[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/cgl/ - Cosplay & EGL


View post   

File: 78 KB, 600x627, DjPbnXPUUAEXk5x.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10402129 No.10402129 [Reply] [Original]

How much underskirt is too much? Here are some coords to ponder.

>> No.10402130
File: 95 KB, 1080x1350, 81496838_127864438319143_6879306002141059348_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10402130

>>10402129

>> No.10402131
File: 115 KB, 768x1024, EKncFJyUwAE4LKp.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10402131

>>10402130

>> No.10402132
File: 351 KB, 1536x2048, EIHn9dPVUAEg3KV.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10402132

>>10402131

>> No.10402133
File: 127 KB, 690x1034, D0-ABiNU8AA3G-g.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10402133

>>10402132

>> No.10402134
File: 331 KB, 1024x1366, DtkU1HrXgAABis9.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10402134

>>10402133

>> No.10402136
File: 98 KB, 640x800, 28765449_423976034706293_1700529409645084672_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10402136

>>10402134

>> No.10402138
File: 147 KB, 640x800, 28157426_2037958843124157_125555260000305152_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10402138

>>10402136

>> No.10402139
File: 86 KB, 640x640, 18947634_274947872970807_8581796539507146752_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10402139

>>10402138

>> No.10402142
File: 129 KB, 640x640, 32321760_2084507641817495_9002136604990504960_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10402142

>>10402139

>> No.10402145
File: 187 KB, 1080x1080, 39316613_703670219967753_805154828668895232_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10402145

>>10402142

>> No.10402147
File: 178 KB, 675x1200, CsslYIbUAAAtihI.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10402147

>>10402145

>> No.10402149
File: 120 KB, 1000x1500, DlrstqNUcAAySUV.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10402149

>>10402147

>> No.10402152
File: 555 KB, 1366x2048, EQkKz4TUwAAbxql.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10402152

>>10402149

>> No.10402156
File: 228 KB, 941x1456, EIIwMPAUcAERaRC.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10402156

>>10402152

>> No.10402159
File: 295 KB, 1500x1498, EJEtKibU4AA7TQ5.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10402159

>>10402156

>> No.10402163
File: 122 KB, 575x1024, Ddns8QtVQAENfSn.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10402163

>>10402159

>> No.10402165
File: 1.65 MB, 1080x1352, 23823455_197079870860651_2853617339939684352_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10402165

>>10402163

>> No.10402169
File: 560 KB, 1536x2048, D0FQv9OV4AAYPYy.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10402169

>>10402165

>> No.10402170
File: 368 KB, 1152x2048, D2RpdMCUYAIL2dx.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10402170

>>10402169

>> No.10402172
File: 119 KB, 690x1119, D_Q_JEmUcAA8nbY.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10402172

>>10402170

>> No.10402176
File: 561 KB, 1152x2048, DqrngqvUwAE84_K.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10402176

>>10402172

>> No.10402177
File: 113 KB, 1080x1350, 44836736_1998804646899522_5454912423784304530_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10402177

>>10402176

>> No.10402180
File: 257 KB, 682x1024, EOkXPj9UcAIO7aI.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10402180

>>10402177

>> No.10402182
File: 161 KB, 750x1035, o1038143314488008109.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10402182

>>10402180

>> No.10402183

>>10402129
Underskirts are always ugly. Every single coord in this thread would be improved by removing them.

>> No.10402184
File: 423 KB, 2048x1436, ETiX-onVAAA7XnI.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10402184

>>10402182

>> No.10402187
File: 88 KB, 640x760, 29094060_443935006062315_2162474668705972224_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10402187

>>10402184
>>10402183
How many layers (real or faux) are acceptable in an official brand release?

>> No.10402188
File: 115 KB, 853x1280, D9_bz8YUEAAMclS.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10402188

>>10402187

>> No.10402189

>>10402183
I think they're ok if it's one or two layers of ruffle but any more where it's very obvious is tacky

>> No.10402191
File: 325 KB, 1280x1920, D_wginQUEAAirs3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10402191

>>10402188

>>10402189
That sounds reasonable

>> No.10402196
File: 259 KB, 1024x1536, ERBrRzYUcAABuPP.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10402196

>>10402191

>> No.10402198
File: 85 KB, 918x918, 53064308_586448268488617_3136151816662671458_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10402198

>>10402196

>> No.10402200
File: 799 KB, 1092x2048, DxVaf7BV4AA81JQ.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10402200

>>10402198

>> No.10402201
File: 335 KB, 2048x2048, D8LqkmnUIAAmPCj.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10402201

>>10402200

>> No.10402202

>>10402131
>>10402134
>>10402142
i think these ones look nice. the OTT pink one is kind of ridiculous but it works, i think the pop of color from the underskirts is cool. i think making sugary carnival actually work as a goth coord in the third one is an interesting idea too. a lot of the other ones just look incredibly unbalanced to me.

