Nolinkers why?

[Anonymous No.9783593]

Nolinkers I'm genuinely curious why you don't like/have any link tokens.
Is it because of the stupid pastas?
The fud has kept you from buying?
What's your reason?
Genuine FUD welcome.
I'll try to refute it the best way I can.

[Anonymous No.9783599]

>>9783593
https://www.cnbc.com/video/2018/06/06/sec-chairman-cryptocurrencies-like-bitcoin--not-securities.html

[Anonymous No.9783625]

>>9783599
Link tokens are not securities since they do not guarantee a return of investment by doing nothing. You would need to become a node operator to get more link.

[Anonymous No.9783660]

>>9783593
it's really, really overshilled to the point that it's super annoying to wade through all these stinky link posts and has really ruined my experience with this board.

On a personal investment level, I wouldn't put my own money in to a project that is so far out time-wise from proving itself and has low market potential at best. Even if it became a useful middleware tech company, I see little reason why the price would ever reach very high. The token supply and market cap are middling at best and it's (along with most crypto) highly overvalued already.

[Anonymous No.9783752]

>>9783660
>I see little reason why the price would ever reach very high
As middleware, link could become a gateway for most blockchain projects that need data from API's.
API's right now are the backbone of the internet so chainlink could become the backbone of the blockchain. With that said, if developers needed to fetch data from APIs for a trustless process, node operators would be getting a lot of jobs and staked tokens could decrease the circulating supply and with demand rising the price of the token could rise very high depending on the demand.

>The token supply and market cap are middling at best and it's (along with most crypto) highly overvalued already.
Market cap is low right now because there hasn't been any marketing and there isn't demand for the token yet since the mainnet isn't out yet.
Crypto market cap is extremely undervalued, however 90% of the projects are overvalued.

[Anonymous No.9783857]

>>9783593
jeez where do i start
Sergey took 32 mil from people that he won't even acknowledge update or communicate with.
His top coder dimitri is on permanent vacation
rory, community manager is leaving to go to full time at idex where he is also community manager
competition got their first (iota, zap, cryptlets, oraclize, and others)
We have been on ropsten for a month and have seen no testing which= no interest.
Who going to want to pay a neet node operator and gas fees when iota will do it for free
Latest I heard is sergey took a job in financial industry and chainlink is more of a hobby now
sec just said all coins that had icos are securities. especially if they didn't do kyc
There are two fucking logos and two fucking names (smart contract and chainlink) such bad business
What type of business goes dark and thinks its good for business...
i can go on and on but am tired.

[Anonymous No.9783961]

>>9783857
This pretty much sums it up for me. I'm just holding 5k Link out of pure desperation at this point. I have over half a million Colossus XT too, but I suck at trading so all I do is hold and try to disassociate from my shitty life where I have worked so hard yet achieved so little.

[Anonymous No.9783963]

>>9783857
Bait but I'll bite.
>Sergey took 32 mil from people that he won't even acknowledge update or communicate with.
Link tokens were meant for node operators, not for your average joes. That's why the minimum buy amount was a huge qty of ETH (100 min if I remember correctly).
There's communication in the 2 subreddits and slack. Also we have 24/7 updates on the code on the pivotal tracker and github.
>His top coder dimitri is on permanent vacation.
Dimitri is on temporary vacation right now. True.
>rory, community manager is leaving to go to full time at idex where he is also community manager
competition got their first (iota, zap, cryptlets, oraclize, and others)
False
>We have been on ropsten for a month and have seen no testing which= no interest.
There has been activity in ropsten, you can look at the transactions in here.
https://ropsten.etherscan.io/txs?ea=0x20fe562d797a42dcb3399062ae9546cd06f63280&topic0=0xddf252ad1be2c89b69c2b068fc378daa952ba7f163c4a11628f55a4df523b3ef
There are hundreds of transactions.
>Latest I heard is sergey took a job in financial industry and chainlink is more of a hobby now
False, but he is very well corrected in the financial industry.
>sec just said all coins that had icos are securities. especially if they didn't do kyc
See previous post
>There are two fucking logos and two fucking names (smart contract and chainlink) such bad business
Smartcontract is the company, chainlink is the network.

