/cgl/ - Cosplay & EGL

first for classic lolita best lolita

>>9777652
>first for gothic lolita best lolita
FTFY

>>9777652
it would be if it wasn't for those ugly florals. gothic and sweet do florals better.

>>9777659
sniff sniff I smell BS

>>9777666
Ehh I'm going to post some floral classic inspo because I love it

>>9777669

>>9777672

>>9777676

>>9777677

>>9777679
I'll stop now, but man I love classic florals

>>9777669
please don't post in the general again

And I posted a strawberry print in with the florals.
Guess it's time to die!

>>9777669
I love it too but that's not what the general is for

>>9777607
Thanks for posting Miho Matsuda anon. I think they need some more love. Was anyone reserving the new shoes they released? I was surprised to see it.

>>9777691
I would love those shoes but my feet are 25cm!

>>9777691
I never got the huge appeal of the strap shoes like this. I guess it's so you can see your printed tights/OTKs through but I really just think the shoes are ugly and make your legs look stubby.

>>9777698
I always thought it was one of those historical children fashion inspired things

>>9777698
Really? I think they only make your leg look stubby if they go really far up the leg. I think they look slimming if they stay at the ankle and are well fit.

>>9777686
Just going off the fact that there's old school dumps all the time that are like 100 posts long. A few posts are alright, and we could all use more classic.

>>9777734
I've never seen those old school dumps you speak of. Even when I post about a new release I only post one picture of the whole dress, and sometimes maybe a close-up.

>>9777739
same

>>9777741

>>9777734
Old school dumps are their own thread, not in the general. If you want to make a thread for appreciation of classic florals, then go ahead.

>>9777734
Those dumps you're talking about almost always have their own thread, and when they don't people complain.

I absolutely love basic stuff. Lolita is usually all about the details but idk sometimes the basics just click with me better. Besides, fewer people ask if you've lost sheep when there's no pattern on your dress.
>>9777653
Agreed, Gothic is the best

>>9777669
Those wristcuffs are triggering me hard, they are just plain horrible. Why would anyone ever do that? Look how cute it looks in its own, it doesn't need wristcuffs.

>>9777855
Is that an Anna Sui umbrella? Girl has good taste.

>mfw friends tells me a couple girls at his school wore lolita for their school photos in high school
>mfw he shows me the pics and they're all ita
>mfw can't decide if i'm disgusted for just feel really bad for them

Am I the only one who thinks the old Haenuli dresses all look like train wrecks? Like, her new stuff is lovely, and even her stuff from like 2015 on looks awesome, but almost everything before that in that album was....not good.

What kind of feeback do you give someone who backs out of the sale because they didn't read the description? Neutral or negative?

>>9777935
I actually think a lot of her newer stuff is samey.

Whipped Cream Kitty was the best and most original.

>>9777938
Negative

>>9777929
Honestly anon lay off, they are high schoolers. They can't possibly afford good stuff. This is a big girl fashion and you should grow up.

>>9777950
I can definitely see what you mean I guess. I’m probably a victim of the Mere Exposure effect desu. And I suppose there can be no progress without experimentation.... but some of her 2008ish era dresses are really rough on the eyes.

>>9777956
he sent me newer photos of them (they're ~22-23) and they're still ita so

>>9777961
You're the one that sounds like a petty ita..

>>9777965
scalding

>>9777845
Somehow sweet looks much more casual to me. Classic pieces are pretty plain, you have to wear a lot of stuff to make it look detailed enough, when sweet things look very fancy right out of the box.

>>9777998
>sweet looks much more casual to me
>sweet things look very fancy right out of the box

>>9777998
Are you implying the OP you posted is in any way plain?

I wonder how the wardrobes of closet child's employees look like. I'd even work there for free desu. Imagine being able to grab new, rare or cheap stock before everyone else.

>>9777855

Some noodle-limbed girls tuck extra wristcuffs into their sleeves to make up for the sleeves being maybe an inch or two too short. It generally looks okay, so long as you don't hold up your hand and ruin the illusion that the wristcuff is connected to the sleeve.

>>9777935
No, but I also think a lot of her newer stuff is ugly too. She has maybe one hit every two years and the rest is awful.

>>9777998
Oh wow she’s busting out of that bodice. Is this why she mostly does floordinates?

>>9778002
Casual means something comfy enough for casual wear, that doesn't make you constantly check if you bonnet sits right in proper way or your bouquet broches are well attached so you don't lose them next moment.

>>9778004
Well, it has a lot of stuff going on, but it's so obvious, like floral pattern, floral laces... Probs, it's just not my thing

>>9778089
But you don’t have to wear bonnets with classic just like you don’t have to wear giant head-eating bows with sweet. I don’t understand what point you’re trying to make.

Gulls I have some old pieces from when I was just starting lolita I'd like to sell. However, I was pretty careless with my clothes back then and they're not in good condition. How do you price items that have stains/discoloration/other damage? I mostly just want them gone at this point, so is doing an auction with a starting price of 1$ a good idea? Would anyone even be interested at all? The pieces are brand, but they're not particularly special or desired.

>>9778110
I can't help you, but I'm in the same boat. I hope we can both figure out what to do with our old dresses, anon.

>>9778110
1$ auctions are best for these items, unless you'd be hurt if it does sell for only 5$.

Did anyone ever pay an invoice from a private seller by using the "pay later" feature? Or did anyone ever receive such a payment?

>>9778131
I have. The seller does not know if you use pay later, they receive their money immediately and normally from Paypal.

>>9778131
It's a credit agreement you have with paypal, so paypal are literally loaning you the money to pay someone else and you pay them back directly.

>>9778084
She has an odd shaped body, not fat by any means but she seems to hold her weight up top.

>>9778167
IW dresses are generally very forgiving in the bust (which is why I own more of their unshirred OPs than any other brand). That dress is unshirred but the bust is 95 cm which is still pretty large.

At first I thought she was getting squished by a tight dress, but after looking at the measurements I wonder if she's simply not wearing a good bra.

>>9778110

Gulls often talk about buying used clothing from Wundervelt, you could look at their account and copy their description and pricing.

With a $1 auction, be prepared if the item does actually sell for $1, especially if your account doesn't have decent feedback, people may think it's a scam and be unwilling to bid more than $1. If you have any social media presence definitely hype up the auction any way you can.

>>9778188
Yeah, this is what I was worried about. I have decent feedback as a buyer, but haven't really sold items at all before. I honestly don't mind if it doesn't sell for much as long as the buyer pays for shipping though, so it might be fine.

