[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/cgl/ - Cosplay & EGL


View post   

File: 191 KB, 493x750, tumblr_n8i8he2nmB1rby7fyo1_500.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7672275 No.7672275[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

>> No.7672312
File: 99 KB, 640x640, tumblr_n7upn1SNoI1qehmswo1_1280.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7672312

>> No.7672316
File: 604 KB, 468x750, tumblr_n7hccgqM0P1ry834no1_500.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7672316

>>7672312

>> No.7672333

The worst part is when someone actually puts EFFORD into something that ends up looking awful. Like that one tumblr girl who handsewed rows of cheap lace onto knee high converse.

>> No.7672375

I just woke up and I already cringe so hard with 3 pics only.
>first is an obvious edgyfag with shit DARK XD makeup
>second has a cute face but fucking flower crown and shit dress
>last one may actually be a "good idea" (the sunflowers matching the JSK for a cute summery theme) but she fucked up bad

>> No.7672384
File: 114 KB, 960x825, IMG_24710945276119.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7672384

The shoes in the right pic are fucking disgusting. Wear expensive elegant fashion with shitty worn out shoes, gross.

>> No.7672603

>>7672384
belong in the nitpick thread

>> No.7672626

>>7672384
I know its weird but I actually like worn out shoes with lolita. It adds an element of...idk.."real" street fashion and not a costume you're putting on. Its a testament to how often you wear it etc.

When everything is prim and proper I feel it ends up looking cosplayish.

Those socks are awful though, and the shoes, style wise are a bit off.

>> No.7672636

>>7672626
Shoes don't need to be "worn out" to be real fashion. All of my shoes are in good condition. If you don't take decent care of your shoes (and throw them away if the need arises), you're just a pleb with no sense of class or taste.

>> No.7672637

>>7672636
This, you're grody if you wear shoes that look like those

>> No.7672640

>>7672636
>makes a good point, then shits all over the poster with the last sentence
really?

>> No.7672683

>>7672636
You people never leave the house in this do you?

>> No.7672686

>>7672683
You drag your feet like a neanderthal or something, anon? It's really not difficult to keep nice shoes nice.

>> No.7672687

>>7672683
You can clean up your shoes after going out or throw them away if they get too worn out. I was not saying that shoes shouldn't show any wear, but the shoes in OPs pic look really bad. Scuffs can usually be buffed away, and if they can't, you need to get rid of your shoes once they are this dirty.

>> No.7672691

>>7672640
It's the fucking truth. This goes for almost all fashion (unless you're some crusty punk or grunge enthusiast) and even more so for "classy" fashions like lolita. There's no excuse for shoes looking that gross.

>> No.7672695

>>7672691
Your point could have been made without telling someone they have no class.
You went through an awkward clothing phase, too, even if it was just when you were 5. Concrit goes a lot farther than insult and people are much more likely to take your advice.

>> No.7672698

>>7672695
You're on /cgl/, get used to tough love or gtfo.

>> No.7672702
File: 670 KB, 500x281, ooh my delicate feelings.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7672702

>>7672698

>> No.7672708

>>7672695
>where do you think you are.jpg
No one cares about stepping on your toes with how they word things here, this isn't tumblr.

>> No.7672711

>>7672702
>this inappropriate reaction image.

modchan i that you?

>> No.7672714

How about stop shitting up the thread and post some goddamn eyesores

>> No.7672716

>>7672714
lrn2quote

>> No.7672717
File: 110 KB, 960x640, hamplanet.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7672717

>> No.7672731
File: 103 KB, 480x445, Leopard ita.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7672731

This is Baby...

>> No.7672746

>>7672717
There's nothing wrong with her outfit, she's just fat. For fucks sake.

>>7672731
This, however, is hideous. It looks like she's channeling unseelie_allure

>> No.7672747

>>7672312
Does the dress look square because she's tall and not wearing a petticoat or because she's that large?

>> No.7672751

>>7672746
Anon, it's probably more of a nitpick than an ita, I agree, but...

>No wig
>Glasses
>OTKs instead of tights which are unflattering on fat girls
>Black shoes with a completely light coord
>No wristwear

I don't think she's 'just fat'.

>> No.7672770

>>7672751
Not really defending that girl but
1) wigs aren't necessary (this girl still needs to style her hair)
2) her glasses are pretty unobtrusive (compared to annoying glasses anon)

Even the black shoes and lack of wristwear (though it does appear she's wearing something) are more nitpicks, for me. You should have pointed out that her hair is too small for the hat, the blouse is ill fitting, and more than just wristwear, she's under accessorized.
Take away the fat and she's more nitpick than ita for me, though, as this could be a boring but passable casual coord on someone who fit the clothing better.

>> No.7672775

>>7672770
>>7672751
>>7672717

I'd throw in bad makeup, too, but that's just me. Girl needs to do some sit-ups though.

>> No.7672776

>>7672717
>>7672746
She's not "just fat" she's as big as the humans from wall-e
She's so fat she's riding an elephant instead of a horse lmao.

Also this >>7672751
Don't give her asspats on her "meh" coord that barely looks lolita just because she's overweight.
She's painful to look at, so she's ita.

>> No.7672780

>>7672776
This. This is /cgl/, not tumblr.

>> No.7672802
File: 61 KB, 540x960, 10488334_304155779752758_2605269122215381584_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7672802

She's tagging it as lolita and "kawaiifashion". What about this outfit is remotely lolita?

>> No.7672803

>>7672316
what the hell is wrong with her legs

>> No.7672811
File: 145 KB, 222x263, mfw.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7672811

>>7672717

>dat poor elephant

>> No.7672827

>>7672802
Armin hipster au

>> No.7672844

>>7672802
Maybe she means the other kind?

>> No.7672913
File: 29 KB, 480x640, 10454343_1440176316250745_8408384600148889354_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7672913

It would probably take less time to list what's ok about this photo as apposed to what's wrong.

Her ugly, lumpy manface, huge nose, fugly piercings, and cheap home-done looking tat piss me off. Also dat shitty dyejob.

Dis is not rori.

>> No.7672916

>>7672913
I thought that was a girl I knew from high school.
She recently expressed interest in getting into lolita too, but she really doesn't have the face for it. And that looks like something she'd buy.

>> No.7672919

>>7672916
What's sadder is that bitch brags all the time about how long she has lived in grorious nippon but she is still a ita. And in her 30s. Nastay.

>> No.7673116

>>7672717
>i can show you the food court
>shining, shimmering, splendid,
>come on seagulls, when did you last let your ED not decide?
>A WHOLE NEW WORLD

>> No.7673228

>>7672384
This isn't ita. Nitpick at best, she looks p. cute in the first pic, and the only real issue is her ratty shoes in the second. And her hair looks a little jank, but I don't do my hair to do basic coord pics in my room usually either.

>> No.7673240

>>7672751
>glasses

Can we all just fuck off about glasses

Unless someone is wearing like huge hipster frames or those ugly huge round harry potter glasses, and they're not cosmetic, glasses do not make ita. People need them to see. We need to choose frames based on our everyday lives, and lolita isn't everyday for everybody.

Not saying she looks good, she looks fucking terrible, but fuck off about glasses already.

>> No.7673255

>>7673240
You can buy real glasses at zenni optical for $30 that will go with your coords. No excuses.

>> No.7673262

>>7673255

I can't. They can't make my prescription. I'm limited to a few frame options wherever I go.

>> No.7673264

>>7672717
>humpty dumpty

>> No.7673328

>>7673262
bad eyes loli club. My prescription requires me to get mine shrunk there too!

