[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/cgl/ - Cosplay & EGL


View post   

File: 154 KB, 750x750, 898db8957fb8f9282010080625b23666.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10724474 No.10724474[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

Some of us don't have the time to keep up, others haven't been around when something interesting happened, and some others might enjoy the nostalgia of sharing. Feel free to vent too

>> No.10724478

While I would love a tea thread, the farms exist because mods cracked down on gossip threads essentially banning them years ago. This is why we can't even talk about our queen here anymore. But things have been lax lately since we've had threads on Tyler and the other clown so let's see if this thread lasts.

>> No.10726086 [DELETED] 

Im trying to figure out whyt this comm has many batshit crazies and jealous ppls?

>> No.10726165

>>10724478
Jannies are summoned when you mention a few specific names otherwise they seem absent.

>> No.10726627

>american brolita join the comm
>troons out 2 years later
>beg comm members to pay for surgeries
>drama
>comm splits

Thank you america

>> No.10726631

>>10726627
Your fault for allowing a male into the comm

>> No.10726633

>>10726627
you should never allow a male in your comm.

Gatekeeping is good. Don't let idiots tell you otherwise.

>> No.10726634
File: 3.17 MB, 1536x2048, RDT_20220201_1838045502792401527438431.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10726634

>>10726627
Jordy?

>> No.10726637

>>10726627
At least it made peak some lolitas, including myself

>> No.10726639

>>10726637
>Try to go to /lgbt/ to get out of my terf echochambers and see the other side's pov.
>I'm now even more terfic

those men aren't women trapped inside a man's body, they are just delusional coomers.

>> No.10726640

Guy here, so are you women here just unhinged bpd narcissists?

>> No.10726642

>>10726640
with your logic of using such a small portion of anonymously veiled people who have the freedom to say whatever they want

are men on 4chan schizophrenic coomers? no, because it's such a small portion of people with an anonymous veil, where people tend to exaggerate everything because they can.

>> No.10726643

>>10726642
>are men on 4chan schizophrenic coomers?
Nayrt but they are. Why do you think they're all trooning out

>> No.10727855

>>10726639
The funniest thing is that /lgbt/ is much LESS unhinged than their various Reddit stalking grounds.

>> No.10727877

>>10726642
>are men on 4chan schizophrenic coomers?
they are, actually

>> No.10727984
File: 45 KB, 410x391, 1474998952966.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10727984

>>10726627
I miss being a lonelita, my comm are such tranny worshipping itas but then I'd have literally no one to talk to offline aside from my mom since I have no friends.

>> No.10727985

>>10724474
So what’s up with Granny Lolita, Erika? Do you think they’ll still wear the fashion until they’re 90? What will happen to their collection? Does anyone know if they go to meetups?

>> No.10727995

>>10727984
Just cut them off since you don't like them anyways.

>> No.10727997

>>10727995
Too depressed and lonely.

>> No.10728020

>>10727985
Who is that? Girls like m**sicbox, joe*le and ar*gateaux are in their late 30's or 40's. They still wear it and go to meets. Is there an age limit nonny?

>> No.10728030

>>10727984
are you me?

>> No.10728045

>>10727985
Erika is legend. If the world is just, they will be buried with their burando.

>> No.10728051

>>10727985
>>10728020
>meetups

i don't think there's an age limit for the fashion or its general community but do wonder what older people get out of comm meetups. i'm in my early 30's and stopped going a few years ago because everyone just felt so young. discussion was almost always wokeism, money issues, or very age-specific things like explaining the fashion to parents while still living with them, wearing it to college, etc

>> No.10728052

I bought a dress from Jo*M and it came reeking of BO

>> No.10728058

>>10728052
The dress i bought from her smelled like BO too. And she took forever to ship it.

>> No.10728061

>>10728051
Sounds like your comms issue is just being boring and/or you literally made them up. My comm is a lot of mixed ages though mostly early 30s and younger, and we have a lot of fun casual conversation about random topics that don't have to be lolita.

>> No.10728229

>>10728030
Maybe

>> No.10728238

>>10728051
>stopped going a few years ago
There may very well have been older members added to your group in the meantime. I've noticed you really have to keep checking back once in a while to see who has joined, and usher then away from the itas to your own little friend group.

>> No.10728294

>>10728020
I literally said Erika anon, Erika Tsukinose

>> No.10728295

>>10728294
Most people on cgl are incapable of using the rest of the internet properly it seems.

>> No.10728298

>>10728294
>caring about some random cross dressing old man
Oh no, wokester or scrote detected.

>> No.10728703

>>10728052
>>10728058
Her and k8 would be best friends

>> No.10728721

>>10728298
Not at all? They literally own/have items that aren’t sold on the second hand market, they have pictures of how the OLD brand stores looked, etc. it’s definitely about archival purposes.

>> No.10728736

>>10728721
And "she's" a cross dressing scrote.

>> No.10728868
File: 471 KB, 640x640, 1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10728868

Since this was a huge discussion the other day... From this weeks BTB.

>> No.10728874

>>10728868
I find it funny that people think they should be free to mix the two, it's not misogynistic, it's fucking ignorant and retarded to think lolita fashion communities want to be connected to that shit. It really shows the striking autism in some of these people who do this crap.

>> No.10728875

>>10728736
Never called them she, and they have shown no evidence of sexualizing the fashion. Let go of those pearls nonny.

>> No.10728881

>>10728868
The bottom middle post wasn't even from tokimeki, it was from an unrelated lolita. Weird they're calling that person a whore when she NEVER posts anything even remotely sexual, just because she doesn't think some ethot needs to be harassed.

