[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 18 KB, 630x630, 2328989_0.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7560330 No.7560330 [Reply] [Original]

Can this coin really bring down crypto because of its double spend bug on exchanges? Could the same thing that happened to Bitgrail happen to Binance

>> No.7560377

This exchange is great, please use https://binance.wtf/ redirects to my rêf.

>> No.7560385

If you haven't got all your coins off of Binance it's already too late

>> No.7560405

No, this could not happen to Binance. It is Bitgrail's fault and not a Nano fault.
Fransesco Firano (aka the Bomber motherfucker) was just a bad programmer, allowing to manually edit values in the JS request and then it would be recieved on the withdrawal page. Binance has better programmers for sure, this wont happen to them.

>> No.7560432

>>7560330
The blockchain lattice is a public ledger. There isn't single nano that has ever been double spent, ever. This is the most retarded FUD pajeet. Try something that can't be disproved in 10 seconds.

>> No.7560451

>>7560330
like >>7560405 said

>> No.7560724

>>7560330
The biggest mistake Raiblocks/Nano made was that their devteam gangraped a dog in the ass without a condom for good luck and high profit.

This is the exact same reason the Dogecoin community declared war against Raiblocks/Nano.

>> No.7560783

https://www.reddit.com/r/bitgrail/comments/7wi75w/how_francesco_firano_killed_nano/

Nah, this guy deserves all the blame, not the coin

>> No.7560796

>>7560330
Bitgrail guy didn't know how to code his exchange. There was no Nano double spending and people showed the exchange bug happening with ETH as well. What happened to Bitgrail can't happen to Binance unless Binance has a retarded person code their exchange and then ignore bugs/attempt to manually fix account totals for months.

>> No.7560866

>>7560724
Vitalik also said that NANO is the worst ERC20 token he has seen. He would probably love to do a hard fork on ETH to kick NANOs ICO code completely out.

Nano is the first token that I would not want to have, even if someone gave it to me freely.

>> No.7560919

>>7560866

Lmao where did you fudders come from

>> No.7561067

>>7560866
The "NANO is an ERC20 token" posts are always my favorites.

>> No.7561069

>>7560919
>https://www.reddit.com/r/bitgrail/comments/7wi75w/how_francesco_firano_killed_nano/
>10% of the entire Max Supply is stolen
>Lmao where di you fudders come from

Deluded nannies, when will they learn? Sell before it breaks below 100k sats buddy

>> No.7561081

>>7560724
>>7560866
also the nano founder said the token being over $1 would defeat the whole purpose, its in the whitepaper

>> No.7561130
File: 75 KB, 1766x382, doublespend.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7561130

>> No.7561158

>>7561081
Yeah, I don't think most crypto investors bother to read whitepapers anymore. That is exactly how we have ended up here in the NANO bubble. It will most certainly pop soon. NANO will not go to 0, but close.

>> No.7561268

>>7561081

[Citation fucking needed]

>> No.7561392
File: 147 KB, 653x933, IMG_20180114_205026.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7561392

>>7560385
This

>> No.7561464

>>7561392
I wouldn't be surprised if Binance would exit scam with NANO as well. They have always had troubles with ETH tokens and this one might just take the cake with their endless problems and leave them no choice, but to give up on being an exchange.