/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.9995140]

Unironically legitimate 3x picks right now

[Anonymous No.9995154]

all i see are shitcoins

[Anonymous No.9995175]

I love how over the months the delusion went from
everyone promising 1000x to 100x then 10x, and now 3x.

[Anonymous No.9995183]

NANO is the only respectable one.

[Anonymous No.9995191]

>>9995140
Nano is the only good one. IOTA will fail. I'm a software engineer, trust me.

[Anonymous No.9995192]

>>9995183
Portfolio of a man who will end it all.

[Anonymous No.9995206]

A lot of coins have the potential to 3x since that only means "go back to where they were 30 days ago". But for those who don't buy the dip and average down, it will take that to cancel the recent losses, so unless someone has no faith in this and wants to get out, buying more is probably the smart move. The only question is when. I think I'll make another purchase if BTC hits below 6k again, I missed the one that happened earlier today. It might go down more after, but I'm just layering the buy-ins anyway.

[Anonymous No.9995244]

>>9995175
All 4 have had more than 3x their value with BTC at 10k

[Anonymous No.9995277]

>>9995192
Except I already cashed out the bulk of my money and just recently bought back in at low 6k

[Anonymous No.9995285]

>>9995206
I'm sure a lot of people are looking for a nice entry point to add some more fiat, now is a great time and these 4 picks are pretty solid 3x with pretty solid volume

[Anonymous No.9995369]

>>9995285
Why would I buy Nano, when I can buy IOTA
Why would I buy Verge, when can buy IOTA
And what the fuck is the top one even?

[Anonymous No.9995417]

>>9995369
Quantstamp you illegal
But yeah you could just do iota and be safe, imo QSP and IOTA are strongest of the 4

[Anonymous No.9995562]

>>9995369
IOTA is written by people so convinced of their own technical superiority, they emulated ternary/trinary systems on binary ones for no gain whatsoever, designed their own cryptographic schemes on top of this, and in doing so have exposed themselves to all sorts of flaws that any sensible developer could have avoided by using something well understood and battle hardened.

It's a sign of rank amateurism, and it's a sign of incompetent and arrogant software developers. They must know by now that IOTA's tangle does not work; that is why they need a central Coordinator -- and, with that, the tangle itself is entirely pointless. Their whitepaper is intentionally hiding that fact under a ton of irrelevant stuff, including a ton of probability theory (which may be the only thing the inventor was competent in), the ternary arithmetic, etc. The sensible path is always to deliver the functionality you're looking for in as safe and standard a way as possible. There is nothing about what IOTA are trying to deliver that requires novel computing or novel cryptographic approaches.

If IOTA ever gains any sort of market penetration they should expect it to be compromised in all sorts of different ways, as not only have they used their own algorithms and their own constructions but there's bound to be all sorts of oracles built into their ternary emulation.

[Anonymous No.9995782]

>>9995140
>>9995183
>>9995191

cope harder

[Anonymous No.9996748]

>>9995562

>caring this much about something you don't own

IOTA is a good buy right now.

[Anonymous No.9996782]

>>9995562
{Insert Reddit Gold}