[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/cgl/ - Cosplay & EGL


View post   

File: 84 KB, 640x960, 48414982_1240984849372573_2937283444599685120_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10162944 No.10162944 [Reply] [Original]

Let's get this going, I have a couple to start with.

>> No.10162946
File: 391 KB, 1200x1600, D5v2zJXWAAAcyRA.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10162946

>>10158436

old saging thread here

>>10158436

>> No.10162950
File: 218 KB, 960x960, 1556914816484.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10162950

>> No.10162953

>>10162950
Oh that poor dress...

>> No.10162954

>>10162946
did she just roll through bodyline and amazon clearance or something?

>> No.10162965 [DELETED] 
File: 229 KB, 1536x2128, D5A92C3F-ABA6-40F6-87B5-3D77401BF99A.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10162965

Handmade disaster and a replica, I can’t wait to see how she coords it.

>> No.10162967
File: 229 KB, 1536x2128, 94A6952A-1FF4-4853-918D-7B60DE449007.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10162967

Handmade disaster and parody-replica print, can’t wait to see her coord.

>> No.10162984

>>10162967
My eyes feel violated. I'll #metoo you anon

>> No.10162993
File: 111 KB, 960x960, 59773944_658264957951222_4784469567743197184_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10162993

based "wearing a set with a t-shirt as a blouse" coord

>> No.10162999

>>10162993
too much titty for lolita

>> No.10163001 [DELETED] 

>>10162999
Too much fat for lolita desu

>> No.10163013

>>10162967
It's not a replica print, it's a "parody" print. It says "Angelic Derpy" and the horses have derp faces.

>> No.10163016

>>10163013
>parody-replica print
>It's not a replica print, it's a "parody" print
what is reading comprehension anyway?

>> No.10163018

>>10163016
My bad, my brain completely skipped over the word "parody."
>Makes derp horse face

>> No.10163022

>>10162967
Anon that's an old meme from cgl..

>> No.10163031

>>10162967
Ancient meme.

>> No.10163042 [DELETED] 

>>10162993

MIKLY MILKY WARM AND TASTY!

MOMMY! MILKY! PLEASE BE HASTY!

REFRESHING DRINK FROM MOMMY'S UDDERS!

I WANT MOMMY'S AND NO OTHER'S!

GIVE IT! GIVE IT! GIVE IT NOW!

GIVE ME MILKY, LAZY SOW!

UNTIL YOU DO I'LL SCREAM I'LL SHOUT!

I'LL CRY I'LL WHINE AND STOMP ABOUT!

UNTIL MY BELLY IS FULL AND HAPPY!

I REFUSE TO TAKE A NAPPY!

>> No.10163043

>>10162993
The fat doesn't bother me. The tee shirt and the limp greasy hair and the cleavage bother me. Cleavage would bother me on a slender person.

>> No.10163055

>>10163042

how do I delete someone else's post

>> No.10163060

>>10162967
This makes me laugh desu

>> No.10163128
File: 518 KB, 2048x1337, 1395731703593.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10163128

>>10162967
>>10162984
>not knowing derpy-chan
newfags

>> No.10163129
File: 51 KB, 450x600, 1533411555618.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10163129

>>10163042
this is a bad post and you should feel bad about it.

>> No.10163133

>>10162950
The fact that I'm almost certain she's wearing a bra makes this THAT much more sad....

>> No.10163134

>>10162993
WASH. YOUR. FUCKING. HAIR.

>> No.10163139

>>10163042
>>>/r9k/

>> No.10163160
File: 259 KB, 1000x1000, 1555884313961.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10163160

>>10163042
back to your fucking containment board NOW

>> No.10163200
File: 117 KB, 1080x1080, 1557013011905.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10163200

Another sissy found this on ig tagged as fatgueerfemme wearing lolita.

>> No.10163203
File: 147 KB, 900x900, 1557012772676.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10163203

>>10163200

>> No.10163205

>>10163203
>>10163200
nice b8 m8 i rate it 8/8

she's posted a lot in these threads, she's biologically female just with PCOS or something most likely.

>> No.10163221

>>10163205
Was no bait it is the first time she showed up on my ig, i saw her here some times and allways thought it is a guy

>> No.10163226
File: 161 KB, 1440x1440, 59163376_10161906795305226_8462837859647225856_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10163226

>> No.10163227

This looks so dumb

>> No.10163229
File: 162 KB, 960x960, 1556807523012.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10163229

>>10163227
Dropped pic

>> No.10163230
File: 74 KB, 609x602, lacemarketwtf.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10163230

$190....

>> No.10163231
File: 44 KB, 500x291, 1542031318361.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10163231

>>10163227
ur dumb and ur dump sux. both these pics have already been discussed on the board.

>>10163230
pre sure this was posted a few threads back also

>> No.10163237

>>10163203
she looks so much better when she smiles, she should do it in photos more often.

>> No.10163238

>>10163226
this is a nitpick at best...vendetta post?

>> No.10163239 [DELETED] 

You sound underage.

>> No.10163241

>>10163231
I've been following the threads, and I haven't seen this yet (card captor), but I could have missed one picture

>> No.10163242

>>10163231
You sound underage.

>> No.10163245
File: 122 KB, 500x613, shit-the-fuck-up-mimostn-2-weeks-ago-shut-the-8375838.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10163245

>>10163242
Lmao I saw you delete your screw up. At least I know how to respond to posts properly

>> No.10163246

>>10163229
I hated this from the moment I saw it. Blouseless Lolita is bad and they should feel bad

>> No.10163254

>>10163230
Is our queen kk back? It looks like one of her designer dresses looool

>> No.10163255

>>10163200
Does she have an undercut or sidecut? She should better get bangs instead

>> No.10163258

>>10163254
Sadly not

>> No.10163276

>>10163226
The only ita thing here is that drag queen's makeup

>> No.10163278

>>10163013
Two options:
>kill it before it breeds
>Hans, get the flammenwerfer

>> No.10163279

>>10163200
Imagine how strong the zippers on those boots are.

>>10163276
The handmade little old fat man was asking about incorporating Lolita into drag on rufflechat the other day. People were actually catering to his fetish, couldn't block him fast enough, ugh.

>> No.10163280

>>10163128
It may be an old meme, but the fact that there is now a fabric, and someone has taken that fabric and made a garment out of it, is a recent development. I remember someone asking about it on the lolita sewing FB page. I didn't think they would really do it.

>> No.10163281

>>10163280
It may be belated, but I appreciate it. I imagine the people hating on it weren't around when derpy chan was a thing.

>>10163279
drag is not a fetish, you silly little troll

>> No.10163293

>>10163280
Is the fabric really new? I remember it being on Spoonflower years ago, though I’m not sure if anyone ever made something out of it. The Spoonflower proceeds were supposed to go to some charity.

>> No.10163294

>>10163281
>drag is not a fetish

Nayrt but honestly it always comes off as one to me. It’s disrespectful and a bunch of gay men mocking women.

