/cgl/ - Cosplay & EGL

>>8758845
Nah, girl in white looks fine. Girl in black would be ita if she tried to call it lolita, did she?

>>8758854
Nahhhh she didn't

>>8758874

>>8758878
She has all the components. I think she has potential desu.

>>8758878

>>8758880
Being fat is always ita.

>>8758897
Not even fat, morbidly obese. IMO once your body is in a state like that you should spend your money on healthy food and a gym membership, not frilly dresses. Dying at 35 isn't very kawaii.

>>8758903
>tfw friend o mine tries to argue that eating better is expensive so everyone has an excuse
>tfw 6 nuggets and a small fry is still cheaper than large fry 10 nugget
>tfw eating less will never be more expensive

>>8758897
shhh, the salty fatties on this board will come up and start aggressively defending their rolls

>>8758944
I'm sorry what's the problem here?

>>8758945
Are you blind?

>>8758939
>mfw people think pre-packaged meals are cheaper than chicken and lettuce
I mean, sure, you might have to dish out more initially, but $10 of groceries will last you a lot longer than $10 worth of food from mcdonalds, as long as you're smart about it.

>>8758949
Are you anon? At worst I see only nitpicks here.

>>8758944
Nitpick
Better blouse and add shoes

Not ita at all

>>8758944
Let's not invite that dumbass back into the thread pls

>>8758944
Person on the left looks like maybe a nitpick.

>>8758874

Blouse and headdress have got to go, but otherwise I fucking want those tights & dress.

>>8758845
Girl in white reminded me of Mr. Yan

>>8758956
>>8758954
Left is fine other than the piercing, right is ita as fuck.

>>8758854
something is 'painful to look at' just because it's labelled incorrectly? So very very /cgl/

>>8758945
>that blouse
>those shoes
>that everything
i dont think girl on left is even relevant but girl on right is definitely ita enough to burn my eyes

>>8759018
She looks Ok, you just have stupidly high standards.

>>8759018
It's only the shoes and blouse

3 strikes and it's ita
Go away vendetta chan

>>8759017
Chill out, OP said that girl in black didn't called it lolita.

>>8758944
Those fucking bangs on the right

>>8759025
>3 strikes and it's ita
what arbitrary rule is this?

>>8759168
Something that people made up as an excuse to keep posting their nitpicks in the ita threads

>>8759031
this was in reference to

>Girl in black would be ita if she tried to call it lolita

To me that just sounds in theory like an ok but mislabelled outfit

>>8758941
Always remember, you're not supposed to defend yourself!

>>8758903
>Dying at 35 isn't very kawaii.
That's a wild exaggeration. My mom has been obese since her late 20's and she's still alive.
Not that it's okay, but you're losing your shit and not being practical here.

>>8758897
There are decent plus size lolitas, we've had threads where lots of them get posted. There is a different between being big and being obese.

This shouldn't have to be discussed so often in ita threads.

>>8759208
Her outfit isn't that good.

Also this is a pretty well known rule that we've implemented in past ita threads. Lots of tumblrinas get posted because they tagged an outfit as lolita when it clearly isn't.

>>8758845
Briz isn't ita, she's just super tacky and stupid-looking. True that those boots are hideous though.

>>8758944
inbred-kei

>>8759216
>Also this is a pretty well known rule that we've implemented in past ita threads

This shit is hilarious. Have fun I guess.

>>8759320
Either white tights or white beret to balance the light and dark colors. Not ita, try again.

>>8759320
the scepter is lame but everything else seems ok

>>8758953
>>8758953
Packaged food might be more expensive, but processed foods are better deals in that they are both higher in calories, much cheaper, and more convenient (important if you work two jobs) than fresh produce. Also it requires little if any equipment for prep, which is important for people who don't have ovens/pots/pans/cutting boards/good knives etc. And there are food deserts in the US where grocery stores are not accessible and only fast food/convenience store are in reasonable driving distance. All of these lead to a seemingly paradoxical trend of increasing obesity AND malnutrition in the U.S. People can get the calories for cheap, but they can't get the nutrients they need. It is also a fact that eating healthier is more expensive (see below).