>> No.10728882

>>10728881
Fuck sw stans too

>> No.10728884

>>10728882
You can have that opinion but it's retarded to say
>these whores are mad we are calling them what they are

when the person was literally not a sw/'whore'

>> No.10728889

>>10726642
Based reply nonnie.

>> No.10728937 [DELETED] 

>>10728881
TB reposted that in her stories...

>> No.10728938

>>10728881
>>10728884
TB reposted this in her stories.

>>10728882
Agree. Fuck swers and fuck their simps. They all can perish.

>> No.10728944

>>10724474
sage for ot but when there’s a cake like this with flower petals do you eat the petals or pick them off?

>> No.10728948

>>10728944
Whatever you want, they're edible but bitter.

>> No.10728951

>>10728948
they're only bitter if the chef is an idiot. most edible flowers have no flavor besides roses, which aren't bitter unless they're old.

>> No.10728954

>>10728951
this anon eats flowers lul

>> No.10728956

>>10728954
all lolitas have eaten flowers.

>> No.10728957

>>10728954
i'm a pastry chef, soup.

>> No.10728958

>>10728061

Nta but that anon sounds like they have the same issue I did. It's not really that far off to find you're not mixing with a younger group of people, in fact it's probably more common than to find a younger group of people who are actually mature for their age.

That being said I saw a few >30 year olds getting along in that group because they were gossipy and thrived on the drama of younger people. Felt kind of gross to me.

>> No.10728969

Since we're on the gossip thread, why is the jfashionwatchdog account out here posting literal whos and randos. I appreciate her service, but it seems like a lot of the stuff she posts lately aren't really predators, just weirdos with weird kinks. I wish she'd stick to posting actual predators instead of one of the bajillion people who can't tag correctly.

>> No.10728973

>>10728969
They're mad that anyone could ever be horny and also like cute clothes I guess.

I'm not into ethot behavior and don't post any of my hobbies online, but yeah I guess they just decided to moralfag over a couple sluts for no reason despite the overload of pervs and freaks creeping on actual children regularly.

>> No.10728984
File: 10 KB, 240x320, 80e522308f30a77a3b477683d59ec691.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10728984

i used to have this usakumya that i used to pour tea on and suck the tea back out of and it was sopping wet all the time. i used to slam it against walls and it would make a loud thud

>> No.10728989

>>10728868
I don’t get it, if TM wasn’t a sex worker and just posted sexy cosplays would you be fine with it, then? Is it the sw that’s the problem or her not being modestly dressed?

>> No.10728990

>>10728954
and you probably ate crayons as a child soup so?

>> No.10728991

>>10728989
What I'm confused about is TM is no longer a lolita, she sold all/most of her stuff a while ago and no longer wears it. It's not like she's trying to involve it with her SW so I feel like people would be best ignoring her, she's just another cringey egirl who does OF at this point..

>> No.10728994

>>10728989
Not that anon that posted that nor do I know anything about that person but there is a stigma with relating lolita fashion to anything sexual. It's meant to be one of the few feminine things people can enjoy that isn't about sex so there is an aggressive stance against it. Coupled with the fact that sex work is already a shameful thing.

>> No.10729008

>>10728991
nayrt but her account literally says jfashion as the description, no indication of 18+ but it's just ewhore sex work and no jfashion at all. also seems to cater to sw to minors.

>> No.10729010

>>10729008
Jfashion isn't lolita anon. Who cares honestly. Minors aren't paying her OF, and are exposed to porn on the big bad internet all the time. Going through her posts, many minors are exposed to worse shit on mainstream movies and HBO.

>> No.10729011

>>10728957
>pastry chef
oui oui. what coord do you wear when you bake stuff?
>>10728956
>>10728990
damn my bad gulls. I didnt know lolitas were so sensitive about their flowers damn

>> No.10729015

>>10728994
Sorry, but there’s no such thing. To exist as a woman is to be sexualized, either “positively” (as in men compliment you, harass you because they find you sexually attractive) or “negatively” (men harass you and insult you because they don’t find you sexually attractive)

Lolita fashion was never solely created to fight back against sexualization. That only makes sense if you think all lolita is classic or sweet. The gothic side of the fashion has always had ties to the fetish community due to it being related to goth subculture.

Men are going to be men. Getting rid of all sex workers and fetishists isn’t going to change how outsiders treat us and how men treat us. If you oppose sex workers because it makes members inside the lolita community uncomfortable, fine. But don’t pretend you’re doing it to protect us from outsiders.

>> No.10729019

>>10728989
If you're a lolita, you should recognize that modesty is part of the fashion, and never mix sex work or thot shit with it.

>> No.10729020

>>10729019
Nta but how did she mix thot shit with it? She didn't ever do thotty stuff in her lolita outfits and seemingly doesn't wear it anymore.

>> No.10729027

>>10729015
I believe that sex workers destroy the image of women regardless of if they are lolita or not. They really don't give a shit how much the throw women under the bus for some change so naturally why should we as women care to let them in our spaces? They have their moids to talk to, they can leave us alone.

>> No.10729029

>>10729010
Honestly this. If you’re old enough to be on Instagram, your old enough to see some ass cheeks. It’s like all these pearl clutches have forgotten that kids who have Instagram also have internet access, and are probably already looking up actual porn.

>>10729027
Honestly sounds like a you problem. Tons of girls I know make all kinds of choices I wouldn’t make. They do all kinds of jobs I wouldn’t do. Who cares if they’re making an only fans side hustle? Believe it or not, not everything is about you and your opinion. Why not focus that energy on actual predators/creepers in the community instead of hyper focusing on policing the behavior of people who genuinely enjoy and partake in the fashion?