>> No.7673345
File: 167 KB, 356x359, 1373727408829.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7673345

>>7673262

>> No.7673537

>>7672717
If she wasn't such a landwhale her outfit wouldn't look so bad

>> No.7673597

>>7672751
>glasses
Come on, glasses are necessary for some people and not everyone can wear contacts. Hers are low-key frames anyway.

>>7673255
>decent glasses for $30
lmao. If you have an even slightly non-standard prescription, There's no way you can buy glasses online.

>> No.7673598

>>7672384
Ecept for the shoes and socks on the right, there's nothing wrong with it. Take that shit to the nitpick thread.

>> No.7673601

>>7673597
Seconding about glasses. I recently got a free pair from a fishy Chinese company - they look nice and I can see fine, but only so long as I look out of the center of the glass. They have a fish eye feel, I'm still getting used to it because a lot of straight surfaces keep curving. I could get more from them as they are super cheap but I'd rather just wear contacts. Cheap glasses are a pain in the ass

>> No.7673790
File: 149 KB, 500x667, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7673790

I count about six shades of brown. Also she tagged it as 'kuro lolita'.

>> No.7673804

>>7672316
That's the ugliest dress I've ever seen

>> No.7673813

>>7673790
This seems more nitpick,

but stuff like this always makes me want to stay with all black coords, just so it matches

>> No.7673851

>>7673790
Not kuro
Browns don't match
Dat belt
3strikes = ita.

Nitpicks: makeup subpar,
yellow/cream flowers in crown poor attempt to tie in the yellow belt gems and gold on parasol?
Wrinkled ruffles errwhar
Scuffed shoes
Funky bolero bow not tied nicely

In b4 'let's see your coord'
I don't tag things like this Lolita. If I did, I'd expect same reaction.

>> No.7673858

>>7673262
This as well. Also when you switch frames, they sit on your face differently, and if your eyes are bad, it'll give you headaches out the ass until your eyes readjust to the new pair.

So, want to wear that coord? Fuck your head, fuck doing anything productive for three to four days beforehand, you have to switch glasses!

>> No.7673906

>>7673851
>3strikes=ita
no, pretty sure being painful to look at makes it ita

Mismatching, otherwise nice accessories, is nitpick

>> No.7674009

>>7672913
>>7672919
post better pics or gtfo

>> No.7674017

>>7674009
How is this not a good pick? You can see her fug manface clearly.

>> No.7674019

>>7672802
The fuck is wrong with her lips.

>> No.7674023

>>7673597
Actually I have to debate this. I have 3 pairs from zenni, my prescription is in the -8 category so I had to get them shrunken. I actually took them to am optometry department at a mall and had them doublecheck the prescription too, and they were all fine. The only issue I had with my frames is that the design is flaking a little on the side, but I bought a $200+ pair of Candies frames that had a design fall off within 2 months as opposed to 10.

Depends on where you get it from but Zenni is pretty legit.

>> No.7674026
File: 82 KB, 500x667, sad.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7674026

These threads have been so disappointing and full of vendetta

all you have to do is go on tumblr and search the tags

"Gothic lolita"

>> No.7674030
File: 60 KB, 500x667, uhm.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7674030

i'm not sure how i feel about this

>> No.7674043

>>7674030
> over the age of 12
> drinking Bacardi Breezer
Oh dear.

>> No.7674072
File: 126 KB, 616x960, IMG_24919296930173.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7674072

>> No.7674074

>>7674030
From the thumbnail I thought she had a bottle full of some sort of long stringy stuff and was pouring it on herself.

>> No.7674100

>>7674017
i think anon just wanted a better picture of the girl, how the fuck are we supposed to laugh at her coord if her face is the only thing in the pic?

all i can see right now is an average looking girl with a flashy hair color, and i could care less

>> No.7674123
File: 20 KB, 444x547, itadress.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7674123

>>7674100

>> No.7674135

>>7674123
then... it's just something she sleeps in?
i didn't know you could have a sleepwear faux pas, seems a tad extreme

>> No.7674257

>>7674030
So much second-hand embarrassment from this photo.

>> No.7674356
File: 78 KB, 720x960, 10525723_838460599498771_6010810321447185949_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7674356

>> No.7674391

>>7672913
Eh, her face isn't really thaaat bad. She could probably be at least decent with some flattering makeup.

>> No.7674416

>>7672913
She isn't really ugly...just average looking. Most lolitas aren't pretty or beautiful, just average.

>> No.7674420
File: 77 KB, 368x368, 1400212046998.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7674420

>>7674356

I'm sorry it's not even this chick, just about 90% of the coords done with "inspiration" from Doctor Who, AoT/SnK, etc. never looks good or just meh at best. I recently saw a Captain America coord and even I love CA to death I was just cringing the whole time looking at the picture.

I have seen a few decent ones though so I'll give credit where it's due and say not all of those show/movie-inspired coords suck.

>> No.7674454

>>7674356
i love that the CoF itas are already kissing her ass. looks like sasha hit the potatoes a few too many times.

>> No.7674592

>>7672913
I doubt this was tagged as lolita. Pretty sure I saw this posted just to show off her hair color and from what I understand she left lolita.

>> No.7674613

>>7674100
>could care less

Stop that.

>> No.7674647

>>7674613
i actually did a quick internet search to check if it was the correct expression before writing this, because even if i was pretty sure i had seen it several times, it seemed like a stupid thing to say.

not my fault you folk fucked your own language beyond repair.

>> No.7674712

>>7674647
The expression is "couldn't care less," you twat. As in, you don't care at all, so it's impossible for you to care less.

>> No.7674719

>>7674712
i understand, i just said "could care less" is also used a lot, even if it's wrong

>> No.7674813

>>7674719
Just because things are done frequently doesn't mean that doing them makes you any less of a twat. You're probably an ita; god knows plenty of people don't know how to dress themselves.

pic related >>7674356
>fandom lolita, very poorly executed at that
>excuses for what looks like fabric turd around waist
>bad/big hair accessory, barely styled
>5 browns, most of which work that well together
>cheap, generic, ill-fitting jacket
>bodice is visibly gaping

This girl might fit into her clothing a bit better if she put down the potatoes.

>> No.7674874

>>7674813
dude, will you stop? if i'd known it wasn't the correct expression, i would'nt have used it.

>> No.7674885

>>7674023
I just pick out neutral frames that I like that seem to go with most my stuff... Online glasses shipping can't happen for me.
I have astigmatism, am both far sighted and near sighted and I need prism in my glasses. My prescription is also different levels, -4 and +3.5. Zenni is no help for me.

I just take my glasses off when it comes to pictures

>> No.7674899

>>7674874
i could give two shits

>> No.7674923
File: 1.91 MB, 1280x1274, tumblr_n85j0ugcU61qbilw3o2_1280.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7674923

WHY

>> No.7674973

>>7672626
I could see your point if they were worn-in leather boots or something, but those are busted-ass grungy $5 ballet flats.

>> No.7674994

>>7674023
I have an astigmatism and different prescriptions on each eye. Which is why I said, unless you have a standard prescription (both eyes the same/similar, no special requirements), it's not really a good idea.

>> No.7675004

>>7674647
>>7674874
I'm not a native speaker, and I still know how to say it correctly. Don't be a twat, you fucked up by not researching properly.

>>7674923
The underskirt clashes so badly. I wouldn't even hate it otherwise.

>> No.7675023

>>7674923
I call nitpick
>she's wearing tights not knee socks
>wearing underskirt so dress isn't too short
>colors are trying to match together
what's so wrong with it?

