[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/cgl/ - Cosplay & EGL


View post   

File: 137 KB, 538x810, tumblr_inline_npmppj8dmM1tt3h57_540.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8502530 No.8502530 [Reply] [Original]

Last on is hitting limit so here we go.

Also special shout out Blog Gull keeping us entertained. Make sure to give updates on the good fight as they come in

>> No.8502534
File: 42 KB, 672x360, Screenshot (2).png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8502534

>>8502530
What a time to be alive

>> No.8502537
File: 117 KB, 400x536, tumblr_nrpvvxnnK91s1580uo2_400.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8502537

>> No.8502552

>>8502534
>From the same girl but way to long to fit into one screen cap so get ready

>Part 1
One of my very old posts, it goes by the name of “that-aint-lolita” and it reblogged a post of a couple pictures, but removed the tags, and left a snarky little comment saying “none of these pictures are lolita” but as I went to further investigate their profile what a made me laugh is that their description says “I don’t do this out of hate, I do this because a lot of us are fed up with how people tag things” fucking first off who the fuck made you Tumblr police. Secondly it isn’t your profile to fucking manage. If you don’t like the way people do things on their profiles it ain’t none of your god Damn business to sit their and be a snobby knit picking ass hole about how they run their profile.

>> No.8502554

>>8502552
>part 2
I also saw how your profile said “oh we give constructive criticism, if you can’t handle it then don’t post your stuff” no you give unwanted humiliation to people of the lolita community, unprecedented comments, that weren’t asked for, your opinion wasn’t sought after, constructive criticism usually consists of the person outwardly asking you for advice. It isn’t constructive criticism when you reblog their stuff, without them consoling you first, knit picking at every little thing wrong about their renditions of how they perceive lolita. IT ISN’T FUCKING CONSTRUCTIVE CRITICISM WHEN YOU JUST SHARE SOMEONE’S POST RIGHT OFF THE BACK, UNKNOWINGLY TO THEM WHAT YOU’RE GOING TO SAY. IF IT HAD BEEN ANY TYPE OF CONSTRUCTIVE CRITICISM THEY WOULD’VE APPROACHED YOU, SHOWED YOU THEIR SELFIE, THEN PROCEEDED TO ASK YOU FOR ADVICE. YET YOU REBLOGGED THEIR SHIT, THEN PROCEEDED TO HUMILIATE THEM, POINT EVERY PROBLEM APPARENTLY WRONG WITH THEIR OUTFIT, AND THEN SCOFFED AT THEIR ATTEMPT IN TO TRYING OUT LOLITA. You do realize that makes some people discouraged into even want to try lolita again ever? You’re an elitist. You blog is encouraging bullying. You’re hateful and rude. Unlike you, they don’t have the bukus of money to fucking afford jsk, berry garden, or fancy fucking patterns to make detailed cords and outfits.The lolita community is suppose to be accepting and cordial. Not filled with a bunch of snooty bitches who think they’re giving constructive criticism when all they are doing is humiliating and bullying others, knit picking and mocking these people of their outfits, as if you’re fucking high on the god damped totem pole. Get the fuck over yourselves.

>> No.8502556

>>8502554
>part 3
If you really wanted to help others with introduction to Lolita and wanted to give actual advice, I’d advise you to honestly quit while you’re behind. You don’t give constructive criticism, you say you aren’t doing this out of hate, but yet half of your fucking posts or reblogs are hateful and asinine. You may not think you’re being a fucking bully, but half your shit is hateful. Knit picking girls outfit, taking people’s innocent selfies, and point every noticeable flaw out, calling it not lolita, is very hurtful to these girls and boys, even though it’s not perfect at least they had the fucking courage to wear their lovely outfits. And who the fuck are you to judge what is or is not lolita to them? Have you heard of thinking outside the fucking box? Who are you too claim not wa-lolita, or sweet Lolita, or classical lolita? If you were actually of any help. You wouldn’t sit there and scoff at others blogs and selfies. Honestly your blog sucks. Your blog sucks more than one whose improperly tagged their shit. All I get from your blog is snobby, knowitall, egotistical, hateful, fucking bully. And I find it pretty fucking petty how your description says “this isn’t out of hate, we just are fed up with how people tag things” I’m tired of people like you declaring your responses as constructive critisim. When in fact no one asked for it. It was unsolicited bullshit. Reblogging someone’s picture and picking out every flaw, without any prior knowledge or prior meeting upon it, and calling it “not lolita” is actually quite harsh, from the looks of it your blog is a thinly veiled lie.

>> No.8502558

>>8502556
>part 4
It seems all peachy keen all uplifting and shit until I start reading your bullshit. “This isn’t sweet lolita, it looks like she just threw stuff on.” Or some other hateful crap. Your blog is everything but uplifting, anything but not hateful, your blog is a lies, contradicting and it fails to meet the criteria of motivational, helpful, encouraging, when you reblog that persons rendition of lolita and basically scoff at their ensemble, picking everything wrong with with he outfit. You don’t uplift people, your tearing down someone’s self esteem because it isn’t perfect enough for you, or good enough and you should be fucking ashamed to call your self lolita. Your blog is a fucking joke. @this-aint-lolita.tumblr.com @this-aint-lolita.tumblr.com @this-aint-lolita.tumblr.com @this-aint-lolita.tumblr.com

>> No.8502560

>>8502534
>ads hole
kek

>> No.8502566

>>8502552
>>8502554
>>8502556
>>8502558
I would return her speech with grammar corrections, jfc. There's nothing like poor English from someone who is obviously a native speaker to convince me not to take them seriously.

>> No.8502571

>>8502566
Seriously though, did she fail English?

