/cgl/ - Cosplay & EGL

>>10818165
There used to not be as many stupid trolls on this board, back in the day.
Things change, I guess.

>>9516667
>>9516669
>>9516679

Anon, are retarded? They were watching sexual content regarding female and male bodies during the study, which is no suprise if they found it sexually arousing. People watch all kind of material for sexual arousing and that's doesn't tell their orientation whether they are gay, bi, straight or whatever, only what they find arousing.

A study doesn't speak for every single woman, more like a sample which was as small as 300+ something in total. So, not all women. Do you just blindly believe everything you read without any kind of criticism? The study sounds as stupid as the one that says that bisexual women exists because men find it hot.

Something you and the idiotic study didn't consider:
>Evolutionary mechanism and preventation of genital trauma: during evolution of humans, women have been forced to sex and to become aroused quickly and to any sexual situation could mean lubrication, and it might have been beneficial for women to respond to any sexual situation with some level of arousal.
>The study doesn't include cultural influences on female sexuality
>Women are more (sexually) objectified than men which might play a role for other females to respond to other female bodies with sexual arousal regardless whether they are gay or straight.
We are forced to see women sexually arousing whether we wanted or not.
>This study falls to western, educated, industriliazed, rich and democratic demographic and the results cannot be applied to wider populance.
>Concluding that women are bisexual on basis on their sexual responding overlooks the complexity and multidimensionality of female sexuality.

Good for nothing study overall.