[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/cgl/ - Cosplay & EGL


View post   

File: 119 KB, 464x556, 1352259376032.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6390742 No.6390742[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

You sluts ready for your free birth control under Obama?

Now you can hook up at cons without any consequences.

>> No.6390760

btw i'm a girl XD :3 teehee

>> No.6390762

Is it actually 100% free? In Canada my insurance didn't cover it completely and I paid abour $14 for 3 months. Also in England I think you have to pay like £8 or something.

>> No.6390764

>>6390762
It's free in the UK.

>> No.6390771

>>6390742
>go to a con to break that insufferable dry streak
>decides to hump the crease in the sofa instead

>> No.6390780

>>6390742
It's free if you make a certain amount of money and are in a certain number of ways, it's complicated

>> No.6390781

I pay about $20 for three months' worth in Australia, and that's for the anti-acne/more expensive brand.

>> No.6390785
File: 36 KB, 250x331, 1350613581725.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6390785

But I pay taxes.

>> No.6390794

>>6390785
Yes, but your taxes won't cover all of it. I have to pay for your vagina. Why? You never pay for my dick.

>> No.6390803

>>6390794
btw i'm a gurl :3. Don't hit on me you silly boys XD

>> No.6390804

>>6390803
Don't worry xD I won't hit on you, if anything, I'll be the one who's getting hit on :D

>> No.6390855

>>6390781
Are you serious? I was prescribed one of the more expensive ones for my acne and the generic brand is $60 for three months.
Sage for off-topic.

>> No.6390865

>>6390855
Hm, in aus? For context, I never get pimples but when I started the pill I started getting them. So I switched to another type and now my skin's back to normal.

>> No.6390900

just report and hide. If you don't respond they'll tire them selves out eventually.

>> No.6390950

ITT: In this thread:
Loose sluts being sluts and irresponsible.

>> No.6390967

>>6390950
>>birth control
>>irresponsible

>> No.6390974

>>6390967
You're being trolled. You know what trolling is right? Someone tries think of something to get replies. That's it.

>> No.6391031

>>6390762
No, its not free. Nothing is "free" from the government. You are paying for it with your lovely new tax raise disguised as free health care. Good job you stupid whores.

>> No.6391056
File: 10 KB, 90x83, 235467896457365.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6391056

I am really happy for all american women who can afford birth control under Obama now, for whatever reason they want or need it.
In other news every comment along the lines of OP is obviously a troll or an idiot and not worth responding to in any case.

>> No.6391066

>>6391056
I wish your whore mother used birth control on you. I'm sure you'd be okay with not being alive if they killed you like that.

>> No.6391069

>>6391056
>women who can afford birth control

women could always afford birth control, its called not having sex.

>> No.6391083

>>6391069
I'm actually considering getting on birth control because I have hideous cramps that make me nearly pass out. I couldn't care less about having sex, in all honesty.

>> No.6391086

>>6391069
nofunallowed.jpg

>> No.6391089

>>6391083
Congratulations, do you want a cookie? This is the exact defense thrown out every time the "free contraceptive" issue is brought up, and every time I request a statistic for the number of women that legitimately need birth control for medical reasons no one will provide it.

Chances are you are just discomforted by your pain and so going on BC will make it easier for you, but clearly you've been able to function without it as you have not started taking it yet.

>> No.6391090

I don't care about birth control, but Dragon Age 2 was a terrible game.

>> No.6391092

>>6391086
If you are not prepared to handle to consequences of having sex (i.e. birth) then you shouldn't copulate. I don't understand why this concept is so hard.

>> No.6391097

>>6391092
Because copulation isn't the only reason people fuck?

>> No.6391101

>>6391097
Awww, sweetie if you don't even know what copulate means you're probably not old enough to have this conversation.

>> No.6391103

>>6391097

Copulation = fucking

>> No.6391108

>>6391089
Why endure if you don't have to?

As another anon though, I have to go back on bc now because my cramps came back after lessoning fir about a year, and have prevented me from going to work. I'll still pay for bc though since that's cheaper than missing work. No paid sick days at my job man.

>> No.6391113

ITT: Men that will never have sex with anything other than their hand.

You guys are looking at this from the totally wrong perspective. Not only will birth control prevent pregnancy, it can also reduce acne and make your boobs bigger! Thus reducing the number of girls with low self-esteem posting on /cgl/.

Praise!

>> No.6391114 [DELETED] 
File: 43 B, 1x1, qm.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6391114

>>6391092

>> No.6391116

>>6391092

Nobody likes babies that much.

>> No.6391120

>mfw the amount of women i can bust my load inside of without having to split the abortion bill 2 months later will be greatly increased

I approve of this.

>> No.6391121
File: 7 KB, 65x78, 3252326346.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6391121

>>6391113
Also it reduces the period bleeding, period cramps and makes the menstruation more regular! Yay for birth control.

>> No.6391124

>>6391092

>Don't want a baby, don't have sex!

>OMFG that frigid bitch turned me down!

>> No.6391130

I'm pro-life, so I think the easier it is for girls to get birth control, the less abortions will happen. People don't stop having sex just because they can't get condoms or birth control.

>> No.6391131

>>6391121

YAAAAAAY! NO MORE 16 AND PREGNANT! NO MORE TEEN MOM! NO MORE BLOOD ON MY CUTE PANTIES!

>> No.6391133
File: 11 KB, 238x431, vagaward.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6391133

>> No.6391135

>>6391133
Not sure that makes sense in this context, bro. Well, unless dudes take birth control regularly. I understand that you are trolling, but try to make sense.

>> No.6391140
File: 18 KB, 114x122, 352362467.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6391140

>>6391131
Well it only reduces the bleeding and doesn't stop it entirely so actually
>NO MORE 16 AND PREGNANT
>NO MORE TEEN MOM
>LESS BLOOD ON MY CUTE PANTIES

>> No.6391160
File: 11 KB, 170x169, 9cf26796718748c3ed3f365b2acefe30a99fc2c8_s.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6391160

>>6391092

Yeah, and let's wear a burqa and a chastity belt just in case! and even better, why not just ask Congress to declare sex for fun illegal? death penalty to every dirty immoral whore who wants to enjoy a good time with someone else, yay!.

1/10 for making me reply.

>> No.6391164

>>6391140

The only time I have that problem is on extra heavy days ;______;

>> No.6391168

>>6391160
Why would it be bad for Congress to discourage sex but it's GOOD for Congress to encourage sex?
You're no different than the "troll" you're replying to. You want Congress to legislate and enforce YOUR beliefs.

>> No.6391170

>>6391113
I see mangina chan finally made a tripname.

Don't you think it's hypocritical to make fun of other hand-sexers when you're one of them?

>> No.6391174
File: 8 KB, 236x251, 1349548950229.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6391174

>>6390760
There are no girls on the internet.

>> No.6391188
File: 11 KB, 424x335, 7923277502_d9c77b79a7.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6391188

>>6391168

>> No.6391189

feminism = I want to beat slut but not be called a slut. Also pay for me to be a hedonist.

>> No.6391190

>>6391170

Anon, I am a girl, and even the homeliest of us don't need to use our hands.

>> No.6391195

>>6391189
Uh, feminists created slut walks. They are totally okay with being called sluts, they just don't want to be mistreated for it.

>> No.6391197
File: 426 KB, 499x265, 1349248371643.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6391197

>>6391190

>> No.6391208

>>6391190
>and even the homeliest of us don't need to use our hands.
Yep, back to >>>/r9k/ mangina-chan.

Take your frustration with women elsewhere, this is a cosplay board (and you still haven't posted that cosplay as I told you to).

>> No.6391218

>>6391124
>implying I'm a man

Because no woman might not support government funded abortions and "free" contraceptives at the cost of other freedoms. I forgot my place, whoops

>> No.6391220

>>6391208

I think you have me confused for someone else. I looked and my vagina is still there.

>> No.6391225
File: 271 KB, 500x468, 1347480697063.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6391225

>>6391220
>MFW autism this early in the morning.

>> No.6391230

>>6391160
Why do you assume I'm saying don't have sex for fun? I have sex for fun all the time. I'm also in a fully committed relationship where I know if I do get pregnant I will he in a position to handle it. I didn't run around and fuck guys at 15 because I'm not a stupid whore. Sex has consequences, either you are ready for them or not but pretending like the don't exist is just retarded.

>> No.6391236

>>6391230

>taking birth control is pretending the consequences of sex don't exist

LOL wut?

>> No.6391251

>>6391220
Post a pic of your cosplay then, mangina-chan.

>> No.6391255
File: 9 KB, 73x83, 24235423534.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6391255

>>6391230
Look, it is totally nice for you to have this great relationship and I am happy for you, but my boyfriend and me, we don't want children. Not now, not ever. That is our decision, and luckily we can live it, too. We have safe sex in a commited relationship and don't have to worry about unwanted pregnancy. Relationships don't only exist for having children and raising them. It might be like that for a majority of people, but not in my case. So why should I feel obligued to have children just because I am healthy and female? What you are basically saying is, in order to be allowed to have sex you also have to want children and be in position to raise them, and that is stupid as hell.

>> No.6391256

>>6391230
THISS. Sorry ladies, but we are machines to make babies. We need to STOP denying this and start understanding that wherever a penis and a vagina come together there is always, ALWAYS a chance of babies.

We need to educate women about all this shit, THEN give them birth control.

>> No.6391280

>>6391230
>birth control is not ok but unwanted babies and unwanted responsabilities are ok


>>6391256
>we are machines to make babies
>we

speak for yourself, sweetie

>> No.6391294
File: 24 KB, 143x162, 345346346346.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6391294

>>6391280
I think >6391256 was just joking? Not sure. Thinking of women as baby machines makes me want to throw up. Like Nazi Germany or some shit.