>> No.8502576

>>8502537
is that a replica melty mermaid

>> No.8502578

>>8502552
>>8502554
>>8502556
>>8502558
>being this mad

>> No.8502585
File: 180 KB, 796x1000, tumblr_nr00mbO5XF1qhauwfo1_400.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8502585

Our fav hijab lolita from a previous thread posted these with

>Here are some possible Lolita coord dress options. I know a lot of Lolita’s look for Brand or Off-Brand dresses, but there are many ways to be creative and create your own unique Lolita dress.

>> No.8502590
File: 50 KB, 240x320, tumblr_nr95l4WnJN1u0692lo1_250.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8502590

Not even worn yet and already bad

>> No.8502593

>>8502585
Was it Sugarnoor or something like that? That chick is ita as fuck. Alyssa on the other hand is almost always on point. Shes she only hijab lolita that ever looks good imo

>> No.8502594

>>8502585
ohhh noo skater dresses!

>> No.8502597

>>8502590
Looks pretty cute to me and im not even really into sweet anymore.

>> No.8502599
File: 630 KB, 960x1280, tumblr_nri78wUoy51tcb2bro1_1280.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8502599

>>8502590

>> No.8502602
File: 96 KB, 338x600, tumblr_nr58cogF1h1qhauwfo1_400.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8502602

>>8502593
This chick

>> No.8502604

>>8502590
I think this looks pretty cute, standard OTT sweet. The colors are balanced and the shades seem to match. At first I thought the bolero was lavender but I realized it's just sheer pink.

>> No.8502605

>>8502590
More like nitpick imo, the colour harmony is nice. I'd take away the bolero, that wrapping ribbon has to go.

>> No.8502609
File: 111 KB, 540x810, tumblr_nqvz7mciX11ssynfho2_540.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8502609

what

>> No.8502613

>>8502566
>>8502571
Careful now. This is Tumblr. And that's classist.

>> No.8502616

>>8502609
Her skirt looks like my mom's Christmas tablecloth.

>> No.8502618

>>8502616
Well it was handmade apparently so pretty possible

>> No.8502626
File: 123 KB, 618x1274, tumblr_nryvj21cwR1r75wj8o1_1280.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8502626

Has this been posted yet?

>> No.8502639
File: 544 KB, 1200x1600, tumblr_nrwt22QrCn1sysuhco1_1280.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8502639

middle finger so rori

>> No.8502641

>>8502590
vendetta/nitpick.

>> No.8502643

>>8502530
See, even the dog be like "Nope!"

>> No.8502644

>>8502639
is her dress on backwards?

>> No.8502655

>>8502641
>>8502597
>>8502604
>>8502605
Dang dudes okay I take it back. Maybe not as ita as I thought it was

>> No.8502657

>>8502609
Holiday Hobbit?

>> No.8502661

>>8502644
No. Front shirring used to be really common. Then people figured out that it's a recipe for boobloaf and it vanished for the most part.

I think a few Bodyline dresses still use it though. And Baby was particularly prone to it.

>> No.8502693

>>8502602
Wtf is THIS

>> No.8502697

>>8502576
I sure hope so.

>> No.8502701

>>8502609
That border print fabric would of made a cute skirt. Why the hell did she only use our for the front?

>> No.8502706

>>8502661
It only gives boobloaf if you have a proportionately big cup size. Otherwise it's fine. Friend and I have same front-shirred dress, I'm small cup, no boobloaf, she's amply endowed, it loafs.

>> No.8502722

>>8502706
I guess I've only ever seen girls with ample boobs wear it, then. It used to be the go-to when brands were a bit less generous on the back shirring, and a lot of larger lolitas were cramming the girls into front-shirred pieces as a result.

The weird lines the elastic makes in squishy boob tissue. I'll never forget that.

>> No.8502733

>>8502590
I like this. What exactly is the problem you have with it?

>> No.8502735

>>8502693
Kek and that's what everyone else was asking. She was brought up a couple of threads ago and keep us going for a good while because of her "coords" and just how buttblasted she got after someone tried to give her advice

Kinda reacted similar to >>8502534 above

>> No.8502756

>>8502590
This isn't even nitpick. Maybe change the blouse, but seriously cute as fuck.

>> No.8502769

>>8502733
I've since taken back what I said since with over whelming support of it maybe I've miscalculated my own taste bias with ita

My thing with it was all the clashing patterns and how the mint slightly doesn't match seems to throw me off.
>dark stripes on socks
>dull in comparison parasol
>no blouse
>white arm cuffs with no white anywhere else
The dotted mint top meeting with the plain mint part of the skirt seems off as well without anything in between. Then the bolero itself seems very cluttered with doesn't help with all that's going on with the rest of the outfit.

Just seems like cluttered OTT sweet vomit and not the good kind. As I said it could just be me since many others disagree, but it just looks like she took every mint and pink article in her closet and through it all together

>> No.8502771

>>8502537
This is more nitpick I'd say change the shoes and the tights it'd be a decent casual coord

>> No.8502789

>>8502769
Mint is probably the hardest color to coord because everything is a different shade of it. Some are too blue, too green, too light, too dark, and often it is a different shade than the photo. This is why I always give mismatching mints a pass, as opposed to pink or blue or white.

>> No.8502795

>>8502789
Brands need to start including Pantone numbers or hex codes in their product descriptions. We'd be saved so much grief if we could tell right off the bat if two mints or creams wouldn't match in real life.

>> No.8502807

>>8502795
This so hard. It should be a standard for online shopping in general.

>> No.8502835

>>8502795
You are the future.

>> No.8502888

>>8502639
2edgy5me

>> No.8502900

we need a 'lolita manual book'

>> No.8502904

>>8502795
>creams

oh god yes please, even IW can't match their own beiges.

