[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/cgl/ - Cosplay & EGL


View post   

File: 84 KB, 526x855, 118710219_3442366245880566_3589311386094238329_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10465875 No.10465875 [Reply] [Original]

>> No.10465876
File: 137 KB, 843x843, 118502839_10111354585266987_3850114006568383748_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10465876

>>10465875

>> No.10465877
File: 116 KB, 843x843, 118670368_10221635887539797_6237669454031191852_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10465877

>>10465876

>> No.10465878
File: 152 KB, 843x843, 118653818_4890788010946610_740100113494105125_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10465878

>>10465877

>> No.10465880
File: 140 KB, 640x856, 118660705_10159176137674057_3646616499065796591_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10465880

>>10465878

>> No.10465882
File: 106 KB, 640x853, 118372667_10160351980857782_8324721318915268279_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10465882

>>10465880

>> No.10465883
File: 110 KB, 640x853, 118652256_3767731469907158_4844388975720080679_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10465883

>>10465882

>> No.10465884
File: 107 KB, 843x843, 118356782_3197193010370080_3895982722367032692_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10465884

>>10465883

>> No.10465886
File: 81 KB, 640x853, 118386177_10156977834645666_7281317549397275050_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10465886

>>10465884

>> No.10465887
File: 291 KB, 843x843, 118730848_10103798242897950_8675479931751912029_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10465887

>>10465886

>> No.10465888

oof most of this coords make me remember why we had no COF thread for a while

>> No.10465889
File: 110 KB, 640x853, 118763002_2761306897422054_6269324537201495602_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10465889

>>10465887

>> No.10465890
File: 114 KB, 843x843, 118579623_1025494651236964_8568952657673823681_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10465890

>>10465889

>> No.10465891

Why even bother posting cof coords? They're just depressing

>> No.10465892
File: 57 KB, 480x853, 118496891_1516838125171945_8371409640297753015_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10465892

>>10465890

>> No.10465893
File: 103 KB, 600x871, 118729409_3333754756671931_6705088061687620587_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10465893

>>10465892

>> No.10465895
File: 26 KB, 569x657, 118705976_1247642212254458_4035673766251969819_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10465895

>>10465893
ending dump, will update as more get posted

>> No.10465897

>>10465892
This looks cute but why couldn't she bother to take a pic where she's fully in the frame? Lazy.

>> No.10465898

>>10465897
you mean middle of frame or are you that pressed about her one foot.

>> No.10465907

>>10465878
what is this stereotype called? I'm-not-like-the-other-girls?

>> No.10465908

>>10465877
cute coord but that smile seems super forced

>> No.10465914

>>10465892
Looks awful without a blouse wish people would stop encouraging this

>> No.10465923

>>10465914

I live in a place that has been over 100 degrees F almost every day this summer and I always wear a blouse or cardigan in my coords (I wear lolita at least 4 times a week). The blouse and cardigan actually protect my skin from being straight up roasted by the sun (I'm black and even wear sunscreen but the clothing protects my skin more).

Seeing people who live in places that do commonly have AC whine about lolita in summer at 75-80 degree F temperatures and use it as an excuse for no blouse annoy me. If you want to go blouseless just wear an OP or wear something early lolita or old school inspired with an ETC or brand cami and skirt or even a short sleeved cutsew and skirt with no petti so there are less layers of fabric, that will actually keep you more cool than a satiny or poly lined JSK directly on your skin.

This is just an annoying trend that needs to die if people aren't going to actually dress for comfort or be creative and are just removing the blouse from a coord for clout. They also don't have to wear lolita or call their outfit lolita if they really want to not have to wear a blouse. Just wear the shit but don't assume a brand coord or any half assed outfit aside from jeans and a tee is lolita.

>> No.10465939

>>10465884
I hate everything about this except the bows on the face, that's cute

>> No.10465947

>>10465923
>itsnotthatdeep.jpg

>> No.10465953

>>10465923
So you're acclimated to warmer temperatures and blame others for not reacting to temperatures the same way your body does?
I'm not saying all blouseless coords are fine, yes people should style them, but your way of dealing with heat isn't everyone's.

>> No.10465956

>>10465897
Shut up, I want more pics of her doggo

>> No.10465965

>>10465897
Really?