>> No.7675029

>>7674923
Nitpicking for sure. The underskirt seems to be completely unrelated to anything else going on and the shoes are terribly simple compared to such a dress. The cuffs also don't seem to match, but I can't say it really hurts, even if she appears not to be wearing any make up.

>> No.7675078

>>7675023

Not the one who posted her but the underskirt doesn't match the dress at all, just the way she tried to coordinate everything is really off. That aside though, she's just way too big. Even putting aside her weight, she's tall as fuck. I think its usually fine if there is only one or two things about you that don't fit the lolita aesthetic but this girl is just a laundry list of dont's for this fashion.

It could've been much worse, yeah, but that doesn't mean this is good.

>> No.7675123

>>7673851
how can you see the scuffs on her shoes? I can't find anything

>> No.7675124

>>7675023
She's clearly wearing a sailorjsk under a completely different themed jsk.. it looks weird to me too

>> No.7675126

>>7674026
How do you fuck shoe straps up this badly

>> No.7675315

>>7674923
Ugh it's so annoying because she had one really lovely coord and then ever since her outfits have been terrible

>> No.7676373

>>7674923
I still don't get why tall girls do this shit. I'm tall. I'm six fucking foot without shoes. But I can find "tea length" dresses that at least go near my knees, and a few really simple cotton underskirts. Its not like they're hard to find or make in basic colors, mine all came from regular stores.

>> No.7677290

>>7673255
you obviously know jack shit about glasses

>> No.7677301
File: 658 KB, 423x632, Capture.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7677301

>> No.7677311

>>7675023
Since when is wearing tights a bad thing?

>> No.7677322

>>7673240
Even though they are for function, if glasses are very incongruous in a coord, they will get comment. Most people think if you don't get a pair that don't clash with your Lolita, it looks bad. I'd say get a pair that matches well with your Lolita and then when you wear them with normal clothes it will look fine too but then I wear Lolita as much as my normal clothes and I usually have several pairs because though I have to wear glasses or contacts to see/drive, I consider my glasses FRAMES as fashion accessories. I don't get headaches switching.

>> No.7677326

>>7673906
That's usually how I judge if something is just a nitpick or ita. 3 or more major things wrong. I should have said '3 strikes = it's TO ME'
Better?

>> No.7677335

>>7674123
Was it tagged Lolita? I it was then I could see how people would think it was an ita dress. I wear nightgowns and lingerie that are pretty and frilly style equals to my Lolita dresses but I don't tag either Lolita.

>> No.7677346

>>7677335
Two people on here called it an ita dress based on the original pic that shows the top elastic and straps only.

The original pic wasn't tagged lolita and made no mention of lolita in the description because the person in question isn't a lolita. She was talking about her hair.

>> No.7677371

>>7672827
my sides

>> No.7677464

>>7677346
That's weird that it would get picked on repeatedly if it wasn't tagged Lolita. Otoh, it's summer and people are bored and this is cgl so...

I don't think things should get judged if they aren't tagged Lolita, lots of girls wear their actual Lolita pieces in non-Lolita ways and I like it. They shouldn't get them picked on if they are keeping it out of the tag. That's actually the correct way to do it.

>> No.7677465

>>7675023
>she's wearing tights not knee socks
How is that even a problem?

>> No.7677472

>>7677464
It's Rosaire.

>> No.7677479

>>7677322
Okay cool, but you need to realize that glasses are potentially really expensive, and not everyone can afford/bother having several frames. My prescription is all kinds of weird and I usually have to shell out about $140 just for the lenses, not to mention decent frames. Also, your prescription can change, and that's going to be fun.

>> No.7677480

>>7677472
So what? That shit needs to stop already.

>> No.7677485

>>7675078
This.
This tall, this fat, anything the least bit wrong is going to be magnified 10x. Maybe it's not fair but it's true. Most people look at even her better coords and go "wow, WTF!".

You can wear anything you want but the Lolita fashion hobby isn't a kind or accepting one...when you are this far out of the ideal aesthetic for the fashion. Most people are going to think it just doesn't look good.

>> No.7677494

>>7677472
Aha, so that's why. I wondered. She's gotten enough of an enemy base in the fashion that it's going to happen no matter what she does, I think. Does she have an encyclopedia dramatica page yet?

>> No.7677538

>>7677479
I do realize it, I buy nice designer frames that are rarely under a couple hundred a pop and get anti glare, special options, etc. But if you are spending hundreds on dresses and accessories and your glasses always throw off your Lolita look, maybe consider buying 1-2 fewer dresses per year and getting pretty glasses? Of course it's personal choice but people aren't just going to overlook glasses that don't go with a coordinate either.

>> No.7677648

>>7677538
If you have neutral frames (which you should anyway), I really don't see the point. It's just a waste of money to me. It's not like everyone has the Kate Davis kind of huge nerd glasses.
Can you show your glasses?

>> No.7677670
File: 299 KB, 688x1162, WaLolita8215873459346034.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7677670

Tagged as lolita
Walolita
My sides

>> No.7677701
File: 1.36 MB, 800x1280, 564n8n5huvVBb1rvjkb7o4_1280.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7677701

>"Hello, 911? Yes, I’d like to report that I look hella cute. So cute, that it’s illegal. Arrest me now."

Tagged as lolita

>> No.7677720

>>7677701
>Vomit.jpg

>> No.7677721

>>7677701
Damn, I'm all for self-confidence and all, but there is no fashion in which this outfit looks good.
>captcha: and gnetards

>> No.7677755

>>7677701
Obviously referencing the other kind of Lolita though yes, badly done even for that.

>> No.7678531
File: 79 KB, 720x960, IMG_74214874568962.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7678531

>> No.7678551

>>7678531
Already been posted, babz
>>7674356

>> No.7678581
File: 21 KB, 264x191, awholenuworld.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7678581

>>7672717
I wonder if this is deliberate or not?

>> No.7678855
File: 505 KB, 800x1066, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7678855

If you're going to make a character inspired coord at least make the skirt the right length, seriously, would that have been so hard??

>> No.7678940

>>7678855
I-is it wrong that I actually kind of like this? It's not a fashion, it's a costume at this point, but I'd squeal over the craftmanship if I saw her at a con

>> No.7678967

>>7677701
But anon, she is trying to be a "nymphet"...

>> No.7679109

>>7678940
idk the fact that it seems well made kinda just makes this sadder to me.

>> No.7679119
File: 1.75 MB, 1072x740, bleh.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7679119

Some of these girl don't even look like they tried.

>> No.7679131

>>7679119
Those two girls in the middle must be so embarassed.

>> No.7679145

>>7679119
POSTURE goddamn.

>> No.7679163

>>7672802
slap on some circle lenses and a wig and boom you've got yourself a lolita

>> No.7679168

>>7678855
I wouldn't call it lolita, but I like it.

>> No.7679186

>>7679119
Lor said that you should keep to yourself and not say anything to itas, but I wonder what she thinks about them deep down.

>> No.7679238
File: 107 KB, 960x720, 10502227_10203462294090871_2901936555472487892_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7679238

Most of them look ok, not spectacular but not so bad. But the fat one in the middle with the dreads and the one on the left with the face mask oh dear.

>> No.7679357

>>7679238
I like that the one and the middle and the girl on the far right seem to be a very similar size, yet the one is dressed 10 times better, save the fact that her dress looks like it's going to burst.

>> No.7679366

>>7679357
*the one on the right

>> No.7679374

>>7679186
Does it matter what she thinks? Her ugly ass oxfords in her outfit do not go with the sweet theme.

