/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.7087663]

Should I buy now? Or is the dip not here yet? This shit always dips hardest in the morning

[Anonymous No.7087682]

>>7087663
Shit is a scam.

[Anonymous No.7087703]

I already hodl a shit ton (bought all before $0.50) and I had to fill up my bags again when it hit $0.65 one last time. May dip to $0.60 that'd be a steal tho

[Anonymous No.7087719]

i went all in a night ago

[Anonymous No.7087767]

This is manipulation while Chainlink Crypto Fund tries to fill their bags and accumulate $2.2million in LINK. The orderbook doesn't have that much though, so they need to scare people into selling by suppressing the price.

[Anonymous No.7087781]

Envious of you buttfuckers. I went all in at $1.42

[Anonymous No.7087810]

>>7087663
Bought in at ~$0.7 but I think I'm going to buy more if my money gets here before this dip ends. $20-40 EOY

[Anonymous No.7087886]

>>7087663

[Anonymous No.7087902]

I bought in around SIBOS, and then a fuckload more near the bottom. Average price: 29 cents.

I'm fucking untouchable. LINK is nothing but green for me. I'm not even all that happy with my average price, but seeing the dips come nowhere near it makes LINK a comfy hold.

[Anonymous No.7087933]

Don't forget that because bonds are currently in a bear market, the alternatives such as smart bonds, through ChainLink will become more appealing

[Anonymous No.7088064]

>>7087933

Not just more appealing, but they'll become the standard within the next 3 years.

ADHD traders can't think in timelines that long, but we're veerrrrry close to the turning point where banks adopt DLT en masse, and there will be no turning back at that point. The crypto market cap will go on consume the entire money supply, and every transaction will become digitized as everything gets moved on chain. They've been eying this stuff for years, and their world moves slow, but they've been making huge strides toward their end goal, and LINK is a key piece.

[Anonymous No.7088166]

I thought LINK was a meme.

[Anonymous No.7088175]

>>7087902

Bought in at $0.40 here. Pretty comfy but I've about had it with the price manipulation. There's no reason we shouldn't be at $2. I guess I'm happy for the guys late to the party buying in at rock-bottom discount prices but fuck me this is preposterous.

[Anonymous No.7088180]

>>7088166

That's what we wanted you to think. The more people we convinced it was just a meme, the cheaper we could buy LINK.

You didn't even read the whitepaper did you?

[Anonymous No.7088209]

>>7088180
Do you think the team can pull it off?

[Anonymous No.7088240]

>>7088209
It's pretty solid if you know what I mean ;)

[Anonymous No.7088251]

>>7088209

If you'd been paying attention you'd know they already have.

[Anonymous No.7088299]

>>7087663
>actually buying LINK
lmao, how do people fall for the memes?

[Anonymous No.7088327]

link vs mobius

[Anonymous No.7088336]

>>7088251
? They have a working product? IIRC their github hasn't been updated for a while...what's your opinion on mobius?

[Anonymous No.7088352]

>>7088209
>There are unironically people on this board who haven't bought some link yet

[Anonymous No.7088382]

>>7087663
>a Russian scam
>an american made, early adopter backed, waltonchain partner
Hmmmm..

[Anonymous No.7088407]

>>7088327
mobius, 10x over

[Anonymous No.7088415]

:( I don't know what to believe :(

[Anonymous No.7088416]

>>7088209

I've tried my hat at starting a startup before, and I failed miserably at it. But from that experience what I can say is that seeing them focus on product + business relations and seeing them not give af about socials, while at the same time catching glimpses into the partnerships they've established, I think they're doing amazingly well with the limited man hours they have available, and with the recent hires + upcoming marketing hire, I think its only going to get better from here.

Its easy to burn yourself out when you're trying to start a company, so seeing how laser focused they are on making progress in the ways that will go on to become meaningful, and seeing them be willing to forego the usual social media hype bullshit a lot of ICOs/crypto projects have cancerously become known for is a massive positive IMO. It shows they're committed to delivering the system they've promised and ensuring that their partners will be ready to roll on day one more than pumping the price of their token and keeping an autistic community of pseudo traders happy.

