/cgl/ - Cosplay & EGL

>>9869829
>IW is sweet, not classic. Their “classic” pieces never truly look classic to me.
Some of their prints are definitely on the sweeter side of things, and admittedly they've always had a cuter take on classic, but please explain to me how pic related is sweet in any way.
You could have said they're not a true/pure classic brand because their designs vary too much in nature, and I'd agree with you; anon once said that IW is the Meta of classic brands and it was actually quite on point. But saying they're a sweet brand is laughable.