[Anonymous No.9784026]

>>9783963
sergey's role as ceo is update his investors. Well he knew what the fuck an ico was and knew the coins could change hands...well if you hold link you are an investor in chainlink..its sergey's responsibility to update...unless he wants the sec up his ass for frauding investors

When Dimitri is still gone at end of june you will better understand..i heard from multiple people he is back at loop and tie.

Rory is leaving..you forgot that part...see rory manages a few communities, check out tap project or aurora idex telegram and you will see rory quite a bit...actually rory spends way more time in that community. He is leaving full time to idex because they got so big...

Its public perception and you have oraclize established, corda with working oracles and actual projects, now iota with partners announcing they will go live in 3 weeks, zap on testnet...and chainlink silent. even testnet silent

The activity you are talkking about is link faucet transfers. If you look at actual data requests there are none except for thomas and johnny.

I don't even care about the rest but

[Anonymous No.9784035]

>>9783593
ADVICE TO LINK MARINES
Try a pool cleaner vacuum while underwater, especially with a heated pool, it will give you the best orgasm of your entire life. the fans rapidly but gently smack the head of your dick while giving really strong suction. obviously stick your fingers in first to make sure it's safe, not every pool vacuum is the same. I've had blowjobs from 3 different women and 4 different men, I've used vacuums, cock-pumps, fleshlights, vibrators... and NOTHING compares to the pool cleaner. I'm not even fucking kidding right now, if you get the chance, try it. the only thing that is even remotely close to how good that pool vacuum felt was straight up vaginal sex with this fat chick who had a really warm snatch, it was like sticking my dick into a wet loaf of banana bread straight out of the oven, and yes this fucking pool cleaner vacuum was better than that. I don't own a pool or else I'd be doing it every day. unfortunately the owner of the pool caught me doing it so I'm not allowed to be within 1000 feet of his house anymore but it was so fucking worth it, I'm telling you that fucking pool vacuum is like heaven. honestly the only reason I even want to make it with LINK is so I can afford my own house with a heated pool and of course a pool vacuum. I can't wait to buy a dozen different brands and styles of pool cleaners and fuck them all. I live for that day to come.
ADVICE OVER

[Anonymous No.9784055]

>>9783593
Basically three major red flags:

Excessive bagholder expectations + lack of an actual product + 32 million USD ICO

[Anonymous No.9784176]

>>9784026
>sergey's role as ceo is update his investors. Well he knew what the fuck an ico was and knew the coins could change hands...well if you hold link you are an investor in chainlink..its sergey's responsibility to update...unless he wants the sec up his ass for frauding investors.
Sergey's role as CEO is to run a successful company with successful products and services.
The people who bought the tokens are not investors, they are buyers of an asset which grants you access to the chainlink network. This COULD give you profits if you put in the work and run a node. Buying the tokens don't guarantee profits on itself, that's why the token isn't a security.
>When Dimitri is still gone at end of june you will better understand..i heard from multiple people he is back at loop and tie.
Rory confirmed is temporary, if Rory says anything I'll gladly accept that you're right.
>Rory is leaving..you forgot that part...see rory manages a few communities, check out tap project or aurora idex telegram and you will see rory quite a bit...actually rory spends way more time in that community. He is leaving full time to idex because they got so big...
Still false, Rory is involved in some other communities as most other crypto enthusiasts but noting full time.
>Its public perception and you have oraclize established, corda with working oracles and actual projects, now iota with partners announcing they will go live in 3 weeks, zap on testnet...and chainlink silent. even testnet silent
At least we can dispel the FUD that nobody needs oracles when other companies are trying to build their owns.
>The activity you are talkking about is link faucet transfers. If you look at actual data requests there are none except for thomas and johnny.
I'm talking about the events (The requests for data). Not the link token transactions.

[Anonymous No.9784187]

>>9784055
>Basically three major red flags:
>Excessive bagholder expectations
Why is this a red flag?
>lack of an actual product
They are working on the product, you can check the pivotal tracker and github.
>32 million USD ICO
Why is this a red flag?

