[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/cgl/ - Cosplay & EGL


View post   

>> No.10082714 [View]

>>10079258
who dis

>> No.10082738 [View]

>>10082162
This is a man, right? That looks like ita moot.

>> No.10082740 [View]

>>10082738
No, I'm pretty sure it's an ugly girl. Why do we always yell man at every ita with a strong jawline? It's getting so old, there are tons of butt ugly, awkward women out there too.

>> No.10082742 [View]

>>10080473
>inferring anyone with differing opinions on glasses is fat for some reason
Projection, fatty?
>>10081355
Nice reply to yourself.

>> No.10082794 [View]

>>10082280
ayrt, I agree, that definitely is a problem. Ultimately it's their fault, because lolitas generally really try to help you and make you realise you can buy brand on a budget. But not, let's buy a 80usd "lolita" dress on Amazon instead.

>> No.10082796 [View]

>>10082451
Honestly you sound like an asshole too, if you think shaming someone is okay as long as they're posting public

>> No.10082836 [View]

*sigh* splitting the difference:

Posting >>10082160 was a cheat and a dick move because she's fishing for concrit and no one is really giving any. She's not a man. Yes, some of those camera angles are terrible. She seems to want to improve.

>>10082162, on the other hand, has the true ita attitude of not giving a crap, not taking concrit in spite of her horribly constructed "dress", and just being obnoxious to group members that are trying to help her. This one needed to be posted here.

>> No.10082855 [View]

>>10082836
Yes, I feel sorry for >>10082160 because she sounds like a good person who really wants to improve. Also, her sewing skills seem good and I'm sure if she studies more about the fashion she will definitely make nice dresses.

>> No.10082872 [View]
File: 324 KB, 996x1413, _20190118_143331.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10082872

I hate how many western people are shown in Kera nowadays because they generally look like crap. This one said to be entirely lolita. Next two seem more lolita/decora mix. There are some much worse outfits in the post, but those aren't lolita.

>> No.10082873 [View]
File: 306 KB, 1015x1410, _20190118_143447.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10082873

>> No.10082874 [View]
File: 318 KB, 991x1400, _20190118_143508.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10082874

This one looked cute until I looked closer and noticed things like her petticoat peaking out trough after the lined part of her skirt. She's almost there if she's going for a decora X lolita outfit imho.

>> No.10082876 [View]

>>10082873
What in the ever loving fuck is going on with her make up? It looks fucking awful.

>> No.10082877 [View]

>>10081984
It is as long as you don't look like some SJW genderfuck. There are tons of way to style short hair nicely, even more to style it badly.

>> No.10082879 [View]

>>10082080
I saw this. It's a hot topic dress (she said). Someone told her politely it's not lolita and even with a petticoat it wouldn't fit the silhouette because it can't get the proper shape (she owned it too she said), but the girl in the picture kept making excuses about how she normally wears a petticoat but it wasn't practical at school or so, and how petticoatless lolita is a thing because many do it casually.

Honestly, I'm not surprised it's gone. She was starting drama since the first comment.

>> No.10082883 [View]

>>10082162
Wait, did she post this in a Q&A group without a Q?

Also, to any who says she will improve/it's a good start/etc. Look at her attitude. Until she'll change that I doubt she'll improve. She probably won't take any effort to learn, or take concrit nor advice/tips.

>> No.10082886 [View]

>>10082296
How fun would it be if this (I guess admin person) would be the one posting here? I feel like making a "positivity" group would be a great way to create an ita goldmine.

>> No.10082888 [View]

>>10082311
This so much. People are way to naive and trusting.

>> No.10082891 [View]

>>10082385
I think she was confirmed to be a very, very ugly and fat woman.

>> No.10082893 [View]

>>10082576
Fuck, I didn't realise she was still a thing.

>> No.10082894 [View]
File: 45 KB, 590x350, Miss-Trunchbull-688141.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10082894

>>10081641

>> No.10082896 [View]

>>10079722
I wish this was a cream colored blouse, black doesnt suit anything else here

>> No.10082926 [View]

>>10082894
This is getting old. Every time a fat person w/ no bangs gets posted, someone posts Trunchbull.

>> No.10082934 [DELETED]  [View]

>>10082742
look at this thread anon, most of the people posting here are fattychans too, it’s not a stretch of the imagination that you would be too. stop posting glasses though, that shits retarded and personal tastes/distastes can’t and shouldn’t be considered ita standards.