Food deserts:
https://apps.ams.usda.gov/fooddeserts/fooddeserts.aspx
Processed foods being cheaper:
www.npr.org/2013/03/01/173217143/why-process-food-is-cheaper-than-healthier-options
www.hsph.harvard.edu/news/press-releases/healthy-vs-unhealthy-diet-costs-1-50-more/

Aka, if we want less fat itas, demand the government subsidizes a diversity of produce rather than the corn you find in nearly all processed food in the form of corn syrup (which is also highly addictive). Make healthy food more accessible.

Moar you know.

>>8759302
You can go through the archives yourself.

>>8759337
If you can afford to buy lolita you can afford to eat salad. Just sayin

>>8759337
You're about to get a lot of shit I bet.
You buy healthy food before you buy luxury brand.

>>8759343
Ah yes, I knew it.

Anyway, yeah, it's ridiculous to think someone wouldn't have pots and pans and would work a full time job or two jobs and spend all their money on lolita instead of better food...

but obviously people are doing this and you can't talk them out of it. Those people are unhealthy for a reason, it's because they make those kinds of choices.

>>8759342
Just because other noobs think this is a thing doesn't make it real. Have at, but, the rest of us oldfags are going to laugh at your lack of knowing what the fuck you're doing. Ita literally means so terrible looking it's difficult to look at, not "three random things". That's a goddamn nitpick.
>>8759204
Yep, pretty much this.

>>8758882
I know I should hate this, and it's definitely not lolita, but it's pretty cute. Probably I'm just blinded by the fact a fat person is wearing something that fits them properly for once.

>>8759320
She looks fine, everything fits, maybe different tights but that's all.

>>8759383
It's on various sites as well?
Maybe things have changed.

>>8759400
I've been involved in lolita for nearly a decade. It's never been a thing. Just because you read it online a few places doesn't make it true.

>>8758882
Good GOD

>>8759403
Fuck off, wondercunt.

>>8759403
bro the 'rules' for what constitutes ita have changed over time, most people don't wear shit milanoo lace monsters anymore and threads started turning into the same 5 pictures, it did change because it got boring.

>>8759445
Actually, I'm Celticfreefall (YOLO I'M BORED) so no, not really. This has never been a thing.

>>8759452
If it changed because it got boring that's just another shitty reason to call nitpick photos ita. Just because you ran out of real ita photos doesn't make a slightly off coordinate suddenly horrifying to look at. This place has gone to shit.

>>8759356
I don't care if someone is fat and wears lolita. I don't see why it matters. If the argument is that it's unhealthy, so is smoking but no one calls smoking ita. People just don't like how fat looks, I guess?

>>8759018
Vendetta

>>8759453
Oh my god, you're still around?

>>8759468
Post on FB/COF pretty infrequently, but yeah. Still kicking. I'm usually on here to sell stuff, I prefer selling to gulls. Sitting here with a glass of wine trying to wind down for the night and let this bullshit get my blood up.

>>8759463
If you're so fat that skirts don't look poofy on you anymore or you look like you're bursting at the seams, that's pretty ita. And it's not like people don't frown upon smoking in lolita either.

>>8759463
It doesn't matter if it's unhealthy or not, that's personal choice. Since lolita is more of a photoshoot and special events thing than an everyday thing these days, you only have aesthetic appeal to judge coords by. Fat doesn't fit the image, just like having an uncute face wouldn't fit the image.

>>8759482
>having an uncute face wouldn't fit the image
Being fat or uncute is completely arbitrary and up to the individual. What a bunch of bullshit. Also, it's only a photoshoot thing if you're a giant narcissist and being seen online is your entire life. The rest of it wear our clothes and don't give a shit what anyone else thinks as long as we're well dressed.

>>8759489

While you may have a few fat fetishists think that morbid or superobesity is kawaii, the general population doesn't think it's healthy.

And it's nice to go on and on about how you don't care what people think looks good or bad, but we're in an ita thread. Of course people are going to judge what looks bad in a thread that specifically sets it up.

>>8759510
>bunch of random insinuations LOL
You can be huge like x-box and still dress nicely to flatter your figure, that includes lolita. I have no problem with people being posted that are fat and shittily dressed or are busting out of the seams of the dresses they're wearing and look terrible. Being fat, however, does not automatically make someone an ita. Quit being a hungry skeleton and eat a cheeseburger. Pro-ana is not kind to your reasoning skills.

>>8759519

>quit being a hungry skeleton

Huh, and you think it's me making assumptions.

