/cgl/ - Cosplay & EGL

Ey, I'm really glad I wasn't the only one to realize the friend finder thread had been deleted. I thought I was just not seeing it at first until I looked a few more times. I wish they would've kept it because it was a lot more on-topic than some of the other shit storms going on right now.

This threads gonna get deleted too, but yeah, they'll keep low quality troll posts but delete on topic threads and non-offensive off topic posts (because the discussion went off topic) in a thread. Kinda kills the board's vibe.

For a slow moving board, threads on here love to be deleted when they're legit.
Somehow Janitor never deletes the creepy foot fetish posts or self post threads by summertime newbies.

>>7552910
I've seen entire threads derailed because someone started talking about boobs. It's silly to delete a thread when it's not specifically cosplay or egl related when stuff like that happens.
Also sorry for the circular writing in the OP, I'm tired and pissed.

I have a theory that the janitor/mod here hates cgl and attained the position simply to destroy the dynamic of the board completely.

>>7552915
I agree. The board got "reformed" a while back and while that has it's ups and downs it's pretty pointless when the janitor will arbitrarily pick and choose on what they think needs to go with out really concidering the actual thread.

>>7552925
I'd hate to be that cynical, but hey, maybe that's it. The janitor seems to be letting a lot of shitposters run free right now, anyway.

I just don't understand why the janitor has such an itchy trigger finger on vaguely off-topic shit, but creepy, blatant shitposters seem to go completely unpunished even when they've been reported. Just look at the bra thread for fuck's sake. How does the janitor have time to babysit that crazy-shit-from-tumblr thread, but can't take the time to delete things that are obviously a problem and blatantly against the rules?

>>7552925
Either it's that or the janitor is really really stupid (or both).

From what I understand, one of the janitors is either miyu herself or a miyufag, and of course she hates the entire board's nature of listing all her misdeeds.

>>7552940
Dear god I hope not.

>>7552940
What?? Where'd you hear that from? It just seems strange, since no one's really mentioned Miyu in such a long time.

>>7552940

This both sounds like something pathetic that could actually happen, or something easy to say that would start the rumormill a goin. Either way, I'm a fan of this theory.

Janitor just needs to get Masa banned already. He's shitposting left and right and it's probably getting whole topics banned. No one missed him while he was gone and no one wanted him back.

I had a subject for jfashion games, like, literally, games dedicated to japanese fashion, and it got deleted, and I got banned.
its very common that if you even mention the jntr in a post you get banned if you talk about them negativly.

I'm salty

>banned for posting in a it came from tumblr thread
> topic was sjws and headcannons and all that junk
>ask how did this headcannon/headmate/multiple system thing come to be
>off topic

multiple people were banned in thread when I think the thread in general probably should have been banned since everything was off topic.

I dunno, I'm probably wrong, but still upset about it

>>7552962

I'VE UPSET THE MRA BRIGADE

/cgl/'s moderation is ridiculous. Shitposting trips everywhere and /cgl/-related threads get nuked constantly. I'm amazed the secrets thread is still up.

>>7552973

Good intentions or not, you're still shitposting, bro.

How long has this super strict modding been going on? Anyway we contact moot to tell him the /cgl/ janitor needs to take a chill pill?

>>7552910
...it's gone? What?
It was literally the same premise as the post your tumblr thread, with added information about your location and cosplay interests. Why would it be deleted? fuckthisgayearth.jpg

I was ban many times and for completelly harmless stuff.

>>7553009
Tumblr threads need to go. The janitor, although an idiot, is right about that.

>>7553009
Right?? It's so dumb that it was deleted. Cosplay and lolita are usually very social activities anyway, so what's wrong with having a community building thread? Smh.

>>7553011

I'd be inclined to agree if the janitor were so strict about everything else, but they're not.

>>7553011
Those don't usually get deleted. Why do you consider them off topic? (I'm referring to the "post your cosplay/jfash tumblrs" thread, not the it came from tumblr kind, which are indeed somewhat off topic)

Agreed. Got banned for discussing the book and the movie of lolita in a thread talking about the origins and meaning of the name of the fashion....ffs, it's in the name of the damn board, and it was a decent discussion too

>>7553026
People don't stick to just posting their cosplay tumblrs. We don't need tumblrs on cooking and other hobbies, personal blogs, or, god forbid, tumblrs full of political opinions and reblogs.