>> No.10163299

>>10163294
>bunch of gay men mocking women
That’s not exactly a fetish but I completely agree that drag is for assholes.

>> No.10163300

>>10163293
The fabric has been there, but this is the first time I've seen someone make something out of it.

>> No.10163305

>>10163300
I looked at the patters last night and theres some chiffons and other fabrics.
Im sorely tempted now.

>> No.10163307
File: 1.42 MB, 1080x1352, erikaklash_1___Bd8dByAAXdh___.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10163307

>> No.10163309

>>10163294
I don't wanna open this can of worms but uh.. I'm surprised an appreciator of a fashion as ridiculous as lolita can't find the humour in exaggerated femininity.

>> No.10163313

>>10163307
Christ at least its a replica...

>> No.10163315

>>10163309
Because the fashion is supposed to seriously exaggerate femininity and show it can exist without being sexualized, drag pretty much does the exact opposite by making femininity a joke and hypersexualizing it. You should educate yourself on the fashion.

>> No.10163316

>>10163309
Are you really surprised? Cgl is full of normie bitches who ignore the fashion's beginnings and roleplay as princesses

>> No.10163317

>>10163316
>implying all VK is drag

Wew

>> No.10163319

>>10163317
I never even mentioned VK

>> No.10163320

>>10163316
>NORMIES? On MY /cgl/?

While I agree the board is being infested with FB and tumblr, you’re probably mentally retarded if you can’t see how fashions evolve over time. Now it is used as an expression of hyper femininity (usually) minus the sexuality and has been for roughly two decades, so it’s not like it’s a recent trend.

>>10163319
Do... you not know that lolita has origins in VK? And you’re talking about ignoring the fashions beginnings? Larper detected.

>> No.10163321
File: 273 KB, 540x663, yey.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10163321

>>10163315
I guess I just don't take lolita (or myself) as seriously as you

>> No.10163322

>>10163321
This really isn’t the place for you if you don’t take it seriously. Most people here take it so seriously that we don’t have a single thread that doesn’t devolve into arguments about it.

>> No.10163323

>>10163322
oh dw I love to sit back and watch you frilly clowns make fools of yourselves for my own entertainment~ * ~

>> No.10163325

>>10163323
You must be 18 or older to use this website, does your mom know you’re on here? Shouldn’t you be finishing up your homework? You want to pass the 7th grade, don’t you?

>> No.10163329

>>10163325
god, you're just so obnoxiously unlikeable. no wonder you dont want other people to have fun.

>> No.10163331

>>10163329
>doesn’t deny being underage

M O D S
O
D
S D O M

>> No.10163345

Liking drag current day is normie-tier, so stop arguing and post itas.

>> No.10163354

>>10162946
>Normie makeup
>Ratty cosplay wig
>Spreepicky socks
>Those fucking booties

Holy shit she needs to start over

>> No.10163358

>>10163307
shrunken head kei?

>> No.10163364

>>10163309
I can’t speak for that anon but for me there’s plenty of humor in exaggerated femininity, but coming from a bunch of men it’s just feels insulting. It’s like the difference between having someone you just met crack jokes about you verses friendly teasing from a person you’re close to.

>> No.10163371
File: 175 KB, 489x720, 5F533EF1-5DB6-4E97-B8BC-7B3D8027450C.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10163371

I’m all for experimentation but this is just itatastic to me, those patterns don’t even clash in a good way.

>> No.10163378

>>10163371
I agree that the tights look awful but otherwise I like this.

>> No.10163379
File: 2.23 MB, 4245x3000, 5D2A79B4-4F0E-4857-9499-1DFA28A6CDA9.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10163379

>>10163371
Had a feeling this was going to end up here, but I like it a lot. According to comments she’s going for the kind of bright colors and pattern mixing you see in Kimono Hime.

>> No.10163389

>>10163371
ah this is fun!
if i did have some feedback though I would of stuck with the same purple she has on her blouse with the tights, just finding ones with the same tone could really help bring the look together

>> No.10163391

>>10163229
Just put on a damn blouse and stop trying to be edgy, dear god.

>> No.10163393

>>10163229
I do think that some cuts of jsk can work as a blouseless look, but this just ain't it. Buy the OP.

>> No.10163395

>>10163391
This isn't even edgy...? You alright?

>> No.10163400
File: 182 KB, 1920x1920, 59901397_2509068999117839_2067100375822893056_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10163400

>> No.10163403
File: 104 KB, 960x960, 59337309_10161616637010231_7982354783002427392-1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10163403

>>10163400

>> No.10163406

>>10163400
is this a cryptid

>> No.10163407
File: 301 KB, 1440x1440, 59675296_2396448670569131_72433407971295232_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10163407

>>10163403

>> No.10163409

>>10163406
The girl thought is good enough for cof

>> No.10163412

>>10163403
This is pretty cute, the only thing I'd nitpick is maybe the balance of the hair accessories. Not ita.

>> No.10163414
File: 104 KB, 486x560, wa lolita.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10163414

>>10163371
I almost really like this, but what she's missing is that in >>10163379, all of the tights have a color that is repeated somewhere else prominently in the outfit or whatever you call a kimono. I do like that it's a busy pattern, but that light pastel blue ain't it. I'd like yellow tights that are the same as the yellow in the print, which would contrast the purple blouse.

>> No.10163420

>>10163379
i feel like her patterns aren't bold enough for it. soft florals and mismatched purples aren't giving the same effect as the pic you posted with its bold primary color designs.

>> No.10163445 [DELETED] 

>>10163406
>>10163409
>not knowing peacockfeather
you gave me a giid chuckle

>> No.10163456

>>10163406
>>10163409
>not knowing peacockfeather
you gave me a good chuckle

>> No.10163460

>>10163407
are you just posting because of her awkward face? The outfit is pretty simple and cute.

>> No.10163463

>>10162967
>when the newfags dont know derpy chan

>> No.10163501

>>10163403
This is adorable. I wish she had printed socks or tights instead of plain white, and I agree with >>10163412 about the hair accessories, but it's not ita.

>> No.10163503

>>10163407
Is this shooped? Her head looks a little too big for this body--it's almost uncanny valley.

>> No.10163512

>>10163280
Someone made the fabric a million fucking years ago when it was still relevant. That isn't new either. Probably just some newfag going through thread archives found out about it and decided to go for it.

>> No.10163585

>>10163322
>everyone else needs to take lolita as seriously as I do!! No exceptions!
It's fucking clothes, relax.

>> No.10163588

>>10163456
I not only know of peacockfeather I'm in her state, but you cannot deny the possibility of her being a cryptid

>> No.10163589

>>10163400
>All those CD's in the background
Kek, how old is this picture?

>>10163403
>>10163407
Not ita, what is wrong with you?

