2160 divided by 365 is 5.9….

[Anonymous No.53071021]

It has been 5.5 years since Link was created. 5.9 years coindes with March for when SWIFT comes out with their CBDC’s. Everything is lining up correctly gentlemen. We will all make it if we listen to the signs. They are made complicated on purpose. Love the fudder, for he will not survive and it is up to us to remember his legacy.

[Anonymous No.53071033]

>>53071021
I’m surprised none of you figured this out by now. I know /biz/ has become lame but god damn people. Can any of you think?

[Anonymous No.53071036]

>>53071021
Imagine posting that pathetic Chainlink Labs infographic

Get a grip on reality faggot

[Anonymous No.53071053]

>>53071036
You retards do realize you stand out like a sore thumb every time you say Chainlink Labs since no-one called it that ever until you paid niggers flooded this shithole?

[Anonymous No.53071059]

>>53071021
>>53071033
sirgay nastyslob's low iq minion makes a shit thread

[Anonymous No.53071067]

Ignorance is a bliss aint it?
How does it feel to hold those bags for Sergey so he can dump on you?

[Anonymous No.53071137]

>>53071053
>LE PAID FUDDERS
Mentally deranged schizophrenic there are barely 20 people posting on here

[Anonymous No.53071145]

>>53071053
i called it chainshit labs

[Anonymous No.53071181]

>>53071053
sup Chainlink *LABS* employee

[Anonymous No.53071185]

I work gor chainlinklabs and I thank chainlinkgod based king every single day

[Anonymous No.53071211]

I'll give you a couple of answers I've filtered over the years to be true, from the few times I've gotten a fudder in a rare moment of clarity:

1) Turbo autists who figured out the need for externally connected smart contracts very quickly, and who now seethe at the entire world for failing to understand it like they do. Chainlink is sort of like a metaphor for their general inability to integrate with society, where they are rational and right and it's the world's fault it's so irrational and dumb..
These people fud because in their mind the world should have figured out LINK in 2019 at the absolute latest, but failed to, and so they'll seethe and rage at everyone and everything as a way to express this frustration.

2) People who had LINK stacks but lost them swinging, or gambling, or in a CeFi collapse, or who simply got fudded out of LINK back in 2018 and have been furious ever since. They will never buy LINK because they can't buy it at $0.30 like they had the chance to back then, and then basically rage at people continuing to hold because "if I can't make it then neither can you"

3) People who try to profit off taking an oppositional position to LINK. Usually grifters like the CLCG/Honeycomb/API3 guys, or NEXO, who are charlatan fraudsters and basically parasitic animals to Chainlink just like there are many fraudster teams that are parasitic animals to ETH. They fud because muddying the waters about Chainlink lets them shill themselves, it doesn't go much deeper than that.

4) The seriously mentally ill, like Michael, who also fits in category 2) but has now made a large part of his online identity "being a link fudder" and can't really distance themselves from that because it's the only way they can consistently get attention online, which they crave

[Anonymous No.53071214]

>Chainlink Labs
>nastyslob
>chainshit
thanks for the new free filters my fellow discord friends

[Anonymous No.53071237]

>>53071214
sup newfag
>>/biz/?task=search2&ghost=&search_text=chainshit&search_subject=&search_username=&search_tripcode=&search_email=&search_filename=&search_datefrom=&search_dateto=&search_op=all&search_del=dontcare&search_int=dontcare&search_ord=old&search_capcode=all&search_res=post\
>You retards do realize you stand out like a sore thumb every time you say NANO Foundation since no-one called it that ever until you paid niggers flooded this shithole? IT WAS ALWAYS RAILBLOCKS

[Anonymous No.53071354]

>>53071137
Deflection
>>53071145
Deflection
>>53071181
Deflection

[Anonymous No.53071396]

>>53071033
Anon Im at a point where my trust is so high I dont need anymore hopium to maintain my grip. Its a cool finding ngl and i trust you are right. Its just that as many other Link marines, im sure that me becoming a global elite is not a matter of IF but of WHEN will it happens. For the last 5 years i worked as hard as i could to upgrade myself so the kikes werent able to made me sell my linkies. I plan to continue to do this even if you are right and we hit 500 dollarinos. This is no more about holding Link or not, this is about preparing myself to support the Evolution growth of human race as a whole.