If you think morbidly obese people have the potential to look good, more power to you. Quite frankly though, while I'm fine with plus size, I draw the line at the point where you start looking wider than tall.

post itas......................Do it

>>8759519

>Quit being a hungry skeleton and eat a cheeseburger. Pro-ana is not kind to your reasoning skills.

And it's you saying I'm making assumptions?

Sorry to burst your bubble mate but while you are correct that beauty is arbitrary, there are studies that show that fat people are unfortunately discriminated against at work because of their size and not conforming to commonly accepted standards of aesthetics.

And since we're in an ita thread, on /cgl/ of all places, it is one aspect that people do take into account. If we're going to harp on about doing makeup well and flattering colors to skintone, we cannot unfortunately separate the person from the clothing, and that will be taken into account, whether or not you like it, on an anonymous board whose culture tends to be about 2cm skin deep.

And as you said, the entire thing is arbitrary so now we're back to square one where we're arguing about what constitutes 'ouch' or 'ita' again, which is again entirely arbitrary and will be up to the individual whether they take the person's appearance into account.

>>8759563
Hey, you're the one who started this catfight. If you're going to make assumptions, I'm going to throw them right back in your face. Your entire argument is ridiculous, which is why you resorted to ad hominem attacks. If you'd said it was your opinion instead of fact I wouldn't have jumped on your ass in the first place. So, admit it: it's just your opinion.

>>8759570

>ad hominem attacks

Did you feel offended when I mentioned fat fetishists? Because I definitely wasn't referring to you.

I never attacked you personally. You could be a computer for all I care. I just think trying to separate person from fashion specifically in a thread that attacks the person for looking like the Japanese equivalent of 'holy shit bleach in my eyes.'

And yup, definitely my opinion. I think plus size is pretty cute, but once you start looking wider than tall, it could be a problem fitting into a shape that is remotely flattering. Just putting it out there that this is not in fact not an uncommon opinion.

>>8759460
>This place has gone to shit.
lol, I knew it. typical.

>>8759576

>tfw she's in your comm

>>8759320
fuck off vendetta chan, she's nitpick at the worst.

>>8759574
poorly executed but I think I see what she was going for and it could have been cute

>>8759586
how short is she irl? Cause that skirt looks super long

>>8759600
She's 5'5"

>>8759018
>>burn muh eyes

cringe, anon. Take a xanax.

>>8759579
Well I should say that this particular aspect of the board has gone to shit. But anyways. Just make a nitpick thread and say, "I think she's too tubby for this outfit" or "These tights are too plain". Goddamn. Call it what it is.

>>8759563
No one is saying that being morbidly obese is healthy. I'm throwing the accusations back at you because you don't have to be a fat fetishist to think that fat girls can look good if their clothes fit well and they dress themselves nicely, as you were insinuating. It's a stupid argument in either direction, right? And bringing up that people get discriminated against because of their weight just hammers the point home that it's shitty to call a person ita purely because they're overweight when the outfit itself is fine and coordinated well.

And yes, it's also circular argument bringing up that it's entirely subjective. That was my point; saying all fat chicks/ugly chicks look shitty in lolita as a fact is just dumb and completely subjective. Saying something looks ita is subjective too, but for fucks sake it's just clothing. People can't help being born ugly, and not being fat for most people isn't as easy as buying a larger sized dress. But anyways. The three things rule is dumb. Calling all chubby girls ita is dumb. Sticking to that as my main argument here.

>>8759611

I think the ita thread is entirely subjective to be honest. While we make fun of itas for instance, I'm pretty sure most normalfags would point and laugh at us on the street. You'll have oldfags sometimes defending what everyone else agrees to be itas, you'll have newfags tearing apart a quite frankly bland coordinate.

But yet we're here.

I just feel like the ita thread will continually go to shit because we've got a bunch of salty bitches who have different standards of what looks like shit. We have you here who has a somewhat fairer view of what 'shit' looks like but then we have salty me who thinks anyone above a BMI of 40 burns my eyes.

>>8759580
Besides the necklace this is a good example of using a lolita dress in a normie outfit imo. (Not saying that was the ops intention just a thought)

>>8759626
Is this girl a lolcow or something cause I always like her outfits but everyone on here hates her

>>8759630

Well, if you want to take anything away, just please, for the love of god, don't do your wig like hers. It looks like a hairdresser student's unfortunate pincurl experiment that was thrown in the trash.

