/biz/ - Give me a better 1000x

[Anonymous No.14635661]

Give us what you have and why you believe your crypto investment is better than Constellation (DAG). This is what you are up against (DAG);

Pros;
>Ultra-low market cap, 5 million USD
>Will make IOTA, NANO, and partly ETH obsolete with better technology
>DAG founders recently burned ALL their tokens, 7.2% of total supply
>Deflationary token model
>Horizontally scaleable. Faster and more capacity with every node. No theoretical limit to TPS.
>DAG is a platform
>MainNet in Q3
>Staking
>Dynamic Partitioning
>DAG has smart contracts
>Direct on-chain data processing. No other blockchain infrastructure is able to do that
>Light-nodes on phone
>CEO actually ran a business with 45 million in annual revenue
>Advisor: Rehito (Ray) Hatoyama former Managing Director of Hello Kitty (Sanrio)
>Partnership negotiations with NASA, General Motors and Denso
>US, San Francisco based

Just as Nano, DAG is:
>Free
>Instant
>Green
However, they are superior to Nano in virtually every way.
>Part of a large ecosystem, with real use cases that will provide security for the network and world-wide market. Same as IOTA, but better
>This large ecosystem and not solely a currency will provide protection from Central Bank regulators, like ETH & IOTA, but unlike Nano.
>All zero-fee systems are open to spam attacks. Constellation has a much more advanced and elegant solution than Nano with their reputation system.
>Nano has an insane business model where Nano node operators have to do it for free. This will either lead to a crash, where no one bothers to run nodes for fun and take all the costs, or an insane centralization where Amazon controls nearly everything. Constellation has a very elegant solution where micropayments are free for everyone, while large consumers of bandwidth will have to either pay for it in DAG tokens, or run their own nodes

[Anonymous No.14635716]

>>14635661
Plus
>Whitelisted for all major exchanges. Didn’t have ICO. No US pre-sale investors. On Kucoin.
>Good time to buy, coins on sale: http://archive.is/nIcDE
>Partnered with the University of Illinois
>CTO Wyatt writes in academic papers

Cons:
>Constant FUD from psychotic pre-sale investor that lost money when the market crashed in 2018. Spamming biz with debunked accusations, lies and fabrications (e.g. exit scamming, doing cocaine, lost all funds through daytrading, vaporware, restaurant, etc, etc. Claims to be part of secret U.N. instigation team - operating under the command of Federal Reserve). Using VPN. Bumps every thread :)

[Anonymous No.14635754]

Aaand, getting the ticker DAG was brilliant. Every normie searching for dag+crypto will land on Constellation (DAG). Weird that other competitors did not see this long time before Constellation entered the market.

[Anonymous No.14635929]

Core dev is a genius.

[Anonymous No.14635945]

Finally a CEO in crypto space that actually understands business, pic.

[Anonymous No.14636105]

I have a buy order waiting to be filled I want it to dump just a little more

[Anonymous No.14636191]

What's the TPS of this shitcoin?

[Anonymous No.14636207]

>>14636191
Horizontally scaleable. Faster and more capacity with every node. No theoretical limit to TPS.

[Anonymous No.14636210]

>>14635945
Personally I can't wait for the SEC to throw every last one of you telegram pajeets in jail with an international jurisdiction.

[Anonymous No.14636223]

>>14636210
Are you the idiot rambling on about SEC last summer? How you had inside information and it was just a matter of days before they would all be arrested due to your brilliant private investigation, but you could not document anything because of the ongoing investigation and even the American president told you in a private conversation to reveal too much? Pic related.

[Anonymous No.14636257]

>>14636210
Are you the idiot rambling on about SEC last summer? How you had inside information and it was just a matter of days before they would all be arrested due to your brilliant private investigation, but you could not document anything or give us any details, because of the ongoing investigation and even the American president told you in a private conversation not to reveal too much because of national interests of the USA? Pic related. In short, you were not an idiot and amateur investor losing all your money when the market crashed in 2018, but you were the "victim" of a "clever scam" that only you uncovered thanks to your "brilliant" private investigation. Take your meds dude. I hope you get well, fren.

[Anonymous No.14636315]

>>14636191
Unlike other crypto in the market, that is blind to different nodes, DAG has implemented a brilliant Proof of Reputable Observation (PRO) system, where reputable nodes are recognized, meaning DAG will always have higher TPS than IOTA, NANO, FTM etc unless they also implement that solution.

More here:
https://constellationlabs.io/how-constellation-is-different-than-blockchain/

[Anonymous No.14636425]

>>14636210
And for the record, I am not posting on telegram, only rarely and briefly get in there to get an update on what is going on, but they look like a happy and interesting gang.

Anyone new to Constellation (DAG) should join them:
constellationcommunity

constellationtrader

[Anonymous No.14636456]

Bought 1m last year still holding might buy another one - is there any shit comming up?

[Anonymous No.14636529]

>>14636456
Mainnet Q3. Several partnership presentations and negotiations. Upcoming listings on exchanges, etc.

[Anonymous No.14636665]

>>14636456
You might like this:
Constellation Network Transportation Application Demo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mQhQuE5JnUo

Lots of interesting new vids on their channel.

[Anonymous No.14636757]

>>14635929
>>14635945
>>14635716
>>14635661
PASTA YIKES

[Anonymous No.14636866]

>>14636757
>PASTA YIKES
You must really hate relevant business information when making investment decisions. You are throwing darts as your favorite decision model for heavy investments, right?

[Anonymous No.14636887]

I was ready to buy in but why do they have shit like "proof of meme" in their white paper? Enterprises won't take this seriously.

[Anonymous No.14636909]

>>14636866
stop trying to sound smart you aren't. i sold 70% of my LINK bag at the top and became millionaire. still in disbelief but i am obviously smart, it worked. imagine i had bought DAG instead a year ago, JUST.

[Anonymous No.14636914]

>>14635661
Partnership negotiations? They're just begging NASA to look at them. Anyone could do that and claim they're in negotiations with NASA.

Look at the team.. Three guys.. One is a nigger, and the CEO hasn't really got an impressive CV in regards to tech. He's worked for a fucking meat company, kek.

It looks like a scam.

[Anonymous No.14636934]

LIT, VIDT and QNT. DYOR.

[Anonymous No.14636940]

>>14636909
You sound like a true idiot. I am not advocating you buying DAG one year ago. I am saying that NOW Constellation is the best buy. Best 1000x candidate there is. Your comment makes zero logical sense.

[Anonymous No.14636957]

>>14636914
>They're just begging NASA to look at them
False
>Look at the team.. Three guys
False
>CEO hasn't really got an impressive CV
False
>It looks like a scam.
Insane.

[Anonymous No.14636965]

>>14636940
>>14636887

Yeah, what's the proof-of-meme all about? Sounds pretty silly.

[Anonymous No.14636970]

>>14636934
Why?

[Anonymous No.14636982]

>>14636957
Then fucking prove me wrong.

Only three team members shown on the website.

In the image you posted here, it clearly says "proposal for NASA" >>>14636529

What's impressive about the CEO's CV?

And if you can't fucking debunk these points, then why wouldn't it be a scam - or at the very least a shitty fucking investment?

I'm openminded. Convince me. I'm looking for that 1000x coin, but I don't want to invest in shit.

[Anonymous No.14636996]

>>14636887
>>14636965
They changed the name long time ago, Raphael. Have you not come one step further after you crashed and burned with your insane investments and blamed everything on Constellation. Have you ditched your meds again?

They changed the terminology to "Proof of Reputable Observation (PRO)" long time ago. Inform yourself. Only idiots like you has have names as deal-breakers when making investments. "Apple" sounds totally stupid for you, right? Who will invest in them? Why are all DAG fudders such idiots?

[Anonymous No.14637020]

>>14636996
Listen up.. You make a shill thread, so you do the fucking shilling. Besides that, today is the first time I hear about this project. Stop being a schizo.

Debunk my points. Let's start with the team.. Where are the other team members then? Weren't there more than three?

[Anonymous No.14637080]

>>14636982
>Only three team members shown on the website.
Try Github and LinkedIn as well, "investor". That you make statement as facts when you are confusing founders with total team only further proves what kind of true moron you really are. Is your name Raphael?
>In the image you posted here, it clearly says "proposal for NASA
They have business negotiations with them. Are in several forums together, pic. You, the the amateur investor idiot, claimed it was just something they mailed to Nasa.
>What's impressive about the CEO's CV?
Pic >>14635945
>And if you can't fucking debunk these points, then why wouldn't it be a scam
You post unfounded garbage and just know, using your psychic powers and talking to the dead, that I am not able to refute your low IQ rambling, so thus you "know" and state as a "fact" that DAG is a scam. Do you have any idea how stupid you sound?

[Anonymous No.14637098]

>>14637020
>Besides that, today is the first time I hear about this project.
Sure Raphael. Whatever you say Raphael. Pic related. Take your meds dude.

[Anonymous No.14637127]

>>14637020
>Listen up.. You make a shill thread, so you do the fucking shilling
I don't like you. I don't want to help you to get rich, so fuck off. Spam your low IQ nonsense somewhere else and please do a minimum of research before you reach your childish "conclusions". You are a total waste of time. Sorry.

[Anonymous No.14637130]

>>14637080
You really suck at shilling.

You still haven't provided any evidence. The CEO's own words don't mean shit. Anyone could write a fucking lie in telegram ffs.

"I'm the former head of NASA. Buy my Marscoin (FUCCD). We are 4000 team members, although none of them can be found on our page."

[Anonymous No.14637140]

>>14637130
See >>14637127

[Anonymous No.14637166]

>>14637140
Again, you suck at shilling.

>can't prove anything
>claims not to like people as an excuse for not having to prove anything

Fucking retard. You harm this coin more than anything else with that attitude.

[Anonymous No.14637194]

>>14637166
>Fucking retard. You harm this coin more than anything else with that attitude.
Happy to see that nasty morons and pathological liars like you are unwilling to invest in DAG. Great. Do some research next time before you make statements. Don't waste my time.