>>9778089

It really isn't your thing, so don't try explaining something you don't understand.

>>9778172
But regardless of the overall width, IW bodices are notorious for being tubelike/shallow/cut for a small cup size. That may be part of the problem.

>>9778172
It looks like she's wearing a bra that holds her where it ought to - she's just busty and I don't see a way for her to change where her bust should sit unless she wants a chin rest.

>>9778317
It looks like it's squishing her boobs down towards her tummy. They're not where they should be, not at her age anyway.

>>9778322
A tube bodice will do that even with a good bra. The tissue has to go somewhere. If you ever used a binder, you know what I mean about tissuing getting distributed weirdly. Trust me I was 100cm pre-breast reduction. I knew how to find good bras using the BraThatFits method. Suddenly my IW dresses fit so much better just from sheer size reduction.

>>9778397
Oh wow I didn't think the girl in the dress would be around 100 cm but I guess it's likely. Congrats on the reduction, I'm glad it's been a positive thing for you. If you don't mind sharing, may I ask what size you went down to?

>>9778195
Do broad listings..
Make nicely lit collage pics of the items
describe them in the post, damages et all
Try doing blocks of 6 or so per post
>PICK TWO, your choice, see pictures damages described in listing
Or something similar
With the nicer items you could ask for more, but you'd sell them quick if it's buyers choice at say, 20-30.
If some things refuse to sell, tbrow them into orders as gifts.

>>9778172
I know her irl and she is not even near the 100 cm bust. This picture is from two years ago (she wore this for SFE in Amsterdam) so she has lost weight since then or wore the wrong bra.

>be me
>97 cm bust
>accept most brand blouses won't fit me besides some AP and Meta
>casually seeing some last year brand blouses for sale
>check measurements even though expect to be disappointed
>oh shit AP's been making a lot of bust friendly blouses recently
>they're not even ugly full-shirred things I'm used to
>mfw I'm part of the problem not buying directly from brands even after they cater to me
This year I'm getting some brand blouses, gotta support them.

>>9778552
Please do support the brands, anon. It's not a bad decision as long as you manage your budget properly; plus, buying directly from the brands is fun imo.

>>9778554
I have bought a few dresses direct from AP and BTSSB before. I just had no idea AP was making so many roomier blouses. I feel terrible and yeah, when they release their summer blouses I'll definitely go for some this year.

>>9778557
I honestly just wish they'd make sizes like IW. And longer sleeve lengths like they used to.

Why did lace a la mode stop blogging?

>>9777741
No1curr

>baby: elitist princess bitch. very extra. everyone else is a peasant.

>meta: playful, experimental girl who likes to have fun.

>innocent world: likes to go on walks in the forest, does picnics & shit. greets neighbors every morning.

>victorian maiden: high-status, very esteemed lady. graduated at top of etiquette class.

>mary magdalene: quiet, highly intelligent girl. likes books & botanical gardens.

>rpa: annoying classmate who is late to every joke. laughs really hard after it stops being funny.

>jane marple: likes reading magazines. knows everyone's secrets.

>etc: absent-minded & does whatever the fuck she wants. listens to obscure stuff like mitski.

>angelic pretty: kind of a whore. wants everyone to like her, will do anything to get your approval.

AP's my favorite brand.

Does anybody here own any wigs from Dreamholic? I'm thinking of getting the hime cut and the Emil Milly. How's the quality? Are they really shiny IRL? I hate unrealistically shiny wigs. Also, how long do they take to ship?

>>9779135
I swear I see this question pop up twice a day.
Not shiny at all. Thick, rougher fibers. Prone to tangling. Easy to style.

>>9779131
Bodyline: Confused weeb who probably still has a Naruto headband in their room.
JetJ: It's fashion Brenda look it up.

>>9779131
rpa should be: classmate who always asks to copy your homework

>>9779131
You sound biased towards classic

>>9779157
>AP's my favorite brand.

>>9779160
So you're kind of a whore?

Will someone please explain wtf this week's IW newsletter announcement means? New label debut?

Innocent World 誕生20周年を記念し

「お嬢様の普段着」をテーマにした新レーベルがデビューすることとなりました。

詳細は、2月9日(金)オフィシャルのホームページにて発表します。


お楽しみに

-----------------------

To celebrate the Innocent World birth 20 anniversary

The new label was the "young lady of casual," the theme is now decided to debut.

For more information, it will be announced in the February 9 (gold) official website.


Look forward to

>>9779177
Maybe it's like AP's lavender label in a way? Like IW is going to release stuff they specifically categorize as casual, or something. I'm not entirely sure what it means, to be honest, but it sounds interesting.

>>9779162
Learn to take a joke, anon.

>>9779180
Hey I'm not the one who called themselves a whore.

>>9777956
this is bullshit, I was buying second hand brand and indies when I was 15-16 with no income
people who use poorness as an excuse are either literally impoverished and have no business trying to enter a luxury hobby, impatient and stupid, or have fallen into the tumblr 'oh woe is me I'll be called an ita if I don't wear a 300 dollar dress' meme

>>9779177
people are hypothesising it's just a new series, but it reads like a new label/sublabel to me. but we're all gaijins who don't speak nihongo here so we won't know until someone's around to clarify

>>9779183
Neither am I, I'm not the original poster.

>>9779184
>>9779179
Yeah, I guess I'll just have to be patient until Friday. I'm hoping that "casual" is going to translate to easy to wear solids.

>>9779191
That's why I'm curious, because IW already do release easy to wear solids. I mean, how much more casual can their designs get? Or maybe we'll just have more designs like pic related in a category of their own that's separate from the fancy/printed items. I'm excited for it if that's what it means, IW's solids are amazing staples for daily wear.

>>9779195
Yeah, I am a complete whore for their solids. Or I wonder if it'll be like cutsews/cutsew material OPs/parkas and the like. I certainly wouldn't mind owning another parka from IW.

>>9779092
love this, hate the cuts. Fuck you AP why can't you make one empire waist cut and one normal waist cut in your releases?

>inb4 "you must look bad in empire waist cuts, you must be obese"
yeah, of course, that's why I dislike them. I also think everyone looks bad in them. And not a fatty-chan.

>>9779243
No one cares what you look like in anything

>>9779248
Nah whenever i see someone saying they don't like a certain cut, the argument is always that the poster must look like shit in them or be fat.

But way to miss the point, I was complaining about their cuts.

>>9778009
A lot of secondhand shops in the states have rules against employees snapping up the good stuff, so they might too. Although that's easy to work around if you have a friend

>>9779243
I hate empire waists too, they make everybody look fat and look weird with a petticoat to me.