>> No.6391295

>>6391251

NO U

I DON'T COSPLAY I LOLITA

>> No.6391301

>>6391294

They sort of aren't acknowledging that it takes a man, also. Equal responsibility.

>>captcha: co-op: arseut

SEE?!

>> No.6391304
File: 19 KB, 327x319, 1338345087892fhu.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6391304

>legislates that women should get free birth control
>continues to allow women to avoid responsibility for getting pregnant while still forcing men to accept it
>legislates pay equality laws based on a pay gap that doesn't actually exist
>can't bother to ban circumcision in the US

Not that Romney would have helped men mucheither, but at least Romney doesn't pander to males as much as Obama panders to women.

>gender quotas in STEM field majors

>> No.6391314

>>6391294
I'm pretty sure they meant that as in 'human bodies function like machines for making more human bodies'. i.e. using birth control as a patch to cover the fact that people are badly educated about sex and the consequences of such is a terrible idea, because it doesn't fix the root issue (people fucking without any sense of 'this might make a baby' and not caring because lolabortions, even though that's still not a 100% fix).

>> No.6391321

>>6391304
My uncircumcised friend continually got nasty infections in his foreskin no matter how clean he was. He finally opted to be circumcised at age 18. I'm sure that he wishes his parents would have saved him the trouble by cutting that gross shit off at birth

>> No.6391322

>>6391321
>my anecdotal evidence is proof it should be ok to cut up babies to use their body parts in cosmetics

>> No.6391328

>>6391322
i haven't met any people that are circumcised that wish they weren't. i bet you're not even a fucking guy. go control your womb and let us deal with our dicks ok

>> No.6391330

>>6391322
I dont think anon realized why you thought that it should be banned.
...Also that is disgusting. Give me proof or it's not true.

>> No.6391333

>>6391328
As a guy circumcised at birth for medical reasons, I can honestly say there are times when I've wondered what it would be like if I weren't, but for all the claims I hear of it ruining sex and whatnot, it's not like I have anything to compare it to. Ultimately, I don't care beyond curiosity, and it does look better.

>> No.6391336

>>6391255
honey, there is only one 100% fullproof way to guarantee you won't get pregnant and it involves not spreading your legs. I don't care what you are doing to pevent it, but an unwanted pregnancy is always possible as long as you are fucking.

The governtment certainly shouldn't be funding it.

>> No.6391335
File: 7 KB, 52x78, 45364768790.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6391335

>>6391301
I don't know about equal responsibility. The man is not the one with the baby in their body, who has to give birth to a human. It often seems like men don't fear unwanted pregnancy because they can just run away from it. And please don't give me "gift of god" bullshit now, some people just don't want (or can't afford) children and that's that.

>>6391314
lolabortions isn't even the point here, the point is that imo a couple should always have the choice if they want children or not, and that choice should not influence their sex habits. Sex is not a privilege for people who want and can afford a baby.

>> No.6391349

>>6391328
>i haven't met any people that are circumcised that wish they weren't.

Because they all have Stockholm syndrome and have convinced themselves that mommy knew best and she wouldn't mutilate her son for some stupid reason like "his penis will look weird!", nor do most of them even know that they've lost the most sensitive parts.

>>6391330
>Human growth factors derived from newborns' foreskins are used to make a commercial anti-wrinkle skin cream, TNS Recovery Complex

http://www.ocbj.com/news/2002/aug/05/skinmedica-seeks-niche-in-skin-care-drugs-products

>> No.6391345

>>6391336
You mean only one 100% foolproof way on it's own. If you just use condoms it isn't 100%, if you just use birth control it isn't 100%.
But combine those two and you're good.

You sound like someone who either hasn't had sex, or did and didn't know what the fuck you were doing in the first place.

By the way, the government should be doing something to help since you shitheads keep deciding that people shouldn't be taught about safe sex at all or helped in any way.

>> No.6391347
File: 37 KB, 232x199, 2345463768562.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6391347

>>6391336
Restating what I just said, you probably didn't read the post as of writing yours:
>Sex is not a privilege for people who want and can afford a baby.
Yay! There you go!
Also there is 100% "fullproof"[sic] way to guarantee that I won't get pregnant and it is called sterilizing.

>> No.6391351

>>6391335
>a couple should always have a choice if they wwnt kids or not and that choice should not effect their sex habits.

Are, are you being serious? The thing that creates the baby should not be considered when trying to avoid having a baby? This is why people think women are so god damn stupid.

>> No.6391352
File: 24 KB, 354x253, cat_hug.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6391352

>>6391218
>>6391230
>>6391304

I like you, anons. I like you very much.

>> No.6391360

>>6391336
VIRGIN

>> No.6391362

>>6391335
>that choice should not influence their sex habits
There's a difference between accepting that something is a possibility and trying to avoid it via contingencies, and flat-out just refusing to acknowledge the downsides to a choice because you feel they shouldn't matter.

Nobody's saying you should only be allowed to have sex if you want babies, but completely ignoring the fact that, short of getting your tubes tied or being infertile, the only way to guarantee a lack of pregnancy is to be abstinent is just fucking reckless and smacks of willful ignorance for the sake of pleasure.

You want to have sex? Go ahead. You want to guarantee you won't have kids? Sure. But "Waaaah it's unfair that I can't have both mutually exclusive things I want!" is not, and has never been, a mature or realistic viewpoint.

>> No.6391366

>>6391345
>double up on contraceptives
>now I'm 198% not going to get pregnant

Right, I'm the one that doesn't know anything.

>>6391347
Nope, try again. There are plenty of people that get "sterilized" and still get pregnant. Also plenty of people whe are "infertile"

>> No.6391370
File: 63 KB, 316x205, 234590.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6391370

>>6391351
No, you didn't read what I said. Sex is not only for making babies. And of course every couple should consider those things and be sensible about these things.
But you make it sound like
>sex is only there to make babies
>don't have sex if you don't want babies
>sex is only for people who want babies
and that is in every way completely ridiculous, starting from the moment where you assume that every woman and every couple wants children.

>> No.6391372

You know, it's my 20th birthday today. If I may have one wish from /cgl/ - please - report that fascist avatarfagging cunt ITT.

Please. It would be the best present in years. If you won't deal with her now, she'll soon plant the seeds of evil all over Europe, and try to cause another holocaust.

Please /cgl/. You're my only hope.

>> No.6391377
File: 35 KB, 222x186, 1254635746857.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6391377

>>6391372
Happy Birthday

>> No.6391381

Here's a quick link post for the brave men & women who stand by me.

Please, don't let that fascist cunt ruin hiimdaisy for me anyomre. Please.

>>6391370
>>6391347
>>6391335
>>6391294
>>6391255
>>6391140
>>6391121
>>6391056

>> No.6391382

>>6391366
I never said that anyone was "198% not going to get pregnant"
And I never said you knew nothing. I said you were a shithead.
Though now I'm entertaining the idea that you don't know anything. Thanks for suggesting it.

>> No.6391385

>>6391328
Hey. Hey.

Hey.

Guy with a circumcised dick here, and I sure as shit wish it wasn't.

>> No.6391386

>>6391377
You are evil incarnate. I think you're doing it on purpose because my grandparents survived Bogdanovka.

>> No.6391391

>>6391382

No, you just implied it when you said a condom and the pill is 100% fullproof. That is not true and you are stupid for believing is.

>> No.6391393
File: 27 KB, 148x177, 32423534546.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6391393

>>6391386
Either you are a troll (I really hope you are) or you really believe all the shit you are saying and get so incredibly upset over a person on the internet, in which case I suggest you step away from the computer for a second and take a deep breath and then maybe seek professional help.

>> No.6391394

>>6391370
They sound like the kind of people who say
>sex = babies
>babies should only happen after marriage
>therefore, no sex of any kind before marriage

The teens are having sex?
>instead of educating them on what they're doing, keep them ignorant to everything
>teach them only that sex = babies = BAD
>they go off and ignore you because you're a cunt
>get pregnant, bf leaves them
>Lel time to disown my kid!

>> No.6391397

>>6391391
Technically, she didn't say it. She just implied it.

Don't get me wrong, it's still bullshit, but it's the clever kind of bullshit where, when called on it, you can turn around and go "But you're putting words in my mouth! I totally never said that and it's not my fault the structure of my sentence deliberately led you to believe that was the underlying meaning".

>> No.6391401

>>6391393
I'm upset because you're ruined hiimdaisy for me and everyone else. And no matter how many times we tell you you're explicitly breaking the rules you continue.

So not only do you willingly break them, you also seem to take pleasure in shitting up a good series.

Why do you hate Persona so much?

Also, I like how you instantly spit on my grandparents and their suffering by saying that they've made everything up.

Never change Germany.

>> No.6391404
File: 198 KB, 220x165, 1310607593767.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6391404

It's pretty sweet for those of us who already take it. If you don't like free miracle pills, don't take em'. More for us "sluts".

>> No.6391405

>>6391391
I'm not going to argue with you anymore.
Though I'd like for you to answer one question for me, okay? Just one and we'll agree to disagree and leave this alone forever.

How can abstinence be 100% foolproof if the Virgin Mary got pregnant?
Shouldn't you be counting it as 98% - 99% as you do with contraceptives?

Food for thought, anon.

>> No.6391410

>>6391393
whoa, son, you sound like a hardcore cunt
I thought jerries were the kind of people who apologize for committing the holocaust instead of denying

>> No.6391416
File: 49 KB, 357x185, 4353456346.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6391416

>>6391394
I think it is absolutely important to educate people, especially teens, on sex, pregnancy, birth control, abortion, just really everything necessary. I am not sure what point you are trying to make with your post.

What is up with this high ratio of trolls in this thread? Is it because you are still all pissy that your beloved Romney didn't win so you want to shit up all women's throats in other ways available to you? Everyone needs to calm down.
I think I am going to step away from /cgl/ for a while, mostly because my next con will be in like, a year, and I have nothing important to add to cosplay discussions until then anyway. Maybe I will still come here from time to time, but don't expect much.