[Anonymous No.14637216]

>>14637194
I think you're the Rapahel you mentioned earlier. You're a bitter, bitter cunt with heavy ass fucking bags trying to get some morons to buy your shitcoin, kek.

Stop projecting, Raphael. Do a market sell and get over it. Sometimes you just need to take a loss. We've all made mistakes and invested in shitcoins. Better get out before it's too late.

[Anonymous No.14637260]

>>14637166
>>14637216
Between, why are you so rabid, emotional and plain hysterical. You are clearly not just some random, neutral investor looking into a project. Give us your real background and motivation. Don't just run away. Be honest for once. Stop being a lying, angry and nasty psycho spamming lies and garbage on biz.

[Anonymous No.14637293]

>>14637216
See >>14636257
I hope the President of the USA is still calling you and calming you down, listening to the latest updates of your "investigation". Care to share with us what you have found?

[Anonymous No.14637307]

>>14637260
I'm literally just a Danish anon trying to find a good many-x coin. Not at all emotional. If anything, I'm having a laugh over your attitude.

You don't fucking make a shill thread if you're not ready to shill the fuck out of it and answer all questions. What's the point in making a shill thread just to tell people to dyor and get fucked?

You brought this upon yourself, anon. So it's up to you to shill it.

Let's start with the team members.. Who are the others? I still only see three..

[Anonymous No.14637329]

>>14637307
Give me your background in Danish with slang, no Google translate. Go on.

[Anonymous No.14637347]

>>14637329
Hvad fanden vil du have, at jeg skal sige, din bums? Jeg har sgu da ikke tænkt mig at sidde her og fortælle dig om hele mit liv. Tag dig sammen.

[Anonymous No.14637371]

>>14637347
I will send it to a Scandinavian anon. Stand by.

[Anonymous No.14637400]

>>14637347
One more time, use slang and some specific Danish politics. What party do you support and why, especially in context of Muslim immigration.

[Anonymous No.14637450]

>>14637400
I voted Stram Kurs. V for Sejr!

[Anonymous No.14637499]

>>14637450
OK, you are good to go. What do you want to know, Dane?

[Anonymous No.14637542]

>>14637499
I want to know who the devs are. They should have listed them on their website.

And where's the proof of the CEO's former position in that big company? What's impressive about his CV?

[Anonymous No.14637661]

>>14637307
>>14637542
Here: https://www.linkedin.com/search/results/people/?facetCurrentCompany=%5B%2218362287%22%5D

They have at least 2 Polish devs in addition to core dev. They downsized the marketing department after Crypto crash and crypto winter.

They are hiring, but the demand for people with blockchain experience and expertise is fierce:
https://angel.co/company/constellation-labs-1/jobs

I like CEO's combination of analytical skills, marketing and proven entrepreneurial spirit. A typical MBA person will not survive in this market;
https://www.linkedin.com/in/bjorgensen/

[Anonymous No.14637736]

>>14635661
Was legit going to invest thousands into this, went into the discord, and the team is acting like retards/unprofessionals asking the community if they think moving to telegram might help them. Lost all respect and hope of them being different/better. Literally just a pump/dump or hoping their project is any different.

[Anonymous No.14637784]

>>14637736
Both discord and telegram was spammed for months. See >>14636257
Constellation went into stealth mode for months after they fired their old CEO and was just building. Now they are back and giving good news and updates all the time. Telegram is up and running, but Discord is still pretty dead, at least last time I was there. Try Telegram instead.

[Anonymous No.14637856]

>>14637661
Thanks. Seen worse. But I have a problem with the huge sell walls on Hotbit, and on Kucoin they're also a lot thicker than the buy walls. Wonder if there's something someone knows that you and I don't? Why such an eager to sell, while no eager to buy?

[Anonymous No.14637985]

>>14637856
After Constellation went into stealth mode, fired CEO and lots of fud from angry pre-sale investors (investing before crypto crash), there were virtually no buyers at all. On top of that, lots of investors got problems with paying taxes as suddenly every transaction between crypto to crypto was a taxable event and they had to sell tons to pay for taxed. Some of them are bankrupt and the sell orders are still there, placed by tax collectors. The buy order book has been filling every day the last two months. In addition you have sellers like this guy: http://archive.is/nIcDE and this guy, pic.

Hotbit is wash trading with virtually no volume, so for a few bucks you can flash crash the price. Somebody is clearly doing that and trying to spook the market.

I was there when I thought there was a technical glitch somewhere at Kucoin. Only red. Only sellers. Buy orders are getting momentum now. Guess in another month it will be 50/50

[Anonymous No.14638256]

>>14637856
If you want to know more about the current market, you can go to the telegram group:
constellationtrader

I am sure they can provide you valuable and up-to-date information.

[Anonymous No.14638351]

>>14637784
Thanks for response, but this was major people in the project talking. Why would I invest when these people dont know wtf they are doing themselves?

[Anonymous No.14638506]

>>14638351
I am not even sure who is on Discord, never really was there, never made a comment. But I do know it is hard for outsiders to understand the crypto investor community: Why the rift between biz and plebbit, why Discord is liked by plebbit, and not so much on biz, what is the boomer meme and so on. Guess they were just asking around to get information.

[Anonymous No.14638593]

One of the most toxic communities I've ever seen in this space. Stay far away from this

[Anonymous No.14638626]

>>14638593
On the contrary. This is one of the most open and transparent communities open to discuss strengths and weaknesses. It is, however, one of, if not the most, fudded projects on biz, by salty pre-sale bagholders and very worried market competitors.

[Anonymous No.14638668]

>>14638626
Fuck off you lying piece of shit. You're gonna be stuck holding those bags until the end of time.

[Anonymous No.14638727]

>>14638668
>>14638593
>Fuck off you lying piece of shit.
Yep, you are truly the right person to complain about a toxic community...

What you are saying is not true. You can start with the founders themselves. When was the last time you founders burn ALL their tokens for nothing, just to show support to the community, pic?

[Anonymous No.14638791]

>>14636982
>Three
They changed their web site a while ago to be more like a professional tech company, so they don't list every employee anymore. For example, their lead engineer Ryle (the guy who works side by side with Wyatt and who oversees implementing Wyatt's ideas in Scala) isn't mentioned on the site, but he's given talks with Wyatt at conferences.

The CEO Ben used to run an adtech company that became pretty successful.

[Anonymous No.14638797]

>>14638727
When I make it I'm going apply to be a janny so I can lurk this board 24/7 like a neckbeard and ban scumbags like you

[Anonymous No.14638929]

>>14638593
It isn't really the "community" that's toxic. I've been following it for a long time. This is one of the most exciting projects technical-wise. Basically there are people who were involved who were more "cryptocurrency" rather than "technology" types who now have a grudge. I'm not sure if they are the ones FUDding but they showed up around the time of the CEO's dismissal and were angry. For example, there was a guy who claimed to be the "VP of Engineering" but who actually just set up the private sale web site on contract and never worked for the team after that. He claimed that he expected more work from the old CEO and that he was angry that he was never given more work. Another guy showed up just a few weeks ago and showed what he claimed to be messages from the old CEO a while ago about how there would be a certain number of exchange listings, and he was disappointed that this hadn't happened.

My point is, when the old CEO was ousted there were people like this who started having a grudge against the project. The price also tanked at that time because the market freaked out. Ben became CEO, righted the ship, stopped all the crypto moonboy type stuff and focused everything on the true value, the tech, Wyatt and Ryle's work. The real community is still around, following the developments and excited about what's coming next.

[Anonymous No.14639021]

>>14636529
Sounds like bagholder bingo ranjeet

[Anonymous No.14639085]

>>14639021
>bagholder bingo
only functions when the project is stagnate, the devs leaving, CEO taking a long vacation etc. Not when a project is going for full steam ahead. Mainnet on your bingo, really?

[Anonymous No.14639626]

>>14635661
>Advisor: Rehito (Ray) Hatoyama former Managing Director of Hello Kitty (Sanrio)
I believe it's this guy, together with DAG CEO

[Anonymous No.14639845]

>>14637216
oh hey mega man still not done with your psychotic bullshit? quit being a nigger and we can talk on tele you know where to find me @ dag squad

[Anonymous No.14639864]

>>14639845
might be wrong person lool but hey pm me

[Anonymous No.14640139]

The FUD did not come from salty presale investors. The FUD came from an insider who said go ask the CEO Ben Jorgensen to make a single official statement "the former CEO Brendan Playford did NOT day trade investor capital on exchanges for losses."

He said it would be impossible for him to make this statement. So like 500 different people came to their TG and demanded they make a statement. They refused which made everyone super suspicious. The token price took a 30% dive that day. They were banning their own investors from TG and anyone who asked this question. They scrubbed their TG of all remnants of this whole disaster, fired their marketing team and went silent for a year.
Now they are back, still refusing to answer the question. And yesterday the CEO said he would not make an official statement and would start banning anyone who asks.
The FUD is very real, it's the only FUD that matters it would all go away if they just made a statement. This one question destroyed their community and needs to be answered or this token dies a slow death.
The team are dishonest lying marketers of vaporware and this one question will be the end of them

[Anonymous No.14640214]

>>14640139
its weird that they blame Raphael for the coins FUD when in reality Im pretty sure the whale that dumped the coin fucked him over so he just went crazy and tells everyone the facts about DAG.