>> No.8502907

>>8502900
we already have a guidebook, a handbook, and a bunch of blogs and facebook groups that deal with this kind of thing.

>> No.8502969

Hey gulls, ill be busy for the next day or two, and I feel my mod will be too. I'll try checking in a bit when I can and setting up a queue but it probs won't be too busy for a bit. Thanks for the positive feedback and the crit so far, keep it coming! Id love suggestions.

>> No.8503021
File: 170 KB, 459x527, kek.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8503021

>> No.8503025

>>8503021
I hate that sale page. Theres that one ita that tries to sell that horrific piano key skirt pos even though someone told her that ebay sells cheap knock offs

>she bought that pos for $100 bucks
>my sides

>> No.8503037
File: 144 KB, 494x259, cos.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8503037

>> No.8503060

>>8503037
>i dont want it to be costume
>but im gonna make it a costume

Girl what

>> No.8503096

>>8502795
>Hex-chan for president

>> No.8503101

>>8502534
>it's nobody else's business how I tag things, it's my blog!
>the sole purpose of tagging is so your post shows up when people search that term
>shitting up a tag actually affects everyone else using it
She could just stop tagging it and everyone would be happy.

>> No.8503108

>>8503021
>if it's a moi meme moitite dress

the fucking blasphemy

>> No.8503112
File: 638 KB, 1243x1920, tumblr_nrqovrwvgk1sop5h3o4_1280.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8503112

>> No.8503144

>>8503021
It looks to be inspired by both Atelier Boz and Atelier pierrot but that wasn't lolita enough so they added the yoke, bow and peter pan collar.

>> No.8503155
File: 594 KB, 1024x512, me__by_meeselax-d8w840j.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8503155

>Me in a lolita INSPIRED outfit <3 (I know this doesn't actually count as lolita) I thought I looked cute so... I'm posting this here ^w^ I felt really cute, photos were taken at my school btw uwu

>> No.8503161

>>8503060
Its like she doesn't want to be ita but doesn't fully understand what ita is

>> No.8503166

>>8503155
You could get cut on those bangs though poor kid

>> No.8503179
File: 119 KB, 640x960, lolita_modeling_by_ichi_yume_okashi-d9288df.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8503179

>> No.8503181
File: 90 KB, 615x960, girl_with_one_eye_fashion_show_by_asianpsylocke-d8vuslp.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8503181

>> No.8503183
File: 295 KB, 1095x730, montreal_harajuku_walk_2015_113_by_mrjechgo-d8vkw2z.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8503183

>> No.8503186
File: 129 KB, 480x640, lifestyle_lolita___candyland_by_manga_circus-d905987.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8503186

>> No.8503188
File: 156 KB, 731x1092, gothic_lolita_by_jayz3ro-d912oxm.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8503188

>> No.8503192
File: 167 KB, 535x1204, lifestyle_lolita___parisol_by_manga_circus-d90591v.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8503192

>> No.8503193

>>8502626
Almost looks like something KPP would wear.

>> No.8503194

>>8503183
It looks like second one from the right is wearing two mini hats...

>> No.8503195
File: 227 KB, 800x600, punk_lolita___lolita_fashion_by_cherushiibun-d8wnrpi.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8503195

>> No.8503196
File: 235 KB, 1094x730, sweet_lolita_by_eastwindcosplay-d8xan9h.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8503196

>> No.8503199
File: 401 KB, 900x600, ts6_f_195p9_by_falcona-d91zlf1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8503199

>The cast of the Lolito Fashion Show at Tsukino-Con 2015

>> No.8503200
File: 721 KB, 683x1024, 148f3b9dbda4f7499756c5c9221f9438-d88wo94.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8503200

>> No.8503201

>>8503188
I feel she's inspired by the "lolita" you see in anime etc.

>> No.8503202
File: 199 KB, 730x1095, goth_lolita_by_x_shadow_raven_x-d8dyqxq.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8503202

>> No.8503203
File: 200 KB, 730x1095, clockwork_lolita_original____2_by_kimikotan-d8rnnoj.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8503203

>> No.8503205
File: 158 KB, 774x1032, ohayocon_2015_11_by_tgrrr89-d8gsuxv.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8503205

>> No.8503206
File: 136 KB, 774x1032, adorable_lolita_costume_at_mccc_2015_by_krazykari-d8hh7zy.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8503206

>> No.8503207
File: 360 KB, 730x1095, montreal_harajuku_walk_2015_121_by_mrjechgo-d8vkvy8.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8503207

>> No.8503208
File: 127 KB, 786x1017, gearpunk_d_musical_circus_collection__lolita_twins_by_evamocek-d8k76ss.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8503208

>> No.8503209
File: 59 KB, 480x640, first_real_lolita_dress_by_dragon_hobbit101-d8kczui.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8503209

>> No.8503211
File: 185 KB, 774x1032, under_my_parasol_by_hairyhotdogs-d8ksu16.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8503211

>> No.8503212
File: 271 KB, 681x1000, egl1post9_by_sinnocentcosplay-d8l6wwm.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8503212

>> No.8503213
File: 36 KB, 400x533, lolita_style_by_yukaseiko-d8p606j.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8503213

>> No.8503214
File: 189 KB, 753x1061, 78371fe355962d77b6c468ec542ddce2-d8mh8yx.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8503214

>> No.8503218
File: 175 KB, 767x1042, wa_lolita_yubel_by_missjumpcity-d8uf6lv.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8503218

Not a real outfit but I think this deserves an honorary mention.