>> No.6391418

hell yeah i can't wait to suck ALL the dicks

>> No.6391434

>>6391416
Avatarfagging is againts the rules.

>> No.6391435

>>6391405
You're assuming the only people who accept abstinence as 100% guaranteed not to get you pregnant are religious.

Let me make it very, very obvious for you. Unless you are physically incapable of becoming pregnant, the only way to guarantee it doesn't happen is to not do the thing that causes it to happen. This is basic logic.

I'm not advocating abstinence as opposed to birth control, because kids will be kids and they're gonna fuck no matter how much you tell 'em not to. But this hardheaded denial of abstinence as an at all viable method of avoiding pregnancy on the grounds of "But I want to have sex!" is stupid.

People need proper, full education about the realities of sex and the consequences it can entail, and no matter how much you might cry about liberated women's right to sex and whatnot, a full education on the matter INCLUDES properly informing people that abstinence is honestly the only way you are guaranteed to never get pregnant. No form of birth control is 100% guaranteed, even if you're taking every precaution possible.

And on that note, there's the main reason I support abortion being made available. I'm not saying "People shouldn't fuck and if they do force them to have babies", I'm just advocating a completely honest stance that happens to include accepting the fallibility of non-abstinence pregnancy prevention.

>> No.6391432

>>6391391
It's not foolproof, but going from a 95% and 86% chance of avoiding pregnancy to a 99.3% chance of avoiding it is better. It's just 10x the chance of getting hit by lightning in your lifetime. It's not foolproof, but it's a damnsight better than one or the other, and waaay better than the "lolol asprin!" bullshit that some people spout off.

>> No.6391443

>>6391434
Arcana is well aware of that. Just report and move on.

>> No.6391441

>>6391416

>why are there so many trolls in this troll thread?

>> No.6391445

Thanks Obama! because birth control is ONLY used as a 100% FOOL-PROOF preventative measure against PREGNANCY ONLY, I can't wait to unleash my INNER RAGING WHORE

>> No.6391453

>>6391445
Don't forget the mandatory welfare allowing you to buy a yacht while sleeping all day!

>> No.6391455

>>6391432
So what are you trying to argue? I said the only 100% fullproof way to avoid getting pregnant was to not have sex and you just agreed to that. There, argument over.

>> No.6391459

>>6391445
>>6391453
You are so butthurt that Obama won, aren't you?

>> No.6391460

>>6391453
Mandatory government-funded sleeping yacht? Damn, you Americans really have it good. No wonder everybody else hates you, they're just jealous of your yacht.

>> No.6391463

>>6391416
yo, shut the fuck up, you have no right to judge our politics, nazi fag

>> No.6391468

You guys are really obsessed with a part of a woman that you probably can't tell from looking at her.

By the way, it's estimated that dysmenorrhea affects 25% of women. Meaning of all the females you (might) know, one in four of them will have insane cramps that get in the way of daily activity, such as you know, work and productivity. You guys are probably the same people who bitch about women at work not putting out (lel) as much because every month they're on their period. Well? There's a solution, but you seem really intent on simultaneously making us suffer and then using our biology against us.

>> No.6391472

>>6391445
Mutated ovaries aren't nearly common enough to warrant giving free birth control to all women.

>> No.6391476

>>6391472
Mutated ovaries, PCOS, and acne.
Bam.

>> No.6391482

Woooohooooo, orgies!

>> No.6391484

>>6391482
Ew, no.
The only people who would participate...
I'm not going to take part in an orgy with uggos and people with nasty diseases and infections.

>> No.6391485

>>6391476
Still not common enough, not to mention I don't see women offering to give free acne medication to men who suffer from it far more severely. So crossing that one out, it's fairly obvious the only reason 99% of women want free birth control is so they can feel the pleasure of being cummed inside.

Most women wouldn't support free male contraceptives.

>> No.6391488

>>6391485
I do.
Smarter to unload a gun than to shoot at a bulletproof vest.

>> No.6391490

>>6391485
>Most women wouldn't support free male contraceptives.
Do we even have this yet? I'm pretty sure nobody's made a male contraceptive pill, though I wish they fucking would. It would be a great way to cut down on paternity fraud and child entrapment bullshit.

>> No.6391493

>ITT: TROLLS.
>TROLLS EVERYWHERE.

>> No.6391494

>>6391472
Not to mention dysmenorrhea (above), ovarian cysts, pelvic inflammatory disease, irregular or overly-strong periods, prevention of certain cancers. I'm not saying they should necessarily be free-to-everyone, but certainly covered under basic insurance plans, given that they're cheap and treat a truckload of female-specific diseases and issues in addition to the risk of pregnancy.

>> No.6391496

>>6391490
They do have one but men don't like it for some reason.

>> No.6391497

>>6391485

Do you have any proof behind that statistic? I'm absolutely in favor of male contraceptives.

>> No.6391498

>>6391490
We don't and we won't because women want to keep entrapping men.

> cut down on paternity fraud

Paternity fraud won't go away until paternity testing is mandatory and women will DIE before that happens.

>> No.6391504

>>6391496
Not from what I can see. So far it's still in development, and the current male contraceptive is essentially an injection to make you temporarily sterile. Nowhere near the convenience, accessibility, or production potential that a contraceptive pill has.

>> No.6391509

>>6391490
I know there's a contraceptive in stage III trials in India that involves a polymer injected into the ductus deferens, but I don't think anyone's created a pill for men yet.

>> No.6391518

>>6391490
>>6391498
We do.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/48689501/ns/health-mens_health/t/new-cancer-drug-affects-sperm-study-sho
ws-finally-male-birth-control-pill/

>> No.6391519

>>6391496
Typical of the pathetic 'modern man'. Can't do anything for himself, even take a pill. How vile.

>>6391497
To be honest, I would support men getting something like the contraceptive injection, but I sure as fuck wouldn't trust them to take the pill. Men are irresponsible cunts, who knows when one's gonna go 'hurr I feel like cumming inside'? They put their dicks before everything.

>> No.6391520

>>6391504
I REALLY hope they make some advances on this. I mean, the combination of condoms and female BC are pretty effective, but given that condoms can break and some women can't take BC, it would be useful to have another method. There's still wayyyy to many unintended pregnancies in this world.

>> No.6391522 [DELETED] 

>>6391490
it's called a condom, dumbass

>> No.6391524

>>6391520
*ahem*
see >>6391518

>> No.6391526

>>6391524
Sorry, I was typing as that was posted! Just saw it!

>> No.6391532

>>6391522
>it's called a condom, dumbass
>>6391490
>male contraceptive pill

>comdom
>pill

I think you're using it wrong.

>> No.6391543

>>6391519
>who knows when one's gonna go 'hurr I feel like cumming inside'?

...The point of a pill would be so that they could cum inside.

>> No.6391548

>>6391459
Exactly. You hit it on the nose. I'm so jealous that welfare is so over-sufficient that people can afford luxury items as well as basic necessities, instead of welfare being insufficient in many cases to simply feed and clothe people.

>/sarcasm

>> No.6391556

>>6391455
I wasn't the person you were arguing with, and saying that it's the only foolproof way is like claiming the only foolproof way to avoid getting hit by lightning is to live indoors your entire life in a suit made of tires.

It might be true, but that doesn't make it any less retarded or unrealistic. In the realm of how people actually behave, the combined method is far superior to either option, and is superior to just relying on abstinence (Which people stop being shortly after being told about it because it's indoor-tire-suit retarded)

>> No.6391562

>>6391488
Hear hear.

There's some spongy male contraceptive thingy that basically uses a spermicidal foam inside the vas deferens. Needs to be surgically injected, but is good for 10+ years and reversible with another injection. Only issue is the "terrible" side effects, which incidentally read exactly like the side effect list for the pill or nuva ring.

>> No.6391567
File: 62 KB, 400x222, 29800749.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6391567

>>6391543

>> No.6391580

>>6391562
So basically men are being wimps about side affects we have to deal with all the time.

Okay then.

>> No.6391582

>>6391580
The side effects are kidney and liver failure.

And those are just the common ones.

>> No.6391590

>>6391556
Except that not having sex is a completely realistic concept.

Its fine if you choose to do it, as long as you acknowledge the consequences of the action. If you want to guarantee you will not face those consequences you don't do it. If this was a topic other than fucking no one would be arguing with the logic.

>> No.6391600

>>6391590
Well, I'm pretty sure a lot of people bitch that they should be able to eat unhealthy food and never exercise, but not be fat. So that's kind of similar.

Incidentally, most of the people I've seen take that angle happen to also be women. Though I'm sure I'll be called sexist for pointing that out.

>> No.6391606

>>6391582
My birth control carries side effects such as blood clots, strokes, heart attacks and deep vein thrombosis among other things. If I didn't have to take it for PCOS, I wouldn't.

>> No.6391615

>>6391606
If those side effects were actually common over half the country over 16 wouldn't be on it if they didn't need it.

Unless women prefer going bareback to living.

>> No.6391625

>>6391600
I don't think that's sexist. I just think women have to deal with the consequences in a way men don't, so they're more afraid of pregnancy. Worst case for a man is child support, worst case for a woman is cesareans followed by a lifetime of childcare.

Not to mention the fact that men can sleep around and not be called slutty for it. Women have to deal with social repercussions. A teen girl with a baby belly is (usually) seen as appalling. A teen boy who knocks up that girl is just seen as being in the wrong place at the wrong time. That's why this is seen as a women's issue. That's why women care more. They get knocked up and a medical procedure is mandatory, whether it be abortion or birth. Men can knock up a slew up women and never even know it happened.

I think condoms and birth control should be covered by insurance for the same reason my anti-psychotics are, everyone's sanity.

>> No.6391636

>>6391606
You have PCOS, too?
...Does it really help enough to risk all that?