>>8759638
Don't worry anon I just said I liked her outfit lol

>>8759622
Either way having someone say that you look shitty is a terrible feeling, but with clothing at least you can take the clothes off and change them. Fat people know they're fat. It can take years to loose excess weight healthily. Plastic surgery is really fucking expensive and way out of reach compared to a frilly dress. So, it's just ridiculous to make fun of things that people cannot easily change. Just putting that perspective out there.

I'm old-school (literally) and so that kind of shit is off-limits to me. Be salty, but, at least don't justify it as if you're doing it for the persons benefit. Posting someone on an ita thread because they're fat accomplishes nothing. At least with outfits, people can learn something from being posted here. That and I don't post people here, I just lurk because I actually learn shit myself from seeing other people fuck up. I think a lot of us are here for that reason too.

>>8759622
But anyways, maybe I am just a salty oldfag. I've had too much wine. Thanks for the debate. Cheers, ya'll.

>>8759659
please go die

>>8759659
you sound like a fedora fag

>>8759630
She's an idiot and she looks like trash, and she refuses to listen to any concrit she gets.

>>8759630
People just hate her 'cos she's ugly.

>>8759626
It amazes me how she throws all this money at brand but still comes out looking like a frumpy, crazy cat lady. Is she the new Moitie ita? This is unflattering and messy.

>>8759216
That's not a rule "we" implemented, someone made that shit up and a bunch of people decided to roll with it.

>>8759337
If you can afford lolita, you can afford non-shitty groceries.

>>8759630
I don't really like most of her outfits, but this one's nice and not all are bad, so yeah.

>>8760024
>If you can afford lolita, you can afford non-shitty groceries.

Not a fatanon but this is a nonsensical platitude. If someone bought a dress with some excess birthday or holiday money a few months ago it doesn't necessarily mean they have the cash to buy organic every day. It's like saying someone who has a car or a nice tv shouldn't be on public assistance because they had some money to buy a luxury item at one point. Food is even worse because that's generally something that needs to be bought on a daily and/or weekly basis in order to live, unless they have the time and live in the climate where they can grow their own food.

>>8759356

I use to be thick and not fat at all, but I got really big once I got on birth control. I didn't choose to be fat and I absolutely hate it. I found a gym and started working out, but haven't seen any results. I switched non-hormonal birth control and I'm finally starting to lose weight, albeit slowly. The only thing that makes me feel remotely pretty is lolita, but I still feel like ita trash because people tout fat = ita.

TL;DR It's not always someone's choice to be fat.

>>8760056
Same. I would describe myself from a few years ago as skinny fat; I was 5ft4 and 145lbs so not obese but not super skinny. I started on the mini-pill and suddenly I was 180lbs despite not changing my eating habits; wasn't in a position to join a gym so I just walked everywhere instead of drive and done sit ups/squats with no real change other than I didn't have any cellulite. I stopped taking birth control in the last 6 months and I've slowly gotten back to 150lbs and now I'm financially able to, attending the gym on a regular basis.

>>8760032
>it doesn't necessarily mean they have the cash to buy organic every day
Well there's the problem, they think they need to waste their money on organic food when they can shop at a regular grocery store. If they're looking at wholefoods as a reference, of course they're going to say McDonalds is cheaper.

>>8760071
Are you seriously implying there's no price differential between common slaughterhouse meat and meats that are certified to not have been raised with growth hormones? Milk that has been tainted with growth hormones compared to organic milk or unsweetened almond milk that's more expensive by the quart?
Fresh organic vegetables versus vegetables covered in pesticide films or BPA canned?
Even in "regular" stores there are stark price differences between mass-produced foods and foods that are safer.

>>8760056
>>8760060
You should really be focusing on diet instead of just saying you can't get to the gym. Most of your weight loss is going to be made in the kitchen. Exercise is just there to burn a few extra calories off the top and give you a bit of muscle to raise your standing metabolism and so you don't look like a skinnyfat deflated balloon when you've lost it. I have a whole host of hormonal disorders that people usually blame for being obese, but I've kept the weight off with a high protein low sugar diet. And I mean low sugar, including in foods where it's hidden.

>>8760075
Not at all? You just restated exactly what I was saying, but just so we're on the same page, you can buy chicken from a regular grocery store for less than you would at an organic store. I've heard it on here, as well as other places, that the only way you can eat healthy is by buying organic when that's simply not true, it just perpetuates the myth that unhealthy food is more expensive than healthy food.