[Anonymous No.9784504]

>>9784035
fucking BASED

[Anonymous No.9784527]

>Paying for API data
Why would you do that when you can get it for free

[Anonymous No.9784600]

>>9784504
WARNING MARINES
A discord crew is fuddin LINK up in preparation fo' a pump n' dump. They hope nuff will push so they fomo back up in n' loot they pumped bags. First, they ask fo' LINK memes all dem minutes ago ''Oh /biz/ help, I lost mah meme folda n' all mah LINK memes is gone'' n' then they start a heavy FUD campaign. I aint talkin' bout chicken n' gravy biatch. In tha next few minutes or weeks, they will pump n' dump LINK.
WARNING OVER

[Anonymous No.9784604]

>>9784527
Some are free, some aren’t.

[Anonymous No.9784743]

>>9784527
Why would customers trust data that you fetched yourself?
How would you fetch data in a completely trustless way?
Is it easier to code an oracle for your multi-million dollar smart contracts or use a centralized oracle that can be hacked and has downtime than to use a plug n' play decentralized oracle that has no downtime and pays you a penalty if you get bad data instead of suing?

[Anonymous No.9784752]

>>9783593
>What's your reason?
i don't care
it's just an other shitcoin out of hundreds

[Anonymous No.9784794]

>>9784752
Have you researched it?

[Anonymous No.9784804]

>>9783593
First, it get shilled the fuck out.
Second , everything about lunk right now is just as the concept phase no real product for real world use case yet to be seen. The test net result is just only a small fragments or not even close to the thing this shitcoins can done by those shiller said.
So when the mainet out and it show it real form then I will consider some of my btc for this.

[Anonymous No.9784809]

>>9784794
why would i? everything with an ico is a shitcoin learn it already!

[Anonymous No.9784839]

>>9784809
Ethereum had an ICO.

[Anonymous No.9784841]

The fud is literally just a Discord group. It's not natural for threads about a coin to gain 10 hate posts all within a minute. If the coin was garbage they would just filter or ignore it.

They all coordinate and shitpost.

[Anonymous No.9784843]

>>9783660
he fell for marketcap meme....

Lets say there are 1000 LINk holders who bought for 0,5. Lets say they wont sell a single LINK for at least 10000. Lets say there is a 1 buyer who NEED LINK and he is willing to buy it for 10000.

BOOOM, THERE IS YOUR FUCKING MARKETCAP, IT MEANS NOTHING

[Anonymous No.9784844]

>>9784839
and?

[Anonymous No.9784852]

>>9784804
>First, it get shilled the fuck out
I've seen mostly fud and mocking of link holders. But why would shilling make you not research it?
>So when the mainet out and it show it real form then I will consider some of my btc for this.
Seems fair.

[Anonymous No.9784861]

>>9784844
>everything with an ico is a shitcoin
ETH had an ICO.
Do you consider Ethereum to be a shitcoin?

[Anonymous No.9784896]

>>9784861
of course there is only 2 contender for the non shitcoin status and one is losing badly.

[Anonymous No.9784905]

>>9784896
Which are?

[Anonymous No.9784936]

>>9784905
btc and bch

[Anonymous No.9784953]

It's pretty funny how they are mad at Link "shilling" yet Link is the only coin which gained ground on /biz/ naturally through memes and get posts and not some spam Discord.

Why don't they care that a Discord has spammed 0xbtc here 1000x per day for the last month even though it's a zero utility shitcoin with an anonymous Pajeet dev?

What about AMB, whose CEO literally browses /biz/ and tells his followers to shill masternodes and is a genuine scammer who got deported from UK?

[Anonymous No.9784974]

I’m a link holder that wishes he wasn’t. All American alt-coin holders are going to get raped by the sec.

[Anonymous No.9784979]

>>9784936
...BCH, only non two shitcoins.
Well, I have nothing else to say to you sir.
Thanks for contributing to this thread.

[Anonymous No.9784998]

>>9784953
This is the only coin that seems to have a true following and organic meme growth, I've seen it too.
Shit like 0x, Dero, Ambrosus, Wysker, Bitcoin Cash are shilled pajeetly, you can quickly learn to discern between true shilling and inorganic forced one.

