[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/cgl/ - Cosplay & EGL


View post   

File: 40 KB, 636x960, haenuli.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7397384 No.7397384[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

New releases thread! Haenuli's coming out with a jewels print, Baby has their Japan-only Snow White collab, AP has Dreamy Girl, I'm sure a bunch of other brands have stuff too.

Personally, I'm torn about the Haenuli Ball of Starlight. I love the skirt design, but I hate how gaudy the bodice is.

>> No.7397392

>>7397384
The more I see haenuli's stuff, the less lolita it becomes.

>> No.7397393

>>7397384
I don't like this kind of neckline with a blouse underneath.

>> No.7397433

>>7397393
Agreed. What could you possibly wear underneath this dress?

>> No.7397485

>>7397433
A white chiffon blouse with a square neckline.

>> No.7397490

>>7397392
I'm ok with that. It's like stuff I can wear as I get into my 30s without looking like an ageplaying unicorn.

>> No.7397497

>>7397485
no

>> No.7397541

>>7397433
Id use a chiffon blouse with a small ruffle at the neck and princess sleeves IF i wore a blouse... I think a bolero would be miles better though.

>> No.7397571

>>7397497
idk how else to phrase it, but the square neckline so that it doesn't show. I also had princess sleeves in mind. It would do nicely with the ruffled hem. You could try a white fur stole with plenty of rhinestone accessories, white patterned stocking and sliver shoes to match the accessories. But that's just one way to go. I think anything with an elegant them would do nicely.

>> No.7397585

>>7397384
I hate to bash designs but this is so horrible, not even as lolita. You'd have to pay me to wear that.

>> No.7397596

This is the one she was asking some design input for on facebook too. Idk. The neckline and the shoulder width will make most blouses awkward. It looks more like a full-skirted cocktail dress from the 1950's than lolita.

>> No.7397599

>>7397433
I agree with square neckline or a very large and wide peter pan collar to put on top.
its an incredibly uncute neckline..

>> No.7397608

>>7397596
She didn't incorporate any of the advice she was given. Some of it was really smart, too. It's unclear why she asked at all.

>>7397392
I agree. This isn't lolita.

>> No.7397645

>>7397608
I don't Facebook - any interesting copy pasta to share?

>> No.7397655

>>7397384
From the preview, I thought the top was like a skull or something, and I was hoping the bottom was littered in bones or skeletons or something spoopy, or just straight up sparkles.

I was disappointed.

>> No.7397675

>>7397384
i cant believe this lolita. I thought it was some vintage dress.

its amazing

>> No.7397686

>>7397675
Personally I wouldn't call it lolita, it looks just like some vintage A-line dress, especially with the bodice. It's still a cute dress though.

>> No.7398188

I really like this dress. The bodice and skirt don't seem to match but I like the direction it's going in. It's a more 'normal' kind of 'Lolita'. Not casual but more like clothing you could wear without standing out too much but still looking nice. Kind of like a prom dress with a Lolita outline.

>> No.7398267
File: 62 KB, 617x525, 1393469883938.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7398267

Fix'd.

>> No.7398271

>>7398267
It still looks off - it looks more like a square-dancing type shape rather than a traditional lolita silhouette.

>> No.7398278

>>7398271
its probably that small waist vs the big skirt.

>> No.7398298
File: 152 KB, 2048x1365, 1393514229074.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7398298

All I want is the skirt part.
I just know that in the front of this photo is that awful bodice......
Oh and pic is from their fb

>> No.7398345

If they make a skirt version I will be on that shit with the fury of a thousand suns.

>> No.7398349

>>7398298
I sort of want to buy it and then replace or remove the top but I'm terrified I'd screw it up.

>> No.7398351

So since when did Hanueli not make skirt versions? Chill.

>> No.7398361

Does anyone know when Dreamy Girl is supposed to go up? How popular do you think it will end up being?

>> No.7398362

I actually think it's really nice. Not lolita, but pretty. Dem 50s proportions, though, the waist is fine but I'd never fit into it with my tiny bust. I'm a failure as a woman.