>> No.8503234
File: 49 KB, 540x960, 11755922_10205517350107180_3099242156865066476_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8503234

>> No.8503243
File: 102 KB, 960x960, 11745533_10206061729034960_8208285390955908836_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8503243

>> No.8503248

>>8503243
The long awaited Chanel shironuri

>> No.8503252

>>8502661
>used to
Isn't that AP's Cotton Candy Shop? That dress was released less than a year ago. But yeah, front shirring is ugly.

>> No.8503260

>>8503243
Well, it seems like she might have used the Minori shironuri tutorial. I feel like if she used contouring to make her face look less wide, it could be okay.

>> No.8503292

>>8503243
This actually makes her look better even though the application isn't great. Her face now looks less like plastic

>> No.8503301

>>8503243
I actually quite like this.
I just wish she would wear a different dress with it because there is so much more to ott than just wearing all items of the same color scheme.

>> No.8503335

>>8503243
Where did she post it? I like it.

>> No.8503352

>>8503037
Ita in the making. What Facebook group is this? I deleted my FB a while ago

>> No.8503371

>>8503243
Dat blouse gap

>> No.8503404

>>8502558
>>8502556
>>8502554
>>8502552
Set buttblasters to full, captain.

>> No.8503428
File: 189 KB, 585x445, 1437728701039.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8503428

>>8503218
I sort of like the print idea for a sweet-wa or the likes.
Not sure about the black

>> No.8503432
File: 283 KB, 1366x2048, fhg.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8503432

> self-proclaimed lifestyle lolita

>> No.8503436

>>8503428
Sorry for your shit taste
>>8503432
Clown-lita

>> No.8503455 [DELETED] 

>8503218
She looks like a villain from Power Rangers.

>> No.8503459

>>8503455
-> >>8503428

>> No.8503483

>>8503428
Sorry anon, but this design is some really deep weeb special snowflake shit.
I always have to remember how ten years ago in my own weeb phase everybody had those "edgy half-demon, half-angel" Mary Sue-tier OCs. They all had to be pure beautiful angels with a rad and crazy demonic side and a tragic backstory.

>> No.8503490

>>8503205
>Is that you E.T.?

>> No.8503491

>tfw you're a straight guy on a danish fish grooming subreddit learning to pick out flaws in australian islander attire

chocolatepudding.jpg

I don't cosplay or know anyone that cosplays either.

>> No.8503495

>>8502593
how is noor ita? yeah she has to wear religious covering+trousers but outside of that shes not ita at all

>> No.8503498

>>8503021
Is it bad I like the overall design of this? It kind of reminds me of something you'd find in Aikatsu or Pripara.

>> No.8503499

>>8503495

>she's not ita apart from the things that make her ita

>> No.8503511
File: 204 KB, 329x444, 1437285227224.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8503511

>>8503491
you lost anon? this isn't even a cosplay thread, this is a lolita thread where we laugh at itas

>> No.8503530

>>8503112
AAAAAAAAAAAaaaaaaaaaaAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

>> No.8503531

>>8503498
I sort of do too but then I can be a tacky piece of shit sometimes.

>> No.8503534

>>8503196
This one is hilarious to me for some reason fuck

>> No.8503564

>>8503196
It looks like Sebastian is trying to escape.

>> No.8503586

>>8503511
I clicked post before writing /wears lolita.

I'm scared at how good I'm getting at picking out ita.

>> No.8503596
File: 165 KB, 957x960, ass on the front tits on the back wtf.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8503596

>>8503432
Granlita?

>> No.8503601

>>8503112
Where are those leggings from though?

>> No.8503603

>>8503586
One of us, anon. One of us.

>> No.8503609

>>8503603
Noooooooo! I just like seeing cute girls dress well!

>> No.8503611

>>8503491
It's not really limited to Australia, actually, alrought there are some famous lolitas from there. And its not cosplay.

>> No.8503615

>>8503499
Religious coverings are not inherently ita...

>> No.8503617

>>8503611
>not picking up on the intentionally incorrect country of origin joke

/cgl/ is like it's own little website, somehow shielded from 4chan memes.

>> No.8503618

>>8503611
Never mind I see your cosplay amendment.

>> No.8503620

>>8503617
Yeah I never use actual 4chan, cgl is like an island.

>> No.8503623

>>8502795
You're going to save the future of lolita

>> No.8503627

>>8503207
All eyes are on her.

>> No.8503631

>>8502590
I see nothing wrong with this. It looks like an AP shop blog coordinate photo judging by the fabric in the back and the color/lighting and the size of the image.

If this is an AP blog photo: Japanese lolitas are less nit-picky about these kinds of things than the west is. Somehow we've trained ourselves to have everything match down the hex code 100% or it's automatically ita.

If anything, this is a nitpick.

>>8503199
Nothing even remotely lolita here. It's just cosplay? Even a gaggle of Milanoo/Bodyline itas would've been closer than this.

>> No.8503632

>>8503615

Then why do they always look like shit?

>> No.8503637
File: 107 KB, 332x389, image:139840.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8503637

>>8503199
>Lolito

>> No.8503659
File: 1.00 MB, 749x539, my little landwhale.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8503659

I cannot fucking wait to see this being worn.

>> No.8503671

>>8502534
Wah wah elistist wah wah wah. That is how I read these ita tumblrina posts.
Bitch shouldn't add the wrong tags, hope they keep bothering her haha.

>> No.8503682

>>8502552
>>8502554
>>8502556
>>8502558

I can smell the butthurt from here lol.
Guess the truth hurts.
Thanks for posting anon.

>> No.8503689

>>8503243

Despite it not being very good she looks actually kinda cute here. Maybe cause the make-up is matte and doesn't have that "melted" face look she usually has?

>> No.8503691

>>8503596
I'll bet she stank.

>> No.8503692

>>8503615
Pants are, though.