>> No.10465971
File: 79 KB, 960x960, FB_IMG_1598750361177.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10465971

Why

>> No.10465972

>>10465923
hmmm how about no?
If you dislike it, simply don't wear it. You're free to suffer however you like from the heat, but don't expect people to do the same just for your sake.

>> No.10465974

>>10465971
She said she was going to a Drag show.
Why do people have to mix the fashion with that?

>>10465923
u mad

>> No.10465975

>>10465892
I like it. It would look better with a shorter black necklace or choker-like accessory to fill-in the "cleavage". But still, very refreshing.

>>10465895
this is kinda creepy

>> No.10465976

>>10465953

I have lived in multiple places with varying climates and definitely wouldn't call myself acclimated to the heat (even locals living here forever know it's hotter than usual here)

I'm not mad people deal with heat differently. I just find the urge people gave to call non lolita coords lolita annoying. And I find the excuse of heat questionable in some cases (one girl wore a tanktop but old school otks in a blouseless coord who lives in the same place as me, and while I found the outfit cute...long thick socks are not gonna keep you cool. Blouseless coords are cool but just don't call them lolita coords? Or choose lolita appropriate things that don't need blouses like short sleeve OPs?

>> No.10465980

>>10465976
Chill out, sperg.

>> No.10465981

>>10465976
That makes no sense, anon. People DO deal differently with the heat. I live in a place where 120F is commonplace during summer, and I'm used to wearing pants and not feeling the heat. But a blouse? My body simply cannot deal with having the upper part covered during summer. I feel sick and overstuffed.

>Blouseless coords are cool but just don't call them lolita coords
Also, this sounds extremely stupid. Just check past threads and GLBs and you'll how many times brands, people and models have worn Lolita this way. It's not the blouse that defines this fashion, I thought that, at this point, it was common sense already.

>> No.10465983
File: 195 KB, 500x667, noblouse.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10465983

>>10465976
should we ban Jetj from our Lolita brands list?

>> No.10465986

>>10465892
People only like this because she's pretty and Asian the coord itself is boring and lacking elements

>> No.10465988

>>10465986
Stop projecting. Why do people get so salty over this girl? Last time someone complimented her they got accused of yellow fever and now we're back at it again with the racewank.
Go ahead and tell us what elements you think the coord is lacking.

>> No.10466001

>>10465877
so jealous of this art print wall- but I have that exact same symphonic bird Kira print poster~!

>> No.10466008

>>10465988
Nayrt, but ive never seen this girl before and agree this is a lackluster coord being simped on just because shes thin and asian. Its not a bad coord by any means, a few nitpicks here and there (the socks for me), but if this girl had any boob or even a little arm fat, this board would have a meltdown.

>> No.10466010

Gulls get salty any time a cute thin girl in lolita is posted and complimented lmao

>> No.10466020

>>10465981
VM and Jetj come to mind for brands that have a number of dresses that are styled to be worn blouseless or with a detachable yoke.

Even AP and Baby have been doing it. That said, some dresses are cut better for it. I think a square neckline with gloves works, but it would be improved with some kind of collar (detachable yoke or other)

>> No.10466021

>>10465895
she needs better undergarments, her boobs look squished and lopsided with the buttons

>> No.10466025

>>10465895
Dollsmeat skinwalker? That's an unexpected turn of events.

>> No.10466031

>>10465971
The absolute state of that sad-ass petticoat

>> No.10466035

>>10465893
This screams 80's North American ads for some reason.
I can even see her with an apron making dinner for her husband and plastering a fake smile.

>> No.10466036

>>10466008
A good coord also takes your own body shape into consideration like any other types of fashion. So this is a good albeit a little simple coord on her but not for fat-arms chans.

>> No.10466038

>>10465892
The fit of the jsk is weird, it's way too big for her. She should alter it or wear a corset over to hide that baggyness.
The socks are also an awkward length and look cheap. She should just go with longer ones or lace tights.
I really like her hairstyle with the bow though, very elegant and simple.

>> No.10466048

Cgl defends blouseless coords, wtf is happening

>> No.10466051

>>10466048
It can work
That doesn't mean it usually does

>> No.10466055

>>10466020
The main suggestion was that people wear blouseless things meant to be styled blouseless, not that every blouseless coord is ita.

>>10466048
Some look good but some are cringe and ended up in the ita thread for a reason. It all depends on how it is styled imo and some people do it well while others sre just wearing a brand dress but not an actual lolita coord.