[Anonymous No.53071404]

>>53071053
Also this

[Anonymous No.53071433]

>>53071396
>Evolution growth of human race as a whole
Lol. It's a fund raising token for a price checker service that nobody exchanges dollars or eth to use...

[Anonymous No.53071445]

>>53071021
>>53071033
Ever since I bought Chainlink I felt my soul slowly leave my body. I'm like a person who is no longer sapient, nothing more than a collection of meat and preprogrammed directives. I'm no longer capable of making decisions, it's strange.. and it's like it comes from somewhere else. For example: something happens and I just act, I no longer think what's "right" or "wrong". Interestingly, I don't even believe in right or wrong anymore only better and worse.

It's like what happened to Phineas Gage. Possibly part of my prefrontal cortex has been irreparably damaged from trauma. My entire personality has changed since buying Link and becoming a marine. I am no longer the same person, my hopes, dreams, and wishes have all vanished. Now I only care about stress minimization and avoiding conflict.

I have nobody to blame but myself, although I'm no longer capable of blame as I can no longer think for myself. And the worst part? I actually like it. I mean, I didn't choose to, I was programmed to, and somehow it worked...

[Anonymous No.53072122]

>>53071021
Imagine thinking cbdc's are coming out anytime soon, holy shit

[Anonymous No.53072192]

>>53071036
>>53071137
Notice how these tranny fudders started using different filenames because some anons were fucking them up using warosu search lmao

[Anonymous No.53072574]

>>53072122
Who cares when they come out? As soon as Swift confirms Chainlink (on or before March 20th) it's bye bye supply as the big guns instantly buy everything Link the can grab. What do you think that'll do for the price? I really hope you don;t have any Link, but I know you probably do, since you're here seething about it. Unless you're a paid jeet or something. That would be funny.

[Anonymous No.53072602]

>>53072574
When March 20th comes and you're once again btfo, think of me telling you to jump off a bridge. There is ZERO (0) chance that SWIFT confirms LINK. Do you understand what ZERO means, cuck?

[Anonymous No.53072615]

>>53072192
>I'M LE SMART DETECTIVE UNCOVERING THE TRANNIES THAT ARE RAIDING 4CHANNEL

[Anonymous No.53072666]

>>53071021
Where are you pulling the number 2160 from?

[Anonymous No.53072676]

>>53072666
out of his ass, like all bagholders

[Anonymous No.53072679]

>>53072602
Dear God how angrily you screech. Ok, what other solution do you think they will employ for interoperability? Both Swift and the IMF's CEO have called for a solution to this. There literally are no other competitors. No one has bothered to try. Go on then.. tell us, since you're so certain? By the way, I have all day, so be prepared for me coming back to each and every lie and avoidance you make.

[Anonymous No.53072690]

>>53072615
How does it feel to have to manually change the image name everytime you post?

[Anonymous No.53072710]

>>53072690
>How does it feel to have to manually change the image name everytime you post?

[Anonymous No.53072773]

>>53072679
>what solution
why ask? it's on swift's website, they hired capgemini pajeets to code one

[Anonymous No.53072777]

>>53072602
^^^^^^^Hasn't got an answer to my straightforward question >>53072679 Quelle surprise, lads kek

[Anonymous No.53072808]

>>53071021
You stake all your links

You are your own fudder lmao

[Anonymous No.53072809]

>>53072773
Kek, nice of you to try and help your pal Beavis out. I think your answer says all we needed to hear. Thanks!

[Anonymous No.53072879]

>>53072809
great comeback bro, wow
https://www.swift.com/news-events/news/cbdcs-interoperability-5-key-takeaways-our-ground-breaking-experiments
>ctrl + f chainlink = 0 results
ctrl + capgemini = 1 result
I'm sure they're still under some NDA despite appearing on Smartcon lmao

[Anonymous No.53072905]

>>53071021
what does swift and cbdc?

[Anonymous No.53072943]

Everyone here hold Link.