>> No.10729032

>>10729029
>Why not focus that energy on actual predators/creepers in the community instead of hyper focusing on policing the behavior of people who genuinely enjoy and partake in the fashion?
This. But these accounts are worse bc they're like going after people who don't even wear lolita.

>> No.10729034

>>10729029
My way of dealing with those people is to not interact with them. Being around them i just feel the stench of scrote ruining everything. I have enough energy to hate nasty scrotes and their panderers. It's just like i refuse to hang out with somebody who takes drugs or has an alcohol addiction, why would i associate with someone who i look down own? idaf about them and I don't have to.

>> No.10729039

>>10729034
Kek too sad for you. Scrotes are everywhere. Baby was founded and is currently led by a “scrote”. Cry about it and maybe get some therapy for your issues instead of pretending like the rest of the community feels like you do.

>> No.10729046

>>10729015
I was explaining the reason behind the hate of sexual connection and lolita. Nothing in my post was about what I think but how it is and why the hate exists.

>> No.10729048

>>10729027
would men really act any better towards women if porn didn't exist? there were times in history where porn didn't exist or was rare and men still treated women like shit, so i don't think it's correlated

>> No.10729049

>>10729039
this board doesn't consider japanese men to be real men for some reason. creepy dudes like novala and crossdressers get a pass here as long as they're japanese. it's weird

>> No.10729051

>>10729048
>would men really act any better towards women if porn didn't exist?
NTA
Actually yes. Men will always treat women like shit but in your scenario of taking porn away would have them treat them (and themselves) LESS like shit. You know what porn sickness does to people?

>> No.10729068

>>10729051
do radfems really? those pornsick fuckers are better off being addicted.

>> No.10729071

>>10729051
Men have been treating women like shit since before porn existed.

>> No.10729072

>>10729068
They really don't. It leads them to have fucked up views and expectations about sex and their own performance is stunted when they do actually have sex leading to even more mental and confidence issues.

>> No.10729074

>>10729071
Yes, thank you for reading my post and coming to the same conclusion I just said
>Men will always treat women like shit

>> No.10729075

>>10729072
Nta and porn addiction is bad but women have been mistreated long before porn addiction negatively affected men. Even currently porn addiction is more likely to make them impotent sad incels than anything.

>> No.10729079

>>10729074
But they won't treat them any less like shit so you're wrong. We got treated worse BEFORE pornsick scrotes were a thing and even as porn has grown more prominent we are getting more rights. Or do you have a fundamental misunderstanding of how women's rights have progressed since the days where we were property?

>> No.10729082

>>10729075
Why do you keep thinking I said women haven't been mistreated nor will continue to be mistreated when I said the opposite?
>>10729079
>but they won't
Look, I know men are fucked up. Always have been, always will. But their issues end up becoming our issues. Men consuming more and more porn leads to more and more porn being created and who exactly are the ones performing for them? Women. Who get taken advantage of the most in the porn industry? Women. This leaks out into media in general with girls growing up thinking this is the way they are supposed to be and businesses taking advantage of that. Said pornsick men are not just incels also husbands and fathers that end up leading unhappy and fucked up families. I'm saying out of the 10 things wrong with men taking one of them away and having 9 problems is still progress.

>> No.10729096

>>10729082
If you're so concerned about women stop with the "what ifs". No one wants to hear it. You're theorizing and idealizing instead of actually doing anything. Instead of arguing here go help women who were trafficked. But you'll probably just tell them they would have been fine without porn.

>> No.10729104

>>10729096
Bold of you to assume just because I'm posting on 4chan means I'm not active in my community and work with these people first hand seeing the results on both ends. Actually that isn't bold at all, most people here don't interact with people in general so I'm not going to hold it against you for assuming. You can have the last post after this, I have a plane to catch tomorrow and need to go to bed.

>> No.10729107

>>10729082
girls always had unhealthy role models in media and toys... and men have always assaulted/abused women and seen them as just holes or baby machines... looong before porn. it really hasn't gotten any worse, it's just the methods and means that they use to abuse women is different now. if porn suddenly disappeared, men would just find another way to debase women anyway

>> No.10729114

>>10729107
libfems may be crazy but OF and camming and other online thottery literally scam simps out of money. anon is so obsessed with being right she thinks the porn industry only damages women. she's stupid though so just ignore her.

>> No.10729121

>>10729114
lolno. thats like saying mcdonalds workers are scamming customers.

>> No.10729123

>>10729020
She doesn't mix them but she doesn't wear jfash anymore either. Why does she insist on clinging to the fact that she used to wear it?

She didn't give a disclaimer to her original followers she'd make a switch to thot shit and doesn't have an 18+ warning on her profile which anons already mentioned. She's exposing her minor followers to this without their consent. She's also alienating more people because they followed her for lolita, not e girl half naked photos. If I was scrolling through my feed at work or on the bus and suddenly saw her recent posts, I'd be confused as hell because there was no warning about the switch. I think that's one issue for the backlash.

Don't forget this girl picked fights with RC and Amino users for innocuous things like wearing nonsexual harnesses in lolita and trying to remove users if she thought they were kinksters in private.

>> No.10729125

I just dont like porn and sex workers because its gross. I don't even care about the moral argument. Its like if someone liked swimming in sewage all day and drinking shit and piss to make money. I don't care if it's hurting anyone else or not. it's disgusting and I don't really want to deal with that person.

>> No.10729127

>>10729114
there is a ton of information out there on how the porn industry hurts women, stop sticking up for this gross industry

>> No.10729131

>>10729114
>haha just ignore her
This reads like someone trying to prevent others from doing research and stay oblivious.