>>9779269
Empire waists always make me think of the nightgowns Lucy would wear on I Love Lucy. I can see how a flowy empire waste would make for cute sleepwear but I really don't need to be walking around looking like someone cut my midriff and sewed my hips to my chest.

What's wonderfinch's social media?

>>9779280
@wonderfinch

>>9779243
>>9779259
>>9779269
>>9779274
>.t fatties in denial
Ever think maybe AP doesn't want you in their clothes?

>>9779135
My Dreamholic experience was terrible. Took forever to ship, and the wig looked nothing like the photo. It was thick on top, but the ends were very thin and tangled very easily. The wig was also very large on my head, even after adjusting, although that may benefit some.

>>9779243
I love empire waists, I feel like regular cuts makes me look short and stubby.

>>9779289
Enjoy looking like a pregnant hot air balloon in all their awful empire waist cuts and pretending that you don't, then.
But that's your business.

>>9779301
I look cute in them because I'm not a fat fuck with man shoulders. You should try it.

>>9779289
I'm 96 pounds dude, they just look weird in general. Not to say no one can pull them off, but tailored waists look better on most people, and it would be nice to at least have the option. You seem quick to call people fat, ana-chan.

>>9779184
>Proud of buying stuff with no income

You were using your parents money. That's nothing to be proud of.

>>9779243
This has been my issue with so many of their releases I didn't buy anything from AP last year.

>>9779289
>63cm waist
>fat

k.

>>9779368
Nice rp

>>9779306
Nayrt, I look okay in high waist cuts but natural waist cuts are a lot more flattering on me and more comfortable to wear, too. It's perfectly valid to prefer one cut over another and be upset that the cut you prefer has been cast aside by the brand you love.

>>9779317
>96lbs
>Calling other people ana-chan

>>9779162
I'm definitely a whore.

>>9779388
I'm very short

>>9779259
Oh so because of the fatty meme around here you think it vital to point out how not fat you are?
You clearly give a shit what us other anons think of you. I was just letting you know.

>>9779092
I don't think this looks bad at all... the cuts at least, the print isn't my cup of tea. There have been high waist cuts that look awful, and sack dresses look bad pretty often too, but these are nice imo. The details are cute too.

>>9779177
>普段着
>casual wear; ordinary clothes; everyday clothes; home wear
Just look it up on jisho anon.

>>9779092
Neither of these look like empire waist. The look higher than just waist, yes. But I can't see them as empire unless your boobs are so huge they take up the entire bodice.

>>9779177
>>9779441
There is no excuse for people not doing the legwork (i.e. google translating and then applying some basic critical thinking skills) for this shit themselves.

I seriously wonder about people's intelligence in this fashion... It should not be hard for anyone to parse out brand messages; they're usually very basic and only use common terms. If you're not already using google translate and rikaikun/chan, you're just fucking lazy.

>>9777666
fuck I want this bustier so badly.
VM is best

>>9779131
>girl who is late to every joke. laughs really hard after it stops being funny
this is my type desu

>>9779177
Something like Beth. They're taking advantage of the situation.

>>9779577
I'm fine with this desu. More reasons to throw money at Fujiwara is fine in my book.

>>9779449
>unless your boobs are so huge [/fat] they take up the entire bodice
So you mean like 75% of AP’s Western customer base

>>9779449
>your boobs are so huge they take up the entire bodice.
i really think this is their issue with high-waist cuts. it's kind of funny so many gulls hate the most common cut in lolita.

>>9779582
>the most common cut in lolita
I don't know if it's the most common as it is what's trendy in sweet lolita. The most common cut in lolita, the standard even, is the natural waist cut.

>>9779586
high-waist cuts are the most common compared to low waist, mid waist, skirt etc. and i'm pretty sure it's not a trend

>>9779586
nvm i just looked up what you mean by natural waist. for me ap cuts like the lavender jsk are at my natural waist.

>>9779582
The iconic lolita silhouette is a bell shaped skirt flaring our from the natural waist. One brand trying a different cut for a few years doesn’t suddenly make that the most common. Brands other than AP exist, remember?

>>9779598
i already said nvm but you can't convince me that skirts are the most common cut

>>9779603
I wasn’t replying to you and I wasn’t talking only about skirts, just the skirt portion of a dress. Go to bed, anon.

>>9779131
>ETC: listens to Mitski
can confirm

>>9779606
it's so weird that you call that part a skirt, one of the weirdest things i've learned about english so far

>>9779614
Nayrt, I don't know if English is your second language but dresses typically have a bodice and skirt portion.

>>9779451
>I seriously wonder about people's intelligence in this fashion
There are a lot of dumb people everywhere. Normies with really good jobs can be retarded about simple things like wearing clothes in the right size. I sometimes think ''wow, people on rufflechat/cgl are sooo dumb and lazy'' but then I look at other websites and realize it's normal.

>>9777743
I'm honestly in love.

>>9779131
I wear Baby but i'm definitely more of a meta and etc girl

>>9779620
Fine then, people in general. IMO if you can't learn the basic terms (or at least develop basic research skills) needed to participate in a hobby, you're either a poseur/wannabe or plain stupid, both of which make you insufferable.
You don't even need to learn Japanese or whatever, just learn how to use the myriad of tools at your disposal and your brain. I guess the latter proves problematic for some people.

Does anyone have recommendations on where to find some cutsew/tees that could be worked into a very casual pink/lavender coord? Might be using black as a third color so that's an option too.

>>9779680
Maxicimam

>>9779131

For the goths

>MmM: utterly impeccable. You’ve got your act together but at a high risk of cult abduction.

>boz: your outfits are neatly poised in regimental order. Less so your internal schedule. You pretend to be a rear admiral.

>h.naoto: wants to be a bitch but sees a cute animal and breaks down.

>AatP: you go hard as FUCK for Halloween. Will correct your spelling and pronunciation of “theatre”

>Antique BeasT: probably a hoarder or collector, the type to attempt wine pairings with everything you eat

>putumayo: just barely got out of you rawr XD~ phase. Friendly and eccentric, and determined to make punk lolita work

>>9779289
>AP hates fatties
>looks at modern AP sizing

How many dresses can you gulls think of that has half shirring but no zipper? I can only think of a handful of them with most being lucky pack dresses.

>pic related
>big boobs, small waist makes one hate shitty zippers
>fuck invisible zippers in particular

>>9779662
Most smart people are enormously lazy because they live their lives coasting on their smarts of a given type. If something is available on a golden platter (piles of lolitas in cgl) then why bother getting an accurate translation when you’re not even good at it?