[Anonymous No.14640238]

>>14636996
>They changed the name long time ago
It still says proof of meme in the whitepaper
https://github.com/Constellation-Labs/whitepaper-business

[Anonymous No.14640378]

I don't believe any evidence was put forward to prove the CEO was day trading with investor funds. HOWEVER, the reaction by the team and their community was batshit insane and put a 99.99% chance that the CEO day trading FUD was in fact true.
No project would take a 30% one day loss and complete abandonment of their community over a single easy to answer question. They made fake statements, beat around the bush, answered in abstract ways, and told all investors if you don't like it get the fuck out.
Completely bizarre reaction. They send their insane community members into TG and biz to make strawman arguments and lots of fake rumors about drug use and other bullshit to make it look like it's all a lark.
It's just unexplainable and bizarre the lengths they go to not to answer that one question. I would guess they have made more than 50 statements explaining why they don't have to answer that one question.
The FUD is all but confirmed. And don't let their shills side track you, it's really just one question anyone cares about because if it's true the team would be almost put of money or unable to fund themselves to profitability.

[Anonymous No.14640629]

Just pump this shit already, 2x is fine

[Anonymous No.14641044]

>>14640139
>>14640378
Bullshit comment. Here, the ex CEO himself debunking your garbage, pic.

Fact is that you couldn't care less whether or not this is true. You know that you have zero reason to believe your fantasy Mickey Mouse story about day trading and your main motivation is to damage Constellation. You also know that the team has a non-disclosure agreement with the ex CEO, so they will not comment on any of this. That's the only reason why you push that they shall comment on it, despite the ex CEO has already debunked it officially long time ago.

[Anonymous No.14641067]

>>14640139
>>14640378
Here you go, buddy. Stop being so blatantly dishonest. The guy you are accusing has categorically denied your crazy accusation based on absolutely nothing, so why on earth would you go to a third-party and demand an answer to a question you already know the answer to? Except of dishonesty and deception, of course.

[Anonymous No.14641116]

>>14640238
Constellation proposes Proof of Reputable Observation (PRO), a novel reputation-based mechanism to incentivize nodes to act honestly.

Source:
https://constellationlabs.io/how-constellation-is-different-than-blockchain/

[Anonymous No.14641159]

>>14640139
>>14640378
The FUD came from an insider
No, it came from this guy and his 50 VPN IDs:
>Constant FUD from psychotic pre-sale investor that lost money when the market crashed in 2018. Spamming biz with debunked accusations, lies and fabrications (e.g. exit scamming, doing cocaine, lost all funds through daytrading, vaporware, restaurant, etc, etc. Claims to be part of secret U.N. instigation team - operating under the command of Federal Reserve). Using VPN. Bumps every thread :)

[Anonymous No.14641247]

>>14640139
>>14640378
The FUD came from an insider
No, it came from this guy and his 50 VPN IDs:
>Constant FUD from psychotic pre-sale investor that lost money when the market crashed in 2018. Spamming biz with debunked accusations, lies and fabrications (e.g. exit scamming, doing cocaine, lost all funds through daytrading, vaporware, restaurant, etc, etc. Claims to be part of secret U.N. instigation team - operating under the command of Federal Reserve). Using VPN. Bumps every thread :)

Pic is this "insider" clearly talking to himself when his VPN malfunctioned. Worse, this insider could never document or even substantiate his rabid and crazy claims about day trading, coke abuse, police investigation, soon arrests, exit scamming etc etc.

[Anonymous No.14641367]

>>14641067
Haha what a joke. He was asked and so was the current CEO to make a statement that he in fact did not trade with investor funds. The teams response to this direct question is that the funds are safu and will comment no further. The former CEO said exactly what you posted here....that all rumors are fake but he will comment no further. It is impossible to get them to make a statement because the FUD is true. It would take 2 minutes for the CEO to make a statement that would shit down all the FUD and save their destroyed community. Ever wonder why they won't? Ever wonder why they refused to talk about Brendan's mysterious disappearance for 3 months and claimed a hush order from their attorney? In the end it was just a difference or opinion and he gave up hundreds of millions of DAG and forfeited his own company in exchange for nothing. If you believe that line of shit you deserve to be poor

[Anonymous No.14641531]

>>14641367
> It would take 2 minutes for the CEO to make a statement
Again, if they have a non-disclosure agreement they can't make any statement. Only the ex CEO can do what, which he did.

1. You have NO facts to back up your insane claim about severe losses due to day trading. You are NOT able to even substantiate your crazy claim

2. Your claim has been CATEGORICALLY denied by the main person himself, former CEO.

3. Why on earth would you then pursue and demand an answer from current CEO regarding a fake claim with zero factual backing that already has been debunked by the CEO?

The insanity and stupidity in your comment and reasoning is breathtaking. You are a very dishonest and slimy person.

I challenge you to present all your reasons for why you really believe this day-trading and losses really happened. Present them here, if you dare.

[Anonymous No.14641576]

Anyone selling OTC? Let me know your TG handle. Don't bother me if you're selling less than 10m.

[Anonymous No.14641634]

>>14641367
>and claimed a hush order from their attorney?
You clearly are not used to deal with start ups with strong personalities. They had totally different strategies. That's very important for tech start up. That will lead to a lot of bad blood and a non-disclosure agreement is normal in that situation to avoid a future shit-storm. With a market cap around 1M, everyone could market buy without any problem. I guess they have some agreements with ex CEO that when this is going to be a success, he will be able to share that, if he does not make any future trouble for them. You clearly have no understanding how these things work and is only interested in spreading smear and your own crazy conspiracy theories. You whine a lot about answer, let's see how you will answer when asked what kind of documented facts you have to back up your claims. My guess is NOTHING. Prove me wrong.

[Anonymous No.14641662]

Send TG handle to this e-mail: [e-mail]. I want to buy 5 BTCs worth of tokens.

[Anonymous No.14641683]

>>14641531
Your entire post is a lie. The FUD and crushing of the token (never recovered) has a specific date. I will look it up and post it later.
The former CEO didn't categorically deny anything you lying idiot. He was asked 100 times to make a simple statement that would have legal implications. Either yes I did trade funds or no I did not. He was told specifically to answer in a way that was clear and would legally hold him accountable for his statement. He refused to do so and instead just said rumors about him were untrue which can be interrupted many ways especially from a legal defensive standpoint.

You can sit in here and lie all you want but until the team makes a full statement that Brendan Playford did NOT trade investor funds on exchanges for a loss then this project will fucking die.
Also fuck you for lying to everyone here you are a price of trash and will never unload your giant bags of dogshit

[Anonymous No.14641759]

>>14641576
>>14641662
This is so incredibly fake it's not even funny. Every day thread be like "oh huge FUD still unanswered and some shill lying to me, how can I buy $50k immediately"

>Trade book shows zero fucking volume except wash trading for a year with the exception of massive dumps by all main investors.

You have to be the most dishonest shills in crypto. Fuck you and fuck your toxic community of psychotic moonbois

[Anonymous No.14641872]

>>14641683
>>14641759
I asked you to document your claims. And you have nothing. I asked you to substantiate your claims and you have nothing.

I gave you screenshots where Brendan Playford CATEGORICALLY denies you smear and slander: "ANY OF THE FUD AND ALL[!] THE RUMOURS YOU READ ARE NOT TRUE. That's all I will comment on that matter".

Yet you, they lying idiot that can not substantiate, far less document your retarded smear, then claim:
>The former CEO didn't categorically deny anything you lying idiot.

You clearly are a low IQ pathological lying idiot. AGAIN, present your facts and document your claims, smear and vile accusations. But of course you will not, because you have NOTHING! Prove me wrong, lying psycho.

[Anonymous No.14641985]

>>14641634
I was there and saw this first hand. They were absolutely categorically asked to make a specific statement. If the rumor was untrue they could make this statement regardless and would be no issues. Like saying I have never had sex with a brontosaurus.
This issue with the CEO destroyed the community and price of token. That is a fact and the token has not recovered since. The TG was scrubbed and mass amounts of people were banned including actual presale investors.

[Anonymous No.14642020]

>>14641683
Moron. First you present facts and logic, then you make an accusation BASED on that facts and logic and demand an answer. You don't come to a guy with crazy accusations and vile smear from Disneyland and then demand random people deny them. Do you see how stupid and mentally unstable you are? Do you seriously make all those serious accusations with NO form of evidence, facts or anything at all? And you seriously believe people will waste time on your and your totally unfounded mental garbage? Have you tried that with Coca Cola or any other company?

Are you the idiot from the summer claiming to talk to the president of the USA, informing him about your amateur investigation of Constellation? That you already had contacted SEC about your investigation into day trading, but you could give us no details due to the FBI and SEC investigation, but they would all be arrested within days? That you secretly worked for a secret group that should clean up the financial markets on behalf of UN and the Federal Reserve. Are you that crazy idiot. You sure sound like him. The accusations are exactly the same and you also have NOTHING to back up your smear with. Just some Mickey Mouse "inside information" rambling. Take it to the FBI you idiot.

[Anonymous No.14642056]

>>14641985
>This issue with the CEO destroyed the community and price of token
No the crazy fudder, pic, went in overdrive. Persons in the public do not deny random rumours and smear from random psychos. So where is your evidence for your accusations? You have NOTHING, right? Tragic and moronic.

[Anonymous No.14642074]

>>14641872
Sorry man I was there, he is not wrong. They did scrub the TG of all evidence and the Brendan post you reference was the catalyst for all the dumping. He wouldn't make a real statement and neither would the team

[Anonymous No.14642310]

>>14642074
>They did scrub the TG of all evidence
You mean vile spamming and hysteria.

So what evidence do you have for your insane day-trading accusations? Present what you've got here so we can have a look at it. But the funny thing is that all you idiots (or one guy with a VPN) whining, bitching and demanding an answer from DAG, will NEVER answer any demand seeing YOUR reasoning and evidence for YOUR vile accusations. So YOU will NEVER answer yourself. Do you see how hypocritical, dishonest and slimy you are?

[Anonymous No.14642372]

>>14642056
Ok so a single 14 year old posting on an anonymous forum killed the token. LOL that alone speaks volumes about this shit coin. The FUD is real

[Anonymous No.14642419]

>>14640378
>>14641367
>>14641683
>>14641985
>>14642074
>>14642372
If you crazy accusers seriously have NOTHING to back your vile accusations and smear with, then we can lay this ball down and just ignore you. That you can't even substantiate your crazy speculations and dishonest smear is just tragic. Especially after the main person himself has categorically denied your unfounded allegations. Tragic and very dishonest.

