Stinky Linky

[Anonymous No.8723881]

So much work being done on github right now,
are we close to singularity?

https://github.com/smartcontractkit/chainlink

[Anonymous No.8723926]

>>8723881
I didn't want to say anything while you were shitting on the street, but yeah.

[Anonymous No.8723937]

>>8723881
>devnet
>updated 16 minutes ago
hoo boy

[Anonymous No.8723938]

>>8723881
Singularity is May 3rd

[Anonymous No.8723975]

>>8723881
Bend over boy
Spread
Feel the Wrath of 1MM Link

[Anonymous No.8724015]

>>8723881
I want to hear everyone proudly exclaim I'm a stinky linky. Do it with me guys!

>I'm a stinky linky!

> I stink like link!

> Grab your didgeridoo Marvin I just did a stinkeroo!

I wanna see this on every thread on this website.

[Anonymous No.8724016]

>>8723975
>>>8723881 (OP)
>Bend over boy
>Spread
>Feel the Wrath of 1MM Link
What?

[Anonymous No.8724082]

>>8723938

The singularity might come soon, but I'm betting 100% that mainnet will be Q3... Probably September.

[Anonymous No.8724125]

>only 1.2k
Fuck. I need my job to pay me more or invest in knee pads or something.

[Anonymous No.8724174]

>>8723881

[Anonymous No.8724184]

tfw only manage to get 3k, how much do i need to go to lambo land?
WHY AM I BORN IN ASIA? FKING WAGEKEKIG IS NOT ENOUGH SINCE buying POWER IS 4x LESS

[Anonymous No.8724256]

>>8724016
Yeaaaaaahhhhh
Feeeeeeeeellllsssss gooood boy

[Anonymous No.8724276]

>>8724184
You will be a samurai of the land.
$100k eoy 2k19 though

[Anonymous No.8724290]

>>8724082
Agreed

[Anonymous No.8724337]

I have 26k link... ive got 5k usd which i was waiting for 20c link to double my stack. Doesnt look like it will happen. Is 26k enough to make it? The 5k usd i took from real life savings.

[Anonymous No.8724424]

We gonna make it. Lets see them chainlink memes.

[Anonymous No.8724514]

>>8723881
i wish i knew how to read this stuff

[Anonymous No.8724559]

>>8724514
a pull request, is when a developper finishes coding a story point or a user story, an epic or a bug.

basically we have what we call sprints, a sprint can last 2-4 weeks, and we decide in a sprint planning what story points we will implement. and each developper takes a ticker (user story or a bug) and tries to finish his task as fast as possible.

git, is really god for agile developpement, because once a dev finishes coding a part of the app, he submits his pull request, and usually it gets reviewed by other devs, and once other devs agree on the code written, they give a thumb up, and the pull request is merged into the developpement branch.

dunno if I helped...

go chainlink 1000$ EOY

[Anonymous No.8724614]

>>8724559
actually it does. thanks. do you see anything particularly interesting?

[Anonymous No.8724619]

>>8724559
So at this rate, when would be your guess-timate on when mainet would be deployed?

[Anonymous No.8724642]

>>8724337
Yes, be prepared to hold though. Even linklets will make it if they hold for 5-10 years

[Anonymous No.8724644]

>>8724619
>knowing how coding teams work is equal to being to predict link mainnet

[Anonymous No.8724663]

>>8724619
Probably another hour or so.

[Anonymous No.8724698]

>>8724614
>>8724619
I don't have access to their slack, I actually work on contract lifecycle management on a big insurance company.

but I guesstimate their mainnet to be by june or july.
Rory stated multiple times they are ahead of schedule. and with his last slack comment he said they don't want to fuck the mainnet release for the people they work with.

this is a pretty bullish comment, it means the team wants to deliver a top quality product.

they might delay the release to Q3 if they want further testing.

but code coverage is about 83 percent, so this is pretty good already, I really hope they make a bugless release.
for me it's like wanting to deliver the saint graal, As an experienced dev I know making a release with 0 bugs is impossible, that's why we have to plan for it.

but I trust sergey and their team, they are making a top quality job.

