They can wear their clothes how ever they want, but I can't help but notice it's backwards.

>>9859984
It's pretty obvious whether it's flash blowing out your features or a blurring filter doing it, though.

>>9859737
>Because I think they're together.
Uh yeah. What did that have to do with my post? Well I hope you find your lesbian lolita gf, but I want a cute brolita bf.

>>9860102
I thought you were asking what reason *they* had to live. I just need to learn to read, carry on.

>>9860007
I find the differing shoes confusing.

>>9860018
I hate everything about this coord. The shiny wrinkled shirt, the loose vest, the short shorts, the normie beret and normie shoes... nothing goes together.

New thread >>9860459

>>9860018
Kinda mediocre/simple but not the worst I've seen desu.

>>9854229