>> No.10163590

>>10163585
Fuck off newfag

>> No.10163594

>>10163590
You can call me whatever you want if it makes you feel better about being a tryhard douchbag.

>> No.10163603

>>10163371
This is bad in a good way. The coord has a fun, experimental feel to it. I can't hate this.

>> No.10163604

>>10163594
That’s a whole lot of projecting going on there in your post

>> No.10163611

>>10163229
I don’t get the hate boner for this. How is it any different than the way AP styled this dress in their ad when it came out? The coord overall isn’t even that bad and is pretty good for blouseless imo.

>>10163407
Nitpick? This is cute.

>> No.10163622

>>10163611
she looks like a playboy bunny

>> No.10163624

>>10163604
that's not what projection means. are you calling them a secret tryhard douchebag for liking drag?

>> No.10163626

>>10163624
Yes, and yes that is what projection means.

>> No.10163630

>>10163626
if you're actually saying that then your insult makes no sense and has no evidence to back it up.

>> No.10163634

>>10163626
how is liking drag and not taking lolita seriously tryhard projection

>> No.10163646

>>10163630
>>10163634

You must be new here, huh?

>> No.10163654

>>10163646
>deflection with a meme

>> No.10163655

>>10163654
>not knowing that saying something is deflection is deflection with a meme

So yes

>> No.10163661

>>10163655
>still not answering >>10163634
do explain

>> No.10163662

>>10163661
>not understanding

It’s difficult to explain to people who are mentally retarded and I’m not trained in special education so I’m not qualified to teach you :(

>> No.10163663

>>10163662
no, no. i insist. just try explaining how >>10163634 makes sense.

>> No.10163664

>>10163663
projection is just a dumb meme that isn't supposed to make sense, ignore them and stop shitting up the thread

>> No.10163665

>>10163663
Maybe ask your handler? That way you have someone who’s used to working with your level of complete retard to explain it to you.

>> No.10163666

>>10163665
yeah i figured you couldn't. it's okay, next time you can try an argument that does make sense instead of constantly refusing to justify nonsense

>> No.10163667

>>10163665
>>10163666
holy shit post itas or gtfo. no one cares

>> No.10163668

>>10163666
I’m sorry, I’m just not trained in handling speds

>> No.10163670

>>10163611
It looks stupid, strapless dress with tighs? Dumb as fuck

>> No.10163671

>>10163395
People who are blouseless think they're being edgylitas because they're "breaking the rules!!!"

>> No.10163672

>>10163403
Vendetta or ana-chan?

>> No.10163673

>>10163460
Simple and cute, but not lolita desu.

>> No.10163674

>>10163414
Am I the only one who thinks this is a nitpick?

>> No.10163675

>>10163674
They were using that as an example of it done right you absolute moron

>> No.10163681

>>10163371
I almost considered posting this, because it's a big eyesore, but I honestly don't think it's "ita". Don't get me wrong it's horrible, but really if she just changed the tights and the hat it's be passable. Not my thing, but not true ita.

>> No.10163683

>>10163681
Ita originally meant eyesore/so bad it was embarassing, so.

>> No.10163689

>>10163604
>>10163604
>everyone who doesn't obsess over lolita the same way that I do is a newfag!
you know all about projecting, honey.

>> No.10163702

>>10163371
This is lovely t b h.

>> No.10163738

>>10163675
Maybe they should use their big girl words and actually mention that, saying "pic related does it right imo," instead of only addressing the original pic and the kimono hime. Plenty of people on this thread add an ita photo right beside commenting on another pic so pull your bloomers out of your asscrack.

>> No.10163742

>>10163738
it was common sense, retard

>> No.10163747

>>10163738
Theres two types of people in the world. Those that can extrapolate information from incomplete data.

>> No.10163823

>>10163673
but...that is an Angelic Pretty cut sew I'm pretty sure

>> No.10163826 [DELETED] 

>>10163823
it is, it's Etoile Cutsew OP

>> No.10163850

>>10163323
Entertainment: you cheer on men who make a mockery of women and give them your time, attention, maybe money, watching rupaul's everything religiously and cheering for them on social media, inflating their follower numbers and creating more economic opportunities for them, blind to the fact it's a one way street and you and other female fans will never get anything out of it.

No woman's ever gotten that much attention or money, or has ever been considered "entertaining" or "hilarious" dressing up and lampooning a man because acting like a man is not looked down on. Drag, just the one way, is "funny" because of misogyny and internalized misogyny are "funny", and reproduces economic inequality.

>>10163371
It doesn't work because the print is traditionally a new year thing, and the styling and bag screams summer. There's a number of other reasons, including the tights not fitting colorwise.

>> No.10163853

>>10163407
Nitpick.

>> No.10163874

>>10163456
Who is she? Doesn't look like the regular lolcow she looks just stupid

>> No.10163875
File: 132 KB, 1193x2015, FB_IMG_1557130031220.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10163875

>> No.10163880

>>10163850
New year print? Isn't it a autumn print?

>> No.10163884

>>10163875
Gem gem??? Is that you

>> No.10163885

>>10163875
What is it with her and horns? Is she some kind of dragon/demon furry?

>> No.10163886

>>10163874
encyclopediadramatica.rs/Peacockfeather

>> No.10163909

>>10163886
I feel sorry for her desu her life must have been hard

>> No.10163913
File: 42 KB, 500x750, 59697873_2330171873926736_4131681839226028032_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10163913

>> No.10163917

>>10163875
Why does she cram herself into stuff that doesn't fit?

>> No.10163920

>>10163913
Was this tagged as lolita? PL does a lot of fairy kei and pastel kei, and under those categories this is cute.

>> No.10163925

>>10163913
I smell vendetta

>> No.10163943

>>10163920
The ita thread is for all j fashion that look bad

>> No.10163945

>>10163874
Once upon a time, we laughed at those on the internet who lacked self awareness to make us feel better about ourselves by comparison. Now it seems the trend is to obsess over e-thots and not realise that you become the true lolcow in the process

>>10163850
Whoah friend that's a whole lotta assumptions, half-truths and vitriol you're spitting. This is backwards ass radfem logic and I hope other people reading can see thru your bullshit and not get sucked in.

>> No.10163963

>>10163925
You clearly don’t know what vendetta means

>> No.10163964

>>10163738
>getting this upset about your lack of intelligence and ability to glean information

Sad.

>> No.10163975

>>10163913
Vendetta. I know this wasn’t tagged as lolita and it’s not bad for other jfash

>> No.10163976

>>10163975
But it is bad for other Jfash. Fucking hell pixie fans have the worst taste.

>> No.10163977

>>10163884
She's too thin to be gemgem

>> No.10163979

>>10163913
>
Her channel is straight up irrelevant at this point. I don't think anyone watches her anymore and she doesn't even post.

>> No.10163991

>>10163322
Lmao imagine being this much of a fucking loser that you take clothes this seriously

>> No.10163993

>>10163874
I mean, idk if i consider her a lolcow. She's just plain retarded without a handler and it's kind of sad.

