[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 11 KB, 443x324, REQT.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9673973 No.9673973 [Reply] [Original]

>he still didn't sell
>he still thinks it's not going to ICO price

>> No.9674083

>>9673973
>They don’t realize it’s about to be listed on Coinbase and pump back to $1.00

>> No.9674156

>>9674083
>>They don’t realize it’s about to be listed on Coinbase and pump back to $1.00
why would they list a pay button scam that does nothing?

>> No.9674177

>>9674083
>he thinks they will list a whitepaper shitcoin with no working product on coinbase

>> No.9674209

>>9673973
hey, thanks for caring about my portfolio beta, anon
>saged

>> No.9674223

>>9674209
Announcing sage is a bannable offense, anon. :^)

>> No.9674231

This may be a brainlet question but will req have a token swap?

>> No.9674243

>>9673973
>He thinks selling at the bottom is a good idea
It's only pajeets that post REQ fud. Anyone with half a brain has gotten some big profits out of REQ.

>> No.9674308

The level and amount of fud has been impressive these past few weeks. Selling now would be a mistake since it's so low but only if you bought back in november like all the smart anons. if you bought above 10 cents, you're a newfag. This shit will not die so easily.

>> No.9674364

>>9674308
>Selling now would be a mistake
I don't think so. It's not only price action. Project has changed a lot over the last few days. They confirmed that fiat is not coming, introduced that fluid roadmap bullshit and lost the second most important partnership.

>> No.9674383
File: 58 KB, 600x578, F6CC3E58-F50E-402C-88D1-6157EDB2D313.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9674383

>>9674364
>They confirmed that fiat is not coming
gtfo pajeet

>> No.9674415

>>9674383
not coming in the nearest future

>> No.9674421

>>9674364
>fiat is not coming
Nothing of the sort was said. It might be your assumption but that's just it. I do agree things look bad though.

>> No.9674436

>>9674421
Of course they won't say it explicitly. Check the new roadmap, it's not even under the 'up next' tab

>> No.9674690

>>9674156
B/c that is crypto.
Nothing works, only hype.

>> No.9674744

>>9674690
REQ doesn't have any hype. That's the problem

>> No.9675223

>>9674436
>Old milestones may also have been merged, for instance: ‘Add management of fiat-currencies to Request’ is now added under the Up Next status, merged into the bigger Supporting more currencies goal.
>The next up goals are Extensibility and advanced payment conditions extension, request explorer, cross-currency support and more currency support.

>> No.9675294

WHY WOULD THEY NEED TO ADD FIAT CURRENCY WHEN LITERALLY EVERYONE COULD JUST PAY EACH OTHER IN REQ?

CHECKMATE

>> No.9676128

>>9674436
>>9675223
B T F O
T
F
O

But seriously, when are niggers going to learn how to read?