>> No.10729132

I find blonde hair and blue eyed lolitas to be such a turn off. Not saying they are automatically ugly but blue eyes are so over hyped and it feels like they are staring deep in my soul plus the blonde hair looks so bland in contrast with their white skin. It just doesn't look as pretty as dark hair or dark skin and dark eyes

>> No.10729134

>>10729123
Just unfollow her if you're that bothered by it.

>> No.10729141

>>10729107
I guess instant access via a device even most children will have at a certain point is just fine and inevitable, oh well. More technology doesn't mean scrote behavior should be more acceptable and normalized. Let's not deal with an existing centuries long problem because technology is changing so quickly so more children should be exposed to whatever cuz it's the wild west baby!!

>> No.10729144

>>10727984
>since I have no friends
gee i wonder why

>> No.10729153

>>10729144
You will never be a woman.

>> No.10729168

>>10729039
Wait, evidence on Baby’s owner being a scrote?

>> No.10729170

>>10729168
Holy newfag

>> No.10729171

>>10729170
Yes now spoonfeed me

>> No.10729176

>looking forward to some tea
>click thread
>just gulls sperging about trannies and scrotes again

>> No.10729192

>>10729125
No one says you have to deal with them but actively dogpiling on them and labeling them as predators when they're just thots is false.

>> No.10729193

>>10729123
None of her content is 18+ on the actual Instagram page. There is no need for a disclaimer. Half-naked is a weird pearl clutching stretch considering she's at most worn some pajamas that show less than a swimsuit. Cringey e-girl shit is also kind of a part of j-fashion these days (sadly the styles are common even in Japan, gyaru brands have straight up been releasing that shit), and lolita is not the only j-fashion, so she can not be a lolita and still be wearing j-fashion.

Expecting a disclaimer about her content changing is dumb when the majority of her posts aren't NSFW and you have to click her link to see any actual porn or whatever I assume (I haven't clicked but what is currently on her ig page is truly harmless).

>> No.10729194

>>10729171
No

>> No.10729213 [DELETED] 

Just found out this person who was a total cunt to me over a dress is some ugly white washed up looking insta thot hag lmao. Trashy white women do not belong in this fashion.

>> No.10729216

This person who was a total cunt to me over a dress ended up being some ugly white washed up looking insta thot hag lmao. Fuck trashy white women, they do not belong in this fashion.

>> No.10729217

>>10729127
Nta and yes, but a lot of independent sex work gives power and consent back to the women doing it. OF allows you to decide exactly what you want to post. Its not like an actual studio where you can be exploited much easier.

>> No.10729257

>>10729192
This. Labeling anybody with a thot pic as a predator is the same thing as those people who screech about being raped by someone’s eyes. It’s not the same. At all. Acting like it’s comparable just distracts from actual problems.

>>10729193
This. Insta does not allow porn by its terms of service. If you really think minors need protection from a girl in a swimsuit I suggest you go back to your religious commune.

>> No.10729260

>>10729217
NTA but OF is one out of a world wide industry and problem. You're accepting sex work because of one independent driven network vs the trafficking and manipulation of everything else. You know the reason Pornhub cracked down on having proven identity is because of how many people were posted there without their consent? How many rape videos? People trafficked? And that's just one website, the streets are much worse. All so coomers can coom someone is getting kidnapped and drugged to be a sex toy.

>> No.10729262

>>10729260
nta but no one said all sex work is unproblematic. but in case of some rando thot having an OF account she is not trafficking anyone. demonizing anyone who is nude online under the guise of protecting trafficking victims is stupid. at least others itt are just admitting they're slut shaming, not pretending they are being virtuous.

>> No.10729263

>>10729260
sex work is problematic but needs regulation since it's the only option for many women. you need to calm down

>> No.10729285

>>10729193
She labels her and her bfs onlyfans accounts as "accounting" and doesn't even put an 18+ warning label on them. Curious and confused ppl click it and see a sensitive content warning (put there by link tree, not her) that still does not mention nsfw content. Sensitive content means nearly anything in this day and age thanks to sjws. If you click through its her porn which thank fuck she has it behind a pay wall but unfortunately there's still "sexy" text.

>>10729257
Insta doesn't allow cp either but it's there and reporting it does nothing. The app is rife with porn, including softcore that she posts.

>> No.10729289

>>10729285
oh no a child might see 'sexy' text/images, not like they could ever see that in a modern American advertisement in public, good thing major companies like fast food using tight clothes on women in ads kids might see is illegal /s

also insta not moderating illegal content has nothing to do with her and wearing underwear or tight clothes is not softcore porn. or do you think period panty ads and lingerie ads are softcore porn? are classical paintings or any nude art softcore porn? are swimsuits porn? are shirtless men softcore porn? calvin klein should be banned from insta posts i guess.

you also have to be at least 13 (in some places older) to even have an account; no 13 year old is being groomed or duped into subbing to her OF. if you hate 'sensitive content' so much why use 4chan knowing what they allow on cgl as far as sexy cosplay?

>> No.10729292

>>10729289
>do you think period panty ads and lingerie ads are softcore porn? are classical paintings or any nude art softcore porn? are swimsuits porn? are shirtless men softcore porn? calvin klein should be banned from insta posts i guess.
Unironically yes for all these capitalist perversions sans classical art because of intent. There is far more to arousal than just an exposed body as in an academic or allegorical setting it can have significance beyond engaging the reptile brain.