So for a shorter answer, yes, I think they're going to pull it off. We're within a month of code release, and within months of mainnet. We'll see an increasing number of partnerships be made public after mainnet as partners spin up their nodes and integrate with them. There's no foreseeable timeline where this isn't consider cheap af LINK.

[Anonymous No.7088457]

>>7087663

I'd dip my toe in right now but honestly that's about it. I'd wait for a clear upwards trend to really dive in. Overall the project is great and it solves a difficult problem but LINK seems to be trying to do too much at the same time vs. competitors like Mobius and Oracalize.

If Sirgay comes through then sure you'll be fine but how sure of a bet is that? I went through his linkedin profile and questioned if he's someone that can really stay committed to a project of this scope for the long term.

[Anonymous No.7088467]

>>7088407
link has a working test net why is mobius better

[Anonymous No.7088506]

>>7088467
Links Github is empty. Intentionally removed. No updates.

Mobius announced partnership earlier last week

[Anonymous No.7088508]

Can someone put chainlink tokens on the tips of her fingers?

[Anonymous No.7088517]

>>7087902
Same here.
First started buying in .38c then hodl & bought the shit out of it @.17c even bought a few more @ .70c last week.
Still up 185% & know this fucker is gonna go nowhere but up for the next few years.
Can't wait to retire on my 30K stack.
Praise Sergay!

[Anonymous No.7088547]

>>7088457

> Anonymous (ID: 87I9xGws) 01/30/18(Tue)00:11:37 No.7088457▶

>>7087663 (OP)

I'd dip my toe in right now but honestly that's about it. I'd wait for a clear upwards trend to really dive in. Overall the project is great and it solves a difficult problem but LINK seems to be trying to do too much at the same time vs. competitors like Mobius and Oracalize.

If Sirgay comes through then sure you'll be fine but how sure of a bet is that? I went through his linkedin profile and questioned if he's someone that can really stay committed to a project of this scope for the long term.

this has to be bait... because its bullshit.

LINK does one thing, and it does it well. Mobius promises the kitchen sink in a soupy amalgamation of ideas done better by other projects. They literally copypastad portions of their whitepaper from other projects, and if it ever sees the light of day it will do a little of everything, but so poorly that no developers will ever built on top of it, choosing instead a modular approach to dApp development... you know. kinda the whole point of decentralized apps.

[Anonymous No.7088555]

are we worried about turtle?

[Anonymous No.7088560]

I'll be buying LINK until 5 buck so I dont too much about the current price

[Anonymous No.7088608]

>>7088506

Repo was renamed because its the old code. New code is being released within the next month or two at most. Its being developed in a private repo until its released.

If you don't know anything about software development, you're not qualified to be giving people advice on software platforms I'm afraid. You're welcome to lose your own money, but unless you're some paid shill there's no reason to try to convince other people to waste theirs.

[Anonymous No.7088612]

>>7088547
So LINK > Mobius

[Anonymous No.7088624]

>>7088336
Their code is not open to the public.

[Anonymous No.7088682]

>>7088517

Ya I'm sitting on a 25k stack and can already taste retirement too.

Honestly though I'm most excited to play with the tech itself. I'm going to stake some coins in whatever pool emerges as a trustworthy option, and may take a crack at running a few nodes myself that service dApps I plan on making + their markets. Its a legitimately exciting project for developers, which is why its a no brainer IMO. You can't even imagine the possibilities this opens up for developers... that's kind of its whole point.

[Anonymous No.7088717]

A little off topic but I went all in on RLC...should I sell that for LINK? RLC is an amazing project as well with a professional team that delivers the items on their roadmap on time.

[Anonymous No.7088751]

Lawl I love how funny all you 4channers are, but be honest with me here, is xlm going back to a dollar before link takes off? I want more shares in link but I don't know if I should all in right now :/

[Anonymous No.7088794]

>>7088612

Infinitely so. Their partnership with zeppelin_os ensures they're the default oracle for any dApp being developed from late 2018 and onward, and their partnership with SWIFT will be part of the most rapid spike in crypto market cap we've ever seen within the next couple years.

