[Pre-ICO Aidrop/Poll] NEED OPINIONS BEFORE ICO - DAPP LAUNCH

[Anonymous No.27594109]

Hi anons,
oldfag dev here,

I've worked for several months on a project now. I'm going to release it in the coming days, and will do an ICO. I will do some AMA and some threads here on biz, because many anons here a actually okay !

Pitch:
I will release the project concept later but here a small pitch:
A community-based interactive project, with a modern & slick UX/website. The product is aimed for marketing, publicity, trolling, shilling campaigns, fun, etc. The product generates value from the platform activity and it is redistributed to its token holders as weekly dividends. It has staking, moderation and other simples mechanisms.

ICO will be as fair as possible, earliest communications will be here on /biz/, as a strategic choice. Hope you anons, appreciate it.

I need to do a polling before releasing the testnet and starting the ICO campaign.

IF YOU WANT TO PARTICIPATE, PLEASE PROVIDE ETH ADDRESS BELOW. An airdrop will happen for the first 30 answers on launch.

Q1: Building only on Ethereum is super costly for users right now. Would you use the dapp if built on xDai chain? It requires users to convert ERC20 DAI to xDai through the bridge. Do you think it will hurt adoption? ETH gas fees are so high, I'm affraid it requires either a L2 or another scalable L1.

Q2: would you use the product if it was built on Cardano, Polkadot or other L1?

Q3: would you enjoy a dividend-based staking mechanism, where you receive, at the end of each week, some dividend in DAI, from value generated on the platform, additionally with token staking rewards?

Q4: we think offering a metamask-based access is critical to reach a broader audience. Do you agree? Would you use something else if the dapp requires it?

The airdrop will be 100-150 tokens. Thank you all for your participation, improving this future product today. Cheers anons

[Anonymous No.27594203]

bump.

please paste your Ethereum address for the coming airdrop, we appreciate your time and efforts anons.

[Anonymous No.27594291]

bump, ANONS WE NEED YOU

[Anonymous No.27594109,1]

0x15C8E0A7e566bb60DF0222DDd3F921071834ce6a

[Anonymous No.27594432]

Wallet -- 0x54CA738D6c109004f9b857D0F5Cb98cded352F3b

Answers- q1, how much cheaper is xdai? Cause the gas fees are stupid on eth imo

Q2- yes, im interested in cardano and polka as well so would be keen to see how it pans out.

Q3- yes providing its fair and evenly spread imo.

Q4- currently using metamask as it seems to have big adoption, however would use something else providing its got a decent rep

[Anonymous No.27594588]

>>27594432
Thanks anon for your answer.

1: xDai fees are $0.000021 USD per tx, so much much lower than single digits / double digits eth fees.
3: it will be fair, dividends % will be proportional to staked token amount

[Anonymous No.27594651]

bump

[Anonymous No.27594732]

>>27594588

Me again, yeah thats hella cheaper so id give it a shot, more coins too! Imagine how much youd be losing on gas on eth :(

[Anonymous No.27594759]

0xf894106cC93eb541141Cc798ae154Cb9A7CE2FF6

[Anonymous No.27594843]

>>27594732
The goal was to use ETH to enable easy dapp interactions but fees are too high. We really hesitate between having data payments in ADA if on Cardano, or using xDai, or Optimism.

[Anonymous No.27594846]

Side note - you got a telegram or group anywhere? Interested. Only anon here :(

[Anonymous No.27594858]

>>27594109
Wallet - 0xE94Fa3F1f928D1ff84161EE4E3aBB07b769E7a64

Q1 - do you already have a website for us to see the project (or the concept)?

[Anonymous No.27594918]

>>27594759
You have to answer a minimum to my questions, or provide good insights, so it's a win-win for you and our dev team. Thank you anon

[Anonymous No.27594996]

>>27594858
We have but will release it with a working testnet release. That's why we are doing this event today, to make a proper scalable product before marketing it here and (later) on other places.

[Anonymous No.27595103]

L2 is extremely important but possibly not fully fleshed out for an initial product.

Competition of other l1 tokens is great and will force eth to create innovation or lose strength. Currently it is the right choice IMO

Having dividends be able to be payed out in dai seems reasonable

Metamask is the industry standard I would say, so yeah try it out.
Anyway good luck, go disrupt a market with some frens

0x85AA5438375DA2fFd183e215c3c277Cb29e5b4c9

[Anonymous No.27595117]

>>27594843
Fair enough! Happy to be part of the feedback and hopefully part of the airdrop! Any idea what the total amt of coins would be?

[Anonymous No.27595128]

>>27594918
Q1: Yes I would use a xDai-chain tool

Q2: Yes I would use on Polkadot/Cardano.

Q3: Yes, let us stake our coins.

Q4: I prefer Metamask.

[Anonymous No.27595208]

Q1: Building only on Ethereum is super costly for users right now. Would you use the dapp if built on xDai chain? It requires users to convert ERC20 DAI to xDai through the bridge. Do you think it will hurt adoption? ETH gas fees are so high, I'm affraid it requires either a L2 or another scalable L1.


Yes definitely. Stake is a good solution and was proposed for Reddit implementation.