>> No.7398365
File: 117 KB, 797x580, 1393518885277.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7398365

Thoughts about JetJ's upcoming spring releases?

I know I'm probably the only one, but I personally like the black OP on the left (even though it's a big too expensive for a plain dress for me, so I'm gonna try to get it second hand some day), and the piano key dress is very cute imo. That blue dress in the right corner also looks promising. The blouse and lace stole (?) also seem interesting. The two printed dresses and the printed skirt look ugly though imo.
They always feature a few items in the GLB which they never release btw (and it almost always used to be the non printed items in the past), I'll keep my fingers crosses that we'll see a bit more diversity in releases from JetJ this year.

>> No.7398368

>>7398365
Love all the plain dresses, I hope JetJ get back to making more elaborate non-print dresses.

>> No.7398379

>>7398365
Do you know where the scans for the latest GLB are? I can't find them myself

>> No.7398388

I really love the snow white collab items. How much do you think they're going to resell for, am I going to have to spend an arm and a leg and another arm?

>> No.7398397

>>7398388
Just get a shopping service and get one. I think it's more of a problem of finding a person willing to sell their item.

>> No.7398415

I was thinking about getting AP's Romantic Roster Letter, but all the items have disappeared from the English store. Does this typically mean they are gone forever, or is there hope of them coming back?

>> No.7398440
File: 92 KB, 679x960, lief noble tea.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7398440

Thoughts on this? I really love the color but I don't know what I could coord this with.

>> No.7398445

>>7398415
You'll only find it secondhand unfortunately. It was a really popular series so wait until the hype goes down to get it for a less inflated price

>> No.7398656

>>7398351
If you look on her FB, she says she's not making a skirt version for this one.

>> No.7398661

>>7398656
>she says she's not making a skirt version for this one
Ugh, she's retarded for making people having to buy her wonky, ugly bodice dress.
Ten bucks says everyone will just alter it into a skirt and do something with the leftover fabric anyway.

>> No.7398669
File: 39 KB, 601x102, 1393530500809.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7398669

Maybe my Engrish is off, but how can a skirt cost the same as a jsk when it clearly uses less materials and printing since it doesn't have a bodice stuck onto it?

>> No.7398691

>>7398669
That bodice is such a simple shape, and no embellishment, so all the "action" is in the skirt (two fabrics, all those ruffles) so it makes sense to me that the skirt would not be much cheaper. She said _almost_ the same, not the same.

>> No.7398699

>>7398669

I notice the skirt is a full circle skirt, which needs a lot of fabric to lay out the shape (even if you cut it as two half circles it still requires a lot of fabric). It's possible that her highest cost component is the specialty printed fabric, so the cost savings in not making a bodice just isn't all that significant (and is probably offset by needing to make a waistband anyway).

>> No.7398703

>>7398691
But it does have a pretty complicated print design on it. And iirc, printing fabric with elaborate (re good quality) designs like that can get pretty pricey. After all isn't that one of the reasons people say indie designers are justified to mark up their printed designs?

Unless they seriously inflate their prices to begin with, I don't see how there could be less than a $50 gap between the bodice and skirt portion.

>> No.7398704
File: 203 KB, 664x554, uiymt.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7398704

>>7398365
The black OP is gorgeous in the magazine spread, but it looks really bad in their stock photos and doesn't fit the model correctly. And yeah, the price seems really high for such a simple design, especially since they have dresses with a lot more ruffles and detailing for lower prices.

>> No.7398710

>>7398704
I love the return to simple, understated design but hate how shiny the fabric looks. Oh well.

>> No.7398713

>>7398704
They couldn't find better fabric than that?

>> No.7398715

>>7398713
This.
It isn't worth its price at all. MM, IW and Victorian Maiden have released better stuff with similar designs.

>> No.7398716

>>7398704
oh goodness, looks like milano in this picture...

>> No.7398717

>>7398710
>>7398713
I think the fabric is a shantung which is actually quite nice in person (Chantilly uses it for a lot of their dresses), but it looks more shiny when photographed.