Smart people are also self conscious about things they aren’t good at, so why fumble with moonrunes when there’s probably someone here who’s taken JAPN 201.

That said does it invalidate anything you said? No, I agree on principle. But... they’re probably just lazy.

>>9779809
I hate those dresses and I have like 3 of them. I'm going to mod in a lapped zip, why on Earth do you like them? Although Baby's invisible zippers are a pain, I can agree.

>>9779802
>makes dresses that technically can fit fatter people
>make cuts unflattering as hell on them
>why aren't they buying our dresses?
AP should pick a side already, I'm sure their smol Asian fanbase can't be too happy with their current sizing either.

Is there etiquette/norms for wearing jfashion to anime conventions? I want to wear it out of the house but I'm not part of a comm yet. I've seen people wear lolita to cons but they're usually in groups. I didn't know if it'd be tacky to wear it alone.

>>9779824
I’ve worn it alone and then meet up with my lolita and non lolita friend groups. This is kind of a pass to go OTT but try to avoid cosplay elements. If anyone asks what cosplay it is briefly explain its lolita fashion.

I’m part of a comm but I don’t go out with them much, so I just wear it when I feel like it. I started at cons because it was a safe place to dress weird but I encourage you to wear t on any occasion: work if it’s allowed, to the stores, on a nice walk, café brunch.

>>9779819
I mean some cuts flatter fat folks, some don’t. I think that’s fine.

>>9779817
I just find them more comfortable to put on. I have a 16 inch difference between my waist and bust and it makes trying to zip up anything a bit frustrating. It's especially bad with BTSBB invisible zippers but those are garbage regardless of one's measurements.

I would buy more full shirring pieces but I really don't like how they look on me.

>>9779894
Interesting. I find them a pain to put on as I have to either go over my head and screw up my hair and possibly hit my makeup or step in and finagle my blouse back into position and attempt to button the straps back down. I have Twinkle Sky, Lucky Key, Loyal Rosette and SDD, and I hate that about them. That's why most dresses have the hook and eye though anon. To help you zip them up.

>>9779824
I always go with a group of friends or my bf. When you go out alone, especially if you go out alone to eat, randos might try to spark up a conversation with you because you're alone at a restaurant.
I've worn casual to shops and stuff by myself and people are usually busy doing their own thing and they might take a look at you and then go back to doing their own thing.

>>9779824
It's fine to wear it alone. It also makes it easier to talk to other lolitas at cons, even if you don't know them. You can just compliment their coord or ask where they got something or if they're going to any lolita panels or whatever.

>>9779800
Thanks anon, was not familiar with gothic brands.

10/10 laughed at hnaoto.

Currently dredging through the archives and could not find it on lolibrary.

Can someone please tell me the cuff measurements of the misty sky grey release?

>>9779909
>hook and eye help you zip up
I can never fucking do it with one hand and always have to ask for help. When I'm alone I just pull it over my head zipped up and do my hair after.

I really don't get why some find it so easy to put these dresses on unless they are the kind you don't have to zip up.

>>9779987
Why are you using only one hand? You use one hand to straighten the zip and the other to zip it up.

>>9780007
I mean when I have it on- I can not get the hook and eye clasp to connect.

Zipper and clasp is on my left side. I reach over with my right hand to attempt to clasp the hook and eye together. Can't use my left hand as it doesnt reach to my left armpit area.

How are you doing it?

>>9779824
I wear lolita alone to university every day. Who fucking cares what you wear?
Do. You. Boo boo.

>>9779131
>>9779162
Can you really call yourself a fan of Angelic Pretty if you ain't a (brand)whore?
>source: I'm a slut too.

>>9779800
MmM is also definitely secretly a little chuuni.

>>9779909
They are a pain to put on, agreed, but far less of a pain that fighting with a hook and eye. When you have a sizable measurement difference from waist to bust, especially if the shirring is tight similar to how older AP and IW pieces are, it's a struggle.

>>9779987
>>9780007
When I zip my dresses up, I have to have one hand holding near the hook and eye and one hand holding the bottom down. My boyfriend zips me up lol.

>>9779987
The zippers are shit, I always end up catching the zipper on my blouse.

>>9780023
My hand can reach my arm pit area.

>>9780026
Have you tried loosening the shirring lacing? It sounds like you have it tied too tight.

>>9777691
anon where did you find this? I'm barely getting into Miho Matsuda and I've been trying to look for more info about their shoe release!

>>9777666
I just came in my pants and I don't even like florals

>>9780041
I get the same issue and I usually take out the lacing. It’s just because the shirring naturally tries to be unstretched so it creates that gap, which zippers struggle with.

>>9779135
don't buy from their storenvy, all the bad feedback comes from people who bought from there. Get an ss and buy from their Taobao store, I bought 5 wigs and intend to buy more, never had any problems with the purchases or the wigs. A ton of people looking up close have thought it's real hair even with very unnatural colors. Honestly right now it's my favorite wig brand

>>9780061
Check their Twitter anon! I think it might have closed by now, but I'm not sure. Email them to ask on the English site, they are super helpful!

>>9780069
Yes, but it shouldn't be that big that you're destroying the zipper trying to get it on.

>>9780090
Oh wait nevermind. It's tomorrow!
>https://twitter.com/mihosaka/status/961438351835348992

>>9779662
Sorry to interject your angry circlejerking here but I did look up the translation, Google only gave me "casual clothes"; maybe my perspective is wonky because I wear lolita daily so many of IW's simpler pieces are perfect as casual clothes, so I was a bit confused about their intent, but that doesn't mean I was being lazy.

>>9780041
>My hand can reach my arm pit area
I just tried it now that I'm not in public and I can reach my armpit but I can't see past my shoulder so I'm just grabbing at tiny clasps with my finger tips and getting nothing accomplished.

Whatever. My boyfriend always does it and when hes not around I don't care about doing my hair after I put on my dress.

>>9779809
Quite a few if you're into Meta, otherwise AP/IW/BtSSB don't tend to go for actual half shirring, mostly quarter shirring with zipper.I don't really like it though as I feel it doesn't fit as well on me compared to quarter shirring.

>>9779809

Actually, AP and Baby make them quite often, but usually on high-waisted dresses, which probably won't be boob-friendly. Eternal Carnival (regular release) is the only one that's low-waist and has no zipper, but the waist itself is quite small even with shirring so you might want to avoid it (there's no zipper, so you'll have to squeeze your boobs past the small waist).