>> No.10163994

>>10163991
Why are you even here m8

>> No.10163995

>>10163975
which jfash?

>>10163920
it's not even pastel, it's bright colors

>> No.10163997

>>10163991
ignore them, they're a tryhard projector

>> No.10164008

>>10163913
>>10163943
>>10163976
Nyart but this isn't bad for other jfash, and we've had have vendettaing against Ota-Q before, which is probably what this is really about. Sorry, not sorry that her brand took off and yours didn't.

>>10163995
>not even pastel
>pink
Uh.... not even sure how to respond.

>> No.10164011

>>10164008
magenta is not pastel pink, retard. you keeps saying "other jfash" but can't specify a style this fits into.

>> No.10164017

>>10164008
>being so retarded you don’t know what pastels are

This is just sad.

>> No.10164030

>>10164008
>vendettaing against Ota-Q
You mean people were making fun of a badly sewn, overpriced trash brand? Only weebs with very low standards would 1) buy from there and 2) be satisfied with their purchase.
>ur jus jelus!!1
lol oh honey

>>10164011
Probably "party-kei", the totally legit Japanse street fashion invented by a Canadian girl to describe whatever she felt like wearing that day. I don’t think even she remembers how she originally defined the style. She would've been better off naming it after herself, really (and not pretending it's Japanese).

>> No.10164032

>>10164011
It is her own style party kei, a horrible decora meets normie fashion style. It looks horrible as hell here esp. those shoes

>> No.10164043

>>10164030
>>10164032
I know it's party kei, I just wanted them to admit that they were purposefully skirting it as "other jfash" when it isn't categorized as jfash at all, and that outfit certainly isn't either.

>> No.10164046

>>10164043
Then it doesn't belong in this thread at all, wasn't tagged as anything, and that just makes the vendetta claims even more valid.

>> No.10164052

>>10164046
nope, she keeps calling party kei jfash when it's an abomination ita clusterfuck. perfectly valid to post here. funny how you changed your tune from "other jfash"

>> No.10164056

>>10164046
>being this desperate to protect that lolcow

>> No.10164058

>>10164052
I don't know if she technically calls it jfash but yes, it's a clusterfuck of actual styles and should be posted here.

>> No.10164064

>>10164058
She was a cute lolita I don't know what has gotten into her

>> No.10164069

>>10164064
too much food

>> No.10164077

>>10163323
>>10163585
>>10163991
roleplayers detected

>> No.10164080 [DELETED] 

>>10164056
>protect
get out of here, no one actually thinks that.

>> No.10164085

>>10163913
this is cute, I like it. What a cute looking pink apartment.

>> No.10164087 [DELETED] 

>>10162993
What a fat fucking cunt

>> No.10164109

>>10163945
>backwards ass radfem logic
Anon is certainly a lot more pissed about it than I am, but it’s really not that radical of a concept. Watch any crossdressing comedy ever and look at the logic behind the jokes. When men dress as women the jokes are usually them being good at it because it’s laughable to see a man be feminine. When women dress as men the jokes are almost exclusively based on the woman being bad at it because a woman could never be masculine without being too gross to get the obligatory love interest. It’s not like it’s something writers do on purpose, but it’s definitely a troupe.

Drag kings have never been as popular as drag queens because our society views hyper masculine traits as normal and hyper feminine traits as ridiculous.

>> No.10164124

>>10164080
just saying that doesn't make it true, sorry. It's clear you're a fan of her shit taste and it's clouding your judgement

>> No.10164126

>>10164109
the "joke" of drag isn't "HAHA MAN IS FEMININE" though. If it was, "realness" wouldn't be a thing and competitions to be the best entertainer would be based solely on how stupid they look. Drag as a style (as shown in RPDR) and drag as a sitcom joke where a man is just dressed as a woman clearly aren't the same thing.

And specifically, our society views MEN with feminine traits as abnormal. But women are allowed to have both masculine and feminine traits. If anything, the men are the ones being laughed at for shirking off expectations of masculinity.

>> No.10164130 [DELETED] 

>>10164124
I know this is going to be unfathomable for your little brain but I actually don't even know who she is and the post you replied to is the first of mine in the thread.
No one takes cgl seriously outside of cgl. You're not doing jack shit.

>> No.10164136

>>10163913
>>10163943
>>10163976
>>10163995
>>10164008
>>10164011
>>10164017
>>10164030
>>10164043
>>10164052
So, what we have here is:
>"ita" outfit posted to jfash board with no jfash tags or even in a jfash group on fb
>pink and lavender are NOT pastels
Dumbass
>repeatedly calling her a lolcow
>not jealous of successful American fairy/pastel kei brand
Yeah, right
>accusing the WKs of having shit taste

Obvious vendetta is obvious. Ree all you want about it, but post real itas when you do.

>> No.10164195

>>10164136
Jillian I am sorry you got posted, next time try to wear clothes that are actually cute

>> No.10164197

>>10164085
Is a hotel in Japan she went there for free after winning a kawaii fashion contest

>> No.10164198

>>10164136
that's not what a vendetta is, try harder. party kei is an ita made-up clusterfuck of jfash, not a real fashion. it, by her own admission, is a mixture of jfash.

and no, you fucking colorblind mongoloid, magenta is not a pastel color. All pinks are not pastel. The fact that this has to even be explained to you shows how absolutely retarded you are.

>> No.10164199

>>10164130
you don't even know who she is? jesus christ newfag, no wonder your opinion is so ill informed

>> No.10164200

>>10164198
I suspect is Jillian herself crying about us meanies, that bullied her out of lolita

>> No.10164207 [DELETED] 

>>10164136
Hey Jill. How about instead of bitching on /cgl/ you lose some weight? You’re obese now and it isn’t cute

>> No.10164218

>>10164199
>no wonder your opinion is so ill informed
On what exactly? I never really commented on the girl in question.

>> No.10164219 [DELETED] 

>>10164136
>mfw you’re treating that like all one person and I’m only two of the >s

First of all, her outfit is shit. Next again, NO, magenta is not “pastel” you literal retard. Thirdly, Jill is a massive lolcow and has been for ages. Nobody here is ~jealous~ of her either, unless they envy obesity and bad rainby hair. Anyone who likes Jill has shit taste, so naturally her WKs do too.

And finally, learn what vendetta actually means before spouting it. It looks like you quoted three or four people there based on how the conversation flowed.

>> No.10164232

>>10164008
>had no idea who or what Ota-Q was so look it up
>first thing I see is generic tumblr art and the model's huge stomach bursting out of her clothes
>tacky prints on basic clothing. None of the clothing itself is an original design it's all just prints
>everything is overpriced, especially since the quality looks so cheap
Jesus Christ what an eyesore. Is this "brand" actually successful? I don't think even weebs would waste money on this garbage when there's cheaper and (slightly) less tacky stuff out there.