And those are just two of its partnerships. There's reason to believe Sony will be looking into working with it, and potentially Docusign as well. Some of the breadcrumbs lead me to believe Deloitte may be looking closely at it because it allows them to sell blockchain contracts to clients without forcing them to rewrite all of their software, and if they were that on its own would lead to even more fortune 500 partners for Chainlink through Deloitte.

LINK will allow blockchains to eat the world.

[Anonymous No.7088858]

>>7088717
They are both incredible projects. You may feel more comfortable in RLC if the FUD on link bothers you, but if you have been on 4chan for any amount of time I doubt that it does. Im holding both.

[Anonymous No.7088867]

>>7088794
Gah, you convinced me, I'm buying some LINK now.

[Anonymous No.7088887]

>>7088858
Yeah, the other anon convinced me to buy LINK but RLC is too good of a project so I'll just have to wait for my next paycheck :)

[Anonymous No.7088939]

>>7088858
BTW, what's your opinion on ENG?

[Anonymous No.7088945]

>>7088867
how much are you buying?

[Anonymous No.7088958]

>>7088887

Ya I won't diss RLC. Its a solid project as well. Glad you chose to grab some LINK though. I wouldn't have 25k if I didn't think it'd be worth something :P

[Anonymous No.7088964]

>>7088945
As much as I can :) I have to wait for my next paystub though :(

[Anonymous No.7088966]

>>7088608
They know, fagbius hired a team of pajeet shills a few days ago, always kicks off at night when poos wake up.

They have no heart, their shilling is shit, fagbius will fail

[Anonymous No.7088996]

>>7088964
a couple hundred dollars worth?

[Anonymous No.7089008]

>>7088966

Oh it clearly will. I'm super thankful I'm a dev in this market... helps weed out the trash from the revolutionary. I couldn't imagine trying to comprehend this marketplace as a normie... a shiny website with the right buzzwords would steal your money so fast in this game.

[Anonymous No.7089035]

>>7088996
Still a student so only make around 2k a month, I plan to buy as much as possible...possibly up to 10k worth.

[Anonymous No.7089053]

>>7089035
I just hope LINK doesn't moon anytime soon :)

[Anonymous No.7089078]

I find Mobius weird technically. The way they provide data to the Blockchain is by accepting calls on a centralised API. So data requests to the Blockchain have to originate off-chain. Its solution is poor compared to what CL is planning for the initial implementation IMO. I wouldn't class Mobius as a direct competitor desu. Their implementation has a lot to be desired in my opinion. I agree with the people who say they're trying to do too much.

To expand on what I said, my personal issue is with their API:
https://mobius.network/docs/#buy

So to buy data and create an Ethereum contract to use it, you need to go a centralised API and centralised BE what manages it. In practise, this means that even though the data retrieval is decentralised, the management of that data is completely centralised.

Chainlink will be completely different. To request the data, it can originate from on-chain or off-chain. The API for requesting the data is also each individual node, which then propagates that request across the network. So even though Chainlink will have a centralised FE which makes it easy for people to use it, it means that the requesting of the data and the management of it all, is completely decentralised.

Also keep in mind that the retrieval of data into Ethereum is just one aspect of Chainlink, the aspect included in the initial implementation. There's also BTC/Hyperledger and what CL can do there, The BTC/Hyperledger functionality will be completely different to that, and creates a whole new aspect not yet seen in any other Oracle projects at all.

[Anonymous No.7089096]

>>7089008
Any personal recs besides link and rlc

[Anonymous No.7089109]

>>7088945
I think it will be a long time before we see ENG blow up. Any coin that solves a very difficult computer science problem is worth having on your radar though. Im holding some for tomorrow as I expect a pump, but I think the market isn't in a place currently where coins that take some effort to truly understand are seeing price increases. As this industry settles in I think we'll see major growth on cryptos like Eng, Link, Iexec.

[Anonymous No.7089138]

>>7089109
Good for a poor student like me! More time to buy! :)

[Anonymous No.7089141]

>>7089078
Quality post smells of early 2016 /biz/

[Anonymous No.7089165]

>>7089078

Screenshotted. This kills the pajeetcoin.