[Anonymous No.14642423]

>>14635661
>>Nano has an insane business model where Nano node operators have to do it for free. This will either lead to a crash, where no one bothers to run nodes for fun and take all the costs, or an insane centralization where Amazon controls nearly everything. Constellation has a very elegant solution where micropayments are free for everyone, while large consumers of bandwidth will have to either pay for it in DAG tokens, or run their own nodes

Multiwallet micropayments are gonna kill this. People aren't gonna pay to run their own nodes idiot. Nobody's gonna want to run nodes or pay for bandwidth when you can scale thousands of micropayments for a single transaction for free. DAG feeless transaction system are dead on arrival without any incentives to run the network.

[Anonymous No.14642477]

>>14642423
>DAG feeless transaction system are dead on arrival without any incentives to run the network.
This^

[Anonymous No.14642486]

>>14642310
An insider posted here saying under no circumstances would the CEO or former CEO make a statement "Brendan Playford did not day trade investor funds for losses". And the insider was correct because they literally watched their token price and community implode because of this one statement they refused to make.

>Needs more evidence and proof. Very much interested to get the insider to reveal him/herself. Not interested in clearing FUD. Doesn't understand what the fucking word categorical denial means.

KYS you lying faggot the FUD is real until they make an official statement

[Anonymous No.14642646]

>>14637098
>>14637127
>>14637130
>>14637140
>>14637166
>>14637194
>>14637216
>>14637260
>>14637293
>>14637307
>>14637329
>>14637347
>>14637371
>>14637400
>>14637450
>>14637499
What in the everloving mother fuck did I just stumble on to

[Anonymous No.14642673]

>>14642486
>An insider posted here
You mean you claim that in insider was here claiming he was an insider, making a random claim with zero evidence and we have been hearing that garbage together with hysteria about arrests, police and SEC for months, often ever single day? Basically you have nothing but unfounded smear, vile accusations and you have not even stated your real motivation behind it all.

[Anonymous No.14642974]

>>14642673
Ends up it looks to be 100% true.

[Anonymous No.14643191]

>>14642673
100000 posts on biz and TG making excuses why the team refuses to directly address one single question. The team spending months explaining why they don't have to answer. Scrubbing TG and kicking anyone who asks.

> Nothing to see here folks move along. Definitely not hiding anything. Oh and CEO disappeared and forfeited hundreds of millions of DAG because he didn't like one of his subordinates so just left his own company and put a subordinate in charge. Yep makes alot of sense and seems like an honest team and great community

[Anonymous No.14643399]

>>14642974
>>14643191
The one you accuse has officially and completely denied your crazy accusations.

ALL you have to back up those accusations is a post by a fudder claiming to be an "insider" without you being able to produce anything that would indicate that he is indeed and insider. Based on that ALONE, we have had you idiots posting for months that they would be arrested any minute, exit scamming, go bankrupt next day, etc etc. Do you see how psychotic, insane and non-analytical you sound? This must be the most stupid, unfounded and rabid FUD in the history of biz. Congratz.

[Anonymous No.14643415]

has been terrorizing and stalking a cryptocurrency project for 12 months straight called Constellation Labs.

[Anonymous No.14643525]

>>14643415
Here is your troll's father lol

[Anonymous No.14643592]

>>14643415
Haha nice work doxxing the wrong person. I was in at presale and saw this whole drama unfold. Your shill group is here and lying about it all. The insider was right and it killed this token. I will pay you 2 BTC right now if you can get the team to make an official statement coming directly from Ben Jorgensen specifically making the statement the so called insider said he wouldn't make.

[Anonymous No.14643646]

>>14643415
>>14643525
This kid is a lark made up by the team to discredit the insider. The lengths they will go to avoid answering a direct question are insane. It's over this token is dead in the water

[Anonymous No.14643657]

>>14643592
Daddy get angry with you did he? Did he scare you with his big bad temper? Aw

[Anonymous No.14643666]

>>14635661
Why does every DAG thread turn into an absolute shitstorm? Can't tell if this is bullish or bearish.

[Anonymous No.14643744]

>>14643666
It's all marketing and vaporware. The FUD is real there is no doubt about that. There have been about a million posts defending why the team doesn't need to answer a direct question. The DAG team is literally in this thread right now spreading disinformation to avoid ever having to make the one statement they can never make to clear their name.

[Anonymous No.14643783]

>>14643666
Basically Constellation has its own r/buttcoin circa 2011 led by a 16 year old. History repeats. Dag trolls will be just as embarrassed as the buttcoin trolls mark my words.

[Anonymous No.14643919]

>>14643744
honest question, if their tech will be the defacto DAG and supercede top 100 coins like NANO and IOTA with superior tech and implimentation, does their shitty dodging of their now defunct CEO matter if the tech is solid?

I'm a NANO bagholder and honestly considering this shit because its all but bottomed out and seems like it could be bullish, but the infinite FUDing always keeps me from flipping my 1000 NANO into DAG because I've been burned from bad devs and Bruno through the entire NANO shitshow since 2017.

I just want straight answers about the tech and its development to know whether its worth it for some good ROIs as the Bull market ramps up going into 2020

[Anonymous No.14643968]

>>14643919
Your mistake is you think these trolls actually care or believe it themselves. They just want chaos. Thirdworldbro is holding down the fort and is beating them TFO, meanwhile they have fifteen partnerships (!!) signed and the most promising tech in the field.

I see it as such an obvious slamdunk up to $10 in the next run that the crypto gods are making it hard for us with these trolls.

They are a sign DAG is onto something huge.

[Anonymous No.14644060]

>>14643744
>>>14643666
>It's all marketing and vaporware. The FUD is real there is no doubt about that. There have been about a million posts defending why the team doesn't need to answer a direct question. The DAG team is literally in this thread right now spreading disinformation to avoid ever having to make the one statement they can never make to clear their name.

I've been following this shitstorm. People wanting to buy in are claiming the CEO was using ICO funds to trade. Paople already holding says it's not true. What is the FUD actually? See this is where I'm really confused. Companies are investing in other companies all the time - does that result in their stock crashing? This is so fucking retarded. Moonbois are fighting fudders over something that is infact extremely common and considered good business practice.

IF the FUD is he was using it to gamle on casinos and pay off strippers, then he should immediately be replaced. And... He was. Several months ago. The team is still going strong and the core protocol was just completed.

Tell me again - what is this shitstorm about other than a shill campaign?

[Anonymous No.14644220]

>>14643968
Ok so I get that you are throwing a bunch of positive taglines and stuff at me dude, but here is the key thing to me, is it Quantum ready?
IOTA and NANO's whole shtick is being futureproofed like that.
Also can you address these Anon's concern about multiwallet micropayments and the necessity of nodes?:
>>14642423
>>14642477

As it stands right now with NANO, "fast, feeless, and scalable" is kneecapped by the possibility of flooding and the assumption/burden of running nodes getting in the way of its functionality.

[Mr ex admin No.14644473]

>>14643657
what is your deal? i made a truce post and you still assume everyone that has an opinion on biz that opposes yours is me...

[Anonymous No.14644590]

>>14644220

Good points to bring up with the team. Thanks for pointing this out anon

[Anonymous No.14644642]

>>14644060

retarded anons want answer to question that is unfounded and has no base in the first place because there is no sauce or evidence. it is a non discussion and just there to cause FUD.

[Anonymous No.14644669]

>>14643415

rekt, kek

[Anonymous No.14644843]

>>14644060
No it was an insider tip that he was reading BTC and crypto not "investing in other companies". This happened during crypto winter and it was said he lost alot of the investor funds.
Why must you try to whitewash this like it didn't happen. Nobody fuds this project to accumulate for a full year.
Insider posted a tip and appeared to have intimate knowledge of the team. Once confronted the team freaked out and shut down all questions around this banning and scrubbing all questions related.
How do you find this normal? What company loses 30% of it's MC on a rumor and doesn't dispell it even at the request of their own investors?

>Protip: they are guilty as fuck nobody would allow that to happen. It destroyed their community and wrecked their token price

[Anonymous No.14644968]

For those of you wondering if the FUD impacted the price, take a look at the chart. The insider tip on the CEO day trading for losses came out Sept 2nd 2018. The price got smashed. Go look at their TG that entire week. It's scrubbed. Facts suck don't they you lying fucking cunts.
The token price never recovered, the community deteriorated and team refused under any circumstances to explain what happened or make an official statement refuting the categorical accusation that in fact Brendan Playford did NOT day trade investor funds for losses.

The DAG shills are here, DAG team members are here. And they are fucking lying their arses off. They will never answer this FUD, it wreck their price and their community and they still won't answer. The insider was dead on and everyone in the community knew it.
Sure they don't have to answer the FUD, but it killed their whole project.

[Anonymous No.14645030]

>>14644968
OHHHH SHIT it's fucking true. Haha fuck DAG you lying pieces of shit deserve to be poor. FUD is fucking confirmed. End of thread you bunch of lying scum

[Anonymous No.14645139]

>>14645030
Yes its as real as it gets. The investors and other bagholders kept pushing in their TG and Biz for the following 3 months while the token price dropped about 90%. Eventually the team just said fuck it, fired their marketing team and went radio silent until a few months ago. Now they are back shilling this same vaporware piece of shit and probably have very little money in the bank. And they pretend none of this happened and demand proof....but scrubbed their TG clean so all that drama disappears and hope people forgot.