>> No.10466121

>>10466048
basically global warming

>> No.10466122

>>10465971
what is she holding over her head ?

>> No.10466127

>>10465875
Something about this feel so cheap. When I first saw it I honestly thought it was that amazon dress. It might be because the of the cheap harp as the focal point of the image.

>> No.10466132

>>10466127
Because it's a dress made of bed sheet quality cotton poly blend

>> No.10466134

>>10466021
That's not a matter of undergarments, her bust is simply too big for the dress.

>> No.10466139

>>10466008
Is she being simped on on COF? Because I wouldn't call the comments here simping. Any compliment she got has only gotten criticism alongside it. And I don't see why it's a crime to dress for your body type.

>> No.10466164

>>10466122
She is holding the zzzzz sign behind her for effect

>> No.10466201

>>10465976
>>10466048
Blouseless coords are fairly common among Asian lolitas these days, when is the western comm finally gonna get over it? It's just a more casual, wearable coord.

>> No.10466207

>>10466201

A lot of things Asian lolitas can pull off are done in an ita way by westerners (and some Asian lolitas too)

Blouseless coords aren't inherently awful, they just need to still be well coorded like any coord with a blouse. Heat isn't an excuse to look sloppy. It's getting hot everywhere.

>> No.10466209

>>10466207
yellow fever

>> No.10466219

>>10466048
We have for a number of years now. Check the archive. We have had threads specifically for blouseless coordinates.

>> No.10466222

>>10466048
tryhard newfag

>> No.10466255

>>10466127
The dress is cheap, but it would look a lot better overall with nicer tights and if the headress wasn't all crumpled

>> No.10466261

>>10466207
Probably the main issue with westerners doing blouseless coords are their ham hock arms

>> No.10466267

>>10466209

It's not yellow fever to acknowledge that some westerners and Asians have worse fashion sense than others. Or that different body types are flattered by different styling. Shooped Chinese elf girls look just as ita as a fat westerner sausaged into a too small JSK. One is just more aesthetic.

>> No.10466280

>>10466209
>assblasted westerner
See how fun it is to make assumptions about people?

>> No.10466282

>>10465892
>>10465893
Am I the only one who always finds it a bit jarring seeing very conventionally attractive girls, outside of models, in lolita?

>> No.10466286

>>10466282
Both of these girls look good but normal though, definitely not model-tier.

>> No.10466297

>>10466286
So do most of the brand models

>> No.10466301

>>10466282
They're pretty but not model pretty imo. It would indeed be kinda weird to see a super gorgeous instagram egirl type in lolita, but I don't think that's ever happened.

>> No.10466306
File: 22 KB, 480x480, 118598313_3490232314354836_6082440131003758352_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10466306

>>10465895

>> No.10466309
File: 73 KB, 480x480, 118680829_700257077366100_1526494605090407960_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10466309

>>10466306

>> No.10466310
File: 28 KB, 456x350, 117905338_2044464022352731_6280538845637311284_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10466310

>>10466309

>> No.10466311
File: 24 KB, 280x420, 118702184_3280162178744377_1369649742717437544_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10466311

>>10466310

>> No.10466313
File: 23 KB, 320x427, 118695215_2013736042095564_213416006631364797_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10466313

>>10466311

>> No.10466314
File: 43 KB, 480x480, 118763973_10157894291412734_6904670649897756409_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10466314

>>10466313

>> No.10466315
File: 54 KB, 480x480, 118660497_10221650388742318_6660492843789572931_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10466315

>>10466314

>> No.10466317
File: 64 KB, 480x480, 118692495_10221878326494753_2564392249186707725_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10466317

>>10466315

>> No.10466318

>>10466314
Fgfhhfgh

>> No.10466319
File: 22 KB, 280x431, 118710899_10213578801864625_4008626123124794347_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10466319

>>10466317

>> No.10466323

>>10466164
I feel really stupid, it doesn't seem like a zzz to me, also why zzz is she sleeping ?