Q2: would you use the product if it was built on Cardano, Polkadot or other L1?

Don‘t know. Probably yes. In the end it depends what content your site will have. Normal people don’t want to know how the site is build.

Q3: would you enjoy a dividend-based staking mechanism, where you receive, at the end of each week, some dividend in DAI, from value generated on the platform, additionally with token staking rewards?

For tax reason I would like a weekly AirDrop

Q4: we think offering a metamask-based access is critical to reach a broader audience. Do you agree? Would you use something else if the dapp requires it?

Nope with metamask you also can connect your ledger.
So go with mm.


0x23d1b1D48a80Be2AbA86014deB9ff42B71Aa76CB

[Anonymous No.27595242]

>>27595103
thank you.

Our strategy was to attempt to stay on the ETH ecosystem, for Uniswap (and its popularity among a lot of users) for our token, and having a L2 to provide a really usable dapp. We are very attracted to Cardano or Algorand, but we fear that, as we wanna release the product in the coming weeks, not having the token on Uniswap will be an adoption issue?

[Anonymous No.27595354]

0xd122F6E7824cD97A2f457Ba1fc18CA8DA3807FFd

I would definitely use an app built on xdai chain. I believe fees would be next to nothing on there.

[Anonymous No.27595390]

I don't mind if it is built on the DAI chain
I do hodl and stake cardano so this would be ok
This is not important as long as the tokenomics are good
Yes metamask is mainstream and is really what most people uses
Wallet- 0x9f2a67c3287c8810Ff9A07CFcc25cA95aC6E3Fe2

[Anonymous No.27595469]

>>27595117
Airdrop will be >100 tokens.
TOKEN SUPPLY WILL BE 1M coins. 75% distributed after ICO. Thank you for your enthusiams anon
>>27595128
thank you.

> Don‘t know. Probably yes. In the end it depends what content your site will have. Normal people don’t want to know how the site is build.
The content of the website has monetized interactions at its core, and we think that the choice of the native token used for payments (ADA, xDai, DOT, USDC) is critical.
> For tax reason I would like a weekly AirDrop
Noted.

[Anonymous No.27595525]

>>27595354
Adding to this, I am unfamiliar with products built on Cardano, dot, etc but if the fundamentals and vision of the project interested me it wouldn't stop me from participating.

[Anonymous No.27595535]

Q1: If there's need for number of transactions to use the platform, I'd go for the L2. The converting process can be made quite pleasant, if you do a nice UI/UX.

Q2: Polkadot would be a good choice too I think, not so hyped about Cardano...

Q3: Yep, that would be cool

Q4: Metamask is THE Defi wallet right now, I wouldn't risk any other options if you want to reach broader audience.

[Anonymous No.27595599]

Interesting OP. here are some answers.

1) Honestly, probably not as I like having everything in one place/chain
2) Might be willing to give it a shot since I hear a lot about these particular projects.
3) Yep
4) I do aree - whether I use something else would depend on what. As Q2, those are names I hear floating about a lot so might be interested in trying out

0xC10645fC4b4Ac70364338f2934470423998507c2

[Anonymous No.27595602]

>>27595525
even if you have to buy the native asset of the underlying chain, like ADA or using the bridge to get xDai from DAI on Ethereum?

thanks a lot anon

[Anonymous No.27595610]

>>27595535
0x024FD67BF12D84DF4E73c753B2275DbE938A072C

Thanks in advance anon and good luck with the development.

[Anonymous No.27595632]

1 the fees are not so high and relevant yet, dont care
2 eth only matters
3 yes
4 i mostly use metamask, got used to

0xf894106cC93eb541141Cc798ae154Cb9A7CE2FF6

[Anonymous No.27595665]

>>27595610
>>27595599

thank you anons

[Anonymous No.27595670]

>>27594109
0x6332914573DCa2A54df3AaB5f65c76bEC1c15468

Air drop soilder

[Anonymous No.27595719]

>>27594109

A1: Probably not, not familiar with this at all.

A2: Absolutely Cardano yes, probably not anything else to be honest. I wouldn't even consider anything else.

A3: Yes for certain

A4: I use Yoroi for ADA . Gas fees in Metamask or ridiculous.

[Anonymous No.27595729]

>>27594109
0xd1aC46fF6c419c1f4A4005069DB9f55020A11433

Gl anon

[Anonymous No.27595741]

>>27595632
> the fees are not so high and relevant yet, dont care
but in our usecase, some transactions could cost $100 of fees, even though the tx value is in the hundreds of $$, we feel like that it is a dealbreaker. Thank you for your input

[Anonymous No.27595853]

>>27595741
right
but i mean we are far from adoption so the fees are still low

[Anonymous No.27595885]

>>27595719
interesting opinion, thanks, don't forget your ETH address for airdrop

[Anonymous No.27595987]

>>27595853
so this is even more frightening is the number of ETH users doubles this year, aha. Thanks

[Anonymous No.27596016]

0x22Dcb8CC118DE785f76f9A402662A608f5e86dC3

Q1: I don't mind. Yes, it will hurt, but what can you do.

Q2: Depends on how good it seems, but might as well.

Q3: Yes, definitely.

Q4: I would rather use metamask only for simplicity's sake.