>>10164136
I think whoever posted Jill was vendetta posting or at least trying to stir up drama since Jill doesn't even wear lolita or Jfasion anymore, but the outfit is still tacky and you whiteknighting this hard isn't gonna make her look any better.

>> No.10164235 [DELETED] 

>>10164232
Learn what vendetta means before using it please. So many newfags are misusing it lately.

>> No.10164244

>>10164219
>rainby hair
I attempted to Google but I didn't find a definition for this? What do you mean exactly?

>> No.10164245
File: 219 KB, 1440x1440, FB_IMG_1557183513925.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10164245

Less arguing more itas

>> No.10164252

>>10164077
You can keep thinking that if it makes you feel better about your unhealthy obsession.

>> No.10164255

>>10164218
saying "no one here thinks jill is being protected" when you didn't even know who she was or that she has followers. fucking dumb newfags

>> No.10164257

>>10164136
You quoted at least 3 separate people and are crying "vendetta"?

>> No.10164260

>>10164245
oof, this non-symmetrical photo craze is driving me up the wall.

>> No.10164263

>>10164195
>>10164198
>>10164207
>>10164219
>>10164232
The only crying happening over this is me from laughing so hard. I'm not Jill, just a gull who likes to call out bullshit. F-ing teenagers who have an issue with Jill should take it to the farm; it doesn't belong here. Just makes you look like stupid asses for misusing the thread. I never defended the outfit, just pointed out that this pic clearly doesn't belong here for a multitude of reasons (never because the outfit wasn't awful). And since no one in this thread ever said Ota-Q, it's interesting that >>10164232 knew exactly what brand to look up. So the hate boner is either for Jill or Ota-Q. But keep denying and reeing.

>> No.10164273

>>10164263
are you illiterate? people did say ota-q. holy fuck you're retarded
>>10164008
>>10164030

>> No.10164275

>>10164263
no one even cared about jill being posted until you rabid retards started trying to defend it as "not bad for jfash but not lolita". when we see bullshit, we're going to call it out

>> No.10164302

>>10164126
>joke isn’t man is being feminine
>joke is man not being masculine
Pick a side dude. You’re not even trying to take unconscious biases into account here. Of course drag isn’t a malicious industry that gets off on intentionally mocking women, but because of the inherent biases in our culture, humor based on feminine traits is almost always derogatory and a lot of people never even notice because it’s been so normalized. Even the “realness” is considered a feminine trait, associated with women and gay men being petty bitches.

>women are allowed to have masculine and feminine traits
Not really, women are expected to have the “right” balance of masculine and feminine traits. Too feminine and you’ll never be taken seriously, too masculine and you’re just a bitch. Femininity is considered lesser in both men and women which is shitty for everyone.

>> No.10164306

>>10164260
What? It’s a way to have two photos on the post that shows without swiping and makes the default insta square format. I don’t see what’s to hate about it.

>> No.10164307
File: 5 KB, 123x94, 22808035-67CB-4E7E-89E1-2F1E2F33A720.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10164307

>>10164244
Hmmm, what could rainby hair possibly mean? What a mystery.

>> No.10164316

>>10164302
i never said the "joke" was "man not being masculine". I said it was why they were looked down upon and hatecrimed for that shit. And no, realness is about appearance, not being petty. It has nothing to do with personality and everything to do with, literally, "looking real" AKA like a real woman.

>> No.10164368

>>10164245
wtf is up with the collar thing

>> No.10164376
File: 106 KB, 570x855, ita.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10164376

stop shitposting and post itas. this handmade thread on rufflechat is gold

>> No.10164380

>>10164245
Why the fuck would you wear a see through blouse with a skirt?? I don’t care if it’s 300 degrees celsius, that’s trashy.

>> No.10164388

>>10164380
Fat people are always trashy.

>> No.10164390

>>10164306
because when it's done well, there's no center-seam and the photos look aligned. it looks like cool surreal twin settings with a different pose in each. when it's done badly, well, see above

>> No.10164391
File: 100 KB, 720x960, FB_IMG_1557195626099.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10164391

Imagine this as representing your con's lolita quality

>> No.10164393

>>10164391
kek her face is so red it looks like she climbed a flight of stairs

>> No.10164396
File: 317 KB, 720x960, 59956754_10157242403627640_1710974954792550400_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10164396

>>10164376

>> No.10164397
File: 203 KB, 960x960, 59674565_1402018809938062_8934858532163944448_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10164397

>>10164396

>> No.10164402

>>10164396
2019 Ita Queen

>> No.10164405 [DELETED] 

>>10164391
>>10164396
Why bother with Lolita if you can't keep yourself at a normal size? Obese = ita

>> No.10164406 [DELETED] 

>>10163913
This little piggy went to the market

>> No.10164408
File: 708 KB, 1511x2015, FB_IMG_1557197094244.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10164408

>> No.10164409
File: 62 KB, 960x960, FB_IMG_1557197334765.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10164409

What is this shit

>> No.10164412
File: 125 KB, 720x960, 59705991_10211533180120066_7854189595930394624_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10164412

>>10164397

>> No.10164418

>>10164396
This pic was here many threads ago.

>>10164391
As a fellow fatty, it's really hard to do this and look half decent. But there are things she could be doing better (hair, makeup), and her body shape is unfortunate, which wouldn't be an issue if she lost some weight.

>>10164405
Nice bait, m8

>>10164406
Nitpick

>>10164409
Baby's first coord

>>10164412
Flamenco-kei

>> No.10164420

>>10164418
Oops, meant >>10164408 is the nitpick.

>> No.10164487 [DELETED] 

>>10164418
>As a fellow fatty

Ok ita-chan

>> No.10164495

>>10164376
grimes?

>> No.10164508
File: 159 KB, 721x475, style_10.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10164508

>>10163611
It is very different from AP in terms of balance. The weight and the use of color throughout the coord is off. If you section off the outfit and compare each area you can see how different it is. In addition to all of that her wig is messy, the makeup is sloppy and unflattering, her are accessories are light but the head is heavy and so on. Things like this can be done but normally you have to be on point with everything else.

>> No.10164514

>>10164508
the thing I hate most about this is that it's so freaking low on her chest. It looks like it's going to fall down any second.

>> No.10164542

>>10164391
it blows my mind how long shes been in this fashion and still looks like shit.

>> No.10164546

>>10163611

I think it's this >>10164508, pretty much. I feel like I'm just waiting for the dress to fall down only to be revealed there's a fatty manly chest behind that bustier.

The dress itself doesn't seem to fit her, length-wise. She's showing so much boob fat near her underarms because it's pulled down way too low. Then her actual boobs seems to be stuffed into the overbust area, and the dress' bust area is empty because it's at her underbust, so the dress is wrinkled. All the body bits are stuffed into the wrong areas of the dress, she's got her widest bits stuck in the narrow parts of the dress, and where she should be narrow the dress itself is trying to be wider. Basically making her look like a fatty lumpy tube.