>> No.7398718

>>7398440
I would use either a cream or white blouse. And lean towards a classic/sweet style similar to IW

>> No.7398721

>>7398717
I get that.
But I don't think this type of fabric works with this cut of dress. On Chantilly's dresses it just makes sense.

>> No.7399047

>>7397384
This is the perfect New Years dress.

>> No.7399341

Has anyone ever used Tenso to reserve from Baby?

>> No.7399359
File: 94 KB, 480x640, B38OJ220-bl.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7399359

Baby needs to calm down with the ruffles. Mon Petit Chouchou is a busy print, so a dress with a simpler design would work way better. The OP looks alright at least.

>> No.7399364

>>7399359
2-3 rows would be fine and still OTT. 5 is kind of pushing it.

>> No.7399367
File: 141 KB, 480x640, rufflebeast.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7399367

>>7399359
This is Baby we're talking about, anon.

>> No.7399377
File: 57 KB, 500x667, sweetieviolet.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7399377

how "new" is this? I want to see the dark colorway as a garment, the photos I saw only had a bow

Not that I'm going to buy it though, looks pretty short

>> No.7399382
File: 270 KB, 614x471, 1365059103951.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7399382

>>7398656
If this is true I'm a little upset.

>> No.7399383
File: 83 KB, 480x640, tumblr_n1jfwvbWtA1qgjjjyo1_500.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7399383

>>7399359
petit loulou is way cuter

>> No.7400059

>>7397384
Other way around for me- love the bodice, hate the skirt. Not as lolita, though.

>>7398368
Same.

>> No.7400110
File: 97 KB, 480x640, babybaroque3[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7400110

>>7399359

I think since Seeking Baroque seems to be a popular print, they're trying to recreate something similar, except with teddy bears and cutesy things.

I don't get why there are three of all the pictures in a row, though. Is it Goldilocks related? One too big, one too small, one just right?

>> No.7400111
File: 52 KB, 720x295, Na1393259454745[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7400111

>>7399377

It's so new, it hasn't been released yet. It's an upcoming release, so the only photos we see now are promo photos from one of the magazines.

There's a small, teeeny little pic of the op in dark blue, if that helps

>> No.7400115
File: 441 KB, 595x842, pop[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7400115

>>7398361

There's a notice that it will go up 1st Mar (this Sat). It seems like it's not popular, however, AP makes their production runs bigger or smaller depending on what they expect demand to be, so I expect this to have a smaller production run and still sell out.

AP shop notice:
http://www.angelicpretty.com/newarrival/dreamy_girl/index.htm

>> No.7400116

>>7400110
That is the fucking most beautiful thing I have seen in a long time. New dream dress, holy shit.

>> No.7400179
File: 190 KB, 720x1018, wheeloftime.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7400179

Meta's new print is super steampunky. Clocks, zippers, buckles, the works.

>> No.7400183
File: 31 KB, 360x420, bleh.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7400183

>>7400179
The parasol's kind of cool, but this is possibly the ugliest blouse I've ever seen

>> No.7400188

>>7400179
I LOVE IT

>> No.7400195

>>7400116

lol, the first time I posted it someone said it needed to go in a bonfire

>> No.7400203
File: 27 KB, 360x420, 130410081309-0.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7400203

>>7400179
>>7400188

Oh wait but it seems like you need to get this skirt as well to achieve that look... dammit ¥14,490 just for a plain skirt.

>> No.7400207

>>7400179
The blue colorway for this is absolutely stunning.

>> No.7400229
File: 134 KB, 690x541, 1393594858622.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7400229

>>7398379
I will dump some pictures I've found from the latest GLB/Kera issue.
At first some bigger scans of the JetJ spread.