>> No.7679385

>>7679119
girl 1 is cute rockin that 2007 lolita style
girl 2 fucking killed it with those god damn leggings. put something in your hair, black tea parties dont even match wtf
girl3 needs to burn those shoes and put on some cute white tights or something, then steal girl2's black tea parties. add something small and cute to her hair.
girl4 and 5 are cute. would not change, except maybe some cuter brown shoes for girl4 and different makeup for girl5
girl6...put effort into hair/makeup, lacking hair accessory, cardigan does not look good. get a cute white bolero instead. can't really see dress but it looks like it needs more poof? idk its hidden under that ugly unflattering cardi. shoes do not fit with the dress. something chunkier to balance out her top half. throw that bag away.
girl7 looks cute and casual, needs more poof, lacy ankle socks instead, better styled hair, makeup, and she could be cute too

>> No.7679388

>>7679186
I'm still not sure if it's kind or otherwise to NOT critique the itas. There's something vaguely unhelpful in just letting them stay ita. I know certain Lolitas absolutely will not offer concrit even if asked and I always wonder if it's really because they are nice or instead because they don't really want the itas to improve much.

>> No.7679403

>>7679388
Yeah, that's what I think. Making at least gentle suggestions can be really helpful, especially because a lot of itas just have no clue how to dress themselves in general.

>>7679374
You sound bitter.

>> No.7679404

>>7679385
Girl 6 and 7 are just so terrible though, not cute at all.

>> No.7679527

>>7679238
What I don't get is why they put her in the middle obscuring some of the cute girls instead of shoving her in the back.

>> No.7679579

>>7679527
Usually you dont place the people in group shots besides a general tall people go in the back idea. She likely put herself there.

>> No.7679718
File: 99 KB, 639x960, tumblr_mrb0tean9n1r806upo2_1280.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7679718

shironuri desu~

>> No.7679744

>>7673264
omfg anon, you are my soul mate! I thought the exact same thing!

>> No.7681058
File: 347 KB, 500x500, tumblr_n8oc79OVyf1qmqglbo1_500.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7681058

>"No bra kei"
>#mori girl #natural kei

I want to barf.

>> No.7681157

>>7674356
Wait a second.... I passed by her during Metro..... I remember thinking "I want her bag" then she took out an actual potato.

>> No.7681183

>>7674356
Saw this on CoF. Its hideous. This is a poorly done cosplay.

>> No.7681187

>>7679718
She wouldn't of nearly looked so bad if her makeup made more sense, that peignoir needs to be longer and that ugly white lace I don't like, the gloves would be nicer maybe gone or have a light lacey pair, also a different angle.

>> No.7681261

>>7679718
So fucking sick of itas grabbing onto the shironuri style and trying to replicate it just because its so different~ and edgy~ and then have this splotchy, uneven clown make up. I love well-done shironuri and its becoming a shitty, cheap trend.

>> No.7681316

>>7679388
I think it's probably because they don't want to be the cause of drama.
From what I've seen, a lot of itas get defensive when getting concrit, and it's probably worse if you're a well-known lolita.

>> No.7681373

>>7677701
Unless its the novel version of Lolita. Either way. Its shit.

>> No.7681486

>>7679527
it's the ita sun effect anon

>> No.7681542

>>7681261
It's going to stay shitty until someone does a tutorial on how to do good whiteface using western products. Minori's video tutorial featured Asian greasepaint and powder foundation. Not terribly expensive when compared to actual geisha and kabuki makeup but more than most hobbyist shironuri want to pay so they use cheap Halloween makeup and that's the result. And yes it looks cheap and shitty.

>> No.7681603

>>7679388
I'm for letting them stay ita. It doesn't rustle my jimmies to see itas being ita and I don't have the urge to correct or improve them. They will either get it or they won't. Cheapie chans will always loli-fy, edgy desu chans will always want to stand out, fandom chans will always want to do the mashups, fatty-chans will usually stay fat. I honestly haven't seen a whole lot of true itas get better. They stay ita or get discouraged and leave. I spend a bit of time give good comments and likes to the good Lolitas to encourage THEM and just let the bad ones be and ignore them.

>> No.7681667

>>7681542
I've seen loads of good whiteface tutorials using western products. Its just not specifically shironuri tutorials, its cosplay tutorials and such.
If a lolita does shitty shironuri, its ridiculous. She spent a ton of money on her outfit, but isnt willing to spend a bit on good makeup? I understand if you buy cheap shit for a trial run, but dont wear it out.

>> No.7682053

So this storenvy was just posted to the fairy Kei sales group.
>http://spp.storenvy.com/

the whole shop is so gross it's almost funny

>> No.7682498
File: 66 KB, 476x720, ae952cda-f83b-4bc6-988b-29c87367d.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7682498

>>7673262
I know these feels.. I just have to wear contacts in lolita.

>> No.7682958

>>7679119
The centre one looks good, but is it a girl or a guy? I can't figure it out.... So if boy, good on him.

>> No.7683002

>>7672811

LOLOL MTE

>> No.7683011

>>7681667
What are some of the good ones using decent products that give or say a list? Examples, please?

>> No.7683034

>>7681603
I actually agree with this. Newbies who want to learn usually mention wanting advice at some point, and if they're going to improve they'll usually do so within a year. The ones that don't are never going to get better anyway. Just stick them together and have smaller meets with the girls that did improve and learned to look nice.

>>7682958
The one in sweet? That's lovelylor. She's a woman but just has a very unfortunate face. The one in black is a woman too as far as I know.

>> No.7683042

>>7674923
You're taking a picture at home on a tripod. Wear some fucking heels

>> No.7683271
File: 626 KB, 500x275, sip.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7683271

>>7679527
This actually happened to me at a recent meetup.
>Everybody's assembling to take a group photo
>"All tall girls to the back!"
>Be 4'11", standing in the center
>Mfw two amazonian weebs move over, stand directly in front of me and strike a peace pose
>Mfw everybody notices and doesn't say anything
>Mfw when person taking the photo awkwardly tries to take it from an angle, so you can at least see a small sliver of my outfit

>> No.7683289

>>7672913
Gtfo, vendetta-chan. Take your vendetta elsewhere.

>> No.7683374

>>7677311
>>7677465
Girls with bigger legs should really avoid knee socks, since they cut into them, and end up looking like stuffed sausages.

>> No.7683688

>>7683374
knee socks look shit on anyone. OTKs are superior, tights are the best imo. But yeah, they're even worse on fat legs.

>> No.7683708
File: 128 KB, 640x480, madame medusa.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7683708

>>7677701
Ugh, what a mess.

Pic related is who she reminds me of. She just needs the red hair and the red dress.

>> No.7683883

>>7678855
Short handmade skirts are one of my biggest pet peeves when it comes to lolita.

>> No.7683895

>>7679374
I was thinking about those shoes too, but it looks like they're at a museum or some place where a lot of walking is involved so they're not that bad in that case. I highly doubt she would have over looked her choice of shoe at an inactive meet when the rest of her outfit looks so put together.

>> No.7683929

>>7683374
I second this, as a fat girl I have always known to steer away from knee socks. You have to have like the perfect set of legs and outfit to really pull it off. I've seen really cute girls not even pull it off right, it's a tricky set of footwear.

>> No.7684242

>>7672384
This person would look so good in ouji/kodona, holy crap.

>> No.7684250

>>7677301
This looks like a Kakashi genderbent cosplay not lolita.

>> No.7684253

>>7677670
Top folded right-over-left. Girl knew she was dead from the start.

>> No.7685206

>>7682053
Oh god this shit-pit. Self proclaimed princess does the shittiest work. And what is with those uggo circles on all the shirts and stuff?Only a full retard would ever buy from there.