>>8760087
Did you even read either of their posts which said they both gained weight after starting birth control and lost it after stopping? Or did you read them and are just retarded?

>>8760088
...but even at the regular store there's still a price difference between non-growth hormone chicken and chicken raised for common slaughter. You don't seem to understand that and I wonder if you've ever read the labels on grocery products or have bought your own food before.

>>8760099
I feel as though we're almost on the same page, but not quite there yet. My point is, don't buy that expensive thing when you can buy the regular price thing if you're on a budget (and that it's less expensive than fast food). What's your point, because all I"m getting right now is "regular grocery stores sell organic too!"

>>8760113
The point is going over your head and I'm not sure how much clearer I can be. You originally said that buying safer food ("organic") wasn't expensive. So now that I've pointed out that it is even in normal stores, you're saying to buy the cheaper product with the growth hormones that contributes to weight gain? What exactly are you arguing about?

>>8760125
I never said to buy organic, though, infact quite the opposite. OP originally said
>If someone bought a dress with some excess birthday or holiday money a few months ago it doesn't necessarily mean they have the cash to buy organic every day.
To which I replied
>Well there's the problem, they think they need to waste their money on organic food when they can shop at a regular grocery store
Meaning "stop wasting money on the organic version when the regular version is more affordable". Then you came in with "but organic at regular stores is still more expensive than the regular stuff", which is where the misunderstanding came in. I was right when we said we were on the same page, but you somehow got it into your head that I was advocating for organics when I wasn't.

I was never talking about weight gain, those were different anons, but since we're on the subject, me and everyone I know have been eating those growth hormone filled foods and we're still at a normal weight. I'm not saying they may or may not have adverse side effects (I haven't read up on it), but even if they did cause you to gain weight, you're going to gain much, much less weight on regular groceries than you would if you were eating fast food all the time.

>>8760093
The extra weight has to come from somewhere, though. Unless you're saying those pills themselves are 2000 calories a pop.

>>8760139
It's possible that it's a mix of metabolism changes and them either wanting to eat more or getting more hungry than normal.

>>8759754
>>8759929
Nay, just a little more chill than the I used to be. You should try it, does wonders.

>>8760147
So then dietary changes should help, right?

>>8760151
Except anons said that their dietary habits didn't change, and even with dietary changes it's still harder to lose weight on bc.

>>8760151
Yes. As /fit/ would say, calories in > calories out. If your metabolic rate changes, you should be changing with it, it's why old ladies who used to eat plenty as a young adult gain weight, their metabolic need changes, but their eating habits stay the same. It's also why weight lifters have to eat so much, as compared to people who are more sedentary.

>>8760151
bc literally changes your metabolism and how you store fat in some people, and can make you retain water. this can make you put on extra weight.

>>8760147
You can smooth over metabolic changes by adding weightlifting to your routine and you can balance out increased hunger by raising the fat/protein content and lowering the portion size of your meals.

>>8759576
this girl always has an opinion on everything ever posted on rufflechat

seeing this made me very quietly kek and feel better about myself

>>8759626
lolita meets toddlers and tiaras

>>8760160
Then you adjust your diet to compensate. Everyone would love to eat like a teenager and not gain weight forever but unfortunately, as you get older you have to make a choice between your body or pizza. It's part of growing up.

>>8760032
non-shitty groceries does not equal organic, anon. I just get tired of people complaining that they have to eat fast food every single day because vegetables are SO expensive, when regular, non-organic produce is available at reasonable prices. Then again I also live in a country where eating out every day is freakishly expensive compared to cooking yourself, even if you stick to the dollar menu at McDonald's.

Sage for completely OT.

Where all the itas at?
>would contribute if I had anything good

>>8760160
>>8760158
Fuck off, post itas. This isn't your blog

>>8760189
Nice ita you posted, anon, great contribution. You sure showed us by posting that ugly-as-sin lolita, who can only be described with the japanese word for "ouch".

>>8759626
At least she isnt wearing more godawful shironuri.
Girl needs to stop rewearing the same fucking bonnet though, it only makes her face look more trollish.

>>8760075
Anon wasn't implying that.

Also, if you're using that excuse to support not buying groceries over eating out, how do you really know that those foods don't contain hormones?

Some people can consider cutting down meat and dairy consumption.

>>8759320
Obvious vendetta is obvious

>>8759626
I don't get what's ita about this? I mean I'm not sure what's going on on her head, but that's a pretty nice outfit.