[Anonymous No.27596040]

1. yes
2. yes
3. yes
4. yes

0xD1002D58f5fC59671B8e7DC1ed87e8f04c25bcE5

Good luck OP.

[Anonymous No.27596050]

0x56698BAc7CF91958CFbce043BBa5ba2B6521b18c

Q1 - yes i would love to use if built on xDai, but i think you're right it would hurt adoption. I think ETH is a safe bet, but if adoption isn't projected to be an issue I would definitely go for xDai

Q2 - yes, both cardano and polkadot would be good

Q3 - I would enjoy it but it wouldn't be a deal-breaker. staking rewards are fine enough

Q4 - YES metamask is essential, arguably more critical for adoption than Q1

[Anonymous No.27596055]

Gimme free shit at this adress thank you

0x4d6be128ff2206bed2d260bcb65e7576e2b2b148

q1: high fees are an issue, a big one, but i know only eth for the moment
q2: don't know these tokens well
q3 absolutely
q4 i don't like metamask

[fren01 No.27596091]

Q1: Yes xDai is sweeet
Q2: Polkadot maybe
Q3: Yes, dividend in dai/xdai is sweet tooo
Q4: Metamask ftw

0x0d03F03b39D6884332Aba91577cF309F51a55A84

good luck with your project anon

[Anonymous No.27596094]

>>27596016
>>27596040
thanks anons

[Anonymous No.27596184]

>>27594109

Interesting so
Q1 Eth has definetly become a huge problem as to where its hurting alot of people, this might effect adoption a bit but i think it would be better long term.
Q2 never used cardano but familiar with polka and open to other coins.
Q3 Thats a good and interesting model that ive been seeing discussed and tried more and more, not sure about efficacy but it is hype generating for sure, especially with the familiar normie words.
Q4 Yes, its p much the only mainstream wallet.

0x4C588f00ba36E325A7dE2dc350B748E6A0FF3CEB

Hoping the best for the project.

[Anonymous No.27596187]

0x0D93f1669a7B0718F289A089e3Be897D50203bdD

Cheaper fees is better as long as its still adoptable and not too much of an issue.

Yes i would still use providing fundamentals are good.

As long as evenly spread. Staking is good.

Metamask is good imo but if you can suggest one that suits the coin id be happy to try

[Anonymous No.27596193]

>>27594109
0xde54Ef03e50af37170B3798797Ae556Cf3FE163f

[Anonymous No.27596206]

>>27594109
Q1: That would probably hurt initial influx of users since it's too COMPLICATED to use a bridge, but if the dapp takes off, shouldn't be an issue really, especially if retard youtubers make step-by-step explanation
Q2: Yes, but preferably not Polkadot
Q3: More tokens > less tokens. But depends on tokenomics obviously. Is it infinite supply? Is it fixed supply? etc etc
Q4: Metamask makes access retard-proof. A website should work too. Browser plugin would be ASS though

Good luck with the project, fren
0x019dc1E31a836835eFE832377e74AE2982391f42

[Anonymous No.27596282]

>>27594109

0x01E29CF28F4c2cE5Ccb0493E14E95D4Dc55Eb050

1. eth fees are mostly fine for me but would like to save some on gas
2. eth/dot
3. yes
4. metamask is simple and popular

[Anonymous No.27596289]

0x94198841BbBf1e5745FbBD950d510d6263Aee9C1

[Anonymous No.27596355]

thanks everyone, interesting to see the large majority in favor for metamask. Also a large amount okay with using Cardano, and Yoroi instead of metamask.

[Anonymous No.27596387]

>>27596193

>Q1: Eth gas fees are a serious issue.
>Q2: I'm interested in Cardano. So that would be good.
>Q3: in dai/xdai would be cool.
>Q4: Metamask is good.

Forgot responses.
Good luck with your project!

[Anonymous No.27596405]

>>27594109
0x79Db32ffAEa09a58b1A0C7050f94CC3e058a611F

1: smart idea, the gas fees are murder and exchanges are becoming more welcoming each day

2:cardano would be preferred of the choices

3: Yes, any kind of farming or staking is the rage at the moment and I would highly encourage and participate myself.

4: while not necessary it would bring in a much wider user base and those who see it could easily set up an account to access via MetaMask.

[Anonymous No.27596411]

>>27594109
0x7397Bb578569A307D404c4a6650AE9eE569396B9

[Anonymous No.27596541]

>>27594109
0xD1Bf4F6482F011D4Da45053b6e7dc1B27760ffbf

Q1: I'd prefer MATIC since most of my Dapps are starting to use it but I would use xDai.
Q2: Yes, DOT or AVAX
Q3: Yes, or NFT prizes
Q4: Yes, would use Metamask or Polkadot etc

[Anonymous No.27596550]

>>27594109
0x8f4D9943938bcF33315e668Cd8D65543c4e39d98 (not very active one desu)

Q1: I might use it, though I would hesitate a bit since I don't like to ape into anything (or install new stuff for that case).
Q2: I would prefer Cardano, but just because it's what I hold. I don't particularly like Hosk, so Polka might be better given current hype. Anyway I think you picked the best out of "eth killers" bunch.
Q3: Yes, a weekly dividend seems fine. I would go for a system where dividends accumulate and then user chooses to claim them at some point (covering the fees), if that's what you are looking for here.
Q4: Metamask is quite advanced yet very user friendly at this stage. I have tried a few other wallets, among them Exodus desktop and Cardano new browser based wallet also seemed fine.