LINK enabling bi-directional flow of data that remains decentralized is its biggest selling feature. Its akin to how some of the most core protocols of the internet works. MOBI isn't even in the same league, let alone ballpark.

[Anonymous No.7089243]

>>7088682
where do you store your tokens? I'm getting nervous holding on the exchange

[Anonymous No.7089267]

Off topic, but do you guys think a portfolio consisting of only RLC, LINK, and ENG will yield good long term gains? I plan to purchase and hold these 3 for at least 2 years...I call it the holy trinity!

[Anonymous No.7089268]

>>7089096

At the moment not a ton. Been kind of ignoring prospecting a bit while crypto is boring.

ENJ seems like a decent buy and I have a small stack of that.

DNT should have some updates within the next few months so there may be a spike to catch there.

I've got some NEO, Waves, DOVU and UKG as well, all which I bought months ago so I don't know where they're at for entry point/if I'd suggest any of them now.

I did bump into CRNC and may look into it more. Its ICO is coming up soon and it looks potentially promising. I haven't decided if I'll buy the ICO or try to just scoop it on ED afterward yet though.

[Anonymous No.7089288]

>>7089078
Saved as pasta thx

[Anonymous No.7089301]

>>7089243
I'm not the anon you addressed but I just store my stuff on Binance...the 2FA should be good enough. I also heard that there was a way for cold storage wallets to be hacked. Besides if Binance goes down, crypto probably goes down as well so holding on a wallet will make no difference.

[Anonymous No.7089323]

>>7089301
this is why i kept all my beetcorns on gox and things worked out well for me.

[Anonymous No.7089335]

>>7089078
Just curious, what is your occupation? You seem very knowledgeable about tech, I wish to be like you!

[Anonymous No.7089350]

>>7089243

10k of them I've moved to my wallet. the other 15k I still currently have in the exchange with the hope/assumption that Binance will still be around in a few months :P.

I may flip a small chunk of my stack around mainnet launch, and then flip a bit more toward EOY, but I haven't wanted to move too much because I haven't decided how much I'll flip (will likely depend on price targets). I'm hoping to still squat 15-20k of them for at least a few years though so I'll move more to my wallet eventually.

Then again if I start making gains with the rest of my stack, I may opt to just keep everything and move it all to my wallet for a few years. We'll have to see.

[Anonymous No.7089364]

>>7089323
Hmm...do you think Binance can get Gox'd though? IIRC Gox was doomed to fail from the beginning, too many vulnerabilities.

[Anonymous No.7089381]

>>7089267
Extremely solid, although I think its very possible the big growth on these will be after those 2 years.

[Anonymous No.7089386]

Also doesn't Binance utilize cold storage?

[Anonymous No.7089400]

>>7089268
Thanks for the reply

[Anonymous No.7089410]

>>7089364

Every exchange has too many vulnerabilities. A recent audit of SK exchanges found they all suck.

I've got a fairly sizeable stack of coin on Binance at the moment, but I don't intend to leave more on it that I'll actively trade for very long. Never trust someone else with your money. That's the whole point of crypto.

[Anonymous No.7089412]

>>7089381
I don't mind :) I'm poor so that simply means more time to accumulate!

[Anonymous No.7089433]

The reason people think LINK will go up a ton is that they think banks and big corporations will adopt the technology


But you think big banks are gonna rely on 4chan NEET node operators to verify data for them?


LMFAO they will just make their own oracle service retards you know banks can afford they own IT department right?!

[Anonymous No.7089437]

>>7089410
If you don't mind me asking, what wallet do you use?

[Anonymous No.7089465]

>>7089078
no sirs this is false LINK is scam coin worthless friend trust me by mobius good coin much money friend please sirs buy

[Anonymous No.7089466]

>>7089433
By that logic isn't most of crypto useless then? The big corporations can simply create their own version of it.

[Anonymous No.7089470]

>>7089350
Thoughts on Monero? NEO keeps popping up on smart investor lists.

[Anonymous No.7089503]

>>7089433
the majority of nodes will be run by large companies. Your fud is kill

[Anonymous No.7089507]

>>7089437

On mobile Jaxx, on desktop I just use MEW. I've been considering a hardware wallet... but I don't know that I trust the idea so I may just toss Linux on an old laptop I have, rip out its antennas and designate it my cold storage machine.

