/cgl/ - Cosplay & EGL

Oh look it's this thread again.

And here, we see the remains of what appears to be a beta in its natural habitat.

im trying to upset the grills on 4chan with my 1337 trolling skillz

huehuehuehue

>>7762500
Does anyone have the unshooped version of this where she actually looks like a train wreck?

Jesus fuck, she's so shooped that she doesn't even look human anymore.

Also: not all fictional characters have their tits and asses hanging out. The girls who choose slutty characters are expected to act like bimbos anyway and it shouldn't really surprise anyone that they get uppity and loud to try and attract even more attention when they catch you looking at their bare tits.

>>7762500
Because it shouldn't matter how much any gender is wearing. You're opening gambit shouldn't be objectifying or overtly sexual.

Why do people have no manners or respect for others personal boundaries?

>>7762539
Youre out at a social event in public. If you want boundaries, stay home.

>>7762500
>How dare you! We are cosplaying our favourite characters! You bigot!
Just like this picture!
>Cosplaying a character from a game not released based on a single trailer.
>We are such fans of the stuff too! We have as much right to call ourselves geeks!
I hate this shit.

>>7762541
boundaries are a specific part of convention rules you fucking retard.

>>7762548
No it isn't.

>>7762500
true, unless the guy hitting on them is a ripped alpha

>>7762548
Boundaries are based on many things though - social convention via the context of the situation. Morals and ethics of people concerned - which fluctuate on "who" is pushing the boundaries. No girl complains if a hot Prince Charming is being a creep.

>>7762541
>>7762548
>>7762552

It is up to each individual to set their comfort zone. It may fluctuate based on their confidence and where they are but that's their choice.

No one complains if a hot person is showing them interest. Until either that person turns out to be boring, annoying, inept or some other negative unattractive adjective.

Whether someome is at a convention, a beach, a library or their own home. It doesn't give you the right to make assumptions about their boundaries, both physical and mental.

It's called good manners to establish a connection through conversation first.

>>7762556
Sorry princess, but your "boundaries" don't mean shit. When you're in public a person can say things to say, stand next to you, or do whatever they feel. Unless they are committing a crime, you don't get to tell another person how they get to act.

It is not anyone's responsibility to make you comfortable. Expecting it to be is called entitlement.

>>7762500
Because no one should actually get treated like a walking sex object. I'm not expecting people to just magically forget someone is wearing something extremely revealing (nice though that would be), but some basic human decency about backing the fuck up if their advances are rejected would be nice. But hey, if this means I can start calling shirtless men whores...

>why am I even bothering to reply in a troll thread

>>7762560
>want attention as a sex object
>"Im not a sex object"

Woman logic

>>7762500
>Oh look, a guy getting butthurt because a woman told him no.

Even if she is sexualizing herself it doesn't mean she has to fuck you, or any of your neckbeard friends OP. Her slutty outfit doesn't magically take away her rights. Ain't that some shit?

>>7762563
What rights are we talking about? The right not to be approached by men you aren't attracted to? The right to never feel uncomfortable in public?

These are not rights. These are expectations to be pampered. Nobody is required to fulfill your desires. Especially when you're trying to control others.

real alphas don't give a fuck

stay in your caves low test beta males

>>7762561
You know what, if some women want that, good for them. But again, that's hardly grounds for anyone going over to someone and sexually harassing them. Which, you know, actually is a crime.

>>7762565
>What rights are we talking about?

The right to tell you
>Excuse me anon but your sexual advances are not appreciated just because I'm dressed in a way that makes you think I'd fuck you when I most certainly wouldn't, now get out of here before I alert con security.

Public harassment is still harassment even if you think the person in question is asking for it. If they don't want you around then you shoo.

>>7762571
Do you even know what sexual harassment is? Or do you just like invoking that term in the hopes you can make any interaction you don't like a crime?

Britbong rehash shit post thread #10^32

>this whole thread

>>7762575
So in other words, youre stupid and don't understand sexualizing yourself invites sexuality.

>>7762580
>asian with barely visible eyebrows
2spooky

I don't mind any of those things as long as the guy isn't an ugly virgin.

>>7762583
What if he's a sexy virgin?

>>7762583
what if he's just ugly and not a virgin

or a hot virgin

>>7762581
Are you so dumb that you cannot grasp that someone's actions doesn't necessarily justify them being sexually harassed?
>implying I do slutty cosplays
I hate these attention whores just as much as you do, but I have no interest in making piss poor arguments against them because I don't wish to fuck them like you obv do :^)

>>7762586

he's underage

true alphas lose it before they hit 14

>>7762586
>>7762587
They can't be virgins and can't be ugly.

>>7762588
He doesn't actually care.

So much fucking SJW bullshit on cgl.