>> No.10466326

>>10466282
Not really but it makes me sad because I wish I looked as good as them

>> No.10466327

>>10466314
I hate her awkward ass Barbie poses

really wish she'd just stop posting

>> No.10466331
File: 500 KB, 500x282, dont.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10466331

>>10466314

>> No.10466356

>>10466314
This belongs in the ita and bad makeup thread. Those eyebrows will haunt me in my sleep

>> No.10466459

>>10466310
She always looks lovely

>> No.10466462

>>10466356
how is she getting worse? she's toned down the makeup but won't stop wearing ugly shit with the rest of the outfit.

>> No.10466613

>>10466306
this is a good amount of cute!

>> No.10466615

>>10466310
the back detail pic is just sooooo beautiful!!

>> No.10466636

>>10466314
She looks really cute here actually

>> No.10466637

>>10466326
Milkfemme kek

>> No.10466640

>>10466326
what does that mean?

>> No.10466642

>>10466640
She's saying she wishes she was as good as the conventially attractive lolitas?

>> No.10466647

>>10466642
kek ive done goofed i meant to reply to >>10466637 this

>> No.10466654

>>10466314
Honestly, this is the first coord of hers I don't hate. Yeah there's still some nitpicks, but it's not making me angry like her others do. I hope she continues to improve.

>> No.10466657

>>10466310
>>10466317
cute!

>> No.10466666

>>10466657
Omfg hahaha is that a *worksafe* plug? Ahahah

>> No.10466668 [DELETED] 

>>10466666
I just like classic lolita?

>> No.10466686 [DELETED] 

>>10466313
Omfg hahaha is that a *worksafe* plug? Ahahah kek ahahah *kek out loud* kek

>> No.10466696 [DELETED] 

>>10466647
Omfg hahaha is that a *worksafe* plug? Ahahah kek cx

>> No.10466708

>>10466666
>>10466686
>>10466696
Do you have schizophrenia or are you just a next-level tryhard?

>> No.10466928

>>10466323
Don’t feel stupid, this is just an awkward mess of an outfit sadly.
I think she is suppose to be dreaming going by the body colouring and the slippers she are wearing.

>> No.10466946

>>10466708
probably compensating for the embarassing time she insisted a shape on an AP print was oBVioUsLY a crystal ball and was then proven completely wrong

>> No.10467041

I took a very long break from checking CoF back in the OTT Classic era because I was sick of all the over the top costumey-ness and one upping.

Now I came back to see the group again and although it's a bit nicer to see more toned down regular coords, there is just so much itas, terrible coord choices, gross sneakers. Why

What happened?

>> No.10467091

>>10467041
I blame the rise of Lor making hideous and overweight people think lolita is the place for them.

>> No.10467100 [DELETED] 

>>10467091
I wish we could go back in time and encourage the train of thought that lolita is only wearable by super thin girls.

>> No.10467103

>>10467041
some people stopped posting there due to not liking being posted to /cgl/ or disagreements with the moderation. instagram is the place to go now.

>> No.10467105

>>10467091
considering that lolita has always been considered a fashion for ugly fat (well, asian fat) girls in japan, lor has nothing to do with it

>> No.10467277

>>10466314
The coord itself isn't that bad but the makeup and hair in combo with it give me heavy sissy vibes. Eugh.

>> No.10467304

>>10466462
>>10466314

My guess is she thinks she has to keep wearing weird crap to seem creative and stand out from the crowd.

It's kind of amazing. The end effect is as if she has a hitlist of the most repeated ita mistakes and she's trying to show off how ugly they are by photographing them in the most theatrical way possible. I'd almost believe this was some kind of social experiment if she didn't seem to earnest about posting her coords.

>> No.10467328

>>10466314
Makeup still looks cakey and personally I don't like how sharp the lip lining is, but honestly that's the biggest crime here. This is an improvement. Its not quite as draglike. Don't like the shoes or the straight cut bangs though. But credit where credit is due- this is a bit more lowkey than her usual stuff.

>> No.10467384

>>10467304
she's not wrong tho
I mean we discuss almost every one of her coords & she gets a ton of likes and engagement on her photos

>> No.10467403

>>10467304
She may enjoy making tacky accessories and not realize smaller ones are cuter. Notice she always has a huge handmade accessory or 10

>> No.10467474

>>10466314
how does she have money for the amount of brand dresses she has, but still not get some shoes that match the lolita aesthetic i dont understand. You can buy teaparties on aliexpress for like £20

>> No.10467511

>>10467474
Someone asked her about the shoes and she replied that she has a preference for high platforms and already has so many that she doesn’t want to buy something like that. But she may buy some red rocking horse shoes.