>> No.8503693

>>8503243
She definitely needs a different foundation and coordinate but at least her face looks more like a face now. Like, she's almost kind of pretty.

>> No.8503699

>>8503243
This reminds me of that reaction picture of the black guy looking at his phone then look at the audience.

>> No.8503701
File: 346 KB, 391x534, sweet devil.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8503701

>>8503021
Reminds me of a horribly ita version of Sweet Devil.

>> No.8503716

>>8502795
There's actually a device that allows you to read a pantone code for real life colors. It costs like $700 but I want it so hard. No more mismatching and "color not as described".

>> No.8503719

>>8502626
this is a cosplay...

>> No.8503722

>>8503483
Ugh now I want an ita OC art thread

>> No.8503737

>>8503693
You kidding right? she looks like a wardenburg syndrome potato? I feel like punching her fucking munted eyes to far apart face in.

>> No.8503739

>>8503596
WHY DOES SHE HAVE A BUTT UP FRONT

>> No.8503740

>>8503483
Oh man I am so guilty, I'm cringing so hard my shoulders are stiff now.
>tfw had a yaoi OC couple of an angel and a demon and how forbidden their relationship was
>not because gay
>because unholy

>> No.8503755

>>8502655
Don't take it back.
You were right

>> No.8503759

>>8503195
She's so pretty, what a shame.

>> No.8503773

>>8502795
This would be incredible honestly. I love lavender and I think AP has had like 80 different shades of lavender in the past year. It's so frustrating.

>> No.8503777

>>8503181
Did they run out of fabric halfway through or something?

>> No.8503780

>>8503659
The proportions on this look disgusting.

>> No.8503784

>>8503596
How does she go out wearing shorts? The chafing must be unbearable.

>> No.8503787

>>8503740
>tfwiktf

>> No.8503801

>>8503615
No. But wearing pants under a dress is ita.
There's this other fairly well-known muslim girl who wears boots with her coords, you can make it work.

>> No.8503850

>>8503195

I don't know why but I kind of like this

>> No.8503861

>>8503615
You can still be covered by wearing leggings or opaque tights. Don't use religion as an excuse to be lazy or sloppy.

>> No.8503945

>>8503234
This is an Annie cosplay. Since she's holding a poro I doubt she's trying to be lolita

>> No.8503957

>>8503861
But isn't it supposed to be loose on the body? Like that's why that girl wore boots instead of something as form-fitting as leggings?

>> No.8503961

>>8503957
Being loose on the body does not work with the lolita aesthetic. Maybe girls should look for something else to feel pretty in. Ankle length dresses or just pants for example.

>> No.8503971
File: 146 KB, 423x640, twinke_journey_replica.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8503971

This is a replica. In her defense she didn't say she was planning to wear this on the street and was just trying on the dress, but she called it a coord...

>> No.8503973

>>8503961
I understand that. What I meant is, maybe that girl wears knee-high boots to avoid tights or leggings. I apologise for being unclear.

>> No.8503975

>>8503971
I had socks like those when I was 13. I wore them everywhere.
But why taint Twinkle Journey like that.

>> No.8503990
File: 95 KB, 480x640, 11702720_10153561273970152_7644398173616246484_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8503990

>> No.8503991

>>8503990
bedsheets so kawaii

>> No.8503998

>>8503975
Same here, anon.
>tfw bought a second pair and cut holes in the ends to make armwarmers
>thought I was so cool

>> No.8504018
File: 223 KB, 958x709, aziraphale_and_crowley_by_jdillon82.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8504018

>>8503740
>>8503787
Go and read Good Omens if you haven't already, anons.

>> No.8504035

>>8503352
Rufflechat. Not surprised.

>> No.8504038

>>8503990
Muumuu-kei

>> No.8504042

>>8503205
Oof. And this is why I only wear that blouse with a jsk.

>> No.8504044
File: 29 KB, 500x475, you-tried.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8504044

>>8503205

>> No.8504049

>>8502530
this girl is dutch, I wish I knew who she was.

>> No.8504056

>>8503252
Shit, seriously? I don't pay much attention to AP, so I thought it was an older piece. I hope front shirring doesn't make a come back.

>> No.8504066

>>8504018
Seconding this. a really great take on the whole over done angel/demon apocalyse plot. I've cosplayed from it.
Sage for OT

>> No.8504073

>>8504049
She's new to lolita, mostly a cosplayer. Goes by The Rat Lover Cosplay.
>I recognized the castle behind her and hunted her down on FB but I'm not a stalker I swear

>> No.8504113

>>8503207
what an unfortunate appearance.

>> No.8504131

>>8503112
Those gloves look like the ones you use for medical probes and shit.
I-I'm afraid...

>> No.8504155

>>8503112
I get the feeling this was supposed to be ero or have an ero-like vibe. But this is ero gone very wrong

>> No.8504174

>>8503183
this fully embodies the term "ita"

>> No.8504179

>>8503195
id say works for gothic. more of a nitpick. not ita

>> No.8504199

>>8503112
cheap pleather meets lolita.

>> No.8504204

>>8503208
I don't care if this is ita, I appreciate how clean and wrinkle free all of this looks

>> No.8504206

>>8502537
Scrolled down the page like "Ok, could use a wig, basic coord, fine for a beginn-- WHAT ARE THOOOOOOOSE"

>> No.8504209

>>8503701
I've always thought Sweet Devil always looked like a bit of a ita-tastic mess tbh. It's got nice elements, but goes too far. I find it hard to believe that it's sold on lacemarket for over $1,300. http://www.lacemarket.us/anp-sweet-devil-jsk/

>> No.8504215

>>8503596
wow. as a fattychan this makes me feel just a little bit nice about myself...in that I know what my body is like and don't try to cram myself into clothes that seriously don't fit, wtf. I can never understand other fat people who do this. It's not comfortable wearing ill-fitting clothes at all, you feel and look awful...