>we didnt forget you fucking scumdags

[Anonymous No.14645153]

>>14644968
>For those of you wondering if the FUD impacted the price, take a look at the chart. The insider tip on the CEO day trading for losses came out Sept 2nd 2018. The price got smashed. Go look at their TG that entire week. It's scrubbed. Facts suck don't they you lying fucking cunts.
>The token price never recovered, the community deteriorated and team refused under any circumstances to explain what happened or make an official statement refuting the categorical accusation that in fact Brendan Playford did NOT day trade investor funds for losses.
>
>The DAG shills are here, DAG team members are here. And they are fucking lying their arses off. They will never answer this FUD, it wreck their price and their community and they still won't answer. The insider was dead on and everyone in the community knew it.
>Sure they don't have to answer the FUD, but it killed their whole project.

Since they fired him, are still thriving and confirmed that funds are safu. Also considering they're the ONLY blockchain technology that has a working solution to big data scalability problems. It cannot be that crazy of a gamble to buy a suicide bag?

Or is there more FUD? Are they not actually doing a PoC for General Motors or something? Have NASA not sent them a Request For Proposal?

Why arent these reputable companies giving a shit about this FUD?! Crazy world. I'm buying fuck it

[Anonymous No.14645208]

>>14645139
>>14645030
>>14644968
>>14644843

/thread

[Anonymous No.14645221]

>Constellation thread
>verbose abuse being thrown all around for many hundreds of posts
Not touching this piss-show even if you paid me for it.

[Anonymous No.14645257]

>>14645153
>it never happened you are a liar
>ok it happened but it doesnt matter
>ok it matters but its not that big of a deal

KYS you lying faggots

If he lost a bunch of money it brings into question the financial stability of the company.

It was said by the insider the current CEO Ben Jorgensen, CCO Altif Brown and CTO Wyatt were all fully aware of his trading and even encouraged it. This shows they are incompetent greedy cunts and willing to lie to avoid being held responsible.
It matters, everything matters. Continuing to lie about it makes it much worse.
Side note the NASA proposal and GM pilot are completely overhyped bullshit by cheerleaders in their TG. This is not anywhere near fruition you can go ask the team yourself.

[Anonymous No.14645305]

>>14645221
You dont need to do anything other than look at Sept 2nd 2018 on the price chart and then look at their TG. Scrubbed and deleted, bans galore.
The FUD is real and all those who were there to witness know it which is why the token crashed to almost zero and the team ran and hid for 9 months hoping we would all forget.

[Anonymous No.14645376]

>>14645257
>>>14645153 (You)
>>it never happened you are a liar
>>ok it happened but it doesnt matter
>>ok it matters but its not that big of a deal
>
>KYS you lying faggots
>
>If he lost a bunch of money it brings into question the financial stability of the company.
>
>It was said by the insider the current CEO Ben Jorgensen, CCO Altif Brown and CTO Wyatt were all fully aware of his trading and even encouraged it. This shows they are incompetent greedy cunts and willing to lie to avoid being held responsible.
>It matters, everything matters. Continuing to lie about it makes it much worse.
>Side note the NASA proposal and GM pilot are completely overhyped bullshit by cheerleaders in their TG. This is not anywhere near fruition you can go ask the team yourself.

I'm very well aware of the buyin-stages of a product a company goes through. I don't have to ask the team. If you as a startup gets an RFP from NASA - then you're in really fucking good shape.

If you're doing a PoC for GM with confidence in solving the biggest technical hurdle in the global car industry today and being able to conceptionally prove it (which they did) as the ONLY working solution. This are the T-minus count down begins.

[Anonymous No.14645377]

>>14642423
Sorry, I don't understand your comment at all. Are you saying Nano is not running nodes or will not run nodes in the future?
> DAG feeless transaction system are dead on arrival without any incentives to run the network.
They have feeless transactions but WITH incentives to run nodes, unlike Nano. As I already explained here:
>Constellation has a very elegant solution where micropayments are free for everyone, while large consumers of bandwidth will have to either pay for it in DAG tokens, or run their own nodes

[Anonymous No.14645468]

>>14645376
NASA was just a submitted proposal. Anyone can submit a proposal, they were not asked to do so. That's total bullshit.

GM PoC is with hyperledger and DAG is just a paid member. This is not breaking news or validation of anything. Also the PoC was not accepted

[Anonymous No.14645484]

>>14645376
>>14645377
I notice you faggots don't want to talk about the CEO day trading anymore huh? Sucks when evidence and facts get in the way doesn't it. #scumdags

[Anonymous No.14645641]

>>14643592
>>14644843
>>14644968
>>14645257
>>14645305
>>14645484
>The insider
What insider? You have ZERO confirmation that it was a secret insider. It's an absurd claim by pic related. There was no insider, only this guy >>14643415
>What company loses 30% of it's MC on a rumor
>The price got smashed blah blah
These guys dumped their DAGs and started the rumour and FUD to get revenge. Pic.

[Anonymous No.14645705]

>>14643666
>Can't tell if this is bullish or bearish.
Bullish, lots of scared competitors plus salty pre-sale bagholders that dumped their bags with 80-90% losses, seeing new investors coming in and buying heavy bags for nearly nothing. That freaks them out.

[Anonymous No.14645717]

>>14645468
>>>14645376 (You)
>NASA was just a submitted proposal. Anyone can submit a proposal, they were not asked to do so. That's total bullshit.
>

They will not review anyones proposal. They will review the requested proposals for a solution to a clearly stated problem. The Request To Proposal gets sent out to companies with potential solutions. That's how it works.


>GM PoC is with hyperledger and DAG is just a paid member. This is not breaking news or validation of anything. Also the PoC was not accepted

Hyperledger is a key player in this space. If you've ever worked as a developer on a software product you know the necessity of standardization across new implementations. Especially with networking protocols. Hyperledger aims to bring that to the table, which is key for enterprise adoption. Constellation is a part of their quilt "product".

Provide this newly uncovered proof that the PoC was not accepted. Please

[Anonymous No.14645815]

>>14645377
Let me give an example. Let's say transactions under resulting in a total of $1.50 is considered a microtransaction. Anything above that transaction fee is, let's say 1% or if you're running your own node that costs $5/month in electricity + the cost of the hardware ($200+) + $20 internet / month to run your node.

If I have to send $500 over the network, I'm either gonna pay:
A. $500 + $5 fee
B. $500 + the cost of my node & node operation
C. Divide my $500 into 300+ micropayments in to randomly generated wallets(each under $1.50 each) using a simple script and send it all for no fee.

I'd pick C every single time so the suckers running the node are stuck with the bills at the end of the day while I mooch off their network.

[Mr ex admin No.14645823]

>>14645641
I was an admin not a fucking insider the only thing i knew was upcoming news

[Anonymous No.14645831]

>>14640139
>>14643744
>>14645139
>vaporware
lol, fudding idiots. DAG's technology is something of the very best in the market with brilliant solutions. Can you idiots walk us through your reasoning? Use facts, logic and technical expertise only. Go on fools, show us how stupid you are.

[Anonymous No.14645862]

>>14645815
Your examples are from DAG, NANO or both?

[Anonymous No.14645903]

>>14645862
Nano is free to send no matter the size. Easy enough. But the problem comes in if you are charging for specific amounts on a network where you can create unlimited wallets and disperse transactions. Either they charge for all transactions or charge nothing.

[Anonymous No.14645930]

>>14645641
STFU you lying bitch. DAG shills got crushed ITT. You can claim it was some kid that killed a $33M company to nothing but we all know thats a lark.
An insider put it out there and the team folded like a house of cards.
Game over, DAG is toast until they make a statement refuting the FUD.

[Anonymous No.14645964]

>>14635661

You didn't understand.
NO crypto investment is anything but go to a casino and put your money on black or red. It is really like that.
Bitcoin was a single and amazing and exceptional exception.
And it also led to what we see here now on /biz/
Nonstop advertising/shilling to buy what you bought... tat is neither enough to repeat bitcoin success, nor does it help

[Anonymous No.14645983]

>>14645930
>>>14645641
>STFU you lying bitch. DAG shills got crushed ITT. You can claim it was some kid that killed a $33M company to nothing but we all know thats a lark.
>An insider put it out there and the team folded like a house of cards.
>Game over, DAG is toast until they make a statement refuting the FUD.

You're broken. Let us know once you can prove your claims, pleb.

[Anonymous No.14645999]

>>14645903
>Nano is free to send no matter the size. Easy enough.
Your cost examples for Nano is way off. For Nano to be a global payment system for microtransactions you will minimum need 100 000 TPS. Do you have any idea how much that will cost in CPU, IO and bandwith? Has anyone in the Nano foundation done any cost analysis? My guess is that it will have total costs of tens of millions of USD.

For regular people doing microtransactions in DAG's system, it will all be free. Only industrial consumers of bandwith will have to pay. For a user like Amazon it will cost them much more in manpower to operate millions of wallets and it will an administrative problem from hell. Plus customers would like to have a single fix Amazon wallet to pay into. Not a new one every time they buy something. The marketing department will go insane if it is known in the market that Amazon is not willing to run a very cheap node to operate their billion dollar operations.

[Anonymous No.14646015]

>>14645964
>advertising/shilling
Informing investors and future users.

[Anonymous No.14646035]

>>14646015

Ya. Funny that

[Anonymous No.14646058]

>>14646015
>users
but crypto is not really useful

[Anonymous No.14646073]

>>14645999
>For a user like Amazon it will cost them much more in manpower to operate millions of wallets and it will an administrative problem from hell. Plus customers would like to have a single fix Amazon wallet to pay into. Not a new one every time they buy something. The marketing department will go insane if it is known in the market that Amazon is not willing to run a very cheap node to operate their billion dollar operations.

Yeah, your example is unironically becoming zuckbucks. I dont want my identity/business tied to a single account that anybody can track and see on the network.

[Anonymous No.14646083]

>>14645983
Sept 2nd was the day the insider dropped the tip on Brendan and the team day trading. Look at the price chart then look at the TG. All the proof is there, including where they scrubbed it.
If you keep saying show me proof it doesnt mean it doesnt exist. Its obvious what happened, you can only deny it if you are delusional bagholder who drank all the koolaid.
That or you are a DAG employee or at least paid to be here which is why you ignore the facts right in front of your face.