[Anonymous No.8724741]

>>8724698
so code coverage in this sense means that its 83% tested, 83% complete, or something entirely different?

[Anonymous No.8724829]

>>8724741
83 percent of the code is covered by tests

[Anonymous No.8724846]

>>8724829
cool, thanks for taking the time to answer questions that im sure are low level

[Anonymous No.8724879]

>>8724698
They gotta be closer than that

[Anonymous No.8724891]

>>8724879
Why? Cause you want your lambo now?

[Anonymous No.8724899]

Just got the alpha node running on linnode. This is probably a retarded question but is updating it through the beta then production version going to be the same updating any other software on linux?

[Anonymous No.8724911]

>>8724879
he probably says its closer than that because, other projects depend on chainlink, and they are eagerly waiting for it, for their mainnet to be usable.

[Anonymous No.8724920]

>>8724642
How many links to be considered a linklet?

[Anonymous No.8724926]

>>8724846
no problem fellow marine! We are all in this together

[Anonymous No.8724935]

>tfw only 28k link

[Anonymous No.8724944]

>>8724920
there is no such thing as linklet, only marines.

[Anonymous No.8724948]

>>8724879
id love this timeline where everyones moon is waiting on link and then when link launches its the only moonshot

[Anonymous No.8725004]

>>8724911
Exactly. Im sure there is a lot of pressure on them right now because of this.

[Anonymous No.8725030]

>>8724944
Check and <3

[Anonymous No.8725082]

>>8723881

I can't wait for main net to go live and my STNKY LINKS finally being worth 26 cents each.

[Anonymous No.8725132]

>tfw 7.5k link and enough btc to make that 10k but then if link utterly fails I got duped twice and I'd rather just make less of the moonshot than look like a big fool
>tfw no face

[Anonymous No.8725147]

>>8725004
I know but they made it clear they don't want to release a half cooked version.

wait & see

you can't lose with link anyways

[Anonymous No.8725171]

>>8724911
I know that i.e. REQ will probably use chainlink for fiat pairings but what if the mainnet is later then the dates for its usecases
will they just relay on centralized oracle solution for the moment or will they wait?
Or does their schedule imply that the chainlink mainnet also will be ready ?

[Anonymous No.8725180]

what about the private repo?...
singularity will happen when they announce who they are working for. will this be before or after the mainnet? who knows.

[Anonymous No.8725184]

>>8725082

Kek. If Mainnet releases by Q3 Link will 100% reach $5+ by EOY. And that's the minimum and only if we are in a bear market all year.

[Anonymous No.8725194]

>>8725132
7.9k whale here, gitgud

[Anonymous No.8725222]

>>8725171
theres no one using req mainnet so theres no rush

[Anonymous No.8725250]

>>8725171
no they can't do that, they cannot sell their clients a tech, and decide to change midway. it's impossible.

theyHAVE to wait, just like everybody. I don't think it's a big deal for them, if CL deliovers a top quality product with no downtimes and temper proofness, they will say amen to the date CL will give them.

BTW, the v1 of chainlink is ETH centered, they'll probablu move to other techs once their v1 is stable

[Anonymous No.8725272]

>>8725194
7.9k links isnt even a fish you pajeet

[Anonymous No.8725339]

>>8725194
>"whale"

[Anonymous No.8725357]

>>8725194
>"whale"

[Anonymous No.8725362]

>>8724899
When the Beta's out I'm just gonna start everything again from scratch. Thomas will have another video out by then, he did also say when he released the Alpha setup video that he wanted to make one that shows you how to set up a node from a clean install, so installing all your dependencies etc.

[Anonymous No.8725408]

>>8725339
>>8725357
yikes

[Anonymous No.8725409]

>>8725194
barely a shrimp

[Anonymous No.8725414]

>>8725362
I did it from a clean install, that's pretty doable by anyone who has used ubuntu or whatever before. I just wonder if updating to chainlink beta will be the same as updating go or truffle or anything else. Anyways there's no real point in doing it now unless you're going to develop for it.

