[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 154 KB, 1039x565, CL.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10633210 No.10633210 [Reply] [Original]

So I had a look at the Sibos presentation (once again) and stumbled across something interesting.

If you look at page 26+, you will notice that there is a ChainLink to "120+ members". First I thought that these were EEA members because of the slide's Ethereum theme, but neither Hyperledger nor IBM are members of the EEA.

This leads me to the idea that this is indeed discussing ChainLink Network members. But that would be too insane, wouldn't it?

Can somebody debunk this for me, please?

>> No.10633214

Oh yeah, here's the link to the presentation:

https://create.smartcontract.com/sibos17

>> No.10633221
File: 20 KB, 1024x455, corda.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10633221

>>10633210
I'll just leave this here...

>> No.10633229

>>10633210
oh FUCK.

>> No.10633239

Also, check the Allianz connection, it's legit.

>> No.10633242

>>10633239
source? what connection

>> No.10633249

>>10633214
Those are the Hyperledger affiliated partners that he is referencing.

>> No.10633294

>>10633242
There was a thread about it, apparently Dan Assouline was in contact with Chainlink, don't know if Sergey directly, and he's one of the main guys for Allianz partnerships.

>> No.10633317

>>10633210
This seems like a pretty reasonable, non speculative question to ask in the slack, which Rory would probably respond to.

"On this attached image what are the 120+ referring to?" I got banned for calling rory a nigger but someone else should ask.

>> No.10633318

>>10633210
>No actual news
>Time to refloat some old turds

>> No.10633352

>>10633210
are these 120 more "relationships", such as the "relationship" chainlink still has with swift? "we still have a relationship with swift"

>> No.10633419

>>10633210
I’m pretty sure those “120+ members” are members of hyperledger

>> No.10633876

>>10633210
Riddle Anon mentioned that LINK would probably be incorporated into a consortium of users

>> No.10633909
File: 85 KB, 600x600, 1525379594204.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10633909

>>10633210

>> No.10634439

>>10633317
Ha this made me lol

Would be a good idea though