Cheers!

[Anonymous No.27596673]

>>27595242
Is the said platform going to be imperative in the earlier days? It may take time to catch a real user base. I’ve seen many projects out in this kind of work and falter to slow adoption. Could that be the case here and are there contingencies?

[Anonymous No.27596679]

kewl bro!
0x62071130965FD7454D8Ff3298C600d211DE36C62

[Anonymous No.27596712]

>>27596550
> Yes, a weekly dividend seems fine. I would go for a system where dividends accumulate and then user chooses to claim them at some point (covering the fees), if that's what you are looking for here.

If we build on a scalable layer, this will be the way it's handled, yes.
> Metamask is quite advanced yet very user friendly at this stage

But would you spend the little time that's needed to add the xDai chain on Metamask and switch on that when using the dapp? Bonus question

[Anonymous No.27596718]

>>27596411
>>27594109
>Q1: Building only on Ethereum is super costly for users right now. Would you use the dapp if built on xDai chain? It requires users to convert ERC20 DAI to xDai through the bridge. Do you think it will hurt adoption? ETH gas fees are so high, I'm affraid it requires either a L2 or another scalable L1.
ETH gas fees might be high, but not so high
>Q2: would you use the product if it was built on Cardano, Polkadot or other L1?
Maybe polkadot, stay away from cardano
>Q3: would you enjoy a dividend-based staking mechanism, where you receive, at the end of each week, some dividend in DAI, from value generated on the platform, additionally with token staking rewards?
Maybe, dont know if many would be interested something like that. Cryptos move fast
>Q4: we think offering a metamask-based access is critical to reach a broader audience. Do you agree? Would you use something else if the dapp requires it?
Metamask is simple enough

0x7397Bb578569A307D404c4a6650AE9eE569396B9

[Anonymous No.27596804]

>>27596679
Q1: fees bro
Q2: ADA
Q3: dividensds baby, make sure that users are able to save up their dividends.
Q4:Metamask = easypeasy

[Anonymous No.27596911]

I'd like to add another extra question for everyone who said metamask is good.

xDai chain requires users to add the xDai chain on it, by doing a little setup, it's not hard, but not "one click". Is that realistically okay?

[Anonymous No.27596939]

>>27594109
1 yes
2 yes
3 yes
4 MetaMask works well

0x6332914573DCa2A54df3AaB5f65c76bEC1c15468

[Anonymous No.27596950]

0xf20636a5a8808e5c6669FF65C2E036D98bBF6fc5

Q1
Yes, because the gas fees on ETH are unreal

Q2
depends on what would be more benefiting long term. But yea, why not.

Q3
Of course, that would obviously bring you even more customers

Q4
definitely
metamask is a better version of paypal

[Anonymous No.27597064]

>>27594846
I'll make posts here again when launch, with a tg.

[Anonymous No.27597089]

>>27596911
People are lazy these day but it would weed out those who only wish to ride an early pump. It may slow growth but it will help provide crucial stability.

[Anonymous No.27597096]

>>27594109

Q1 Yes
Q2: I guess
Q3: Yes
Q4: Yes, I don't mind

0x993B848b5911b66200a97C6DbE3a26AEC6418297

[Anonymous No.27597115]

>>27594109

1. I would use it if the product was cool enough, or seemed likely enough to be profitable.
2. Same as above.
3. Sure, that's a fun mechanism, but it will still revolve around the community. If the atmosphere sucks a few DAI wouldn't motivate me to contribute.
4. I think metamask makes a huge difference, yeah. Again, it would have to be really good to get me to bother using something less tried and true.

0x2eFF2beb97a5Ffa2dDa699725587B860CEE926f7

[Anonymous No.27597122]

>>27594109
1: I would use it, Gas fees are annoying, but you shouldnt do crypto if gas fees are a problem

2: I would use it personally

3: Yes, that would be amazing actually

4: I kinda agree, metamask is very accesable, so go for it


Thanks OP!

eth: 0x996b19dfa656813C98ECEda62fDa279a26739581

[Anonymous No.27597148]

>>27594109
Cringe.

Just ape AAVE.

[Anonymous No.27597153]

>>27597089
thanks a lot for this insight.

