[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/cgl/ - Cosplay & EGL


View post   

>> No.10786688 [View]
File: 59 KB, 532x720, 19149124_1885072545081748_3071700775136266692_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10786688

>>10786660

>> No.10786693 [View]
File: 218 KB, 1023x1051, 433242.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10786693

>>10786678
Wrong. Black women are statistically the least desired by men by a large margin.

>> No.10786711 [View]

>>10786678
"femcels" exist but they're volcels. Yeah any woman could get sex but finding a man worth having a relationship with is much harder, the dating scene is a wreck for men and women right now so a lot of people are deciding it's not worth the effort.

>> No.10786712 [View]

>>10786711
some women are ugly as sin.

>> No.10786725 [View]

>boob thread
>ass thread
>foot thread (bare)
>foot thread (heels)
>random obscure fetish threads
whats the point? it all belongs on /s/ anyway.
if all the coomers on cgl were banished to /s/ it would actually make BOTH boards better. depose the boomer retards posting low res pictures of their wives

>> No.10786736 [View]

>>10786725
Unfortunately, when there's men there must be coom because otherwise what is the point? Though, and again, you must be the change you want to see. Did you apply to be a janitor?
>the boomer retards posting low res pictures of their wives
God, if that ain't vile. Yet, another reason I am paranoid when it comes to marriage.

>> No.10786756 [View]
File: 279 KB, 1078x1955, Screenshot_2022-07-12-12-16-49~2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10786756

>>10786668
even famous and rich black women lose their shit when they realize no one wants them. lmfao, imagine calling a black guy marrying a white woman a traumatic experience. this is peak femcel behavior.

>> No.10786763 [View]

>>10786725
one of those threads has been going over a year
thats how dead this board is
coom threads arent taking up valuable space

>> No.10786816 [View]

>>10786725
I'm pretty sure that cosplay threads belong on the cosplay board, actually.

>> No.10786860 [View]

>>10782080
>WHAT DID YOU BITCHES LET HAPPEN
Most cosplayers and congoers have left this place for other social media platforms. It's not 2004-2012 anymore where all you had was coscom, ACP and here. Why deal with the cattiness and shittiness of this place when you can just post up on tiktok, reddit and insta. Even the coomers can get better content by going to the previously mentioned spots.

TL;DR Everybody is fucking gone.

>> No.10786889 [View]
File: 41 KB, 680x383, Have sex - Shinzo Abe.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10786889

>>10786373

>> No.10786989 [View]

There is room for both. Stop being a twat.

>> No.10789149 [View]

>>10786660
It's especially funny when those same black femcels angry at black men for dating out, fuck the first dorky white dude that gives them attention. The amount of nerdy black women I've seen with the dorkiest, lankiest white dude is hilarious.

>> No.10789212 [View]

>>10784422
Yo! Me on the right!

>> No.10789435 [View]

>>10784453
And you think they care?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kmtByyzqIWY

>> No.10789484 [View]
File: 2.93 MB, 640x472, 1649760647390.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10789484

>women

>> No.10790147 [View]

>>10789149
Its probably a lipstick alley poster. It seems a lot of that crowd has migrated over here.

>> No.10794885 [View]

>>10782855
Femcel crabs lol

>> No.10794894 [View]

>>10789484
Why are japanese men so gay

>> No.10794911 [View]

>>10786688
good for them they all look happy. Seems like a lot of black women dating white dudes are but that's just observation

>> No.10795193 [View]

>>10786509
I once played a game of spin the bottle with like 6 women and every single one watched porn and was into choke-sex.
I wish young women were anti-porn prudes but they are not, sadly.
>“Methods. We analyzed data on young US adults aged 18 to 28 years from the 2001 National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health, which contained information about partner violence and injury reported by 11 370 respondents on 18761 heterosexual relationships.

>Results. Almost 24% of all relationships had some violence, and half (49.7%) of those were reciprocally violent. In nonreciprocally violent relationships, women were the perpetrators in more than 70% of the cases.” Id.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1854883/
There are lots and lots of studies like this, this isn't one of your one-sided and cherry picked stats that you've probably heard once but blindly repeat because it fits neatly into your neurotic fear of men.

