NANO: double deposit Binance

[Anonymous No.10858767]

https://i.imgur.com/2AcuEI5.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/ji0dgxl.jpg

[Anonymous No.10858799]

>>10858767
quick bogdown?

[just a stupid goy No.10858811]

>>10858767
Shut up faggot.

You just sent yourself nano twice.

[Anonymous No.10858826]

Nano double spending exploit !!

[Anonymous No.10858928]

>sends two deposits 10 minutes apart
>my anus leak bug!!!

[Anonymous No.10858939]

The account in question is xrb_3wyzm5e4ih6w84adcjotc3tcscstxee6m9d3h39hseq73hof5uq51gmm6nxk (on binance's end) and the final block hash is 24B66DDF027A5BF8DC7AAD437640C8847DCC8F498F13F866917FD4E1FB8A214C the mysterious other one is 4030D219C91F447CF567AFC1B53A2C2677FF2B1D5BE0BE85727773275688081B If anyone wants to help investigating. Something that's worth noting is that the missing block occured far later on the binance dashboard, so it can't really be a reverted block. And even if that block was intentionally fabricated, any sane node would deny this.

[Anonymous No.10858965]

>>10858767
>Nano has 756 TPS [1]. For a self-proclaimed global currency, it’s a total joke. VISA can handle over 56,000 TPS [2]. Nano’s claim to be global currency is either delusional or fraud.
>7,000 TPS was boosted and promoted in Dec 2016. Reality, a meagre 100-200 TPS [3].
>Lead Devs are jumping ship. Insiders obviously know Nano is riddled with terminal flaws and future problems.
>Millions of USD sold from the Nano Developer Wallet lately at extremely low prices. Not a good sign that Devs are dumping Nano in fire sale [4].
>Dev fund is dangerously low, they may burn through that in a matter of 1-3 years [4]. Also; pending lawsuit against Nano foundation.
>Constant node issues. Withdrawals/deposits suspended on several exchanges due to security and stability issues, multiple times, every single month. This despite being miles behind having any sort of global currency traffic. Nano could be years away from even having the potential to be a well-functioning global currency. One example from today [5].
>Coinbase will only use coins stable for multiple months. Nano is far away from that, see above and [5]. Best case scenario is having Nano on Coinbase late 2019, leaving Nano hopelessly behind other cryptocurrencies.
>One single miner can destroy the network via DDoS with 500 GPUs at no cost. A critical attack vector never seriously addressed by the Nano dev team. Nano is wide open for a massive spam attack crippling the network for a long time. Not ready for global adoption.
>Nano team seem like tech amateurs. Don’t understand the difference between Random (not cryptographically secure) and SecureRandom. Don’t even understand basic cryptography, disaster in waiting.

[Anonymous No.10858970]

>>10858965 (cont.)
>Nano team marketing strategy is to have no marketing strategy.
>Nano team adoption strategy is to have no adoption strategy. Doomed. Will go to zero.
>Nano essentially following same strategy as Betamax vs VHS and HD vs BluRay.
>First coin on Amazon/eBay/etc will be the global currency. Nano’s avoiding partnership. Nano’s publicly stated “strategy” is to not seek strategic partnership, basis being that USD has no partnership as a currency, so why should Nano have one. Ridiculous.
>No smart contracts. Masternode coins utilising high capacity data contracts on their second layer are the future. Nano can't do any of this, it cannot compete with other coins.
>Must run expensive nodes for free. A borderline insane and untested business model.
>Nano team are business amateurs. Pushed BitGrail when clearly a dangerous exchange. Guaranteed bomber as a good guy. Rebranded to Nano right before BitGrail exploded. Retarded decision. Marketing disaster.
>Going from UDP to TCP too late and too slowly [6]
>Hired pretty girl, G. Coxton, who’s done nothing. Why’s she not on YouTube pushing Nano?
>Nano has no ‘human face’ for people to connect with. It’s just an empty logo, unlike other top 10 coins – e.g. Ethereum has Vitalik, Tron has Justin Sun, Litecoin had Charlie Lee. NEO has Da Hong Fei. EOS has Dan L. etc.
>Ongoing lawsuits against Nano Devs personally and Nano foundation. Will drive price down, could go bankrupt.