>> No.10729298

>>10729292
>There is far more to arousal than just an exposed body
>unironically thinks ads targeted at women in a t shirt and granny panties for their bleeding pussies are pornographic

oh ok so ur just braindead

>> No.10729302

>>10729289
nta the anon you're arguing with but, seriously people who are defending a sex worker for having previous lolita images on their insta and then putting sex work on it later - you think people can't pull up their insta from previous lolita images on the internet and then see the two connected?

The whole issue is that you should not serve both the lolita fashion and other 'sexual' in nature things on your public posts. Truthfully, I don't want an eye full of someone's body from following them because of lolita. You get me?

>> No.10729305

>>10729302
>Truthfully, I don't want an eye full of someone's body from following them because of lolita. You get me?
then don't follow them or screen their recent posts before following? i do this for anything even innocent kawaii art or craft accounts just to see if i like all their content, and don't follow immediately from one or two pics

>> No.10729316

>>10729298
There are more decent ways to advertise these things than to have sexual undertones sprinkled throughout. Not all of them are bad I'm just saying in the example you're giving it can be.

>> No.10729317

>>10729132
brown eye copium, sorry you were born like that anon

>> No.10729318

>>10729132
>>10729317
Green eyes are the best tbhqwyfd

>> No.10729319

>>10729317
Incest eyes cope

>> No.10729322

>>10729316
if you think any skin on a woman's body is inherently sexual that's a you problem anon. no one else but fetishists get turned on looking at period underwear ads.

>> No.10729324

>>10729319
more like mutant evolution cope, but imagine thinking neanderthal features are superior

>> No.10729326

>>10729324
i guess a few prehistoric humans did, or they were just so undesirable they had to breed with neanderthals because real humans found them repulsive.

>> No.10729339

>>10729125
Based.

>> No.10729340

>>10729192
NORMALIZE SHAMING SEX WORKERS.

>> No.10729342

>>10728868
It's incredibly awkward and actually gross seeing all of the young girls (minors) interacting with her. They all 'yaaaaaas queen' her sw and she coddles them back, glamorizing sw to them. Then you go on to look at those minors profiles and it's all sexy photos of themselves as underage teens. This is sexual grooming of minors. What she is doing is grooming them into sexualizing themselves and they are inevitably going to end up down the same swer route as TB. We seem to only care if men sexualize children. But why aren't we just as disgusted when a grown woman grooms and sexualizes these children?

>> No.10729343

>>10729010
>condones exposing children to sexual content

>> No.10729344

>>10729015
ewhores wearing jfashion tells coomers its something inherently sexual. coomers then go on to sexualize others they see wearing jfashion. this isnt rocket science nonny.

>> No.10729345

>>10729342
she is not grooming or sexualizing kids just because their parents aren't watching them to make sure they aren't thotting it up on ig. she posts nothing risque on her page. she owes children a dni in her bio at most, but it's parents' jobs to be monitoring their kids or igs to be verifying ages/limiting content, not a creator.

please provide an example of her interacting with confirmed minors in any way that would be grooming?

>> No.10729346

>>10729344
coomers have been sexualizing girls in jfashion since before ewhores were a thing and would even if they didn't exist. men are shit period and women are not the reason men are shit in any capacity.

>> No.10729347

>>10729027
THIS 100%. Keep them excluded. There is no reason why we should be tolerant and accepting of swers and their filth.

>> No.10729349

>>10729029
these are also the creeps, perverts and the predators nonnie. just because woman does not mean they aren't perverts. shoving a camera up your asshole for everyone to see is pretty fucking depraved and perverted.

>> No.10729356

>>10729123
>Don't forget this girl picked fights with RC and Amino users for innocuous things like wearing nonsexual harnesses in lolita and trying to remove users if she thought they were kinksters in private.

what a straight up piece of shit hypocrite. she even sent death threats to lolitas. shes fucking scum bruh

>> No.10729358

>>10729345
It's all over her IG. OP even briefly looked through her followers and most of them are minors, as shown in the picture.

>> No.10729359

>>10729358
it's not up to adults to keep minors off their profiles, it's the minors parents job.

>> No.10729362

>>10729359
Seems desperate for attention with having a public swer profile. In the very least could state 18+ or make it private.

At least set up the age restriction on your account by turning it into a creator account.
Settings —> Brand/Creator —> Minimum age

>> No.10729367

>>10729362
they should be doing that, yes. i think that sw need to tag their content, but that's just on them for their protection. parents need to protect their own kids.

>> No.10729376

>>10729367
Ok and how can a parent protect their kids when she's using sfw tags?

>> No.10729377

>>10729367
Nice victim blaming, whore.

>> No.10729378

>>10729376
^^^^this

>> No.10729381

>>10729377
TB is the whore.

>> No.10729383

>>10729377
saying its the childs fault is victim blaming. since the children are the actual victims.

>> No.10729384

>>10729381
Whore defenders are just as awful

>> No.10729386

>>10729376
by monitoring their internet access? it's the parent's fault for letting their minors be on insta to begin with.

>> No.10729387

>>10728868
Why do you care, she clearly doesn’t wear lolita anymore, this reeks of vendetta

>> No.10729388

>>10729342
Perverted child groomer sex predator for sure.
>>10729349
Based truth.

>> No.10729400

>>10729377
she could put 18+ or something in her profile or 'minors do not interact' like some people do but desu if a kid is on ig not being monitored they may see 18+ as "oh so this is where i get the racy content", plus her content on the actual app is not 18+ or pornographic, and kids lie about their age online all the time. you have to confirm your age on porn sites all the time to watch and teens will just click yes and see shit anyway unless parents monitor them.

the parents are the shitty ones, not watching their kids. even creators who go to great lengths to keep minors out of their content, whether that be sw related or just they don't want to interact with kids online, and kids don't listen, so the parents should be appropriately protecting their kids, especially with the very public knowledge that instagram is harmful to their mental health, even when used in a non sexual way.