[Anonymous No.9785016]

>>9784852
>why would shilling make you not research it?
Already did and to me. It not seems like this shitcoins can reach anything those shiller said. I mean of course this could be big but y guys literally overhyped this shit way to the god of all crypto or some kind shit like that. There is already a lot of blockchain platform out there that can do thing link could do and they might even become better than they are right now when link mainet is out. So yes I won't touch it until mainet then I will thinking more about it.

[Anonymous No.9785030]

This board shills it nonstop, I don’t have it partly out of spite for the annoying newfags that spam it constantly. And how is something that has delivered no product at all worth over $100m mcap.

[Anonymous No.9785044]

>>9785016
>There is already a lot of blockchain platform out there that can do thing link could do and they might even become better than they are right now when link mainet is out.

What platforms can do what chainlink can?
To my knowledge there isn't another project that's trying to create decentralized oracles that have even a testnet out yet.

[Anonymous No.9785048]

>>9785030
>And how is something that has delivered no product at all worth over $100m mcap.
Have you looked at tron?

[Anonymous No.9785049]

Been shilled for so long, every day I see a post saying tommorrow is THE day, it is still hovering 30-50c since a year ago

[Anonymous No.9785061]

>>9785030#
>And how is something that has delivered no product at all worth over $100m mcap.
Every Chinese coin ever. Iota. EOS, OMG, Cardano.

[Anonymous No.9785071]

It's an Eth token, making it a PITA to buy and automatically a shitcoin.

[Anonymous No.9785118]

>>9784998

BCH may have its share of pajeet propaganda here like every other coin/token I'd wager they're big enough to not have to focus any effort spamming some obscure basque rural sports betting board. It may have an effect in the price of tokens such as Wysker but I can't see that happening to bigger ones like BCH.

[Anonymous No.9785141]

>>9785030


>>9785048
Or IOTA

[Anonymous No.9785152]

>>9784804
>hes not going to buy the rumour, he is going to buy the news
lol

[Anonymous No.9785186]

>>9785152
I was going to say that but i think it's fair that he wants to wait until a more mature product comes out even if it means less gains.

[Anonymous No.9785254]

This is the thread that finally makes me filter Link. Good luck everyone itt who isn't a smoothbrain thirdworlder, all two of you.

[Anonymous No.9785276]

>>9783593

My linkies stay super stinky!

[Anonymous No.9785304]

>>9785254
You could give some of the reasons why you don't want to hold the token.
But feel free to filter link threads.

[Anonymous No.9785340]

>>9783593
Honestly i never bought LINK because all ERC20 tokens are prefab crap. No ERC20 token can ever be good. The best preforming, EOS, preforms because the creator already has 2 coins and knows how a mainnet works, so people have confidence.

I see 90% of ERC20 failing

[Anonymous No.9785369]

another day, and another LINK thread. Trading 4% lower even. Every day LINK holders lose money is a reminder that god loves us and is looking out for us.

[Anonymous No.9785384]

>>9784998
>This is the only coin that seems to have a true following and organic meme growth,

A very deceptive statement. LINK has the fakest, most forced shilling of all the shitcoins around.

[Anonymous No.9785417]

>>9785384
Actually having a true following and meme growth is the early stages of every revolutionary idea. The memes is the ideation and proving stage. The existing community will form the foundation for where the network will be formed.

[Anonymous No.9785473]

>>9785384
>LINK has the fakest, most forced shilling of all the shitcoins around.
LINK has the fakest, most forced fudding of all the coins around.
Fixed that for you.

[Anonymous No.9785521]

[Anonymous No.9785559]

>>9785384
how can you say that, link memes are crafted with such love and care. you cant just buy that

[Anonymous No.9785565]

>>9783593
just bought 4700 more links while theyre cheap. late Q4 mainnet, i reckon. good buy at this price.

[Anonymous No.9785582]

>>9783857
>>9784026

this is good fud. not gonna sell as i'm not a complete brainlet, but very good fud.

[Anonymous No.9785596]

[Anonymous No.9785652]

>>9784035
Fucking kek