>>7553033

I think we need more affirmative action

>>7553033
So all of the threads need to go because of that?
Do taobao and aliexpress threads also need to go, since people occasionally link to craft items or home items rather than only cosplay and lolita?

Aside from that -- the point of the tumblr threads, and the friend finder thread, was to help cosplayers network and meet other cosplayers/lolitas. This is really helpful, especially if you ever want to get a group together. I just don't understand why the jan would delete that and not delete the /r9k/ shitposters.

>>7553041
>/r9k/ shitposters

I actually really doubt that many people from that board frequently come here. What are you talking about?

>>7553048

Look at the bra thread.

>>7553048
>>7553050
It's not just the bra thread. Multiple threads a day (often the feels and confessions threads) are derailed with conversations about whether women who cosplay are attention whores, whether guys being creepy at cons are only called that if they're unattractive, all the neckbeard bullshit. It never gets deleted.

>>7553053

No, I know. It's just an obvious example with a high concentration of blatantly off-topic /rk9/ers.

>>7553050
The janitor just deleted those comments, so prepare for this thread to go.

>>7553053
Thank you for saying this because it's something I definitely noticed but wasn't too sure if other people saw it, too. We've been getting a weird amount of sexist and trolling threads about cosplay being for attention whores or creepy other threads that seem super misplaced on this board given that /cgl/ is predominantly female, last time I checked. Maybe the people aren't from r9k, but they're definitely not regulars here, or aren't supposed to be.

>>7553058

Wow, it only took them, what? 2-3 days to bother with it.

>>7553050
>>7553048
>>7553056
I think those are just regular male 4channers at this point.

I am just a guy and I immediately sympathized with the idea that "only unattractive guys are called creepy" or whatever. Doesn't take /r9k/ to realize that shit's true.

>>7553061
The janitor is always deleting "creepy" or "sexist" comments while leaving other comments that go the other way intact.

You are completely and utterly wrong.

>>7553066

Are you high or just stupid?

>>7553063
The only reason they're complaining is because a lot of them are new posters who migrated to here from tumblr or other places. /cgl/ and 4chan in general have never been safe spaces for women or any other group. There have always been trolls and contrary opinions.

>>7553074

That's not really the issue. It's more that the janitor isn't enforcing rules uniformly. If they're coming down hard on vaguely off topic posts, they better be dealing with shitposters with just as little mercy.

>>7553072
The latest creepy comments in the bra thread were deleted after about an hour of being up. The thread about male fedoras is still up.

The evidence speaks for itself.

>>7553081

They got deleted because I spent a bunch of time reporting them. There've been creepy comments plaguing the thread since it started, but surprise, the janitor is a lazy shitbag except when it comes to protecting tumblrfriends from getting shittalked or something.

>>7553074
I'm not new (home board is /x/ actually, which went long years with no janitor whatsoever) and am aware shitty janitors are par for the course, doesn't mean I have to praise their shittiness.

I'm sad the friend finding topic got deleted, I was going to post there later. I want local people to go to cons with, and I want them to somewhat care about their work quality, /cgl/ seemed ideal for that. Why we can't have nice things, mod?

>>7553059
>aren't supposed to be

says who, I'm here for cosplay advice and ideas same as you

>>7553104
I mean the shitposters and you know that.

>>7553106

honestly didn't, I'm from /co/ and only started to get interested recently and it sounded like you were smearing all us new people

>>7553106
So you, basically.

>>7553063
Yeah except we aren't here to discuss some guy's Enlightened Theory of The Friendzone, we're here for cosplay and lolita. Save that stuff for r9k

>>7553122
Save the feminism for tumblr, and we would be golden.

>>7553115
Oh, no, definitely not; people from other boards who actually want to learn about cosplay/lolita are totally welcome! I really meant just trolls and shit posters, sorry I didn't make that more clear.