For actual recommendations. Try Enchantlic Enchantilly. They're a lot more generous with their fabric, so even if you don't like the way the fully shirred dresses look you can still take them to a tailor's and there is enough fabric to have them make a fitted front and a shirred back for you. Their jsks have all been half-shirred, though there's only like 3 or 5 so far.

>>9780147


Just ignore them, I don't believe they didn't see the translation in the same post, or the 2-3 posts following the original, discussing how IW is already pretty casual lolita. Sounds more like they're baiting.

Friday's tomorrow and I'm really curious to see what IW puts out. A lot of IW solids are pretty casual by lolita standards but still Amish kei by normie standards, so I think they do actually have a lot of wiggle room. I'm bailing if the skirt gets too short or non-poofy, though.

>>9780104


Just ignore them, I don't believe they didn't see the translation in the same post, or the 2-3 posts following the original, discussing how IW is already pretty casual lolita. Sounds more like they're baiting.

Friday's tomorrow and I'm really curious to see what IW puts out. A lot of IW solids are pretty casual by lolita standards but still Amish kei by normie standards, so I think they do actually have a lot of wiggle room. I'm bailing if the skirt gets too short or non-poofy, though.

>>9780173
Yeah not sure what their damage is, I obviously pasted the google translation-- I just wanted to know other people's take? Or maybe an anon had more specific insight on specific translations of words that would clarify if it's like a subbrand, or a series or something idk.

>>9780075
How long does their taobao take to ship? I'm looking to get something by mid-March.

>>9780186

I'm glad you posted it, I glossed over it thinking it's another new print and would have totally missed it completely.

As for the translation, the only thing I saw wrong is translating Friday as (gold), but that really adds nothing to the discussion. Original Japanese does directly call it a new label (新レーベル), but I really don't know if that word means the same in Japan.

>>9780191
It doesn't usually take long for them to ship to an SS but CNY might cause issues.

>>9779819
To be fair it’s almost impossible to make fat people look good.

>>9777998
my dream dress

Talking about fat, what's gulls' consensus about borderline of fatness? What's the maximal weight/size you may have before people start considering you as fatty-chan

>>9780023
Do you have some kind of mobility issue? Most people have no problem reaching their left armpit with their left hand, which is why these kind of closures are so common in the first place.

>>9780237
If you can’t fit Baby or IW size L you’re fat. If you can’t fit shirred AP or Meta you’re obese.

>>9780248
I can reach it but I can't see what I'm doing.

I actually mentioned this in another comment.
>>9780120

>>9779577
Good.

>>9780255
That’s weird.

>>9779869
This just looks like a really shitty kakeguri cosplay.

>>9779432
When your only argument is 'hurrrrr u must be fat' then sure, people are going to preemptively correct you. Keep proving everyone right though, you really don't have another argument. People are allowed to dislike something you like.

>>9779800
>Atelier Pierrot: likes to think they're open to new things. In reality does the same shit all the time and is a bit of a shut in.

Any opinions on the new Baby Ponytail "Masquerade Ballet" Dresses? What colourway is best, etc.
I personally love the blue with the transparant skirt pictured above.

>>9780343
Selfpost? This looks taobao quality at best.

>>9780173
I'm not baiting. I just don't get how you can read that translation, where it clearly says a new casual label will be announced, and still need someone to hold your hand and give it to you word for word.

So many people in this fashion need to be spoonfed or get their information NOW.
If you're really so desperate, learn Japanese or some basic critical thinking skills.

Dumbass question alert:
Besides ironing, does steaming a dress work? IE: hanging the dress on the opposite side of the shower curtain during a hot ass shower.

>>9780343
>>9780346
I had to look it up because I assumed Baby Ponytail was a Taobao brand (the name doesn't help), but it turns out they're British. It does look exactly like something from Taobao, though. Do they get their fabric printed and pieces sewn in China?

>>9780348
You need to use an actual steamer, it exists for a reason

>>9780350

Someone said the dresses actually ship from Hong Kong, and that they're pretty meh-tier. It sounds to me like someone living in (or "residing", as in "frequently visits") UK but is mainlander Chinese and gets their dresses printed and made with the same factories that make taobao lolita dresses.

This was way back in 2014, 2015 when they were posting borderline ita-tier coords to tumblr and facebook though (both accounts are deleted now).

Speaking of taobao, what are some of the better brands to buy from? How is Krad Lanrete quality-wise?

>>9780327
>People are allowed to dislike something you like.
What are you even talking about? This isn't about that.

This is about some anon being hyper defensive about being thin because god forbid someone call her fat. That would be the end of the world.

>>9780350
>>9780361
I was scrolling through WunderWelt's new stock and this dress was up for reservation. Honestly, I'd never heard of this brand before today (which is why I posted here) but I really like the design for this particular dress. I scrolled through their site and the dresses look pretty OK, especially for the price.

>>9780370
Nayrt but it does start to get annoying when rather than having actual discussion about a topic triggered anons who disagree with your opinions just start screaming fat to get you to shut up every single time the topic gets brought up. Then again this is 4chan.

>>9780377
I agree but anon was just taking a moment to talk about herself and I find that more annoying.

>>9780371
what is anatomy

>>9780348
No, you need a steamer, or if you are very careful you can do what I do and use bursts of steam from an iron with a steam function to iron ruffles and lace on cotton. Just watch your fingers.

>>9780347
Well maybe it is dumb to immediately assume that "casual clothes" means "casual lolita", I admitted my perspective was wonky, but you seem way, way too mad about this. No one is asking to be spoonfed, just speculating and thinking "out loud". We're allowed to discuss things, even if you think it's stupid or pointless. It's really not a big deal.

Hey you know who is beautiful read the first word.

>>9780026
agreed, there's stuff in my closet that I can fit into (and not look stuffed into) but I can't do up by myself. If the design doesn't allow me to pull it over my head I need someone to help or I just can't wear it. Tits are hell.

>>9780380
>random anon points out they don't like a specific thing, mentions size to avoid argument
HURR TIME TO CAUSE AN ENTIRE ARGUMENT ABOUT SIZE. AND I HATE YOU BECAUSE YOU REFERRED TO YOURSELF.

Anon, you sound crazy. Have you taken your meds today?

>>9780631
You could have let this subject die.

>>9780237
Anyone over 135lbs. If you are above 5'8" this rises to 145.

>>9780092
It’s an issue with the shirring that’s all. I can fit into unshirred stuff but it’s just the way some dresses are patterned.

>>9780665
Have you looked at the seams of the zipper while you have it zipped up? They should still be covered with fabric and should lie straight. You shouldn't be able to see visible threads from the seam where the zipper is sewn.