>> No.8504222
File: 292 KB, 436x462, punishment by ita pussy.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8504222

>>8503432

>> No.8504229

>>8502530
That corgi looks just like one of my corgis.

>> No.8504244

>>8503179
>see on mobile
>pretty cute imo, needs legwear tho
>see again on desktop
>oh.

>> No.8504253

>>8503243
I agree with some of the others in that she looks surprinsingly nice here, I guess it's because her foundation doesn't look like her face is melting. Eye makeup needs more blending and sharper details but tbh isn't too bad for Chanel. wish there was a better wig too.

I think this just goes to show that if chanel actually tries and puts the effort in instead of just slapping things on, she has the potential to look nice.

>> No.8504410

>>8502554
>"YET YOU REBLOGGED THEIR SHIT"
Exactly.
It's shit that's why it was reblogged.

>> No.8504533

>>8502602
Ugh she's so frustrating, her sewing skills are decent and I like the idea of her design here, but the cheap lace and the plain button-down and lack of styling is so unfortunate

>>8503155
the kawaii weeb pose in the third frame is making me rage a lil
>>8503248
>chanelnuri

>> No.8504547
File: 44 KB, 388x607, 11760331_1629498717295159_3214825195209884113_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8504547

>> No.8504582

>>8504547
Dead horse anon, dead horse.

>> No.8504598

>>8503203
This could be really good if it was done properly and made by someone who understood the concept of irons.

>> No.8504615

>>8503491
Now I'm curious about fish grooming.

>> No.8504630

>>8503211
I like this kind of lace parasols in black but I think s lot of people don't.

>> No.8504770

>>8502602
she made that herself right? she's a decent seamstress, but god that fabric choice...
i wish she had better taste because she could be a decent handmade lolita
also the jeans under her coord are bugging me. you can maintain modesty without pants.
i live in an area with a high muslim population and have seen more hijabi wearing leggings or sometimes even opaque tights to maintain modesty. and increasingly i'm seeing girls leaving their arms below the elbow uncovered, so maybe hime sleeves would be ok?

>> No.8504778

>>8503601

Are they actually leggings though or weird thigh high boots?

>> No.8504784

>>8503199
Does anyone else see Benny Hill at the back?

>> No.8504786

>>8503213
Is that a soother? Lolita adult baby anyone?

>> No.8504804
File: 2.21 MB, 1926x1266, Screen Shot 2015-07-24 at 4.28.26 PM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8504804

This girl has tons of brand and always looks like an ita. I think it might just be her weird young-old granny face, if she wore some makeup and found things that actually fit her instead...

>> No.8504860
File: 104 KB, 1280x720, doctor who - chantho.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8504860

>>8503243

>> No.8504865

>>8503596
Is her arse on backwards?

>> No.8504875

>>8503659
So I see Rainbow Trash, Twishite Sparkle and that annoying pink one, where are the other 3?

>> No.8504883

>>8504073
Does The Rat Lover refer to her dog?

>> No.8504893

Does anyone have pics of Irish itas?

>> No.8504895

>>8503740

Don't regret it. Embrace it.

Also thirding >>8504018. Because aside from the angel/demon action, it's just a great book.

>> No.8504916
File: 74 KB, 621x480, ita - leigh3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8504916

Have an Irish ita

>> No.8505013
File: 92 KB, 560x391, 2091051_lookbook9.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8505013

>> No.8505025
File: 29 KB, 500x375, 1429328607195.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8505025

>>8504916
That person could not seriously think this is lolita?

>> No.8505051

>>8504916
Oh no you don't. You keep your autism shitstorms in your containment general.

>> No.8505065

>>8505013
I want to like this tho...

>> No.8505083

>>8504916
FECK SAKE STOP POTSYPOSTING OUTSIDE OF THE THREAD
She's our cross to bear, don't torture the innocents

>> No.8505088
File: 135 KB, 1366x2048, FB_IMG_1437787295851.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8505088

>> No.8505096

>>8505088
Is it... a bedsheet?

>> No.8505124
File: 89 KB, 720x960, FB_IMG_1437788471756.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8505124

>> No.8505127
File: 95 KB, 720x960, FB_IMG_1437788464716.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8505127

>> No.8505157
File: 121 KB, 540x720, what.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8505157

>> No.8505160
File: 63 KB, 528x704, tumblr_ns0mhr3qyw1uc33hno1_540.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8505160

>>8505157

So much on tumblr today.

>> No.8505161
File: 111 KB, 272x324, Arse_in_sight.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8505161

>>8505124

>> No.8505162
File: 42 KB, 528x704, tumblr_ns0mhr3qyw1uc33hno2_540.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8505162

>>8505160

>> No.8505165

>>8505127
even though I hate the non matching socks, i think this is more of a nitpick, rather than ita

>> No.8505176
File: 686 KB, 908x710, Screen Shot 2015-07-24 at 9.10.11 PM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8505176

>>8505162

Someone wearing fucking jellies with dollar store ribbon with their lolita.

>> No.8505183

>>8505160
'tis con season

>> No.8505224

>>8505162
I'm 90% sure I know who this is.

>> No.8505271

>>8503112
Well. I like this more than some of the other recent ero lolita coords.

>> No.8505292

>>8505025
That person is an autistic Irish SJW tranny, of course she thinks its lolita

>>8505083
But there's no Irish thread to post in ATM

>> No.8505301
File: 20 KB, 1280x720, ita - missiechan1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8505301

>>8504916
Fuck off

If want Irish ita look no further than PissieChan

>> No.8505304

>>8504916
>>8505083
>>8505292
>>8505301

Sometimes I seriously wonder who's posting all of this. I have my suspicions though.