>> No.7400230
File: 201 KB, 690x1001, 1393594933560.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7400230

>>7400229

>> No.7400233
File: 153 KB, 690x710, 1393595004871.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7400233

>>7400230

>> No.7400236
File: 219 KB, 690x1136, 1393595077550.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7400236

>>7400233

>> No.7400239
File: 208 KB, 690x919, 1393595150046.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7400239

>>7400236

>> No.7400241
File: 187 KB, 690x919, 1393595221999.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7400241

>>7400239

>> No.7400242
File: 195 KB, 690x919, 1393595293955.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7400242

>>7400241

>> No.7400244
File: 178 KB, 690x1054, 1393595365119.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7400244

>>7400242

>> No.7400246
File: 87 KB, 690x448, 1393595431936.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7400246

>>7400244

>> No.7400248
File: 160 KB, 690x823, 1393595502158.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7400248

>>7400246

>> No.7400249
File: 101 KB, 690x514, 1393595569701.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7400249

>>7400248

>> No.7400251
File: 86 KB, 690x371, 1393595636525.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7400251

>>7400249

>> No.7400253
File: 183 KB, 690x899, 1393595708667.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7400253

>>7400251

>> No.7400254
File: 174 KB, 690x840, 1393595779885.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7400254

>>7400253

>> No.7400257
File: 90 KB, 690x438, 1393595848072.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7400257

>>7400254

>> No.7400260
File: 201 KB, 690x983, 1393595919913.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7400260

>>7400257

>> No.7400261
File: 229 KB, 690x1028, 1393596018576.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7400261

>>7400260

>> No.7400263
File: 274 KB, 690x1495, 1393596095100.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7400263

>>7400261

>> No.7400266
File: 229 KB, 690x1086, 1393596168870.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7400266

>>7400263

>> No.7400267
File: 136 KB, 690x534, 1393596239501.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7400267

>>7400266

>> No.7400268
File: 116 KB, 690x508, 1393596307802.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7400268

>>7400267

>> No.7400271
File: 121 KB, 690x489, 1393596376582.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7400271

>>7400268

>> No.7400275
File: 278 KB, 690x1026, 1393596530015.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7400275

>>7400271

>> No.7400277
File: 187 KB, 690x1030, 1393596603509.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7400277

>>7400275

>> No.7400278
File: 204 KB, 690x1072, 1393596676514.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7400278

>>7400277

>> No.7400279
File: 208 KB, 690x1047, 1393596750732.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7400279

>>7400278

>> No.7400282
File: 211 KB, 690x1093, 1393596824083.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7400282

>>7400279

>> No.7400284
File: 217 KB, 690x1013, 1393596897724.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7400284

>>7400282

>> No.7400285
File: 180 KB, 690x699, 1393596969199.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7400285

>>7400284

>> No.7400288
File: 232 KB, 690x1022, 1393597043563.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7400288

>>7400285

>> No.7400291
File: 247 KB, 690x1045, 1393597119596.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7400291

>>7400288

>> No.7400295
File: 239 KB, 690x1035, 1393597197433.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7400295

>>7400291

>> No.7400297
File: 237 KB, 690x1001, 1393597273114.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7400297

>>7400295

>> No.7400298
File: 241 KB, 690x1066, 1393597350176.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7400298

>>7400297

>> No.7400303
File: 204 KB, 690x1006, 1393597423051.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7400303

>>7400298

>> No.7400307
File: 233 KB, 690x983, 1393597521327.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7400307

>>7400303

>> No.7400311
File: 100 KB, 690x448, 1393597590417.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7400311

>>7400307

>> No.7400314
File: 138 KB, 690x784, 1393597661376.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7400314

>>7400311

>> No.7400319
File: 238 KB, 690x1464, 1393597737194.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7400319

>>7400314

>> No.7400322

>>7400229

You're awesome, thank you so much!

>> No.7400326
File: 216 KB, 690x964, 1393597816340.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7400326

>>7400319

>> No.7400331
File: 208 KB, 690x919, 1393597892429.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7400331

>>7400326

>> No.7400334
File: 196 KB, 690x1019, 1393597964196.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7400334

>>7400331

>> No.7400337
File: 175 KB, 690x962, 1393598037121.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7400337

>>7400334

>> No.7400339
File: 210 KB, 690x1048, 1393598110667.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7400339

>>7400337

>> No.7400343
File: 180 KB, 690x1108, 1393598182154.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7400343

>>7400339

>> No.7400345
File: 168 KB, 690x992, 1393598254689.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7400345