>>7553122
>Yeah except we aren't here to discuss some guy's Enlightened Theory of The Friendzone, we're here for cosplay and lolita
Apparently not since you're posting in this thread.

This position ("board purity") is retarded, we're here for a lot more than just to discuss costumes and the act of wearing them alone. It applies to all boards, there are a lot of interesting secondary topics that would kill all the fun if they were removed.

>>7553126
If you'd been here very long you'd know the only time /cgl/ shifts from mocking and detesting SJWs to full-on misandry mode is when provoked by neckbeards who literally think that being a convention creep is ok if you fit some minimum standard of hygiene and facial symmetry, like >>7553063. So, that too is shitposters' fault.

>>7553131
This post is confusing me deeply.
The first part is calling out Claude for saying that the shitposters shouldn't be discussing shitposter things, and would indicate that you think topics like that (whether all women are attention whores etc) belong here.

The second part seems to agree with OP and most of the other posters, who think it's stupid that the janitor is deleting friending threads and other correlated topics, /while leaving shitposters/.

Basically, you are disagreeing with yourself. What are you even trying to say.

>>7553134
>who literally think that being a convention creep is ok if you fit some minimum standard of hygiene and facial symmetry
Minimum standard? I don't think that's what I was saying. Rarely would you call a guy you're physically attracted to 'creepy'. They'd have to be mentally ill.

>>7553141
Creepiness is a behavior. Taking upskirt shots, touching boobs and asses. Cosplayers aren't going to be into that no matter what the guy looks like and if you think otherwise take your neckbeard and leave.
Addendum -- guys who are attractive are actually never going to be spotted doing so because they're not going to stoop to titgrabbing, they're going to talk to the girl like a sane person. That's why they "don't get called out". It's not because of being found personally attractive by the cosplayer.

I wonder if moot-chan really knows the extent to which this janitor has been misusing their power. Has anyone actually tried to contact him directly about it?

>>7553140
I am only pointing out the contradiction in the first part. I am not expressing my opinion there.

Friending threads are not really cosplay. "b-buh they", no, they're not cosplay. But I still think it's nice to have "friending threads" or whatever. This point has a problem is what I'm saying:
> we're here for cosplay and lolita. Save that stuff for r9k
We're here for a lot more things than just cosplay and the act of wearing it. Friends and fun are in fact allowed here, and that sometimes includes things you don't like. If we applied your principle consistently, friending threads would go straight to /soc/, which is obviously not right.

>>7553145
Apparently we have very different definitions of creepy. That's called sexual battery and it is a crime anon.

>>7553134

I think you're just way too sensitive anon, what that guy said didn't really seem that bad

>>7553149
Ahh so you actually think that the janitor should just...tone down the deleting, period. Or maybe stop being a janitor.
I have to seriously question your concept of a quality community if you think "show me your tits"-tier posts like the ones we got today are in anyway helpful or necessary.

>>7553131
>removing shitposting is removing the fun

It's only removing the annoyance. It's the same reason why we have a global rule that happy merchant maymays have to stay in /pol/

>>7553156
He said guys get called creeps only because of what they look like, that's just not true.
"way too sensitive" idgi. If I sounded like I was too mean to him it was probably because that's what people sound like on the internet. Maybe you are sensitive.

>>7553158
>>7553159
I am not commenting on any particular posts. Some posts need to be deleted. Others do not. However it is clear that the question "is it or is it not cosplay" is not sufficient to determine whether something should be deleted from /cgl/. That is all I am saying.

>>7553160

nothing to do with being mean, you're just really overreacting to something that doesn't seem to merit it, hence "way too sensitive"

>>7553161
Absolutely nobody in this thread was saying that tho?
It was evenly divided between people who wanted the mods to delete the shitposts and the slightly OT tumblr-type threads, and people who wanted the mods to delete the shitposts and leave the slightly OT threads. Then some people came in here to defend the shitposts. Since both shitposts and OT threads can involve cosplay or not involve cosplay...yeah, nobody was saying "delete all non-cosplay material, keep all slightly-cosplay-related posts"

>kooter thread
>get banned for talking about kooter in a kooter thread

I just don't understand why bans go out for relatively minor things and blatant shitposters, trolls, etc. don't ever seem to be punished. I got a short ban for replying to someone who was derailing, which fair enough, was off topic. But if that's the punishment for getting off topic, you would think than repeated shitposters would get something worse.