[Anonymous No.27597205]

>>27596911
I think that's still easier than another wallet

[Anonymous No.27597286]

0x985b8664E3bC8f663389118B63be8e55679A7997

tnx fren

[Anonymous No.27597326]

>>27596911
if it would take too many "clicks" and wouldn't be user friendly, then I'd think about that
the easiest, most comfortable and fastest method will always win tho

[Anonymous No.27597378]

>>27594109
kill yourself for creating erc20 cancer and not an actual coin, you talentless nigger

[Anonymous No.27597411]

>>27597122
Oh anon! Could you please put it on this adres instead if you'd like to gift me some. Its my metamask, so that would be easier for me:

0x3833e016fF4F7a074d1826926F2c4FDa9F1e761d

[Anonymous No.27597483]

>>27594109
Hook it up comet bro
0xC2B3F5C4Ae34CD10bbc83B797a5BB77765A40853

[Anonymous No.27597536]

0xbb93b404c3227d52435712C78bD8d453F3AA5085

Q1
Yeah, I already use xDai and have deployed contracts there
Q2
Maybe Polkadot
Q3
Yes
Q4
I definitely think Metamask integration will help any token out greatly

[Anonymous No.27597543]

>>27594109
Q1: might be, but gas fees are fucking ass, so the hurdle could be one that is taken by quite a few

Q2: no experience yet, open for it tho

Q3: yes

Q4: using metamask rn, but only because im comfortable with it, open for anything new

0xb1dE806cC14624Ab6Ec9AFe4AA8C6a60dd93DB3f

[Anonymous No.27597582]

>>27597411
sure.

Thanks everyone for all the answers, that's great.
Seem like, even though Cardano is attractive, xDai chain would be simple enough and would allow people to use metamask for dapp use and metamask/uniswap to buy the project token. It's likely the most "simple" onboarding, from what I see.

[Anonymous No.27597755]

wallet: 0x985b8664E3bC8f663389118B63be8e55679A7997

Q1: Building on Ethereum alone is very expensive for users right now. Would you use the dapp if built on xDai chain? It requires users to convert ERC20 DAI to xDai via the bridge. Do you think it will harm the adoption? ETH gas rates are so high that I'm afraid it requires an L2 or another scalable L1.
RQ1: It is beneficial to save the cost of gas, but the truth is that many like to stay on ethereum because they are habitual and this is the output of DeFi's success on blockchain ethereum despite the cost.


Q2: Would you use the product if it was built on Cardano, Polkadot or other L1?
RQ2: maybe pokadot. cardan no.

Q3: Would you like a dividend-based staking mechanism, where you receive, at the end of each week, some dividend in DAI, from the value generated on the platform, in addition to rewards for token staking?
RQ3: Yes, it's interesting.

Q4: We believe offering metamask-based access is critical to reaching a wider audience. Do you agree? Would you use something else if the dapp requires it? RQ4: Metamask is fundamental, I agree.

[Anonymous No.27597766]

>>27596911
Realistically it's okay considering you don't need another wallet, but people are lazy you know.

[Anonymous No.27597787]

Q1: That would probably hurt initial influx of users since it's too COMPLICATED to use a bridge, but if the dapp takes off, shouldn't be an issue really, especially if retard youtubers make step-by-step explanation
Q2: Yes, but preferably not Polkadot
Q3: More tokens > less tokens. But depends on tokenomics obviously. Is it infinite supply? Is it fixed supply? etc etc
Q4: Metamask makes access retard-proof. A website should work too. Browser plugin would be ASS though
0xc829BBeeCB7510aE9fD0124198dfC98F294E4304

[Anonymous No.27597814]

>>27597483
Here are my answers
Q1: ETH has the market cap and reach for a community. It’s the best worst choice right now. You could always migrate later.

Q2: would you use the product if it was built on Cardano, Polkadot or other L1?

Yes.

Q3: would you enjoy a dividend-based staking mechanism, where you receive, at the end of each week, some dividend in DAI, from value generated on the platform, additionally with token staking rewards?

Yes as long as it was clear and fair

Q4: we think offering a metamask-based access is critical to reach a broader audience. Do you agree? Would you use something else if the dapp requires it?

What else would work on ETH? You need to make a Dapp that people can play with. That simple.

[Anonymous No.27597825]

0x6E82554d7C496baCcc8d0bCB104A50B772d22a1F

Q1
I like xDai and it's gonna gain traction. look at darkforest.
Q2
Uhh, no experience with these.
Q3
Of course, who wouldn't?
Q4
I use metamask day-to-day but would be open to other web3 providers too, i guess

[Anonymous No.27598019]

10 more answers and I'll stop bumping the thread.
Thanks a lot everyone, that's amazing.

Watch your addresses and watch for future threads.

[Anonymous No.27598261]

>>27597825
> I use metamask day-to-day but would be open to other web3 providers too, i guess

interesting, we'll advertise Nifty wallet as well, if we chose xDai chain

[Anonymous No.27598289]

>>27594109
0x6D8CD92d33ECD99A865db0aea21643359e5D2e91

Q1 - I feel the gas fees will definitely hurt it, so I feel another chain might be wise. Waiting for ETH2.0 doesn't seem wise considering the wait still ahead.

Q2 - I would not be opposed to it, if the project is worth it.

Q3 - Mate, I would stake for sure. It's what I'm doing with GRT as well.

Q4 - Please use Metamask. Keep it easy.

[Anonymous No.27598604]

>>27598289
great, thanks anon

[Anonymous No.27598762]

bump, thanks everyone who replied so far.

[Anonymous No.27599033]

>>27594109
0x0F13bcE1dBa3c09DFE06De0098bB5Fd665fE9616

Q1: Yes. I'm done being raped by gas fees
Q2: also yes
Q3: yes
Q4: I don't think I'd make the effort of doing it without metamask. It's too convenient.