>>10402145
and this one has a weird af silhouette

>> No.10402203
File: 255 KB, 1080x1079, 82763509_556739751597319_9140518405732467483_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10402203

>>10402201

>> No.10402204
File: 435 KB, 1536x2048, D_paMOcU4AEyWIA.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10402204

>>10402203

>> No.10402205
File: 213 KB, 1242x1618, EKC4fo0U0AAvhdM.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10402205

>>10402204
>>10402202
I think the silhouette is the most important consideration.

>> No.10402207

>>10402187
>>10402189
I just think it's always obvious that it's not part of the dress, and 9 times out of 10 creates a lampshade silhouette. That said I'm totally not into the OTT classic style or $1000+ brand monstrosities that usually do underskirts, but I think it looks even worse when tacked onto regular coords.

>> No.10402208
File: 459 KB, 1152x2048, EL-9RIxVAAASIGt.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10402208

>>10402205

>> No.10402209
File: 390 KB, 1354x2048, EKK_ocNW4AAM9gc.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10402209

>>10402208

>> No.10402213
File: 182 KB, 1080x1080, 24126971_885865091564429_6275268001973403648_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10402213

>>10402209

>> No.10402214

>>10402201
This is the only good look in the entire thread. Now I understand the memes about underskirts on Weibo.

>> No.10402219

I think it needs to match the coord, which it usually doesn't. Examples:

>>10402134
This underskirt has lots of ruffles and looks fine to me because the rest of the coord, even the parasol, has lots of ruffles too.

>>10402170
This one has no ruffles on the rest of the coord, so the underskirt is plain to match.

>>10402177
>>10402205
>>10402201
These have an underskirt with ruffles, but
the skirt of the dress is more flat. I don't like the contrast because the ruffles draw my eye away from their faces and towards their feet.

>> No.10402271

It depends on how well it blends in with the overall outfit. If you barely notice the underskirt you did it right.
I really dislike a huge block if nothingness at the end of dress, it just looks unbalanced to me.

>>10402129
>>10402130
>>10402132
>>10402152
>>10402165
Are prime examples of how to do it not.

>>10402131
>>10402134
>>10402170
>>10402172
>>10402182
>>10402209
>>10402213
This on the other hand look aesthetically pleasing and well balanced. Also, like the other anon said: silhouette is the key.

It saddens me to see when the dress has the typical lolita volume but the underskirt underneath is flat, it almost looks like extended bloomers in a weird way.

Wearing underskirts is not that difficult if you keep that in mind but apparently it also seems to be a matter of taste too, as you can see. Some anons like combinations with dresses/skirts I would say don't look right.

>> No.10402295

Underskirts universally look awful on dresses designed to be short. Nothing is more ugly than someone trying to shoehorn an underskirt into an OTT sweet dress from 2009

>> No.10402328

>>10402214
A lot of Chinese lolitas think that having an underskirt = makes the coord more gown-like = more elegant or princessy.
Imo it does the opposite and breaks up the coord, making it look choppy and unbalanced instead.

>> No.10402333
File: 17 KB, 466x515, 61Ja4JCFSCL._AC_SX466_.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10402333

>> No.10402372

>>10402138
is this shooped? The proportions look unnatural

>> No.10402377
File: 2.31 MB, 1226x1089, 1589230222273.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10402377

>>10402134
>>10402159
>>10402182
>>10402184
>>10402187
>>10402201
>>10402208
>>10402209
>>10402213
i don't hate these

>>10402142
this would have looked nicer if she had just worn the underskirt and left the sweet garbage off completely.

>> No.10402385
File: 85 KB, 1000x800, FB_IMG_1590615131266.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10402385

>> No.10402496

>>10402372
it's from a 90's shoujo anime

>> No.10402498

>>10402385
can't see how it flows while they're sitting

>> No.10402550

>>10402129
Almost everything in this thread looks completely retarded. A lot of these coords are cute, but ruined by the underskirt.

>> No.10402555

Damn bitch pull up your petticoat

>> No.10402565

Is this like a very specific ita thread or do people seriously like this?

>> No.10402567

I....I didn't even know this was a thing people did.

>> No.10402637

>>10402130
this makes it look like she's launching off into space

>> No.10402656

Most people don't get that they have to wear longer petticoats with underskirts. Also not every dress works with an underskirt, especially not sturdier cotton dresses.
What' so hard about that?

>> No.10402673
File: 1.07 MB, 1440x958, orbit.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10402673

>>10402637
she's actually in orbit right now

>> No.10402694

>>10402555
>>10402565
>>10402567
Who are you responding to

>> No.10402702

>>10402213
That bonnet reminds me of a hissing lizard's neck frills

>> No.10402741

>>10402673
thank you for this artwork

>> No.10402855

>>10402694
This thread dumbass.

>> No.10406582

>>10402129
If you can move, you need another layer

>> No.10411189

>How much underskirt?
Yes

>> No.10411195

>>10402138
Slenderloli?