If you don't want attention don't dress for it. But the truth is that do want the attention, not not from certain "creepers"

>>7762595
*If you don't want attention don't dress for it. But the truth is that YOU do want the attention, JUST not from certain "creepers"

>>7762592
>>7762593
what if they were ugly before and then Neville Longbottom'd in their late teens / early twenties

Why is /cgl/ so easily trolled?
Stop replying you faggots. We have threads like this every other day and they're always the same.

>>7762595

they want attention
but not harassment

>>7762595
They want the sexual attention, but they just want you to admire them sexually from afar. Like adorning yourself in raw steaks, standing next to a tiger cage and watch the tigers inside drool over your steak dress.

>>7762594
Sure he doesn't...
>hurrdurfff I'm just b8ing gies u dum dum cgl sjw sluts n hoes XD XD XD

>>7762601
great example is pic related

I went from a 4/10 to an 8/10

>>7762604
Harassment involves intimidation or force. Talking to you is not harassment, regardless of your approval rating.

>>7762603
>trolled
>implying we just don't like arguing and taking the piss out of r9k raids
Why do you stay?

>>7762559
By that logic, it's entitlement to be able to say what you like to whomever without repercussion.

That's also called being tactless.

It's a cyclic argument. But a world built on mutual respect is better than one where we can walk all over each other because we think we can.

All individuals are entitled to set their own boundaries.

To take your logic to the extremes. A murder victim was being entitled by expecting others not to kill them. A rape victim was being entitled expecting not to be raped. A victim of bullying was being entitled by expecting not to be bullied. A victim of harassment was being entitled to expect not to be harassed.

Different ends of the same scale.

Now that's not to say that 'victims' don't dramaticise or jump to conclusions themselves. An ugly person just trying to be nice gets written off as a creep when a good looking person doing the same gets a smile and a phone number. That's not right either.

But we do live in a sex fueled society where we use our initial primary input, being the visual of a person, to form a lasting opinion in seconds that could, very easily, be wrong. Then the argument is that you react based on experience, based on the majority. Experience and caution begets routine. Can't win that way either.

Because we don't live in a world based on mutual respect you can't approach everyone the same way and expect the same reaction regardless of what you look like or where you are.

>>7762612

>>7762500

>>7762612
You're doing exactly what they want you to do, though. Both sides are repeating the same shit over and over and thinking LEL I TROLLD DEM while the thread goes nowhere. It's kind of depressing to see this is the most active thread on /cgl/ right now.

>>7762613
>By that logic, it's entitlement to be able to say what you like to whomever without repercussion.
Yes, it is entitlement. That entitlement is called freedom of speech. Something feminists hate.

>>7762615
>just because I'm dressed this way doesn't make me a thug

So in summary.

Person A is wearing a sexy outfit

Person B finds person A very sexy.

So Person B expects to be able to have the right to approach Person A.

This is fine.

Person B makes initial conversation with Person A.

Also fine.

At which point Person A can either choose to continue the conversation. Or say no thank you in a contextually appropriate way and leave. This can occur at any stage, whether the conversation has progressed or not.

Just as Person B might discover upon talking to Person A that what comes out of their mouth is not as attractive as the rest of them and may choose to exit the conversation and beet a hasty retreat.

All of these scenarios are okay.

Either Person A or Person B will be left feeling rejected or uncomfortable if they don't get on.

But the part that isn't okay is that, if either party has said 'no thank you' in some way that the other pursues.

Either in a mopy way, a passive aggressive way, an aggressive way, an online way, any way.

Expecting no to mean no is not entitlement. It's a dictionary definition.

So can all of you who are trying to shame others into shutting up by calling them Princess, entitled, expectant, spoiled stop and understand that it's okay for you to make a move but if they say no that's just life and move the fuck on?

>>7762623

>>7762609
Eww what? 2/10 to 5/10.

>>7762617
>You're doing exactly what they want you to do

>robots spend the entire day complaining about sluts and attention whores
>giving them exactly what they want
>nobody says shit about that though

OP and fellow ilk are the most pathetic no matter how you split it, sorry.

>>7762618
The freedom of speech movement is about stopping oppression.

It's not a shield for tactless behaviour.

Also I should point out that I keep using gender and sexuality neutral examples. You're boxing yourself in anon by referring to feminism and women as a whole. This kind of behaviour is relevant to men too and to homosexuals, heterosexuals and the entire spectrum in between.

Having the entitlement of free speech isn't the same as acting entitled. That's like saying that everyone acts entitled because they have civil rights.

>>7762609
lmao no he looks shitty in both. You guys are really delusional if you think that's an 8.

>>7762618
Also my using derogatory terminology you are using oppression in your argument which contradicts the freedom of speech movement which means your argument contradicts itself.

If you must argue and debate anon, please learn how.

>>7762626
All men are beautiful. Stop your misandry.

>>7762623
OP isn't saying things like that should happen, he's saying they do and probably will happen, especially if the girl dresses skimpily/sexually. Expecting them not to happen, not being prepared, and being surprised and hurt by it are extremely foolish.