[Anonymous No.53072945]

>>53072905
Here's your SWIFT bro

[Anonymous No.53072969]

>>53072943
lol no i like money

[Anonymous No.53073076]

>>53071036
>>53071137
>>53071053
>>53071354
pic related
then, and only then
will i consider link kill
until then i will keep buying and buying (i already have 14k staked with 2 wallets)
that's how shitty and obvious you are at your "job"

[Anonymous No.53073086]

>>53072879
>Yes! The winner is.... (cough) .... capgemini!
That's it? Is this what the 'competition' is? This is your answer? You really think for a nanosecond that the entire security of the world's international banking transactions is going to rely on this jeet outfit? KEKEKEK
OH
MY
GOD
I am going to be so rich. Pack your suitcases, boys. We're going somewhere exotic, and it ain't India lol

[Anonymous No.53073108]

>>53073086
look at all this unhinged screeching kek
>This is your answer
no, this is what SWIFT explicitly named as their chosen solution for interoperability of CBDCs
ngl, I enjoy watching you experiencing a literal mental breakdown over facts though

[Anonymous No.53073153]

>>53073086
btw, that "jeet outfit" seems to be generating bigger revenue than the entire market cap of Chainlink, lol

[Anonymous No.53073197]

>>53073086
what's the problem with cap? genuine question, I worked at capgemini france until recently
most coding is outsourced to india but they litterally have an army
btw if you can be arsed there are more details in the pdf on there
https://www.swift.com/swift-resource/251902/download
but I cba giving my personal info

[Anonymous No.53073212]

>>53073108
>explicitly named as their chosen solution for interoperability of CBDCs
How conveniently you neglect to mention that their 'solution' is but one of three, and we all know who the winner is going to be, don't we? Protip: it ain't number two.
Your fuddery attempt is above average, and ceratinly better than the other retards itt, but it's essentially weak, and all it does is prove how much time you invest in researching the Chainlink project. What can we take away from that? Well, it's not difficult, is it?

[Anonymous No.53073219]

>>53072574
Even if that were to happen (it won't) Sergey already has 350 mil LINK set aside specifically earmarked for enterprise use. So in that scenario there would be no effect on the actual market.

[Anonymous No.53073244]

>>53073212
>their 'solution' is but one of three
what is this head canon bro? where do you even get this stuff? people are throwing sources at your face and you simply disregard them only to spout nonsensical garbage speculation
unironically off yourself

[Anonymous No.53073256]

>>53072679
There are 3 solutions on the table. LINK is 1 of 3. They will not be the one. There is no scaling, regulations involving crypto, and it's too expensive to deploy

[Anonymous No.53073263]

>>53073219
Are you so dim you don't see how a 100% Swift confirmation would trigger a massive buy signal for Link? Wowawoowa

[Anonymous No.53073302]

>>53073153
BTFO. Wow, just like that. Imagine calling Capgemini a jeet outfit while the real jeet outfit, LINK, flounders down to $4 a token. Pretty soon some shithead will dump whatever early tokens they got and this thing will be trading for a buck fifty. LINK is about to be curb stomped even further

[Anonymous No.53073327]

>>53073244
>where do you even get this stuff?
Oh, babes. Must i handhold you all the way? You didn't even research your own source, did you? That's a little disappointing.
Alright
ctrf-f 'BIS multi-CBDC Model 2'
and click on the little linky winky. There you go. For all the good it'll do you. Your sort never capitulate.
You should read the associated docs before you go rushing in like a bull, sonny.

[Anonymous No.53073331]

>>53071021
>coindes with March for when SWIFT comes out with their CBDC’s
You’re full of shit pajeet.

