Is this train of thought psychotic?

[Anonymous No.9708785]

I think it is completely reasonable, but i want to see what anon thinks.
1) global crypto mkt cap had an ath of around 0.8T.
ii) many believe the market will do another 10X (at least).
c) this would leave the global crypto mkt cap at around 8-10T.
4) succesful crypto projects (top 10 in cmc) have a mkt cap of around 1% of the global crypto mkt cap.
v) this would mean that a top 10 project could have a mkt cap of around 100B
6) if chainlink is to be successful, it then would be reasonable to assume it might reach a mkt cap of around 100B. with the current amount of coins circulating (which will no doubt decrease, not increase) that equals a price of around $250-$300 per LINK.

[Anonymous No.9708804]

you're a faggot, OP

[Anonymous No.9708831]

>>9708804
pls explain

[Anonymous No.9708842]

I don't give a shit about Link so I can't say anything about the price of that but I'd say your prediction of an 8-10t market cap is actually pretty low.

Tech "bubble" was about 10t.

Crypto is actually a lot more accessible for people. You can create an account on an exchange in seconds.

It makes me laugh that people think we have reached the top ATH already.

We are only just starting to see MVP's come out. Banks have started paying attention as well as investors.

Strap the fuck in!

[Anonymous No.9709067]

>>9708842
Based anon.
I have literally posted this exact same deduction on here many times in the past, and now that I am back for the first time in months, it is good to see the /bizraelis trickling back to this board.

based anon. based.

[Anonymous No.9709170]

>>9708842
Which cryptos do you give a shit about?

[Anonymous No.9709204]

>>9709170
He’s all in chainlink anon.

[Anonymous No.9709236]

>>9708831
you = faggot

[Anonymous No.9709349]

>>9708842
Do you think cryptos are as influential as the unternet though?
I don’t believe it doesn’t. I’m just a little concerned.

[Anonymous No.9709389]

>>9708785

ambrosus will have a 100B market cap

[Anonymous No.9709512]

>>9708785
You are correct, but this won’t happen until 2022-2025 most likely

[Anonymous No.9710162]

>>9709349
Good point, they're a different thing. One of the things that still make me bullish on crypto long term is that it's been called a bubble all the way from the bottom to the top. This usually puts things on decently strong hands.

[Anonymous No.9710165]

>>9709512
That's OK. I can wait 4-7 years to be worth north of $10m.

[Anonymous No.9710235]

>>9709349
>hasn't heard about SKY

this ain't 2017 nigga

[Anonymous No.9710545]

>>9709236
great. thanks for the explanation.

[Anonymous No.9711131]

>>9709067
shit will mutate, but crypto isn't going to just fade away. It isn't a 3D TV or a VR headset.
And when it does return to overdrive mode, it will be when normies have completey become disinterested and have cashed out. Then those same retards and boomers will start throwing in their life savings again to catch the wave. They'll miss it and get dumped on again, this time not only by whales, but by some faggots on biz too.

[Anonymous No.9711450]

You're underestimating. Link will probably be top 5. And if the crypto cap is 20 trillion, Link will EASILY have at LEAST 1 trillion mc. Now with node operators hoarding link, and almost all tokens being consolidated into their hands, there will easily be <50 million in circulation. Do the math.

[Anonymous No.9711495]

>>9708785
Does this Sergey guy even actually exist he looks like he's paid by some government to act like a savant when he's actually really a retard.

[Anonymous No.9711575]

>>9708785
Chainlink is the only good crypto project in 2018. Do with that what you will.
>>9711495
Sergey is that really smart guy who knows he isn't quite genius level so he keeps his head down and works extra hard ie. literal perfection of a human being.

[Anonymous No.9711616]

>current circulating supply of link is 1/3rd the total supply
>somehow this can only decrease
explain your reasoning because AFAIK there is no token burning in the works

[Anonymous No.9711631]

>>9711450
holy fuck Linkies truly are the most retarded cunts in crypto

[Anonymous No.9711661]

>>9711631
Shit like that makes me facepalm when looking at my link stack. Fucking delusion beyond anything I've ever seen

[Anonymous No.9711723]

>>9711631
>>9711661
There is no reason for LINK to not be top 5. The CMC 100 is fucking wall-to-wall pets.com right now. An absolute festival of shit.

[C !Odemonkey. No.9711797]

I don't give a fuck about any specific coin. I'm dick-deep in TWENTIX because:
a) it's the index fund of the top 20 coins on coinmarketcap
b) its brother BTWTY is at a steep premium (should be 1 BTWTY == 100,000 TWENTIX, but it's currently sitting at around 550,000 TWENTIX)
c) it's on a DEX and not a CEX.

If any coin wins, I win. It's that simple!

[Anonymous No.9711880]

>>9711616
>>9711661
It's simple. Node operators will accumulate more and more Link and keep them locked up in nodes. This effectively takes them out of the circulating supply. Since there is a finite supply, over time the circulating supply will diminish as more and more is consolidated to node operators The link from those who sell their stacks will eventually all be consolidated. There's a reason Link has 18 decimals. A Link token could be worth 1 billion and fractions could still be used to pay for the network.

And yes, Link could very well hit 1 trillion if the total crypto market cap is 20 trillion. This is a new protocol, not some pajeet scam or btc/eth but bettur. Obviously this is not guaranteed, but absolutely possible. I'm done trying to convince fags like you. Sell early if that's what you want to do.

[Anonymous No.9712051]

>>9711880
its gonna be higher than 1 trillion of the total mcap of crypto since everything will go through chainlink. all the money flows in with chainlink.

[Anonymous No.9712154]

>>9711450
>Do the math
>1000000000000/50000000=20000
>$20k/Link
damn we really gone make it brehs

[Anonymous No.9712237]

>>9708785
im all in, now i just wait

[Anonymous No.9712605]

>>9711880
Link is not a protocol. Its a middleware. There is a difference.

[Anonymous No.9712668]

>>9711880
you think link will have 5% market dominance and 950m tokens will be removed from circulation
you are a legit deluded bag holder

[Anonymous No.9713697]

>>9712668

The current mkt cap is 300bn. 5% of that is 16 billion.

As of right now, bitcoin cash has a mkt cap of 17 billion, and its use case is ridiculous. Fuckin ripple has a mkt cap of 24bn....

Sry, but I don't think 5% for a useful project sounds that deluded.