>>8760273
I'm curious about her shironuri and what's wrong with it

>>8759453
Please excuse that I don't kiss your royal oldfag ass, but you're still wrong

>>8759557
Why don't you post some instead of bitching about it

>>8760428
She's not tho

>>8759557
follow your own advice fag

>>8760192
Sorry you got posted, I'm sure you deserved it

>>8760511
>that's your response
C'mon, you can do better than that. If you're going to cry about no itas getting posted, you could at the very least contribute instead of adding to the shit posting. Step it up senpai.

this thread sure is shit

what is the name for ita ouji? Nouji?

>>8760648
What god do I have to pray to to get this image out of my retinas?

>>8760661
oops wrong pic, sorry

>>8760648
I'd wear that dress if it was black and white

>>8758882
That stance..

>>8760139
>>8760157
Different anon, but I switched birth control brand (insurance wouldn't pay for usual anymore) and suddenly plateaued after gaining a few pounds back. It is suddenly hard as hell to lose, despite sticking to my planned calories and also logging activities for burned calories.
It really does make it more difficult! I got so frustrated, and I had finals so I took like two weeks off logging. Maybe my metabolism will be higher again after eating higher amounts for two weeks.

>>8760615
This is cute in a normie way.

>>8759519
get out fatty chan no one like to see your fat rolls. lose weight then come back to the fashion again. good luck

>>8760075
>>8760099

Wow, you're uninformed. Hormones and genetic modification are required not to effect the end product, dumbass, and so called "organic" bullshit can use hormones and pesticides.

>>8760708
I just had my bc changed for the same reason and am noticing that I'm storing fat and water a lot more. Try cutting added sugar from your diet and eat things that are naturally low in sugar. Keep track of your caloric intake - I have PCOS so my metabolism is garbage, plus the wonky bc now, so I had to cut out about 200 calories from my diet.
Also, try doing more weights instead of cardio at the gym. If you do cardio, you stop burning calories shortly after your workout. With weights, you gain more muscle and will burn calories throughout the day. You'll sweat out water weight at the gym as well, so I highly recommend working out for at least an hour when you can.
>polite sage for OT and no ita pics

>>8758882
Omg

>>8759209
There it is

>>8758882
This seems so eerily toddlerish/infantile to me. Like those humans in Wall-E. It makes me think of a big, lumbering baby.

>>8758882
If her hair didn't look so nasty and she was wearing cute shoes I'd like this. The sweater and skirt combo actually aren't terrible.

>>8760354
>if you're using that excuse to support not buying groceries over eating out

They weren't.
Sage for OT and strawman arguments.

>>8758944
Girl on left isn't ita, she is cute love her coord. Right..... ehhh that blouse though....

>>8759012
Piercings are not ita.

>>8759574
looks like a character from fable 2 or 3

>>8760177
But again, processed foods are even cheaper than fresh produce. And people need calories as much, if not more, as they need nutrients.

It's also important to remember this is the U.S. Processed food is SO much cheaper because corn, wheat, and soy-nutritionally devoid crops-are heavily subsidized by the government. These crops started being subsidized during the Great Depression in the 1930s, and it's been inexplicably continued ever since. That's why those crops are found in almost everything- they are just incredibly cheap to produce.

So it really is an issue of healthy food not being accessible- it can't be contested that produce, organic or not, is more expensive than processed foods, which give you the most bang for your buck in terms of calories. The government could subsidize other kinds of food, but they don't. If you try meeting your minimum amount of needed calories with food stamps, you absolutely HAVE to buy processed foods.

>>8760658
Fuck! Lmao.

>>8759023
Wait whaat, not even OP but how does that looks ok in your eyes?
Cgl is clearly lowering its standards

>>8761177
They very well can/are almost always ita.

>>8760648
My eyes burn

>>8759626
I would not classify this as Ita at all. Minus some of the head piece and exchange the bag for a standard gold heart bag it would be good.

>>8759320
Somebody has a vendetta. This outfit is not ita.

>>8758944
Somebody has a vendetta.

>>8758944
This isn't a vendetta thread

>>8761436
I agree that it's not technically ita, but her posture and the fit along with the stupidly long underskirt make this a huge nitpick to me imo.

>>8760510
Fuck you I like this one

>>8760658
yep, nouji.

or "ohNOuji"

>>8758878
Isn't this the girl who posted a 'sexy school girl' coord?

what the fuck even? I swear these are getting worse

>>8761534

>>8760510
You're kidding right?

