/biz/ - Business & Finance

You're going to look back and wish you spent your money and time on a real investment

>S-sergey is gonna deliver right?
>Muh scam ico without a smart contract
>A-a-assblaster said $3 by May
>$1000 EOY
>Under $0.35

How stupid are you? look in the mirror. Your parents would be ashamed in you wasting your money on a team selling digital snake oil

>>11234675
You've probably missed out on quite a bit being invested in this, trim that last 26k link and buy ETH

>>11235114
Good job, we need about 100 more anons to wake up but I'm confident December will be a huge wake up call. This won't be $1 and half the board shilled for $1000, I wish I could buy puts on Chainlink. I would've made a killing from $0.60 down

>>11235202
oops

Excellent, more and more are waking up

He's a scam artist. Nothing more to say. He took $32 million in an illegal ico and delivered vaporware to a bunch of obsessive bagholders who shill 24/7 on a pajeet penpal board

You invest in things like Chainlink and expect to afford a BMW M4 and a penthouse. With this lack of research (besides believing dot connecting pajeets selling you their bags) you blindly pour your money into a shit token investment. You really believe idiots on this board have your best interest in mind.

Rich people don't tell their secrets. Go to any wealthy man and ask him how he got rich. He'll bullshit you. Rich people want money for themselves. Wake up. Chainlink will get you nothing but remorse in 5 years, looking back in disbelief that you believed a bunch of bagholding pajeets on a shill bulletin board

>>11244197
I'm tired of Chainlink shitting up this board. Long ago we had useful information on BTC/ETH/XMR and eventually even antshares. People made fortunes. There were scams but they weren't to this extent

The dot connecting is garbage. These people don't know. I've been in the room with Sergey, Dmitri, Steve, even Lord Varys stunt double. They don't realistically believe the price ever passes $5 but here we have $1000 EOY shat all over this board

>>11244308
You can no longer spend to get the card, you have to be invited now. I received an invite after cashing out ETH and going to town. Think my spend that year was around $339k

>>11244484
Fair point but the rebrand information was absolutely huge. If you bought even $5k worth you made big time money.

The whole point of this board is to make money. Not spend $10k on LINK which turned into $2k, like the $1 bagholders

>>11244546
I got lucky with the other pillar of crypto huh? ETH is the future, LINK could only dream of an alliance that ETH got. Adoption, maybe by a couple nobody startups that will never make it work

>>11244631
This is actually a brilliant way of putting it. I have talked about this a few times, but yes great points

>>11244744
>t. $1.14 link buyer

>>11244718
I agree that rebrands are dead in the water, and even self shilling is dead (TRX)

Further proof that we're at the point where you invest in the top 2 and keep an eye out for small caps ($1-5 million market cap)

>>11245072
Says the stupid fuck that can never say why it's a good investment. How high did you buy your bags? This is never passing $0.50 again, accept it pajeet

Take the anger, sell, and go buy a self help book. Get some of those brain cells to work so you can stop being a pathetic poorfag

>>11245148
This board is going down the tubes because of idiots like you. Get rekt linkie

>>11244667
Yes, yes you are

>>11245202
>Calls the LINK drop at $0.59
>Falls down to the teens
>AnYoNe wHO LisTENed tO YOUr brOke AsS iS An IDiot

>>11245291
On the contrary. You may be one of the first to ask me that. I have faith that we absolutely need trustless decentralized oracles to aid the automation efforts coming in the next 20 years. Self-driving cars, robotics, delivery and logistics, there is a clear need for this. But not like this... not like this. This won't work. Both Amazon and Google are in need of something like this to push forward, as is Tesla, Lyft, and UPS. They are going to wait it out, as this team is not THE team to achieve it.

Trust the facts. Oh and keep watching the space, there are projects behind the scenes that have a totally different concept than a token.

>>11245368
They are intelligent in that I know them, they're nice guys, but this task is too big, too tall for them. They have literally said this is a longshot but we'll try.

>>11245451
It would actually be most hilarious if one day you found out I was one of the biggest LINK holders. Anyway, those partnerships are great, but until main net (which isn't coming in 18 or 19)... yeah. I am looking forward to the conferences, I will be in attendance at 2 of them if you can find me biz. I wonder if assblaster will be attending as well?

>>11245645
go to bed anon, the events don't focus solely on link. sf blockchain is all about chainlink? bed time for you

>https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/chainlink/
>$0.33

I hope you like the dump I put together with my friends. $0.38 was too high, $0.33 is still too high. This shitcoin will be $0.01 EOY

>muh fedex oraclez

Useless. Token.

What OP said

:-)

>>11317914
thanks sergey

>>11337057
That's because astro was a troll faggot. I just happen to be an oldfag that has loads of $ from eth. My end game is to look for new opportunities to one day get to $50-75 million. After that, I'm riding off into the sunset

Stop putting money into link idiots, you'll end up like >>11337057