>> No.8505308

>>8505292
>But there's no Irish thread to post in ATM
>>8505093

>> No.8505315

>>8503990
In defense of this, the girl said it was unfinished and she does plan on using something to add definition to the waist. I think the finished coordinate will look somewhat chemise-like.

>> No.8505321

>>8505304
HRH Queen Amy of course

>> No.8505339

>>8505321

The post would be far less grammatically impressive, to put it mildly.

>> No.8505367

>>8504770
I think someone called this out about 'making it', saying they had the same dress but that she had just added the colorful trim.

>> No.8505416

>>8503659
This was posted on fb, where someone commented "it's super cute!" on it, and someone else responded, "its super not"

>> No.8505421

>>8505124
I think this is cute for casual.

>> No.8505430

>>8505416
That's amazing.

>> No.8505476

>>8505124
Why would you ever wear a lolita skirt on your hips like that?

>> No.8505481

>>8505124
Gotta laugh at the fat guy mirin her ass.

>> No.8505482

>>8505416
Caps?

>> No.8505487

>>8505476
she looks like she might be too small for it to sit where it's supposed to

>> No.8505772

>>8504875
Apple Horse is always igored in merch, and Best Pony wouldn't be caught dead on that hideous fabric. Flittertwat... who cares.

>> No.8505773
File: 124 KB, 283x280, My_eyes.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8505773

>>8505160

>> No.8505778

>>8504875
>that annoying pink one
you mean pinkie papsmear

>> No.8505783
File: 801 KB, 726x1332, Screen Shot 2015-07-25 at 3.04.48 AM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8505783

>>8505482
Your wish is my command!
Forgot about the guy saying she's too fat for it.

>> No.8505795

>>8502697
yeah the blues are too light

>> No.8505800

>>8503243Oh my god her eyes.

>> No.8505808
File: 906 KB, 245x193, tumblr_ne3mw5iW6O1rfduvxo1_250.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8505808

>>8505783

>> No.8505980

>>8505476
It doesn't even look like it's on her hips, just awkwardly in the middle.
Tighten those fucking waist ties, girl.

>> No.8505989

>>8505088
She could have been alright despite her size and questionable dye job, if it wasn't for the peignoir thing she's wearing.

>> No.8506029

>>8504038
Kekked.

>> No.8506065

>>8505783

Someone making something according to your measurements isn't a guarantee that it'll fit and that they're not a shit seamstress

>> No.8506070

>>8505783
This looks like ageplay. Also was this posted in a Facebook comm? If so which one? I don't have a Facebook, sorry.

>> No.8506186
File: 166 KB, 640x852, tumblr_ns0p8bX6Ru1une54ro1_1280.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8506186

that makeup

>> No.8506252
File: 105 KB, 720x710, 18407_692347387536664_2548809110454463548_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8506252

New photo for GLW. Jesus fucking christ. I couldn't even tell it was Lor until I read the description. What the hell did they do to her face?

>> No.8506253

>>8506252
holy fuck, their whole makeup team should be fired, along with whoever picked out that weird ass blue filter to put on this incredibly unflattering photo.
>never saw why anons thought lor was ugly
>tfw i see now
>i see everything

>> No.8506257

>>8506253
honestly the more i look at the photo the more she looks like a drag queen. like what the hell are those lashes and eyebrows.

>> No.8506260

>>8506252
I couldn't even tell this was lor and I actually really like her... Wow

>> No.8506264

>>8502795
I feel this so bad.
I spend overs on photoshop putting stock images next to each other, just in hopes I can even come close to matching, praying that the stock pictures of color correct. It's so hard when things are taken in different lighting too.

>> No.8506268

>>8505157
I don't hate this and I have no idea why.

God, is pastel vomit my leopard print?

>> No.8506276

>>8505783
Tbh both dudes look like edgy fedorakuns who get off neggin' a fattie on the internet when in reality they look no better themselves.

Where was this posted btw?

>> No.8506290

>>8505124
when I first saw this I had to do a double take, she kinda looks like me circa 8 years ago, highschool...

>> No.8506293

>>8506257
It's the lips that get me. Whyyyyy

>> No.8506301

>>8506252
I really want to make a blog of all Lor's pictures but with her nose photoshopped to not be jewy

>> No.8506304

>>8505124
This is the type of girl that I feel like if we saw her timeline in like 6 years she probably would have improved drastically.

>> No.8506341

>>8503192
>parisol

>> No.8506400

>>8506252
>those eyebrows
>that nose shoop
>that eyeshadow
what the fuck, I never would have guessed it was her. What a joke.

>> No.8506405

>>8502795
This. I legitimately have 10 different red cardigans, NONE of them are the same shade of red, NONE of them match exactly with one of my red dresses. I have absolutely given up on monochromatic outfits, it's just not happening.

>> No.8506584

>>8503659
First I wondered why this was proportioned like toddler dress then I noticed that headbow.

>> No.8506604

>>8506252
>>8506253

GLW doesn't do scene photos....they have a standard white/grey background if they take the photos

>> No.8506615

>>8506584
JFC O_O

>> No.8506618 [DELETED] 

>>8503025
I got that thing for like $20, geez. I like it, but it ain't worth $100. It's not even lolita...

>> No.8506622

>>8505989
aw i like her hair.

I've always wanted grey purple hair..

>> No.8506627

>>8506604
Have you not seen the other photos they released of her? These are from them. It was posted by their makeup artist.