>>7400343

>> No.7400348
File: 202 KB, 690x1053, 1393598327439.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7400348

>>7400345

>> No.7400353
File: 206 KB, 690x1010, 1393598400015.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7400353

>>7400348

>> No.7400354
File: 213 KB, 690x1011, 1393598478982.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7400354

>>7400353

>> No.7400357
File: 169 KB, 690x938, 1393598555860.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7400357

>>7400354

>> No.7400360
File: 143 KB, 690x677, 1393598627056.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7400360

>>7400357

>> No.7400364
File: 130 KB, 690x821, 1393598708174.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7400364

>>7400360

>> No.7400367
File: 224 KB, 690x1404, 1393598788662.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7400367

>>7400364

>> No.7400371
File: 86 KB, 690x517, 1393598860390.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7400371

>>7400367

>> No.7400375
File: 195 KB, 690x919, 1393598937822.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7400375

>>7400371

>> No.7400377
File: 202 KB, 690x919, 1393599014408.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7400377

>>7400375

>> No.7400380
File: 179 KB, 690x919, 1393599085474.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7400380

>>7400377

>> No.7400381
File: 188 KB, 690x919, 1393599157327.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7400381

>>7400380

>> No.7400384
File: 138 KB, 360x480, clown.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7400384

>>7400261
ita 0.0;
>>7400311
AP hopping on the clown train on this one

>> No.7400388
File: 361 KB, 1008x1116, 1301244782995.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7400388

>>7400339
>Dat Rosa Bianca dress

>> No.7400393
File: 160 KB, 720x960, 1393599509683.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7400393

>>7400380

>> No.7400396
File: 119 KB, 690x920, 1393599583422.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7400396

>>7400393

>> No.7400398
File: 162 KB, 690x919, 1393599654702.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7400398

>>7400396

>> No.7400403
File: 167 KB, 690x919, 1393599747344.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7400403

>>7400398

>> No.7400406
File: 171 KB, 690x919, 1393599839695.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7400406

>>7400403

>> No.7400407
File: 105 KB, 480x640, 1393599908758.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7400407

>>7400406

>> No.7400410
File: 661 KB, 1102x1600, 1393600002455.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7400410

>>7400407

>> No.7400415
File: 100 KB, 539x720, 1393600089907.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7400415

>>7400410
I think these were all I got.
Last one, bonus pic of Misako

>> No.7400500

>>7400415
Aw, she looks so cute here. I like it a lot better than her usual style.

>> No.7400510
File: 43 KB, 612x597, '14SP Queen corest.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7400510

Excentrique has some new chess themed items.

>> No.7400527

>>7400236
Oh man, that dress is just the right amount of tacky to be wearable to me
Not as lolita though

>> No.7400545

>>7400406
what the fuck is this co-ord

>> No.7400556

>>7400545
OTT himeloli?

>> No.7400557

>>7400314
I really love sweet lolita, I do, but AP's stuff went from being one in a handful age play-y dresses to like, ever other one.

>> No.7400563

>>7400557
This isn't ageplay-ey it's fucking cometics.

>> No.7400622

>>7400563
Agreed. someones retarded. Ageplay is a word that gets thrown around a lot by lolitas, but majority that use it dont know the actual characteristics as a fetish.

>> No.7400660
File: 143 KB, 480x640, monpetit-bl.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7400660

>>7400375
I love the overall look of this, but the print up close is kinda fug. Like bad Photoshop of creepy dolls and teddy bears and I don't like how redundant it is with the exact same portraits placed right next to each other as in pic related.

>> No.7400666

>>7400354

I'm so excited for the card dress, bless you IW.

>> No.7400670

>>7400337
Hahah holy shit that Mam outfit

>> No.7400672

Im planning to get Dreamy Girl but its more of an impulse buy since its cute and i like the print,but its nothing too special. Am i wasting money on a print no oneelse likes?

>> No.7400677

>>7400672
It should only matter whether other people like it if you plan on turning around and selling it after a few wears. If you think it's cute and something you'll wear, you should go for it and not worry about whether it's popular.