[Anonymous No.8725418]

>>8724944
Damn this is wholesome.
I love you, anon.
LINK $1000 EOY

[Anonymous No.8725443]

>>8725171

People like to say linkies are deluded, but REQ said they want an immutable ledger for fiat.

They do not want a centralized solutions because it can have down time. REQ themselves said this.

So if god forbid LINK was delayed it would delay REQ too.

[Anonymous No.8725456]

>>8724944

[Anonymous No.8725485]

>>8725456

[Anonymous No.8725496]

>>8725250

This is the other reason. REQ has to wait for LINK.

When PWC partnered with REQ I'm certain REQ explained the ChainLink project how their using ChainLink. Their not going to switch from ChainLink suddenly, switching oracle providers would be a massive change for PWC.

And coding and using oracles isn't just plug and play. They've likely been developing with ChainLink in mind for months.

[Anonymous No.8725508]

>>8725456
>>8725485

[Anonymous No.8725549]

>>8725496
yup, that's why i'm saying it's impossible.
they WANT a decentralized oracle solution with 0 downtown, it's vital for their business.
also REQ is just 1 project we know of.
can you guys imagine the big flood of announcements that will follow mainnet? I mean new blockchain projects who will get sseduced by link, and would want to join in on the craze?
omg can't wait, and they say 1000$ is impossible.

yeahhh righht

[Anonymous No.8725559]

>>8724948

If this happens I would fucking die of happiness.

I'd take like 80% of my profits and move into ICOs that are gonna use LINK for double profits.

[Anonymous No.8725560]

>>8723881

Mah linkays so stahnky.

[Anonymous No.8725625]

>>8725194
10.044k link whale here, get on my level.

[Anonymous No.8725627]

>>8725549
>oracle solution with 0 downtown

[Anonymous No.8725640]

https://github.com/smartcontractkit/devnet/commit/82f36533720cd35160b78a6eb82938adb5b1dd56

[Anonymous No.8725647]

>>8725549

Yeah, don't forget about these little guys. Origami Network x ChainLink https://ori.network/#8

[Anonymous No.8725711]

My portfolio is a 50/50 spread of link and req. Am I gonna make it?

[Anonymous No.8725847]

>>8725711

You'll make it more if you go 100% Link.

Not trying to shit on Req I think it's great, but Link will outperform Req bigly.

[Anonymous No.8725856]

>>8725640
so ropsten soon?

[Anonymous No.8725865]

>>8725711
You already made it anon, you just don’t know it yet.

[Anonymous No.8725904]

>>8725711
>>8725847

Read that paragraph for REQ themselves.

REQ is waiting for LINK's mainnet to release their biggest feature.

If REQ is waiting for LINK, why hold REQ?

Nevermind the fact LINK has a smaller circulating supply...

[Anonymous No.8726176]

>>8725856
Yes. The goal is to get Chainlink nodes on Ropsten (by this weekend) and then implement the consensus code. April will be an exciting month and will give many a very good idea when Chainlink will go full main net.

[Anonymous No.8726267]

>>8726176
What is significant about the git that makes you think this weekend?

[Anonymous No.8726273]

do you need linkies to run a chainlink node?

[Anonymous No.8726312]

>>8726267
There are no other significant additions needed in the Chainlink code. This is why you are seeing the Ropsten configuration code getting implemented in the devnet section.

[Anonymous No.8726341]

>>8726312
Damn i wish i knew what this meant...

[Anonymous No.8726358]

>>8726312
except the contracts for which there is no evidence of it being created yet... not to say they might not have started or even been near completion but there's still a lot needed and you can't make any estimates because of that, even if the nodes themselves are almost done.

[Anonymous No.8726380]

>>8726358

Are you really this fucking stupid?

