/biz/ - Business & Finance

After creating the entity, little of your own energy is required to produce the results desired. Because of this, you are able to devote your time and energy to other things as you wish. The entity will go off and complete the task that has been assigned to it. The more energy that you direct toward your entity—depending on the work at hand—the better your results tend to be.
Expanding on the dynamic possibilities of entities, a magickal entity can be used for several magickal tasks at the same time. For example, an entity that has the task of creating wealth can be used to make a company prosper- ous. At the same time the entity can look after a person's personal assets. Often "general skilled" entities can be used over and over for magickal workings that are of similar basis. An example of this would be the creation of an entity that is governed by the realm of happiness. This entity could be used any time that a feeling of happiness was needed.
Magickal entities can be created to be "astral mes- sengers." These messengers can go out and collect bits of information that is of interest to the creator. The entities then can report back to the creator relaying all of the in- formation that was gathered. This type of entity use can be beneficial in times when someone needs to gather important information when under normal means it would be impos- sible, such as in making crucial business decisions.

>>16598666
>he thinks 3 days worth of pay is significant to me
im gonna buy all the way down, if it goes back above 2 i wont buy any more. i hope it goes to 1.50.

>>16598727
based

stay comfy

>>16445745

Noticed that the Whale here has been buying up LARGE amounts of LINK while some of the early adopters have made a few references to CHINA.

Generally, I would ignore larps and rumors, but the buying activity from the mystery whale leads me to think something may be afoot.

Keep your eyes peeled on China. Whatever it is, you may find the news to shift the sentiment around 180 degrees.

This mystery whale stands to make a lot of money:
0x256353bb7db3aa6e33ec0fee3d0fbc04be735818

Check the LINK Amount

>>16194234

>>16124523
Says the weirdo defending a cartoon character that doesn't exist while be found wanting to comprehend the multiple meanings and hidden codes within the image.

>>16041542
>>16041543
don't say you weren't warned.

>>16017579
i have

>>15790103
Thank you. Can I have the blonde cutie eating a Linky please?

running a business in the future requires being able to manage the costs of production. That's all well and good: if you can make a living off what you produce, you need only focus on producing better products, not more expensive ones. And in this world, we often have to accept that what we've made will be bought, not only to feed them, but perhaps even to use for food—not to mention the myriad other problems that result from producing food that is too expensive to the point of being unaffordable to the majority of people who need it. For the foreseeable future, however, it is much more likely our lives are going to focus more on maintaining our current food supply and our own survival, and less and less on our ability to produce better products that, as a society, we want. In short, we will start consuming less and less of what is available, and will be living off what is most likely going to be available. This is more or less how it has always gone.

I find that it's almost impossible to imagine a world in which we do not need to adapt

Not only is it both my and 4chan's birthday today but I also get blessed with this beautiful thread. Life sure can be comfy sometimes.

>>15759435
>tfw still 20yo in college

>>15711027
based

>>15491465
>>DUDE, JUST HOLD LINK FOR 12 YEARS AND THEN YOU CAN START LIVING LIFE
wonder how many people here can adjust to massive wealth and success? How much is too much? There are some who are still so poor that they can barely support themselves. Is the money they earned from their job enough to maintain themselves through retirement? Is this an adequate amount to live on?

When you consider that many young professionals have only been in their job for a couple of months, does it seem unreasonable to think that a year or two working at a well-paid corporate job would be enough to cover the expenses of retirement? The same people who can retire in their 30s now are making around 400,000 dollars a year. So is it really reasonable to think they can manage to live on 100,000 or 200,000? When you consider that young professionals who start their careers in higher value industries (e.g., finance, IT, journalism) are typically not long-term employees like most other workers, it seems reasonable to think they won't need more than 100,000+ to cover basic expenses. A person in their 20s might still feel they need to accumulate more wealth and assets to provide the kind of income that will keep them from going broke, but at the same time, they need to work to remain sharp and active.

>>15430277
Checked.

>>15329807
>It has good energy and good discussions I hope more anons are having a cold comfy beer while posting its a nice break from the shitflinging
>>>15329741

>>15312861

Hi

>>15307026
>>15307045
post the stream sirs. im sitting here comfy

>>15265618
ahem

>>15260460
comfy