>> No.7400681

>>7400677
Well it would be nice to know if theres a demand for it so ill know whether its easy or difficult to sell when im bored of it

>> No.7400683

>>7400672
>planning to buy it
>Impulse buy

Sort of contradicting yourself there.

>> No.7400689

>>7400660

Saying this again, I wonder if it's a Goldilocks-themed print. One too big, one too small, one is just right, and bears everywhere.

>> No.7400704
File: 97 KB, 397x295, 329-49-32-.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7400704

>>7398669
Her defiance really gets me sometimes.
She posted the navy dress when it was still a prototype asking people for critique awhile back.
Multiple people told her to change the bodice design (she didn't) and to make a skirt (which looks like she isn't going to be doing either).

People are literally saying they'll throw money at her for these changes, yet she won't do it.
Does she like making her products unsellable?
Does she like not making money?
Just seems like you can do both without the hassle of running a brand based on consumer demand.

>> No.7400710

>>7400689
I really want some porridge now, damn you

>> No.7400752
File: 32 KB, 640x960, 1393615315025.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7400752

They posted the model photos of this.
It makes all of there shoulders look huge.
My shoulders are already huge.
I am still tempted to get it and modify it into a sweetheart bodice.

>> No.7400756

>>7400704
it always bothers me that she asks for advice and then never takes it. what the hell is her problem? she's actively turning away potential buyers, like you said.

>> No.7400782
File: 114 KB, 686x960, kingdomoflolitablack.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7400782

>>7400704
remember when Baroque came out with the "King of Lolita" designs and people begged for a skirt design because they didn't like empire waist bodices? they said they wouldn't do a different bodice, but they did make a skirt. that move made them a lot of money. haenuli would do well to learn from them.

>> No.7400805

>>7400207
pics?

>> No.7400823

>>7400752
I'm tempted too, but after seeing that it's obvious I'll have to rip it apart to make my man shoulders look smaller ;-;

>> No.7400828

>>7398440
I love this. I've never bought from Lief before. How much do their releases usually cost? I want it but dat customs.

>> No.7400889

>>7400326
Gorgeous.

>> No.7400905

>>7400752
i hate this tiered bs.
so ugly

>> No.7400911

>>7399383

My nigga

>> No.7401088
File: 93 KB, 450x525, 2014timelag-blue.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7401088

>>7400805
Not that anon, but this is the colorway. It's on their website.

>> No.7401094

>>7400179
I hate it and love it at the same time... I love the socks and need those in every color though, and I'm tempted to get the parasol for the hell of it.

>> No.7401103

>>7400111
I really love this. How popular do you think Sweetie Violet will be (particularly the OP) ? I'm probably going to order it, but I don't want to be stuck with an unsellable dress if I end up not liking it.

>> No.7401114

>>7400752
That bodice really doesn't look good at all without the extremely nipped-in waist of the mannequin.

>> No.7401131
File: 50 KB, 640x960, 1393628591432.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7401131

>>7400752
Looking at the model pictures, half of them don't even have the model wearing a petti or blouse. I love the skirt part, but it feels more like a retro inspired formal dress rather than lolita.

>> No.7401246
File: 39 KB, 640x960, 1393632430008.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7401246

>>7401131
I don't know, it looks like they're wearing a petticoat to me. Just a less strong one.

>> No.7401551
File: 10 KB, 399x102, harnuli.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7401551

>>7401131
>>7401246
Confirmed for no petti

>> No.7402404

>>7400406
Finally, somebody perfects the hobo-lita substyle.
>she wears all her burando to keep warm on the cold winter nights

>> No.7402413

>>7400828
nearly brand prices, i believe this one is in the 285 range

>> No.7402416

>>7400415
Dang that hair is cute! Its really balanced too, whenever I do buns like that it looks odd and missplaced.