>> No.10729401

Damn I remember people here had a vendetta for Tokimeki and I guess it has stood the test of time, just now the vendetta is for the opposite reason. How much you wanna bet the anon sperging about her being a child predator is one of the littles she outed trying to deflect attention away from themselves? Kek

>> No.10729404

>>10729400
Shes even posted videos telling minors not to consider pursuing sw, how are people gonna call her a predator when she clearly tries to keep minors away from her content. Parents need to monitor their kids better, stop shoving the onus onto random internet strangers to babysit your kiddos.

>> No.10729408

>>10729400
you're probably arguing with 19 year old zoomers who are LITERALLY CHILDREN or some shit.

>> No.10729413 [DELETED] 
File: 184 KB, 720x931, FB_IMG_1644429969800.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10729413

>> No.10729415

why can none of you go 5 minutes without going on a tirade about sw

>> No.10729418

>>10729415
that is literally what the current drama is about and this is a tea thread.

>> No.10729424

>>10729404
Where? All I see is her and her degenerate troon gfs OF.

>> No.10729432

>>10729424
fucking disgusting

>> No.10729433

>>10729289
>do you think period panty ads and lingerie ads are softcore porn? are classical paintings or any nude art softcore porn? are swimsuits porn? are shirtless men softcore porn? calvin klein should be banned from insta posts i guess.
I understand you're braindead but period underwear and swimsuit ads aren't used to sell pornographic content. Nude art is art, no one is cooming to that. There's a big difference between those and lewd photos used solely to promote your OF. I can't believe you're this stupid to think something like a swimsuit ad is akin to porn but it says enough about you.

>> No.10729439

>>10729305
Are you dumb or not reading the replies? It's been said that she did post lolita images before switching with no content or age restriction warning >>10729285 >>10729123

If someone screens her profile to see sfw lolita images then she suddenly switches to sw why is that the followers fault? They need to check content creators profiles after every post to avoid this? She's the problematic one and you picked a weird hill to die on.

>> No.10729440

>>10729404
>Shes even posted videos telling minor
That's with pre-knowledge minors follow her and makes this way way way way worse... holy shit, gurl, private your shit..

>> No.10729441

>>10729439
Based on her page she switched her content trajectory over years ago, why do you suddenly care so much now? Also why do you expect a content warning over a swimsuit, try not to go full sperg-mode at the beach lmao

>> No.10729443

>>10729424
Her troon gf is straight up one of the grossest people I've ever seen.

>> No.10729444

>>10729440
> minors exist in spaces they clearly don’t belong so instead of expecting parents to monitor their children better I’ll instead place all responsibility on random internet adults to private their accounts lest some 14 yr old see a breath of cleavage
seek therapy

>> No.10729445

>>10729441
nta but I'm getting the idea that someone on here is actually said girl and I have no clue who she is. the whiteknighting, the illogical fallacies.. no one can be that fucking stupid, unless they are whiteknighting their own shit on 4chan.

dude, just fucking seperate your SFW content from the NSFW content. How many brain cells do you have left from literally completely desensitizing yourself. It's obvious you're a SW because you are comparing NSFW content to a swimsuit model. These are not the same. Sorry, but you're outing yourself because normal people have normal sensitivity levels.

>> No.10729446

>>10729440
this, that's genuinely appalling.

>>10729441
what, are you placing a time limit on condemning appalling behavior? Also kek you're retarded if you think a literal porn ad is the same thing as someone just existing in a swimsuit on a beach.

>> No.10729447

>>10729443
nice self-reply

>> No.10729448

>>10729440
Right! She knows they follow her and does nothing about it. Doesn't private or block them. She actually responds and converses with them when they interact on her account. Serious grooming behavior.

>> No.10729449

>>10729444
anon, you have more green text replies than my own. I think you're the one that needs the therapy. lmao. especially considering it sounds like you're a SW. that hole runs deep and soon you'll be snorting coke off a homeless man's dick.

>> No.10729450

>>10729444
imagine thinking that a SW directly addressing children on an adult account isnt a red flag. seek therapy

>> No.10729452

>>10729448
i wasn't sure what to make of this because i thought she was just minding her own business after switching to being an adult account. but yikes this just solidified that she's a piece of shit.

>> No.10729453

>>10729450
this this this this. holy shit the amount of crazy someone has to be to address children on a sex worker account is fucking off the charts.

>> No.10729455

>>10729445
Based.

>> No.10729457

>>10729450
literally never seen her interact with minors, you really sound like you’re reaching.

>> No.10729458

>>10729457
You seem to know an awful lot about her nonny.

>> No.10729459

>>10729457
anon, considering I'm assuming you're the same person that has been defending the girl this entire time in this thread- this comeback this late in the game is really a last ditch attempt after thinking normal people's sensitivity levels are unhinged compared to a sex worker.

nah dude, you're the abnormal one. stop being a fucking pedophile freak and private or separate your shit.

>> No.10729461

>>10729453
Holy fuck pedophilia. Interacting with minors on her sex work whore account???

>> No.10729462

>>10729008
Her OF is a link off her profile and you have to pay to see her content. Also, most minors start looking up and watching at like 12 these days. If nobody is talking to these minors and trying to groom them; stop sperging out.

>> No.10729466
File: 355 KB, 441x883, chrishansen.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10729466

>>10729462
>Also, most minors start looking up and watching at like 12 these days
>Sounds like the start of an episode of How to Catch a Predator

You realize you're sounding more and more like a fucking pedophile, right?