>>9780659
this is why girls have such a hard time.
they subscribe to numbers instead of figuring out what's best for their bodies.
depending on genetics and racial background, you can be trim but hold weight in thighs, boobs, and ass.

all that matters, health wise, is that you are not carrying too much weight around your middle. it's very bad for your organs.

>>9780237
Anyone who can't fit size M or S

>>9780686
t. fatty

>>9780686
Using logic here just leads to frustration

>>9780727
M is fat too.

>>9780767
US M is pretty fat. JP M not so much

>>9780590
'Hey'..?

>>9780409
She's sitting backwards on the horse. Clamp proportions.

>>9780659
100 lbs at 5 ft and +5 lbs for each extra inch is the optimal weight imo

>>9780788
>hownu.ru

>>9780686
I know that east asain people are generally smaller, but who is larger? Besides americans.

Ana-chans, Ana-chans everywhere. Fat is when you're unhealthy. Too fat for lolita, on the other hand, is when you look bad and are overstretching shirring.

>>9780841
People can have higher standards with you without being anorexic you fat fuck.

>>9780835
anon was talking about racial backgrounds, not necessarily about being bigger, just carrying weight in different places.

Too fat for lolita IS unhealthy. Burando dresses are pretty fucking roomy and forgiving.

>>9780631
You're mistaken.

Gulls don't have worth while lives to listen to. Most people here have nothing worth of value to add.

So yeah. Shut up random anon. Stop talking about how not fat you are to compensate for how average you are.

>>9780361
Completely OT but my hair is almost exactly like this girl's (both in texture/length) how the hell do I get it to behave instead of turning into the tangled mess we see here.

>>9777691
>>9777692
Anon, they added the XL size for 25.0-25.5cm!

>>9780996
>Most people here have nothing worth of value to add
including you, then? why would anyone have to listen to you

>>9780371

It doesn't look great quality to begin with, you can see the ribbons are one-sided satin since one bow tail is helpfully flipped and looks greyer on the other side, I wouldn't be surprised if the ribbons actually look even cheaper in person. The gold trim is way too yellow, too. they make the gold earring she's wearing look beige. Imo it's these careless taobao-tier details that will make the dress a pain to actually wear well.

Both are easily fixed if you're willing to spend money taking it to a tailor's, I suppose. I don't know that I have a lot of faith in the fabric quality considering the trim, and again I wouldn't be surprised to find this photo had been shooped to heck and back so buyers find the dress appealing. But if you really like it that much, just get the dress and get the trim replaced.

>>9781004

Cut it short and do rebonding (at a hair salon).

Have a friend with hair texture like this and that's what she did. There's no point having long hair unless you can also show off how sleek and shiny and well-behaved it is. If it's just long and frizzy like this it just looks like you don't take of yourself and haven't heard of hair salons where professional people help you take care of your hair.

Welp the Meta sale is incredibly lame. Don't know what I expected.

Never before have my hopes soared and crashed this rapidly.

>>9781319
Looks like she mopped the floor with it. I don't understand why people still waste their money on shitty replicas.

So, a seller marked my address wrong, which caused the package to be sent to my country but has now been sent back to hers.
She seems pretty snarky about the whole thing in the pms that we've had, even though it's her fault. I'd be sad to just let the dress go, but I wouldn't mind as long as she gives me a full refund including shipping. Is this too much to ask?

Or on the other hand, should I get her to re-ship it again? I do want the dress but I don't want to pay for shipping, as I don't think I should pay double for something she messed up on. Would that be asking too much as well? I've never had a postal issue this bad before.

>>9781335
Its her fault, she should have to pay to re-ship it.

>>9781335
She should pay to re-ship or give a complete refund. I wouldn't be quick to judge people on their tone if English is not her first language,maybe one of my friends hardly makes mistakes but sounds like a 12 year old online.

>>9781335
That's so annoying, anon. She should definitely pay to reship.

Damn, I liked Fururun, there were some great deals.

VM added more stock for their 20th anniversary event.

>>9781319
Report it. They're not allowed.

>>9781383
At least they didn't close down

>>9781335
BtSSB did this to me once. They blamed me and said I wrote my own address wrong, even though it was correct in their confirmation email. I ended up paying shipping a second time because I didn’t want to get blacklisted.

>>9781409
True, but I miss checking it every Thursday

What's a good price for this cut of Musee du Chocolat in ivory or brown?

>>9781383
>>9781409
Hopefully they come back. I've been a big fan of fururun since about 2012; I bought my first AP jsk from them.

>>9781383
Damn. So, short story about a recent thing with them. I had ordered a dress, and it took them ages to get back so I asked to cancel it. They shipped the dress anyway without me ever paying. For the record, I DID end up paying once it got sent, but I was really wondering wtf was going on. Makes me sad they need a break, but obviously it's probably for the best right now.

sometimes I remember there are old lolita pieces that I've never seen before, and it makes me both happy and sad

>>9781836
>that fucking flocked Annunciation print on slubbed fabric

This is the most beautiful thing I have seen and I hate you because now I know it exists and I will probably never have it

>>9781839
At least if you ever find it, it'll probably be cheap. When it comes to Moitie it's the unpopular stuff that's hard to get.

is it morally wrong to keep a non-refundable deposit when the buyer backs out of a payment plan due to family emergencies?

>>9781892
No because they can easily lie about it. Everyone always says they had an emergency. In business it doesn’t matter, non refundable means that.

>>9781892
Ask them if they're still interested in the dress and would like to purchase it at a later date, if you feel bad - you can just hold on to it until they pay up.

New Scarfing Scarves
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Usw904jGCUA

>>9781836
What is this?

>>9781903
Moitie

>>9781892
no if it was clearly stated in your term of sales the deposit was non refundable. theres no point in making it non refundable if you're going to refund them...

>>9781902
Omfg when will she already fucking stop.

LWLN was good but now I am just so sick of her every single video being about John Leigh and "boohoo I am victim".

We freaking get it and I'm not watching her stupid segments anymore for at least 6 months.

>>9781919
She kind of had to explain what happened after the video take down blew up (again). It sucks but it's not really a surprise that it's a good chunk of this video.

Hopefully she gets back to what her first videos were like after this.

Is AP USA down or is it just me?

>>9781927
Down for me as well.

>>9780835
anglo saxons, polynesians, some africans, i'd say latinas often? they could just be a cultural thing though, as is the case for anglo-saxons, we might just be genetically taller and perhaps wider hipped but there's no reason for us to be so fat. polynesians are genetically fucking huge though, in both build and weight.