[Anonymous No.14646169]

>>14635661
wait you fuck what about UTNP ?

[Anonymous No.14646311]

>>14646073
>Yeah, your example is unironically becoming zuckbucks
I can make as many wallets I want and tracking DAG will not be feasible at all. So I can pay to Amazon's fix wallet address without them knowing who paid them. Amazon as a regulated business will have to identify their income, costs etc. That does NOT turn DAG into Zuckbucks. Insane accusation.

So what will the total costs for commie coin Nano be with 100 000 TPS? You have NO clued, do you? And neither does the Nano foundation. That should tell you anything you need to know about Nano. Their whole business model is that people will work as volunteers for that network and take all the costs for all eternity for free. Has that crazy business model ever worked? How many public toilets have you cleaned for free? As soon as the price of Nano stabilizes and people will not be motivated to run the Nano network due to future price movements, the whole system will come crashing down. It's just as retarded as believing that people will set up public toilets all over the world and clean them for free. Pure Mickey Mouse economics.

[Anonymous No.14646339]

>>14646083
>insider
What insider? How do you know it was an insider? Salty pre-sale bagholders stupidly dumping their bags, crashing the price and then fud the hell out off Constellation as some kind of sociopathic "revenge" is not evidence for an insider. Retarded reasoning.

[Anonymous No.14646362]

>>14635661
>Give me a better 1000x
protip I can't

[Anonymous No.14646365]

>>14646169
Yes, what about UTNP?

[Anonymous No.14646451]

>>14646339
Lets see if your strawman argument adds up.

One guy posts on biz 24/7 and doesnt sleep.
Fuds it to get revenge because of the price drop.
The team refuses to answer if the allegations are true to the point the token price collapses to almost zero and the community disappears.
A 30% drop in price in a single day after the news breaks and demands from hundreds of people in their TG and they still refuse to make a simple clarifying statement it wasnt true.
The team paid shills visciously attacking anyone who brings it up, admins in TG banning anyone who asks and scrubbing all evidence of the discussion.
After total collapse the team fires half their staff and goes silent for 9 months.


>Yeah must be one salty bag holder, no truth to this at all.

You are either fully retarded, or paid to sit here and make up lark bullshit to deflect from the truth. Fuck you either way.

[Anonymous No.14646561]

>>14646451
1. The one you accuse openly and public stated you all you fudders are liars.
2. Why you want to team to comment on your completely unfounded and insane accusation, especially after debunked by the one you accuse, is pure insanity. What company operates like that ever? Are you mental or just very low IQ?
3. That salty bagholders will take revenge is already documented by their tweets
4. Volume has always been very low in Kucoin, very easy to dump the price 30% plus the ousting of the CEO was real and will always result in turbulence in the market. You idiot believe it is EVIDENCE for that idiot claiming he was an insider, with no proof given, no substantiating, was in fact real. Double digit IQ "reasoning".

You guys are the most retarded fudders on biz.

[Anonymous No.14646579]

I can't believe I just read this thread from end to end, but I did. Some notes:

1) the FUDer is a one trick pony, yet to provide anything to substance. If all accusations are true, then at worst, the former CEO daytraded the ICO funds. And I'm struggling to understand why this is a big deal. The market was tanking, many projects engaged in far worse things. It says nothing about their ability to produce tech and enterprise relationships, which is really the only thing which matters here

2) the FUDer enjoys the use of hyperbole and likes to bolster his points with evidence that is nearly impossible to verify. "Just scroll back thru 9 months of telegram messages"

3) all FUD is being generated and recycled by the same guy, more or less, it seems. What is their motivation for doing so? Nobody in this shit hole is concerned with ethics. Just comes across as an annoying self righteous cunt with an agenda, financial or psychological. As someone else pointed out, it's likely this guy sold the bottom after bagholding -90% ICO bags for a year, and now can't stand the prospect of noobs profiting off said bags

4) the FUDer continuously refers to the project as vaporware, without ever discussing the codebase or technical architecture. My guess is that they really have no understanding of CS, and as such, it undermines their other claims

5) There is at least one turbo shiller here, also twisting some facts. Likely one of the TG squatters.

as usual, the truth lies somewhere in the middle. There's a lot of uncertainty clouding this project, but mainnet is supposedly going live this quarter. The car geo-data stream was impressive and shows they've at least got something. Probably one of the better shitcoin bets out there

[Anonymous No.14646597]

>>14646311
Lmaooo, you moron. You proved the exact point I was trying to make earlier in the thread.

Nothing is fucking free. Do you think a corporation would dedicate money to create and maintain their own node if there was a way to get all your transactions processed for free? Don't you think they'd prefer that?

Unless you're saying that receiving addresses (i.e. Amazon) will be charged the transaction fee? Unless not running your own node makes the network untrusted? Unless you think these corporations are willing to foot the bill for a node out of the warmness of their hearts to advance technology? Get real.

[Anonymous No.14646603]

DAG bag holder here since 2018. Let's all calm down and have a real conversation. The day trading rumors look like they are true based on circumstantial evidence. The team did ban investors including myself and the TG was scrubbed. Let's not pretend the past didn't happen, a quick search in TG will prove everything said is actually true. The question is how do we move forward. Can someone just get the team to put out a statement? It looks real to me and most of us who have been in DAG from the beginning and if it's real I would like to see evidence of the trades and how much was gained or lost. Then we can move forward in peace. Does everyone agree?

[Anonymous No.14646616]

>>14646451
1. The one you accuse openly and publicly stated you all you fudders are liars.
2. Why do you believe the team will comment on your completely unfounded and insane accusation, especially after debunked by the one you accuse? It's pure insanity. What company operates like that ever? Are you mental or just very low IQ?
3. That salty bagholders will take revenge is already documented by their tweets
4. Volume has always been very low in Kucoin, very easy to dump the price 30% plus the ousting of the CEO was real and will always result in turbulence in the market. You idiot believe it is EVIDENCE for that idiot claiming he was an insider, with no proof given, no substantiating, was in fact real. Double digit IQ "reasoning".

You guys are the most retarded fudders on biz.

[Anonymous No.14646666]

where can i buy

[Anonymous No.14646708]

>>14646597
>Lmaooo, you moron.
>Nothing is fucking free.
Your Nano is supposed to be feeless with people paying for it and working on it for free. You idiot have not even done a cost analysis. Nor has your retarded Nano foundation. Complete amateurs.
>Do you think a corporation would dedicate money to create and maintain their own node if there was a way to get all your transactions processed for free?
Yes, when the costs of avoiding very low frees operating a DAG node or paying for a DAG node is by far much lower than the costs of avoiding to pay. Do you have any idea how much it will cost for Amazon to make billions of small wallets, route bandwith consumption etc to avoid paying for a very cheap DAG node?
>Unless you're saying that receiving addresses (i.e. Amazon) will be charged the transaction fee?
You have no clue what you are talking about. Its all about bandwith consumption. If your bandwith consumption on the internet is too high, i.e. not a private person but a business, you must either pay for the high bandwith consumption with DAG tokens or run a DAG node. The costs of masking that high bandwith consumption will by far outstrip the costs of running or paying for a node.

[Anonymous No.14646787]

>>14646666
Kucoin. DAG or not, good luck with your investments anon :)

[Anonymous No.14646846]

>>14646603
>circumstantial evidence
1. What circumstantial "evidence". Walk us through your reasoning. Use documented facts and logic only.

2. Even if true (it is not) as long as they have enough money to continue, something confirmed publicly, and even burned their own tokens (clearly not in lack of money), whatever happened will have zero impact on the future of DAG. Your comment makes zero logical sense.

[Anonymous No.14646950]

>>14646616
The entire community demanded an exact response from the team and former CEO. What they got was some abstract bullshit that fudders are liars and the funds are safu.

When your token gets dumped hard by literally everyone and you are banning people left and right for asking and demanding clarification its suspicious af.

You have to be a fucking retarded brainlet from arkansas to believe they honestly arent guilty. The amount of denial ITT is disgusting.

[Anonymous No.14647115]

>>14646846
Community disbanded, team refusing to answer a simple one sentence categorical denial of the allegations after huge pressure from the community.
Massive selloff of tokens in response by most major bagholders.

Do you need more? All of that is documented except what was scrubbed from the TG. Besides everyone in the DAG community saw what went down so there is no point denying it happened or trying to spin it as nothing special, it was devastating.

If rumors are true it shows the team is dishonest and mismanaged funds which is a problem. The bigger problem is lack of funds moving forward. The team said they have plenty of funding but with no marketing, community building, and exchanges it's suspicious. Plus if they lied about the CEO and trading issue can we just trust them at their word? These are big issues for quite a few people and part of the reason there is no liquidity or major interest in DAG. I would like to see this fixed but see the team and Marines are hardening their position which will not end well. People who don't FUD this project want this resolved asap and don't see a valid reason why they won't make a statement to clear things up once and for all.

[Anonymous No.14647169]

>>14646950
>>14647115
> huge pressure from the community.
>The entire community demanded
Vile spamming from one guy with VPN and his buddy that lost 500K due to market crash. See pic >>14645641
Both of you hate to see DAG succeed after you sold all your DAGs and lost everything in the crypto crash of 2018.

[Anonymous No.14647255]

>>14647169
All evidence was scrubbed from the TG. Go look for yourself. It happened, check the first week of September 2018 in TG. The whole fucking community demanded a specific response. What they got (the funds are safu) comment in a private chat screenshot by a DAG cheerleader and paraded around as proof.
What happened next was an utter buttfucking of the token price and collapse of the community. You can keep pretending but this shit happened and everyone knows it.
I understand your goal is to dupe noobies who didnt know about it which is why you all went radio silent for 9 fucking months.
DAG will either answer the allegations specifically or die a slow death.