>> No.6391633

Call me when there is a candidate that offers free ovary removal, my grandma lived 65 years without hers why should I have to keep mine?

>> No.6391637

>>6391625
>Not to mention the fact that men can sleep around and not be called slutty for it.

It's balanced out by women being able to be virgins and not be called pathetic for it.

>> No.6391650

>>6391590
Let me rephrase this so you can see how batshit this is:

Imagine instead of fucking, it was never eating meat. Meat has parasites, and you can get infections from it. Sure, properly prepared the chances of this are ridiculously negligible, but by eating meat you're implicitly accepting the possibilities of parasites and to then later complain you got a tapeworm from eating a fully prepared and cooked steak is irresponsible because you should have known the risks of eating meat, even very well prepared meat.

Some people are vegetarians, but being told in schools "vegetarianism is always better than eating meat" is damned stupid (Ethical treatment of fuzzy things and the other meat-related issues aside, of course)

Plus, don't you dare take medicine to flush out an unwanted tapeworm. It's a Gift from God, and you should be thankful for it.

>> No.6391649

>>6391615
It doubles to triples your risk of blood clots, apparently. I don't know how risky the male birth control would be as it stands as a first generation medication, but if people were seriously interested in it, you know they'd work on managing those risk levels.

>> No.6391653

>>6391637
I really don't think it is, the virgin thing is nowhere near as widespread. You don't get groups like the LAD Bible run by women to shame virgins, because, well, we just don't do that. Just face it, men are far, far worse for this shit than women are.

>> No.6391655

>>6391637

No it isn't. You could have picked something that actually matters, like the trivialization of men getting raped, but you went with that. 0/10

Also.

>cosplay & lolita

>> No.6391662

>>6391650

You. You are amazing.
Thank you.

>> No.6391657

>>6391653
Oh, and also- I see men shame other men for being sexually inexperienced far more often than I see women do it. Maybe you should fix your culture of treating sex like a trophy before you try to blame women for your problems.

>> No.6391658

>>6391636
It helped me be able to get out of bed during my period, get my periods regular, eliminate my hormonal migraines, stop my mood swings, reduce coarse hair and lose about 20lbs. I'd say it was worth it.

>> No.6391665

so since bc is freely available, it is entirely the womans fault if she gets pregnant now right?

so no child support for accidental babies for men

fuck yes

>> No.6391674

>>6391665
This is something we really need to work on.

>> No.6391676

>>6391658
That does sound tempting.
I went on a diet and lost some weight to help with mine (wasn't much over my weight but enough to make the PCOS worse). It's reduced some symptoms like the pain during periods and mood swings, but I'm still pretty irregular and I get those migraines as well.

>> No.6391687

>>6391676
Might be worth checking with a doctor and seeing if you're a candidate. I know it didn't take too long at all for me to see a difference, so you could always trial it for a small bit and see if it works for you. I just keep healthy and get regular checkups at my gyno (she's a PCOS specialist) to ward off the side effects.

>> No.6391688

>>6391653
> You don't get groups like the LAD Bible run by women to shame virgins, because, well, we just don't do that

Because women have one big group that loves shaming male virgins and it's called modern society.

>Just face it, men are far, far worse for this shit than women are.

The majority of slut and virgin shaming is done by women. There's a study that shows women are more apprehensive of peers who have more or less sex than them than men are, let me find it.

>>6391655
I'm providing the logical counter of her complaint.

>>6391657
Because it's easy to see virgin shaming when it's overt. Most of women's virgin-shaming isn't.

>> No.6391690

At fucking last. America is so backwards when it comes to healthcare

>> No.6391702

At least this means Pixyteri will finally be able to pay for her hospital visits, with all that free health care.

>> No.6391716

>>6391650
That's a really shitty analogy, especially since the dawn of man humans have avoided eating certain things specifically to avoid ailments.

Deal with it, the only way to never get pregnant is to never have sex. Case closed.

>> No.6391728

>>6391328
I am circumcised and they messed up, and now I can't orgasm. The consequence is that I remain all frustrated and horny all the time, but unable to release my stress with masturbation, and sex only calms me a little. My last girlfriend broke up with me partly because I couldn't cum during sex, and my condition has made me somewhat desperate in meeting new women. It has become increasingly hard to concentrate on work or my hobbies and psychiatrists have only offered me highly addictive and potentially harmful drugs, which I have turned down.

Nevermind your anecdotal fallacy, but now you've heard from one, so yeah, fuck circumcision.

>> No.6391730

>>6391688
Lol, whatever, you're just mad because you're a virgin.

How can you expect me to treat your arguments seriously, when your arguments only exist because you can't get laid?

>> No.6391736

>>6391090
Don't care about americas stupid backwards thinking and i have to agree: Dragon age 2 sucked balls

>> No.6391739

>>6391730
>when your arguments only exist because you can't get laid?

Just like how the only women who care about slut-shaming are the ones who suck cock in the club bathroom?

>> No.6391745

>>6391650
>equating the life of a human that you're responsible for to that of a parasite/tapeworm

And there goes all that talk about women being the 'empathic' gender.

Do you even feel?

>> No.6391751

>>6391728
Shit son. That truly sucks. Were you circumcised as a baby?

>> No.6391754

Does anyone who thinks that women legitimately get "free birth control from the government" explain exactly how that works? I'd be interested to know, because from what I understand, the government doesn't pay for shit in that regard.

>> No.6391761

>>6391751
Yes. I didn't think anything weird of it until I told my friends in college that I had never sucessfully masturbated and until my girlfriend was disapppointed that I couldn't "enjoy sex". They didn't seem to get that I just couldn't cum or orgasm.

>> No.6391782

>>6391728
>psychiatrists
have you talked to an actual physician? this is a physical problem, not a mental one.

i mean the frustration is mental, but it's stemmed from a physical ailment.

>> No.6391785

>>6391716
>Case closed

Damn. You got me. Plus, the best way to save lives would be for everyone to lay down arms and cooperate in peace, with rainbows and small animals frolicking to the sound of harp music.

Meanwhile, in the real world everyone is laughing at you and actually figuring out effective solutions to problems instead of wishful thinking.

>> No.6391792

>>6391785
I like how you only pick fights that you can win. The Great Anita would be proud of you.

>> No.6391793

>>6391754
If we're talking America, Obama mandated that all employers that provide insurance are required to have a plan that covers the cost of contraceptives. its not free, your employer (or the taxpayer in the case of gov. Provided care) is footing the bill. Its go into end up going to the supreme court because religiously afflilated companies (private schools, hospitals, charities) are jot exempt and therefore the mandate infringes on the religious freedom of the employer to choose not to pay for coverage of contraceptives. There as an ass backwards "compromise" but it doesn't really change anything.

Honestly, thanks to Obama are in general a lot of companies are just go into stop paying for employee healthcare and pay the fine. Either to ensure their religious freedom or because it's cheaper and less hassle.

>> No.6391801

>>6391745
Do you even assume gender?

The empathy is a chemical reaction induced by the fetus to help prevent the mother's urge to crush or abandon the thing when it becomes a burden. Biologically the fetus/mother relationship is akin to a chemical arms race to dominate the other. The fetus wins, but does so with side effects like morning sickness.

>> No.6391804

>>6391785

The fact that you can't even fathom not having sex is really sad. I'm sorry your life is controlled by your genitalia

>> No.6391809

>>6391792
>Pick fights you can win

Like pointing out how abstinence and complete worldwide peace were equally stupid as comprehensive and realistic methods for resolving a problem?

Seriously, they work to completely prevent pregnancy and solve world peace. But it's like solving a "Find the X" problem by circling 'X' instead of finding the result that is actually applicable and relevant.

>> No.6391814

>>6391804
I can fathom not having sex. Some people can not have sex. But you're assuming that everyone can and will absolve from sex.

Look at teenage birth rates in US states that teach abstinence-only education comparedto those who give comprehensive sex education and tell me again how wonderfully effective this method is in the real world.

>> No.6391818

>>6391782
I have consulted psychiatrists that have offered medicines for the side effects of sexual frustration. The physical aspect of this is that many of the nerve endings in my dick were damaged, which compounded over 20 years of an inability to fully enjoy fucking or masturbating which has even further deadened the orgasm responses in my body, for which there is no cure or safe treatment.

>>6391804
There are relevant physical side effects associated with sexual frustration justified by reproductive biology and neuroscience, especially in men, read above.

>> No.6391826

>>6391716
>expecting people to not have sex

get over this dumbass idea that hurrr if u dont want babby DONT HAVE SEX. Thank you Captain Obvious, we fucking know. However it's naive and maybe even barbaric at this point to think that nobody is going to fuck regardless; we're animals, it's in human nature. Adults with restraint are not the only people that have the ability to copulate. Retards and teenagers can breed too. It's statistically proven that abstinence education simply is not effective. Would you rather your tax dollars go to Juan's sixth welfare baby or towards you being able to afford proper education and affordable birth control for your promiscuous teenage daughter? It's also quite stupid of you to believe that birth control is used solely as a preventative measure against children... there are plenty of women that can attest to using the pill as a way to alleviate debilitating symptoms and ailments. Would it change anything if we changed the word "birth control pill" to "womb and hormonal regulator?" FUCK IM PIST

>> No.6391836

>>6391716
Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs

Learn it. Know it. Accept it.

>> No.6391837

>>6391793
But birth control is considered a medication and also part of preventative care. I know many people who take it and don't use it just so they can bang a new dude every night. I agree that forcing religious institutions to cover it lingers on the edge of not right, but if the company/organization/what have you has an obligation to keep their members/employees/students/affiliates safe and they need that according to a doctor, I don't understand why their insurance shouldn't cover it.

>> No.6391848

>>6391836
If sex is a need then men are entitled to sex.

>> No.6391866

Paying $100 a year for a woman to have birth control and prevent pregnancy, or paying a shitload more for her to have WIC and foodstamps and government assistance because she has kids?