>> No.7685213
File: 131 KB, 960x720, 10483989_10202162820494974_8462695346557810744_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7685213

>> No.7685214

>>7683895
I think some girls who dress really often in Lolita don't think it's a huge deal if every coord isn't picture perfect so it's kind of funny to see them so closely critiqued online. She probably shrugged and said 'whatevs' and wore something else cute the next day.

>> No.7685225

>>7679186
I think it's rude to say ANYthing if not asked. But I also think itas can just stay ita until or unless they learn better. It doesn't bug me if someone else is ita, I'm more focused on what I want to look like and my own improvement. I think many who are hyper-focused on who is ita maybe would do better to just spend the attention on themselves and their own closet and styling. Of course I suspect fully 1/2 or more of the chicks who post in these critique threads are jelly wanna bees who don't even Lolita.

>> No.7685275

>>7673116
thats awful, fuck off

>> No.7685629

>>7678855
She looks like Buzz Lightyear

>> No.7686158
File: 35 KB, 323x643, fairykey.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7686158

fairy kei, apparently.

>> No.7686177

>>7685213
the middle one must be a joke, right?

>> No.7686326

>>7678940
This would fit on the street more than most lolita.

>> No.7686342

>>7686158
This would probably look cute as fuck if she wasn't overweight.

>> No.7686348

>>7686342
No it wouldn't, it'd still be thrown-together and mismatching and her hair would still be shit.

>> No.7686349

>>7679238
Am I evil or did anyone else imagine how great it would be to push the one on the far left off the pier?

>> No.7686371

>>7673116
That's amazing. Stay.

>> No.7686711

>>7681603
I know I'm not the majority, but I wish that people were more honest. I want to look my best, so I want more concrit. Same for other areas in life, like art. I know I have a LOT to improve on, but when I ask for help, people don't give concrit.
I guess I'd just rather work towards perfection than stay a borderline ita like I am now and try to convince myself that I look good.

>> No.7687214

>>7673858
Really? Im not the same anon you were responding to but i have never had this problem.

>> No.7687339

>>7686711
Most people won't say anything to your face.

Post pictures of your coords (cover your face) and see what people say. People here are brutally honest, but honestly it can be in a helpful way.

>> No.7687354

>>7687214
Honestly, I'm just curious as to what kind of glasses that anon considered to be rori enough

>> No.7687365

>>7686711
Self-post in the nitpick thread, you'll get plenty. Or post on CoF and see if you get reposted here. If you are asking for concrit but not getting it, there's got to be a reason though.

>> No.7687531

>>7674030
I'm more worried about the fact that her hair/wig appears to be made out of ramen.

>> No.7687689

>>7672626
Anon, staph. Those shoes are busted and you know it. LOL.

>> No.7687708

>>7672811
Right! LOL."My Father, the burden is too GREAT!"

>> No.7687715

>>7672731
This is a hot mess. What is this? Escaped mental patient lolita?

>> No.7687723

>>7673813
Black is pretty hard to fuck up. :)

>> No.7687731

>>7675126
You're bitching about the shoes straps? LOL. Have you seen the rest of the coord? It's a wrinkly tragedy covered in cheap all lace.

>> No.7687737

>>7677670
I want to see a better picture of those shoes...

>> No.7687742

>>7674030
No blouse=ita. Not to mention, those things are her wrists are disgusting.

>> No.7687750
File: 6 KB, 152x225, illumanati.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7687750

>>7672275
>Illuminati eye tattoo

She looks like a 40 year old scene kid

>> No.7687767

>>7677670
CLUSTERFUCK!
Holy hell. The captcha says:tentacle. DONE

>> No.7687769

>>7672751
>Wigs are completely unnecessary
>Glasses are fine, too

But she does look like a nasty ass landwhale and shouldn't be wearing lolita

>> No.7687774

>>7677720
That's just sad. What the hell was she trying to achieve?

>> No.7687782

>>7685629
Dem sideburns tho...I know I know, but still. Lovely quality. Just not lolita.

>> No.7687808

>>7681058
Call the domestic abuse line! He hit her again.

>> No.7687819

>>7687365
what does CoF stand for..?

>> No.7687832

>>7685213
The girls on the right look nice.

>> No.7687885

>>7686711
From what I've seen, a lot of people who claim they want honesty end up making excuses when given concrit.

>I didn't have shoes that matched.
>The blouse was a first purchase and had nothing else.
>I couldn't find any decent wigs online.

Some people can be real dicks and try to pass it off as "brutal honesty", but it's also true that the people on the receiving end of the concrit should be more open about the suggestions they get.

>> No.7687890

>>7686342
Gurl stripes and dots never match.

>> No.7687961

http://en.rocketnews24.com/2014/06/29/the-true-identity-of-these-sweet-lolita-twins-might-blow-your-mind%E3%80%90photos%E3%80%91/

Can this be ita just by knowing his identity as a 30-something year old man? I know Mana is like 50 years old but that doesn't strike me as gross as this.

>> No.7687966

>>7687961
I actually like his/her outfits.

He looks better than most white chick lolitas. And he's got a skinny, flat chested man bod, making him uber loli.

So no, this isn't ita

>> No.7687967

>>7687531
I'm fairly sure that's her hair. Her scalp is visible.

>> No.7687970

>>7687966
urgh it just feels off somehow and I don't know why. Maybe it's just the little elementary school girl outfit at the bottom which does it, I don't know.

>> No.7687974

>>7687819
Closet of frills on Facebook. Full of itas a handful of average girls and the occasional good coord

>> No.7687986

>>7687970
I know what you mean. I'll clarify to say that it most definitely is CREEPY AS FUCK, but his lolita outfits are actually very cute, and he does his makeup and styles his wig pretty damn good.

His backpack fetish is so fucking weird. I'm wondering if he's gay and and gets off at the idea that guys seeing him might find it cute, or if he's a straight weirdo dressing up as his dream fuck

>> No.7688001

Does Mana even still model nowadays or is he just exclusively designing now?

>> No.7688012
File: 79 KB, 720x960, 10550918_720731327987638_360200954005593605_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7688012

let's get more itas in here, please

>> No.7688094

>>7687961
He looks good. The randoseru really puts me off though, that makes it seem even more like a weird fetish thing.

>> No.7688097

>>7685213
I hate it when girls wear obvious wigs with what's supposed to be "old school", especially in BxW. It can be hard enough to pull off as it is but if you wear a pink cosplay wig with old school I don't care if your clothes are legit 2003 Metamorphose Temps de Fille, you look ita as fuck.

>> No.7688111

>>7686342
This particular demisexual lesbian likes to believe 100% of the reason anyone here doesn't fawn over her is OMG FATSHAMING so this post isn't really helping. She'd still look like shit if she were a skinny Japanese girl.

>> No.7688120

>>7686158
Did she intentionally separate that gross tuft of hair in the middle of her forehead from the rest of her hair?
It legit looks like a limp dick.

>> No.7688231

>>7688097
is that seriously meta?

>> No.7688232

>>7688012
Is that a flower halo? Are they evolving?

>> No.7688245

>>7688232
soon, THEY SHALL RISE.

>> No.7688254

>>7688231
No idea, I was just using that as an example. It looks kind of crappy so it could be from anywhere but I know an ita who scores cheap brand from years ago and then uses the old school defense to dress like a greasy weeb.

>> No.7688273

>>7685213
two girls on the right look good, others need more help though. the one on the left just needs to burn it and start all over again.

>> No.7688277

>>7688245
And they can keep right on rising straight into outer space.

>> No.7688283

>>7685213
Ladies and Gentleman I give you Brisbane.
Avert thine eyes.

>> No.7688305

>>7688283
which one is the infamous heathy?

