/cgl/ - Cosplay & EGL

>>10569330
I mean Angelic Pretty's entire brand concept is basically pretty-princess-dressup-that-you-didn't-get-to-do-as-a-kid

>>9570537
Unfortunately I can't help with translations but I have a few more saved that I can post.

>>9367722
I understand you anon and I'm not trying to say that this necessarily reflects on the entire fashion as a whole but look at AP's concept for example. It's not "trying to be a little girl again" or dressing up "like a child" but the fashion is very whimsical so your comm member's feeling isn't too far removed.

>>8933688
Lolita is not genderless but it is fine for either gender to wear.

I don't question cis men for wearing lolita. But I do find it confusing for transgender men who wear lolita. If you feel wrong for being born in the wrong body, and there are parts of your body that are there when you feel like they shouldn't, isn't it counterproductive to wear a certain style that would make others assume you are of a certain gender? For them to be offended for something that was not blatantly obvious confuses me. Or maybe I'm just ignorant.