[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/cgl/ - Cosplay & EGL


View post   

File: 160 KB, 540x733, tumblr_osf2ygRILt1qjj1ako2_540.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9544458 No.9544458[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

Last one got nuked when one ita came to defend her and her friends, the thread before that: >>9531718

More itas, less talk

>> No.9544484
File: 135 KB, 960x720, IMG_4616.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9544484

>not calling it "keep your skirt zipped edition"
Missed opportunity

>> No.9544486

>>9544484
she looks like a pastel hobgoblin

>> No.9544489

>>9544484
Why is her face two shades lighter than her arms?

>> No.9544490

>>9544484
Why the fuck doesn't she have a neck in almost every single photo of her I've seen?

>> No.9544497

>>9544458
Guy visiting from /LARP/ here, would unironically fuck this girl

>>9544484
This is a goblin, I know from my extensive LARPing experience

>> No.9544503
File: 109 KB, 960x960, IMG_4526.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9544503

>>9544484

>> No.9544505
File: 699 KB, 1440x1440, IMG_4525.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9544505

>>9544503

>> No.9544599

>>9544458
I legitimately don't understand how threads mentioning names are not allowed yet these threads posting people's private images are? Is this not harassment?

>> No.9544622

>>9544599
Then don't post your "private images" on FB, insta, tumblr etc for everyone to see

>> No.9544625

>>9544599
They're not really private images if other people have access to them you dolt. Just means you need better friends or to not uploading anything like >>9544622 said

>> No.9544640

>>9544599
Once you post something on the internet it's no longer private. If you want something private, take pics with a personal camera and keep them in digital albums on your computer or in a photo book.

>> No.9544649
File: 324 KB, 2048x1152, 1499028744094.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9544649

from yesterday's

>> No.9544651
File: 445 KB, 2048x1356, 1499028876880.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9544651

>>9544649

>> No.9544654
File: 466 KB, 396x468, 1499036742939.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9544654

>>9544651

>> No.9544657
File: 104 KB, 640x737, 1499040943569.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9544657

>>9544654

>> No.9544661
File: 12 KB, 243x278, 1499041939074.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9544661

>>9544657

>> No.9544664

>>9544505
>>9544503

gtfo until you learn how to find actual ita's.

>> No.9544685

>>9544651
What worries me the most is not the dresses getting damaged, but if the wearers are literally hurting themselves by wearing clothing that's so tight. I mean, did that girl wear an AP jsk as a skirt?! How tight is that waistband if the shirring can't fit over her chest?! Guys, Lolita is not worth bleeding over.

>>9544503
This is just a newb.

>>9544484
Based on what she is wearing, she should know better (or is the frowny face because she forgot her petticoat while traveling? That would make me sad.)

>> No.9544689

>>9544664
Ok >>9544503 can be considered a nitpick but >>9544505 is unquestionably ita.

>> No.9544693

Mabel Salisbury, 452 Emergee Road, 46689

>> No.9544696

>>9544685
>she should know better

You must be brand new if you don't know Chanel

>> No.9544698

>>9544649
It's sad not a single one looks good or completely put together.

Also, how was the one in the white prom dress even allowed to go? That's not Lolita in any sense.
At least the itas are wearing actual dresses.

>> No.9544702

>>9544649
Is that one not Sarah Wilkinson from the NY comm?

>> No.9544703

>>9544693
>>9544702
Seriously, full names?

>> No.9544711

>>9544703
They deserve it.

>> No.9544717

>>9544711
Pretty sure that's the Ohio comm, you can see our resident "can't cut my bangs" brolita on the far right

>> No.9544720

>>9544717
You literally have no idea what you're talking about. I recognize at least two of the people.

>> No.9544723

>>9544717
You actually know these people?

>> No.9544725

>>9544693
>>9544702
>>9544717
>>9544720
If you know them in real life and yet you posted them here, that's a bit scummy desu.

>> No.9544726
File: 76 KB, 689x960, 19511381_1999223526976586_4065984768647292990_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9544726

>> No.9544727

>>9544726
Source on the shoes?

>> No.9544729

>>9544649
>>9544651
>>9544654
>>9544657
>>9544661
>>9544711
>>9544717
>>9544720
Wow, your vendetta is actually painful to watch.

>> No.9544732

>>9544720
Can confirm this is Ohio comm

>> No.9544734

>>9544726
Not lolita, but other than the face jewels i love it kind of?

>> No.9544736

>>9544726
This is so cute but not lolita at all

>> No.9544741

>>9544726
I kinda like this as a kawaii edgelord outfit, but decoration dream doesn't work for this. She'd be better off with a short pink or lavender suspender skirt.

>> No.9544742

>>9544732
How? Because fuck you, I know who one of those girls are and she's from the NY comm so shut your fucking mouth.

>> No.9544746

>>9544742
I live in Ohio. This is literally my comm. Sorry about your shit eyesight.

>> No.9544750

>>9544742
>>9544746
I'm just laughing that you are fighting over who gets to (or has to) claim the itas.

>> No.9544751

>>9544746
If it's your comm then why aren't you in the picture dumbass? Fuck you you fat bitch, I know what I'm talking about.

>> No.9544753

>>9544750
She obviously can't tell one person from another.

>> No.9544754

Full names, addresses, and vendettas. This thread is getting deleted within a few hours.

>> No.9544756

>>9544751
Because I'm in the picture of the other meet we had going on that day? It was even confirmed in the nuked thread that this is Ohio. You're seriously embarrassing yourself.

>> No.9544757

>>9544753
Diabetes makes you lose your eyesight tho

>> No.9544759

>>9544756
You probably aren't even. You're just samefagging because they're getting talked about you fucking hungry cunt.

>> No.9544761

>>9544754
Great another ita thread being nuked...

>> No.9544762

>>9544726
Sauce on that top?

>> No.9544764

>>9544759
This is just pathetic anon. Unless you're blind you can tell that neither of the people you listed are in that photo

>> No.9544766

>>9544762
That top is ita as fuck, learn to dress yourself.

>> No.9544769

>>9544766
Nayrt but that top is cute as long as you don't wear it with lolita.

>> No.9544770

>>9544766
Not using it for lolita you dumb fuck. Calm yourself.

>> No.9544772

>>9544764
Everyone in ohio is a fat bitch, your fat rolls are obvs blocking your vision.

>> No.9544775

>>9544770
Then learn to fucking dress. Fucking summerfags.

>> No.9544778
File: 14 KB, 255x255, 1433293396995.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9544778

>>9544772

>> No.9544779

>>9544764
Being a fat fucking ita is no excuse for being a complete idiot.

>> No.9544782

Holy shit the drama from Ohio continues

>> No.9544784

>>9544778
You're clearly delusional. I posted the photos.

>> No.9544792

>>9544784
Sure you did anon, sure you did.

>> No.9544793

>>9544756
>>9544764
I was at that meet. What were you wearing?

>> No.9544796

>>9544792
Right. Because who did post them then, you? You're obviously just trying to get associated with a comm because e-fame.

>> No.9544797

>>9544793
This failed attempt to find out who posted you is really sad

>> No.9544799

>>9544796
If you're the original poster (which I seriously doubt with how different your attitude is to the op) why are you reposting them all when it was the reason for the other thread getting nuked? You're obviously just trying to stir shit, especially dropping names like you are now. Did you get a handful of sand up your vag or what?

>> No.9544800

>>9544725
Did you not see the tantrum in the last thread? Fully deserved.

>> No.9544801

>>9544797
Look you fat fucking whore. I posted the fucking photos and some fucking cunt is being delusional as fuck.