No, it doesn't make it right for anybody to have unprotected, casual sex. But if the government's going to help them not have kids, I say go for it.

>> No.6391867

Why do so many people act like people not getting STDs or having unwanted pregnancies is such a bad thing? God damn, I hate moralfags.

>> No.6391864
File: 67 KB, 550x550, 1287885461850[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6391864

>>6391848
Sex should be a commodity as free as food or clothing, knowing how manipulative women are, less women would be inclined to date and more would charge for their goods if prositution was legalized.

>> No.6391870

>>6391867
Because birth control doesn't protect against STDs?

>> No.6391874

>>6391814
Everyone CAN. They choose not to. Unless we are talking about rape, which effects maybe 1% of people, you have the ability to not have sex.

>> No.6391875

>>6391333
>implying it looks better
ugly, dry, scarred, mutilated dicks aren't my thing
thank the Lord I don't live in shithole America.

>> No.6391879

>>6391875

I don't know what the fuck your doctors are doing wherever you are, but I assure you, circumcised dicks don't look mutilated.

>> No.6391889

>>6391879
>but I assure you, circumcised dicks don't look mutilated.

Women across the world disagree.

>> No.6391890

>>6391336
>The government certainly shouldn't be funding it.

It's so much better for our economy to have more unwanted children, instead of helping spread access to birth control.

>> No.6391891

>>6391809
No, I'm pointing out that you responded to that thrash post instead of mine where I pointed out that you just called human life you were responsible for a tapeworm / parasite.

You're a disgusting degenerate.

>> No.6391896

>>6391836
I don't remember it having 'the need for sex' anywhere as a requirement for the higher needs.

Have they created a slut version of the original in America?

>> No.6391905

Let's face it guys - it won't last long. The whores' decadent lifestyle driven by the demagogy of feminism will fall apart as soon as the mighty Chinese dragon invades Kwa to teach them their place.

Then they will become obedient bitches willing to suck any dick for $dolla$.

sauce: Me being a Chinese student.

>> No.6391906

>>6391304
>legislates that women should get free birth control
Yes. Free birth control=less poor people multiplying. This is a very, very good thing.
>continues to allow women to avoid responsibility for getting pregnant while still forcing men to accept it
This is just so idiotic, I'm not even respondong.
>legislates pay equality laws based on a pay gap that doesn't actually exist
.... except that it DOES.
>can't bother to ban circumcision in the US
Studies show that uncut cocks are signifigantly more likely to get diseased. Plus, it does not hurt the quality of life of a man who had one in any way.

>> No.6391911

>>6391889
Every girl I know, myself included, strongly prefers cut.

>> No.6391913

>>6391866
This.

>> No.6391916

>>6391906
>This is a very, very good thing.
For privileged right wingers like you, perhaps.

>> No.6391920

>>6391906
You're trying really, really hard to be a bad troll, aren't you?

>>>/r9k/

>> No.6391928

>>6391911
>I have never fucked an uncut man

>> No.6391930

>>6391911
American?

I prefer uncut myself, it looks better and they seem to have better orgasms (I'm American too but my bf is uncut, I suppose he's a bit unusual for the US).

>> No.6391931

/pol/ go away.

>> No.6391932

>>6391911
>cutfag virgin detected
The majority of the world's doctors agree that it is an incredibly retarded practice.

Of course, yours will say differently, since they need their jewgold, and of course, you will hear studies coming from your country that it's the best thing ever, and, of course, you will have people like you pretending to be women to say they love it.

Do you even know why they started cutting your dicks, Ameriturd?

Some guy who owned a cereal company didn't want people to masturbate. He thought that boys start fapping because the skin is itchy, and it's more likely to be itchy from bad hygiene of the penis foreskin.

Do you get it now? They cut your dick because some prude did not want you to fap.

>> No.6391940

>>6391930
This.

Cut men basically don't enjoy sex at all. Why would I want to fuck someone who isn't enjoying it?

>> No.6391943

>>6391940

>Cut men basically don't enjoy sex at all.

lolwut

>> No.6391946

>>6391932
>... it supposedly reduced the secretions that would get inflamed around the foreskin and thus get young boys in the habit of rubbing themselves. Seriously, books at the time treat genital itching as a gateway drug to masturbation -- a 1914 public school sex ed manual says keeping kids from scratching their junk is the only way to keep them out of the insane asylum, where all masturbators end up.

>Anti-masturbation crusader John Harvey Kellogg then came along and upped the ante by insisting that circumcision should be performed with no anesthesia. Why? So the kid would feel the pain and remember it the next time he was tempted to "self-abuse":

>"The operation should be performed by a surgeon without administering an anesthetic, as the brief pain attending the operation will have a salutary effect upon the mind, especially if it be connected with the idea of punishment, as it may well be in some cases. The soreness which continues for several weeks interrupts the practice, and if it had not previously become too firmly fixed, it may be forgotten and not resumed."

>> No.6391951

Cut is easier for blowjobs, uncut is easier for handjobs. I've had both, don't really mind either.

>> No.6391954

And at the same time that they are hating on birth control men start bitching if the government even TRIES to touch their Viagra and complain about having to support a child after convincing their gf to go bareback.

It's truly like we are talking to a bunch of uninformed apes.

>> No.6391952

>>6391940
this is asinine. while uncut men are unarguably more sensitive cut men can still enjoy sex.

i prefer an uncut dick myself, but i'm not going to turn someone away or /mock/ someone because their parents made a choice for them that they weren't even aware was made until much later in life.

>> No.6391955

>>6391745
I had some intestinal worms for a while. I didn't kill them because I liked the idea that I was a complete ecosystem for a brood of creatures; they were born, ate, fucked, and died inside of me. I was like God. Eventually they just went away but it was interesting.

>> No.6391957

>>6391952
If you don't mock them, then they will cut off their kid's dick too.

Whenever I see a cutfag, I point at them and laugh.

>> No.6391958

>>6391954
Mangina-chan pls.

>> No.6391960

>>6391943
It's true. Cut men have a hard time cumming and don't feel any pleasure.

Plus they dry out the woman's vagina and make sex bad for her. Really, there's zero reason a woman should prefer cut.

>>6391951
.Cut is easier for blowjobs

Except you can just lick the frenulum and play the with foreskin to make it more entertaining for you. It's way easier to get an uncut guy off through a blowjob than a cut guy. Most can't even get off.

>> No.6391962

>>6391940
But we do enjoy sex. You're stupid for saying this.

>> No.6391963

>>6391818
prostate stimulation bro, get your gf to peg you

>> No.6391966

>>6391960
so? what do I care if the guy gets off or not, the longer he stays hard the better

>> No.6391964

>>6391957
nope, i would never date someone who would cut their future offspring. it's something i bring up quite quickly in relationships because i don't think that it's a choice the parents should make.

same for piercing ears.

my kid wants pierced ears? i will wait until they ask for it, i will not bring it up (but i doubt it'll take long for them to ask for it with my 20+ ear piercings).
my son wants a cut dick? he can get one when he's 18 and pays for it himself. i am not going to be responsible for an irreversible medial procedure with no medical benefit.

>> No.6391968

>>6391960
>lick the frenulum

Best thing ever!

>> No.6391970

>>6391966
It doesn't matter how long he's hard if he's drying out your vagina with his mutilated penis.

Anyway, the fact that you only care about your pleasure is pretty selfish. But I guess most women are that way.

>> No.6391971

>>6391964
I love you so much right now

>> No.6391972

>>6391960
You have to be trolling or have no sexual experience because almost everything you just said is 100% false. I have never been with a cut guy, nor known one that didn't thoroughly enjoy sex, nor have I ever had any problems making them cum from blowjobs or them drying out my vagina.

>> No.6391973

ITT:
>misogynist neckbeard virgins / pretending to be girls
(=people who don't agree with me)

>cool people
(=people who agree with me)

>> No.6391974

>>6391960
>most can't even get off

where the fuck are you all pulling this from? it's obviously not true.
this is part of the reason people don't take the uncut argument seriously, because you make shit up to get a leg up. but all cut men know it's bullshit so they don't give a fuck and will continue to cut their children.

use real arguments, from doctors saying there is no benefit, from the anon who is one of the rare cases of a cutting gone wrong. don't say
>most cut men can't cum

>> No.6391975

>>6391970
More men are like that than women. Just sayin'.

Seriously, none of the guys I've been with have ever given a rats ass if I came or not. Sweet guys, too, otherwise.

>> No.6391976

>>6391970
"ooh look at me, I'm a special snowflake not like all the other girls"

if you were hot and desirable enough you wouldn't have to do such demeaning and dehumanizing things as sucking a man's cock

>> No.6391977

>>6391971
body modification is like one of my main passions, cutting a penis is body modification so i'm passionate about it.
-shrugs-

>> No.6391978

>>6391964
THAT'S the first thing you bring up? no wonder everyone thinks you're apeshit crazy and your last boy/girlfriend beat you

>> No.6391981

>>6391911
because you live in shithole America and thus have been conditioned to think that scarred dicks are a normal thing to have.

>> No.6391982

>>6391964
You know that your kid will have a much higher chance of getting an STD, right? Also, he's a more likely candidate for certain kinds of cancer.

The anti-circumcision crowd seems to overlook these facts a lot.

>> No.6391983

>>6391978
>first thing
no, i said it's something i bring up quickly in a relationship.
meaning, once i'm already dating them. meaning, once it's already serious. meaning, when i am figuring out if we would have a life together or not.

sage because you're trolling

>> No.6391985

>>6391982
link to source? i have never come across this, but am more than open to reading more information.

from what i have learned through my studies on the fact it's a completely useless procedure.

>> No.6391987

>>6391890
Its cute that you think the government forcing employers to pay for contraceptives is going to drastically reduce the number of unwanted pregnancy.