You can yell cosplay=/=consent all day long, but there will always be those people who simply do not give a single shit about you or your boundaries. The Alphas are the scarier ones too. I've even seen some feel posts about girls getting lied to and pumped and dumped at cons by them.

>>7762629
You don't seem to understand. People ARE entitled to say whatever they want without repercussions. By claiming that people should be reprimanded for what they say you are championing socialism. You literally want people thrown in jail for feeling they were rude to you.

>>7762559

Your argument is a pile of shit. "Standing next to" or "commenting" isn't crossing any boundaries and no one is trying to say they are.

But if you get up in someone's business and they make it clear that your attention is unwelcome, then it can become harassment. It doesn't fucking matter how a person is dressed.
Yeah, women dress like that for attention, but just like how everything else in life is selective, so is this. If they aren't attracted to you, whether they're in sweatpants or a fucking bikini, get it through your skull that the woman owes you NOTHING and get the fuck over it. Maybe if you faggots actually treated a woman with respect, maybe then betas, youu
Maybe if you faggots weren't so busy trying to justify your blatant disrespect you would actually have a girlfriend and this conversation wouldn't be happening. And you pathetic fucks wonder why you're single.

>>7762638

>>7762636
>People ARE entitled to say whatever they want without repercussions.

>>7762640
With what? The smell of the old smegma that got stuck under your foreskin that last time you whacked off to bad hentai?

>>7762641
Haha.
Legionfags are the worst.

>>7762638
How about I welcome my fist into your face, you uppity spoiled bitch.

This is why men use roofies to get laid. It's just easier than dealing with all this shit.

>Show off your tits
>Get offended when someone says "nice tits"

What you really want is a generic comment like "you look great", "you really suit that costume" or whatever

Even though you know that what they really mean when they say that is "nice tits".

>>7762634
I'm not specifying about cosplay. Mode of dress doesn't equal consent. That should be a fact.

All this talk just reminds of a scene from the movie Made in Dagenham, which is about the lead up to the Equal Pay Act in 1970. Characters are husband and wife.

Eddie O'Grady: Christ, I like a drink, but I ain't out on the beer every night or screwin' other women, or... 'Ere, I've never once raised me hand to you. Ever. Or the kids.

Rita O'Grady: Christ.

Eddie O'Grady: What? Why are you looking like that?

Rita O'Grady: Right. You're a saint now, is that what you're tellin' me, Eddie? You're a bleedin' saint? 'Cause you give us an even break?

Eddie O'Grady: What are you saying?

Rita O'Grady: That is as it should be. Jesus, Eddie! What do you think this strike's all been about, eh? Oh yeah. Actually you're right. You don't go on the drink, do ya? You don't gamble, you join in with the kids, you don't knock us about. Oh, lucky me. For Christ's sake, Eddie, that's as it should be! You try and understand that. Rights, not privileges. It's that easy. It really bloody is.

-----

The point is that you're right anon. Shit things do happen. People get lied to, used, abused, abandoned. And yes, we should all be prepared, know the signs, take precautions, don't go off with strangers.

And there are people who won't give a shit about your boundaries.

But they are the people in the wrong. They're the people who we should be trying to change.

Rather than saying 'okay everyone, expect abuse, sit back and take it because otherwise you're being entitled, you're being a feminisit, you're being 'insert generally oppressive shaming terminology here'.

So I will yell all day long.

>>7762638
Cry moar, faggot.

Your beta tears are delicious.

>>7762649
That blond chick sticks out like a sore thumb

>>7762646


Cry more, faggot.

Your beta tears are delicious.

>>7762636
People aren't entitled to say whatever they want without repercussions. There are several situations where, based purely one what someone has said in a public setting, they can be arrested, they can lose their job etc.

That isn't championing socialism.

But you can't expect to walk up to someone and essentially say 'because you are wearing X I am going to do and say whatever takes my fancy'. That is entitlement.

I don't want people thrown in jail because I feel they were rude to me. I want people to understand that no is no and walk away. It's after a rejection has been established that is the problem.

I'm not trying to say people should take offence because someone they find displeasing has spoken to them.

But nor do I expect someone to walk up to me and start putting their hands on me if I have skin out. Which they have done. Which makes me very uncomfortable. And that isn't and should not be okay.

>>7762662
You obviously aren't a man. "no means no" is woman bullshit. To a man, no means "phase one." If every man quit flirting with a girl the moment she showed disinterest very few men would ever get laid.

>>7762662


No, it's not okay.

Let's do a social experiment with the self entitled betas:
1. I want all of you sloppy fucks to go find a strip club (if you're old enough to even go to one).
2. Take your pick of the many scantily clad women who will be in the vicinity.
3. proceed to verbally harass her and if time permits, cop a feel!
4. Let's see what happens when the bouncers get involved! (make sure one of your dumb beta friends has their smartphone ready!)

Result: Extreme entertainment. Please upload to youtube.