[Anonymous No.14647283]

>>14647169
I think this guy's criticisms are genuine.>>14647115


This guy is a self righteous prick. >>14646950
Pretty bullish if a guy who dedicates his life to FUDing can't provide one coherent argument against the tech, other than endlessly calling it vaporware. I couldn't give a fuck if they spent the ICO money on hookers, as long as they produce a nice product that sells

[Anonymous No.14647296]

>>14647169
Don't loop me in with this guy, I am not a fudder and still own half my original bag. I want to see this cleared up so we can succeed. Being a rabid fanboi isn't going to solve our problem. Transparency will work and I am pushing for the team to just come clean and clarify it's financial position so we know the funds are plentiful and will take us to a big launch into the market

[Anonymous No.14647300]

>>14647255
>scrubbed
>scrubbed
>scrubbed
dude how about you post the fucking screenshots yourself. You know full well that nobody here gives enough of a fuck to scroll thru 9 months of TG messages. Is that even possible? There's nothing worse than cunts who base their arguments on evidence that can hardly be checked

[Anonymous No.14647331]

>>14647169
you need to stop assuming everyone is concern trolling under a VPN. The FUD fag is psychologically deficient and can only talk about this project with a vicious tone

[Anonymous No.14647393]

>>14647283
Im not arguing against the tech. I am arguing against the team. They got caught in a huge lie and many people lost alot of money because of it. They didnt lose their money, they lost OUR money. Fuck you if you dont understand that much. Then again you probably didnt invest at all and just getting paid to sit here and battle the fud so the team never has to answer.
I know who is who in these threads because the paid shills could care less no matter how obvious. You guys are doing backflips just like back when this first came out. Telling everyone the CEO going missing for 3 months could have meant he was on vacation and its none of our business. Only a paid shill or teammember would whitewash a big issue like that instead of wanting to know the truth.
This is why the community disbanded. The only people left standing were paid shills, all the smart money left in a hurry.

[Anonymous No.14647448]

>>14647393
well sorry you lost money. As leddit would say, you don't lose until you sell though, kek

you have to look at this from the perspective of someone like me, who just started looking into this project about two weeks ago. All of you guys seem like complete emotionally attached retards (on both sides) arguing about nonsense. I just see a super low cap DAG with a working product that is ready to launch after nearly a year of stealth mode. No better time to invest. If I lose I lose.

[Anonymous No.14647504]

>>14647283
Thank you. The FUD does look real so let's just get a statement one way or the other and assess the damage if any. All these crazy moonbois trying to crucify anyone who asks makes DAG look bad.
And for God sake someone ban those same people from TG they are killing the community. Doxxing kids and claiming everyone is on a VPN makes this project look like its just a bunch of lambomooners

[Anonymous No.14647617]

>>14647300
How long have you been involved in this project? If you say you are in from the start you are a liar because this is common knowledge.
If you are a noob go DYOR faggot its sitting right their in TG. Check the whole month of September. Im sure some honest daggat will post them here today so if you wanna be lazy just wait, im not going back to dig it up again.

[Anonymous No.14647647]

I just picked up 90K to become a DAGgot now just to see, because the tech looks pretty solid after looking through their project and comparing it to NANO that i'm holding now.

I still would like to see some confirmation about its quantum ready status and how it deals with the Node necessity issue that NANO was walled off by in terms of large turnover for usage, but overall it seems to be a better NANO and would easily 100x in closing the market cap between in and NANO, so it looks like a healthy ROI as the Bull season kicks up compared to just continuing to hold NANO bags or IOTA bags.

I definitely want a "DAG" in my portfolio going forward for the potential they offer to the crypto space, and Constellation seems the most solid especially with the devs burning their stacks as a sign of good faith. While the dodging of their prior CEO question of how they fucked around earlier, I see this at least as a solid long if nothing else compared to every other DAG (Byteball, NANO, IOTA).

[Anonymous No.14647676]

>>14647296
>>14647115
>Don't loop me in with this guy, I am not a fudder
OK, I value this anons opinion>>14647283
so I will look into your comment.

>Community disbanded,
Old CEO had to go. That after the price tanked during crypto crash and crypto winter. Some bagholders freaked out, dumped their bats with insane losses and started to try to destroy DAG as some kind of revenge. DAG went into stealth mode. More people freaked out and the price tanked.

>team refusing to answer a simple one sentence categorical denial
Old CEO has categorically denied the accusations multiple times, publicly. One example. >>14641044
When you have a start up with strong personalities with infighting, there will be much bad blood and when one party have to go, there will normally be a non-disclosure agreement. Meaning that the DAG team is forbidden by contract law to say anything bad about old CEO, why he had to go, or even positive things (because that can be camouflaged criticism etc.) Only one person can then legally comment and debunk, the old CEO and he did. This is why the fudders don't care at all about the contacting the old CEO but only goes after the DAG management team.
>Massive selloff of tokens in response by most major bagholders.
False. Very low volume. Most bagholders was hodling.
>The bigger problem is lack of funds moving forward
Team has already denied that. They burned tokens for one million, not something you do if you have money problems. They are hiring. Operations are operating as normal there is NO indication of money problems. There is NO indication of validity of the losses through day-trading claim.
>but with no marketing, community building, and exchanges it's suspicious
That's what you normally do AFTER mainnet. In this case, Q3 2019.

[Anonymous No.14647773]

free 50DAG http://orion.constellationlabs.io/referrals/RREHsesN6MCnIJeWixrz6BiNdWStOrsrO9ZRSUij/

[Anonymous No.14647978]

I was invited by someone on 4chan to join the Telegram and ask if someone could clear up the CEO Daytrading FUD. They assured me that these claims would be vehemently denied by the team. What I got instead was ZERO response from the team, hostile reactions from the community, and subsequent bans from all three Telegram channels. The team was active in the Telegram chats at the time and actively ignored my requests for comment before I was banned. I was called a barrage of different names by various community members, most notably RP, CSW, Rich, Crypto Hog, Vito, Xoomer-Kun, N B, Crypto Headroom and Eb. These 10 individuals are behaving in a manor that is extremely toxic to the Constellation Community and will likely scare off any potential investors who are directed to the Telegram from here.

[Anonymous No.14648030]

>>14647647
Nope you are lying. Nobody just picked up 90k dag. You realize we can check that right you fucking clown. Go shill somewhere else

[Anonymous No.14648124]

>>14648030
Dude check the buy orders on Kucoin/BTC, just bought within the last few hours. 90K DAG doesn't cost that much, its a measely $500 USD, why are you making a big deal out of this?

>>14647773
I signed up and I didn't get shit. What am I missing here.

[Anonymous No.14648138]

>>14647978
Oops, that was 9* names, others were involved in the verbal assault as well but those were the names I jotted down before my bans.

[Anonymous No.14648167]

>>14647676
I appreciate you not attacking me but I have to wholeheartedly disagree with your assessment.
This all happened before the CEO left, which is another thing they wouldn't talk about for months and pissed everyone off.
The selloff was massive and the trading books will clearly show it. Most bagholders dumped hence the 90% drop and it was directly correlated to the FUD they wouldn't answer.
The team never answered the FUD, I wish they had but their answers were frankly total bullshit and made it obvious they were guilty. Especially the way it all went down, it was super weird and the way they went out of their way to avoid answering the direct question shocked all of us.
Token burn means nothing to me, those tokens shouldn't have been in their possession to begin with. Not saying I didn't appreciate it but it was just putting a band-aid on a bullet wound.

[Anonymous No.14648484]

>>14648167
Whole market crashed and later went through crypto winter. DAG was hit harder, but not that much if you compare with alt-coins CMC. One Japanese whale started to sell his giant bag after team refused to give him inside information. I heard rumours that the old CEO tried to give him gray inside information and the rest of the team freaked out, afraid of getting themselves into legal trouble. I also hear that one of the Asian advisers started to dump, as he needed money and later had to go to jail. Never bother to look into this, but guess the guy can be easily identified and verified if true. The later fudding and rambling every single day in summer 2018 had little impact on the price. Maybe destroyed a potential recoil after the massive Japanese whale and/or Asian adviser dumping. This "insider" was clearly mental and rambled on about he having seen them do coke, talking about exit scamming, police investigation, SEC investigation, secret contacts to the DA etc. Insane rambling. DAG lost its momentum and when DAG went stealth to build, it was a desert. Now everything has changed and the fudder has been proven wrong. That's why he is so hysterical. Nobody from summer 2018 believes his lies anymore. The "insider".

[Anonymous No.14648541]

>>14648484
>66 posts by this ID

Holy crap, not even Dero shills are this bad, and even that Dero scam is better than your garbage coin

[Anonymous No.14648571]

>>14648541
>Dero scam is better than your garbage coin
Present you logical reasoning. Use only documented facts. Go on.
>66 posts by this ID
For the most part I answer questions. Is that a problem for you?

[Anonymous No.14648577]

>>14648541
The scumbags behind this shitcoin's community are some of the most dishonest and amoral pieces of shit in this entire space. They want nothing but to lure in newfags from reddit to pump their shitcoin so they can finally dump their bags on someone at break even.

[Anonymous No.14648595]

>>14648577
It honestly doesn't surprise me. DAG threads are some of the worst threads on /biz/, and that says a lot considering all the dumb Fantom threads I see.

[Anonymous No.14648629]

>>14647978
Who said you could go to telegram and get a statement from the DAG team based on those nonsense accusations? Can you show me the comment? What is your name/id in telegram?

[Anonymous No.14648637]

>>14648571
>For the most part I answer questions
Answer me this one- Did Brendan Playford, former CEO of Constellation Labs, daytrade ICO funds? If he didn't, then why won't the team even deny these allegations?

[Anonymous No.14648664]

>>14648637
See >>14647676

[Anonymous No.14648684]

>>14648629

[Anonymous No.14648708]

>>14648629
I did not act like a "cunt" in the Telegram, I was completely respectful even in the face of numerous unwarranted insults thrown my direction. My Telegram name is Ortega.

[Anonymous No.14648754]

>>14648664
That's a bullshit cop out and you know it. There's no reason why they can't address the accusation in a direct manner. You're lying through your teeth you slimy piece of shit.