I mean the model in >>10164508 seems less endowed and yet somehow all the lines and curves fit her just right so she at least looks like she has a woman's shape

A blouse would have hidden some of that underarm fat, and then you'd think she's only a bit chubs or just forgot to straighten her dress. A bolero or cardigan would've hidden the undarm fat and also hidden some of the bodice wrinkles.

I'm someone who thinks covering up your shoulder for lolita isn't necessary, but also I'm aware that it can look like this if you don't perfectly fit just right into particular dresses. People who want to do it should at least be more aware what they look like rather than "break all da rulezzz pearlclutching" kind of nonsense.

>> No.10164558

>>10164418
>This pic was here many threads ago.
oh wow please forgive me for not keeping up with every single ita thread and retaining what images were present there

she just posted it in rufflechat

>> No.10164562
File: 62 KB, 720x960, 59667789_694407004309647_4513843210270801920_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10164562

there is a perfectly good ita thread making itself right now

>> No.10164563

>>10164487
Nice b8

>> No.10164564

>>10164558
Someone is hangry. It's old news, just sayin.

>> No.10164565

>>10164409
Some weird shit

>> No.10164566
File: 188 KB, 1504x2016, 59526374_2060481197382713_8156239922710183936_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10164566

That room again, how can someone post that mess on fb

>> No.10164577

>>10164562
This looks like it could’ve been a lovely VM-style OP if it weren’t for that ugly trim and those bows, and maybe if the skirt were a bit fulller and longer.

>> No.10164593

>>10164546
There is so much unnecessary word vomit about fat bits that can't really be seen.

If you can see the outline of someones bones they're not fat.. jesus fucking christ.

>> No.10164596

>>10164566
Krushed petti kei with a strange looking bow. Why in the world people but those bows onto their heads?

>> No.10164598
File: 32 KB, 360x518, 1493990403378~01.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10164598

>> No.10164600
File: 192 KB, 1080x1350, lovelylor_1___Bvm9kZKleKp___.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10164600

>> No.10164601

>>10164600
I think this would be cute if the skirt sat lower on her. I wonder if there is a good way to extend the straps.

>> No.10164620

>>10164600
The outfit isn’t so bad, but wth is wrong with her face

>> No.10164726
File: 112 KB, 900x900, 85B06DCB-DDEC-4A0B-A684-B20D979FD9BD.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10164726

>> No.10164731
File: 380 KB, 1080x1350, B5762DBA-D0D5-4926-90BF-9678F582D23E.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10164731

>> No.10164737

>>10164508
Who actually cares this much about what someone else is wearing

>> No.10164746

>>10164726
What the fuck is wrong with her tits?

>> No.10164747
File: 342 KB, 588x476, su amused.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10164747

>>10164737
>not caring about what someone else is wearing
>in a lolita thread
Are you lost?

>> No.10164749

>>10164726
Unless the main piece has both pink and red, they look awful together. Plus this cut of dress is unflattering on her.

>>10164731
This is cute.

>> No.10164750

>>10164420
Nah anon. we have standards. that's a hot mess

>> No.10164751

>>10164409
she is such a tumblr fag

>> No.10164752 [DELETED] 

>>10164726
O honey. work on yourself and loose some weight.

>> No.10164753

>>10164593
People aren't calling her fat, they're saying her fat is sticking out. You can still HAVE boob fat flopping out without actually BEING obese. Everyone has fat

>> No.10164755

>>10164408
aside from the hair this seems ok. nitpick

>> No.10164758

>>10164620
It can get worse

>> No.10164761
File: 101 KB, 1080x1080, lovelylor_1___Bw-S5GSlRwc___.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10164761

>>10164758

>> No.10164762

>>10164747
Idk maybe she needed gloves but like imagine caring so much about a tiny nitpick you have to zoom in and compare her frame by frame to an ap model

>> No.10164770

>>10164566
Feck my room looks like that but I'd rather die than post it. Do itas have no shame?

>> No.10164773

>>10164726
When the bright red is color blocked like that it kind of makes it look like she's wearing a zentai suit under the JSK

>> No.10164786

>>10164773
>zentai suit under jsk
Well, that's never leaving my brain now. Thanks

>> No.10164828
File: 86 KB, 720x960, 59691593_10213865596650207_5738858975051382784_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10164828

>> No.10164835
File: 627 KB, 935x597, instagram.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10164835

>sweet lolita

>> No.10164836
File: 727 KB, 922x591, sweet lolita.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10164836

>>10164835

>> No.10164838

>>10164835
As a goth, we don't want this. You sweets can keep it

>> No.10164840

>>10164600
Shes so fucking ita and will continue to be forever.

>> No.10164841
File: 485 KB, 943x604, claires mirror selfie.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10164841

>> No.10164851

>>10164601
If she has already moved the buttons to the end then she could always get a button extender.

>> No.10164855
File: 419 KB, 479x601, instagram.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10164855

>> No.10164857
File: 623 KB, 818x604, instagram.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10164857

>> No.10164861
File: 441 KB, 938x608, instagram.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10164861

>>10164857

>> No.10164867 [DELETED] 

>>10164600
>shoes
Please lor stop being so painfully ita

>> No.10164869
File: 131 KB, 1080x1350, E1A948B9-8685-4834-8C86-AF98824EECAB.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10164869

>>10164726
holy shit it gets worse from the back what even is going on with that shitty normie v neck shirt????

>> No.10164872

>>10164869
Dat backfat.

>> No.10164881

>>10164861
Modelling classes? Wow, to think so highly of yourself or being a fucking easy mark.

>> No.10164882

>>10164869
>all those runs in her tights

Fucking hell.

>> No.10164888

>>10164882
That's the pattern

>> No.10164889

>>10164245
Ita aside, cute shoes. They're just normie shoes, right?

>> No.10164891 [DELETED] 

>>10164731
>wasting a sack dress as a fatty so you look like a gigantic walking bean bag chair
Why

>> No.10164892

>>10164888
The pattern has random horizontal lines over the vertical ones that vary in size and consistency? I think not

>> No.10164900

>>10164835
>>10164836
Goddamn wunderwelt liking literally anything posted with lolita tags.

>> No.10164918

>>10164855
Thanks god it is a replica

>> No.10164919

>>10164838
It brings us bad luck and we start missing out on our dream dresses, you dark creatures should keep it.

>> No.10164934

>>10164828
Barely a nitpick, a better pose would show off how cute this is. Or did you not know this is fine for casual lolita?