[Anonymous No.8726422]

>>8726358
The consensus and validation codes will show up only a few days after Ropsten...so next week. This code has been worked on for months and will be evident once reviewed. Many will be excited as Sergey will make another Medium post explaining the progress and giving a rough estimate of what is to come. As I mentioned before, this will all happen by next week.

[Anonymous No.8726474]

>>8726422
Unless you have some sort of insider information, there's literally no evidence of this publicly available.

[Anonymous No.8726481]

>>8726422
How do you know itll be next week tho?

[Anonymous No.8726489]

>>8726422
Screencapped

[Anonymous No.8726553]

>>8726474
>>8726481
The best evidence I can show is keep an eye on the github.

[Anonymous No.8726561]

>>8725171
not fudding, but where does it say that req is using LINK? i'm sure they are, just cant find confirmation of it anywhere.

[Anonymous No.8726565]

>>8724642
>5-10 years
nice fud, but stop talking outta your ass, it will moon this year, and then stablilize in 2019 with some slow growth as the speculation dies down and pure demand kicks in
we either make it soon or we don't

[Anonymous No.8726661]

>>8725194
He just means he's a big dude

[Anonymous No.8726705]

>>8726565
Wishful thinking.

There is no way Link achieves 10% of its actual worth by 2019. That kind of growth does not happen in a year.

How long did it take btc to go from $0.30 to $3k?

[Anonymous No.8726729]

>>8726705
How long did it take for eth to go from $10 to $1000? Crypto moves ever faster.

[Anonymous No.8726794]

>>8726422
>Many will be excited as Sergey will make another Medium post explaining the progress and giving a rough estimate of what is to come. As I mentioned before, this will all happen by next week.
Where is anything whatsoever pointing to 1. a blog post, and 2. a one week time frame in the repository? I'll wait.

[Anonymous No.8726799]

>>8724935
Don't fucking panic !

[Anonymous No.8726841]

>>8724829
For the non devs out here. I have worked on large enterprise software and 83% is quite good.

[Anonymous No.8726845]

>>8726705
>10% growth just doesn't happen in a year
Go back to your stock threads you complete fucking retard

[Anonymous No.8726846]

>>8726794
A medium post in this market is a guaranteed dump lmao

[Anonymous No.8726849]

someone explani to me how ropsten matters when johnny huxtable said chainlink would take 3 to 5 years and the icebox part of pivotaltracker is full of shit to do.

[Anonymous No.8726881]

>>8726561
they said they are in talks with CL in one of their blogposts
also CL is the only decentralized oracle solution with a product in sight so i guess its the only option

[Anonymous No.8726884]

>>8726794
Anon, in order to find out you will need to contribute to the project. Once you contribute, you will be invited to the private slack channel. Honestly, with almost 30 people in the channel I am surprised more doesn't leak.

[Anonymous No.8726900]

>>8726553
are the partnerships real? when will they come forward?with the launch of the mainnet?

[Anonymous No.8726903]

>>8726849
I was going to call you out on your retardedness but I see your ID confirms you are a spaz so I'll let you off

[Anonymous No.8726910]

>>8725904
Req moves money and burns tokens.
It is equally good , at least.
Normies fomo a lot into money stuff.
Mcap, gross, net income, etc. They like money related buzzwords.
Fast and yuuuuge growth.

[Anonymous No.8726935]

>>8723881
> a lot of work
> 24 commits last week
You have no idea, what a lot of work looks like

[Anonymous No.8726936]

>>8726884
are u srs all I have to do is contribute

Can it be a shitty contribution? Like what if all my code sucks and gets rejected. Will I still get invited? I'm a brainlet

[Anonymous No.8726952]

>>8726900
The POC is still ongoing with Swift as confirmed a few weeks ago by Rory. Other than that, no comment.

[Anonymous No.8726955]

>>8725194
I got 150k links bitch. And i'm not even a whale. I need about 500k links to be considered a mini-whale

[Anonymous No.8726970]

>>8726884
so just another larper whose prediction is not going to come true. Glad we cleared that up.