>>8761534
And the award for worst front bow on a fake goes toooo

>>8759626
All she needs is a new spine desu

>>8761536
Does Disneyland just not let you in if you're well dressed?

>>8758944
This was the girl on the right's first time trying to wear lolita. The girl on the left made and sold her that dress and let her leave the house like that. Why you post her after the last thread anon?

>>8758845
Calm down hun, haven't you had enough bitching on BtB?

>>8758878
Just fat, not particularly ita.

>>8761537
Skeleton tights and skeleton hand clips are really looked down on here on cgl

>>8761836
OP here! I didn't made those secrets, relax, she isn't well received in any comm so it could be anyone from her country.

>>8761574

I know on normal days they won't let you in if you're wearing something too "costumeish" because they don't want people thinking you work for them. I don't know how they deal with Lolita day, but I know for goth day they pull all the characters from walking around so no one can take pictures of them wearing a noose next to Mickey Mouse. I can see some OTT or particularly detailed filled and luxurious dresses getting quietly pulled aside if they felt it looked too confusing to the average patron.

>>8761877
Nitpick. Perfect casual coord.

>>8761877
Nitpick

>>8758880
She's been a lolita for literally years now and hasn't improved beyond this point

>>8761877
Nitpick, if even that.

>>8759574
is that PT??

>>8760615
something about the dress and the location remind me a lot of Asuka.

>>8758944
is that fucking mick jagger

>>8758944
The girl on the left seriously looks like a 40 year old man..

>>8761845
I had no idea..I've been on cgl on and off for years, I don't follow it religiously, but last thing I knew cgl loved that creepy cute shit. Anyways, regardless of personal taste, the coord itself is fine it seems.

>>8759643
It took years to put the fat on. It'll take years to loose it. Fat people aren't entitled to looking cute in clothes just because they feel left out. That's a cheap shortcut. You want to feel cute in the fashion? Do the work. Don't bully people into accepting your form of "beauty" when you have trouble seeing it yourself.

>>8759320
She looks fine. I hate scepters too, but even that one isn't even that bad. Someone mad.

>>8760428
No she isn't. I've been lurking cgl long enough to have seen people try to shove that stupid rule of three thing through too. It's bullshit, and it's recent bullshit too.

>>8760615
This is hella cute as a sundress, was it actually tagged lolita?

>>8761994
>don't bully people into accepting you, but be okay with people bullying you because you're fat and deserve it!
Oh, anon.

>>8758944
The lady on the left looks really cute. Is this about the lady on the right?

>>8761994
>Fat people aren't entitled to looking cute in clothes
Stopped reading right there. You're one of those crazy people who thinks unfit people shouldn't leave the house.
You sound like a real joy to spend time with. I'd rather hang out with a fun fat girl.

>>8761994
I can't stand plus size girls who refuse to learn how to dress themselves but this level of sodium in your blood is just bad for you, anon. Fat people exist and you're going to have to look at them occasionally.

No one's saying you have to like the way they look, but your argument here is that an otherwise well put-together and well-fitting coordinate is magically invalid because of the person wearing it. Which is ridiculous.

Sage for OT, post more itas

>>8761994
fucking die, bloody hell.

>>8759320
Chill it, vendetta-chan. This is the 2nd time she's been posted and I suspected it is you. She's full of nitpicks, but she's a sweetheart and improves greatly.

>>8761534
Peg Bundy-lolita?

>>8760093
Considering the arguments to follow, I'm going to say retarded. They have no understanding of how metabolism works with hormones.

>>8761534
Holy shit. This is worse.

>>8758944
Listen, I think this girl is an annoying bitch. Which is why I unfriended her on Facebook. Like a mature adult. I guess that's a difficult concept for some, and I'd really prefer to NOT have this thread also shitted up by her and people arguing with her.

>>8760991
Thank you for the advice! Good luck with your fitness

>>8758882
i hate it when they stand like that

>>8761872
They do no such thing. Gay Day, Raver Day, Goth Day, Lolita Day etc. are not officially endorsed by Disney and are put on by fans. Tourists would also go batshit crazy if they pulled any face or costumed characters because of an unofficial themed day.

>>8760615
Awh but she's cute

>>8760636
literally everything about this says pirate costume....and not lolita at all.

>>8761534
God this makes me sad :C