>> No.10164945

>>10164828
this seems casual and I think it's adorable

>> No.10164946

>>10164841
nitpick? she's just fat but I don't see much wrong with the coord other than it's a little short

>> No.10164948 [DELETED] 

>>10164855
lmfao i love how fat people can never style their hair so it always hangs down limp and greasy

>>10164892
she's stretching out the pattern because she's fat, but it's very clearly a vertical lined pattern

>> No.10164958

>>10164600
god that hair and makeup is fucking tragic
I swear to god she must be actively trying to look like shit

>>10164828
this doesn't really look like lolita. we've come full circle from livejournal days in that etsy-tier prints, converse and jackets are now jfash? ok but this literally looks like pin up/rockabilly except her hair's not nice enough

>> No.10164960

>>10164948
it's like, little horizontal slashes that are so feint in the low quality image I'm surprised that anon even noticed. must be scouring over the pic at 300% zoom

>> No.10164961

>>10164958
that hair makes her look like a witch with how unnaturally black it is. and with her face, she really doesn't need that comparison

>> No.10164963

>>10164960
i noticed it too, but I was able to recognize it as a pattern rather than haphazard runs. it's not that hard to miss if you just take a peek at her massive legs

>> No.10164966

>>10164963
There are actual runs in it on top of the pattern dumbass.

>> No.10164969

>>10164966
yeah neither me nor the other anon can see any so maybe you're just an autistic savant, good for you

>> No.10164970 [DELETED] 

>>10164966
The tights are just over streched on her land whale legs

>> No.10164972

>>10164946
It's a combination of the awful blurry photo, the dress not really fitting and also the cringey 'selfie at claire's'

>> No.10164975

>>10164969
Other people said they could see it, sorry you’re blind or retarded(probably both)

>> No.10164979

>>10164975
nayrt but you're retarded for getting so upset over socks lmao

>> No.10164984

>>10164979
>upset

Stop projecting

>> No.10164992
File: 1.44 MB, 400x300, 5710560666e31a7c7e67db5301241bc1.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10164992

>>10164984
Yes. What an accurate statement. I am so distraught right now, tears streaming down my face, clenching my fists because my feeble mind simply cannot comprehend your biting wit.

>> No.10164993

>>10164984
>slinging insults over stretched out tights on a fattie
>i-i'm not upset!

>> No.10164994

>>10164993
It’s been pretty tame for /cgl/. You sound new if you really don’t know that this is normal

>> No.10164995

>>10164992
if only you had seen the runs, anon. you complete buffoon. we could have been saved

>> No.10165005

>>10164828
>>10164841
these are nitpicks

>> No.10165017

>>10164994
I don't think that's what that comment implied at all..

>> No.10165020

>>10164731
nitpick. This was cute IRL. Saw her at SakuraCon. It fit her and looked nice.

Sure it's a shapeless sack dress, which looks bad on most everyone but she didn't try to shove herself into anything to clearly didnt fit

>> No.10165033

>>10163371
This woild be great if she had gone for solid tights, maybe yellow to match the skirt trim

>> No.10165035 [DELETED] 

>>10164919
Just because we're dark doesn't mean we want bad luck! It's already spread to Moitie with their recent quality issues and bad material choices, what if AtePi and Sheglit catch it too? No, we can't quarantine infectious itas like this any more. Maybe the classics can take her instead?

>> No.10165039

>>10164919
Just because we're dark doesn't mean we want bad luck! It's already spread to Moitie with their recent quality issues and bad material choices, what if AtePi and Sheglit catch it too? No, we can't quarantine itas like this any more. Maybe the classics will take pity on us and take this wretched thing off our hands?

>> No.10165057

>>10165039
Are you kidding? Victorian Maiden almost died! They can't take it. Let's shunt them off to party-kei or something.

>> No.10165077

>>10165039
I vote we give it to the was.They rarely look good.

>> No.10165081

>>10164600
Telephone skirt didn't deserve this

>> No.10165082

>>10164600
Oh my god was she telephone-chan?
>tfw I'd rather see Lor in this than pastel vomit

>> No.10165085

>>10165082
I had the same thought omg

>> No.10165098

>>10164600
I really appreciate this concept. It reminds me of Raggedy Anne. But that blouse looks kinda cheap and not flattering on her, and the makeup is just a bit cosumey rather than inspired.

>> No.10165104

>>10164600
Would it have killed her to re-lace the boots with red ribbon or something? It’s weird to see so much effort in the makeup and 0 effort in the ratty looking shoes.

>> No.10165105

>>10164892
I would love nothing more than to join you in expressing incredulity at how this cow of a human could wear such an ugly coord AND have runs in her tights, but legitimately she seems to have no runs in her tights. It’s just the pattern warping strangely over her very fat calves.

>> No.10165108

>>10164872
>Dat Backboob.
ftfy

>> No.10165118
File: 133 KB, 431x600, JoJo+Siwa+Nickelodeon+Halo+Awards+2017+EV0JmK7DiGul.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10165118

>>10164828
>
im sorry this is all i can see

>> No.10165124 [DELETED] 

>>10163229
Gross, looks like a dude

>>10163407
Nice


>>10164731
>>10164726
>>10162944
>>10162946
>>10162950
>>10162993
>>10163200
>>10163203
>>10163226
>>10163307
>>10163379
>>10163400
>>10163403
>>10163875
>>10164245
>>10164391
>>10164396
>>10164397
Please don't post fat whales. No one likes to see them.

>> No.10165138

>>10165124
fucking newfag that's the whole point of this thread, shit's ugly

>> No.10165140

>>10165082
no

>> No.10165144

>>10164869
she could have at least washed her gross dirty hair. $20 says this tubbo doesn’t shower daily which is a must at this size.....

>> No.10165164

>>10164412
This is just a nice church outfit.

>> No.10165212
File: 91 KB, 800x600, AC07C02C-B7D8-456C-96AF-FF34CB12F268.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10165212

>>10165124

>> No.10165217

>>10165082
no, shes had that for a while

>> No.10165218

>>10164869
she recently bought an AP op and I’m wondering how she thinks she’s going to fit into it without alterations.

>> No.10165219

>>10164596
Thats the headbow it actually comes with, you can thank bodyline for it.

>> No.10165221

>>10164841
Oh my god, that JSK is really roomy in the bust region and somehow this gal has managed to stretch it to max capacity. Oof. Oh no honey what is you doing?

>> No.10165236

>>10165081
She fits in at least

>> No.10165243
File: 67 KB, 960x720, 59335004_1389312071210389_755773480837840896_n-2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10165243

>> No.10165286

>>10165243
>Hello Kitty Cafe truck comes to my city.
>A group of girls calling themselves part of a maid cafe show up
>Not dressed in maid uniforms, just AliExpress Lolita
>Male "fan" of theirs shows up, cursing up a storm and being edgy to impress them
>Thinkofthechildren.jpg
Like clockwork

>> No.10165303

>>10164892
...where are you seeing horizontal lines?
I've got it fullsize on a monitor.

>> No.10165304

>>10165286
Why are loud disgusting itas always accompanied by that kind of guy??

>> No.10165331

>>10165218
Yea I seen that along with the creepy comments her bf was leaving on it. sad my comm is full of these freaks

>> No.10165369

>>10165286
>AliExpress Lolita
so jus taobao?