[Anonymous No.8726977]

>>8726910
yup. no reason not to hold some req. my link/req distribution is 80/20. I think the burning mechanism will be great short term when it gets adopted and its a very marketable project.

[Anonymous No.8726988]

[Anonymous No.8727001]

>>8726936
They encourage any and all contributions, even spelling error corrections. I will say this, if your code is merged, you will more than likely be invited to the channel.

Do you remember a few months back when Jordan posted to slack then quickly deleted. He thought he was posting in this channel. There has been a few other slip-ups but the posts are edited to a "." before anyone notices typically.

[Anonymous No.8727018]

>>8726422

This is literally the worst timing for major releases. Have fun holding bags until BTC runs again, because we are not even going to approach 10k sats until then. Gonna be lmao'ing when all these epic updates don't budge the price.

[Anonymous No.8727032]

>>8726970
No larp, no tripcode. Only reason I am confortable posting is there is enough evidence in the testnet newest code today for any dev to realize Ropsten is days away.

[Anonymous No.8727034]

>>8727018
>thinking LINK depends on BTC

[Anonymous No.8727046]

>>8726955
nice larp, kid

[Anonymous No.8727054]

>>8727018
The real holders of link do not care about the day to day or week to week $ of link. We understand the big picture

[Anonymous No.8727059]

>>8727018
It's more about the passive income anon. Yeah obviously a high token price is preferred at some point, but in the short term linkies will rake it it running nodes.

[Anonymous No.8727060]

>>8727018

I will add that Link could literally announce they are working with SWIFT concretely, tomorrow, and because of this market the price would still be tanked. Have fun reading all this elaborate fomo bullshit, stinkies.

[Anonymous No.8727062]

>>8726935
maybe for shitty coders like you you need thousands of commits to fix all your shitty buggy code, but not Sergey's team.

[Anonymous No.8727085]

>>8727032

what are your qualifications

why did jonny huxtable say 3-5 years, then? what is the point.

[Anonymous No.8727129]

>>8727034
Hahahajjaha, HAHAHAJAJAJJA REEEEEE how can anyone be this stupid
>>8727054
Oh yeah? Well I'm sure link will be worth hundreds in five years. Just hold them bags son!
>>8727059
Less than 1% of you morons will run a node and less than 5% will stake with LinkPool

[Anonymous No.8727157]

>>8727085
Jonny is one of the more vocal people in the private slack channel. Not sure where the 3-5 years comes from? Did he say adoption? Expect Jonny and Linkpool team to put together a blog post the same day or day after Sergey.

[Anonymous No.8727164]

>>8727129
idgaf what other retards do

[Anonymous No.8727194]

>>8727164

Have fun getting paid in worthless link tokens hahahahah

[Anonymous No.8727207]

>>8724944
We're all going to make it :')

[Anonymous No.8727218]

>>8727157
What about the Artificial Lawyer guest post? That came from someone who presumably is in the private channel. Is that where he got that from?

[Anonymous No.8727243]

>>8727194
Likewise

[Anonymous No.8727260]

>>8727218
Think it was a rumor. Unfortunately, Sergey is not active in the private channel. We do get a lot of 2nd hand information from Rory, Steve and others

[Anonymous No.8727286]

>>8727218

Hanging on to every larp you lay your eyes on like a true deluded linklet. Consider holding something with value next time kiddo.

[Anonymous No.8727300]

>>8726884
Ty good sir. Where do you see link price eoy?

[Anonymous No.8727341]

>>8727286
>t. guy with less than 5k in crypto

[Anonymous No.8727355]

>>8727300
I won't speculate on price. What I will say is i'm very confident Link will be a top 20 coin within 6 months time.

[Anonymous No.8727374]

>>8727129
Heh heh you have made me feel inadequate. Ree

[Anonymous No.8727401]

>>8727286
I have a folder full of screencaps of failed link larps and false predictions. it's just fun and games, no need to get upset, friend

[Anonymous No.8727414]

I'm going to be purchasing 10k LINK around June. Will I be too late?