>> No.8506628
File: 299 KB, 445x450, 1437551323338.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8506628

>>8506615
>>8506584
>spoilers on cgl
>emoticon on 4chan

>> No.8506633
File: 59 KB, 600x600, gothic160_big.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8506633

>>8506628
>giving a shit

>> No.8506635

>>8506628
Someone apparently just came from the reactions thread.

>> No.8506656

>>8506622
It just looks like washed out purple hair.

>> No.8506658

>>8506604
Lor shared it on her facebook page earlier today. The description is
"New photo from Gothic Lolita Wigs!!
Lovely Lor wearing the rainbow rhapsody wig
Photography by Sequoia Emmanuelle Photography
Makeup Artistry by Kimberly Young Makeup Artist
eyelashes by Dolluxe"

>makeup artistry
Kek

>> No.8506675
File: 70 KB, 720x960, GLW Shooting.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8506675

>>8506627
>>8506658

Marc Harvey/Henry does their makeup lol...If the girls don't go to Houston to get their photos done, the girls have the option to get their own photos done by their choice of photographer..


Pic related is how GLW does their photos by THEIR in house photography. Lor used her own shit.

>> No.8506713

>>8503243
I did not scroll down far enough after enlarging the picture and I legit thought that the face on the left was a Styrofoam wig head

>> No.8506758

>>8506658
>rainbow rhapsody wig
as if it wasn't bad enough in solid colors

>> No.8506765

>>8506252
Lor what the fuck why would you agree to this

I'm also really disappointed that she's supporting GLW.

>> No.8506774

>>8506765
Maybe her makeup is shit because she didn't want anyone to recognize her. I mean, she's under a contract, right?

>> No.8506794

>>8506252
When I saw the crown I was like oh that's Lor bc she wears that so often. Did she ever actually say anything about the GLW fiasco?

>> No.8506795

>>8503183
This is what I think of when I imagine tumblr lolitas.

>> No.8506800

>>8503208
This is cute enough as long as they don't think it's lolita or call it lolita.

>> No.8506801

>>8503701
Can't unsee

>> No.8506802

>>8503243
triggered

oh wait

whiteface isn't a thing

>> No.8506807

>>8506252
Wow this is awful. I hoped Lor wouldn't jump on a company's dick for free wigs or whatever. Oh well.

>> No.8506826

>>8502639
Oh my god, those eyebrows don't really go well with blonde. Holy shit.

>> No.8506841

>>8503432
those look like fucking jazz shoes

>> No.8506912
File: 89 KB, 416x546, 2004476_4f560c7bd535cf05fc00001f.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8506912

I hate everything about this.

>> No.8506915

>>8504073
Wasn't she the girl who was freaked out because of a moth?

>> No.8506935
File: 882 KB, 1920x2560, 1437449521150~2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8506935

Saw this in another thread.... This girl claims she isnt wearing a petti and I see much more wrong here >-<

>> No.8506953

>>8506935
> >-<
Lurk more.

Also this isn't entirely awful, but the rhs don't feel quite right with this particular dress. Lower, standard enough pumps and maybe a nice accessory for the neckline would do wonders here.

>> No.8506967

>>8506658
>>8506765
She was so vague when people asked her about it on tumblr, and now this? Really disappointed. I guess she'd rather not speak up if she gets free shit.

>> No.8506995

>>8506953
Agreed. Lurk more, stopped being underage, or both.

Different shoes and some makeup would really help this out. It has potential.

>> No.8507061

>>8506912
It looks like the dress was photoshopped on and not like she's actually wearing it

>> No.8507066

>>8506935
Kinda got some old school country to it.

Not to be harsh but is she pregnant?

>> No.8507091

>>8506967
I'm really, really disappointed in her. I knew having an e-famous Lolita who wasn't fake was too good to be true.

>> No.8507150
File: 195 KB, 750x1334, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8507150

Found on IG. She wore this in a fashion show.

>> No.8507155

>>8507150
Please god don't let bustier bras as a top be a thing now.

>> No.8507166

>>8507150
This is such trash, she's literally just wearing underwear.

>> No.8507169

>>8506841
I can't even begin with this 'coord'

>> No.8507177

>>8506967
>>8507091
She might be under an NDA/contract.

>> No.8507204

>>8507150
Did she alter Dream Fantasy into a skirt, or what? It was a luckypack print...

>> No.8508421

>>8506252

She looks like more of a transvestite than usual.

>> No.8508764
File: 103 KB, 720x960, 11707508_1252140124802731_896186412158556698_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8508764

>>8503659

>> No.8508768
File: 71 KB, 540x960, 11781798_1252126708137406_1430384913785887090_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8508768

>>8508764

>> No.8509069

>>8508764
>>8508768
This has to be ageplay... there's no way she can think this is lolita.

>> No.8509106

>>8509069
Sadly she does, it was even posted to the Positive & Plus size lolita group.

>I had to share what pure joy looks like who cares if it's ita I my new pony dress

>> No.8509164

>>8503112
DAT BLOUSE. where to cop?

>> No.8509258

>>8503990
This looks like a nightgown.

>>8505013
This would be 100% improved with different shoes.

>> No.8509496

>>8508768
Why does anyone, especially fat girls, take photos at this angle? It's never flattering, especially not if you have a double chin

>> No.8509562
File: 468 KB, 500x200, 1420614863465.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8509562

>>8508768
>turning 21
>wearing what is basically an ageplay dress

>> No.8509897
File: 117 KB, 960x720, 11012703_1582607602013382_3339203972042855392_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8509897

>> No.8511177

>>8503037
I wonder if this is the same person who posted on btb

>> No.8511184

>>8503243
she looks like a clown with a bonnet and pastel hair

>> No.8511867

>>8509106
>>8508768
This is what pure joy looks like? good god