I don't know what to say about the "It Came From Tumblr" thread. I was one of only a few people who were posting actual content in it, while everyone else was just derailing. I'd love to have a thread to laugh at all the awful cosplays I see on tumblr, but if we can't have it without getting massively off topic, then the whole thread should probably just be deleted.

>>7553164
Confused, how am I overreacting? By...disagreeing with it?

>>7553161
Well, its a reasonable infernce to make when you said you have sympathy for those posters. But yeah, I agree that not every single post should be banned for not having an exact connection to cosplay/lolita

>>7553166
I think that one falls under the no targeted hate rule, or whatever it is. The rule that took PT dramu away.

>>7553168

by going "full-on misandry mode" as you put it

Can someone explain why that lostnatsu thread still exists, considering the fact that it's an obvious vendetta thread that was originally centered around singling out one person (something I got a 3-day ban for about a week ago, even though all I did was speak directly to Voldie), and now it's devolved into generic discussion about beauty standards and shitposts.

>>7553165
I don't think you really comprehend what I was saying, probably because my post wasn't meant for you.

>>7553182
I wasn't referring to the current situation or my own posts, i said that guys who say the same kind of things as anon would often provoke seagulls into SJW mode. That can bring on long feminism/male priviliege/whatever discussions.

>>7553194
You've been replying to me the whole time.
I get what you're saying, I just think it's unnecessary because you're preaching to the choir.

>>7553198
Okay, well, I disagree with the "pure board" premise implied in this post:
>Yeah except we aren't here to discuss some guy's Enlightened Theory of The Friendzone, we're here for cosplay and lolita. Save that stuff for r9k
We might not be here to discuss that, but that doesn't mean we're only here for cosplay and lolita. What I'm saying is I could imagine someone saying:
>Yeah except we aren't here to discuss girls meeting up in friending threads, we're here for cosplay and lolita. Save that stuff for /soc/.

It relies on a harmful premise that excludes all fun accidentally.

>>7553192
I got banned for talking to Voldie, too.

It was encouraging, and yet I got banned for going on some personal crusade or something or other.

I think the Janitor just hates anything nice.

>>7553205
Ahh ok. That very first post you replied to was not me but I agree with them.

To me the difference is that friendzoning isn't even tangential to cosplay, but the friending threads are, well, to find people to cosplay with. Like, there needs to be a line somewhere. Things tangential can stay. A cosplay feels thread is good, a general feels thread or "tell me about your dating life" thread not so much. Sorry if you find that exclusionary, but it's similar to how the other boards function.

>>7553145

So your position is attractive people are incapable of behaving poorly, only unattractive people can do that? That's a pretty fucked up view, anon.

>>7553212
I got a 3-day for saying I didn't like her bodyline cosplay. Apparently that was a "community vendetta". Criticism=vendetta now.

>>7553227
I got a ban for complaining about /cgl/ on /cgl/, quoting Hank Hill (nothing remotely offensive to anyone other than a shitposter), for talking about feels in a feels thread, etc etc

>>7553226
You misread my post (it's an understandable misreading though.) See the first part -- upskirting, boob grabbing, and other behaviors will be just as creepy if someone "attractive" does it.
Many people who are conventionally attractive have been treated "better" by society, they will be more used to talking to people as a result, and be more likely to talk to the person instead of spaghetti-ing up and grabbing their boob. Of course if they went ahead and did the creepy behavior anyway, it would still qualify as such. But you see it less because of how they have been socialized.

>>7553236
But again that's not really what we normally think of when we think "creepy". At least I don't. Creepy things are not illegal like the sexual battery you're describing, they're just creepy.

>>7553236

That's still kind of a messed up generalization though, sexual assault (which as this >>7553257 anon says is different than creepiness) can be a power thing rather than an awkwardness thing, and have nothing to do with attractiveness.

>>7553227
I got a 24 hour ban (or 48?) for replying to a post in an off topic thread about abuse some anon was going through.