[Anonymous No.8727466]

>>8727414
Yes, don't even bother at that point

[Anonymous No.8727480]

>>8727414
Probably

[Anonymous No.8727489]

>>8727414
June? cmon nigga

[Anonymous No.8727501]

>>8727355
Ty bro. Ive literally been holding since ico. Hope link can pull it off.

[Anonymous No.8727515]

>>8727401
I've got a screencap of sherlocklink fucking up a larp that I post in all of his threads now.

[Anonymous No.8727597]

>>8724125
same desu

[Anonymous No.8727650]

>>8727515
post it

[Anonymous No.8727658]

this one hitting the moon https://powl.io/exchange/

get in and thank me later

https://etherscan.io/address/0x34ba9c7402e1df11709c7983008b5a49d59e963f

[Anonymous No.8727685]

>>8727650
He was larping as a wallstreet insider and forgot to change his trip

[Anonymous No.8727698]

>>8727401
I'm not upset, just pointing out that a majority of linklets actually take them as fact because they are eternal bagholders

[Anonymous No.8727773]

>>8727515
sherlocklink was always a shitty trip
hey look i googled the guys who follow the porject in github
im an insider

[Anonymous No.8727841]

>>8727773

Hey look I found a random high profile financial analyst who works for swiss capital and have created an elaborate larp that will fail to meet any of the predictions therein
>and people still cite assblaster as legit hype

[Anonymous No.8727917]

>>8727157
>https://github.com/smartcontractkit/chainlink

i forget, it was here and on reddit and it was in the slack, he said 3-5 years. i remember verifying it myself.

[Anonymous No.8727952]

>>8727917

Yep remember fellow linkmarines, just hold the bags for 3 years we will all make it together!

[Anonymous No.8728011]

>>8727194
>i must shit in a hurry for i've had too much curry but there's no need to worry there's plenty of room on the street.

[Anonymous No.8728052]

>>8724015
>>I'm a stinky linky!
>> I stink like link!
>> Grab your didgeridoo Marvin I just did a stinkeroo!
>>8724015
>>8724015
>>8724015
>>8724015
>I'm a stinky linky!

> I stink like link!

> Grab your didgeridoo Marvin I just did a stinkeroo!
>>8724015
>>8724015
>>8724015
>>8724015
>I'm a stinky linky!

> I stink like link!

> Grab your didgeridoo Marvin I just did a stinkeroo!>I'm a stinky linky!

> I stink like link!

> Grab your didgeridoo Marvin I just did a stinkeroo!>I'm a stinky linky!

> I stink like link!

> Grab your didgeridoo Marvin I just did a stinkeroo!>>8724015
>>8724015
>>8724015
>>8724015
>>8724015


>>8724015
>>8724015
>>8724015
>>8724015

[Anonymous No.8728074]

>>8727841
Assblaster was at least somewhat believable

[Anonymous No.8728094]

>>8726845
This is the type of math i expect from the crypto community at large. Thank you for validating my disdain for you

[Anonymous No.8728113]

>>8726729
The equivalent move would be from $10 to $100k

[Anonymous No.8728115]

>>8728094
thanks for validating my parking, peasant.

[Anonymous No.8728243]

>>8727032
bless you anon

[Anonymous No.8728336]

>>8727685
Kek I do that too. But he’s unfortunately gone

[Anonymous No.8728420]

>>8726422
News and updates don't work in bear market.
I am sorry.
We dumpin to 15c

[Anonymous No.8728516]

>>8727060
verge is literally up 55% in the last 24 hours because redditors are braindead
if swift came out with that LINK would be up 5000% in an hour seeing as there's zero selling pressure on any of the pairs

[Anonymous No.8728567]

>>8724559
Thanks code brah

[Anonymous No.8728588]

>>8727414
why june? it's literally cheap as FUCK right now.
if you're going to be getting money around june take a loan now and pay it back in june with the money you'll get

[Anonymous No.8728608]

>>8724619
Jonny said probably mid August. I guessed late August.