First of all, there was already access to free contraceptives. Many schools, sex ed programs, pp ECT hand out free condoms. The ting is birth control only works if you use it. Making it "free from the government" isn't going to cause every woman to use it.

Second of all, you seem to be under the impression that people living off the government want to escape their dependency. I know poor asd idiots that have purposfully gotten pregnant with the express purpose of being able to collect more money from the government.

All the contraceptive mandate does is infringe on the rights of people so that women can get free shit.

>> No.6391990

>>6391946
he also liked penile infibulation aka sewing up niggas foreskins with wire

>> No.6391991

>>6391985
it is useless. you're being trolled

>> No.6391993

>>6391982

Riiiiight.

>> No.6391995

>>6391985
http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/malecircumcision/

From the official Center of Disease Control website.

>> No.6391996

>>6391982
well why don't you get your eyes gouged out because you might get conjunctivitis or eye cancer you fucking cunt

>> No.6391998

>>6391991
i'll give them the benefit of the doubt. i like to hear both sides of an argument before i pick a side- and i'm always open to rethink my view if the evidence against my stance is substantial.

>>6391987
it's not that people think it will get better now- because nothing changed. it's just going to stay the same. it's that it wont get worse.

like, where my mom works (and i'm on her insurance) they wouldn't have taken away birth control as apart of the insurance plan. but for millions of americans they would have, they would have had to pay out of pocket for birth control or get privet insurance. and a lot of people can't afford that.

on top of that, Planned Parenthood would have gotten it's funding cut drastically, meaning there's no knowing if people could have continued to get free birth control from them anymore.

>> No.6391999

free bc?

fuck yes i'm ready

are there other types of bc that stall your period for more than 3 months that don't dissolve your bones? i heard that one shot stops it for a year but it eats away your density or something

>> No.6392003

>>6391999

Honestly anything that would do that is probably bad for you in some other way anyhow.

>> No.6392004

>>6391985
The reason people act like it's a useless procedure is because that was a recent side-effect no one even knew about until very recently. Ironically, the only good reason to get your kid circumcised is the one least taken into account by parents.

>> No.6392007

>>6391995
first paragraph says "well maybe but we're not sure if it actually does this"
>Some laboratory studies have shown the foreskin is more susceptible to HIV infection than other penile tissue, although others have failed to show any difference in the ability of HIV to penetrate inner compared with outer foreskin surface

i'm sorry, but inconclusive evidence is not going to sway my opinion.

>> No.6392010

itt:
mad cutfags

Note how cutfags are always the one who are mad - since there's no turning back for them. Whereas uncut guys just laugh at them - they still have the choice - but why would they take a procedure that makes them obv. inferior?

>> No.6392011

>>6392003
the one i'm taking now already risks blood clots and strokes and shit, standard bc warnings with less bleeding

i despise periods so much that i'm willing to risk blood clots but not quite willing enough to lose my skeleton

there had to be a middle ground somewhere between 3 and 12

>> No.6392012

>>6391995
Holy fucking shit. I think my opinion on this did a 180. I thought it was just a stupid religious thing.

>> No.6392013

>>6391995
Er, yeah... no.. That is not evidence. That's some Jew troll trying to justify the procedure with made up scare tactics.

>> No.6392014

>>6392010

0/10

>> No.6392018

>>6392014
Yep, that's how you fared on the scale of "how not-mad I am?".

>> No.6392020

>>6391982
I feel like this is because circumcised dicks are quite dry with all the mucous membranes cut off so don't harbor pathogens as well. dunno but.
Even so, that isn't a particularly valid reason. Forskins have been selected for over millions of years, they obviously have some benefit over not having one.

>> No.6392023

>>6392012
>tfw I am a sheep

>> No.6392024

I feel like this is probably somewhere near babies getting their ear pierced. Circumcision is a body modification and the person receiving it should be able to consent, just like any other mod.

>> No.6392026

>>6392024
i agree tbh

seeing babies with pierced ears makes me sad and thinking about babies being circumcised also makes me sad

>> No.6392046

>>6391996
But you NEED your eyes. I don't have hard opinions on this issue, but does the foreskin serve any really important purpose?

>> No.6392053
File: 20 KB, 460x288, the girl with the dragon tattoo.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6392053

ITT:

Women who Hate Men.

>> No.6392056

>>6392046
Also, just FYI, I am reading about it now.

>> No.6392057

>>6392046
As a man, not really.
It's just a flap of skin.

>> No.6392060
File: 1.22 MB, 2560x1712, You've got to be squidding.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6392060

Hey guys, what's going on in this thr-
>pic related

>> No.6392080

>>6392046
>>6392057

It's kinda like wisdom teeth.
I don't see anybody bitching about getting their wisdom teeth removed.

>> No.6392101

>>6392080
having wisdom teeth is an actual problem for a lot of people. they can cause tooth pain, jaw pain, headache, migraines, impaction, infection, shift your teeth. a lot of issues.

if you don't need your wisdom teeth removed you don't get them removed. my mom didn't have hers removed.
i mean of course you can still get them removed if you want, since they have no reason to be there and the risk of having them come in incorrectly is usually higher than the chance that they wont move at all.

>> No.6392129
File: 88 KB, 763x812, 1349201695621.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6392129

if you are circumcised-men that plan to circumcise your boys at birth, I urge you to reconsider. I has uncircumcised penis and my life is fine. You only want to circumcise your babies because of Stockholm syndrome. Also, saying that the foreskins are useless is wrong. They have like thousand of nerve endings in them.

>> No.6392139

>>6392101
>having is foreskin is an actual problem for a lot of people. They can cause pain, phimosis, infection, strong foul odor, a lot of issues.

>If you don't need your foreskin removed you don't get it removed. My dad didn't have his removed.
>I mean of course you can get it removed if you want, since it has no reason to be there, and would greatly reduce the risk of having an infection.

Stop talking about penis health if you don't have a penis. Thanks.

>> No.6392140

>>6391665
>this post
>entirely ignored

well women?

>> No.6392144

>>6392139
lmfao

>> No.6392143

>>6392057
>>6392046
the foreskin, off the top of my head, acts most obviously as a protecting layer for the BENIS, keeping it moist and away from pathogens and abrasive things, and there is the benefit of nerve endings to heighten sexual pleasure. It also feels better to women (some say.) I'm not exactly sure if this is true or not, but the foreskin has glands that release enzymes that are anti-bacterial, also that there is some evidence for pheromone glands or something being present. There hasn't, been much study into the foreskin I don't think, which maybe could be to do with the fact doctors and cosmetics companies profit from people getting them cut off, like how not much study is done about deep-sea zoology because the people that are around these creatures the most are undersea oil companies that don't want environmental conservation restrictions on them so they just keep quiet about all the weird shit down there.
TL:DR: the foreskin is far from a vestigial organ.

>> No.6392146

>>6392129
Iunno bro, I got my foreskin removed pretty late in life (late teens). I think my dick looks more kawaii without it.

>> No.6392149

>>6392139
that's dumb. I think humans should be able to talk about the health of other humans. Like saying that there should be no male gynecologists.

>> No.6392150

>>6392129
>Stockholm Syndrome

That word, I do not think it means what you think it means.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stockholm_syndrome

>They have like thousand of nerve endings in them.

So? Having nerve endings doesn't mean it's useful. The human body has like, a dozen vestigial organs and parts that are effectively, completely useless. The head itself it just as sensitive if not more so.

>> No.6392152

>>6392046
>but does the foreskin serve any really important purpose?

The foreskin is the most sensitive part of the penis. It also keeps everything lubricated so it doesn't dry out and become disgusting like cutfag cocks. Also circumcised men are more likely to develop ED.

If you care about good sex and male pleasure it is very fucking important. I guess the reason so many mothers do it is because they don't care.

>>6392139
The difference is that problems with foreskin can be dealt with without cutting it off while you can't fix most problems with the wisdom teeth.

>> No.6392153

>>6392140
if a man chooses to have sex he is still partaking in the risk. it's the same with a condom. "b-but it was on HIS dick!" you still put it inside and knew it wasn't fool-proof so ya that is some flawed logic

>> No.6392157

>>6392046
men are born with foreskin why would it not be meant to be there?

>> No.6392158

>>6392150
what vestigial organs do you have in mind? because many of these actually do have some function, see: appendix.
But in any case, your point is dumb because the foreskin is not a vestigial organ.

>> No.6392160

>>6392149
>male gynecologists

That's completely different. Those men have studied and trained for years to understand as much as currently humanly possible about their field.

Unless you're likewise trained, shut the fuck up.

>> No.6392161

my god, what the fuck?. i'm not usual resident of /cgl/. I'm only a visitor from /v/.

Please tell me not all men of /cgl/ are like these faggot circumcised men.

Herp derp, I don't care what normal people feel like. I am going to gouge my babies eye out because I believe I am normal. Yeah take that normal fag, who need eye. I'm just the same as them without eyes.

>> No.6392162

>>6391665
No, you misogynistic fuck. It's still the man's fault, he shouldn't have cummed knowing that his gf wasn't on bc.

And if it wasn't his gf he was fucking then he's a fucking rapist filth.

Why are all men incapable of taking responsibility for their actions?

>> No.6392170

>>6392150
>The head itself it just as sensitive if not more so.

Except circumcised men's glans dry up and become keratinized because so they lose a shitton of sensitivity (the difference between tickling your palm and tickling your elbow, basically)

>> No.6392173

>>6392157
i dunno maybe it served some tribal sheath purpose when we were unclothed primates? same thing with wisdom teeth and the muscles behind your ears and tonsils.

>> No.6392169

>>6392152
>dry out and become disgusting like cutfag cocks

Something tells me you've never seen a circumcised penis that didn't belong to an old man.

>> No.6392176

>>6392161
>Herp derp, I don't care what normal people feel like. I am going to gouge my babies eye out because I believe I am normal. Yeah take that normal fag, who need eye. I'm just the same as them without eyes.