Mod decided banning helpful anons was more effective than deleting an off-topic deemed thread.

Moot, you need to get into this thread and check up on things in here.

I'm serious Moot. How many more times will I have to say Moot to summon you here.

Moot moot moot moot. Moot.

>>7553291
If he's like Beetlejuice you only have to say it 3 times to summon.

>>7553285
Do you understand that the people I'm disagreeing with are the ones who claimed that this behavior would be excused by girls if the guy was attractive...?
I'm not in any way saying attractive guys wouldn't do so-and-so awful thing.

>>7553179
the thread stayed, even after my ban. anyone who talked about her in her thread was banned.
it was pretty fucked up.

>>7553293
Mooty-kins! Where are you when we need you :'(

>>7553300

But right here >>7553145 you did say that exact thing.

>guys who are attractive are actually never going to be spotted doing so

Which is what I took issue with in the first place.

>>7553291
i just got unbanned
there was an anon who wanted to donate money to some shady kitty help organisation on taobao. i very sarcastically said that it's a horrible idea and i got banned.

Everytime I post I'm scared of being banned because of the janitor with a stick up their ass. I miss the old /cgl/...

>>7553401
>I miss the old /cgl/
you mean the one where you had to sift through dozens of pt, kooter, and asherby threads to get actual content?
piss off.

A lot of the threads I liked that were about cons got deleted, which is a shame since as far as I can tell, this is the only board that discusses them with any regularity.

It was a fun excursion while it lasted, but I think I'll slink back to my home board of /tg/.

Auf wiedersehen, /cgl/.

>>7553409
>you mean the one where you had to sift through dozens of pt, kooter, and asherby threads to get actual content?
Yes, because at least those threads were lively and sometimes funny. On such a varied board, you're always going to have to sift through content you don't care about in order to find the stuff that you do. I have at least 100 threads hidden right now but you don't see me bitching about people posting things I don't like. If threads about lolita/cosplay in the media are allowed we should be able to talk about ALL relevant people in the media (i.e. Dakota), and if ita and bad makeup threads are still allowed then we should still be able to talk about PT and Asherbee without being banned. Threads created specifically to hate on those people are not okay, but we should still be able to talk about them when they're relevant without being banned.

>>>/rules/global/8

The new janitor banned me for posting the choice cuts human meats a few tutorial threads go. I was the anon that originally posted it and I pretty much stated it was a joke along with the post. I also see so many posts being deleted all the time for little to know legitimate reason.

>she's a janitor
>on the internet
>on an anime imageboard
>she does it for free
>she takes her "job" very seriously
>she does it because it is the only amount of power and control she will ever have in her pathetic life
>she shitposts in threads she doesn't like because whenever she gets upset she has an asthma attack
>she shitposts in threads she doesn't like because they interfere with the large backlog of little girl chinese cartoons she still has to watch
>she will never have a real job
>she will never move out of her parent's house
>she will never be at a healthy weight
>she will never know how to cook anything besides a hot pocket
>she will never have a boyfriend
>she will never have any friends

>>7553409
I really didn't mind the PT and Dakota threads. What bothered me was the tripfag circlejerk threads and I'm happy they're gone.

>>7552972
It's weird that those posts go but all the shitposting "u must be from tumblr lel u mad" trolling stays, and those are persistent attempts to derail a thread. So you can shitpost about it, but you can't discuss it

>>7553081
Uh, things autodelete if enough people report them. I don't think that's the janitor.

Oh man I cant wait to get banned again for even posting this!

But seriously, you cant call somebody fat on 4chan now? What the fuck is this shit?
I'm sick of this "no singling out people" shit. Tbis is cgl, if you wanted an accepting wave of psudeofeminist hambeasts to praise you, you should go to tumblr.

>>7553556
ironically all the pseudofeminist tumblrstravaganza bullcrap is okay, but call them out on it and you get the banhammer

>>7553567
Yeah the trolls pretending to be man-hating SJWs and posting "men are scum!" constantly are really annoying. Why don't they ever get banned? That's just really hypocritical.