>> No.7402417 [DELETED] 

>>7400364
FINALLY
VIOLETS

FUCKING VIOLETS

>>7400360
>>7400357
ARURUUGUGUHUHUHUHH!!!!!!!!11

>> No.7402420
File: 1.13 MB, 230x190, YESSSSSSSS.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7402420

>>7400364
FINALLY
VIOLETS

FUCKING VIOLETS

>>7400360
>>7400357
ARURUUGUGUHUHUHUHH!!!!!!!!11

>> No.7402425

>>7400319
>>7400326
>>7400311
>>7400242
too much of my fancy has been tickled
may as well just buy the magazine now. thanks for posting!

>> No.7402429

>>7398298
the back looks so perfect tho...

>> No.7402434

>>7402425
is J-list a good site to order the magazine from by the way?
i saw the kerfuffle about the Otome no Sewing purchase prices and thought to make sure since I dont know too many online japanese merchants...

>> No.7402436

>>7402434
ok, Ebay is selling theres 27 shipped, J-list is $29 shipped so scratch that

>> No.7402541
File: 31 KB, 550x825, 1209040.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7402541

Update for Haenuli's Ball of Starlight release:

There is a skirt.
But it's $250.
It also doesn't come with the chiffon underskirt, that's sold separately for $50.
And she removed the waist ties with the cute bow.

>> No.7402543
File: 27 KB, 512x384, unimpressed.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7402543

>>7402541
Anddddd she just lost my business.

>> No.7402554
File: 84 KB, 250x256, 296.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7402554

>>7402541
She had the recipe for success placed reverently in her hands by people willing to throw money at her. How do you fuck up this bad.

>> No.7402557

Why are you guys so buttranged over this shitty photoshop brush star print? It looks like total garbage and anyone could make it.

>> No.7402565

>>7402541
A that point you may as well order the JSK and alter it. Not gonna lie though, the chiffon underskirt is tempting.

>> No.7402578

>>7402541
>essentially a $300 dollar skirt
That's a really bold price for a designer who frequently fucks up the fit and design of her garments.
Also it's really not that hard to make an overskirt with a fishtail, that price is in no way justified.

>> No.7402581

>>7402578
Is that skirt even a fishtail? It looks asymmetrical but that could just be the picture. It doesn't have enough poof and the photo looks lazy.

>> No.7402594

>>7402581
Oh sorry, you're probably right. Asymmetrical is a better term, but still.

>> No.7402600

>>7402594
The skirt part of the JSK is a fishtail though(I think) I was more pointing it out since it looks even less like the JSK's skirt area.

>> No.7402781

>>7400279
>>7400285
Goddamn that long JSK is gorgeous. I'm not too keen on Moitie's prints, but their floral items are really nice.

>> No.7402984

>>7402557
This lol

All of her designs since Stained Glass have been awful, I don't get the Haenuli hype anymore.

>> No.7403147

http://egl.livejournal.com/19579761.html?nojs=1
>This design was made with accident, cause the bodice print came so huge, so I was going to give up. But when I pin this fabirc to bodice it comes to lovely dress to me :)

Well, that explains a lot.

I actually do like this as a prom dress affair but it doesn't tickle my lolita bones.

>> No.7403207

>>7402984
Agreed, her fairy tale prints were nice, and Stained Glass was phenomenal. But Little Prince and Enchanted Fawn felt like bandwagon prints, and that angel print was just awful.

If she rereleases Stained Glass though, I will throw so much money at her.

>> No.7403314

>>7400179
I fucking love this jsk, but I already spent my money on Girly Things and now I have none left. qq etc.

>> No.7403442

>>7402541
The underskirt is $15 is you buy the Skirt or JSK.

>> No.7403460

>>7403442
Pretty sure it's $15 off, so $40.

>> No.7404117

>>7400242
I like the boots, but the seem kind of bondage looking to me. idk

>> No.7404130

>>7400782
They are offering a skirt only version but it's still got that odd cut to it.

>> No.7404136

>>7403460
How did you get $15 off of $50 to equal $40? It'd be $35.

>> No.7404141

>>7402420
omfg are you me? I love this print! Is it worth reserving it or will it be cheaper 2nd hand?