>> No.10165371 [DELETED] 

>>10165221
>Oh no honey what is you doing?
why are u using nggerstacy talk?

>> No.10165396

>>10165371
Shut up newfag crossboarder

>> No.10165399
File: 20 KB, 361x400, VTG-Kewpie-Dolls-Vinyl-Lot-12-7-Made-in.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10165399

>>10165396
jus testing nothing personel anon

the normie talk still annoys me but ill jus keep ignorin it

>> No.10165445
File: 204 KB, 1080x1350, lady.mercury___BxEwWiKFZmy___.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10165445

This lady tagged this pics aa sweetlolita no wonder people think we are perverts

>> No.10165447
File: 53 KB, 720x900, jujubakkr___BxBCaPZAmn____.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10165447

>>10165445

>> No.10165628
File: 44 KB, 540x960, FB_IMG_1557354284636.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10165628

WAT

>> No.10165631
File: 58 KB, 720x960, FB_IMG_1557354430989.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10165631

Here's some hidden lolz

>> No.10165635
File: 49 KB, 720x960, FB_IMG_1557354461819.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10165635

>>10165631
Same girl took a fedora and made a lolita headpiece

>> No.10165637
File: 53 KB, 720x960, FB_IMG_1557354441720.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10165637

>>10165635
Another one of this same idiot

>> No.10165641
File: 156 KB, 1280x960, FB_IMG_1557354453738.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10165641

>>10165637
Another of her

>> No.10165683
File: 173 KB, 750x739, E9A40B03-F5EB-4AF2-B0D2-03A0D07358EA.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10165683

people wk this girl sometimes and idk why because she looks as dirty if not dirtier than piercings-chan

>> No.10165684
File: 136 KB, 747x911, 525BB4E9-3A1D-45DB-88CC-0361621C3F9F.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10165684

>>10165683

Nostalgic ita, but posted recently.

>> No.10165792

>>10165683
Her dreads make me itch and look like they smell of sour pit juice

>> No.10165803

>>10165792
Why? Because goth dreads on a girl who isn’t black? These are synthetic and easily washed at the roots where oils build up, so there likely isn’t any smell if she keeps up with her hygiene.

She’s still ita though.

>> No.10165824
File: 57 KB, 720x960, 59937483_2673174276043499_2151413912443027456_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10165824

She goes like this at work at a tattoo place

>> No.10165826
File: 81 KB, 720x960, 60016136_2371575609831037_3197439762726125568_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10165826

I feel sorry for the comm this sissy might try to join, his profile is a goldmine for perverts

>> No.10165841

>>10165824
please condition your ends jesus fuck

>> No.10165857

>>10165824
I'm sure normies think she's ~so cute~. Her hair looks like brooms too.

>> No.10165942
File: 369 KB, 750x932, E6EB1A63-D61D-4D52-A43D-E05DA4F968FC.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10165942

this looks like a grandma tablecloth

>> No.10165943

>>10165824
I hate this trend of these socks. It’s so tacky.

>> No.10166123

is it time for a new thread yet

>> No.10166127

>>10165826
what’s with the weird gloves

>> No.10166129

>>10165331
Vomit. I just looked.

>> No.10166131

>>10165243
Y i k e s

>> No.10166133

>>10164861
>>10164857
>modeling classes
I’m sorry what? Does she really think she’ll ever model? Or that what she’s wearing is lolita..?

>> No.10166135

>>10164409
this is tacky and looks like poorly done fairy kei
>>10164412
mom kei

>> No.10166334

>>10165445
this definitely hurts my eyes.

>>10165447
oh come on salt-chan. you can't even see what she's wearing.

>>10165826
y i k e s

>> No.10166349

>>10165447
She looks like tuna melt-chan

>> No.10166422
File: 363 KB, 750x937, 9F5A25D0-D756-4018-923E-C073AB8009B1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10166422

>> No.10166427
File: 145 KB, 750x913, 5625BC40-6F7D-4620-88D9-14930528B8CD.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10166427

>>10166422

>> No.10166503

>>10165371
Aren’t you a delight? Racist and boring, what a combo.

>> No.10166504

>>10165803
Nayrt. Im not a fan of dreds on anyone but white people dreads always look way worse imo. Maybe it’s just because nasty hippies ruined them for me, but I agree they look like they reek.

>> No.10166539
File: 144 KB, 739x991, B9053FE7-7C1C-4E06-B025-A475EA8EA25B.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10166539

>>10166427

>> No.10166541
File: 161 KB, 750x693, 8874CD16-19F0-4411-8030-A2A9A572B126.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10166541

>>10166539

>> No.10166544
File: 217 KB, 655x924, A0F17365-E55A-44DA-957B-FE713F1124BD.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10166544

>>10166541

>> No.10166545
File: 323 KB, 750x931, C67860FE-35A3-4FC2-964D-B85EC5D417BE.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10166545

>>10166544
Why wouldn’t you just try to find the jsk and not the op....

>> No.10166546
File: 204 KB, 750x921, E6815B8A-7F87-4212-B9B7-E152C09D1C45.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10166546

>>10166545

>> No.10166547
File: 380 KB, 750x736, BFC90AA1-1166-4A8A-8C63-49ACB379EB0F.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10166547

>>10166546

>> No.10166644

>>10166547
I’m all kinds of confused

>> No.10166919

>>10165803
What the fuck does her skin have anything to do with it?
They look like unkempt grinch fingers.

>> No.10166960

>>10164762
Anon asked why people disliked it and they thought it looked like the AP model. It clearly does not and comparing why one works and one doesn't is helpful. Our memories get skewed sometimes.

>> No.10167157

>>10164869
The tits on her back are bigger than the ones on her chest

>> No.10167190

>>10167157
I would agree but her bust is cow-tit level ridiculous and huge.

>> No.10167894
File: 90 KB, 720x960, 7CE7B685-535B-4C24-BBD0-5EB7C2CDEF10.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10167894

>> No.10167915

we need a new thread

>> No.10167973

>>10167915
Then make one bitch

>> No.10168092

>>10166547
those socks are trying so hard.

>> No.10168093

>>10166539
classic cat ear itas. a good one is so hard to come by these days

>> No.10168095

>>10165635
what year did she do this?

>> No.10169315

>>10166539
This outfit really is good. Maybe a nitpick, but not bad at all.

>> No.10170620

>>10162993
Hot topic Chan Couldn't stop shoving her face with Cake Desu

>> No.10172710

>>10163379
So she's trying to look like shit?

>> No.10172720

>>10165164
Is this a joke?

>> No.10172722

>>10164508
AP made the model ita too, she had no hope

>> No.10172729

>>10165445
But that zip should be invisible, it looks like she glued it on. Whoever is responsible for this garment should be shot.
She is the gross kind of lolita

>> No.10172812

>>10172729
I agree