>>7553567
I don't get these posts in this thread. I never see SJW text posts here unless they're a joke or trolling. Do you take them literally? Or is this a case where you attack anyone that's like "this coord isn't terrible just BECAUSE someone's [black/brolita/etc], here's what can be improved" and go "GO BACK TO TUMBLR FEMINIST WHORE", get banned, then get pissed that your post got deleted?

Because I see shit like that in threads all the time and it amazes me how little self-awareness people like that have.

If you want me to investigate any specific examples of inappropriate deletions, please give me post numbers or links on http://rbt.asia/cgl/

However, checking the logs shows that fewer than 20 threads were deleted in the last seven days, and none of them are jumping out at me as being inappropriate.

Hey MOOT! (Trying the 3 times to summon theory)

I really, really HATE that we can't have fitness threads on /cgl/ anymore. I posted one not realizing the rules had changed, and it immediately was deleted and I got banned. Fucking ridiculous.

Fitness is a valid cosplay topic, and I am pissed my only alternative is to deal with the cesspool that is /fit/. So my cosplay fitness thread can be invaded by douchebags saying "tits or gtfo" or "plz b in london", or "post pics so I can help ;)" and all of the general /fit/ fuckery. Really?

After my ban was lifted, I did go to /fit/ and post a cosplay fitness thread and they were like "wtf are you doing here, go back to /cgl/ cunt." So yeah.

>>7553192
>>7553212
I have a theory that the janitor really likes Voldie. That's why you get instabanned just for talking to her and why you get banned for calling out autism-chan as well, if they are indeed one in the same.
I've gotten banned just for pointing out a poster was autism-chan and that people shouldn't reply to it. She also seems to get unbanned very quickly.
I think we can all agree that the pseudofeminism and fedoras need to go, but not all this other shit.

>>7553585
>Fitness is a valid cosplay topic
Not really. You can argue about getting fit to be more accurate to the character, but the process itself is hardly part of the cosplay. It's just exercise and diet, there's no special cosplay lifting plan.
Also, unless you went to /fit/ saying "Hey I want to look like this ripped anime guy in 3 weeks for a costume for my nerd convention, will you guys help me???" I don't see why they'd kick you out.

>>7553585
>>7553615
I think it is a valid topic, like I'd rather have fatties get helpful advice from us than go to /fit/ and have male-centric fitness advice shoved down their throat.
Like if somebody wants to learn to lose weight or get their bum in shape for a cammy cosplay then they should be able to ask for advice from people who will actually give it to them.

>>7553615
If makeup and bras are valid cosplay/Jfashion topics, so is fitness. The fitness threads existed for the same reason these existed: because the relevant board (/fa/) is terrible at those subjects and not largely female like /cgl/ is.

The problem with the fitness threads wasn't that they were "off topic", it was that A. They were constantly being dragged off topic with arguments about whether or not they were board relevant and B. Some of them became less about fitness and more about eating disorders.

>Also, unless you went to /fit/ saying "Hey I want to look like this ripped anime guy in 3 weeks for a costume for my nerd convention, will you guys help me???" I don't see why they'd kick you out.
You're implying the people participating in those topics were male. Fit is a terrible place for women because the sticky is geared towards men so some of the information in it (like calorie intake) is wildly incorrect for women. Likewise, you can't ask for advice pertaining to women's health and fitness because most of them haven't the slightest clue about it e.g. "Hey fit how do I lose cellulite?" "Lose weight, fatty."

>>7552986
>Shitposting trips everywhere
>What the hell are you talking about? New /cgl/ is super anti tripfag and they're almost non existant.

I do think that bans and thread deletions were getting heavy handed. I remember I used to post threads in character as famous comedians such as Rodney Dangerfield, Seinfeld, Chris Rock and Groucho Marx where about cosplay conventions and nerd culture. I thought they were on topic given how I was talking about everything from cosplay construction, cosplay celebrities, convention trends etc however I later find my threads deleted and banned for shitposting. I don't understand why that happened as I kept everything contained in my own thread and only responded when I wanted to add another comedy routine as opposed to trying to rallying up anon.

Sad to admit but I stopped because of that as I didn't want another ban.