We in the Sydney comm need to know who to avoid

>> No.7688308
File: 266 KB, 800x1200, l224-2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7688308

>>7688231
its fucking bodyline you twat, anyone with any sense of style can see when something is or isnt brand !

>> No.7688309

>>7674923
>it's not so bad anon it's not so--
>dat underskirt
>furfagdetected.png

>> No.7688311

>>7688283
are they the ones that ita complained about in that video ?

>> No.7688318

>>7688311
Link to video please

>> No.7688320

>>7688305
Not there. She is a heck of a lot better dressed than the few ita's in that pic though I'll give her that.

>> No.7688335
File: 49 KB, 500x292, ramsayl.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7688335

>>7688308
>its fucking bodyline you twat

>> No.7688343
File: 56 KB, 340x440, meta_blouse_gobelinprint_color.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7688343

>>7688308
To be fair, 10+ year old ~glorious burando~ can be pretty gross. Anon thought I was saying the girl in the picture was wearing 2003 Meta, and considering the things they were producing around that time...

>> No.7688357

>>7688311
>>7688318
It was taken down.

>My guess is because she was called out on all the details she forgot to mention whilst trying to garner sympathy from strangers on the internet.

Heaven forbid someone with a learning disability is asked to use spell check so that their posts are legible. >BULLYING<

Heaven forbid anyone from her own cosloli group maybe posted her photos to cgl. Must be the local lolita community. >BULLYING<

Heaven forbid someone is politely asked to slow down the rate of their posts to the FB feed and also to stop promoting their own group within another. >BULLYING<

Heaven forbid she who was posted to cgl cops flak because of being ita on a world wide forum. Must be the local lolita community. >BULLYING<

Heaven forbid mods don't side with her about certain issues. She is in the right guyz. >BULLYING<

STRAIGHT TO YOUTUBE >JUSTICE<

>> No.7688359

>>7688357
Who is she by the way

>> No.7688360

>>7688359
No idea. I only know her as the founder of cosloli. I can't remember her name. Not to sure if she deleted her entire youtube channel all together, sorry can't link you.

>> No.7688364
File: 869 KB, 400x222, 1404712105534.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7688364

>>7688357
So much facepalm when she started going on about how the Bris comm was supposedly founded by Mana. Idk how anyone can be that dense!

>> No.7688407

>>7688357

She must have deleted it pretty recently. I saw that video like a week ago. Weird.

>> No.7688426

>>7688283
>>7688305
>>7688311


This is not the Brisbane comm, this is a terrible, fungus like double head created by the one in pink for other itas. I have no idea where that "brolita" has come from, but he does not show up to the regular comm's meetups.

>> No.7688430

>>7688360
Hey name was 'crystal chan'. I actually downloaded a bunch of her lolsworthy videos, including that 'bullying' one when i read her FB saying she was about to delete her account..lol

>> No.7688434

>>7688430

Re-upload? I need the laughs. Why'd she bawleet everything anyways?

>> No.7688441

>>7688308
Sorry anon, not all of us brandwhores keep up with all of Bodylines many, MANY releases and have such a keen memory of their older pieces

>> No.7688442

>>7688434
Because someone awesome posted on my video talking about how fucking pathetic she was. She read the comment and it hurt her so badly that she deleted everything..lol

I'll re upload it though and post when it's done.

>> No.7688448

>>7688320
bullshit, some girls met her at Sydney and she was a mess at the tea party, I felt sorry for other girls she came with

>> No.7688462

>>7688448
SHE WENT TO THE TEA PARTY ?? INFRONT OF THE ONE TRUE LOLITA MISAKO SAMA ???

>> No.7688468

>>7688012
What is this JSK? Styled correctly, I'd like it...

>> No.7688472

>>7688364
What is this gif from originally?

>> No.7688473

>>7688442
Link to your video? Or screen cap of comment?

>> No.7688475

>>7688442

That makes me laugh a little, god she was such a special snowflake. But thanks, anon!

>> No.7688501

>>7688473
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oi79HJkgirw

>> No.7688503
File: 111 KB, 960x640, 1474421_492394450874696_2093068869_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7688503

>>7688462

>> No.7688512

>>7688501
love u

>> No.7688519

>>7688501
I love you so SO much right now!!

>> No.7688534
File: 394 KB, 2048x1272, 902949_492394724208002_995919988_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7688534

>>7688503
That's not from the tea party, this is

anyway, heather is a fine loli, she's just shit at the internet

>> No.7688547

>>7688501
This is honestly my favorite video of all time, you're my hero, anon.

>> No.7688573

>>7687961
Nope, still kawaii.

>> No.7688592

>>7688501
I LAUGHED FOR FUCKIN HARD
THE COMMENTS ARE EVEN BETTER

>> No.7688595

>>7688592
laughed so hard I forgot how to words

>> No.7688598
File: 115 KB, 720x960, 996089_10202206813667139_858529213_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7688598

I am just going to leave this here.

>> No.7688614

>>7688434
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UtfXBC5kTak

Re posted, enjoy. Also, thanks allot to everyone who liked my video XD; I'm glad the majority didn't take me seriously..lol

>> No.7688633

>>7688614
I love how she's like ooooh i lurked for like a year and couldn't find a lolita group.

>Quick google search on Brisbane lolitas.
>3rd result is Oz Lolita on lj
>Takes you straight to a post with a link to the fb group.
> Gurrrrl please....you stupid.

>> No.7688643

>>7686342
I don't think so.

>>7688357
Oh my god, Crystal-chan is gone?
I'm sad. She was such a train wreck.

>>7688501
pls be my waifu

>> No.7688652

>>7688614
Why does she try and show us printed out pictures when it would just be easier to edit the picture in?
I can't even see the details of the picture.

>> No.7688675

>>7688614
>beep
>beeping

>> No.7688676

>>7688012
>>7688468
Yeah, the JSK is kinda cute. but I mean

>Flower "halo" bs
>wierd animal ears
>No petti
>Ugly blouse
>Heinous shoes
>Ugly socks
>Random teddy bear head purse with goth styled coord...?

Sigh. Lolitas in and around Tampa really suck for the most part.

>> No.7688681
File: 4 KB, 300x163, awwyeah.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7688681

>>7688501
My favorite lolita video and legit the only lolita humor that's actually made me laugh

Most lolita's attempts at being "funny" are so bad they're embarrassing, but this actually had me lol'ing

Gotta ask though, did you buy that dress just for the sake of the video? Not judging or anything, just truly curious

>> No.7688683

>>7688614

>people will do crazy things to get into your panties

>> No.7688725

>>7688681
merfff I knew this question was going to be asked sooner or later.. embarrassingly, that monstrosity was bought when during my weeb lolita days. I thought replica's were the shit and I was going to look soo kawaii sugoi..lol

Trust me when I say I am not that same n00b, I hate replica's with a passion now. In fact I hate them so much I refuse to sell that one I have now because I don't want to be apart of the crapfest..

>> No.7688740

>>7688614

Original asker here; thank-you so much Neko-anon! I hadn't seen your first video before you linked it and it made me laugh. The comments you got from Kota Bear and CC made me laugh, too, just the whole faux-authoritative bullshit they tried to pull.

>> No.7688747

>>7688676
tfw... I'm moving to Tampa in about a month. Are they really all that bad?

>> No.7688748

>>7688676
>>7688747
Really? I mean, there are some that could use guidance but I've seen photos from the meets and they look ok to me.

>> No.7688758

>>7688747
they look really well put together for the most part.

>> No.7688768

>>7688501
I love the gasp when you open the package.
It reminds me of those girls who do replica unboxings and get overly excited over how "HIGH QUALITEA" it is.

