ICP vs. LINK

[Anonymous No.56183492]

It’s clear that tech always wins in the end so I don’t mind waiting. Which one is gonna win out though? Having a hard time choosing

[Anonymous No.56183502]

shitcoin vs shitcoin

[Anonymous No.56183510]

>>56183502
This isn’t a trolling thread. Add something constructive or leave

[Anonymous No.56183512]

>>56183510
ahem, haircomb

[Anonymous No.56183521]

1. Link isn't in the same level of horseshit as ICP
2. Link has a dedicated and active dev team and crew that effectively support it on your behalf.
This is all the help I'm giving you.

[Anonymous No.56183533]

>>56183521
Which one is a useless erc20 token? I can’t remember.

[Anonymous No.56183535]

3c

[Anonymous No.56183538]

>>56183492
I feel that they are two opposing teams, ICP is the blockchain that can do everything, and doesn't need link.

All other blockchains are shit, and will rely on link to get offchain data.

I can't tell you which will win out, but what I will say is that ICP is the only chain that can build useful applications real businesses may want to use...

[Anonymous No.56183548]

>>56183521
ICP has the most commits on GitHub with the most cryptographers in the world

[Anonymous No.56183698]

>>56183533
How does that make it useless?
>>56183548
Linux has more commits on github than Windows,...
See how idiotic that sounds?

[Anonymous No.56183714]

>>56183698
Kek
>>56183548
HAHAHAHA YOURE RETARDED

[Anonymous No.56183732]

>>56183492
how can you compare an erc20 token that acts as an oracle with a full stack platform that can act as the internet? icp doesn't even need oracles since it communicates via https with web2. you literally have the biggest brains in the world working at dfinity. native bitcoin is integrated at the core level which means it just got a whole lot smarter. theres a bunch of devs working in stealth building out btc dapps. how even dare you compare icp with link?

[Anonymous No.56183741]

>>56183732
Current tally is
ICP:2 >>56183732
>>56183538

LINK:0

[Anonymous No.56183747]

three cents

[Anonymous No.56183767]

>>56183492
ICPoor is a scam
https://www.arkhamintelligence.com/research/reports/icp-report

[Anonymous No.56183841]

>>56183492
I'm all in on ICP. It will vacuum everything up once ckETH and ckERC20 goes live (less than 1 year left for this to happen). By the way, while USDT/USDC will likely be first, LINK ERC20 tokens will also be included.

ICP will vacuum up everything. It's the best pure tech play. Sure the price is shit, but DCA'ing remedies most concerns regarding that.

Here is a quick rundown of the latest:

>ckBTC was and continues to be a success with MyLugano app as the first real-life pilot for payments
main focus for DFINITY is now ckETH which is a huge deal.
>ckETH yields way to ckERC20 which means you can store USDT directly on the IC blockchain
>Instead of scumbag marketing, DFINITY is currently investing in IC Hubs in major regions around the world to boost development on the IC blockchain
>Dom admits challenges with tokenomics. Parties who invested at 3 cents are obviously dumping to take profits
>The situation will eventually normalize, death spiral won't happen. This has already been proven mathematically on DFINITY forum, as even if ICP were to be =$1.50, node payouts would comprise ~27% of total rewards.
>There’s already a cap for node providers and then they’re working on a proposal now for a different cap
>DFINITY is a nonprofit that only focuses on making ICP the best blockchain

[Anonymous No.56183849]

>>56183841
ICPoor is a centralized scam that nobody uses for anything.

[Anonymous No.56183865]

>>56183849
3 cents... have been deposited into your professional FUDder account. Who is funding you people?

[Anonymous No.56183900]

>>56183865
I always thought it was a bunch of bagholders in perpetual state of 2021 when moonman was here and he made people go all in at $40

[Anonymous No.56183921]

>>56183900
>bagholders in perpetual state of 2021
i think that's everyone who still posts here that isnt paid to

[Anonymous No.56183961]

>>56183865
what FUD?
this is fact, nobody uses this trash for anything.

[Anonymous No.56184012]

>>56183492
I just realized that its we have got such threads since 2017, comparing LINK with actual shitcoins and asking which is the one to buy.
Almost makes it look like a ploy to push people away from investing in LINK.
Many fell for it and are now holding REQ, ARK, BAT, PNK etc instead of LINK.