That analogy is so ludicrous I don't know why I'm even bothering. The Eye is an essential sensory organ.
The foreskin is a flap of skin that *might* come with some perks, but otherwise it's perfectly feasible to live a normal life without.

> visitor from /v/
Well that explains why you're such a retard then.

>> No.6392179

>>6392150
I understand what stockholm syndrome is. Thank you, you pretentious fuck.

You were molested/abused as a child so know you want to do it to your children. Yes, you are behaving exactly like molested pedophile.

About nerve endings, how do you know it's not useful? Your 5th toes are also useless why dont you just cut it then? Most stupid argument ever.

>> No.6392182

>>6392170

You actually believe that shit? lol

Try again faggot.

>> No.6392186

I'll just ignore all these crazy dudes, and pose a question to the ladies:
do you prefer a circumcised or uncircumcised penis?

>> No.6392191

>>6392160
>>6392160
So all men have been to medical school and specialise in the male reproductive tract? Ok.
lel because I bet you're one of the people going "DURN WUMMIN WITH THEIR BERTH CUNTRULL AND ABEARTIONS

>> No.6392193

>>6392179
>You were molested/abused as a child so know you want to do it to your children. Yes, you are behaving exactly like molested pedophile.

Except that's not what Stockholm Syndrome is at all. Go home.

>Your 5th toes are also useless why dont you just cut it then?

The only reason people don't is because it's not prevalent in our culture. Cutting off the little toe logically wouldn't effect anything at all, so your analogy is invalid.

>> No.6392194

>>6392186
uncircumcised looks like a turtle

>> No.6392195

>>6392182
>You actually believe that shit?

This is something that's documented, dude.

>> No.6392196

>>6392176
how the fuck would you know then fucking blind cunt. How the fuck would you know when you have no fore skin?

>but...but i heard it from others.

Yeah right, how about you grow up and understand that information fed to you can be fake?

>> No.6392201

>>6392186
Uncircumcised because I actually enjoy hearing him enjoy sex.

>> No.6392202

>>6392176
JUST BECAUSE YOUR FORESKIN DOESN'T LET YOU SEE, THAT DOESN'T MEAN THAT IT IS ALRIGHT OR SANE TO CUT IT OFF OF NEWBORN BABIES

>> No.6392206

>>6392191
>So all men have been to medical school and specialise in the male reproductive tract? Ok.

No, but considering that they live with a penis every day of their lives, they have a great deal more knowledge and experience in it's health and care than your average woman.

It's like if I used Windows my whole life, I'd be a lot more familiar with using Windows than someone who's been a Macfag their entire life.

>> No.6392210

>>6392186
Uncircumcised, definitely. I wouldn't judge a relationship on it but I prefer uncut.

>> No.6392216

>>6392202
>A FLAP OF SKIN IS TOTALLY THE SAME THING AS A VITAL ORGAN U GUIZE

>> No.6392225

>>6392193
No you pretentious fuck, that is not me talking about Stockholm syndrome.

Lol lol, so you are saying that circumcision is ok because it cultural relevant? How about we go back to cutting the clitoris then. Im sure it cultural relevant with the mudskin.

And benefits of circumcision are not clear as day. It's shady at best. So stop saying treating it more than barbaric ritual.

>> No.6392228

>>6392201
Well, I wouldn't say it quite like that. Although when you tease your guy's frenulum with the tip of your tongue and look at his face - THAT is pleasure!

>> No.6392222

>>6392196
>Implying I have no foreskin

This thing sucks. The only reason I'm not rid of it yet is because I'm a poorfag.

>> No.6392230

>>6392216
Tell me where I said that?
>implying the foreskin is "just a flap of skin"
even if it fucking was, why the fuck would you cut it off. Oh wait because you're worthless plebians buying (literally) into a religious myth.

>> No.6392239

>>6392196
oh ho ho, you just don't understand it do you? Now tell me, since you are uncircumcised how do you know that your life will be the same?

>> No.6392233

>>6392228
>Well, I wouldn't say it quite like that.

You don't need to put it nicely. Making sure cutfags actually understand how women hate their mutilated cocks will make them less likely to repeat their parent's mistake.

>> No.6392235

>>6392216
You're an idiot

>> No.6392243

>>6392222
Just a brotip, make sure you schedule lots of recovery time so you can stay inside your house naked. Putting on clothes after the operation hurts pretty bad.

>> No.6392247

But there is no free government birth control. The law only makes it so that health insurance companies are forced to cover it.

>Americans in charge of understanding their own laws

>> No.6392253

>>6392233
I do frown upon the procedure, yeah. But I can't really get too mad at guys that didn't have a choice. I agree that I hope they won't continue the practice though

>> No.6392254

>>6392239
woop I quoting myself, meant to quote this anon>>6392222

>>Implying I have no foreskin

This thing sucks. The only reason I'm not rid of it yet is because I'm a poorfag.

>> No.6392257
File: 555 KB, 215x194, 1337959609759.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6392257

>>6392225
>not me talking about Stockholm syndrome.

>quoted word for word talking about "Stockholm Syndrome" as a case of projection.

What I quoted and was replying to were YOUR EXACT WORDS concerning Stockholm Syndrome. Why you're even bothering to backpedal out of this is beyond me.

>> No.6392258

>>6392222
Is there something wrong with it anon?

>> No.6392262

>>6390794
>Yes, but your taxes won't cover all of it. I have to pay for your vagina. Why? You never pay for my dick.

WHAT IS VIAGRA

inb4 baww its used for blood problems

>> No.6392269

>>6392262
But viagra use for men is not quite as widespread, because a man who uses viagra = loser to other men, cause he can't get his dick stiff.

>> No.6392265

>>6392253
>. But I can't really get too mad at guys that didn't have a choice.

That doesn't mean you have to tolerate it. They can deal with it and go find some circumfetishist cunt to massage their broken penis.

>> No.6392267

>>6392257
No you fuck, I did not say "hey this is my definition of Stockhom syndrome". You choose to belive it. Then I clerify to clear the misunderstanding and again you imagine that I backpedal out. You pretitious fuck.

>> No.6392273

>>6392265
Why are you so mad at circumcised people? Who hurt you?

>> No.6392274

>>6392262
viagra isn't mandatorily covered by Babamacare

why aren't anabolic steroids and androgenic hormones covered? men look, feel, think and act better when they have higher levels of testosterone

>> No.6392281

>>6392243
I fucking hope the doctoc accidentally burn his dick off just like a certain unfortunate event that iam too lazy to google right now.
>>6392273
because you people want to mutilate your babies. The thought alone is making me sick.
Let him grow up uncircumcised, he can choose for himself later on.

>> No.6392277

>>6392273
I'm not mad, I'm just saying that there's nothing wrong with rejecting a man for being cut.

>> No.6392282

Free BC would benefit both men and women, yet you still argue. This is why America can't have nice things!

>> No.6392283

>>6392265
Why are you being such a cunt? It's hard to believe that you are an actual female or that you even know what you're talking a bout. It's obvious you're trying to force your opinion onto all of us rather than actually having an intelligent discussion. A circumcised penis is by no means a "broken" penis. Maybe if you weren't an angry 30 year old virgin you'd realize that.

>> No.6392291

>>6392281
>I fucking hope the doctor accidentally burn his dick off

No surgery is 100% safe. Something could very well go wrong for that poor lad.

>> No.6392290

>>6392277
would you be okay with me rejecting you because you don't have your labias cut?

>> No.6392294

>>6392274

Viagra/Cialis are already covered by insurance companies. Obama just made it so the same is true for birth control. The insurance company pays for it, not taxpayers.

>men look, feel, think and act better when they have higher levels of testosterone

Inducing an unnaturally high level of testosterone is disastrous for the body.

>> No.6392296

>>6392281
>Let him grow up uncircumcised, he can choose for himself later on.
Right, which is why I don't understand your aggression. I chose to get circumcised. And here you are telling me to burn my dick off. u wot m8?

>> No.6392297
File: 14 KB, 199x203, 1343491673134.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6392297

>>6392283
>lol lol, i have no eyes but its ok guys. I can still walk around. I'm fine really. Not broken at all.

>> No.6392301
File: 30 KB, 333x333, fgds.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6392301

if my taxes pay for your vagina management, why do i not get 24/7 access to said vagina?

>> No.6392302

>>6392269
>But viagra use for men is not quite as widespread, because a man who uses viagra = loser to other men

...what is this i dont even

You know, if you take Viagra, a sign doesn't magically appear over your head and inform other men that you are taking it. It's not exactly that hard to keep it a secret, and thus does not have any effect on sales for that reason.

Aside from that, do you even realize how many guys can't get it up once they older? not as widespread as birth control my ass

>> No.6392309

>>6392302
>Aside from that, do you even realize how many guys can't get it up once they older?

A lot of Americans, but not other countries, because they don't mutilate their men.

>> No.6392305

>>6392296
Different anon, just curious why you chose to get circumcised

>> No.6392313

>>6392273
Seriously... I mean, really, the idea of being that picky over a sexual organ seems a little absurd to me. I really can't say I have that much preference over a guys junk, so long as it isn't taking a right angle in some direction. If I find someone I love who I am comfortable enough to have sex with, I'm not going to kick him to the curb of the absence or presence of a piece of skin.

>> No.6392320

>>6392301

>>6392294
>>6392247

>> No.6392324

>>6392296
because you try to justify cutting babies dick off.

But if you didn't. Then I've been so far up my ass that I didn't realize.

>> No.6392325

>>6392294
why do you assume it would be an unnaturally high level?

>traditionally serum testosterone levels are observed to be anywhere between 300 to 1,200 ng/dL

is it fair that someone could have 4x less the test of another man and still be considered within the acceptable range?

>> No.6392328

>>6392297
Blind people can still walk around and do just about everything a 'normal' person can.