>> No.10729467

>>10729171
Akinori Isobe is the founder, Novala Takemoto is one of their designers and has designed a huge portion of their pieces. Both scrotes and crossdressers.
How do you wear lolita and not know this basic info?

>> No.10729469

>>10729461
Her sex work account is paywalled, no one under 18 has access to that.

>> No.10729472

>>10729469
Anon, you do understand that interacting with people you know follow you and are minors as an adult talking about adult related things is catering to a minor audience and it's with full knowledge that those minors very likely somehow got access to their nudes.

And the justification, again for >> Also, most minors start looking up and watching at like 12 these days.

to me, that just proved to me you're said girl. because this is fucking BAT SHIT pedophile psychology.

>> No.10729473

>>10729469
also you maybe didn't know this, because you know, you're a visitor to 4chan and all just because you're the topic at hand but

People save your photos and share them on other websites. So yes, minors have likely looked at them. Interacting with them is acknowledging that.

You're really digging a hole for her or yourself. I'm not even sure, but you're definitely not making this better

>> No.10729474

>>10729472
I’m not the same anon lol
I checked and all her socials say 18+ minors dni etc etc, and her nsfw is paywalled as others have said, where exactly is she encouraging minors to interact

>> No.10729477

>>10729141
children stumbled upon dad's porn mag stash before the internet. before photos existed, they would stumble upon porn comic stashes instead. i'm not saying it's a good thing, just that nothing is really different today. men were always and will always be horrible to women. that's not going to change in any of our lifetimes

>>10729263
it's really never the "only option" for anyone. how do you think men manage to survive without prostituting themselves, even if they're in poverty?

>> No.10729500

>>10729473
But why is it her fault that people steal her photos and pass them around in places they shouldn't be posted, in places where minors aren't supposed to be? Is she supposed to just operate under the assumption that every minor has seen her nudes?

>> No.10729501

>>10729477
>it's really never the "only option" for anyone. how do you think men manage to survive without prostituting themselves, even if they're in poverty?
THISSSSSSSSSS
Most of them are honestly above average looks too, they're just hoping to profiteer and coast off that so they don't have to get a real job at all, it's not about "escaping poverty" lmao

Yeah Bella Thorne got an OF to escape poverty, uh-huh

>> No.10729504

>>10729477
>how do you think men manage to survive without prostituting themselves
you are really asking this retarded question in a world that puts even the most idiotic man on a pedestal

>> No.10729511

>>10729168
He's triggered that anons don't want him in their comm so he's spreading half-truths and acts like lolita brands aren't 95% female designers.

>>10729467
>Novala Takemoto is one of their designers and has designed a huge portion of their pieces
He made one line of clothes with his logo back in 2004 but isn't a designer. Isobe is also founded it together with his wife.

>> No.10729513

>>10729459
I'm NTA and also think you are psychotic.

I'm legitimately convinced someone she outed as an ageplayer is mad and trying to get people to attack her for being a hoe. As if tons of people aren't shameless thots on the internet all the time. No one cares if she's not mixing it with lolita which she isn't.

>> No.10729516

>>10729511
Sorry I should clarify, he’s not a main designer and is more of a consultant, he still has put in opinions and such on designs here and there over the last few years and they’ve come to him for some ideas - I got to meet him a few years ago pre-pandemic.

>> No.10729518

>>10729466
I’m not the same anon dumbass, I’m just speaking from experience because I first started looking up porn at 12, and kids at school would watch it and show me on their phones.

>> No.10729519

>>10729469
The link to said paywall is listed as "accounting"

Who the fuck links to OF and calls it something mundane like their accounting site, paywall be damned

>> No.10729520

>>10729467
Novala is not their designer, never has been. Yikes. They did a collab, once, almost 2 decades ago.

>> No.10729521

>>10729474
>all her socials
Not her Instagram, dumb fuck. Her Twitter was nsfw and wasn't privated until recently.

>> No.10729525

>>10729216
You sound a lot more salty and cunty than they do right now desu

>> No.10729526

>>10729520
I know I worded it wrong lmao he’s a fashion consultant still for a few brands.

>> No.10729532

>>10729513
I can kiiiiiiinda understand people's issues with her but yeah, there's about a billion girls wearing aliexpress egirl clothing who put "JFASHION" on their bios
If they went after all of those people too I would say they're being consistent, but they're not. It's the fact that she used to be a lolita that bothers them.

Either way it's stupid, you're not going to "shame" her into taking it out of her bio, you're just convincing her to keep it there even more because you angered her. It worked on the "NO BLM" girl but the situations are very different, not like TM is losing followers because of this. It's a nobody cares situation in reality.

>> No.10729534

>>10729513
It's hilarious how it's ok for her to out age players and kinksters keeping their sex life on the DL but when she gets called out for her pedo baiting and asian fishing it's not acceptable. Hypocrite much?

>> No.10729556

>>10729519
Shady af.

>> No.10729562

>>10729457
Kek with a response that confident, you either are her or a WKing coomer

>> No.10729567

>>10729477
>how do you think men manage to survive without prostituting themselves
Construction work, coal mines, the army, and other jobs that require physical labor that women wouldn't be able to do. Also men go gay for pay plenty, just look at incel lolcows.

>> No.10729570

>>10729526
Which brands?

>> No.10729573

>>10729477
sex work is the hard labor for women. why are radfems so uneducated?

>> No.10729579
File: 25 KB, 498x400, IMG_0664.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10729579

>>10729217
KEK what a bunch of horseshit
The dude who owns OF can cut the cord anytime and leave all these dumbass OF thots in the dust with nothing if he wanted to. Did you not see the melt downs they had when OF wanted to ban explicit content? You're relying on the platform and scrote paypigs in order to survive. THEY have the control on whether you make money or not, not you. ffs

>> No.10729582

>>10729579
That's not what they mean and you know it. What you're saying is worse at a regular job.