[Anonymous No.7089530]

>>7089466
Coins have value because they can be used for payments and quick wealth transfer. All tokens are useless. Utilities are a meme. Why the fuck would a bank use some decentralized verification service controlled by autistic 4channers who got lucky to buy in early?

[Anonymous No.7089540]

>>7089470

My thoughts on Monero are that I wish I'd bought $50 Monero when I was looking at it :\

Great project. I keep himming and hawing about an entry point but could have made gains at most prices by now.

[Anonymous No.7089594]

>>7089433
This is actually retarded and I cant believe im taking the time to respond to it.

This argument is brought up as FUD on every single project. Get this through your dumb thick, hallow skull: A compnay is not going to take the time, money, and effort into something when they can pay a company to provide the exact service they are looking for.

Is an airline company going to open its own oilfields to avoid paying for oil? No, of course not. They are going to keep purchasing oil to keep their company running.

[Anonymous No.7089627]

>>7089594
They can just copy the link source code for free dumbass


LINK will be $.01 after the conference is a total disaster next month

[Anonymous No.7089648]

>>7089627
Wasn't that patented?

[Anonymous No.7089685]

>>7089594

Nah don't you know, every website re-implements their own version of HTTP. Fuck standards.

[Anonymous No.7089723]

>>7089627

Sure. And you could copy the source code for Reddit and spin up a clone in a few hours.

Oh wait. Nobody would give af about your clone because network effect exists. Same rules apply... the value is in the network, not the code.

[Anonymous No.7089726]

>>7089268
PM here at a tech firm (was a dev for awhile). Usually I'm very skeptical when people larp about what they do on this board. You throwing ENJ as a recommendation gives me confidence you aren't bullshitting anyone here. (FYI I also believe ENJ is going to be big in the future)

[Anonymous No.7089780]

>>7089627
Yea copy the fucking source code. This works well on a peer to peer system reliant on nodes. Complete ignorance.

[Anonymous No.7089782]

>>7089723
Why the fuck would Chase bank care if nobody else used their internal oracle service?


You really think banks and exchanges that trade billions a day will rely on anonymous crypto speculators to verify sensitive data for them?


Sort your life out. Seek mental help.

[Anonymous No.7089785]

>>7089726

Ya I like to shill and FUD for fun, but tonight I'm just being me :P

ENJ definitely looks promising. My dev friends and I have talked for years about how it seems odd more games haven't tapped into crypto yet, and we're all in ENJ now. If they can pull off a solid Unity SDK in a few months it could easily moon. Plus look at their booth's position at the Game Developer Conference.

[Anonymous No.7089826]

>>7089782

An internal oracle service is pointless.

Learn to read, and then read the whitepaper. Until then you're a brainlet.

[Anonymous No.7089850]

>>7087663
It's been dipping for 9.5 days. How long will it last? one more day? Another week? Reach $0.25 by EOfeb and then "moon" to $0.75 EOmar?

[Anonymous No.7089867]

>>7089826
Yeah I did it was full of bunch of indecipherable algorithms and shitty buzzwords.


The only think propping this shitcoin up is FOMO from losers who didn't get into ETH or BTC early

[Anonymous No.7089868]

>>7089782
How are they going to internalize the information they then give their oracle?

[Anonymous No.7089869]

>>7089785
not enough toilets.

[Anonymous No.7089902]

>>7089867

> Yeah I did it was full of bunch of indecipherable algorithms and shitty buzzwords.

> how I know you're a brainlet

Face it anon. You're never going to make it because you can't even understand the tech you're investing in.

Stick to the training wheels safety pack of coins if you value your money.

[Anonymous No.7089913]

>>7089782
you can't be helped. Just await your doubled wojack status every year from now until blockchain is no longer a tech that's used. Fuck i'm actually laughing

[Anonymous No.7089928]

>>7089867
>shitty buzzwords.

There it is. When someone has difficulty understand something, they write it off as "buzzwords". You will not make it.

[Anonymous No.7089951]

>>7089902
I have a 140 iq buddy...