So yeah, you're still being a bigoted cunt.

>> No.6392334

>>6392305
It's hard to pinpoint an exact reason, but I guess one of the biggest factors was that I just found a cut one more aesthetically pleasing.
>>6392324
Uhhh...yeah. Thanks, I guess?

>> No.6392337

>>6392328
says the guy who want to cut babies dick off to satisfy some sand people's god.

>> No.6392341

>>6392324
Nobody want to cut a baby's dick off. Just a useless piece of skin that they won't miss anyway.

I sure as fuck never missed mine, and I've been told by several partners that I have a nice cock so you can shut right the fuck up with that "ugly and mangled" bull.

>> No.6392349

>>6392334
>I just found a cut one more aesthetically pleasing.

Cheers for the answer. That makes me feel sad though

>> No.6392353

>>6392309
>A lot of Americans, but not other countries, because they don't mutilate their men.

Viagra helps with blood flow and has nothing to do with psychological arousal or the sensation of a foreskin.

Or were you trying to imply something else and I'm just missing the point?

>> No.6392354
File: 568 KB, 130x73, 9lj53r.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6392354

>>6392337
>thinks circumcision is solely about religion, not hygiene or anything else.

>> No.6392356

>>6392297
blind people have been shown to be able to learn to echo-locate so well that they can shoot basketballs

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G1QaCeosUmw

>> No.6392357

>>6392349
No you don't. Pull you god damn skin down. There, look exactly like a cut penis. No need for blood.

>> No.6392362
File: 36 KB, 400x486, alpha-as-fuck.jpg.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6392362

>>6392320
well in that case, you can access my penis any time you want, sweet cheeks

>> No.6392365

>>6392354
it is

>> No.6392368
File: 32 KB, 500x290, Kayo Satoh - facepalm.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6392368

>>6392349
It's funny reading this thread, because it seems the majority of women feel the opposite. Ah well, whaddya gonna do?

>> No.6392369

>>6392365
There's a whole medical field that disagrees with you. But whatever.

>> No.6392371

>>6392309
lolwut

>> No.6392372

>>6392357
Well seeing as it's my dick, I think I'll do whatever I want to it. kthxbye

>> No.6392374

>>6392341
Yeah I've never missed my wing or my 6th sense or my levitation ability too. Who need to be born with those?

>> No.6392377

>>6392369
there's not

>> No.6392391

>>6392368
Yeah, it seems that way which surprises me too! As a girl I do prefer uncut and I always thought I was in the minority!
My bf had phimosis and had surgery to fix it but they did not circumcise him - which I am very happy about. I actually love how it looks and feels.

>> No.6392395
File: 1.67 MB, 393x221, Tyrionsmack.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6392395

>>6392368
Don't trust what you read "women" on the internet say. Most of them are just angry virgin boys trying to force their ideals on the rest of us anyway.

Been cut all my life, perfectly normal and healthy sex life, all my partners have loved my dick. Not claiming to be a sex god or anything, just proof (however anecdotal) that there's no reason to flip shit just because of a lack of foreskin. Your boyfriend will perform just fine without it. There is literally no difference between a cut dick and an uncut dick once they're hard.

>> No.6392405

>>6392374

What are you trying to prove here?
Levitation and a 6th sense are things that no one's ever had anyway. (unless you're one of those newage faggots that actually believes so, in which case you can fuck right off.)

You can't miss what you've never had.

>> No.6392406

>>6392395
I'm very much a woman thank you very much.
And yeah, if my boyfriend had a cut dick I would not love him any less. However, I do prefer uncut.

>> No.6392412

>>6392405
>>6392395
I'm tired with you. I really hope you let your baby boys have a chance to decide and not just circumcise them at birth. That's all.

>> No.6392432
File: 48 KB, 307x224, can we get much higher..png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6392432

so does being cut make it ugly or what

>> No.6392435

>>6392412
And maybe you shouldn't tell people how to raise their own kids? What gives you the right to think you know how to raise someone else's family for them?
Who the fuck cares anyway? There's no difference between cut and uncut once you get hard and in the sack. Anyone tells you otherwise is a lying faggot. Stop trying to wage a battle over something so pathetically stupid. Fucking armchair activist, I swear.

>> No.6392440

>>6392435
>cutting their foreskin off for no reason
>"raising your kids"
lel. Rick Santorum, plz go

>> No.6392443

>>6392435
>There's no difference between cut and uncut once you get hard and in the sack

For outright fucking there's not much difference, but there's a lot of difference when it comes to oral and hand jobs etc.

>> No.6392444
File: 17 KB, 310x206, 1315289153312.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6392444

>>6392374
>fictional abilities are totally on par with actual medical fact

>> No.6392446
File: 30 KB, 217x259, 146.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6392446

>>6392435
Beta cutfag is mad as fuck

>> No.6392447

>>6392443

No, there really isn't. Quit talking out your ass.
It's all the same shit, cutfags still have a frenelum and everything. Try again.

>> No.6392448

>>6392432
I think a lot of people think the opposite.

>> No.6392457

>>6392447
Yes, there is. I'm not talking out of my ass I'm talking from experience.

>> No.6392459
File: 772 KB, 302x172, fuck this.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6392459

>>6392443
ITT: Virgins talking about sex.

>> No.6392461

>>6392447
lol, stop being so butthurt. your parents mutilated your dick. go cry about it.

>> No.6392463
File: 202 KB, 352x374, 1301273630558.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6392463

>>6392457

You and I have had very different experiences then.

>> No.6392466

>>6392459
confirmed for butthurt cutfag

go take your dry penis elsewhere jew

>> No.6392467

>>6392461
0/10, Almost made a serious reply

>> No.6392469

>>6392447
>cutfags still have a frenelum and everything

Some do. Most don't.

>> No.6392472

>>6392447
>mfw you actually believe there is not difference for oral and handjobs
Virgin, pls stop.

>> No.6392478

>>6392467
so fucking butthurt. maybe you should be mad at your shitty parents for your dry as fuck, mutilated jew cock

>> No.6392480

>>6392472
>thinks that rubbing/sucking on a cylinder is not the same as rubbing/sucking on a cylinder

>> No.6392490
File: 1.02 MB, 682x996, 1352066456401.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6392490

>>6392480
If it's the same why do women univerally prefer suck uncut cocks?

Pic related, the 10/10 penis you'll never have because of your mutilated cylinder.

>> No.6392493

>>6392478
I thank my parents every day for perfecting my already amazing cock. That it's true glory might be shown to the world, unadulterated and pure.

Enjoy your smelly dog-cock you dirty goyim.

>> No.6392494

>>6392480
Confirmed virgin or clever troll. Literally made me laugh out loud either way
3/10!

>> No.6392496

>>6392480
>mfw you don't understand what a foreskin is and does
Virgin, pls stop.

>> No.6392498

>>6392490
Those look exactly the same as circumcised cocks. In fact, half of them probably are circumcised.

>> No.6392503

>>6392490
>Implying I want a dick in my mouth

Get out of here fag.

>> No.6392506

>>6392294
>no cost to the tax payer

You idiot. How do you think the insurance company is going to pay for all those birth control pills? They will raise the cost of the insurance. Who is going to get to pay for the increased cost? You are! There is no such thing as free from the government.

My god libs are full on retarded.

>> No.6392507
File: 132 KB, 437x241, fancy sauce.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6392507

>>6392432
is there any way that i can get feedback

>> No.6392509

I'm willing to bet the last 90 posts have been men.

>> No.6392511
File: 328 KB, 267x229, 2i1o7d4.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6392511

It's really amazing how detached 4chan is from the real world...
If you actually talked to a real person, you'd find that the vast majority don't care at all. It's all the same shit. Get over yourselves.

>> No.6392512

>>6392507
Yes.,

Being cut makes it ugly. I don't think any women prefer it aesthetically.

>> No.6392514

>>6392507
At the end of the day it doesn't matter what we think.

>> No.6392523

>>6392506
It's not going to even be noticeable. I know that you are a conservative and thus inherently anti-intellectual, but you need to understand insurance economics before you speak of it.

>> No.6392527

>>6392511
This. You are all virgin faggots. Go out and get laid. No one cares if your cock has any extra skin or not.

>> No.6392530

>>6392512
I've personally met many who do.
I'd be willing to provide contact information if you wanted to ask them yourself.

>> No.6392533

>>6392262

You realize you are comparing the medication needed to treat a medical condition with a completely unnecesairy preventative measure for your wild sexcapdes right?

>> No.6392535
File: 102 KB, 433x312, wekCJ.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6392535

>>6392527
>>6392511
Beta cutbetas detected

>> No.6392539

>>6392533
>Implying that Birth Control isn't used to help treat other reproductive health issues.

Go OD again Limbaugh.

>> No.6392540

>>6392527
>No one cares if your cock has any extra skin or not.

>rejected multiple times for being cut

>> No.6392541
File: 157 KB, 193x237, 777426771_187231.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6392541

>>6392533
Confirmed for yet another beta who doesn't know what the birth control pill does

>> No.6392543

>>6392535
>not even bro, but nice try.

>> No.6392545
File: 21 KB, 412x250, betamax.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6392545

>>6392543
>yfw

>> No.6392549
File: 212 KB, 485x409, YOU ARE ALREADY MAD.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6392549

This entire thread is just pathetic.
I hope to god that people don't literally believe that getting circumcised mean that you'll never have sex again.
Jesus fuck y'all are retarded.

>> No.6392773

>>6392506

More birth control coverage = less unplanned children. The average cost of a delivery(without complications) is around $10,000. Women and children's health also improves dramatically when birth control is widely available, which should make sense since when women plan their children, they are able to provide for them properly.

All in all, insurance covering BC would lower the cost of insurance, since covering BC costs less than covering for a pregnancy/childbirth.

>Conservatives in charge of financial responsibility