[Anonymous No.27599204]

0xc58afc790c7a40e14a94cd7e2e1a1e5278452ccb

Q1 - Gas fees are annoying, although xDai is good

Q2 - I would offer a suggestion for you to look at building on elrond (eGLD) not really in the limelight developer wise

Q3 - Not really a fan of staking, although I really do see the positives, I'm too eager ahaha

Q4 - I Wouldn't mind trust wallet to be used as well

thanks anon, good cunt

[Anonymous No.27599492]

>>27596712
I would. I trust Metamask, so that would facilitate the decision for me a lot (as someone who has very little knowledge about xDAI).

[Anonymous No.27599538]

>>27599033
>trust wallet
checked, and it's a good idea as well
>>27599204
thanks anon

[Anonymous No.27599612]

>>27599204
whoops wrong address,

this one

0xac038d27Ca69cf8940b521805523447fF89A08a4

[Anonymous No.27599617]

0xcC68e45cd4769400455eC3219a95CAe39ADae900


>Q1: Building only on Ethereum is super costly for users right now. Would you use the dapp if built on xDai chain? It requires users to convert ERC20 DAI to xDai through the bridge. Do you think it will hurt adoption? ETH gas fees are so high, I'm affraid it requires either a L2 or another scalable L1.

Yes, if its better.

>Q2: would you use the product if it was built on Cardano, Polkadot or other L1?

Anything that is better than Eth.

>Q3: would you enjoy a dividend-based staking mechanism, where you receive, at the end of each week, some dividend in DAI, from value generated on the platform, additionally with token staking rewards?

Hell yeahhhhh

[Anonymous No.27599896]

I know you already hit 30 addresses, but in case you decide to do more. Sounds like an interesting concept and I'd love to give it a shot.

0x110A9fb158C2072bB4F9Be7016Bf2231214765C3

[Anonymous No.27600101]

>>27599896
I will consider all the addresses here until the thread is archived. You all have been very helpful

[Anonymous No.27600451]

last bump, then. Thanks everyone, make sure to watch for future thread and the coming airdrop to the addresses you provided.

[Anonymous No.27600847]

>>27594109
Thanks my man. Definitely looking into this coin.

[Anonymous No.27600934]

Eth 0x76b257607380a75621a1405c551d7c1ef32777d5

>Q1: Building only on Ethereum is super costly for users right now. Would you use the dapp if built on xDai chain? It requires users to convert ERC20 DAI to xDai through the bridge. Do you think it will hurt adoption? ETH gas fees are so high, I'm affraid it requires either a L2 or another scalable L1.
Yeah I'm sure it will hurt adoption, though can't disagree with the gas fee argument. Depends on what you're aiming here. Will you be able to list it somewhere accessable? If yes then fuck eth.
>Q2: would you use the product if it was built on Cardano, Polkadot or other L1?
Was gonna ask if you looked into cardano under the first answer. As long as it's functioning and is accessable.
>Q3: would you enjoy a dividend-based staking mechanism, where you receive, at the end of each week, some dividend in DAI, from value generated on the platform, additionally with token staking rewards?
Free moneyz yes
>Q4: we think offering a metamask-based access is critical to reach a broader audience. Do you agree? Would you use something else if the dapp requires it?
Depends whaf is that something else and what are the fees desu. Why not list it on multiple places? I guess it can be costly but the pay off will be good. Although idk I'm a brainlet

[Anonymous No.27600940]

>>27594109
Thanks man.

0xEaa5db8c4Ada0EE1D6b569Bcf4128c448ba285C1

[Anonymous No.27601068]

>>27597766
this

[Anonymous No.27601226]

>>27600940
if you can answer some questions at least, that would be good, thanks a lot.
>>27600934
>>27601068
thanks for this, that was my main nono point with xDai.

Really think that being on Uniswap asap would be a big + for adoption/token price

[Anonymous No.27601471]

>>27594109
I'd use it on xDAI.
Probably not on Polka, cause I don't know how polka works, but otherwise ye.
Divvies in DAI would be nice, and staking rewards would be based.
Metamask based access would be hugely beneficial, but how exactly are you supposed to tie in xDAI to metamask?

0xce1aB7E26D2a8Ff4FB5Efc9E282Cf616F215FF17

[Anonymous No.27601518]

>>27600940
>>27601226
Sure, although Im a newfag and don't want to fuck up your data since I don't understand it very well.
Q1) Not sure - still learning. I will do anything to avoid gas fees though since Im investing a small amount
Q2) Not sure
Q3) hmmm maybe. dividends are taxable so maybe stock payout instead.
Q4) metamask would be smart - accessibility = good

[Anonymous No.27601585]

>>27594109
0x1e1f6cd3b5436a2c5cdfa4e62b80ab3dcbe2e238

thank you sirs

Q1
it will hurt short term adoption, but long term it will be the better option

Q2
prefer ada/dot over eth

Q3
more rewards are always going to be welcome

Q4
metamask/eth foundation has the most user base

[Anonymous No.27601604]

0xB59eB3A7A24f3Bc25C3A6e48E497B532d4C76af4


Q1: the way I see it people get hurt more from losing a certain amount then they get happy from recieving, they will always prefer lower fees, doesnt matter how
Q2: I hold abit of cardano and I believe in the project so any use for it is always welcome
Q3: staking is mainly my income at this point, low risk raise to the top is the way to go and I mostly support projects with dividents of some sort
Q4: metamask is comfort king, anything not cold stored passes there because its easy to use as a pitstop for other apps

Hope im not too late ;-;

[Anonymous No.27601752]

>>27601226
yeah indeed.