[Anonymous No.7089977]

>>7089951
>tells people about his high iq on an anonymous uzbeki cat fancy forum

[Anonymous No.7090000]

>I duuu has a one fordy iq

[Anonymous No.7090009]

>>7089977

[Anonymous No.7090014]

>>7089350
Mr. Dev Anon, do you have any thoughts on Block Array (ARY)?

[Anonymous No.7090030]

>>7089951

> shares IQ
> doesn't realize he proved he's a brainlet

Without fail, everyone I've ever met who brags about their IQ is both retarded, and a complete loser.

[Anonymous No.7090061]

>>7090030
I have a 4.0 in engineering what are you doing with your life?

[Anonymous No.7090080]

>>7090014

I don't know much about it at all, so not really. One of these logistics chains is going to go on to be a killer project, but I honestly have no idea how you'd go about picking the winner. It'll come down 100% to what partnerships each of them land and how forward thinking that industry is... seems like it'll be a hard sell for a while but I don't know much about the industry.

[Anonymous No.7090099]

>>7090061
No one cares faggot. This is an anonymous image board. We will judge you based on what you claim to know (or not know) on the current topic. And you have proven to not know shit. Now fuck off and cry yourself to sleep boy.

[Anonymous No.7090173]

>>7090061

I became a developer at a college that costs a fraction of what yours cost, didn't give af about my grades because only small minded grinders care about grades, and have worked in the government, in academia, and now have a dope gig working from home getting baked every day as a developer/sysadmin in media.

Grats on being a brainlet kiss ass. I work in the industry you want to work in, and have expended a fraction of the energy and money you will doing it. I also managed to do it without once trying to brag about my IQ or grades... what a sad life that sounds like where you actually care about either.

[Anonymous No.7090210]

>>7087781
Damn you got me beat, retard. I got in at $1.35.
I might buy more so I can DCA down to a less embarrassing price.

[Anonymous No.7090228]

>>7090061
Top fucking kek is that you, M?

[Anonymous No.7090271]

>>7090173
Mr. Dev Anon, do you have any thoughts on Tezos? Seems interesting.

[Anonymous No.7090281]

>>7090061
I worked at spaceX and I've seen plenty of engineering students with 4.0s get blown out in technical interviews, GPA doesn't mean much. Congratulations on being a homework drone brainlet.

[Anonymous No.7090299]

>>7090173
are you pretending you don't know he's trolling you? i understand people who enjoy shaking out weak hands, but not this sick shit. i feel like everyone here is just here to rp. is this what happens when you make it? i don't like it.

[Anonymous No.7090302]

>>7087767
This. Been paying very close attention to the orderbook these last days. Someone is very crafty

[Anonymous No.7090322]

>>7090271

Wasn't it confirmed a scam? I admittedly haven't investigated it much outside of headlines... which haven't sounded great.

[Anonymous No.7090491]

>>7090281
[EXTENDS SNOUT]

[Anonymous No.7090568]

>>7090030
>Without fail, everyone I've ever met who brags about their IQ is both retarded, and a complete loser.
Please elaborate on your definition of "winner" if someone who won the election for President of the United States of America is still a "loser" in your eyes. Truly intelligent people aren't afraid to flaunt it.

[Anonymous No.7090581]

Please Kek, let this drop to £0.20.

I’m poor as fuck and this is my only shot

[Anonymous No.7090602]

What could this possibly mean

[Anonymous No.7090633]

>>7090602
Cuck and handle pattern

[Anonymous No.7090839]

Reminder that he shilled Trump on LINK during the WEF meeting

[Anonymous No.7090900]

>>7090602
Accumulation for a new leg up, look at icx for a market leading example

Also, for the scared brainlets:
create.smartcontract.com/#/choose

Working oracle data feeds using Chainlink POC code. It isn't decentralized, but this is how easy and robust chainlink will be once the decentralized mainnet is up and running.

[Anonymous No.7090910]

>>7089433
Companies exist to fulfil a particular niche and to do it well. If every company refused to ever outsource materials and services literally nothing would ever get done.

Can't believe I'm even replying to this Pajeet FUD.