APOLOGIZE

[Anonymous No.10896876]

[Anonymous No.10896909]

>>10896876
She will deliver us from pain and poverty !

[Anonymous No.10896927]

$5 incoming LOL non-nano holders BTFO

[Anonymous No.10896929]

100K sats by next week

[Anonymous No.10897044]

here it comes fellas

strap in

we're in for a ride

[Anonymous No.10897846]

>>10896876
20 dollars by tomorrow night. Get the FUCK IN

[Anonymous No.10897861]

STEALING at these prices

[Anonymous No.10897881]

This is criminal

[Anonymous No.10897922]

We're gonna create herstory Reddit!

[Anonymous No.10897927]

plz sirs

[Anonymous No.10897929]

i'm so happy right now guys we're going to be millionaires

[Anonymous No.10898041]

This is the time where you take 80% of your prfits (if you are retarded enough no to take 100% kek)

You will be justed so FUCKING hard I am already crying inside from laughter

[Anonymous No.10898056]

yes wow such a huge moon oh boy

[Anonymous No.10898068]

>>10896876

I'm sorry I sold at $18. So sorry.

[Anonymous No.10898070]

>>10898056

wow such a massive loser mad at my gains

[Anonymous No.10898081]

>>10898056
That is literally how the last 1.000% run started. When will you learn?

[Anonymous No.10899005]

>>10896876
756 TPS, nodes issues all the time, nearly all exchanges down at least once this month due to node issues, pending law suit against the devs and foundation, devs can't even make a secure nano app. Weekend high school project that will die.

Pic, Nano hodler getting assraped since Jan 2016 buying some more, while screaming: "2 da mooooOoooooOOoon!"

[Anonymous No.10899014]

>>10896876
Nano has many problems, only 7560 TPS, constant law suits against the nodes, Gary Coxxon making no videos. I have sold everything and so should you.

[Anonymous No.10899017]

>>10898081
Last run was based on a 7000 TPS lie. Reality was 100-200 TPS.

[Anonymous No.10899028]

>>10899014
You Nano fanboys never give up, do you? Lies and distortion is all you have.

[Anonymous No.10899052]

>>10899028
Are you dense? I'm not a fanboy, I sold everything because the node isn't random on Android and Colin was at high school unlike Vechain devs.

[Anonymous No.10899061]

DOGE is mooning. You know when DOGE starts to moon you're in for a massive correction.

[Anonymous No.10899068]

>>10899052
Rage some more, Nano psycho. You failed theater school. As always you idiots have no arguments and can't defend your shitcoin. To da mooooon, schmuck.

[Anonymous No.10899102]

>>10899068
>Nano has 756 TPS [1]. For a self-proclaimed global currency, it’s a total joke. VISA can handle over 56,000 TPS [2]. Nano’s claim to be global currency is either delusional or fraud.
>7,000 TPS was boosted and promoted in Dec 2017. Reality, a meagre 100-200 TPS [3].
>Lead Devs are jumping ship. Insiders obviously know Nano is riddled with terminal flaws and future problems.
>Millions of USD sold from the Nano Developer Wallet lately at extremely low prices. Not a good sign that Devs are dumping Nano in fire sale [4].
>Dev fund is dangerously low, they may burn through that in a matter of 1-3 years [4]. Also; pending lawsuit against Nano foundation.
>Constant node issues. Withdrawals/deposits suspended on several exchanges due to security and stability issues, multiple times, every single month. This despite being miles behind having any sort of global currency traffic. Nano could be years away from even having the potential to be a well-functioning global currency. One example from today [5].
>Coinbase will only use coins stable for multiple months. Nano is far away from that, see above and [5]. Best case scenario is having Nano on Coinbase late 2019, leaving Nano hopelessly behind other cryptocurrencies.
>One single miner can destroy the network via DDoS with 500 GPUs at no cost. A critical attack vector never seriously addressed by the Nano dev team. Nano is wide open for a massive spam attack crippling the network for a long time. Not ready for global adoption.
>Nano team seem like tech amateurs. Don’t understand the difference between Random (not cryptographically secure) and SecureRandom. Don’t even understand basic cryptography, disaster in waiting.

[Anonymous No.10899108]

>>10899068
>Same whales that pumped and dumped Nano first time (-98% from ATH) are doing it again. The delusional Nano hodlers will be stripped of their money again.
>NANO was less than $0.10 a year ago.
>Anyone investing in this shitcoin deserves to lose their money. It will crash and go to zero.

[Anonymous No.10899114]

everybody point out how the tech sucks misses the point. the tech could be great, but nano is still a failure as far as a currency goes, because it's just yet another alt with a completely broken distribution/supply.

people will work hard to make bitcoin succeed, nobody other than the nano developers with huge piles of their own coin, or any other alt, are working on their coin, but the rest of the world just isn't interested, and no amount of tech, or "partnerships" is going to change that. you can't just keep trying the bitcoin playbook over and over again and expect your alt out of hundreds to be the one that works.

