/cgl/ - Cosplay & EGL

>Do you wear classic lolita? If not, are you planning to? If yes, do you wear other substyles?

I wear old school sweet as my main style. I have 1 gothic lolita main piece and 2 classic main pieces. I really love old school classic (and some more modern classic) but for practicality sake I choose to focus on old school sweet for the time being. When my old school sweet wardrobe is where I want it to be I'm considering branching out more and getting more classic into my wardrobe.

>Did you start out lolita by wearing classic?

No.

>What drew you to classic lolita?

It has its own charm. I like the different color palette, the more structured tailored look of some pieces, the elegance, the way it reminds me of certain historical fashion elements. Back in the day I started out really appreciating the aesthetics of btssb, VM and IW, but ended up only buying btssb for a long time.

>What are your thoughts about OTT classic? (pic related) Do you think it will get trendy again?

I never cared for it. But if it would come back again I wouldn't mind, as long as it means seeing less nu-sweet.

>Are you a daily lolita and/or a lifestyler?

I have been a daily lolita in the past (way before covid), but right now my wardrobe isn't at the level where I would want to be a daily lolita again. There are also practical considerations.

>What is your favourite brand for classic lolita?

VM and IW, don't tell me to choose.

>What do you think about sweetfags?

Any sweet other than old school sweet is the wrong kind of sweet imo. Most of the 2010s sweet enjoyers are nice enough to be around, but nu-sweets (especially beginners, and people who enjoy chinese nu sweet pieces) are not my kind of people.

>Would you enjoy classic only lolita spaces?

I think these should exist if people want them to be there, and should not have to include room within these spaces for other substyles. If I have more classic in my wardrobe I would very much enjoy classic only spaces.

>>10161487

>>9597963
These boots are amazing.

>>8892681
Victorian Maiden, c. 2001 or 2002