[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 54 KB, 1144x380, asd.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9660792 No.9660792 [Reply] [Original]

>wikimedia already removed from website
Top kek.

>> No.9660862

>>9660792

HOLY shit I just checked and this is true.

I haven't been following this, what happened?

>> No.9660888

they already removed 1 month ago. don't be a faggot

>> No.9660927

>>9660862
Wikimedia said REQ team has been bullshitting them for 6 months and doesn't have any product, so they broke the partnership
https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimedia-l/2018-May/090360.html

>> No.9660957

>>9660888
>this cope
Lol I literally entered the website yesterday and it was there. What the fuck is your problem? Bags too heavy?

>> No.9660973

>>9660957
Fucking REQ fags are all like this, fun to see them get REKT

>> No.9661029

I bought 2 coins this week, 1 real coin WAU Coin and its up in btc and usd, one shitcoin gamble REQ. REQ is down WAU is up. Gee who would have known binance nigger coins mostly go down

>> No.9661083

>>9660888
REQ fags are degenerate dumbfucks, AKA just what we need in the market

>> No.9661094

LOL what a fail for REQUEST,

Dont forget they are LINK partners too LOL.

I would sell LINK too

>> No.9661112
File: 14 KB, 225x234, rock-chuck.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9661112

>>9660862

Since they made the announcement of the partnership weeks ago, they have not held a single conversation with Wikimedia about technical implementation.

Wikimedia got pissed off they were being using for nothing but bullshit marketing and decided to dump the deadbeats.

Well done Wikimedia.

>> No.9661115

>>9661094

Link are not partnered with req
Req needs link but link doesn't need req

>> No.9661133

>>9660792
Nice FUD. Very elaborate. The REQ website was obviously hacked. How's the accumulating going for you? Can't wait for the COINBASE listing. $$$

>> No.9661139
File: 125 KB, 1280x960, w6CzApH.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9661139

>>9660973

I'm a REQ holder since ICO, but there is no community I loathe more than the desperate REQ-chimps and their heavy bags.

>> No.9661144

>>9661133
>falseflagging this hard.

>> No.9661150

>>9661139
Sell now into my buy orders and stay poor pajeet. $10 EOY

>> No.9661180
File: 74 KB, 331x319, 1270013133259.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9661180

>>9661133
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

>> No.9661190

Boi I'm fucking mad right fucking now !

>> No.9661193

>>9661150

I own nearly a half a million REQ. Top 120 holder BTW.

Your puny order is a turd in a sea of shit in the Indian ocean.

>> No.9661223

>>9660862
>wikimedia bought 500k REQ-Tokens otc
>REQ Team fucked up and sold them the old ones without BurnGuard
>250k instantly burned after transaction

>> No.9661234

>>9661112
ok AAfloor redditor

>> No.9661277

We are mooning REQbois. I'm so glad I held, who gives a shit about some wikipedia partnership lmao.

>> No.9661424

>>9661234

Holy shit, I've been hacked. :3

Anyway, all of the FUD about REQ has been proven correct.

The PwC "partnership" is the next one to get shit-canned.