[Anonymous No.27601840]

>>27601226
Not sure how the lsiting process works. Do you need to pay them to be listed or something? Aim for binance. No one wants to pay $30 fee for a small transaction.
Make sure to present your shitcoin well. First thing I'm looking at when checking out shitcoins is their website, how well it is made, graphic eye candy etc. I know it's retarded but really gives the coin some solidity compared to other altcoins.

[Anonymous No.27602078]

>>27594109
0x8fE95C5e35D6D80002351d0E9854a7C29E3dc3dE

1. Yes, i want to avoid the gas fees they have been killing me
2. Yes, I don't know much about these but don't seem like blockers
3. Yes this sound good, I always love staking and dividends are truly appealing
4. I think it's a huge plus but not critical if you use other similar services

:)

[Anonymous No.27602079]

>>27594109
Q1: Building only on Ethereum is super costly for users right now. Would you use the dapp if built on xDai chain? It requires users to convert ERC20 DAI to xDai through the bridge. Do you think it will hurt adoption? ETH gas fees are so high, I'm affraid it requires either a L2 or another scalable

Yes I would still use it. You need to find an easy onramp for noobs though.

Q2: would you use the product if it was built on Cardano, Polkadot or other L1?

Yes see above

Q3: would you enjoy a dividend-based staking mechanism, where you receive, at the end of each week, some dividend in DAI, from value generated on the platform, additionally with token staking rewards?

Yes I think that's a great idea and would encourage more staking

Q4: we think offering a metamask-based access is critical to reach a broader audience. Do you agree? Would you use something else if the dapp requires it?

I kinda agree, but like I said earlier if you can find a comparably simple onramp other chains would be fine (and preferred due to the way lower fees)

Thanks op good luck with the project!

0x2Ec32426Fa5fc92469F3d741103ED92035645ce3

[Anonymous No.27602080]

>>27601226

Hey, I already posted a little earlier in the thread; I just thought it might be helpful to give a little more in depth answer to your question. It's honestly hard to tell larps from actual posts these days.

1. As somebody who has been entirely priced out of the alt market because of gas fees over the past few weeks, I'm desperetly waiting for more projects to utilize xDai, it's really frustrating to see high APY farms popping up all over the place, but it's not even worth it then to stake a small stack.

2. Absolutely.

3. Yes, things like this provide liquidity while making up for slight dips here and there and discourage swing trading.

4. Never had an issue with metamask, but I'm more than open to trying something more specific.

[Anonymous No.27602303]

>>27601604
>the way I see it people get hurt more from losing a certain amount then they get happy from recieving, they will always prefer lower fees, doesnt matter how
Unironically this. Doesn't matter what shitstorebumfuck eschange you list it on (to anons that is) as long as there are low fees and easy navigation.
The only way to grab the normie audience is through listing on big exchanges. Or I guess having some ex ETH developer in their team.

[Anonymous No.27602777]

>>27601471
thanks.
> how exactly are you supposed to tie in xDAI to metamask?
https://www.xdaichain.com/for-users/wallets/metamask/metamask-setup
it's a quite simple process
>>27601518
>>27601585

>>27602078
>>27601604
thanks

>>27601840
sure, but the first weeks will be uniswap only, like many projects. We'll do what we can to be listed there.
>>27602079
thanks
>>27602080
interesting opinion.

we reached 50 replies, thanks everyone.

[Anonymous No.27603086]

This looks actually nice.

[Anonymous No.27603212]

>>27602777
>we reached 50 replies, thanks everyone.
REEEE I WANT MY FREE TENDIES

[Anonymous No.27603292]

Q1: I don't have a strong opinion on this one, but gas fees suck hard with ETH2.0 a loooooong way off. Happy if xDai - your project could be the excuse I need to give it a try

Q2: probably yes, same as for Q1. Hodling a small bag of ADA for 4 years

Q3: Yes sounds great, as other anons said will depend on the wider tokenomics

Q4: Metamask best choice for adoption

0x4dCbdD2a67675Bb9BD130217bE1479000843e33f

If you can get an exchange listing will increase normie adoption / reduce cross chain swap hassle

gl OP!

[Anonymous No.27603333]

>>27603212
okay, if you can tell me your honest opinion on using a L2 on metamask vs using Cardano & Yoroi extension? (provide address, I'll add you to the list)

[Anonymous No.27603627]

>>27594109
> Q1: Building only on Ethereum is super costly for users right now. Would you use the dapp if built on xDai chain? It requires users to convert ERC20 DAI to xDai through the bridge. Do you think it will hurt adoption? ETH gas fees are so high, I'm affraid it requires either a L2 or another scalable L1.
I agree, gas fees are too high, even in the morning, the gas fee is ridiculous. I wouldn't mind converting though, if it's faster, then why not.