>> No.10082936 [View]
File: 561 KB, 750x746, D1CCC0B5-BE12-4FFE-A202-E801AAFDB50D.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10082936

>> No.10082938 [View]
File: 833 KB, 611x665, Untitled.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10082938

>>10079258

>> No.10082941 [View]

>>10082938
Why those lavender ankle socks...?

>> No.10082945 [View]

>>10082938 looks more like a man than >>10082160

>> No.10082963 [View]

>>10082938
ugh, this girl keeps popping up on my feed too. This is not anywhere even close to old school. stop tagging shit like that.. I follow #oldschool because I want to see old school lolita, not this.

it's like the retards that call something oldschool because it's black and white. STOP.

>> No.10082991 [View]

>>10082941
I think they were once white but got dyed in the wash.

>> No.10082992 [View]

>>10081641
HOLY MOLY!

>> No.10082993 [View]

>>10082991
Sounds weirdly specific

>> No.10082998 [View]

>>10079754
Actually this one is one of her better coords. Her shit is always just plain hideous.

>> No.10083003 [View]

>>10082742
You don’t have to be fat to be bloated. Who is the one who is projecting?

>> No.10083008 [View]

>>10082992
If this is your first time seeing Cankle-chan, you must not visit much.

>> No.10083020 [View]
File: 540 KB, 750x733, 02D667AE-5F46-420A-A4EB-836266DD242C.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10083020

This is the same Lolita that made the unicorn dress

>> No.10083021 [DELETED]  [View]
File: 1.05 MB, 750x1334, 99322FF8-D738-495C-AF7F-49FC10205EC2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10083021

>>10083020

>> No.10083077 [View]

>>10083020
I gasped in the bank. GJ

>> No.10083135 [View]

>>10083020
Fucking yikes.

The bodice looks decently constructed overall. If she would have used better lace, better buttons/embellishments, better ribbons and a mute solid colored skirt fabric this could have had potential.

>> No.10083156 [View]

>>10082228

This advice, like her dress, can be way, way, way simpler. Beginners should really start with the simplest, plainest dress. Make sure the skirt has at least 3m in the hem or 3x her waist (whichever is bigger). Then add a line of lace at the hem and/or across the top of the bodice. Done. Just chose your prints and lace wisely, she can use her oh-so-excellent colour skills there.

Solves the issue of colour balance. Solves the issue of proportion. 3 metres as either a flared skirt or rectangle skirt is definitely the right shape, just need to get the right petti to match.

Any beginner starting out with overdesigned shit is pretty much asking for trouble, I have no sympathy for them. We wouldn't even know she can't make bows for squat if she didn't make so many of them.

It would be a good effort if she was open to learning, but that attitude where she loudly proclaims she has no skills, zero interest in learning, and will continue making ugly shit? Yeah, not much hope for this one, it even puts people off from giving her advice because apparently she won't understand it.

>> No.10083191 [View]
File: 222 KB, 1125x1686, 50327238_2000566896727925_8684439209840214016_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10083191

>>10083020

>> No.10083192 [View]
File: 136 KB, 960x1280, 50670002_2435953656475939_6448498060384272384_.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10083192

>> No.10083209 [View]

>>10082936
This is the kind of ita i love

>> No.10083221 [View]

>>10083192
Ok she looks really good in this one, it’s not hard to find an ita pic if you insist on posting her.

>> No.10083238 [View]

>>10083192
Didn't she used to wear a hijab all the time? And then posted something about being Christian and Wiccan also? I'm probably remembering wrong.

>> No.10083290 [View]

>>10079675
Was gonna call vendetta but then I saw "replica" and "lovely" in the same caption

>> No.10083292 [View]

>>10080575
Id never tag this lolita but I kinda like it. It's very harajuku street.

>> No.10083293 [View]

>>10081164
Nit pick AT BEST

>> No.10083508 [View]

>>10082796
ayrt, if you're posting something in public you better damn well have the balls to withstand criticism. Or are you that big a snowflake?

>> No.10083510 [View]

>>10082874
Still cute, would wear to club and not call it lolita.

>>10083192
she looks ok here.

>> No.10090667 [View]

>>10079342
That fucking cat
Smuggest fat aura I’ve every encountered in my pathetic life.
Blessed cat