[Anonymous No.14648769]

>>14648684
This is not an answer to my qeustion:
>Who said you could go to telegram and get a statement from the DAG team based on those nonsense accusations?

[Anonymous No.14648785]

>>14648484
Man I can't buy into this nonsense. You are going out of your way to make it sound like it was all one person doing the damage, posting in Biz and TG. I posted in both demanding answers and was attacked by the usual TG shills both here and community. I am not some new curious trader I have been here the whole time. It is not how you say it was and it wasn't some similar situation as other similar projects. Everyone dumped it to the bottom for a reason and nobody is buying it back now for the same reasons as before.
The team has to clear this up and make a definitive statement contradicting the FUD. I saw all the other FUD being posted but to me it looked more like those crazies from their TG trying to discredit the original FUD by introducing fake FUD. It was obvious and even the fudders denied it and tried to keep focus on the CEO and the teams involvement.
I just want answers, I'm tired of this ride and tired of the community and their treatment of me and others trying to understand what happened and how it impacts the project. This is a long term moonshot and if they lost even 5-10M day trading it matters. If they lied to us it matters. Please stop trying to pretend otherwise or we will look worse every day and become the laughing stock of crypto

[Anonymous No.14648811]

>>14648708
>I did not act like a "cunt" in the Telegram
True. You were polite, that being said, you were a dishonest and trolled like crazy. The guy inviting you in was the master troll himself. I did not post a comment, I never do, so you don't know who I am.

[Anonymous No.14648821]

>>14648769
I showed you the comment and I told you my Telegram name, I do not have anyone's name on an anonymous image board. To be honest though, based on the writing style and frequent replies that they submitted in the other thread, I have to say it really seems like you are the anon who directed me to Telegram.

[Anonymous No.14648828]

>>14648785
>You are going out of your way to make it sound like it was all one person doing the damage, posting in Biz and TG.
I said the opposite. I said he had little impact. Here:
>You are going out of your way to make it sound like it was all one person doing the damage, posting in Biz and TG.

[Anonymous No.14648842]

>>14648811
This isn't trolling and nothing I've done should have given off any vibes of dishonesty.

[Anonymous No.14648882]

>Partnership negotiations with NASA, General Motors and Denso

This right here is the biggest red flag I've ever seen. Their official website (https://constellationlabs.io/)) would have ZERO ISSUES putting this on their main page as if they DID have partnerships with them, they would want to promote the heck out of them. Also:

>DAG has smart contracts

No. It doesn't. DAG doesn't have smart contracts. DAG doesn't even have smart contracts on its testnet. At least Dero has had working, verifiable smart contracts on its testnet since Jan 2019. This whole DAG coin is a joke.

[Anonymous No.14648887]

>>14648785
>if they lost even 5-10M day trading it matters
You base that on a claim from an "insider" that lied in the summer of 2018 about team doing coke, team exit scamming, team being arrested any day, team investigated by the police, by SEC, insider belonging to a secret U.N organization, insider with even inside information about DA, could not provide a single point of evidence for his rambling, due to the ongoing "investigation".

We all know that this "insider" guy lied through his teeth, but you act is if what he said is perfectly trustworthy. That makes zero logical sense.

[Anonymous No.14648899]

This thread is looking bullish.

[Anonymous No.14648902]

>>14648842
You made one mistake you asked a direct question they can't answer without destroying their project and facing legal consequences as well as lawsuits.
This team is as dishonest as they come, they have nothing but hate and rabid fanbois in their community and they push them to attack all criticism.
Remember this team doesn't give a fuck about their investors, this was a cash grab plain and simple. Sure they will do some programming and try to make something real bit understand their odds of success are near zero, kind of like their bank account

[Anonymous No.14648904]

>>14648821
>I have to say it really seems like you are the anon who directed me to Telegram.
No, I was in the thread and posted the same pics as here. It was not me. You talked to the masterfudder, but sound a lot like Raphael.

[Anonymous No.14648939]

>>14648577
>>14648595
more hyperbole and seething language. Every person from every crypto is trying to dump bags on a new sucker. The only question is how long can it be sustained.

>>14648708
did you try forwarding a message? I got banned by a glitch that auto bans you when you try to forward a message

[Anonymous No.14648951]

>>14648939
More buzzwords that mean absolutely nothing. You refuse to acknowledge the partnerships are fake. You refuse to acknowledge that, no, DAG does NOT have smart contracts "yet", and yet you promote it like it's a done fact.

[Anonymous No.14648970]

>>14648939
I did not get banned for forwarding a message, I was banned for bringing up a topic that many people in the Constellation community are desperately afraid of acknowledging.

[Anonymous No.14648995]

>>14648904
I am not Raphael. Raphael writes in British English.

[Anonymous No.14649022]

>>14648887
The insider guy made one post iirc which said if you want to see DAG squirm go ask them one simple question. "Did the CEO Brendan Playford day trade investor funds on exchanges and how much did he lose?
That one post setoff a shit storm that crushed the community and the token. That is a fucking fact
All the other bullshit about Coke and SEC was a lark made up by the team. Nobody believed anybody it. Everyone just wanted confirmation on the insiders post which turned into the biggest shit show in crypto

[Anonymous No.14649034]

>>14648951
Why do you talk to me like we were having a dialogue, or as if I even mentioned any of those things?

[Anonymous No.14649059]

>>14649022
This.

Thread over.

[Anonymous No.14649103]

>>14648995
Everyone is Raphael to these insane lunatics. Raphael is the scapegoat used by the rabid fanbois to pretend it's all one guy, 24/7 posting without sleep. They doxxed the poor kid and his parents for crying out loud. The community is fucking disgusting, they doxxed a bunch of other people in the past too trying desperately to figure out who the insider was. Fuck DAG and especially fuck the team for not only allowing this to happen but promoting it.
They are desperate to make this go away. There are quite a few investors who would love nothing more than to bury them in lawsuits for the shit they are pulling. If I was that Raph guy I would sue the shit out of them and force them to reveal the name of the guy who doxxed him. Fuck this team

[Anonymous No.14649122]

>>14635661
Link. This one was to easy anon cmon

[Anonymous No.14649136]

>>14649022
>All the other bullshit about Coke and SEC was a lark made up by the team
Sure, the team fudded themselves like hell and like nobody before them, every. single.day whole summer, right? Not only that, they even used their beloved VPN and went crazy with multiple IDs and personalities, like pic >>14641247
Great strategy, instead of just ignoring it, and let it fade away, they managed to fud every single day and demand that the community spammed the team until they gave an answer,. And it ALL was done by the team, and not some salty bagholder psycho that wanted to take revenge, right? That makes sense for you? Do you believe your own comment?

[Anonymous No.14649199]

>>14649136
Yes this is actually true. They would stop at nothing to deflect from the CEO day trading issue. It would destroy them and answering is impossible. Defrauding investors and covering it up is serious business.
But I see you are obviously a TG rabid moonbois and a paid shill. No point telling you facts you already know

[Anonymous No.14649249]

>>14649199
since we're assigning labels, what should you be called?

[Anonymous No.14649521]

Polling on what you think the trolls motives are:

https://www.strawpoll.me/18286954

[Anonymous No.14649532]

>>14649249
He's a saint for taking the time out of his day to shut down you shills before any redditors lose their money on your vaporware scam.

[Anonymous No.14649660]

i unironically live in san francisco and would do nothing more than to go to their office to ask if the former ceo daytraded funds

seems like a good youtube video desu senpai

[Anonymous No.14649768]

>>14649660
Do it pls anon

[Anonymous No.14649893]

>>14649660
Last I heard they are located in a WeWork shared office in the Financial District. That's all I can tell you.

[Anonymous No.14649926]

>>14649249
Im not asking for a label or giving a name. You pieces of human trash doxxed a child and his parents accusing him of something he didnt even do. Shame on you fucking cunts.
The fact that you do all this shit and the team not only supports it but encourages it disgusts me. This project will go down in history as the biggest shitshow since Bitconnect

[Anonymous No.14649953]

>>14649893
>Wework

sounds like a company with $30M cant afford a proper office. Weworks are temporary work spaces, show me a company with $30M in funding inside a fucking wework LOL

[Anonymous No.14650027]

Here is what doesn't make sense in why these shills are in here and TG attacking everyone. If the tech is amazing and the team is guilty the token price will collapse to almost nothing then they could buy it up super cheap. The tech comes out and proves itself and shills make a fortune.
Instead they rabidly protect the team and spread misinformation and deflection from the core issue making it look bad, poisoning the community which deters newcomers and ensures the project fails.
Why not just be objective like I am, let it play out fairly, don't artificially protect the team or poison the community. I don't understand their logic. It makes me think those in the TG and shilling here are actually employees worried about legal trouble.

[Anonymous No.14650047]

>>14635661
Bet this is the same guy who spams nano

[Anonymous No.14650304]

>>14650027
I think they (the team thus the ones paying the shills) see a much different outcome. They may face a legal inquiry and personal lawsuits. Whatever the case they are fighting to the death to avoid this topic and probably know how exposed they are

[Anonymous No.14650463]

>>14649953
kek they're in a wework in SF?

literally self-funded tier

anyone with any connections will at least be working out of a house or a garage in the mission

look at a project like ONE. they're in a house in PA.

or RSR. same shit, but in Oakland.

Sounds like they're out of money and FUCKED

[Anonymous No.14650487]

Best 1000x is VID.

>Tier 1 exchange listing in 1 month
>big name influencers on board
> rising 10-20% daily

[Anonymous No.14651553]

Moral of the story DAG shills got BTFO ITT.

[Anonymous No.14651604]

>>14635661
>Mentions nano 7x times in single post

Thanks, just bought 100k.

[Anonymous No.14651669]

>>14651553
And rightfully so. Sleaziest shit I've seen since the paid Bitmain shills tried tricking normies into buying BCH