>> No.10467513

>>10467511
that's dumb. she's clearly just doing this for attention. she's not interested in looking nice, just looking weird.

>> No.10467552

>>10467384

Yeah, there's some folks who seem to dress more for the attention rather than the fashion, at least that would explain why her photos look overdone. It's not a route I would pick, you gotta be totally comfortable with people hate-discussing you and laughing at how desperate you appear, but whatever, I guess.

>>10467403

It's not the handmade. Those lace up platform shoes are practically an ita staple, and she's not making it look any less ita here either. Plus the bag that looks like a kid's bag, usually the sweets are way more careful with that kind of thing as it can sometimes take things into ageplay territory.

Like I said, it's really as if she has a list of common ita mistakes and is going through the list photographing them all.

>> No.10468778

>>10466025
She supposedly hates dm but copies her constantly. Her side account reeks of obsession

>> No.10468839

>>10468778
What’s her side account?

>> No.10468843

>>10465914
This coord looks amazing

>> No.10469044

>>10468839
@kiseki.1996

>> No.10469369

>>10469044
The cringe is real yet I can't look away.

>> No.10470876

>>10467041
My personal theory is that CoF used to be where you posted your best coords but since adding the "no concrit unless they specifically ask for it" rule itas and beginners have been feeling bold enough to post whatever they want.

>> No.10470889

>>10470876
Interesting theory but that rule hasn’t been there for years. It’s concrit unless you state not to

>> No.10472223
File: 121 KB, 960x960, 118599989_10159010196149101_7313358751495900639_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10472223

These threads are dead but part of me holds on to hope they'll come back. Too many new coords to post, so here's a dump with the selection criteria being "things I wanted to see larger photos of from the thumbnail page"

>> No.10472224
File: 115 KB, 660x960, 118691353_1504427926415012_5396960852065042073_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10472224

>>10472223

>> No.10472225
File: 62 KB, 824x960, 118764322_988051024974267_814626623314010057_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10472225

>>10472224

>> No.10472226
File: 100 KB, 667x960, 118824997_10213604246780732_5200223838122505524_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10472226

>>10472225

>> No.10472227
File: 99 KB, 960x756, 118833231_2048896885242778_6179786304329560918_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10472227

>>10472226

>> No.10472228
File: 150 KB, 960x960, 118881389_10164063087070484_3987291713262235795_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10472228

>>10472227

>> No.10472229
File: 126 KB, 960x960, 118967064_10157380057896696_2518716796670546904_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10472229

>>10472228

>> No.10472230
File: 114 KB, 960x960, 118993394_10216245395679883_3766604927438450707_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10472230

>>10472229

>> No.10472232
File: 100 KB, 720x959, 119030494_10164369967805226_4092482295775152213_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10472232

>>10472230

>> No.10472233
File: 122 KB, 960x960, 119060197_10223798728984735_2537059240137977817_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10472233

>>10472232

>> No.10472234
File: 81 KB, 720x960, 119068161_367393127983935_364767305036505715_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10472234

>>10472233

>> No.10472235
File: 177 KB, 960x960, 119075521_10225323945585859_2580296622018525118_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10472235

>>10472234

>> No.10472236
File: 198 KB, 768x960, 119107673_2076150499184348_1334173972356541756_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10472236

>>10472235

>> No.10472238
File: 72 KB, 960x960, 119117596_3517298308314903_6235018849283637092_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10472238

>>10472236

>> No.10472239
File: 224 KB, 960x960, 119136572_2768305309936659_5507480007461478656_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10472239

>>10472238

>> No.10472253

>>10472223
Is this three eyes-chan?
>>10472224
That bow ruins everything
>>10472225
I love those coords! Plain yet gorgeous.
>>10472226
Remove the cardigan and it would be nice
>>10472228
XVIII century prostitute - kei
>>10472232
She made her fattiness work, I'm impressed
>>10472235
White Nike sandals? W H Y???
>>10472238
Is this a bodyline skirt?
>>10472239
That's so summer-y! Love it

>> No.10472297

>>10472253
seethe

>> No.10472298

>>10472223
This couldn't be three eyes chan. Didn't she use that ugly mask before?