>> No.10729585

>>10729519
It’s a tiktok meme anon

>> No.10729589

>>10729573
Childcare and cleaning is the hard labor for women. If you're actually a poor street walker, sex work is more akin to rape and is incredibly fucking dangerous. These dipshits doing OF are just spoiled lazy white chicks. They're not doing hard labor at all.

>> No.10729594

>>10729589
You sound pretty bitter, anon. You okay?

>> No.10729596

>>10729594
Bitter about literally what? It's not hard labor, that's just a fact.

>> No.10729600

>>10727984
>>10728030
I-I can be your friend nonnas

>>10729082
lol, you're talking like porn access is what grant women rights in the west. Porn acceptance and women liberation are unrelated movements. They were pushed by different kind of people, and followed different narrative and ideologies. Feminists were massively anti porn, before "sex positive" feminism became a thing in the 80's. I wonder why it is getting shilled so hard while radfems are getting silenced right now...

>> No.10729722

>>10729079
you think that porn is the reason that we have more women's rights? you have to be genuinely fucking stupid.

>> No.10729727

>>10729722
>>10729600
Learn to fucking read you smooth brained troglodytes.

No one thinks porn directly gives women rights, but it's obvious that porn is not responsible for men at large being shitty to women or women legally lacking rights. We have more porn now but also more rights. Porn obviously didn't give women better treatment but it clearly also did not cause men to treat us like shit when they were doing that centuries before porn/millennia before modern porn.

So demonizing porn or thots or whatever else is not going to improve the way men treat women, it is just demonizing other women and taking the focus off of the real issue. Men treat women poorly because men choose to do that, not because of anything women do.

>> No.10729729

god all of you are why this stupid board is dying. what a fucking stupid conversation. I miss the days when jannies bothered to ban for off topic posts because this is getting ridiculous.

>> No.10729732

>>10729567
there's plenty of women in the army already and they could do construction and mining as well. i see fat slobs doing construction all the time, no reason a fit woman can't do it too. "those are too hard, i'm just gonna prostitute myself instead" is being both lazy and pathetic

>> No.10729733

>>10729582
A regular job allows you to build up skills and experience and shit, nobody wants an onlythot working for them. God, this board is such a shithole

>> No.10729760

>>10729585
Meme or not, you're either terminally online or pedo pandering calling your link to porn that.

>> No.10729765

>>10729729
Agreeeeeee I’m sick of it

>> No.10729774

>>10729732
And plenty of men are onlythots. But those fields tend to be vastly dominated by one gender for a fucking reason. Just because a handful of women are construction workers doesnt mean anyone would prefer to hire them over a muscular man for a job that literally requires physical strength

>> No.10729775

>>10729727
Correlation does not equal causation you absolute retard. How can you think anyone consuming violently sexist and racist garbage is going to treat women better? Fucking hell use your brain

>> No.10729796

>>10729775
Anon if you're this illiterate you must be ESL or something. Or I guess just being intentionally obtuse.

>> No.10729800

>>10729796
Nta but anon, please, make an effort to critically think about it.

>> No.10729805

>>10729800
No you just literally can't read. Porn is not the reason men treat women poorly. Men have always treated women poorly before porn existed and would continue to do so even if we banned porn.

Blaming the women doing porn for MEN being awful to women is stupid. Blaming women's behavior in any way for MEN actively choosing to treat women poorly is deflecting responsibility for the actions of men onto women.

I get that you're either ESL or scrotes pretending to be women to stir shit up but please at least pretend to be a little less stupid.

>> No.10729809

>>10729805
Porn doesn't cause men to be shitty to women but it's amazing justification for shitty misogynist beliefs they already have. In addition, porn in itself is a reflection of the hatred men have towards women. Why do you think so much of it is so violent and plays into the idea that women are nothing but holes? Any content in which women are being used as sexual objects for the gratification of men is inherently hateful towards women. If you contribute to this as a woman you might as well be a scrote. Nobody but a scrote would go this hard in defending porn the way you are.

>> No.10729815

>>10729805
No one said porn was the sole cause of misogyny, you illiterate dipshit. The point is that it exacerbates it.

>> No.10729817

>>10729815
Men exacerbate misogyny, not porn.

>> No.10729818

>>10729817
Men dont exist in a vacuum. They are affected by the things they see. Getting off to the abuse of women exacerbates their misogynistic behavior. This is common sense

>> No.10729820

>>10729818
All porn does not depict the abuse of women though. All porn does not even include women.

>> No.10729822

>>10729820
The vast majority of it does. Stop defending scrotes

>> No.10729823

>>10729822
Kek I guess you just don’t know how much gay porn is out there. I wouldn’t call straight porn a “vast” majority, especially for anything made in the last 20 years.

>> No.10729824

>>10729822
The vast majority of porn definitely doesn’t depict the abuse of women anon. Quit clutching onto that victim card. A grown woman having sex with a man on camera is not depicting abuse.

Women who do porn that are grown and making their own decisions shouldn’t be thrown under the bus because some dusty ass gulls are so insecure that they can’t imagine anyone being that comfortable with their body. Yes there’s some shady practices out there, but it’s also super demeaning to act like all these women are victims who couldn’t possibly make such a decision on their own. I suggest you watch the docu series about life after porn. A lot of the women featured explain that the worst part was actually the way they were treated by people outside the industry, who, like you, are making tons of assumptions about women in the adult industry.