[Anonymous No.8728614]

>>8728336
outstanding

[Anonymous No.8728655]

>>8728094
Fuck off nigger

[Anonymous No.8728706]

>>8728516
Links success would destroy /biz/
Its pretty shitty now but i cant start imagine it after that

[Anonymous No.8728972]

>>8728706
just buy link and join us on the link train chooo chooo

[Anonymous No.8728999]

>>8728655
Judging from your math skills, you sir are the nigger

>>8728115
>implying I'm not in crypto too
Listen, pleb, if you can't tell that the majority of your peers here are brainlets, you are one

[Anonymous No.8729009]

>>8728972
This you will be a millionaire if you buy 10k link and hold for 3-5 years it is a sure thing

[Anonymous No.8729115]

>>8725640
It approaches

[Anonymous No.8729130]

>>8728972
Whats your eoy price for link? If i can get 100k u think ill make it?

[Anonymous No.8729266]

Don't quarrel, there's still enough of linkies for everyone

[Anonymous No.8729272]

>>8729130
nah, 10 million still isn't made it territory, sorry brah

[Anonymous No.8729285]

>>8729130
eoy a 1000$ is plausible

[Anonymous No.8729294]

>>8728706

If link actually succeeds this will be one if the all-time legendary sagas of 4chan.

[Anonymous No.8729305]

>>8727060
Yeah no. SWIFT represents 11,000 banks worldwide you fucking bigger. All the big websites would push an article. LINK would hit $5 EASILY quite quickly and beyond

[Anonymous No.8729357]

>>8727414
Potentially yes

[Anonymous No.8729368]

>>8729294
remove the IF fuder

[Anonymous No.8729377]

>>8728972
I already own link anon
But this board would flood with normies more than it is now

[Anonymous No.8729394]

doesn't eth dying mean a huge problem for link cus it was made for that platform?

help a brainlet out

[Anonymous No.8729434]

>>8729394
In the short term it would be an issue, however, the beauty of link is that it is "blockchain agnostic". This means that it can be adapted to any other blockchain via core and external adapters. Sorry that I don't have a source at the moment, but a rando on twitter was already able to program an iota adapter such that link can read data from it. A core adapter would be needed to write data though.

[Anonymous No.8729465]

>>8729394
ETH will scale bro. Either way LINK is blockchain agbostic and will work with private chains, and hyperledger. LINK does not even need ETH

[Anonymous No.8729478]

>>8728094
They aren't wrong though. That level of growth has precedents in crypto. You're actually retarded if you believe it isn't possible.

[Anonymous No.8729489]

please, just drop to 10c once.. i just want to accumulate at least 10k..

[Anonymous No.8729504]

>>8729394
>eth is dying
lol what does the price have to do with the condition of the project?

[Anonymous No.8729514]

>>8729489
Hold out for 20 but all time low was 13c in september 2017, if we ever see that price again we are well and truly fucked

[Anonymous No.8729532]

>>8728999
These poopdick faggots aren't my peers. How dare you?!

[Anonymous No.8729540]

>>8728999
my math skills are bad because I know that crypto can do more than 10% a year? Fuck off retard

[Anonymous No.8729598]

>>8729514
>if we ever see that price again we are well and truly fucked
Not really. If BTC hits 'despair', it could briefly drag LINK down to 10 or 11c. The market would likely bounce back quickly, but the chance would be there.

[Anonymous No.8729631]

>>8729598
Ah, well it's not outside the realm of possibility I guess. Don't expect people to sell at those prices though, the order book is dry even now. You know what it'll look like at 12c?

[Anonymous No.8729637]

>>8729377
dude can't fucking wait for noprmies to buy my bags at 1000$ KEK, i'll welcome them with scat porn, dwarf fucking and animes

[Anonymous No.8729771]

>>8727060
Bullshit

[Anonymous No.8730056]

>>8729771
I guess it really depends on the definition of "working with" and "partnership". If SWIFT is actively using CL and the tokens, then no fucking way in the world the price wouldn't move. But you have VeChain or WTC type of "partnership", then it will get btfo