[Anonymous No.53073395]

>>53073327
https://www.bis.org/publ/othp38.pdf
>ctrl + f chainlink = 0 results
despite the fact that this particular document doesn't mention chainlink at all, in the context of the SWIFT article it clearly refers to capgemini, you absolute retarded (paid) shill
here's the entire part:
>working in collaboration with Capgemini, we built a simulation of Swift’s enhanced platform and a connector gateway that, when combined, are capable of linking CBDC and existing payment systems up at the technical level. Our experimental solution is capable of solving for BIS multi-CBDC Model 2, which foresees the interlinking of multiple CBDC systems via a shared technical interface.
also keep ignoring that you disingenuous filthy liar>>53073302

[Anonymous No.53073415]

>>53073263
Yeah, I'm sure there would be an epic speculatory pump. But even if it did a 5-10x, it would still be lower than many people's initial buy in price. And the reality is that LINK price doesn't need to be that high in order for it to function for an institution like SWIFT. LINK will simply never have enough hype to hit 3 or 4 digits.

[Anonymous No.53073436]

>>53073415
It's almost down 40% from staking launch, so much for muh cryptoeconomic security

Facts are >>53073395 is right, Chainlink submitted a proposal and got btfo by better competition that doesn't utilize a literal FTT/LUNA model

[Anonymous No.53073479]

>>53073395
Oh dear.
And who do you think solved models 1 and 3?
If you can't follow breadcrumbs, I ain't gonna help you any further. Project what you like onto it. We'll see what happens come March, won't we?
Regarding >>53073302 Don't you know how organisations go about selecting their contractors? It's the same way they interview several candidates for job positions, despite knowing who will be selected before the interviews take place. It's a screen. You know it, I know it, and the entire western world knows it. Yet it still happens. But let's pretend you didn't know that. Sounds like a good game. Jeez, you're an awkward retard.

[Anonymous No.53073492]

>>53073479
spoken like a true riddler larper
do you have any twitter handles by any chance?

[Anonymous No.53073518]

>>53073492
Yes. It's WAGMIbutYoureNot

[Anonymous No.53073544]

>>53073479
Yes, we will see what happens in March. How many other dates have you chainshitters hyped up only for them to end up as disappointments.

[Anonymous No.53073560]

>>53073518
cool
btw thanks for conceding and resorting to vague statements and meme dates, it really drives the fudder's point home

[Anonymous No.53073603]

>>53071021
I sold to tax loss harvest. Somebody please dump the price and fill my limit

[Anonymous No.53073616]

>>53072122
Look up project cedar dumbass

[Anonymous No.53073633]

>>53072945
>you vill make it but you vill be publicly humiliated for years

[Anonymous No.53073649]

>>53073560
>meme dates
March 20th is Swift's own date, as stated clearly in their documentation.
Really? You this ill-prepared all you did was read that one pdf you posted and nothing else? Go and tell your boss he needs to spend more on training. You and your little pals are hopeless.

[Anonymous No.53073715]

>>53073479
These guys are right
>>53073395
>>53073415
>>53073436
While you linkshits are huffing on breadcrumbs and hopiums your coin is crashing to atl

Seriously, who even uses chainlink? For what purpose? What’s the token even for? And imagine staking your worthless coins for… I’m sorry what is staking even for? Eth pumped from $500 to $4k yet link is struggling to keep $5. It this doesn’t constitute as failure idk what is

[Anonymous No.53073762]

>>53071021
>>53072574
>he really thought banks and central banks would hire a cayman islands nobody for settling international transactions

[Anonymous No.53073777]

>>53073649
and what do chainshit have to do with any of that. It will turn out to be another nothingburger just like their alleged involvement with arbitroon. Now fuck off our board, chainlink labs shill.

[Anonymous No.53073825]

Kek the fud itt is immense! You lot really are going for it, aren't you? This is absolutely proof positive we're getting close. I've so hit a nerve with the March 20th thing, haven't I? Oh boy it's so happening! Thanks for the confirmation, retards. You lot ought to spend more time on co-ordination. When you all come out of the woodwork at once it's so obvious lol
How wonderful this is. 2023 is going to be the best of years. Thank you , thank you, thank you.

[Anonymous No.53073869]

>>53073825
>Three more months
>Trust the plan
You are acting completely deranged, please remember to reply to our posts individually. We are paid per (you).

[Anonymous No.53073974]

>>53071396
>i trust you are right
Right about what? He didn't say anything or make any prognostications. Just another thread with made up numerology. Happens all the time with chainlink threads, and they never amount to anything. They just give a vague date, on which nothing happens, and if they bother to come back then they'll say shit like "you're not paying attention" to make other people feel dumb for noticing that nothing is different.