[Anonymous No.56184095]

>>56184012
those don't do shit
ICP does though

[Anonymous No.56184137]

>>56184095
ICP is worth less than you could have possibly bought it for how much have you lost already baggie?

[Anonymous No.56184189]

>>56184137
i don't own any icp

[Anonymous No.56184253]

>>56183841
>>Instead of scumbag marketing, DFINITY is currently investing in IC Hubs in major regions around the world to boost development on the IC blockchain
https://twitter.com/cburniske/status/1703998653223047380

[Anonymous No.56184362]

>>56184189
post wallet

[Anonymous No.56184986]

>>56184253
dfinity is dumping loads of cash in Asia development. Dominic is playing 5D chess. now that hong kong is the crypto hub again these rich chinks are going to spend billions on an ecosystem that can handle speed and scalability.

[Anonymous No.56185007]

>>56183492
I HOLD BOTH
insert gigachad pic

[Anonymous No.56185355]

>>56183492
ICP is really cool. Too bad the community hops from one horseshit app to the next horseshit app acting like it'll be the savior of the coin.

The platform needs a variety of stuff going on (outside of the social media clones), but the community is betting it all on a Hail Mary game that even the creator says wont be out in +10 years. If there isn't anything built by then ICP will just crumble under the node operator costs before that time passes.

[Anonymous No.56185703]

>Scam vs Scam
Quite literally. LINK is just mediocre but they promised so much and little has been actually delivered, in years. ICP on the other hand quite literally fucked everyone over with inside trading, for which there's a shit ton of proof for.
The conversation should be THIS, to be honest. I made this in Paint. What do you think?

[Anonymous No.56185762]

>>56185703
>ICP on the other hand quite literally fucked everyone over with inside trading, for which there's a shit ton of proof for.
post it

[Anonymous No.56185772]

>>56185703
You’re Indian trying to shill your Kava bags by comarping it to a legitimate project like Kaspa. I’ve seen you in multiple threads

[Anonymous No.56185867]

>>56185762
Nevermind found it in that lawsuit:
>Data from the website ic.rocks, which tracks ICP transactions, corroborates Arkham’s analysis. That data shows that, on May 10, approximately 4 million ICP tokens were sold on Coinbase. Nearly all of those tokens were sold by just twenty different accounts, which received their ICP directly from Dfinity around that time. A research report from Cycle Dao, published at the end of June 2021, shows that “Seed” and “Early Contributor” investors had access to only 1,660 ICP on May 10. Statements from “Community Airdrop” and “Presale” investors, described below, show that they did not have access to any ICP on May 10.
> addition, on May 24, a single account sold 2 million ICP on Coinbase; on June 15, another account sold approximately 5.2 million ICP on Coinbase; and from May 16 to July 28, another account sold approximately 6.5 million ICP on Coinbase. Each of these accounts received its ICP from Dfinity, and from no other source. These three sellers were responsible for selling nearly 14 million ICP between May 10 and July 28 on Coinbase
>Data from ic.rocks shows that “Seed” and “Early Contributor” investors currently have access to only 3.25 million ICP total (and would have had access to even fewer tokens in May and June, due to the vesting requirements described below). And data from Messari, in the report endorsed by Dfinity, shows that “Strategic” and “Presale” investors would only have access to less than 3 million ICP until June 30. Dfinity and its insiders were therefore responsible for these large sales, in addition to many smaller sales that occurred over the same period.

Thing is this relies on how accurate ic.rocks data is. It was made by a random dude and isn't even around anymore. It's strange that Dfinity is still developing it if it was suppose to be a rug pull all along.

[Anonymous No.56187761]

>>56185867
Arkham Intelligence?

>That data shows that, on May 10, approximately 4 million ICP tokens were sold on Coinbase. Nearly all of those tokens were sold by just twenty different accounts, which received their ICP directly from Dfinity around that time.
>on May 24, a single account sold 2 million ICP on Coinbase; on June 15, another account sold approximately 5.2 million ICP on Coinbase; and from May 16 to July 28, another account sold approximately 6.5 million ICP on Coinbase. Each of these accounts received its ICP from Dfinity, and from no other source.
Why is this insider trading?

[Anonymous No.56187866]

>>56183492
LINK has been chosen, it was the main thing at SIBOS this year