[Anonymous No.10858972]

>>10858939
Not a nano faggot and not on my computer rn. So you're telling us that these 2 transactions come from the same wallet and have only been spent once? If so sell all your nano and spread the fud. Don't wait

[Anonymous No.10858979]

>>10858970 (cont.)
>Same whales that pumped and dumped Nano first time (-98% from ATH) are doing it again. The delusional Nano hodlers will be stripped of their money again.
>NANO was less than $0.10 a year ago.
>Anyone investing in this shitcoin deserves to lose their money. It will crash and go to zero.

[1] https://www.reddit.com/r/nanocurrency/comments/982bq9/stress_test_beta_network_v15_results_in_here/
[2] https://www.accenture.com/no-en/success-visa-connected-commerce-car
[3] http://archive.is/iq9fP
[4] https://www.nanode.co/account/xrb_1ipx847tk8o46pwxt5qjdbncjqcbwcc1rrmqnkztrfjy5k7z4imsrata9est
[5] https://news.kucoin.com/en/nano-deposits-and-withdrawals-are-now-enabled/
[6] https://www.reddit.com/r/nanocurrency/comments/8kt2ed/universal_block_canary_has_been_released/dzakb0a/

[Anonymous No.10859002]

coordinated discord FUD to try and dump nano price, just like they pumped it.
Anyone could easily fake a binance double deposit using F12.
The screenshot says it's from March, and they're pretending it just barely happened.
hasn't happened to anyone else
also only one transaction is on the blockchain, so it'd be binance's problem, not the blockchain.
discord niggers are pathetic.

[Anonymous No.10859047]

>>10859002
The account in question is xrb_3wyzm5e4ih6w84adcjotc3tcscstxee6m9d3h39hseq73hof5uq51gmm6nxk (on binance's end) and the final block hash is 24B66DDF027A5BF8DC7AAD437640C8847DCC8F498F13F866917FD4E1FB8A214C

the mysterious other one is 4030D219C91F447CF567AFC1B53A2C2677FF2B1D5BE0BE85727773275688081B

Go to nano discord and write "Binance double deposit"

[Anonymous No.10859077]

>>10859047
you just repeated the same shit i already responded to.
KYS

[Anonymous No.10859085]

>>10859002
Not good if this is doctored. Will discredit genuine criticism of Nano.

[Anonymous No.10859090]

>>10858939
Just telling us now about a March 14th incident?

Also, the second block you linked does not exist according to nanode, the first one does.

here is a link to the account on nanode, notice only one 800 nano transaction on 3/14

https://www.nanode.co/account/xrb_3wyzm5e4ih6w84adcjotc3tcscstxee6m9d3h39hseq73hof5uq51gmm6nxk

[Anonymous No.10859265]

>>10858965
Holy shit you are a total faggot. Get a life.

[Anonymous No.10859329]

>>10859265
Great "arguments' there, moron.
>Holy shit you are a total faggot. Get a life
Nice psychological projection. Let me guess, Nano "investor"? Getting assraped since Jan 2018, and now buying some more? Because "mooning"?

[Anonymous No.10859339]

show me the details of the other deposit shithead

[Anonymous No.10859350]

>>10858965
>don’t understand basic cryptography

Do NANO devs have degrees not related to computer-science/software-engineering? I saw the curriculum for compsci students at my local uni and basic cryptography is included

[Anonymous No.10859542]

>>10858767
fake and gay
>>10858811
checked. this
sage

[Anonymous No.10859582]

the FUDders are real and they are not stopping. NANO is the real deal and they know it. MINING CARTELS BTFO. BCASH FAGS BTFO. NANO is better tech and they are mad they stayed with the old guard. NANO is now the automobile and all MINED coins are the horse and buggy. NANO moon guaranteed.
also, sage.