[Anonymous No.53074002]

>>53073869
>deranged
Kek that's rich, seeing as it took about 10 of you and you still didn't put up a half-convincing argument between the lot of you. You should get in touch with Jonathan Ehrenfeld Solé of Swift and tell him he's deranged, too kek
tldr: you just lost this. all of you lol

[Anonymous No.53074150]

bump
I heard SpaceX uses chainlink too but they won't admit it on their website or documentation as is the custom

[Anonymous No.53074198]

>>53074150
>Spacex
Kek that tells me all I need to know about you, my friend

[Anonymous No.53074216]

>>53071021
I don't understand the significance of 2160 or 5.9. Please explain.

[Anonymous No.53074998]

>>53074002
Cope more LINKcel

[Anonymous No.53075072]

>>53072666
Checked. 216 is an important esoteric number.

[Anonymous No.53075132]

>>53074998
>ignores point and posts a screengrap he made of someone elses rubbish fud instead, completely burying head in sand
Kek you don't even know who Ehrenfeld Solé is, do you? Oh my...

[Anonymous No.53075144]

>>53071021
>2160 divided by 365 is 5.9…
Yeah $5.9 is where we'll stay. Look I want to believe too but it's clear they are going to keep us from enjoying making it by delaying as long as possible. I'm trying to focus on getting /out/ and living my life for a change instead of waiting forever. I only come to /biz/ for anime tiddies anymore.

[Anonymous No.53075199]

>>53073825
You should have seen the smile on my face reading all the fud here. Obviously you’re correct and we are getting close. It feels so inorganic in here KEK. Why are the fudsisters so mean?

[Anonymous No.53075200]

>>53075132
There is no winning with you people, so I'm simply going to call you an incel LINKtard (because you are) and move on. If I gave away that I knew who he was (I do), then you'd be questioning why I have such intimate knowledge of the project as a "fudder". If I don't know who he is, then you'd hold it over my head and act like you have some inside information I don't. Get fucked LINKcel.

[Anonymous No.53075296]

>>53075200
>I have no argument, so I’ll resort to ad hominem
Every time

[Anonymous No.53075328]

>>53075296
You very conveniently decided not to respond to my post >>53073415

What the hell is Chainlink Labs paying you guys for?

[Anonymous No.53075399]

>muh cbdc
never happening linkies hahaha

[Anonymous No.53075425]

>>53075200
Seethe is absolute lmao

[Anonymous No.53075432]

>>53075296
>>53075425
Here come the 1pbtids

[Anonymous No.53075475]

>>53073415
>>53075328
>But even if it did a 5-10x, it would still be lower than many people's initial buy in price.
Burden of proof is on you. Let’s see you back this up. Remember, this is a link board. What makes you think most people holding here bought most of their stack after aug 2020?
>And the reality is that LINK price doesn't need to be that high in order for it to function for an institution like SWIFT.
Ok? Care to explain. It’s not like this hasn’t been debated already hundreds of times since link was first mentioned here.
>LINK will simply never have enough hype to hit 3 or 4 digits.
Nice speculation, how am I supposed to debate you here? this has been mentioned thousands of times already.

[Anonymous No.53075491]

>>53075432
You hold link

[Anonymous No.53075519]

>>53072676
No sirs plz buy my bags they will be worth a billion six gorillion digital dollars soon. Must buy now though, rocket leaves tomorrow!

[Anonymous No.53075551]

>>53075200
So, why DO you have such intimate knowledge of the project as a "fudder"?

[Anonymous No.53075591]

>>53075519
funnily enough, the cbdc swift project has been implemented by actual indians if I get this thread right.

[Anonymous No.53075594]

>>53075551
>did you just refuse to buy my bags and my statement that my bags will be worth a bazillion gorillion shekels in just a month before the rocket launches tomorrow?
>FUDDER!!!!
AHhahahahahHAHahahhahahaha. Retarded pajeet streetshitter-tier crypto shills still trying to shill and behave like it's 2017 when very few people in the world knew much of anything about cryptocurrency. Whats your wallet anon, do you need a few bucks? Here, I'll give you a few bucks. I know times are tough now for pajeet street shitter poorfags shilling their literal who crypto project littered with disgusting pajeet code.