Hey, did anyone received email from IW regarding lotta jsk?

>check the item description and says blue×pink.
>almost cry because i wanted get blue one not pink
>go to website and blue is blue×pink and pink is pink×pink
>yes I am an idiot

>>9781399
Got the ivory one. Sort of relieved that it didn't go as quickly this time around? But it looks like bordeaux already filled up.

I'm waiting on the survey with a mix of trepidation for my wallet but overall excitement.

>>9781977
Yes, I replied the minute I got it. Dream dress! So happy to get it new.

>>9781997
>dream dress
>pops up all the time for same price as retail
Can you really call it a dream dress if you never really tried to get it before now?

>>9782049
Nayrt but they could be new to lolita.

>>9782049
Some of us don't like to buy used dresses anon.

>>9782057
There was a NWT one sitting on LM for like 2 months.
I don't know if it's still there.

>>9782054 is the only exception.

>>9780849
nah there's some comments that go against recommended height/weight charts in here.. so many ana-chans

>>9782106
>recommended height/weight charts
>recommended by fat whities
nice try whalelord

>>9779177
IW's announcement went up:

To commemorate the 20th anniversary of Innocent World,
Designer Yumi Fujiwara will launch a new label.

The design concept is "Lady's casual wear"
We propose a style that is simple but elegant cuteness overflows.

Easy to have for commuting and school attendance, simple design features.
The material is less likely to wrinkle, mainly polyester is easy to clean.
In addition, there are many plain items that are easy to coordinate with your existing clothes.

The announcement and reservation of goods are scheduled from the end of February to the beginning of March.

Please look forward to it
----------------

Sounds like we might be getting more of this >>9779195

>>9782113
>just as I got my new job
Bless Fujiwara-san

>>9781836
Why the fuck did you remind me that I'll never own this

secretsss

Speaking of casual clothes. A lot of girls in my comm love old-school lolita because it's more casual/simple looking. Shorter skirts and JSKs that only fit a short, thin petticoat are accepted in old school lolita as long as it's from the right brand and time. But how come when brands release more casual stuff nowadays, people argue that it's not lolita at all?

>>9782128
I've seen different Moitie pieces with that print go for really cheap

>>9782160
It depends on what it is. Mini skirts and salopettes are often the subject of these arguments because they don't subscribe to the "standard" lolita silhouette, so people argue that they're meant for fairy kei/girly style rather than lolita.
Old school designs that need thin petticoats are accepted because they're "classic" designs that were around when the fashion began, plus a dress doesn't have to have three stacked cupcake petticoats worth of poof to count as lolita.

Can you point out a recent release that isn't a mini skirt or salopette that people argue isn't lolita?
If it's something like IW's simple releases (re: >>9779195), the argument might stem from girls' off perspectives; it's not exclusive to newbies either, some people are so used to see OTT printed pieces that anything less is "boring" and "barely lolita" to them, which is messed up imo but I digress.

>>9782168
>Can you point out a recent release that isn't a mini skirt or salopette that people argue isn't lolita?
I don't agree that salopettes can't be lolita. I feel like people are using a different set of rules for old-school for no viable reason. I think brands like AP wouldn't intentionally release many things that are not lolita. The short skirts is just an example, I also see the same thing happen for some sack dresses, cutsew dresses, showing skin, amount of accessories, hair and makeup. I get old-school has a different aesthetic but I don't get why people are putting more limitations on lolita now.

>>9782178
I don't think it's people applying stricter limits on the fashion as it is people hanging onto what they see as the familiar form of lolita. I don't know if it's out of nostalgia, a fear of change or something else, but I can understand it; if you've been around for a while and got a set idea of what lolita is, it can be jarring to see the brands straying from what you perceive as the standard.
I'm not saying that thinking this way is a good or bad thing, just pointing out that this way of thinking exists and it may be the reason why people reject certain designs and disregard them as not being lolita.

>>9782178
>I don't get why people are putting more limitations on lolita now.
It's not a now thing. Western people and online comms have always had strict ideas about what is and isn't lolita unless they're the weeby hugbox tween groups. To begin with it was due to the number of literal cosplays and ita trash that made up the majority of what people were calling "lolita" that triggered "the rules" - and shit, back in the day there was a debate about whether striped socks of all things were lolita on egl. Painting dresses, tea length, wearing tights... all these things have been previously decried as "not very lolita" at times. Only certain types of old school get accepted now to be honest - basically you need to look like a model snap and still have the more matchy vibe of today's coords, the actual "lolita outfits" that you saw back in the day would probably be torn to shreds now or nitpicked to death.

>>9782179
>>9782196
I appreciate your insight. I know it doesn't mean much to say this on cgl but I started wearing lolita over 10 years ago. I took a break, and now that I'm back old-school is much more popular in my comm, so I just never thought about the different standards before. I was always on the "if the brand designer considers it lolita, it's lolita" side of the discussions.

Does anyone know the story behind this shoot?

>>9782264
Unrelated to your question, sorry, but
>lolita cosplay fashion
Maybe it's because I'm into the fashion myself so I'm biased but I don't understand how anyone can type these words together and think they make sense. Cosplay is one thing, fashion is another, it can't be both.

>>9782113
I hope so, I'm getting a new job which allows wearing clothing that isn't an all black uniform and wearing casual lolita might be an option.

>>9782080
>Trusting a western community to correctly label nwt

>>9782367
>it literally had the tags attached in proof photos

>>9779570
anon thats me!

>>9782369
>implying people don't tuck the tag in and wear dresses out and pretend it's brand new when selling

>>9782411
Do you do that? What the fuck, anon?

>>9782412
I'm a secondhand poorfag, but I know people who do.

>>9782412
> https://www.mbok.jp/item/item_457902230.html
> the tag is being attached to the waist ties

Sometimes shopping on Japan sites doesn't help

>>9782412
Nayrt but I caught a girl wearing a dress that still had the tag attached at a meetup once. It was actually my first meet and she was a mod/kind of e-famous so I didn’t say anything. She later sold the dress but I don’t know if it was listed as NWT.

>>9782435
A lot of my dresses have this and I never use those waist ties so I never bothered to remove the tags. It never occurred to me to bamboozle potential buyers, though.

>>9782107
Sure, but if your BMI is causing heart failure that might be an issue

>>9782057
>It's my dream dress!
>Oh but I only want it if its new.

I don't think you've tasted the true desperation for dream dress before if you care so much about the validity of its NWT label.

Sure, you might only want it new (nothing wrong with wanting something 100% new), but just admit you never wanted it that badly and move on.