Q2: would you use the product if it was built on Cardano, Polkadot or other L1?
I'm optimistic about Cardano. Polkadot, not so.

Q3: would you enjoy a dividend-based staking mechanism, where you receive, at the end of each week, some dividend in DAI, from value generated on the platform, additionally with token staking rewards?
That would be a great sales pitch and I would want to have some.

Q4: we think offering a metamask-based access is critical to reach a broader audience. Do you agree? Would you use something else if the dapp requires it?
I've been using metamask this whole time, it's way easier.

My metamask eth address: 0x6F0618bDa287325788C978277E0eDd8B7A191FA0

Thanks!

[Anonymous No.27603769]

>>27594109
Do you know when youre going to launch it anon? Im quite interested

[Anonymous No.27603787]

>>27594109
0xa045df23ae038e8a72dfa1a071864b618b4274d0

Q1 : yes I would use it
Q2 : Yes as I am interested in those aswell
Q3 : Yes, I do like this system
Q4 : Would stuck to Metamask

[Anonymous No.27603812]

>>27594109
1. Yes, xdai-chain is understandable.
2. Yes
3. Yes
4. Yes

0x78D17c9B0E0A433FaAf4632a638edF8A7E657557

[Anonymous No.27603909]

>>27594109
1. It will hurt adoption if the bridge isn't seamless
2. Possibly
3. Yes definitely
4. Agreed. Wallet connect is ok too.
0xee1f2574E4f36418138F9258d965a5aB7b7530A1

[Anonymous No.27604100]

>>27594109
0xe179185bd44a41a73EA476de5CDe952fDdEDD91D

[Anonymous No.27604550]

>>27603333
>Q2: would you use the product if it was built on Cardano, Polkadot or other L1?
I honestly don't know much about crypto and don't really understand what this question means lol.
I appreciate the offer tho

[Anonymous No.27604707]

>>27594109
0x8a6442Db506486D33a2E5347876C1371C3C9dCd9

[Anonymous No.27604717]

>>27602777
Alright then, you've got me hooked, what's the token ticker?

[Anonymous No.27604758]

post er es een reply met "
0xcd320d66e18FD05E694A52f672e19C53d41C252E

q1: Probably would consider using it but yes, it will hurt adoption.
q2: Polkadot seems promising, maybe..?
q3: Definitely.
q4: Definitely needed in the beginning, unless others start taking off.

[Anonymous No.27604878]

>>27601518
yeah the gas fees suck especially for newbs/students/whatever who can't put a lot of money in, especially in a new coin. If you put in 200 EUR, almost 10-20% gets eaten by gas, that's ridiculous

[Anonymous No.27604898]

>>27604550
Alright, since you're a newfag, I'll help you out a little.
Layer one tokens are tokens that other tokens can be created upon. They're like Ethereum, Polka, and Cardano. ERC20 tokens are Layer 2, where they float upon their token backing and function semi-dependently upon their layer one's.

[Anonymous No.27604955]

>>27603769
in the coming weeks! Testnet is coming soon, ICO will follow. I'll make threads later and reference this thread for all of you, to be able to follow up.
>>27603787
Good to know.
>>27603909
Thanks

[Anonymous No.27605114]

>>27604717
token isn't out yet. Aidrop will happen when the token is live.

[Anonymous No.27605308]

>>27594109
0x8a6442Db506486D33a2E5347876C1371C3C9dCd9

A1: Anything to take market share away from the bloated ETH network is a good thing. I don't think it will hurt adoption. we can make guides on what to do to get your coin anons will be able to figure it out.

A2: These platforms have nowhere to go but up. A quality product on one of the alternative chains will be very attractive

A3 : Sounds like a good incentive to drive adoption.

A4: no we can figure it out. metamask is ok but everyone associates it with the ridiculous gas fees. any alternative would be welcome at this point.

[Anonymous No.27605471]

>>27604898
So your question is if I'd rather use something build on the ETH network, i.e. through MetaMask or on Polka/Cardano?

[Anonymous No.27605721]

>>27594109

Cardano, you could even apply for a grant and get biz to support you.

[Anonymous No.27605743]

>>27605471
yes, it's really about: would you be okay having to use new tools/coins/wallet extension or you would really prefer metamask, to keep habits?

[Anonymous No.27606299]

>>27605743
I guess I can answer that: I would definitely prefer to use familiar tools, like metamask, over learning a bunch of new technologies. My guess is this goes for most people like me who are a bit into crypto but don't have a full understanding of how all the ecosystems work.

0x9BbC8Fb791c9DABF789194a099EFF746929528B9

[Anonymous No.27606624]

Q1 : I would not mind, ETH gas fees are so fucked rn anyway, if you have multiple interaction with the smart contract your DAP will be unusable IMO. Not sure we can count on ETH fundation to deliver either.

Q2 : Yes no objection to either ADA or DOT (personal preference for ADA tho). I think you can squeeze a better deal from them, they are desperately looking for killer-dapp

Q3 : Free money? I'm not big into staking but sure why not.

Q4 : Looks like metamask is the only game in town for the moment, would not mind using something else either, but not sure you can expect your user keeping up with 10 different wallets plugins

Wallet : 0x4c58eB194430624b4647afaA74aD9585A4F0f50D