The bra thread had gotten derailed to hell so much

It started with "Can I be a male fitter to touch boobs?) then to "Why won't you fat bitches let a male fitter touch your breast sexist scum??!" and even I reported that shit and it went unnoticed for a while.


There's also been threads that can fit into the suggestion and help threads instead of making their own. Like that guy who wants to cosplay a brony or something...
Either there /r9k/ or some other boards are leaking, or /cgl/ is really feeling the summer already.

>>7553855
well that's because everyone's just taking bait. why don't you report the creepers instead? replying to them just encourages them and you know it.

>>7553581
http://rbt.asia/cgl/thread/S7552757
i've made a lolita penpal from these threads. uhm, we talk about taobao, anime, co-ords, new releases, food and lolita stuff. so i don't think this deserved deletion. if anything, posters who start writing like they're in /soc/ should be reported and banned individually.

>>7553896
I personally didn't reply at all just watched it all go down then reported/hid the thread and comments, but I'm upset that it happens so often


Like I posted earlier I'm salty for getting banned yet this goes unnoticed.

>>7553896

last I checked it's pretty much this now . It's just so off topic

>>7553770
>Fit is a terrible place for women because the sticky is geared towards men so some of the information in it (like calorie intake) is wildly incorrect for women.
The sticky's information works perfectly fine for women. The have formulas for telling how many calories you need by body weight. It also has links to resources. All of the exercises work for women just as well, including SS.

And no, you can't get rid of cellulite without losing weight, and even then its not guarenteed. No such thing as spot reduction, etc. I've also seen cosplay body threads go on perfectly fine on /fit/.

I agree that there's absolutly no reason for there to be /fit/ threads on /cgl/.

>>7553581
>http://rbt.asia/cgl/

http://rbt.asia/cgl/thread/S7529485#p7529768

That entire thread has any mentioning of misuse of mod power as being deleted.

>>7553935
>The have formulas for telling how many calories you need by body weight.
Last time I looked there they were giving raw "rough" numbers for calorie intake, they must have changed it or I'm mixing the sticky up with someone's personal post.

>And no, you can't get rid of cellulite without losing weight, and even then its not guarenteed.
You can't get rid of cellulite period. Getting rid of cellulite by losing fat is more or less a myth. If you have cellulite, you have cellulite. I'm 140 at 5'11", I can see my ribs, have a thigh gap, yet I have the worst cellulite of anyone I know.

Cellulite comes from the way connective tissue in women is straight, rather than crossed like in men. Since its fat pushing upwards, you would think that losing fat would reduce it, but to get rid of it completely would require you to drop to an unhealthy bf %, and women need a higher bf % than men because it's vital for ovulation. There are fit, weight-lifting women who still have cellulite in their butt and thighs despite having visible six packs and back muscles.

You don't get rid of cellulite by losing fat, you don't reduce cellulite by losing fat. You get rid of cellulite by either completely altering your genes or becoming a man.

Of course, when I posted about this in fat I got the same old "lose fat" response about a dozen times and absolutely no one explaining how it works like I just did.

>>7553318
Moot is sucha qt 3.14 :3c

>friend search thread
Sounds like >>>/soc/ garbage to me.

Is it true that saying moot three times in a thread summons him?

>>7554792
>implying you'd find lolita friends on /soc/
Come on, anon.

I miss the comedy threads, WAYW (as long as it was jfashion), closet cosplay, ita dress ups, and secret threads.
For example, that "I totes got beat up while cis playing Grell u guise!" Thread was relevant to this board and did start a good conversation (albeit slightly derailed a bit) however the moment someone started "doxing" the chick, that poster should have gotten banned, not the whole thread deleted.
I started a thread once asking about if anyone has gotten scammed by her or has any orders out (no it wasn't you-know-who) and I got banned for "doxing". No more than a day later, someone else starts the same damned thread and it maxed out three threads. Fucking Christ.
We gotta tip toe around here anymore. It's ridiculous.

ITT: Raise your hand if you think the janitor on a powertrip

>>7555611
>Raise your hand if you want to be banned.

>>7552972
i was banned from that thread too and i was like "oh alright, i wasn't the only one but okay"