>>9782489
maybe they needed the L rerelease because they're too fat for the revival lmao

>>9782489
NAYRT but gatekeeping what someone can or can't consider a dream dress is the stupidest shit, stop.

>>9777698
>>9777707
Not just for children, they were a general late Victorian/Edwardian fashion trend, you can read a little bit about it here:
http://blog.americanduchess.com/2015/09/the-scandalous-tango-boots.html

>>9779243
The point when AP transitioned from doing one empire waist and one normal waist/skirt to just doing everything empire waist was the point when I stopped buying AP. I can tolerate empire waists with subdued poofs or an A-line cut but empire waist + big poof just makes everyone look pregnant.

>>9779131
shoulda mentioned vm having a secret goth side

>>9779800
perfection

>>9782196
>Only certain types of old school get accepted now to be honest - basically you need to look like a model snap and still have the more matchy vibe of today's coords, the actual "lolita outfits" that you saw back in the day would probably be torn to shreds now or nitpicked to death.
I don't agree at all, I actually think modern takes on old school are kind of biased towards the deliberately mismatched vibe. Modern standards for hair and make-up are way higher though.

>>9782266
Don't question normies

>>9779092
Ok but HOW did this completely sell out same day?
Their stock must be extremely low, or the chinese lolitas must be super into this somehow because I don't see anyone in the west liking this much

>>9781919
>>9781925
it was only a third of the video, and she wraps it up really well.

>>9779131
I feel so called out by this, anon. I love it.

>>9782160
It doesn't matter, those people are wrong. They're just trying to seem like lolita experts when really it just shows that they don't know anything about it.

>>9782523
>>>tumblr

How do Meta’s shoes generally fit? If I wear a UK 3/EU 36 will the M be much too big for me? (Yes i know i should measure my feet and so on, but in my experience even if you buy your actual measurement, that doesn’t always correspond to the actual size)

>>9781897
>>9781899
>>9781916
Thanks!

>>9782579
A third of the video in a series of four videos is already too much. I'm so sick of this drama. Nothing will change.
AM will continue to be as always.
She just exploited this stuff for personal gains. What did the *actual* victims get out of this? Squat. What did Tyler get? More notoriety, views.

>>9782646
I have modeled for meta at a con before, and the shoes they brought me were a few sizes too big.
I'm also EU 35/36 and I think I was given the L or M, if I remember correctly. My shoes were tea parties. I think tea parties are very forgiving because it's a flat heel, so your feet don't slide forward if it's too big, if that makes sense. If you're buying tea parties then you can just put in a good foam insole and it will be ok with some socks. For me the tea parties felt fine even without an insole, but I used one just in case during the show.

If you're buying something with high heels I'd suggest being more careful. I sell shoes at my part-time job and I always suggest a snug fit. High heels that are too big are really uncomfortable because of what I mentioned earlier, your feet slide down & forward.

I know that's a lot of vague information and doesn't tell you much about the fit, but I hope I helped somewhat

>>9782666
This sounds like a personal issue then.

>>9782666
The fuck? Do you think the same about news reporters too?
But I mean, if you care more about Tyler reporting on mundane lolita stuff and think it's annoying to speak out & take an active role in trying to make people aware of AM's bullshit, you do you.

>>9782411
I've seen this happen in person, it's so shady.

>>9782705
I once forgot to cut a tag off an item I was wearing and a girl at the meet assumed that I was going to sell it as NWT later on.
Sometimes these bitches jump to conclusions so easily.

>>9782711
No anon, that's a reasonable conclusion to arrive at.

>>9782450
>implying being 16-18 bmi will automatically give you heart failure
nice try whalelord

>>9782711
Same thing happened to me.

>>9782411
I don't cut the tags off but I never sell something I've worn as NWT. I do write if the tags are still on and how many times I wore it in the description, though.

>>9782666
>Nothing will change.
Volks cancelled their AM appearance

>>9782729
Aren't the tags attached with a safety pin?

>>9777607
I love the choker with that coord

>>9782738
nayrt but most AP tags are attached with a safety pin but i've bought some meta with tags that came looped in a button hole so it depends on the brand

>>9782738
ETC's aren't but they're really easy to take off and imo it'd be uncomfortable to keep them on

>>9782666
oh my gosh. why am I not surprised? you're chiming in against Tyler all the time, forcing this claim that she is making money or gaining attention from the pain of others.
she's not your dad, anon. she hasn't hurt anyone. please stop projecting your pained history all over this one girl and her YT comedy series. lolita is such a small subculture. this series is a labor of love for the western comm.

you complain and same so much that it's really working against you. almost sounds like you'd prefer the victims live in silence and John continue to be disgusting and disrespect people's bodies and spaces.
get help--then focus your attention and energy toward helping other survivors. If you can't see that Tyler is passionately against that predator then I don't know what to tell you. what do you expect her to do? go back in time and prevent John from sexually harassing minors? please ffs stop being dramatic.
I like her regular content, and the AM stuff is a deviation that is clearly a personal pursuit and fight. this shit isn't funny. what makes you think she's profiting? grow up.

>>9779800
as a military gothic lolita who doesn't even own any boz I am feeling personally attacked right now

>>9782755
Oh good so I’m not the only one who got the feeling that this was the same person posting over and over again.

>>9782880
It seemed pretty obvious to me that it was one anons personal vendetta against Tyler. Her style of reporting can be kind of annoying at times (the motormouth thing irks me when I'm not in the mood and want her to get to the point), but she happily admits her flaws and actually has the balls to say what everyone is thinking and puts her face behind her words, instead of hiding behind secrets or trying to walk on eggshells and not hurt anyones fee fees. Her thoughts on lolita releases amuse me and I'm glad she talks about the real shit. Seems to me like this anon is mad Tyler is more efamous in the lolita community than they are. >>9782666
If all you care about is how much attention shes getting, you might just be jealous sweetie.

>>9782049
>>9782054
>>9782057
>>9782080
>>9782489
>>9782497
Hi, just to clear things up:
I've been dreaming about the pinkxpink for a while, and yes, I'm aware that there is one on LM right now, and no, I don't need the L (I would if it was longer but they're both the same length, IW why??). This choice was a matter of timing. Having the rerelease pop up just as I've become financially comfortable was a stroke of luck, since this way I can pick up the matching socks and support a beloved brand too.

>>9782113
Sorry in advance for being dumb
So I got invoiced for over 500,000 yen when the socks+jsk should be around 360,000

Is the extra 150,000 all shipping?

>>9784945
500,000 or 50,000?
Did they assume you got the blouse too?