>> No.7688789

>>7688748
>>7688758
Oh thank god... Not the reason for the move (obviously), but I was hoping I could go to more meetups and not be surrounded by itas when I got there. Your replied give me hope.

>> No.7688793

>>7688789
**replies not replied, sorry.

>> No.7688980

>>7688789
I went to the metrocon lolita meet, kinda awkward with it mostly being a swap sort of thing. Everyone was pleasant, but you could tell they felt awkward with mentioning Bodyline with him there.

>> No.7689028

>>7688747
Yes.

>>7688748 and >>7688758 are lying to you. There's like 1 or 2 girls who are cute and well put together, the rest are mainly chubby chans are just greasy weebs.

Not that it really matters, but most of them also pretty much wear 100% Bodyline/offbrand. Sometimes that's fine, but... they just don't put it together well.

Combined with the Florida heat and humidity you get one melty hot mess of a comm.

Also, I think I came up with a new print name
>Melty Hot Mess

>> No.7689338
File: 70 KB, 620x932, 10441075_10152186295377341_6216855084499856630_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7689338

>> No.7689347

>>7689338
is that fucking bodyline

>> No.7689349

>>7689347
Nope, Meta

>> No.7689366

>>7689349
Holy shit that's the worst thing I've ever seen come out of Meta. I'm actually kind of disappointed since Meta has served me pretty well.

>> No.7689374

>>7689366
Really? I think it's pretty cute for old-school.

>> No.7689376

>>7689366
I have a feeling it could be made into a decent old school coord if it wasn't being worn by a landwhale.

>> No.7689394

>>7688614

>behind the buuuurs
everytime she seriously makes an "ur" sound when there's supposed to be an "o" sound

>> No.7689402

>>7689376
I actually don't have a problem with plus-sized girls wearing lolita (since I'm plus-sized myself), but she definitely needs something to wear under that top. No one wants to see flabby arms and clammy chest-flesh. And the socks have to go. Tights are best on bigger girls I think. Is she even wearing a petticoat??

>> No.7689406

>>7689402
I think people in the comments told her to wear a blouse, she told them she didn't want to, and was promptly backed up by a bunch of itas going "I think it looks great without a blouse! ^_^". Fucking Facebook.

>> No.7689440

>>7689406
I hope she didn't go outside like that, at least.

>> No.7689453

>>7688614
Jesus Christ. I feel like if she and miki meet in real life they'd become instant best friends. They both dress like shit, Both victims of "bullying" both super special snowflakes.

>> No.7689467

>>7688442
So she deleted everything. Well, now we can wait for another video about how she is "bullied".

>> No.7689490

>>7689366
THAT's the worst thing you've seen Meta produce? What about the pink camo prints? The heart leopard prints? Meta is the definition of hit-or-miss where tastefulness is concerned. Sometimes they're amazing and sometimes they're amazingly terrible. If this dress is the worst you've seen of Meta then you've either not looked very hard or looove tacky things, in which case you don't get to criticize this JSK.

Girl in picture is still ita though, obviously.

>> No.7689520

>>7689453
They already did comment on each other's videos, I'm pretty sure.

>> No.7689544
File: 67 KB, 500x750, wot no.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7689544

Let's get back to photo dumping, shall we? Tagged lolita on tumblr

>> No.7689552

>>7689544
it's kind of cute except for the ratty wig, but not lolita.

>> No.7689555

>>7689544
why the fuck did she think that would be a good place for a picture? ffs get these ~edgy~ scene kids outta my loli

>> No.7689556
File: 997 KB, 1272x1920, buy new tights.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7689556

>> No.7689560

>>7689544
Is it just me or does the hat look a bit crumpled

>> No.7689565

>>7689552
agreed, I actually don't mind the outfit as a thing that exists, just the label she gave it.

>>7689555
She's 3 edgy desu 5 you ~*~

>> No.7689567

>>7689556
when it's too hot for a blouse, please just wear your normalfag clothes. Or at least don't post your pic online and say it's lolita.

Why don't itas understand that?

>> No.7689576
File: 94 KB, 427x640, just stop.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7689576

>>7689567
It gets worse when you see the close up..

>> No.7689605

>>7689576
GET IT AWAY

>> No.7689609
File: 1.48 MB, 500x210, hellll no.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7689609

>>7689544
>that nasty ugly ratted the fuck up wig

>> No.7689612

>>7689366
Okay, the coord looks awful, but that is by FAR not the worst thing meta has put out. They're pretty wild. See >>7689490

>>7689453
I think she, Mikki and Kota Bear are all friends? At least they're friendly with each other.
I do think some of the backlash on Nekopocky's video was harsh and uncalled for, but she's kind of an unpleasant person, so I'll be glad if she takes a step back.

>> No.7689618

>>7689555
The concept is overdone, but I wouldn't have minded the location if she was actually well-dressed. ~~Juxtaposition~~ and all.

>> No.7689630

>>7689567
I was actually thinking abut that just today.
If it's too hot to keep your shoulders covered, just let it be. It's too hot to wear lolita. You can even still wear the dress, and work it into a normalfag outfit if the print is not too overwhelming.There is no need to cling to the "lolita" label.

>> No.7689634

>>7689576
This is just sad.

I swear, my mom is nearly 43, and she looks way younger than a lot of lolis I've seen in their 20s and 30s. What's up with very old looking chicks being into lolita? The contrast of the style against their oldness makes em look older.

>> No.7689666

>>7689556
Worse is that belt with these tights than the jsk without blouse, even if i hate JSK blouseless, they look awful all the time.

>> No.7689675

>>7689634
Maybe they smoke or have bad genes? Some people even if young look old for genetic factors. Even if i think everyone old looking or younger looking, young or old can dress lolita, in every style not only toned down classic. It depends of how you coord a dress and which colors suit you. And that girl has done a poor job of coording that jsk.

>> No.7689728
File: 35 KB, 400x400, 1348795715291.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7689728

>>7688614
>you knowrrrr
>sooorrrrrr
>nowrrrr

>> No.7689912

>>7689544
looks like she tried to make a normal pink wig into a rhapsody one? I'm not too judgy, but she looks cute in a punk kind of way. I'd smooch her

>> No.7689988

>>7689612
>>7689453
Yeah, Mikki, Crystal, and Kota are all friends, to some extent. I guess they've bonded over being itas who don't understand how to take con crit and think everyone is a meanie. I dunno.

>> No.7690198
File: 7 KB, 472x58, stoneage.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7690198

>>7689453
>>7689612
>>7689988
Speaking of Mikki...

>> No.7690779

>>7690198
my sides

>> No.7690915

>>7672316
Oh my god I think I went to high school with her

>> No.7690921

>>7672711
File name is appropriate, though.

>> No.7690937

>>7673345

My sides

>> No.7690961

>>7679145

I'm asking because this is a problem for me, so is posture really important? I have scoliosis so it can be a bit hard sometimes and I'm wondering if people will nitpick at my outfit for it if I can't always stand straight?

>> No.7691117

>>7690198
This girl, I swear to god.

>> No.7691300

>>7690198
I'm in the same comm as you, anon, and I was just about to post this. Does she really think that anyone's going to believe this shit?

>> No.7691327
File: 25 KB, 501x370, mini.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7691327

>>7691300
She's ridiculous. I haven't met her before though, have you?

Also more shit from same comm and I'm just waiting for Mikki to comment on it. She'll probably say something about how she's never bought from fanplusfriend but they do custom sizing if you're marshmallow sized.

>> No.7691354

>>7691327
I have met Mikki, she went to the Easter meetup with the other NC comm. She's... pretty much the same as she acts online, really.