[Anonymous No.10899126]

>>10899114
Nano is doomed, no adoption, no Gary Cockson, no BitGrail partnership. Going to $0.10 in 2017, sell now!

[Anonymous No.10899133]

>>10899102
>>10899108
Those are REAL arguments, Nano homo. You messed them up deliberately to defend your shitcoin. Nice smokescreen, Nanofag. Nice way of defending your failing idiot-coin. 2 da mooooOooon, schmuck.

[Anonymous No.10899157]

>>10899126
Always fun to see you Nano homos defend your shitcoin. You can't answer valid criticism at all, but must retort to ad hominem attacks, smear and you pretending to be critical of Nano. Same bullshit your sycophant community pulled when rambling on about 7 000 TPS when in reality you only had 100-200. Keep the lies coming, Nano sucker.

[Anonymous No.10899164]

>>10899133
Name one real argument that isn't made up FUD, I dare you.

[Anonymous No.10899179]

>>10899164
Here you go, Nano nigger >>10873614

Your sales pitch is like a meth seller in da hood.

[Anonymous No.10899180]

>>10899179
I said name ONE REAL argument.

[Anonymous No.10899187]

>>10899180
Yeah, answer ONE of them, if you dare. But you can't. As I said, ALL you Nano idiots have is smear, ad hominem and lies. You can't defend your crashed shitcoin and tech wreck.

[Anonymous No.10899188]

I was told to put whatever savings I had into NANO back when it was $30, by someone who was "lucky" to have bought in at $7
Guess what I did

[Anonymous No.10899225]

>>Nano has 756 TPS [1]. For a self-proclaimed global currency, it’s a total joke.

PayPal does 200 TPS. If Nano gets as big as PayPal, we're fine.

>>Lead Devs are jumping ship.

Shapiro left, wasn't a lead dev but responsible for the wallet fuck up. Who else? Busch just became an actual employee, was part time before.

>Not a good sign that Devs are dumping Nano in fire sale

They're making sure they're able to keep the development going even if we suffer a multiple year bear market. Makes sense.

>>Dev fund is dangerously low, they may burn through that in a matter of 1-3 years [4].

You're countering your own argument here.

> Also; pending lawsuit against Nano foundation.

Joke lawsuit.

>>Constant node issues. Withdrawals/deposits suspended on several exchanges due to security and stability issues, multiple times, every single month.

No issues for months.

>>Coinbase will only use coins stable for multiple months. Nano is far away from that, see above and [5].

Because Coinbase always gets coins to moon, right? Like ETC.

> Best case scenario is having Nano on Coinbase late 2019, leaving Nano hopelessly behind other cryptocurrencies.

Because...?

>>One single miner can destroy the network via DDoS with 500 GPUs at no cost.

Explain how.

>>Nano team seem like tech amateurs. Don’t understand the difference between Random (not cryptographically secure) and SecureRandom. Don’t even understand basic cryptography, disaster in waiting.

Was Shapiro's friend, guess why he left. Not true for the non-Android wallets.

[Anonymous No.10899232]

>>10898056
>this is a suckers rally

[Anonymous No.10899482]

>>10899225
>PayPal does 200 TPS. If Nano gets as big as PayPal, we're fine.
Comparing to PayPal is ridiculous. You don't buy your coffee with paypal. They don't aim to be a global currency for daily life use. Closest is VISA with 56 000 TPS.

>Shapiro left
Yeah, is that a good sign? That devs are leaving. Do you know why he left? No. Do you have any idea how the financial market would react if something like that happened with no explanation given? Of course you Nano fanboys are too blind, fanatic, stupid to even question what happened and even worse, question why no real explanation given.

>They're making sure they're able to keep the development going even if we suffer a multiple year bear market. Makes sense.
They could have sold at 35 but choose suddenly to sell at 1-3. That only makes sense if you are a deluded and fanatic nano fanboy.

>You're countering your own argument here.
How?

>Joke lawsuit.
Sure, tell me more about the millions of nanos abruptly trafficked by Nano devs and their friends right before BitGrail exploded, when withdrawals were under "maintenance" for the nano ordinary investors, while constantly reassuring them that Bitgrail was perfectly fine. No need to worry. Pic 4 days before BitGrail went under. https://www.reddit.com/r/nanocurrency/comments/7xqxqu/500_thousand_nano_was_moved_today_out_of_one_of/duaj73z/

>No issues for months.
Total lie. Last 30 days. http://archive.fo/v2noA

>Because Coinbase always gets coins to moon, right? Like ETC.
Coibase staying away from Nano is a symptom. Not a cause. Learn the difference. Nano "investor"

>Explain how.
One example: https://www.reddit.com/r/nanotrade/comments/7vwl86/what_are_the_faults_of_nano/dtvpymd/

>Was Shapiro's friend
If no one checked the coding, the are utterly incompetent. If they did check the coding and could not see/understand it, utterly incompetent. Either way, dangerously incompetent.