[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 892 KB, 1474x828, Screen Shot 2018-06-05 at 4.46.33 PM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9762917 No.9762917 [Reply] [Original]

I've noticed occasionally while researching Chainlink the use of two different spellings of the term "smart contract". Sometimes it is spelled as "smart contract" when referring to the concept of a smart contract and other times it is spelled as "SmartContract" when discussed in terms of their actual implementation. This latter spelling has always caught my eye as it would appear to be referring to a SmartContract.com smart contract, although this is never explicitly stated. Below is an example:

>A new wave of blockchain technologies have introduced the concept of Smart Contracts and is now being referred to as Blockchain 2.0.

>Using SmartContracts and cryptlets on an Azure-based, enterprise-class, blockchain consortium network, we will allow tenants within the MediaValet digital asset management platform to participate.

https://www.mediavalet.com/blog/blockchain-digital-asset-management/

This example is unique in that the author goes from using the "smart contract" spelling and then switches to "SmartContract". Has anyone else noticed this while sleuthing? Is there any reason why the space would be removed between the two words that I'm missing?

>BONUS

Below is a recent Microsoft slideshow explaining Cryptlets' strategy. The last step is to "Develop key Azure blockchain middleware services to ensure the infrastructure is enterprise ready".

http://slideplayer.com/slide/12957527/#

>> No.9762941
File: 405 KB, 1080x1920, Screenshot_20180605-232022.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9762941

>>9762917
Here boy.
Take a brake.

>> No.9763066

>>9762941

Just found dis place n' I be amazed at how tha fuck much support fo' Sergey Nazarov you muthafuckas is showing. Let me rap muthafuckas a story. I be thinkin you gonna appreciate dat shit.

Yo ass may not know dis yo, but Sergey is straight-up a pimpin' decent dribbla n' shit. I remember last year attendin a event all up in tha NBA Allstar break. I was part of his crew n' let me rap , we was up in Awe when his thugged-out lil' punk-ass bounced tha bizzle all up in his fuckin legs. Dat shiznit was incredible.

Whatz even crazier is what tha fuck happened next. Jebron Lames straight-up strutted up wit a funky-ass basketball, apparently gettin locked n loaded ta yell at JR Smizzle. Right back up in yo muthafuckin ass. Sergey looked at Jebron n' holla'd "Man thatz all you eva do is yell. Yell, yell, yell." Lames looked at his ass n' holla'd "Well if I had yo' talent Nazarov I wouldn't gotta yell all muthafuckin day."

Crazy.

>> No.9763107

>>9762917
Read these too OP
https://github.com/Azure/azure-blockchain-projects/tree/master/bletchley

>> No.9763173
File: 54 KB, 430x758, 1525439471879.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9763173

Every scam ever had a huge fucking marketing campaign, so does it mean that chainlink is scamproof?

>> No.9763359

The only non scam and representation of wealth is gold bullion. You can never be jewed out of your purchasing power when you own gold.

Never value gold in terms of dollars. After all, it's not like gold all of a sudden became valuable when America was born and the dollar was created. So why would you be valuing gold in terms of crumply dirty fiat

>> No.9763504

>>9763107

Thanks, mane. Looks like they refer to them as SmartContracts in examples as well.

https://github.com/Azure/azure-blockchain-projects/blob/master/bletchley/images/UtilityVContract.png
https://github.com/Azure/azure-blockchain-projects/blob/master/bletchley/images/smartcontracts.png
https://github.com/Azure/azure-blockchain-projects/blob/master/bletchley/images/contractCryptlet.png

>> No.9763544

60e93d5 on Sep 20, 2016

>> No.9763564
File: 298 KB, 564x783, Chainlink sergay2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9763564

>>9762941


(((((((((ROPSTEN)))))))))

>> No.9764446

>>9763066
is this pasta supposed to be funny?