>> No.10797677 [View]

>>10794894
live in Japan,
no family house to inherit because of laws requiring a new house be built every 10/20 years
no cheap housing, because government doesn't support such things
no jobs that don't take 60-70 hrs a week, that can provide housing/FOOD/clothing costs
Work til you drop, because you'll get black-listed otherwise
Don't have money for a wife(stay at home, or kids even)
Women are working just to stay afloat(parents can't afford rent no more/Food)

Government doesn't understand how come the population is going under and no one is getting married and having kids

>> No.10797682 [View]

>>10797677
>no family house to inherit because of laws requiring a new house be built every 10/20 years

You can still buy secondhand homes dirt cheap in Japan, even relatively new ones that don't need to be torn down. And you can get the property pretty cheap regardless. Most people in Japan buy homes for the lot and tear them down to rebuild

>> No.10797713 [View]

>>10795193
That doesn't mean that more women are hitting men, retard. More men are still hitting women. It just means that in relationships where men are the ones getting abused, it's because they're letting it happen by being too pussy to fight back someone physically weaker than them. This study shows that abused women at least attempt to defend themselves, unlike abused men.

Kek you really didn't understand this study at all, did you? You actually posted it as some kind of "gotcha"

>> No.10797715 [View]

>>10797677
all of this is bs

>> No.10797718 [View]

>>10795193
>I once played a game of spin the bottle with like 6 women
you must be 18 to post here

>> No.10797721 [View]

>>10786658
Maybe just...don't feed a 600 pound whale then? None of those fatties can get their food themselves, it's always some retarded simp enabler. This is exactly why this board is nothing but coomer simp trash

>> No.10797837 [View]

>>10797718
These women were all 20s, oldest 25. It was stupid but it is what people do when they're bored and got bothing to do.
>>10797713
Lmao stupid retard.

>> No.10797840 [View]

>>10797837
You didn't understand your own study kek and you're calling someone else retarded kek.

>> No.10797841 [View]

>>10797713

>Studies show that in half of all reported domestic abuse cases it is impossible to determine who initiated the violence, and in the other half of reported domestic violence cases, males and females initiate physical aggression at an equal rate. This is true not only in the United States but also around the world.

>Data collected from 68 University studies from 38 different countries and involving more than 13,600 students found the following:

>32% of the participants had displayed some level of violence towards their dating partner in the previous year
>In 68% of these cases, the violence was mutual
>In 9%, the violence was male-only, and in 21%, female-only
>In 25% of the case, the male initiated the violence
>In 25%, the female initiated the violence
>In the other 50%, one could not tell who initiated the violence
>Studies of married couples show similar results with domestic violence being initiated as follows:

>25% by male
>25% by female
>The other 50% mutually

>> No.10797843 [View]

>>10797840
Study was meant to illustrate general point about how violence in heterosexual relationships, you projected an argument I did not make. You also assume that women are only violent for self-defence reasons, bias is clear.

>> No.10797845 [DELETED]  [View]
File: 948 KB, 678x740, 1660152904880933.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10797845

Women are stupid and I don't respect them.

That's right. I just have sex with them.

>> No.10800361 [View]

>>10782080
Blame Elon Musk.

>> No.10800375 [View]

>>10782855
Today's reminder that femcels only talk about pick mes because they know nobody will ever pick them.

>> No.10800377 [View]

>>10784163
Anon you realize that porn is specifically marketed to women right? That's not even a guess. Its literally how it works.

Also, every woman I've been with has requested unprompted slapping, choking, spitting or slurs. Women these days just get off on that shit. That's the market.

>> No.10800381 [View]

>>10782643
This one is on the edge

>> No.10800389 [View]

>>10800375
>people only like you because you're TRYING to sociable and friendly
lmao femcels are pathetic.

>> No.10800393 [View]

>>10800377
Imagine thinking any porn company at all bothers marketing to women

>> No.10800394 [View]

>>10785475
>because of the whole diversity and inclusion thing

>> No.10800396 [View]

>>10786365
There's no way you're this retarded

>> No.10800402 [View]

>>10797713
For your next trick you'll pretend that lesbian DV rates are lower than they are.

>> No.10800403 [DELETED]  [View]

>>10800389
I'm not a woman. Seethe in your loneliness

>> No.10800427 [View]

>>10800393
Anon, women have been the primary target of marketing since the dawn of time.

>> No.10800474 [View]
File: 12 KB, 267x233, 1660611821575.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10800474

>>10800393
kek imagine being this dense

>>10800402
They are incredibly low, and that tired old one trick meme statistic is inaccurate.

>> No.10800479 [View]

>>10800474
>They are incredibly low
This is cope

>> No.10800483 [View]

>>10800474
Of course you'd whitewash over literal domestic violence jfc

>> No.10800782 [View]

>>10786373
So fucking based holy shit

>> No.10801272 [View]

how do you kings access private instagram accounts?

>> No.10801274 [View]

>>10797841
> no source
hmmm...

>> No.10801297 [View]

>>10801274
anon is referring to >>10795193 retard