>> No.7404152

>>7404136
if you look at the actual page, the skirt is 55. so yea, 40

>> No.7404157

>>7404136
The chiffon underskirt is 55 USD

>> No.7404158

>>7397392
amen to that. I have something from Sleeping Beauty, and comparing this... it doesn't even look like the same brand. Haenuli used to be my favorite, but this looks like a fucking prom dress, honestly... It makes me really sad.

>> No.7404159

>>7404141
I HAVE NO IDEA
I mean honestly it shouldnt matter really since what you want is what you want, but since its just you an I who seem interested enough to point it out so far I guess it would be more economical 2nd hand or in a likely scenerio, they put it on sale in an unpopular colourway (navy, lilac and periwinkle are definitely my colours so it doesnt bother me either way).
It says its selling for 23800 yen so it doesnt sound that bad anyway.
Would love to see what the bodice looks like more closely though!

>> No.7404163

>>7404141
Thirding this notion of shitting yourself over violets print

Honestly from the hype it's gotten I think it'd be better to reserve it

>> No.7404171

>>7400179
holy shit, steampunk is overplayed as hell and probably should have died in like 2009 but that shade of green, that underskirt... WHYYYY
i need it

>> No.7404301

>>7402413
Damn. I'll never find it second-hand, will I? Does anyone know if Ergi's Lief items are shipped from Sweden or if they're shipped directly from Korea? If they come from Sweden I don't have to pay duty.

>> No.7404306

>>7404301
Goes through Sweden if you're in the EU

>> No.7404309

>>7404306
Great, thanks! Now I just have to find out if they're getting this series. Yay!

>> No.7404335

>>7402413
That's more than most brand's prices (aside from Moitie and a couple others)

>> No.7404359

>>7400111
I really want that dark blue, like whoa...

>>7400254
Dangerous Nude? Is that a brand I've never heard of? I don't know exactly what's going on with those dresses in the upper right, but I like it...

>>7404163
YEHEAYHEYAHEYAHHHH shitting myself and im not even a sweet lolita

>> No.7404374
File: 19 KB, 262x350, Dangerous Nude Gauze OP.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7404374

>>7404359
Pic related on their website. I don't know their quality. Does anyone have any experience with Dangerous Nude? It seems small, so I assume you would need a shopping service.

It looks like it needs a corset or something.

>> No.7404403

>>7404163
Fourth person here, if it came big enough I'm definitely getting it!

>> No.7404412

>>7404374
That's a really pretty OP, anon!
I don't know much about DN but they seem like another Chantilly/Atelier Pierrot type of small company, I don't think it'd be Bodyline quality if that's what you're worried about.

If you can get an SS, get it and post a review. I'm curious and wouldn't find owning this! You can even sell it to me if you don't like it, haha!

>> No.7404422

>>7404412
I'll think about it! It's only about $97 before SS fees and such, so I might look into it.

>> No.7404423

>>7404374
Their quality isn't great, it's a lot lower on average than the major lolita brands but better than Bodyline. They're more of a punk/goth brand than lolita.

>> No.7404432

>>7404423
Oh, really? Thank you for the info!

>> No.7404901
File: 37 KB, 360x420, 150410081309-0.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7404901

>>7400179
DAT LEATHER BONNET THOUGH

>> No.7404938

>>7404901
Now I want it in black to go with their older leather OPs....

>> No.7405810
File: 42 KB, 720x960, 1393821135839.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7405810

New LadySloth. I love the print, but hate what she did with it. You can't even see their faces.

>> No.7405815
File: 48 KB, 720x960, 1393821246070.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7405815

Another new LadySloth. Love the design of the dress, especially the steam on the straps. But the pleats hide the roses, and I wish they weren't yellow!

>> No.7405836

>>7405810
>>7405815
these pictures have some weird f+f feel to them

>> No.7405841

>>7405815
Same here, but I think I'm going to get it
>>7405810
The close up of the one face is pretty funny, I wish it had some white lace around the bodice like the one JetJ painting dress

>> No.7406161

>>7405841
I hate yellow, but I might get it..... idk
The ladies dress is listed as a limited thing. so if you want it, get it. i'm pretty sure it wouldn't be that big of a deal for her to add some white lace.