>> No.10472303

>>10472227
love it

>>10472229
what are these poses

>> No.10472305

>>10472239
has anyone else noticed that she looks like a skinnier pixyteri

>> No.10472311

>>10472223
I hate that I actually think this is kind of cute

>> No.10472314

>>10472311
you're a furry. sorry, it's terminal.

>> No.10472323
File: 6 KB, 225x225, download.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10472323

>>10467511
this is some dumblshit behaviour imo
Just buy some platform lolita shoes, they're also on ali

>> No.10472329

>>10467100
Make lolita skinny again!

>> No.10472337 [DELETED] 

>>10472223
So a black girl wearing a mask of a white fox with blue eyes. On top of cookie cutter Moitie coord. Trying to fit hard while trying very polarizing costume. So funny.

>> No.10472372

>>10472305
no

>> No.10472427

>>10472329
ok ana-chan

>> No.10472428

>>10467511
>>10472323
I hate her looks too, but iirc her exact reasoning was that she didn't have enough space to store more shoes so she didn't want to buy any lolita-specific shoes

>> No.10472429

>>10472228
does this girl have an insta? I love all her looks

>> No.10472430

>>10472428
so?

>> No.10472435

>>10472233
wow! she is so cute with those colors and looks so happy

>> No.10472444

>>10472329
Genuine question, why do you hate fat people?

>> No.10472537

>>10467100
I wish we could go back in time and encourage the train of thought that lolita is only wearable by asian girls and not white chicks with eating disorders.

>> No.10472540

>>10472444
Skinny girls look better and sexier in lolita, which is kind of the point.

>> No.10472542

>>10472540
>sexier
what are you doing in this thread, scrote?

>> No.10472547

>>10472223
If you think about it, furry suits are like PPE if you properly mask up under it.
Furries will outlast us all

>> No.10472709

>>10472429
@littledoeplaysintraffic

>> No.10472715

>>10472298
It’s her new mask that she had been waiting for

>> No.10472766

>>10472715
The new one is ugly too.

>> No.10472781

>>10472223
>bangs cut directly to hang in third eye.
I know it's a fur head but my eyes are watering just looking at it. Also, she should go for something like the Beth rabbit, a more realistic looking partial and some gloves. The wide neck looks bad and you can't fit a necklace on this. It would really benefit from a choker or something.

>>10472540
Dollars to doughnuts this is that pol scrote

>> No.10472819

>>10472781
Not scrote. Just a sexy gay lesblita.

>> No.10472825

>>10472781
Apparently three eyes chan already has a realistic type head, but it's extremely ugly.

>> No.10472841

>>10472228
This screams YA novel romance cover that borderlines smut content.

>> No.10473376
File: 52 KB, 444x287, 1586029143491.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10473376

>>10472540
>sexier

>> No.10473377

>>10472841
is it the mask?

>> No.10473378

>>10472819
>larper

>> No.10473457

>>10473377
Yes, and paired with these lace gloves and the super thin strap of the dress... I cannot seem to be able to un-see that now.

>> No.10473793

>>10473378
Probably not, I know at least 5 predatory lesbian lolitas who say weird shit to girls to get them to like them. I bet this is the same anon who likes buying the dresses of that girl she’s obsessed with despite her being straight

>> No.10473797

>>10473793
Sure you do anon

>> No.10473914

>>10473797
I am a predatory lesbian, watch out.

>> No.10473983

lesbians don't call themselves "sexy gay lesblitas"

>> No.10473994

>>10473797
Sorry you haven’t had to deal with it I guess? I’m a lesbian who has had multiple girls shoving their weird sweet lolita girlfriend fantasy down my throat because they latch onto the nearest poofy gay thing they can and assume that because i’m a lesbian and like the same fashion as them that it automatically makes us compatible. I even had one of these girls vendetta posting me for a while because I wouldn’t date her

>> No.10473995

>>10473983
Yes we do

>> No.10474004

>>10473995
i will now.

>> No.10474006 [DELETED] 

>>10473994
I know who you are :)

>> No.10474009

>>10474006
ntayrt
is this threatening or friendly I cannot tell . . .

>> No.10474011 [DELETED] 

>>10474009
Neither. I'm just fucking around (although I'm p sure I do know who u r).

>> No.10474012 [DELETED] 

>>10474011
Oops youre not the anon. You get what I mean tho

>> No.10474032

>>10474012
kek ya I got it