[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/cgl/ - Cosplay & EGL


View post   

File: 116 KB, 483x630, 138688473371.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7317557 No.7317557[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

What outfit is this girl wearing?

>> No.7317567

propably some ebay monstrosity

>> No.7317571
File: 93 KB, 250x333, 1390303038828.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7317571

>>7317557
Angelic Pretty - Whimsical Vanilla-chan Tiered JSK

>> No.7317578
File: 629 KB, 960x720, polita.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7317578

>>7317567
>being this new

>> No.7317588

>>7317578
Been in lolita for 7 years actually. Can't know everything, I pretty much know only the dresses I've been interested of.

>> No.7317590

>>7317588
I call bullshit, someone who has been in the fashion for that long should be able to tell AP from an ebay piece of shit, even if sweet isn't their style. Not to mention the drama around this poster was pretty huge when it first came out. Lurk more.

Fuck off back to itaville where you belong.

>> No.7317598

>>7317590
Please tell me more how you can judge me from anonymous posts on teh internets. Not every lolita is into pastel crap. Have a nice day, little brat.

>> No.7317600

>>7317598
If you'd been into lolita for 7 years, you would know about this documentary, be able to recognize AP and know of Hello Lace where you can easily find prints and identify them. What a thinly veiled lie.

>> No.7317603

>>7317598
>>7317600
Oh, and you wouldn't call it an "outfit", you would ask what the name of the JSK is. You're sad.

>> No.7317607

>>7317598
Different anon, but someone's being a little too sensitive here.

>even if sweet isn't their style
Did you even read what >>7317590 said, no duh sweet doesn't have to be everyone's cup of tea, but 7 years is a enough time to be exposed to different brands evven if you don't like them.

>> No.7317609

>>7317598
Lol you got called out on your shit, just drop it.
You were wrong, no need to lie :^)

>>7317603
Dont tell me you think >>7317567 is OP, or youre even more of a fuckwit.

>> No.7317610

>>7317609
When did I say that I thought they were the same person? I was referring to the OP's original post. Did you even read that properly or is it a misfire?

>> No.7317620

>>7317557
Wow, lolita fashion is more out there than I thought.

>> No.7317619

>>7317610
You quoted that person when saying that so.....

>> No.7317649

>>7317619
I was quoting myself (not the person saying it was from eBay, wtf?) to add something, and quoting the OP. You're pretty dense.

>> No.7317654

>>7317598
Poor baba. Tell us more about your extensive classic wardrobe (which likely consists of two thrifted 1950s dresses and a few of your mom's old secretary blouses. So classical rori desu) and how superior the style is to sweet.

>> No.7317658

I've never seen this film but I did hear about all the backlash and shit it stirred up.

Apparently the girls in the film were deceived into thinking they were shooting a documentary celebrating lolita?

>> No.7317665

boku no lolita kpop princess pico outfit~ no dur

>> No.7317669

>>7317658
No, they only did a photoshoot. No interview, no talking, just photos.

This is the WHOLE segment. Notice how lacking it is.
http://youtu.be/JEorRIkEWFw

>> No.7317882

The whole documentary was actually quite interesting in a horrifying way. It was basically just a guy trying to defend paedophilia. Just horrible....

>> No.7317951
File: 36 KB, 299x382, 1390322252853.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7317951

Fuckin' hell girls, chill your beans!

>> No.7317957

>>7317665
fund it!

>> No.7317966

>>7317951
get dat squirrel outta mah face!

>> No.7318103

>>7317607
I've been into lolita for just over a year, mainly focusing on classic, and even I have the name of that print branded into my memory

>> No.7318109

did anyone else laugh at "Dick Swaab" or

>> No.7318630

>>7318109
No I came into the thread to see if someone had mentioned it

>> No.7319067

>>7317669
The narrators voice is so obnoxious

>> No.7319069

Are you guys done feeding the troll yet?