[Anonymous No.53075688]

>>53075594
^^^ is he okay?

[Anonymous No.53075840]

>>53075199
>why are the so mean?
IKR? I saw on Twitter today someone talking about the recent Link fud, how it lacks any humour or creativeness, and instead sounds like 'a 13 yr-old edgelord'; which I thought was a fairly good description.
And yes, it feels close now. Will Sergey put up a video on the 1st again? Hope so.

[Anonymous No.53075877]

Was CCIP supposed to come out this year? I sold my LINK last year and haven't really followed it much.

[Anonymous No.53075923]

>>53075840
>Will Sergey put up a video on the 1st again?
The markets are going to crash again if he does.

[Anonymous No.53076668]

>>53075199
>>53073825

So what are you guys gonna do when march hits and nothing happens just like all the other times people made predictions? Pull another one out of your asses?

[Anonymous No.53077459]

>>53071021
>coindes
>for when SWIFT comes out with their CBDC’s
your post is full of literally wrong information and misspellings. Not sure what "coindes" is. Also, swift is 100% not coming out with any CBDCs, they have 0 part to play in CBDCs. Swift is the company who created the (same name)swift messaging system for banks. Swift is used when banks transfer funds to each other. CBDCs, in the name, tell you who is goign to issue them....central bank digital currency. If anyone is going to issue a CBDC it will be the FED or power will be given back to the US treasury. The same thing will apply to any other country, their central bank will be the issuer. You would understand all of this clearly if you were paying attention to anything that XSG has said.

[Anonymous No.53077574]

>>53077459
>XSG
Thanks for sharing, go back to your containment thread

[Anonymous No.53077678]

>>53075840
The link fud is top-tier based and pure /biz/. The chainlink labs shills are cringe and gay.

[Anonymous No.53077882]

>>53077574
nice rebuttal. Its very telling when no one wants to even engage with the info that has been found out. Everything that has been discussed as going to happen in the XSG threads has either happened, or were on the verge of it happening, the only thing wrong in the XSG info is the timing. I cant even count how many times link shills have shown "proof" of greater adoption only to be slapped down by the company that supposedly is adopting chainlink when they clarify they are actually using the system in the way people are trying to say they are. I say it everytime I can, anyone rooting for any single chain is a retard. If the fact that currently companies all run on different software because no one can agree on what to use isnt enough of a clue to you that when we switch to crypto systems, well still be using different systems for everything, then I am not sure investing is for you. Each of the ISO20022 tokens will be utilized in some form (why would they work on the new standard that would help phase out use of their tokens?). Chainlink will likely be one of the ways real world data is relayed to blockchains, however the constant shill that chainlink is going to run literally everything, is pure fantasy that doesnt hold up to any level of scrutiny.

[Anonymous No.53077890]

>>53077882
>they are actually using the system in the way people are trying to say they are
should say "not actually" in there.

[Anonymous No.53078102]

>>53072122
CBDCs are going to be brought in with shock and awe, just like covid lockdowns and vaccines. A gradual rollout won't work on normie boomers who prefer doing things the way they're used to.

[Anonymous No.53078616]

>>53078102
people wont even realize that we are using CBDCs instead of the current dollar. Banks will be the ones to control this entire system. Instead of your bank account consisting of nothing but 1,s and 0,s in a spreadsheet, they will be wallets connected to whatever blockchain is chosen. Signing transactions will be as simple as putting your pin into an ATM terminal, possibly using the exact same debit cards we are using now (the chip is the same chip already found in physical crytpo NFC cards). The only thing that *might* be different is if you have access to your wallet similar to how metamask works, so you can take your CBDC and use them in government approved protocols.

[Anonymous No.53079308]

>>53073256
Who are the other 2?

[Anonymous No.53079358]

>>53072666
checked 216.
2160 years in each astrological constellation. times by twelve to get the great year