I was gonna comment on that, but I decided against it. I like how she claims to already know about lolita, but somehow hasn't researched fanplusfriend?

Were you planning on going to the soda fountain meetup?

>> No.7691381

>>7691354
Huh. I sort of wish I could talk to her because I find her fascinating in an almost trainwreck sort of way but I'm afraid being nice to her would lead her to think we're friends. That's such a mean thing to say but I really don't want to be her friend, haha, especially if I get such a kick out of the stupid shit she says and would feel two-faced.

It always baffles me when people are like "I did my research!" and proceed to ask noob questions anyway. I think worse of them that way than if they just came out with the noob questions without claiming they know what they're doing.

I dunno if I'll go. I don't really like soda and it seems kind of messily put together. I don't know if I trust that comm with a swap meet.

>> No.7691406

>>7691381
No, I totally understand. I feel the same way about Mikki. But she was the one who initiated the conversation when I met her, so I didn't feel so bad.

Honestly, it seems like most of this comm is that way. Everyone seems really new to everything and inexperienced, but acts like they know things. It's kind of irritating.

I'm probably going to go, I promised a friend of mine that I would unless something came up. They have other stuff at the soda shop, I've heard that the food is really great, actually. But it's such a hot mess. The mod didn't put a cap on the number of people who could go even though there's a limit to how many can fit in the room, so now no one's sure if we'll actually fit in the private room. The mod's sweet, but also pretty naive, I think. I'm not sure about the swap meet, either, but I thought it might be a good way to rid myself of all my shitty bodyline, lol.

I don't want to spam up this thread, so my email's in the field. I'd love to keep talking to you, it's nice to know that someone else in such a hugbox comm browses /cgl/... it would be nice to have somebody to commiserate with.

>> No.7691452
File: 94 KB, 720x960, itainc.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7691452

>>7691406
I think they're all just desperate to have a say and show their "expertise" and impress the other members? It seems like a childish game of one-up.

Emailed, and here's another cap so I'm not wasting a post.

>> No.7691560

>>7691327
The way this person writes is immensely irritating to me for some reason.

>> No.7691586

>>7691452
replied. let me know if you don't receive it, though. my email has been weird lately and my internet is absolute shit.

sage for no contribution.

>> No.7691896
File: 46 KB, 552x892, no.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7691896

Fresh from CoF.

>> No.7691979

>>7691896
Why do these girls insist on dressing like this? Don't they realize how terrible they look? Do they care? All they have to do is consult the numerous online guides to lolita fashion. Learn the basics FIRST, then make your purchases. Otherwise, you look stupid and frumpy. They waste all that money and end up looking like this.

>> No.7692565
File: 45 KB, 500x333, tumblr_n8vwh5UaZs1si9sj9o3_500[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7692565

>> No.7692610

>>7686158
Kid's section at target kei

>> No.7692615

>>7689338
Babby's first lolita. she's probably super hyped to finally own a pretty lolita dress... only little does she know that soon she'll look back at this and realize it's trash.

>> No.7692661
File: 301 KB, 731x1024, true representation of america. even the size..jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7692661

>> No.7692724

>>7692661
Out of all the captain America cosplay lolita I've seen, this is the best. Obviously a costume, but it dosent look absolutely horrendous. Obviously it would look better on someone smaller and prettier, but otherwise its prett decen IMO. Then again I've seen TONS of shitty captain America loli that have made my eyes bleed so

>> No.7692998

>>7691979
She said her dress was BTSSB, she makes it look like cheap shit from F21. It's too short. It doesn't matter if a brand made it, if it barely hits mid-thigh on you, it's not lolita, unless you're doing ero or something, which she's clearly not.
The comments on her post really pissed me off. If you can't even buy black socks to go with your outfit, don't post a goddamn picture in a group with thousands of members.

>> No.7693003

>>7692615
It's meta though, so the dress itself should be decent quality, and I think this could make a cute old school coord if it was actually, you know, coordinated.

>> No.7693096
File: 124 KB, 489x720, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7693096

So this girl won a transformation COSTUME competition but says this is lolita. She transforms from "traditional japanese dress"

>> No.7693097

>>7692565
Holy shit is that a minxy or w/e wannabe? How low can you fall?

>> No.7693099
File: 86 KB, 479x720, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7693099

>>7693096
Here is the "transformation" before photo. Apparently a string is pulled on the kimono to go from traditional to modern. It's a nice idea but wow is this poorly researched/executed

>> No.7693162

>>7693099
that rat's nest of hair at the top of her wig is pretty disturbing. Why would anyone think that looks good?

>> No.7693247

>>7693162
It's like some giant cockroach is laying eggs in there

>> No.7693266

>>7693099
God, her face here. She looks like a 40-year-old cokewhore.

>> No.7693307

>>7693266
Her actual face is fine but the make up is far too dark and heavy

>> No.7693313
File: 297 KB, 768x1024, but why.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7693313

>> No.7693317
File: 298 KB, 768x1024, textbook ita.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7693317

>> No.7693320
File: 307 KB, 733x1024, mfw hat.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7693320

>> No.7693322

>>7693313
>>7693317

Loosing it over the watermark name.

>> No.7693326
File: 358 KB, 500x500, pls no..png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7693326

>> No.7693390

>>7693326
Why does it seem like the new ita trend is upside-down headbow?

>> No.7693536

>>7693313
>>7693317
>>7693320
Oh god this photographer goes to my local con and he's fucking terrible, everyone always looks so short and squat but it still appears proportionate somehow in the shot. I don't know catgirl but I saw the other two and they're nowhere near as fat as they look in his shots.

>> No.7693641
File: 134 KB, 333x500, hildekitten strikes again.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7693641

>> No.7693675

>>7693096
>>7693099
What the fuck is that thing on her head?

>> No.7693688
File: 39 KB, 143x400, dat hair.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7693688

So close. So damn close.

>> No.7693692

>>7693536
He's a photographer? With that grainy-ass shitty picture quality? Wow.
At least buy a decent camera.

>> No.7693719

>>7693688
I'd say more nitpick then ita. Light pink shoes instea of dark pink. I don't think that hair cut suits her tbh. Lastly, unnatural colored hair is hard to pull off depending on the colors in your coord. I have pastel hair and if my hair dosent match a coord I wear a wig of appropriate color. Girl here needs to do the same

>> No.7693755
File: 89 KB, 500x669, joanns called.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7693755

>> No.7693764
File: 210 KB, 500x686, y.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7693764

>> No.7693768
File: 55 KB, 500x500, looks a little bit like tammy.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7693768

>> No.7693771
File: 88 KB, 500x703, large baby.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7693771

>> No.7693790
File: 50 KB, 640x480, ooook...jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7693790

"my first cult party coord!"

>> No.7693856

>>7693790
Does she know what cult party is

>> No.7694344

>>7693326
She's all like "SWEET", but that shit is SOUR.

>> No.7694377
File: 76 KB, 500x667, that skirt needs xanax.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7694377

>> No.7694511

>>7694377
Very dark girls seriously need to get the fuck away from pastels.

>> No.7694548
File: 86 KB, 453x592, 1377059079101.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7694548

>>7694377
I can't believe she wore that to school. This is the same kid who complains about people bullying her and not understanding her. I look forward to seeing her in 10 when she realizes how much of an ass she looked like.

>> No.7694706

>>7694511
Actually I don't think she looks too bad in pink. I've seen both dark and light girls look bad in pastels, and she's not one of them you racist fuck

>> No.7694745

>>7694706
Agreed. Pastels are the least of this girls worries.